private equity financings
DESCRIPTION
Private Equity Financings. Downside Protection: What’s Important, What’s Not & Why. Down-Side Protection. Liquidation Preference Right of Redemption Price-based Anti-Dilution Protection. Liquidation Preference. The “New” Standard: participating Issues: - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Private Equity FinancingsPrivate Equity Financings
Downside Protection:
What’s Important,
What’s Not
& Why
Down-Side ProtectionDown-Side Protection
Liquidation Preference
Right of Redemption
Price-based Anti-Dilution Protection
Liquidation PreferenceLiquidation Preference The “New” Standard: participating Issues:
Participating vs Non-ParticipatingDisincentivize management team, if LP too
large Negotiation Ideas:
Repay Preferred, then pay common, THEN share upside
– Balances investor protection with management incentive
Liquidation PreferenceLiquidation PreferenceNegotiation Ideas cont’dBalance downside protection with
upside benefit–Different LP for M&A vs
Liquidation–LP subordinated to retention
bonuses – Fixed return for investors for greater
downside protection
Liquidation PreferenceLiquidation Preference The New Standard: Priority Issue: Priority vs Pari Passu Non-Issue:
– Generally, an investor issue -- potential conflict between classes, but money controls
– Cal. Corp. Code (§903(b) - Some class protection
– Some protection through board/observer rights
RedemptionRedemptionThe New Standard: More common, but not
“standard”Issues:
– Jeopardize company if insufficient $$ to repay– Gives investors inordinate bargaining power– Makes company less attractive acquisition
candidate
RedemptionRedemption
– Old CW: Non-issue Push off for 5 years, which was a long
timeWithin 5 years, company will either
exit or foldCorporations code protection, if
company cannot not afford redemption
RedemptionRedemption
– New CW: Issue? Longer liquidity path - 5 years is
“shorter” Corporations code protection, but Obligation still affects company’s
attractiveness for merger
RedemptionRedemption Negotiating Points
– Disincentive to Management – fully vest and then diminish value of shares
– Essentially converts equity into debt – so use it to bargain on valuation
– Push off as far into future as possible, and redeem over time
– Might deter future investors – whose proceeds are used to pay redemption
– Permit Company to delay redemption for cause– Require “call”, if must have redemption
Anti-Dilution ProtectionAnti-Dilution Protection The “New” Standard: Weighted Average Issues:
– Broad vs Narrow-based– Full Rachet
Negotiation Points– Push hard against full rachet
Disincentive to additional investorsSee example
– Recommend limited rachet – tied to reduction of risk (e.g., hitting milestones)
Founder Vesting & Founder Vesting & AccelerationAcceleration
Issues:– if Founder can’t get liquid, valuation is
secondary Negotiate V&A in context of valuation
– Removal by Board for “convenience” Acceleration on termination “without cause” Include Constructive Termination Double Trigger
TERM SHEETS 101TERM SHEETS 101
Thursday, march 15, 2001
8:30am- 12:00pm
Software Development Forum