processing and characterization of hierarchical surface treatments for ti implants

1
3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5 4.75 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Effect of pH on Nanotube Wall Thickness pH Thickness (nm) 3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 74.0 75.0 76.0 77.0 78.0 79.0 80.0 81.0 82.0 83.0 Effect of pH on Internal Diameter pH Internal Diameter (nm) Research Undergraduate: Alyson Michael Advisor: Dr. Grant Crawford Figure 1 Introduction Ti and its alloys are used in orthopedic implants due to their corrosion resistance, suitable strength to weight ratio, and favorable biocompatibility. Surface topography influences the success of orthopedic implants by increasing interaction at the bone-implant interface. Microscale surface features improve osseointegration. Nanoscale enhance bone cell function. In this investigation a hierarchical surface will be formed through the formation of TiO 2 nanotubes on a surface cold sprayed with 40 μm particles. Objectives Synthesize TiO 2 nanotubes via anodic oxidation on a polished Ti substrate and characterize them based on their processing conditions. Create a hierarchical surface on a Ti substrate by forming TiO 2 nanotubes via anodic oxidation on a Ti surface with microscale topography created by cold spraying the surface with 40 μm Ti particles. Procedure Polishing the Ti Substrate A 1.5 cm 2 Ti sample was polished with 600 and 1200 grit silica carbide paper and then brought to a mirror shine with 1 μm and 0.3μm alumina polishing solutions. Cold Spray 40 μm Ti particles were cold sprayed onto a Ti substrate that had been roughened with 600 grit silica carbide paper. Electrolyte Solution A 1 M H 2 SO 4 , 0.2 M citric acid, 0.1 M NaF and was buffered to the desired pH with solid NaOH pellets. It was determined that a pH of 4.00 was optimal for samples to be used in cell culture Anodization of Ti A potential difference was applied across the electrolyte solution for varying amounts of time. Characterization of the TiO 2 Nanotubes The nanotubes were imaged using FESEM as seen in Figure 5. The internal diameter, wall thickness, and nanotube length were visually measured using image analysis. Results Our preliminary results show some decrease in the internal diameter of the nanotubes at higher pH. This does not agree with the trend anticipated by the literature and calls for further investigation. The thickness of the nanotube wall increased slightly at higher pH. According to the literature, the wall thickness should have remained the same regardless of the increase in pH. As expected, nanotube length increased along with the anodization time. Nanotubes formed on the cold sprayed substrate. Conclusions The TiO 2 nanotubes were formed on the polished Ti substrate and their dimensions varied according to processing conditions. A novel hierarchical surface was created through the formation of TiO 2 nanotubes on a surface with a microstructure. Future Work Cell interaction with the hierarchical surface will be investigated in order to compare the novel Ti surface with current implant surface treatments. Other means of creating a microscale surface topography, such as laser deposition, may be of interest. Nanotube formation on more industrially relevant Ti alloys could be investigated. Acknowledgments Thanks to the National Science Foundation REU Site Award #1157074, Dr. Grant Crawford, Dr. Michael West, graduate student Ellen Sauter, and fellow REU student Christie McLinn. Processing and Characterization of Hierarchical Surface Treatments for Ti Implants Figure 3 Figure 2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Effect of Anodization Time on Nanotube Length Anodization Time (h) Length (nm) 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5 4.75 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Effect of pH on Nanotube Length pH Length (nm) Figure 4 Figure 5: TiO 2 Nanotubes on a Polished Ti Substrate Figure 7: Nanotubes on Cold Sprayed Ti Figure 6: Cross Section of TiO 2 Nanotubes 600 nm 6 μm 600 nm

Upload: geneva

Post on 23-Feb-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

600 nm. 6 μm. 600 nm. Processing and Characterization of Hierarchical Surface Treatments for Ti Implants. Research Undergraduate: Alyson Michael Advisor: Dr. Grant Crawford. Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Processing and Characterization of Hierarchical Surface Treatments for Ti Implants

3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5 4.7525

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34Effect of pH on Nanotube Wall Thickness

pH

Thic

knes

s (n

m)

3.25 3.50 3.75 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.7574.0

75.0

76.0

77.0

78.0

79.0

80.0

81.0

82.0

83.0 Effect of pH on Internal Diameter

pH

Inte

rnal

Dia

met

er (n

m)

Research Undergraduate: Alyson Michael Advisor: Dr. Grant Crawford

Figure 1

IntroductionTi and its alloys are used in orthopedic implants due to their corrosion resistance,

suitable strength to weight ratio, and favorable biocompatibility. Surface topography influences the success of orthopedic implants by increasing interaction at the bone-implant interface. Microscale surface features improve osseointegration. Nanoscale

enhance bone cell function. In this investigation a hierarchical surface will be formed through the formation of TiO2 nanotubes on a surface cold sprayed with 40 μm particles.

Objectives• Synthesize TiO2 nanotubes via anodic

oxidation on a polished Ti substrate and characterize them based on their processing conditions.

• Create a hierarchical surface on a Ti substrate by forming TiO2 nanotubes via anodic oxidation on a Ti surface with microscale topography created by cold spraying the surface with 40 μm Ti particles.

ProcedurePolishing the Ti Substrate • A 1.5 cm2 Ti sample was polished with 600

and 1200 grit silica carbide paper and then brought to a mirror shine with 1 μm and 0.3μm alumina polishing solutions.

Cold Spray• 40 μm Ti particles were cold sprayed onto a

Ti substrate that had been roughened with 600 grit silica carbide paper.

Electrolyte Solution• A 1 M H2SO4, 0.2 M citric acid, 0.1 M NaF

and was buffered to the desired pH with solid NaOH pellets.

• It was determined that a pH of 4.00 was optimal for samples to be used in cell culture

Anodization of Ti• A potential difference was applied across

the electrolyte solution for varying amounts of time.

Characterization of the TiO2 Nanotubes• The nanotubes were imaged using FESEM as

seen in Figure 5.

• The internal diameter, wall thickness, and nanotube length were visually measured using image analysis.

Results• Our preliminary results show some

decrease in the internal diameter of the nanotubes at higher pH. This does not agree with the trend anticipated by the literature and calls for further investigation.

• The thickness of the nanotube wall increased slightly at higher pH. According to the literature, the wall thickness should have remained the same regardless of the increase in pH.

• As expected, nanotube length increased along with the anodization time.

• Nanotubes formed on the cold sprayed substrate.

Conclusions• The TiO2 nanotubes were formed on the

polished Ti substrate and their dimensions varied according to processing conditions.

• A novel hierarchical surface was created through the formation of TiO2 nanotubes on a surface with a microstructure.

Future Work• Cell interaction with the hierarchical surface

will be investigated in order to compare the novel Ti surface with current implant surface treatments.

• Other means of creating a microscale surface topography, such as laser deposition, may be of interest.

• Nanotube formation on more industrially relevant Ti alloys could be investigated.

AcknowledgmentsThanks to the National Science Foundation REU Site Award #1157074, Dr. Grant Crawford, Dr. Michael West, graduate student Ellen Sauter, and fellow REU student Christie McLinn.

Processing and Characterization of Hierarchical Surface Treatments for Ti Implants

Figure 3

Figure 2

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.20

100200300400500600700800900

1000

Effect of Anodization Time on Nanotube Length

Anodization Time (h)

Leng

th (n

m)

3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5 4.750

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Effect of pH on Nanotube Length

pH

Leng

th (n

m)

Figure 4

Figure 5: TiO2 Nanotubes on a Polished Ti Substrate

Figure 7: Nanotubes on Cold Sprayed Ti

Figure 6: Cross Section of TiO2 Nanotubes

600 nm

6 μm

600 nm