primary review
DESCRIPTION
PRIMARY REVIEW. AMALGAMATION OF INFANT/JUNIOR SCHOOLS Consultation Spring Term 2006. BACKGROUND. Primary Review – Executive Board 5/9/05 recognised the need to review and subsequently rationalise current education provision . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PRIMARY REVIEW
AMALGAMATION OF
INFANT/JUNIOR SCHOOLS
Consultation Spring Term 2006
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
BACKGROUND
• Primary Review – Executive Board 5/9/05 recognised the need to review and subsequently rationalise current education provision .
• Members supported the continued amalgamation of infant and junior schools
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
BACKGROUND (2)
• Executive Board approval 8/11/05 to the commencement of consultation with regard to:
- Gwenfro Infant and Junior schools
- Hafod y Wern Infant and Junior schools
• Timetable for consultation agreed
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
THE PROPOSAL
• To amalgamate the separate Infant and Junior schools with the aim of creating all through primary schools each to be led by a single headteacher and governing body
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES
• single school, single governing body, single management, single budget, increased teacher expertise;
• provide seamless learning continuum for pupils;
• provide improved and enhanced pastoral arrangements;
• create opportunities for greater flexibility in the use of the site;
• provide opportunity for additional services and additional investment;
• increase range of additional activities and extra-curricular for pupils – sports, music, team games;
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES (2)
• develop community focused school;
• give stronger base for utilising staff expertise;
• extend budgetary and organisational flexibility;
• extend pastoral arrangements and support for pupils with special and additional needs;
• opportunities for pupils to work together across key stages;
• single approach to learning 3-11;
• provide greater capacity for effective use of data and information
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
POTENTIAL DISADVANTAGES
• loss of tradition and the consequent fear associated with change;
• belief that the present schools are the best possible – environment, ethos, focus;
• established relationships between parents and staff, particularly the Headteacher;
• site specific issues;
• difficulty in understanding the needs of the ‘Future’.
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
Timescale (1)
• Consultation process
• Publication of statutory notice
• 2 month ‘window’ for any objections
• 4 month ‘window’ for Minister’s decision
• If approved, amalgamation effective from September 2007
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
GOVERNANCE
• Current governing bodies
• Temporary governing bodies
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
APPOINTMENTS
• Headteachers and Deputy Headteachers
• Teachers
• Support staff
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
Some factors to consider (1)
• Would an amalgamation provide opportunities to increase the range of expertise and experience of teaching staff and provide opportunities for improvements in the deployment and development of teachers?
• Would an amalgamation provide opportunities for development of the curriculum and in extra curricular and additional learning experiences?
• Would an amalgamation enable better continuity and progression of children’s work, particularly between Key Stage 1 (5-7) and Key Stage 2 (7-11)?
• Would an amalgamation allow better use of educational resources including teaching and non-teaching staff, and buildings and facilities?
Implementing eGovernment : Improving Service Delivery to the Public
Some factors to consider (2)
• Would an amalgamation allow improvement and greater flexibility in management and organisation?
• Would an amalgamation safeguard the needs of all pupils?
• What are the likely effects on the local community?
• What are the site implications?
• Would an amalgamation provide an opportunity to improve resource management and cost effectiveness?
• Would an amalgamation provide access to additional investment and services?