presentation sun forum las vegas 12 oct 2006
TRANSCRIPT
JEROEN MEIJER, SENIOR IT PROJECT MANAGER, KPNALIGN STORAGE SLAS TO BUSINESS NEEDS AND REDUCE STORAGE COSTOctober 12, 2006
sun.com/events/forum2006
KPN• Telephone, Internet, and Television in the
Netherlands• Mobile communication in the Netherlands,
Belgium (BASE), and Germany (E-Plus)• In 2005, all IT departments of the fixed
telephony division were merged into one IT department: IT Operations
• KPN currently is replacing its network by an all IP network, enabling triple play: VoIP, digital television, and Internet
Key Figures (2005):• Operating revenues: $ 14,92 m• Operating result: $ 2,935 m• After-tax profit: $ 1,847 m
Key Numbers (at Year-end 2005):• Number of fixed connections: 6.9 million,
of which 1.7 million ADSL• Mobile customers: 20.8 million
sun.com/events/forum2006
KPN Mobile Division 20.8 Million Subscribers
Netherlands
Market Share 46.3% Subscribers 8.1 m
Belgium
Market Share 13% Subscribers 2 m
Germany
Market Share 13.5% Subscribers 10.7 m
sun.com/events/forum2006
Jeroen Meijer• Jeroen Meijer is a senior project manager
at KPN • In 2005, Jeroen was program manager for the
IT Infrastructure Consolidation Program (ITIC)• One of the initiatives of ITIC program was
storage consolidation (other initiatives included server—and database consolidation) and as a part of that initiative the Storage SLA adjustment project was executed
• The SLA Adjustment project was staffed by SUN personnel (6 man)
sun.com/events/forum2006
Agenda• Background• Timelines• Project Approach• Project Results/Lessons Learned• Next Steps• Questions
sun.com/events/forum2006
Server Estate Situation 2004: The computing devices in the Netherlands are mainly hosted in 4 large, and several “smaller”, data centers
1093
595
397284
32835
8282
BUSSUM
Major Hosting Data CenterSupplier Location
32835
KPN Location
Server EstateAn in 2004 IT assessment (external study) from the asset inventory list provided by Supplier brought to light:• About 4000 servers
• 1800+ in the Wintel environment, • 1700+ in the Unix environment, • 400+ other Operating Systems
• Hosted at 36 different locations• “Island” solutions• Fast growingKPN IT Topology in the
Netherlands 2004
sun.com/events/forum2006
Storage Estate
• More than 10 different Storage Vendors • Storage Infrastructure
• Number of storage devices >135 • LEGACY—High costs associated• 48% of the storage environment is greater than 3 years old
• Storage Configuration• No tiered Infrastructure/Information lifecycle management
• The raw storage has been estimated to approximately 250TB; Growth > 100%
• 70% of the environment is managed by sourcer• No Capacity Management information• Others
• Storage purchased in per application not part of a strategic plan
IT Infrastructure
An analysis of the storage area networks reveals that many different SAN and backup environments have been deployed creating a non-standardized and complex environment to manage
sun.com/events/forum2006
Communication KPN—SupplierBOARD
Eelco Blok EBM+31 70 45 [email protected]
CorporateCenter
MobileDivisionMobile
FixedEelco Blok
KPNServices
Jos SwartsOther
Activities
Corporate Center
DPOFixedGudoNollen
Professional
FinanceServices
JanWesselin
gh+31 651263422
j.n.wesselingh@kpn
.com
Control &SupportLou vanHurck
Control &SupportHermanKoelfatDPO
MobileKlaus
Hörschgen
CC:RVBSecretaryno name1
CC:Treasury &Risk
management
no name2
CC:Corporate
Controlno name3
CC:Investor
Relationsno name4
CC:Fiscalaffairs
no name5
CC:Divestments,
Merger &Acquisitio
nsno name6
CC:CIOPieterBuijs
ProgramManagerCorporate
DataEric
Kramer
ArchitectConsultan
tFrans van
Vugt
ProgramManagerapplicatio
nRationalis
ationPeter
HermansProgramManagerProfesioli
singDemand
Organisation
Vincentvan
Ravels
CC:Corporate
Procurement
Willemvan
Oppen
ITCluster/
ManagedITC
ServicesEmilioPiers
ITCluster/Managed
ITCServicesFrirjof
BerenbakIT
Cluster/Managed
ITCServices
FritsHuijbrecht
sIT
Cluster/Managed
ITCServices
RoaldMinneboo
ITCluster/Managed
ITCServices
TeunFokkema
SpecialProjectsHarmMeijer
ITHardware
andSoftwareHenrietteSmuldersProcurem
ent
FacilityManagem
entMargaBlom
FixedEelco Blok
FixedJacobGroote
+31 50 5518 800
OporationTeam Fixed
DivisionBusinessSolution
Fixed:Segment Business
Fred deGoede
DivisionFixed
NetServices
Fixed:Segment Consumer
MichielBuitelaar
SegmentWholesale
&Operations
OperationsFixed Net
(OVN)Cees Bosman
CarrierServices
JoostFarwerck
KPN ServicesJos Swarts
ServicesHans Toet+31 6 5158
3501j.j.h.toet@kp
n.com
ServicesArjen de
Waal+31 6 5394
ServicesNico Witte+31 6 5334
2246n.witte@kpn
.com
CIO Oporation Team Fixed
CIO TeamDerk Poot
+31 6 2224 [email protected]
m
CIO TeamHenriette Smulders
+31 653222591h.a.q.m.smulders
@kpn.com
Operation TeamStaff
CIO TeamOdette Schuin
+31 50 5518877
CIO TeamRonald Janmaat
+31 6 51425295
CIO TeamPeter van der Knaap
+31 651367685p.a.j.vanderknaap@kp
n.com
CIO TeamRob Peters
+31 653211276r.m.peters@kpn
.com
STRATEGYJan Wildeboer
EnterComBas Burger
Fixed:Busines:EntercomMaarten
Schonfeld+31
703435003m.c.schonfeld
Bidmanagement
Hans Vogel
BusinessMarketingno name19
Connectivityno name20
Integrated &ManagedSolutions
no name22
Fixed:SegmentConsumer
Michiel Buitelaar
FixedTelephony
(VT)Karin Valk
+31703430686
BillingArnoud
Pleij
ProductHouse
Sep Visser
Development
BartOvertoom
Fixed:Consumer:VTBernard
Pekelharing+31 6 2280
ntNico
Admiraal+31 6 5339
Fixed:Consumer:VT:P
HJan
Garnier+31 70 44
63070j.a;[email protected]
Fixed:Consumer:VT:PH
Thorwald vanOverveld
+31 6 22 481304
Fixed:ConsumerSales
no name10
Fixed:Consumer
Marketingno name11
Fixed:KPN.com
no name12
Fixed:XS4ALL
no name13
Fixed:Broadband
no name8
Fixed:Planet MediaGroup
no name9
Carrier ServicesJoost Farwerck
WholesaleVoice
ServicesNational
no name14
WholesaleVoice
ServicesInternationalno name15
Local LoopServices
no name16
KPNwholesale
no name17
OperationsFixed Net
(OVN)Cees
Bosman
Service UnitServic
eAne
Mulder
Service UnitTechnicalBuildings
Ingeborg
Reitsma
Operators
Operator
Carrier
Services
Adriaan deHaasOpera
torTransmission
Services
HanWijns
Operator
Acces
Services
Herman
Waijers
Operator
VoiceServic
esPaul
Hendriks
Internet
Operator &Plane
tTechnologi
esTomPoelhekken
FixedNet
ArchitecturePaulin
eWens
ing
Serveice
UnitIT
Hanneke
Hoogweg
Developme
ntAndreRutte
n+3130658830
ApplicationSupport:AS
S&OBerryAlbersen
HRMEvertMarte
ns
ApplicationSupport:
LEV/S&I
Henkvan
Beek
ApplicationSupport:
VM&PC
LouisVermeulen
ApplicationSupport:CM
Marijke v.d.WielBusin
essContr
olNico
Groenen
Service
Manageme
ntRobvan
Asperen
r.v.a.vanasperen
@kpn.com
ApplicationSupport: M& CCSach
aHeuts
-Zwartkruis
HRM,Intern
alCommunicationRob
Janse
FinancialsWout
erJanss
en
Business ManagementBusiness ManagementFixed IFixed I
Bert Bijvank XFA Manager
Hans JansenHuman
Resource Manager
Enno ter KeurstCustomer
Solution Architect
Jankees BlokDirecteur
Marc Bosveld - Michaël DennebosLydia Litteel - Klaas de Lange
Richard Leupen - Henny van RijnRoelof Kiers - Linda MaasbommelMarten Molenbuur- Marvin Mac
Nack ^)Bea Siemerink
Customer Operations Managers
Sieger VolkersClient Operations Director
Business Business ManagementManagement
MobileMobile
Gerard van Alst ^)
Jos TheunissenHenk Kroon a.i.
Customer Operations Managers
Nico KruitClient Operations
Director
Business Business ManagementManagementCorporate / Corporate /
ServicesServicesLute Klein
Corry van der Schoor
Bart te WinkelJaap van der
ZwanCustomer Operations Managers
Johan DuimClient Operations
Director
Henk WildeboerCU Controller
PU-EIS
11 3 4
^) kort termijn inhuurn teamformatie
Customer Unit KPNCustomer Unit KPN06 July 200406 July 2004
Cees WestersContinuous
Improvement Manager
MO
Ron QuintProgram Manager
Annemarie Eleveld
Secretary
Egbert van de Pas
Program Manager
Inez van den Burg
Secretary
Supplier account organisation is organised to fend of KPN’s need of communication
sun.com/events/forum2006
Agenda• Background• Timelines• Project Approach• Project Results/Lessons Learned• Next Steps• Questions
sun.com/events/forum2006
``
ILM Evaluation Project 1Mini AssessmentDuration: 4 weeks
SUN SLA Adjustment Project Full Assessment
Duration: 13 weeksSUN
Value Proposition
SUN and EMCPositioning ILM
strategy
CIO Board
Timelines
July 2004
January 2005
March 2005
September 2005
Go / NoGo
ILM Evaluation Project 2Mini AssessmentDuration: 4 weeks
EMC
Program 1: Server Consolidation
Program 2: Storage Consolidation
Program 3: Database Consolidation
Milestone 1: CIO Support for ILM
Milestone 2: Vendor Selection
sun.com/events/forum2006
Storage Focus Areas
• Opportunities are classified according to benefits and effort for realization
1. Storage allocation for application in development2. Storage tier for application in development3. KPN Capacity Planning Functions4. IT Reporting Functions5. Storage allocation for NIM6. Demand Management Functions7. Contract Management Functions8. DR Strategies for business/applications9. DR Testing Schedules10. DR Organisation within IT11. Connectivity and logistics for DR12. Archiving Plans13. Archiving/Duplication on MCCS Peripheral Applications14. Archiving on OFT15. Archiving purge in MCCS 16. Archiving in Geoversum17. Top 10 applications analysis18. OFT downgrade and reduce duplicates19. PIO downgrade20. Cubes/datamart inputs on lower tier or archive storage 21. SCAN downgrade22. Backup reduction on SCAN23. OFT quality environments reduction24. OFT Document management architecture25. TRACE data migration26. Storage SLA adjustment
Capacity PlanningDemand Management
Contract Management
Disaster Recovery
The opportunities identified in this analysis have been categorized and grouped into initiatives topics
ArchivingData classification
Downgrade
Backup
MiscellaneousService Level
High
Low
Medium
Difficult Easy
Impo
rtan
ce o
f ben
efits
Effort for benefits realization
1
2
34
5
67
8
91011
12
1314
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Focus Areas
sun.com/events/forum2006
Go/NoGo Criteria• Pragmatic project proposal• Self financing approach• Ability to succeed• Cultural match (Dutch speaking experts)• Independency from IT Supplier• Experience
sun.com/events/forum2006
Agenda• Background• Timelines• Project approach• Project results/lessons learned• Next steps• Questions
sun.com/events/forum2006
Project Assignment
What KPN
Needs
What KPN
Wants
What KPNGets
Step 2. Capacity check:Does KPN get more than it
needs or wants?
Step 1. Consistency check:Are the current service levels in
line with KPN’s real needs?
Step 3. Health check:Does KPN want more/less
than it needs or gets?
Step 4. Continuity check:How does KPN prevent
inefficiencies from occuring in the future?
2
1
3
4
sun.com/events/forum2006
Approach—SRO-Concept• The SRO-concept shows three focus areas of the storage control process:
• In this project SUN focused mainly on the Standardization of SLAs taking into account the main objective; “to come with concrete recommendations that lead to savings that can be realized on a short-term basis”
Standardization of SLA• Identification of Quick- Wins on short term basis,
focus is on:• Tariff Alignment• Right Tiering within the SLA• Reduction of Backup-cycles and/or retention period
Rationalization of SLAs• Identification of improvements and/or savings for
individual or multiple SLAs on a mid-term basis with focus on:
• Right Tiering (use of data classification tools)• Right back-up cycle for right environment• Storage SLA management
Optimalization • Identification of to get optimal control about the used storage and costs for the long-term period with focus on:
• Introduce True Storage Utility• Introduce Service Resource Management• Make use of full automated ILM
Time (months)
Leve
l of
con
trol
Low
High
2420160 4 8 12
Standardization
Rationalization
Optimalization
Focus SLA-adjustment project
1
2
3
sun.com/events/forum2006
Approach—Project StepsThe following high-level process is defined for the project (Focus is on Standardization):
Week 1–4Step 0:Mobilization
Step 1: Creation of Framework +Questionnaire Form
Step 3a:
In depth analysis + Recommendations per batch
Focus on the ‘Standardization’ phase of SRO-concept
Step 4: End Report
High Potentials – SLAs
Step 3b: Validation of the findings and recommendations
By:
• Interviews
• Analysis
Batch Report ‘Recommendations for savings based upon:’
• Tariff alignment• Back-up• Right Tiering
Realizing cost savings by lineorg.
Week 5–8 Week 9–12 Week 13–16
Step 2: Filtering SLAs per batchInput:• SLA - documents• KPN project information• Returned Questionnaires
sun.com/events/forum2006
Agenda• Background• Timelines• Project Approach• Project Results/Lessons Learned• Next Steps• Questions
sun.com/events/forum2006
Results: SLA Classification• 11 SLAs identified with medium to high savings potential• 5 SLAs identified as SLAs with savings potential but limited storage information• 12 SLAs identified with little savings potential but not enough information• 38 SLAs identified with no savings potential and very little storage information
Infrastructure/Storage Detail information present in SLAHigh
Hoo
g
Low
Pote
ntia
l for
sav
ings
Low
Hig
h
13b
9
5
6 73a 3c
2
4
8
1814
13
16
10 12
17 1511
22
232930
2524 26
27 19
2120
2835 33
36
37
3139 34
38
41
32
52 5153 58 56
54
64
5960
62
55
5761
634543
484749
444642
50
16 SLAs in scope for more detailed analysis
sun.com/events/forum2006
Savings: 7.750,-
TimeSavings: 12.000,-
Savings: 5.500,-
First ClassCap:1000 GB
Price: € 5,00 GB/Month
Backup Cap: 7000GB
Annual Cost:
FC Storage: € 60.000,-
Backup: € 21000
Tariff AlignmentFirst Class
Storage according to
pricelist: €5,00
Current Situation
SLA Based on First Class
Storage
Cap:1000 GBFirst Class
Price: E 4,00
GB/Month
Annual Cost:48.000,-
True UtilityCapacity is over
dimensioned3 months batch production 1000
GB
Other 9 months regular 750 GB
Overall capacity per month : 875
GB
ILM & SRM
Based on ILM-data classification:
75% Active, 25 % Inactive Data
Move 25 % to Archive Tier
Cap:875 GBBusiness
Class
Price: E 3,00 GB/Month
Annual Cost:31.500,-
Price: E 3,00 GB/Month
Annual Cost:23.750,-
Savings: 29.500,-
Standardisation Rationalisation Optimalisation
Savi
ngs
Stor
age
Cap
acity
(GB
)
Back-Up
Adjust Back-up Scheme and
Ratio.
Old backup Cap:7000 GB
New backup Cap:6000 /4000 GB
E 0,25 GB/mnth
Annual Cost:18.000-
Savings: 24.000,-
Savings: 3.000,-
Savings: 27.000,-
Example: SLA – potential savings
Saving
opportunities
Right Tiering
No First Class but Business Class Storage is according to requirements
sufficient.
Cap:1000 GBBusiness
Class
Price: E 3,00 GB/Month
Annual Cost:36.000,-
Savings: 12.000,-
Savings: 12.000,-
EXAMPLE
sun.com/events/forum2006
Results: Storage Information in SLAs Storage components are not always specified in the SLA• Appr. 30% of the SLAs in scope contain information regarding storage costs
• Only 12 SLAs contained detailed storage information ( e.g., capacity and prices)• Appr. 30% of the SLAs in scope contains information about Back-up costs
• Only 12 SLAs had detailed back-up information
43 SLAs no detailed storage information
12 SLAs
With detailed storage capacity & cost information
21 SLAs
With storage capacity and cost information
Total: 64 SLAs
43 SLAs no detailed back-up information
12 SLAs
With detailed back-up capacity & cost information
21 SLAs
With back-up capacity and cost information
Total: 64 SLAs
Storage capacity and financial information in SLAs Back-up capacity and financial information in SLAs
sun.com/events/forum2006
Lessons Learned• Project findings:
• Storage information or KPIs in SLAs proved to be limited• Storage reporting is not adequate for managing the SLA• Backup schedules are not matched with requirements
• Project approach• Self-financing approach helps to get top level commitment • IT supplier is not the logical party to execute this type of projects
• Project execution• Storage management is rationalized: from 53 (!) different service levels
down to 6• SUN project team took a pragmatic and result-oriented way of working,
resulting in a smooth project with substantial financial benefits
sun.com/events/forum2006
Agenda• Background• Timelines• Project Approach• Project Results/Lessons Learned• Next Steps• Questions
sun.com/events/forum2006
Next Steps To become more in control over the storage environment and related storage costs, the following steps were recommended by SUN:
Apr 2006
Phase 1Storage SLA-adjustment Project
Is KPN in Control ?
May 2005 Aug 2005 Okt 2005 Jan 2006
Phase 2 Define Storage Performance
Indicators
How to get in control ? Phase 3
Supplier SLA validation Data classification
How to stay in control ?
Phase 4ILM Realization Project.
Storage Optimalization andRationalization
Phase 5Train a dedicated
Storage SLA expert Team
Time T+nT= 0
Leve
l of
sto
rage
con
trol
Low
High
Standardization
Rationalization
Optimalization
Current project
3
2
2
3
5
4
5
14
1
sun.com/events/forum2006
Commercial
Functional
Content
1a Framework of the ‘SLA House’
1b Collect all SLA Material
2 Build the ‘HTS SLA House’
CommercialsValue Proposition
3 Accept & Launch
Phased approach
HTS SLA
Consistent Horizontal Tiered Storage Model
HTS SLA Toolkit
Reporting
Price Scheme + Prices
Migration and ChangesTiering Service Description
High-Level Tiering
Framework Contract
HTS.SLA(Mantel Service Level Agreement.doc)
Selectielijst SLA’s(welke SLA’s als 1ste migreren,Beschikbaar na 25 nov)
Migratie & Change process(Addendum E.doc)
Tier 1Mission Critical
Tier 2Business Critical
Tier 3Productivity Important
Tier 4Tape
Tier 5Compliancy Archive
Prijslijst(beschikbaar 25nov)Highlevel tiering overview (ILM Tiers of Storage1_5.ppt)
Calculatieschema(Addendum C & Calculatiemodel gewogen rollend gemiddelde v0.6.xls)
= Supplier document
= KPN document
Rapportage(Addendum D.doc)
How to Get in Control: A Consistent Horizontal Tiered Storage Model and an SLA Toolkit
sun.com/events/forum2006
How to Stay in Control: Capacity Management
Strategyand
PlanningContract
ManagersPurchasingManagers
IT-OPSManagement
BusinessOwners
CapacityManager
ProjectManagers
AtosProject
Management
AtosServiceDelivery
AtosSales & Bid
Management
AtosArchitectureManagement
sun.com/events/forum2006
Conclusion1. Results of Storage SLA adjustment:
• SLAs are standardized; Tiered storage is implemented• Storage is perceived and managed as a cost driver• Storage is aligned to meet the business needs
2. Horizontal Tiered Storage SLA is set up3. Capacity management is implemented4. KPN is now prepared to continue this road and
start implementing ILM
sun.com/events/forum2006
Agenda• Background• Timelines• Project Approach• Project Results/Lessons Learned• Next Steps• Questions