processcontribuonsof australian&ecosystems&to ... · ahlström,&a.etal....
TRANSCRIPT
Vanessa Haverd, Cathy Trudinger, Ben Smith, Lars Nieradzik, Peter Briggs, Pep Canadell
CSIRO OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE
Process contribuHons of Australian ecosystems to interannual variaHons in the carbon cycle
Ahlström, A. et al. The dominant role of semi-‐arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink. Science 348, 895-‐899 (2015)
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Poulter, B. et al. ContribuHon of semi-‐arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 509, 600-‐603 (2014)
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
• Record global carbon uptake anomaly in 2011
• Australian ecosystems: • contributed 57% of
2011 anomaly of 1.5 ± 0.9 [1σ] Pg C
• have entered a regime of enhanced sensiJvity to rainfall since the mid-‐1990s.
• Lag between producJon and decomposiJon amplifies interannual variability of net carbon uptake. “fourfold increase in net carbon
uptake sensiJvity to precipitaJon” (comparing 1982-‐1996;1997-‐2011)
Piao, S. et al. EvaluaHon of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends. Global Change Biology 19, 2117-‐2132 (2013).
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
SensiJvity of Global Net Biome ProducJvity to Precip
ObjecHves
• QuanJfy interannual variability (IAV) of Australian Net Ecosystem ProducJon and magnitude of 2011 anomaly
• A\ribute IAV spaJally and by process
• QuanJfy sensiJvity of Australian Net Ecosystem ProducJon to precipitaJon anomalies
• Demonstrate transfer of vegetaJon drought response from Australian to global context.
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
DATA (for assimilaHon) • Eddy flux data (ET, Reco, GPP) • Streamflow • Li\erfall • Carbon pools (soil, li\er and
vegetaJon)
MODEL CABLE • Non-‐standard C-‐cycle soil-‐moisture responses
• SLI hydrology • Reduced PFTs
MODEL-‐DATA FUSION • Cost funcJon • Search strategy ((down-‐gradient
search ) • Refine target variables
PRODUCTS • Water and carbon fluxes and
stores (with uncertainJes) • Maps, monthly Jme series
TESTING • Independent data
PRIOR INFORMATION • Parameter esJmates
(literature)
DATA (for forcing) • Precip, radiaJon,
temperature • Soil, vegetaJon (RS FPAR) • All at 0.05o (~ 5km) res
updated parameter
Posterior PDF
Prior PDF
Haverd, V. et al. MulJple observaJon types reduce uncertainty in Australia's terrestrial carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 10, 2011-‐2040, (2013).
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Haverd, V. et al. MulJple observaJon types reduce uncertainty in Australia's terrestrial carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 10, 2011-‐2040, (2013).
MulHple observaHon types reduce uncertainty in Australian conHnental NPP
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Haverd, V. et al. MulJple observaJon types reduce uncertainty in Australia's terrestrial carbon and water cycles. Biogeosciences 10, 2011-‐2040, (2013).
Interannual variability in Australia’s terrestrial carbon cycle constrained by mulHple observaHon types
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Trudinger et al., Biogeosciences Discuss., doi:10.5194/bg-‐2016-‐186, 2016
Interannual variability in Australia’s terrestrial carbon cycle constrained by mulHple observaHon types
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Trudinger et al., Biogeosciences Discuss., doi:10.5194/bg-‐2016-‐186, 2016
Model-‐obs comparison: monthly and annual fluxes at 14 sites
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Trudinger et al., Biogeosciences Discuss., doi:10.5194/bg-‐2016-‐186, 2016
Interannual variability in Australian vegetaHon producHvity and net carbon uptake
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Terrestrial ecosystems in Australia absorbed 0.6±0.2 [2σ] Pg C in 2011 or 40% of the record global residual land sink anomaly
(i)
(ii)
Gross Fire Emissions Anomaly (GFED4)
Haverd et al., Env. Res. Le\., 11, 054013, 2016
QuanHfying the contribuHon of parHal Hme series anomaly to total Hme series anomaly
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Ahlström, A. et al. Science 348, 895-‐899 (2015)
contribuJon
parJal Jme series
total Jme series
• contributions sum to one • +ve contributions reflect
correlation with total time series
• -ve contributions reflect negative correlation with total time series
Regional ContribuHons to Interannual Variability of C-‐fluxes dominated by semi-‐arid ecosystems: “Savanna” and “Sparsely Vegetated”
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Cool Temperate Savanna Warm Temperate
Mediterranean Sparsely Vegetated
Tropics
Net Primary ProducJon Net Ecosystem ProducJon Heterotrophic RespiraJon
(i) (ii)
(vi) (v)
(ix) (viii) (vii)
(iv)
(iii)
IAV [g m-‐2 y
-‐1] ContribuJon to conJnental
IAV [% (10
4 km2) -‐1]
[mm y-‐1]
Haverd et al., Env. Res. Le\., 11, 054013, 2016
Extremeness of 2011 C-‐fluxes highest in Semi-‐Arid Regions
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
(i)
z-‐score of 2011 flux
2011 flux anomaly [g C m-‐2 y-‐1]
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
Haverd et al., Env. Res. Le\., 11, 054013, 2016
Net Primary ProducJon
Heterotrophic RespiraJon
Net Ecosystem ProducJon
Variability in decomposiHon offsets variability in producHon at conHnental scale
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Haverd et al., Env. Res. Le\., 11, 054013, 2016
(i)
(ii) NPP (iii) RH
Process ContribuJon to IAV in local N
EP
Dryland vegetaHon response to wet episode, not inherent shif in sensiHvity to rainfall, behind Australia's role in 2011 global carbon sink anomaly
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
1997-‐2010: (1.7±0.1)×10‑2 PgC mm-‐1 month 1982-‐1996: (1.5±0.4)×10-‐2 PgC mm-‐1 month
2011
Haverd et al., Global Change Biology, doi: 10.1111/gcb.13202 2016
Transfer of drought response and soil evaporaJon from Australian regional modelling improve CABLE ET predicJons at global Fluxnet sites
Haverd et al, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 2016, 1-‐24, 2016.
Transfer of drought response from Australian regional modelling helps to give good predicHons of IAV in global terrestrial carbon uptake.
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Summary
• SpaJally, IAV contribuJons dominated by Eastern savannas
• By process, IAV contribuJons dominated by NPP, significantly offset by Rh, and negligibly influenced by fire.
• 2011 anomaly in Australian NEP (40% of record global sink) wide-‐spread across northern third of the conJnent.
• No evidence of inherent ship in the sensiJvity of vegetaJon acJvity to moisture availability.
• Transfer of drought response from Australian regional modelling helps to give good predicJons of IAV in global terrestrial carbon uptake.
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Seasonal Drought: Northern Australian Tropical Transect
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Alternate drought response and SLI hydrology improve CABLE ET predicHons at global Fluxnet sites: examples
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Model-‐obs comparison: monthly fluxes
Australian C-‐cycle response to water availiability
Trudinger et al., Biogeosciences Discuss., doi:10.5194/bg-‐2016-‐186, 2016