Problem Orientated PartnershipsTackling Local Priorities

Gary Salisbury - PC 1623

Sue Roach Community Safety Manager

2000 2002 2005 2006 2007

EXPERIENCE

Ditch the Dealer

OverviewMOPPIN – NIM POP

The Problem

•In the beginning - position of weakness

•Process for the way forward:

Scanning Analysis Response Assessment

Scanning

– Unsustainable tenancies– Crime attractor/generator– Service provider ‘hotspot’– Gang culture: FPOG– Deprived community– Overt drug dealing/taking– Under used community

centre– No diversionary activities– Blame culture

Scanning

Analysis

• Long process - very important

• Listen

1. Community

2. Stakeholders/Organisations

• Identify local priorities

OffendersOffenders VictimsVictims

LocationLocation

AnalysisProblem Analysis Triangle

HeartHeartof the of the

ProblemProblem

Quantitative analysis

Average Cost of BIAD, Damage and ASB for Jan, Feb & March 2004/5(Source: The Economic & Social Cost of Crime, Home Office Research paper 217)

$30,560

$20,650$48,323

BIAD

Damage

ASB

Quantitative analysis

Environmental Cleaning Costs £3878.26 for Jan, Feb, March 2004/05

Community Consultation

Essential Broad methods

PACT TASK FORCE

Alternative methodsOption StudyMAPPINEVA

Qualitative Analysis

• CGA Option Study – Door to Door Survey – Dedicated Staff– Response of 80%– Areas covered:

• Length occupancy• Involvement in Community• Problems on Estate

Environmental Visual Audit

Qualitative Analysis

ConclusionNeighbourhood Policing/Neighbourhood

Management Providing the public with access to local policing Offering opportunities to influence local priorities

Working with partners to deliver positive interventions

Tackling priorities identified by local people

Providing answers to the public on what has been done

Response is 3 strand approach

• Early Intervention/Prevention

• Legal enforcement

• Situational crime prevention/Target hardening

Restorative justiceGRIP/YIP/PAYP(early intervention) Outreach work (LYS)Princes TrustReparationTower Project (drug rehabilitation

project)Promote community centre useSchool involvementAcceptable Behaviour ContractsStreetwise SoccerResidents group – buddies

Response Social Crime prevention approach

Response 10 ASBOs12 drug warrants 2 ASB Injunctions 3 Closure OrdersIndividual Support OrdersParenting OrdersHigh profile arrests Prosecution of persistent

offenders 8 Notices of Seeking Possession1 Demotion of Tenancy3 EvictionsTarget offenders Target interventionsINTL visitsRat trap Patrol & hotspotsMobile Police Station

Response Situational crime prevention approaches

Target hardeningEstate clean up Improve lightingImprove fencingFunding for CCTVOption appraisal Crummock RdInfluence redesign of Crummock RdReduce No’s of play areas Improve existing play areas

Assessment

• What works:

Important to report back to communityUse of Media

Positive activities show sustainability

AssessmentQuantitative

All crime

Dwelling burglaries

Criminal damage

All reports

ASB reports

Void properties

63 15% 49% 11 20% 91% 41 20% 66%

242 15% 34% 53 20% 29% 35 50% 85%

Start TargetActual

% Reductions

AssessmentQuantitative

• Economic & Social Cost Savings – Savings first three months of 2007:

• £35,468.– Potential Annual Saving: £141,872

• Cost Saving - CGA– Savings first three months 2007:

• £49,803– Potential Annual Saving: £199,212

AssessmentQuantitative

• Disrupt drug dealing • Dissolve FPOG

• Crummock RoadGatesOption appraisalFire Brigade

Assessment

• Remove fear of crime

Random samplingCommunity ActivitiesCommunity priority

CCTV

Assessment Qualitative

• Promote sustainable changeCommunity Centre

Street Wise SoccerSure StartOne Voice NM

• Community involvement

RaftCGA Community Development Officer

Princes TrustPACT