procedural manual for dao 20aa-zz manual for dao 20aa-zz industrial ecowatch rating system...

Draft – Not for quotation or distribution

Procedural Manual for DAO 20AA-ZZ

Industrial EcoWatch Rating System

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Environmental Management Bureau

PROCEDURAL MANUAL


Draft – Not for quotation or distribution i

CONTENTS Section Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1

2.0 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE IERS ..................................................... 1

3.0 RATING AND COLOR CODING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE ....... 2

3.1 Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet ............................................... 2 3.1.1 Environmental Performance Criteria ........................................................ 4 3.1.2 Weights of Environmental Performance Criterion ..................................... 4 3.1.3 Applicability Screening (Y or N) ................................................................ 4 3.1.4 Applicable Weights................................................................................... 4 3.1.5 Total Number of Conditions and Number of Complied Conditions ............ 4 3.1.6 Records Presented / Remarks .................................................................. 5 3.1.7 Environmental Performance Score ........................................................... 5 3.1.8 Environmental Performance Rating .......................................................... 5

3.2 Scoring per Environmental Performance Criterion .......................................... 5 3.2.1 PD 1586 and its IRR ................................................................................ 5 3.2.2 RA 6969 (Title II – Chemical Management) ............................................... 8 3.2.3 RA 6969 (Title III – Hazardous Waste Management) ................................ 19 3.2.4 RA 8749 and its IRR .............................................................................. 23 3.2.5 RA 9275 and its IRR .............................................................................. 26 3.2.6 RA 9003 and its IRR .............................................................................. 29

3.3 Rating Protocol ............................................................................................. 32 3.3.1 Identification of Priority Sector ............................................................... 34 3.3.2 Assessment of Applicable Criteria for Establishments to be Rated .......... 34 3.3.3 Assessment of Environmental Performance ............................................ 34 3.3.4 Review and Validation of Environmental Performance Rating ................. 35 3.3.5 Notification of Establishment Regarding Their Environmental Performance

Rating ................................................................................................... 35

4.0 EVALUATION OF THE IERS ...................................................................... 35

5.0 REVIEW AND REVISION ........................................................................... 36

REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 37

ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET .................................. 39

NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING FORMAT .......................................... 47

PROCEDURAL MANUAL


Draft – Not for quotation or distribution ii

List of Tables

TABLE 1. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING AND COLOR CODES .................................. 2 TABLE 2. STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET ............... 3 TABLE 3. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR PD 1586 AND ITS IRR ...... 6 TABLE 4. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 6969 (TITLE II – TOXIC

CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES) .......................................................................................... 9 TABLE 5. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 6969 (TITLE III –

HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT).......................................................................... 20 TABLE 6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 8749 AND ITS IRR .... 24 TABLE 7. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 9275 AND ITS IRR .... 27 TABLE 8. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET FOR RA 9003 AND ITS IRR .... 30

List of Annexes

ANNEX 1. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET ANNEX 2. NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING FORMAT

PROCEDURAL MANUAL


Draft – Not for quotation or distribution 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION The commissioning of the Industrial EcoWatch Rating System (IERS) stems from the basic policy of the Philippine Government to uphold the right of the Filipino to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature. Towards this end, the IERS shall be adopted by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) as part of its compliance monitoring system. Pursuant to the following laws and their respective implementing rules and regulations (IRR); DENR, through the Environmental Management Bureau (EMB), shall obtain any record, report, or information pertaining to the establishments’ environmental performance:

Presidential Decree (PD) 1586 Philippine Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System

Republic Act (RA) 6969 Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act of 1990

RA 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999

RA 9003 Ecological Solid Wastes Management Act of 2000

RA 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 Correspondingly, such information shall be made available to the public with due consideration to any intellectual property rights, through the DENR’s IERS. 2.0 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE IERS The IERS is intended to promote self-regulation among establishments for improved environmental compliance and performance through a rating system. It is designed to encourage pollution reduction beyond compliance and ensure effective enforcement of the requirements on compliance inspection of PD 1586, RA 6969, RA 8749, RA 9003, RA 9275, and their respective IRR. The IERS shall be applicable to all establishments as indicated in Section 3.0 of DAO 20AA-ZZ Revised Guidelines for Industrial EcoWatch Rating System.

For planning and budgetary purposes, a list of priority establishments shall be issued by the Office of the EMB Director based on the following criteria:

Multi-media concerns

Priority sector for economic development either in the national or regional level

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



3.0 RATING AND COLOR CODING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Environmental performance is the implementation and practice of responsible environmental management that ensures, at the very minimum, compliance with environmental laws and regulations and other related policies. Under the IERS, environmental performance of establishments is rated based on compliance to the following key environmental modules:

PD 1586 Philippine EIS System

RA 6969 Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes Control Act of 1990

Title II – Chemical Management Title III – Hazardous Waste Management

RA 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999

RA 9003 Ecological Solid Wastes Management Act of 2000

RA 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 Each environmental module has equal weight. To attain the minimum level of performance (GOOD), an establishment must meet the performance rating shown in Table 1. However, should an establishment get a failing rate (< 91%) in any environmental module; it shall warrant a failed grade and a RED or BLACK Environmental Performance Color Code, depending on the overall rating. Table 1 summarizes the performance rating and the equivalent color codes. The succeeding subsections describe in detail the criteria and the rating process.

Table 1. Environmental Performance Rating and Color Codes

Performance Rating Level of Performance Color Code

Rated as Silver for Two Consecutive Years Excellent Gold

Rated as Green for Two Consecutive Years Outstanding Silver

At least 91% PLUS the emission and/ or effluent concentrations are lower than the applicable standards by at least 20%

Very Good Green

91% rating and above Good Blue

71 to 90% rating Needs Improvement Red

70% rating and below Bad Black

3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET Each environmental module has its own separate worksheet and shall be assessed and rated independently from one another. In addition, each module has an equal contribution to the overall rating of an establishment. The structure of the worksheet is presented in Table 2, while details are discussed hereafter. Annex 1 presents the complete environmental performance rating worksheet to be used for the IERS.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Table 2. Structure of the Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet

Module Environmental Performance

Criteria Weights

Applicability Screening (Y or N)

Applicable Weights

Total No. of Conditions

No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/ Remarks

Environmental Performance

Score


Rating

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



3.1.1 Environmental Performance Criteria For each environmental module, specific criteria have been identified to be used in assessing the environmental performance of establishments. These include, but are not limited to, the following:

Securing of permits and/or clearances

Meeting performance standards

Training

Reporting 3.1.2 Weights of Environmental Performance Criterion A specific weight is assigned per environmental performance criterion. Each environmental module has a distinct total weight for all of its criteria. The assigned weights are fixed and should not be changed from one establishment to another. Should a change be deemed necessary, this shall only be conducted after the review of the EMB Technical Committee and approval of the EMB Director. 3.1.3 Applicability Screening (Y or N) Considering that not all requirements may be applicable to an establishment, an applicability assessment shall be performed prior to evaluation. Each environmental performance criterion shall be reviewed and assessed whether it can be applied as criterion for a given establishment. If the criterion is determined to be applicable, write “Y” in the applicability screening column; otherwise, write “N”. 3.1.4 Applicable Weights An applicable criterion or a “Y” in the applicability screening column denotes that the weight of the criterion shall be used in the evaluation. On the other hand, an “N” denotes that no weight shall be used since the criterion is not applicable. The total applicable weight can be obtained by adding all applicable weights and noting the sum at the bottom cell under this column per module. Should there be

any inapplicable criterion/criteria, the corresponding weight shall be deducted from the total weight of the module. For instance, if the total weight is 100 and one criterion with a weight of 25 is not applicable to an establishment, the resulting total applicable weight shall be 75. 3.1.5 Total Number of Conditions and Number of Complied Conditions These fields are applicable only for environmental performance criterion pertaining to Legal/Regulatory Instrument (permit, license, certificate, clearance) conditions, analysis method recognitions, or Self-Monitoring Report (SMR) module submissions. List the conditions in the worksheet and evaluate each condition. Count the number of complied conditions and the total number of conditions. Indicate both counts in the worksheet.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



3.1.6 Records Presented / Remarks This part of the environmental performance rating worksheet is very important as this will justify the score of the establishment on the environmental performance criterion. Specific records shall be listed corresponding to the environmental performance criteria requirements. Should the required records to meet environmental performance criteria be unavailable, or if there are insufficiencies in the records; these should be indicated in this part of the rating worksheet. Leaving blanks or stating “Not Applicable” is not allowed. 3.1.7 Environmental Performance Score Details on how each criterion is scored are presented in Section 3.2 of this Procedural Manual. After scoring each criterion, the scores are then summed and noted at the bottom cell under this column per module. 3.1.8 Environmental Performance Rating The environmental performance rating in percentage (%) per module is obtained by dividing the total score for the module with the total applicable weight, then multiplying the quotient by 100. For cases where the resulting rating has decimal places, the score shall be rounded off to the nearest whole number. The overall environmental performance rating of the establishment is obtained by averaging the rating of the six modules. However, should an establishment get a failing rate (RED or BLACK) in any module; it shall warrant a failed grade and a RED or BLACK Color Code, depending on the overall rating. 3.2 SCORING PER ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE CRITERION This section discusses the process on how each environmental performance criterion shall be scored. Details per environmental module are presented in the succeeding subsections.

3.2.1 PD 1586 and its IRR This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for PD 1586 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines presented in Table 3.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Table 3. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for PD 1586 and its IRR


Criteria Weights


Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions



Score


Rating

PD 1586 With Valid ECC 5 N/A

Met ECC Conditions

25

Met EMP Commitments

25

Met EMoP Commitments

25

Submitted CMR or Module 5 of the SMR Semi-

annually

20

Total 100

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Valid ECC This criterion is applicable only to establishments covered by the EIS System. Give a score of five provided that all of the following requirements were met:

Establishment has an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC)

All facilities and infrastructure indicated in the Project Description are covered by the Scope of the ECC

Expansion in terms of daily production capacity or area and/or process modifications are covered by an ECC amendment or another ECC

Give a score of zero if it fails in any of the aforementioned requirements. Met ECC Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have an ECC. List and evaluate all environmentally-related ECC conditions during the establishment's operational phase. Give a score of 25 if the establishment satisfied all conditions. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 environmentally-related ECC conditions during the establishment's operational phase, and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20. However, if the establishment failed any of the requirements for a valid ECC, a score of zero shall be given. Met EMP Commitments This criterion refers to the commitments specified in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) submitted as part of the EIS. List and evaluate the EMP commitments related to the establishment's operational phase only. Give a score of 25 if the establishment satisfied all of the commitments specified in the EMP. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 EMP commitments and only eight commitments were satisfied; this means that 80

percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20. Met EMoP Commitments This criterion refers to the commitments specified in the Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP) submitted as part of the EIS. List and evaluate the EMoP commitments related to the establishment's operational phase only. Give a score of 25 if the establishment satisfied all of the commitments specified in the EMoP. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 EMoP commitments and only eight commitments were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20.

In listing the record(s) presented, the ECC number should be indicated as well as its corresponding scope and coverage. For establishments that have more than one ECC, all ECCs and their corresponding number, and scope and coverage should be indicated.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Submitted CMR or Module 5 of the SMR Semi-annually This criterion refers to the semi-annual submission of the Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR) or Module 5 of the SMR. Give a score of 20 if the establishment submitted the two CMRs of the previous year completely and on time. If only one CMR was submitted completely and on time, a score of 10 shall be given. If none, give a score of zero.

3.2.2 RA 6969 (Title II – Chemical Management)

This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA 6969, specifically Title II of DAO 1992-29: Toxic Chemical Substances. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines shown in Table 4.

In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 5 of the SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of the submitted

Module 5.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Table 4. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for RA 6969 (Title II – Toxic Chemical Substances)

Module Environmental

Performance Criteria Weights


Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions



Score


Rating

RA 6969 Title II – Chemical Management

With Valid SQI Clearance

5

N/A

Met SQI Clearance

Conditions 10

With Valid PMPIN Compliance Certificate

5

N/A

Met PMPIN Compliance Certificate Conditions

10

With Valid PCL

Compliance Certificate 5

N/A

Met PCL Compliance Certificate Conditions

10

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Mercury and

Mercury Compounds

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Mercury and

Mercury Compounds

10

With Valid Mercury and Mercury Compounds

Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Mercury and Mercury Compounds

Importation Clearance Conditions

10

With Valid CCO

Registration Certificate for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration

Certificate Conditions for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds

10

With Valid Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

10

PROCEDURAL MANUAL





Applicability Screening

(Y or N)

Applicable

Weights

Total No. of

Conditions

No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating

RA 6969 Title II –

Chemical Management

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate

for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing

Products

10

With Valid Asbestos Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Asbestos Importation Clearance

Conditions

10


for PCBs

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions

for PCBs

10

Submitted Complete PCB Inventory to EMB

15

N/A

With PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate

5

N/A

Met PCB Management

Plan Approval Certificate Conditions

10


for Lead and Lead Compounds

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Lead and Lead

Compounds

10

With Valid Lead and

Lead Compounds Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

10

PROCEDURAL MANUAL






(Y or N)

Applicable

Weights

Total No. of

Conditions

No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating


Chemical Management


for ODS 5

N/A


Certificate Conditions for ODS

10

With Valid Registration Certificate as Dealers, Retailers, and Resellers of ODS

5

N/A

With Valid ODS Pre-shipment Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met ODS PSIC Conditions

10

With Valid ODS Pre-

shipment Export Clearance

5

N/A

Met ODS PSEC

Conditions 10

With Valid Registration Certificate as Service

Provider of ODS

5

N/A

With Chemical Management Plan

10

N/A

With Contingency and Emergency Plan

10

N/A

With Complete SDS 5

Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Chemicals

5

Submitted Module 2A of the SMR Quarterly

10

Total 225

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Valid SQI Clearance This criterion refers to the Small Quantity Importation (SQI) Clearance requirements for importing, manufacturing, and distributing chemicals not listed in the Philippine Inventory of Chemicals and Chemical Substances (PICCS). It is applicable only to establishments importing chemicals not listed in the PICCS, not exceeding 1,000 kilograms (kg) per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) as chemical component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture. Check the inventory of chemicals used in the establishment and determine if each chemical is listed in the PICCS. Each chemical not listed in the PICCS, not exceeding 1,000 kg per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) chemical component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture, should have an SQI Clearance. If all chemicals have corresponding SQI Clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met SQI Clearance Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have an SQI Clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in each SQI Clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in all SQI Clearances. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are a total of 10 conditions for all SQI Clearances and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure SQI Clearance for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid PMPIN Compliance Certificate This criterion refers to the Pre-Manufacture and Pre-Importation Notification (PMPIN) Compliance Certificate requirements for chemicals not listed in the PICCS. It is applicable only to establishments importing chemicals not listed in the PICCS, exceeding 1,000 kg per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) chemical component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture. Check the inventory of chemicals used in the establishment and determine if each chemical is listed in the PICCS. Each chemical not listed in the PICCS, exceeding 1,000 kg per year as (1) pure chemical substance or (2) chemical component, in percentage of weight of a product and mixture, should have a PMPIN Compliance

Certificate. If all chemicals have corresponding PMPIN Compliance Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met PMPIN Compliance Certificate Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PMPIN Compliance Certificate. List and evaluate the conditions specified in each PMPIN Compliance Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in all PMPIN Compliance Certificates. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are a total of 10 conditions for all PMPIN Compliance Certificates and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure PMPIN Compliance Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Valid PCL Compliance Certificate This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, distributing, manufacturing, processing, and using chemicals under the Priority Chemical List (PCL). Check the inventory of chemicals imported, manufactured, and used in the establishment; and determine if the chemical is listed under the PCL. Each PCL chemical should have a PCL Compliance Certificate. If all PCL chemicals have corresponding PCL Compliance Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Met PCL Compliance Certificate Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PCL Compliance Certificate. List and evaluate the conditions specified in each PCL

Compliance Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in all PCL Compliance Certificates. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are a total of 10 conditions for all PCL Compliance Certificates and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure PCL Compliance Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Mercury and Mercury Compounds This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, distributing, manufacturing, processing, and using mercury and mercury compounds. Check the inventory of mercury and mercury compounds in the establishment. If each chemical has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Mercury and Mercury Compounds This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for Mercury and Mercury Compounds. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved,

giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

With Valid Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing mercury and mercury compounds. Check the inventory of mercury and mercury compounds in the establishment. If each imported chemical has a corresponding importation clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a mercury and mercury compounds importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the importation clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, distributing, manufacturing, processing, and using cyanide and cyanide compounds. Check the inventory of cyanide and cyanide compounds in the establishment. If each chemical has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds

This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

With Valid Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing cyanide and cyanide compounds. Check the inventory of cyanide and cyanide compounds in the establishment. If each imported chemical has a corresponding importation clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Met Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a cyanide and cyanide compounds importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the importation clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if

the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, distributing, manufacturing, and using asbestos and asbestos-containing products. Check the inventory of asbestos and asbestos-containing products in the establishment. If each chemical or product has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for Asbestos. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable chemicals or products, a score of zero shall be given.

With Valid Asbestos Importation Clearance This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing asbestos and asbestos-containing products. Check the inventory of asbestos and asbestos-containing products in the establishment. If each imported chemical or product has a corresponding importation clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Met Asbestos Importation Clearance Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have an asbestos importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the importation clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. If the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. However, if the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs This criterion is applicable only to establishments that use, operate, recycle, reprocess, store, treat, or dispose any equipment, materials, or wastes that are contaminated with, in direct contact with, or containing Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) oil, PCB-contaminated oil, PCB equipment, PCB-contaminated equipment, Non-PCB equipment, PCB-contaminated porous materials, PCB-contaminated non-porous materials, and PCB wastes. Check if the establishment uses, operates, recycles, reprocesses, stores, treats, or disposes any PCB-contaminated or PCB-containing equipment, materials, or wastes. If the establishment has secured a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for PCBs This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs. Evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure a CCO, a score of zero shall be given. Submitted Complete PCB Inventory to EMB This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs. Give a score of 15 if the inventory is complete and the establishment submitted the complete inventory within the prescribed deadline. However, if the inventory is incomplete and/or the establishment failed to secure a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs. Give a score of five if the establishment has secured PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate from the concerned EMB Regional Office (RO). Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for PCBs. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment has not yet submitted its PCB Management Plan for approval of the concerned EMB RO, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Lead and Lead Compounds This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, manufacturing, distributing, and using lead and lead compounds. Check the inventory of lead and lead compounds in the establishment. If each chemical has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Lead and Lead Compounds This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for Lead and Lead Compounds. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing lead and lead

compounds. Check the inventory of lead and lead compounds in the establishment. If each imported chemical has a corresponding importation clearance, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a lead and lead compounds importation clearance. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the importation clearance. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the importation clearance. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the importation clearance and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure importation clearance for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for ODS This criterion is applicable only to establishments importing, manufacturing, processing, exporting, distributing, and using ozone-depleting substances (ODS). Check the inventory of ODS in the establishment. If each chemical has a corresponding CCO Registration Certificate, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for ODS This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a CCO Registration Certificate for ODS. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the CCO Registration Certificate. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the CCO Registration Certificate and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure CCO Registration Certificate for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid Registration Certificate as Dealers, Retailers, and Resellers of ODS This criterion is applicable only to establishments that serve as dealers, retailers, and resellers of ODS. Give a score of five if the establishment has a valid registration certificate as dealer, retailer, and reseller of ODS. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid ODS Pre-Shipment Importation Clearance (PSIC) This criterion is applicable only to EMB-registered importers of ODS listed in Section 3 and Appendix I (Annex C) of DAO 2013-25: Revised Regulations on the Chemical Control Order for Ozone Depleting Substances. Check the inventory of ODS in the establishment. If all shipments for each chemical have a corresponding PSIC, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met ODS PSIC Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PSIC for ODS. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the PSIC. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the PSIC. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the PSIC and

only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure PSIC for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid ODS Pre-Shipment Export Clearance (PSEC) This criterion is applicable only to EMB-registered exporters of ODS listed in Section 3 of DAO 2013-25. Check the records of ODS exported by the establishment. If all shipments for each chemical have a corresponding PSEC, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met ODS Pre-Shipment Export Clearance Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PSEC for ODS. List and evaluate the conditions specified in the PSEC. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the PSEC. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are 10 conditions for the PSEC and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



establishment failed to secure PSEC for all applicable chemicals, a score of zero shall be given. With Valid Registration Certificate as Service Provider for ODS This criterion is applicable only to establishments performing the installation, maintenance, service, repair, and/or operation of ODS-using equipment. Give a score of five if the establishment has a valid registration certificate. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. With Chemical Management Plan This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by Title II of DAO 1992-29 and refers to the availability of chemical management plan of the establishment to implement precautionary health, safety, and environmental mitigation measures. Check if the establishment has a Chemical Management Plan. If the establishment has a Plan and satisfied the guidelines of DENR, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. With Contingency and Emergency Plan This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by Title II of DAO 1992-29 and refers to the availability of contingency and emergency plans of the establishment to mitigate chemicals spills and accidents. Check if the establishment has a Contingency and Emergency Plan. If the establishment has a Plan and satisfied the guidelines of DENR, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. With Complete SDS This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by Title II of DAO 1992-29 and refers to the availability of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for each chemical used by the establishment. Check the inventory of chemicals used in the establishment and determine if each chemical has a corresponding and complete SDS. Completeness of the SDS shall be based on the requirements of Joint DTI-DENR-DA-DOF-DOH-DILG-DOLE-DOTC Administrative Order (JAO) 2009-01 or The Adoption and Implementation of the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals. If all chemicals have corresponding and complete SDS, give a score of five. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 20 chemicals and only 12 chemicals had corresponding and complete

SDS; this means that 60 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of three. Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Chemicals This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by Title II of DAO 1992-29 and refers to an establishment’s adherence with chemical storage and labeling requirements. Using the Chemical Management Plan and/or SDS of each chemical, check if the storage requirements are observed by the establishment. In addition, check if the chemicals are labeled as prescribed by JAO 2009-001. If all chemicals are stored and labeled appropriately, give a score of five. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 20 chemicals and only 12 chemicals were stored and labeled appropriately; this means that 60 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of three.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Submitted Module 2A of the SMR Quarterly This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by Title II of DAO 1992-29 and refers to the quarterly submission of Module 2A of the SMR. Give a score of 10 if the establishment submitted Module 2A of the four SMRs of the previous year completely and on time. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module 2A and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of five.

3.2.3 RA 6969 (Title III – Hazardous Waste Management) This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA 6969, specifically DAO 2013-22: Revised Procedures and Standards for the Management of Hazardous Wastes (Revising DAO 2004-36) and JAO 2013-09-001. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines presented in Table 5.

In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 2A of the SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of the submitted Module 2A.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Table 5. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for RA 6969 (Title III – Hazardous Waste Management)




Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions



Score


Rating

RA 6969 Title III – Hazardous Waste

Management

Registered Hazardous Waste Generator

5

N/A

Registered Hazardous

Waste Transporter 5

N/A

Registered Hazardous Waste TSD Facility

5

N/A

Maintained an Inventory of Hazardous/Special Wastes

10

N/A

Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Hazardous/Special Wastes

10

N/A

Contracted DENR-registered Transporters

10

N/A

Contracted DENR-Registered Treaters

10

N/A

Complied with Hazardous Waste

Transport Manifest System

10

N/A

Contracted Transporters

have Valid Permit to Transport

10

N/A

Treated

Hazardous/Special Wastes have Corresponding COT

10

N/A

Has Established an Emergency Contingency Plan

5

N/A

With Trained Staff and

Personnel on Hazardous Waste Management, Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring

Procedures

10

N/A

Submitted Module 2B of the SMR

10

Total 110

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Registered Hazardous Waste Generator This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by DAO 2013-22. Check if the establishment is registered as a hazardous waste generator. In addition, check if all hazardous wastes generated were listed in the submitted hazardous waste generator form. Give a score of five if the establishment satisfied both requirements. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter This criterion is applicable only to establishments transporting hazardous wastes per DAO 2013-22. Check if the establishment is registered as a hazardous waste transporter. In addition, check if all transport vehicles used in transporting hazardous wastes were listed in the submitted hazardous waste transporter form. Give a score of five if the establishment satisfied both requirements. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Registered Hazardous Waste TSD Facility This criterion is applicable only to establishments that are treating, storing, and/or disposing hazardous wastes per DAO 2013-22. Check if the establishment is registered as a hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) facility. In addition, check if all TSD process/areas were included in the submitted hazardous waste TSD form. Give a score of five if the establishment satisfied both requirements. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Maintained an Inventory of Hazardous/Special Wastes This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by DAO 2013-22. Check if the establishment has an inventory of hazardous/special waste generated. The

inventory should include the amount of waste generated and stored by the establishment as well as the amount of waste treated/disposed offsite. If the inventory is balanced and complete, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Hazardous/Special Wastes This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by DAO 2013-22. Check if the storage and labeling requirements prescribed by DAO 2013-22 were observed by the establishment. If all hazardous/special wastes were stored and labeled appropriately, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Contracted DENR-Registered Transporters This criterion refers to the contracted hazardous waste transporters of the establishment. Check if the contracted hazardous waste transporters are registered with DENR to transport the hazardous wastes hauled from the establishment. If all contracted hazardous waste transporters are registered, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

A hazardous waste TSD Facility is also a hazardous waste generator. Hence, such establishment should have Registration Certificates as generator and as TSD Facility. Similarly, a hazardous waste generator treating its own generated hazardous wastes must also register as a TSD Facility (Category A). In addition, a hazardous waste TSD Facility can be a hazardous waste Transporter. In this case, such establishment should have Registration Certificates as generator, as Transporter, and as TSD Facility.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Contracted DENR-Registered Treaters This criterion refers to the contracted hazardous waste treaters of the establishment. Check if the contracted hazardous waste treaters are registered with DENR to treat the hazardous wastes of the establishment. If all contracted hazardous waste treaters are registered, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Complied with Hazardous Waste Transport Manifest System This criterion refers to the establishment’s compliance with the Hazardous Waste Transport Manifest System. Check if all hazardous waste transactions were covered by corresponding manifest forms. Specifically, check each manifest if it satisfied the following requirements:

Completely filled up Section A: Generator

Completely filled up Section B: Transporters

Completely filled up Section C: Treater

Proof of receipt of EMB If all of the above requirements were met for all manifests, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Contracted Transporters have Valid Permit to Transport This criterion refers to the availability of Valid Permit to Transport for hazardous waste transported off the establishment by contracted hazardous waste transporters. Check if all hazardous waste transactions were covered by corresponding permit to transport and the type of hazardous wastes written in the permit were the same as the type of hazardous wastes transported. In addition, check if the amount of hazardous wastes written in the permit was greater than or equal to the amount of hazardous wastes transported. If all of the aforementioned requirements were met, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Treated Hazardous/Special Wastes have Corresponding COT This criterion refers to the availability of Certificate of Treatment (COT) for hazardous/special wastes treated from the establishment by contracted hazardous waste treaters. Check if all hazardous waste transactions were covered by

corresponding COTs and if the type and amount of hazardous wastes written in the COT were the same as the type and amount of hazardous wastes written in the manifest. If all of the aforementioned requirements were met, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Has Established an Emergency Contingency Plan This criterion refers to the availability of emergency contingency plans of the establishment to mitigate and combat hazardous waste spills and accidents. If the establishment's Emergency Contingency Plan satisfied the requirements prescribed by DAO 2013-22, give a score of five. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Trained Staff and Personnel on Hazardous Waste Management, Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring Procedures This criterion refers to the availability of trained personnel on Hazardous Waste Management, Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring Procedures, as required by DAO 2013-22. Check how many personnel are in charge of handling hazardous wastes. From these, check if the designated personnel have relevant trainings on Hazardous Waste Management, Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring Procedures. If all designated personnel have the relevant trainings (minimum of 8 hours of training), give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Submitted Module 2B of the SMR This criterion is applicable to all establishments covered by DAO 2013-22 and refers to the submission of Module 2B of the SMR. Give a score of 10 if the establishment submitted Module 2B of the SMR of the previous year completely and on time in accordance to Section 3.2 (Table 3.2) of DAO 2013-22. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if an establishment is required to submit the SMR quarterly, and only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module 2B and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of five.

3.2.4 RA 8749 and its IRR This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA 8749 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines shown in Table 6.

In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 2B of the SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of the submitted

Module 2B.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Table 6. Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for RA 8749 and its IRR




Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions



Score


Rating

RA 8749 With Valid PTO for All Air Pollution Source and Control Installation

5

N/A

Met PTO Conditions 10

Conducted Testing and Analysis for Emission

Source using EMB-Registered Third Party Source Emission Testing Firm and EMB-

Recognized Laboratory Respectively

15

N/A

Compliant CEMS

and/or COMS Installations

10

N/A

Conducted CEMS/COMS Audit

Annually with Compliant Results

10

N/A

Complied with NESSAP 40 N/A

Conducted Ambient Air Quality Monitoring with Compliant Results

40

N/A

Submitted Module 4 of the SMR Quarterly

10

Total 140

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Valid PTO for All Air Pollution Source and Control Installation This criterion refers to the availability of Permit to Operate (PTO) for all air pollution sources and air pollution control installation of an establishment. Give a score of five if all sources and installations of the establishment are in the PTO or have corresponding PTO. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met PTO Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a PTO for air pollution sources and/or air pollution control installation. List and evaluate conditions related to the establishment's PTO. Give a score of 10 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the PTO. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of eight. However, if the establishment failed to secure PTO for all sources and installations, a score of zero shall be given. Conducted Testing and Analysis for Emission Source using EMB-Registered Third Party Source Emission Testing Firm and EMB-Recognized Laboratory Respectively This criterion refers to the utilization of EMB-registered third party source emission testing firm and EMB-recognized laboratory for source emission testing and analysis, respectively. Check if emission testing was conducted for all required parameters by an EMB-registered third party source emission testing firm. In addition, check if the analysis was conducted by an EMB-recognized laboratory. If all the above requirements were met, give a score of 15. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are five parameters to be tested and the third party source emission testing firm is only registered to conduct testing for four parameters; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 12. Similarly, if there are five parameters to be analyzed and the laboratory is only recognized to conduct analysis for four parameters; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 12. On the other hand, if there are five parameters to be tested and analyzed, and the third party source emission testing firm is only registered to conduct testing of four parameters, while the laboratory is only recognized to conduct testing of three parameters, this means

that 60 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of nine. Compliant CEMS and/or COMS Installations This criterion is applicable only to establishments utilizing Continuous Emission Monitoring System (CEMS) and/or Continuous Opacity Monitoring System (COMS). It refers to the adherence of an establishment’s CEMS and/or COMS with the requirements stipulated in the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 60 Appendix B. Give a score of 10 if the CEMS and/or COMS installed are compliant with the requirements of USEPA 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix B. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Conducted CEMS/COMS Audit Annually with Compliant Results

This criterion refers to the conduct of audit annually for the establishment’s CEMS and/or COMS. Check if the audit was conducted in the presence of authorized EMB personnel. In addition, check if the results of the audit were compliant with the National Emission Standards for Source Specific Air Pollutants (NESSAP). If all the aforementioned requirements were met, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Complied with NESSAP

This criterion refers to the establishment’s compliance with the NESSAP. Give a score of 40 if all emission sources met the NESSAP for all appropriate parameters. A score of zero shall then be given if any of the following was observed:

Emission results were not compliant with the NESSAP

Testing was not conducted by an EMB-registered third party source emission testing firm

Analysis was not conducted by an EMB-recognized laboratory

Audit was not conducted in the presence of authorized EMB personnel and results were not compliant

For emission results that were all compliant, calculate how much lower the results were compared to the NESSAP. An establishment with emission results lower than the NESSAP by at least 20 percent may be a candidate for a GREEN color code. Conducted Ambient Air Quality Monitoring with Compliant Results This criterion is applicable only to establishments where source emission testing is not possible. Give a score of 40 if the results of ambient air quality monitoring met the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Source Specific Air Pollutants from Industrial Sources/Operations for all appropriate parameters. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Submitted Module 4 of the SMR Quarterly This criterion refers to the quarterly submission of Module 4 of the SMR. Give a score of 10 if the establishment submitted Module 4 of the four SMRs of the previous year completely and on time. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module 4 and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of five.

3.2.5 RA 9275 and its IRR This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA 9275 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines presented in Table 7.

In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 4 of the SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of the submitted

Module 4.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL







Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions



Score


Rating

RA 9275 With Valid DP for All Discharge Points

10

N/A

Met DP Conditions 25

Conducted Analysis for Effluent Source using EMB-Approved Method

or EMB-Recognized Laboratory

15

Complied with Effluent Standards

40

N/A

Observed Proper Onsite Treatment and Disposal of Effluent

40

N/A

Observed Proper Offsite Transport, Storage, Treatment, and Disposal

of ESS

40

N/A


10

Total 180

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Valid DP for All Discharge Points This criterion refers to the availability of Discharge Permit (DP) for all discharge points. Give a score of 10 if all discharge points of the establishment are in the DP or have corresponding DP. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Met DP Conditions This criterion is applicable only to establishments required to have a DP for discharge points. List and evaluate conditions related to the establishment's DP. Give a score of 25 if the establishment satisfied all conditions specified in the DP. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 conditions and only eight conditions were satisfied; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 20. However, if the establishment failed to secure DP for all discharge points, a score of zero shall be given. Conducted Analysis for Effluent Source using EMB-Approved Method or EMB-Recognized Laboratory This criterion refers to the utilization of EMB-approved method of analysis or EMB-recognized laboratory for effluent source. Give a score of 15 if the effluent analysis was conducted for all required parameters using EMB-approved methods or by an EMB-recognized laboratory. If not, calculate the percentage of compliance. For instance, if there are five parameters to be analyzed and the method of analysis for one parameter is not EMB-approved; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 12. Similarly, if there are five parameters to be analyzed and the laboratory is only recognized to conduct analysis for four parameters; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 12. Observed Proper Onsite Treatment and Disposal of Effluent This criterion is applicable only to establishments that treat and dispose effluent onsite. Give a score of 40 if the establishment's effluent results were compliant with the effluent standards. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. For effluent results that were all compliant, calculate how much lower the results were compared to the effluent standards. An establishment with effluent results lower than the effluent standards by at least 20 percent may be a candidate for a

GREEN color code. Observed Proper Offsite Transport, Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of ESS This criterion is applicable only to establishments that have their effluent, sewage, and/or septage (ESS) transported, treated, stored, and/or disposed offsite. Check if the establishment observed the following:

Contracted EMB-registered ESS Transporter

Contracted EMB-registered ESS TSD Facility

Complied with ESS Manifest System

Contracted ESS Transporters have Valid Permit to Transport

Secured COT for the ESS If all the above requirements were met, give a score of 40. Otherwise a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Submitted Module 3 of the SMR Quarterly This criterion refers to the quarterly submission of Module 3 of the SMR. Give a score of 10 if the establishment submitted Module 3 of the four SMRs of the previous year completely and on time. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module 3 and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of five.

3.2.6 RA 9003 and its IRR This subsection presents the environmental performance rating worksheet for RA 9003 and its IRR. Scoring per criterion shall be according to the guidelines shown in Table 8.

In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 3 of the SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of submitted Module 3.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL







Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions



Score


Rating

RA 9003 With Documented Solid Waste Management Program

10

N/A

Has Provision for Solid Waste Segregation at Source

20

N/A

Practiced Solid Waste Segregation at Source

10

N/A

Operated and Maintained Appropriate

Storage Facility with Proper Labeling

10

N/A

Used Appropriate

Disposal Method for Biodegradable Wastes

10

N/A

Practiced Proper

Management of Recyclable Wastes

10

N/A

Used Appropriate

Disposal Facility for Residual Wastes

10

N/A

Operated and Maintained Appropriate

Composting Facility

10

N/A

Maintained Records of Weights or Volume and

Types of Solid Wastes

10

N/A

With Trained Staff and Personnel Handling

Solid Wastes

10


10

Total 120

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



With Documented Solid Waste Management Program This criterion refers to an establishment’s documentation of their solid waste management program. Give a score of 10 if the establishment properly documented its solid waste management program. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Has Provision for Solid Waste Segregation at Source This criterion refers to an establishment’s provision for solid waste segregation at source. Give a score of 20 if the establishment provided appropriate containers or receptacles (i.e. bins) for the segregation of each type of solid waste at source (i.e., biodegradable, recyclable, residual, non-traditional). If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 types of solid wastes in the establishment and appropriate containers for only eight types of solid wastes were provided; this means that 80 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of 16.

Practiced Solid Waste Segregation at Source This criterion refers to an establishment’s practice of waste segregation at source. Give a score of 10 if the establishment’s employees practice solid waste segregation for each type of solid waste at source. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if there are 10 types of solid wastes in the establishment and only eight were properly segregated, this means that 80 percent of the applicable was achieved, giving a score of eight.

Operated and Maintained Appropriate Solid Waste Storage Facility This criterion is applicable to all establishments. Give a score of 10 if the establishment has appropriately operated and maintained its solid waste storage facility. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

Used Appropriate Disposal Method for Biodegradable Wastes This criterion refers to an establishment’s disposal of biodegradable wastes. Give a score of 10 if the establishment used the appropriate disposal method for its biodegradable wastes. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Practiced Proper Management of Recyclable Wastes This criterion refers to an establishment’s management of recyclable wastes. Give a

score of 10 if the establishment properly managed its recyclable wastes. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Used Appropriate Disposal Facility for Residual Wastes This criterion refers to an establishment’s usage of appropriate disposal facility for residual wastes. Give a score of 10 if the establishment used an appropriate disposal facility of residual wastes. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. Operated and Maintained Appropriate Composting Facility This criterion is applicable only to establishments that operate and maintain a composting facility inside their facility. Give a score of 10 if the establishment has appropriately operated and maintained their composting facility. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Maintained Records of Weights or Volume and Types of Solid Wastes This criterion refers to an establishment’s recording of solid wastes generated. Check if the establishment has maintained records of weights or volume and types of solid waste generated. The record should include the amount of waste generated and stored by the establishment as well as treated/disposed offsite. If the inventory is balanced and complete, give a score of 10. Otherwise, a score of zero shall be given. With Trained Staff and Personnel Handling Solid Wastes This criterion refers to the availability of trained personnel on solid waste management. Check how many personnel are in charge of handling solid waste. From these, check if the designated personnel have appropriate trainings on solid waste management. If all designated personnel have the appropriate trainings, give a score of 10. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, there are 20 designated personnel and only 18 have appropriate trainings on solid waste management, this means that 90 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of nine. Submitted Module 6 of the SMR Quarterly This criterion refers to the quarterly submission of Module 6 of the SMR. Give a score of 10 if the establishment submitted Module 6 of the four SMRs of the previous year completely and on time. If not, calculate the percentage of satisfaction. For instance, if only two SMRs were submitted with complete Module 6 and on time; this means that 50 percent of the applicable weight was achieved, giving a score of five.

3.3 RATING PROTOCOL This section discusses the process flow during the implementation of the IERS. As illustrated in Figure 1, EMB Central Office (CO) shall be responsible in planning and overseeing the whole process. In addition, they will serve as the Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) of the IERS. On the other hand, EMB ROs shall execute the actual fieldwork (i.e. rating the establishments) and compile the necessary records. Details of each process of the IERS are discussed in the succeeding subsections.

In listing the record(s) presented, indicate the exact dates when Module 6 of the SMR was submitted. Also indicate the level of completeness of the submitted Module 6.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Figure 1 IERS Rating Protocol

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



3.3.1 Identification of Priority Sector EMB CO shall identify the priority sector(s) to be evaluated under the IERS for the upcoming grading year through a consultative meeting. Pursuant to Section 2.0 of this Procedural Manual, priority sector(s) shall be identified based on multi-media concerns (water quality, air quality, chemical, and waste management concerns) and significance with regards to economic development either in the national or regional level. Priority identification shall be done two months before the launch of the IERS, and shall be carried out during the fourth quarter of the previous grading year. 3.3.2 Assessment of Applicable Criteria for Establishments to be Rated Pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Procedural Manual, EMB ROs shall assess the applicable criteria for each establishment to be rated. The assessment shall be reflected on the Applicability Screening and Applicable Weight columns on the worksheet (see Annex 1). Non-applicable criteria shall be ticked with an “N” mark under the Applicability Screening column, while an “n/a” mark shall be placed under the Applicable Weight column. The total applicable weight shall be obtained by adding all applicable weights and noting the sum at the bottom cell under this column per environmental module. The assessment of applicable criteria is considered a part of the Environmental Performance Rating exercise proper, and shall be done within the second quarter of the current grading year. 3.3.3 Assessment of Environmental Performance The assessment shall cover the environmental performance of the establishment during the previous year. The EMB RO representative shall gather all necessary data, including but not limited to effluent/emission test data, permits/licenses/certificates, emergency plans, corresponding SMR modules, and similar items (refer to Annex 1 for a complete listing of the criteria per module). Based on the gathered data and using

the environmental performance rating worksheet, EMB RO shall perform the actual rating exercise. Throughout the exercise, EMB RO shall conduct meeting/s with the establishment being rated as necessary to clear up any confusion and/or miscommunications immediately. Grading shall follow the guidelines outlined in Sections 3.2 of this Procedural Manual. Upon completion of the grading exercise, the color code corresponding to the resultant grade shall be noted. EMB RO shall then forward to EMB CO the completely filled-up Environmental Performance Worksheet noting the initial eco-watch rating and color codes of the establishments as well as pertinent documents used during the evaluation process. It should be emphasized that the results from the rating exercise by EMB ROs are initial only, and are still subject for review by EMB CO. The Environmental Performance Assessment process shall be accomplished within the second quarter of the current grading year.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



3.3.4 Review and Validation of Environmental Performance Rating EMB CO shall review and validate the Environmental Performance Rating to ensure that the evaluation process has been conducted in accordance with the guidelines and procedures set forth in this Procedural Manual. In the case where EMB CO ascertains substantial errors in the rating process, EMB CO shall notify the corresponding EMB RO and may conduct on-site validation. This process shall be accomplished within the third quarter of the current grading year. EMB CO shall review and validate the ratings of EMB ROs only for the first three years of implementing the revised guideline and procedural manual of the IERS. After the said time period, EMB CO shall conduct review and validation after every three years. This is to ensure adherence to the IERS protocol and to institute a monitoring mechanism on the EMB ROs’ implementation of the IERS. 3.3.5 Notification of Establishment Regarding Their Environmental

Performance Rating After review, EMB CO shall send a letter of notification (see Annex 2 for letter template) to the establishment containing their Environmental Performance Rating. The letters are to be distributed on or before January 31 of the following year. Validated environmental performance ratings are considered final (for the current grading year). 4.0 EVALUATION OF THE IERS To evaluate the effectiveness and relevance of the IERS, the implementation shall be subject to regular monitoring, evaluation, and/or formal review by EMB. The following aspects shall be monitored and evaluated:

Institutionalization Aspect The extent and stability of the institutionalization, in terms of mainstreaming, of the IERS shall be evaluated every six months for the first three years of evaluation. After which, the evaluation can be done every two to three years. Such evaluation shall cover the following elements:

Staffing Level – Evaluation of the number of personnel assigned or designated to implement the IERS at the EMB CO and RO. At the minimum, one personnel in EMB CO and one in each EMB RO shall be exclusively assigned (full-time) to manage and/or implement the IERS.

Capability and Training – Evaluation of the capability and capability

building activities for personnel assigned or designated to implement the IERS. The attendance of staff directly involved in the IERS shall be a minimum of one training per year. Such training shall be in the subject area directly related to public disclosure and/or compliance monitoring.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



Program Funding – Evaluation of the adequacy of funding and other

resources allocation for the implementation of the IERS. The minimum benchmark shall be the inclusion of a regular item in the budget program at EMB CO and ROs exclusively for the IERS by the second year of implementation.

Operationalization Aspect The effectiveness and efficiency of the implementation of the IERS shall be evaluated every year. Such evaluation shall cover the following elements:

Overall Coverage – Evaluation of the expansion of the coverage of the IERS. The evaluation shall be based on the schedule of implementation phases as issued by EMB.

Sector Coverage – Evaluation of the expansion of the sectoral coverage

of the IERS. The minimum benchmark for this element is the addition of one sector every year in each region.

Establishment Coverage – Evaluation of the number of establishments

covered by the IERS. The minimum benchmark for this element is an increase of at least five percent every year in the number of establishments covered by the IERS.

Social Acceptability Aspect The extent of social acceptability of the IERS shall be evaluated every year. Such evaluation shall cover the following elements:

Timeliness – Evaluation of the timeliness of public disclosure under the IERS. The minimum benchmark for this element is the release of rating exercise as per prescribed schedules on a regular basis.

Participation – Evaluation of the desirability of participation in the

IERS. One of the possible benchmarks for this element is the number

of establishments voluntarily desiring participation in the IERS. These evaluation criteria are not exhaustive or definitive. Revisions and/or additional criteria/benchmarks may be undertaken to fine tune the evaluation process. At the minimum, these evaluation criteria shall be reviewed every three years to assess their appropriateness and/or relevance. 5.0 REVIEW AND REVISION Any amendments, revisions, or changes to DAO 20AA-ZZ shall trigger the review and amendment or revision of this Procedural Manual. On the other hand, amendment, revision, or change to this Procedural Manual may not require the amendment or revision of DAO 20AA-ZZ, provided that the amendment or revision of this Procedural Manual is still consistent with DAO 20AA-ZZ.

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



REFERENCES DENR Administrative Order No. 1990-34 Revised Water Usage and

Classification/Water Quality Criteria Amending Section Nos. 68 and 69, Chapter III of the 1978 NPCC Rules and Regulations

DENR Administrative Order No. 1990-35 Revised Effluent Regulations of 1990,

Revising and Amending the Effluent Regulations of 1982 DENR Administrative Order No. 1992-29 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR)

of RA 6969 DENR Administrative Order No. 1997-38 Chemical Control Order for Mercury and

Mercury Compounds DENR Administrative Order No. 1997-39 Chemical Control Order for Cyanide and

Cyanide Compounds DENR Administrative Order No. 2000-02 Chemical Control Order for Asbestos DENR Administrative Order No. 2000-82 Integrated Air Quality Improvement

Framework-Air Quality Control Action Plan DENR Administrative Order No. 2001-34 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR)

of RA 9003 DENR Administrative Order No. 2001-81 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR)

of RA 8749 DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-26 Revised Industrial EcoWatch System

Amending Implementing Guidelines of DAO 1998-51 Series of 1998 DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-27 Amending DAO 26, DAO 29, and DAO

2001-81 Among Others on the Preparation and Submission of Self-Monitoring Reports (SMR)DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-30 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of PD 1586

DENR Administrative Order No. 2004-26 Amending Rule XIX of DAO 2000-81 DENR Administrative Order No. 2005-10 Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR)

of RA 9275 DENR Administrative Order No. 2005-27 Revised Priority Chemical List DENR Administrative Order No. 2007-22 Guidelines on the Requirements for

Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS) and Other Acceptable Protocols, Thereby Modifying and Clarifying Certain Provisions of Section 5, Rule X of DAO 2000-81 and Other Related Provisions

DENR Administrative Order No. 2013-22 Revised Procedures and Standards for the

Management of Hazardous Wastes (Revising DAO 2004-36). DENR Administrative Order No. 2013-24 Chemical Control Order (CCO) for Lead

and Lead Compounds

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



DENR Administrative Order No. 2013-25 Revised Regulations on the Chemical Control Order for Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)

DENR Administrative Order No. 20XX-XX Revised Chemical Control Order (CCO)

for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Amending DAO 2004-01 DENR Administrative Order No. 20YY-YY Guidelines for the Transport, Treatment,

Storage, and Disposal of Effluent, Sewage, and/or Septage Offsite EMB Memorandum Circular No. 2007-003 Policy on Compliance and Permitting for

Industrial Facilities Relating to Air Quality Presidential Decree No. 1586 Establishing an Environmental Impact Statement

System including Other Environmental Management Related Measures and for other Purposes

Republic Act No. 6969 Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear Wastes

Control Act of 1990 Republic Act No. 8749 Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999 Republic Act No. 9003 Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000 Republic Act No. 9275 Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 Revised Procedural Manual for DENR Administrative Order No. 2003-30

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RATING WORKSHEET


Criteria

Weights Applicability

Screening

(Y or N)

Applicable Weights Total No. of Conditions

No. of Complied Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks

Environmental Performance Score


Rating

PD 1586 With ECC 5

N/A

Met ECC

Conditions 25

Met EMP

Commitments 25

Met EMoP Commitments

25

Submitted CMR or Module 5 of the SMR Semi-annually

20

Total 100

PROCEDURAL MANUAL






(Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating


Chemical Management

With Valid SQI Clearance 5 N/A

Met SQI Clearance Conditions

10

With Valid PMPIN Compliance Certificate

5

N/A

Met PMPIN Compliance Certificate Conditions

10

With Valid PCL Compliance

Certificate 5

N/A

Met PCL Compliance Certificate Conditions

10

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Mercury and Mercury Compounds

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Mercury and Mercury Compounds Conditions

10

With Valid Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Mercury and Mercury Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

10

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds

10

With Valid Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Cyanide and Cyanide Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

10

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products

5

N/A

PROCEDURAL MANUAL





Applicability

Screening (Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of

Complied Conditions

Records

Presented/ Remarks

Environmental

Performance Score

Environmental

Performance Rating

RA 6969

Title II – Chemical Management


Certificate Conditions for Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products

10

With Valid Asbestos

Importation Clearance 5

N/A

Met Asbestos Importation

Clearance Conditions 10

With Valid CCO Registration

Certificate for PCBs 5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for PCBs

10

Submitted Complete PCB

Inventory to EMB 15

N/A

With PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate

5

N/A

Met PCB Management Plan Approval Certificate Conditions

10

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for Lead and Lead Compounds

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for Lead and Lead Compounds

10

With Valid Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met Lead and Lead Compounds Importation Clearance Conditions

10

With Valid CCO Registration Certificate for ODS

5

N/A

Met CCO Registration Certificate Conditions for ODS

10

With Valid Registration Certificate as Dealers, Retailers, and Resellers of ODS

5

N/A

PROCEDURAL MANUAL





Applicability

Screening (Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of

Complied Conditions

Records

Presented/ Remarks

Environmental

Performance Score

Environmental

Performance Rating

RA 6969

Title II – Chemical Management

With Valid ODS Pre-

shipment Importation Clearance

5

N/A

Met ODS PSIC Conditions 10

With Valid ODS Pre-shipment Export Clearance

5

N/A

Met ODS PSEC Conditions 10

With Valid Registration

Certificate as Service Provider of ODS

5

N/A

With Chemical Management

Plan 10

N/A

With Contingency and Emergency Plan

10

N/A

With Complete SDS 5

Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Chemicals

5

Submitted Module 2A of the SMR Quarterly

10

Total 225

PROCEDURAL MANUAL






(Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating

RA 6969 Title III –

Hazardous Waste Management

Registered Hazardous Waste Generator

5

N/A

Registered Hazardous Wastes Transporter

5

N/A

Registered Hazardous

Wastes TSD Facility 5

N/A

Maintained an Inventory of Hazardous/Special

Wastes

10

N/A

Observed Proper Storage and Labeling of Hazardous/Special

Wastes

10

N/A

Contracted DENR-registered Transporters

10

N/A

Contracted DENR-registered Treaters

10

N/A

Complied with

Hazardous Waste Transport Manifest System

10

N/A

Contracted Transporters have Valid Permit to Transport

10

N/A

Treated Hazardous/Special Wastes have Corresponding COT

10

N/A

Has Established an Emergency Contingency Plan

5

N/A

With Trained Staff and Personnel on Hazardous Waste Management,

Contingency Plan, and Compliance Monitoring Procedures

10

N/A

Submitted Module 2B of

the SMR 10

Total 110

PROCEDURAL MANUAL






(Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating

RA 8749 With Valid PTO for All Air Pollution Source and

Control Installation

5

N/A

Met PTO Conditions 10

Conducted Testing and

Analysis for Emission Source using EMB-Registered Third Party Source Emission Testing

Firm and EMB-recognized Laboratory Respectively

15

N/A

Compliant CEMS and/or COMS Installations

10

N/A

Conducted

CEMS/COMS Audit Annually with Compliant Results

10

N/A

Complied with NESSAP 40 N/A

Conducted Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and

Results with Compliant Results

40

N/A

Submitted Module 4 of

the SMR Quarterly 10

Total 140

PROCEDURAL MANUAL




Criteria

Weights Applicability

Screening

(Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating

RA 9275 With Valid DP for All Discharge Points

10

N/A

Met DP Conditions 25

Conducted Analysis for Effluent Source

using EMB-Approved Method or EMB-Recognized Laboratory

15

Complied with Effluent Standards

40

N/A

Observed Proper

Onsite Treatment and Disposal of Effluent

40

N/A

Observed Proper Offsite Transport, Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of ESS

40

N/A


10

Total 180

PROCEDURAL MANUAL






(Y or N)

Applicable Weights


No. of Complied

Conditions

Records Presented/

Remarks


Score


Rating

RA 9003 With Documented Solid Waste Management

Program

10

N/A

Has Provision for Solid Waste Segregation at Source

20

Practiced Solid Waste Segregation at Source

10

Operated and Maintained Appropriate Storage Facility with Proper Labeling

10

N/A

Used Appropriate Disposal

Method for Biodegradable Wastes

10

N/A

Practiced Proper

Management of Recyclable Wastes

10

N/A

Used Appropriate Disposal

Facility for Residual Wastes 10

N/A

Operated and Maintained Appropriate Composting

Facility

10

N/A

Maintained Records of Weights or Volume and Types of Solid Wastes

10

N/A

With Trained Staff and Personnel Handling Solid Wastes

10


10

Total 120

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by: __________________ _________________ _________________ Name and Position PCD Chief Regional Director

PROCEDURAL MANUAL



NOTICE OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RATING FORMAT

(To be printed on DENR Letterhead) Name/Title of Managing Head Name of Establishment Address ATTENTION: Name/Title of Pollution Control Officer Dear Sir/Madam: Greetings. This is to officially inform you that your establishment located at place/address of establishment has been pre-selected as part of our Industrial EcoWatch Rating System (IERS). Based on our evaluation and findings, the said establishment has been rated as: Attached is the filled up Environmental Performance Rating Worksheet for your establishment. In case you need any clarification/s, you may visit our office or

contact name/title/unit of ECOWATCH focal person for more details. The rating shall be considered as final if we do not receive any objection/s from you within the next 30 days. We look forward to your continued cooperation and compliance. Yours truly, Name of Regional Director Regional Director

P U B L I C D I S C L O S U R E R A T I N G Name of Establishment

Address/Location of Establishment

Rating

For the Period Month to Month, Year

procedural manual for dao 20aa-zz manual for dao 20aa-zz industrial ecowatch rating system...

Documents