prof dr. andreas walther - participation or non- participaton ?

[email protected]

Participation or non-participation?

The power of concepts and distinctions in (dis)empowering young people in late modern capitalism

15th of November 2013, Bilgi University Istanbul

Prof. Dr. Andreas Walther, Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main

Social Pedagogical Research Centre „Education and Coping in the Life Course“

“Full participation of young people in civic and political life is an increasing challenge, in light of the gap between youth and the institutions … increasing youth participation in the civic life of local communities and in representative democracy, by supporting youth organisations as well as various forms of 'learning to participate', by encouraging participation of non-organised young people and by providing quality information services.“

[email protected]

Normative: full participation is positive !Quantitative: full vs. empty/incomplete

Social change:Less participation

Forms and areas: some know exactly what participation is, where and how it occurs

Relation: Participation as conditional – young people as inable and anxious

Who has to bridge the gap? Non-participation as deficit / mal-adaptation of young people which can be compensated by policies


Questions and aims

• Youth participation is positive and its meaning is unanimous

• Young people do not participate enough or not in the right way

• The lack of participation can / has to be addressed by policy and pedagogical practice educate/learn first, participate later

Questions and overview:

1. Meaning(s), discourses and prerequisites of „participation“

2. Empirical findings I: how much youth participation

3. Empirical findings II: experiences, parctices and meanings of young people

4. Conclusions: Distinctions and differentation

[email protected] Pedagogical Research Centre „Education and Coping in the Life Course“

ES

PT

IT

GR

UK

FI

PL

NL

AT SK

RO

BG

D

SI

DKIE

F

Research background

S

Youth policy and participation (YOYO). Qualitative study on potentials of participation and informal learning for young people‘s transitions to the labour market (2001-2004)

Youth – actor of social change (UP2YOUTH). Literature review and comparative analysis on transitions to parenthood, young immigrantsa and youth participation

Governance of educational trajectories in Europe (GOETE): access, coping and relevance of education for young people (2010-2013)

1. Meanings and discourses of (youth) participation

• Meaning in most languages ambiguous and broad

– power/claims/rights – presence/attendance

– active – passive

– goal or principle of policy and practice

• Participation as principle of and tensions in modern politics, democracy and civil society:

– self-determination - co-determination

– right of voluntary involvement – expectation of responsibility

– engagement - formal procedures

– deliberation (voice) – representation

– public space – organisation

– self-realisation - alienation


Discourses of youth participation: what is said – what not?

… depend on contexts, actors, interrests, actors and power relations of the youth participation discourse

– Individualisation and mass society Fragmentation and mediatisation of the public sphere International and suprastatal governance (EU, UN) Destandardisation of life course and transitions to adulthood Neoliberalism:

Active welfare / social investment state activation of human capital; expectation of self-responsibility (instead of solidarity)

Active citizenship (denounciation of passive dependency) Emergence of a „participation industry“


Examples

1) “Youth are a priority of the European Union's social vision, and the current crisis compounds the need to nurture young human capital … Europe's youth need to be equipped to take advantage of opportunities such as civic and political participation ...“

2) „Ladder of participation“: Struggles between policy makers, professionals and activists on ‚real‘ and ‚enough‘ participation (Arnstein 1969; Hart 1992)

[email protected]

• Prerequisites:

– Mediation between subjective relevances and collective necessities

– Power and rights

– Trust and recognition

– Time and space

– Competencies and consciousness?


2. Empirical findings I: how much youth participation

Political participation

National differences are bigger than intragenerational differences

Participation in elections last 3 years Political interest (<30)

Young people 15-30 (Eurobarometer)

Adults(OECD) European social survey

Eurobarometer

2007 2013 2005 2003 2007

EU 62 56 - - 82

DE 63 53 71 48 87

IT 56 71 81 22 78

UK 53 38 66 41 86

FI 53 64 69 33 82

PL 74 22 55 27 83

SK 71 52 59 - 83

Social Pedagogical Research Centre „Education and Coping in the Life Course“ [email protected]

Non-conventional forms of political participation

Eurobarometer Spannring et al. 2008

2007: preferred action 2004: done past 12 months

debates petition demo party union NGO Demo Consumerism

EU 29 11 13 16 11 11 - -

DE 22 20 24 27.7 14.6

IT 34 12 19 46.4 22.6

UK 25 18 15 3.6 4.5

FI 34 15 17 9.9 32.3

PL 39 13 18 - -

SK 42 17 11 5.7 20.5


Participation and inequality

differences especially according to education

Eurobarometer Fahmy 2006

elections membership debate demo pol. part.

2007 2013 2007 2007 2007

Education + (higher) + (higher) + (higher) + (higher) + (lower) + (higher)

Gender - - + (male) - - -

Employm. + (highest self-empl)

+ (highest employees)

+ (highest employees)

- - -


Lessons from surveys:

• No clear sign of break down of political participation

• No clear sign of break down of social participation (sports dominates)

• National differences bigger than generational differences

• Perspective towards formal/conventional forms too narrow trends towards non-conventional forms

• Under-representation of lower educated youth across all conventional and non-conventional forms of social and political participation (are policy makers right?) - also in e-participation (CIVICWEB project) but why?

– Competencies and information?

– Low expectation of effectiveness? Learned mistrust in formal institutions

– Lack of relevance of issues associated with participation?

Need of broadening the perspective: experiences in public institutions and youth cultures


Empirical findings II: practices and meanings of young people

• Experience of participation in public institutions

– Projects GOETE (www.goete.eu) and UP2YOUTH (www.up2youth.org): marginal influence in school

– German research on youth in public care: professionals restrict participation referring to deficits and for loss of professional authority


• Youth work as participatory institution?

• Project YOYO (www.iris-egris.de/yoyo): participation in transition from school to work bigger in ‚soft‘ youth policies (e.g. youth work) than ‚hard‘ youth policies (e.g. training and employment schemes)

• Choice

• Spaces for experimentation

• Trustful relationships

• Phd Larissa von Schwanenflügel: participation biographies of disadvantaged young people (low education,poor families) in youth work depend on ‚fit‘ between biographical needs and what they find in youth work

• But:

– ‚soft‘ youth policies rarely provide ‚hard‘ resources (problem of social recognition and relevance)?

– Trend of instrumentalisation for school in the context of neoliberal activation and human capital formation


• Youth cultures as forms and contexts of participation:

– Youth cultures as expressions of youth as not only preparation for adulthood but life phase in its own right

– Youth cultures as contexts of (political) socialisation:

• Willis (Learning to labour): youth cultural practice as specific orientation towards working class culture

• Pfaff: music cultures as contexts of development of (quasi)political orientations (Goth – left wing; Metal – right wing/nationalist; HipHop – no party orientation but social justice as issue)

– Youth cultures as practice in the public sphere

• Claims for participation in the public sphere

• Experience of conflicts with other actors/interests and the authorities


[email protected]

Example 1: Riots in suburbs of Paris 2005

… as well as Athens,Copenhagen, London …

Isn‘t that simply agression and vandalism?or a „protopolitical rebellion“ (Lapeyronnie 2006)

Example 2: Skaters in public space

Is this serious? Don‘t they just wantto have fun?

Local initiative „Cork Skaters“(Ireland)


[email protected]

Example 3: young people ‚doing nothing‘ („Chilling“)

Wasting their time (and human capital) or resisting against (or at least claming for a break from) the constant pressure of (self)exploitation and competition


Doing nothing?

Contextualisation and/or validation of consciousness and intentions is needed to distinguish participation from non-participation


4. Conclusions: changed meaning of participation– or necessary differentiation of participation in late capitalism?

• Individualisation – biographisation:

– relevance of collective political issues needs to be experienced subjectively with regard to the own biography

• Neoliberalism – activation:

– The demand to take own choices (within the paradigms of human capital and employability) – regardless of options and resources – and being made accountable for own choices

• Fragmentation of the public sphere:

– Different issues of collective and subjective relevance are dealt with in different contexts participation programmes as „containers“

• Identity work – (in)visibility as a political issue?

– Youth cultures: under conditions of individualisation/ fragmentation and uncertainty visibility is a vital need of constructing identities


Claims of visibility: who has the power/right to define what is „real“ participation?

[email protected]

Proposal for a new definition of youth participation

All actions of young people in the public or addressing the public need to be seen as potentially participatory.

Only communicative validation can show whether the actor consciously related (or wanted to relate) individual interest with the wider community or society.

What does this mean?


• Research: extend research designs beyond measuring young people‘s behaviour with regard to formal participation analyse how individuals relate to the public

• Policy: dialogue rather than criminalising young people who act in the public; provide (different) spaces for experimentation; participation rights for young people to negotiate with adults and institutions including access to welfare!

• Pedagogical / youth work practice: negotiation of goals and methods; conflicts as participatory situation; experimentation rather than teaching participation regarding predefined issues.

• NGOs: accept particularity of own objectives and milieu; reflect differences between interests of initiators/organisors and participants/users.


prof dr. andreas walther - participation or non- participaton ?

News & Politics