presentation for dental specialists
DESCRIPTION
Treating Our Patients Using Endodontic and Implant RestorationsTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Treating Our Patients Using Endodontic and Implant Restorations
PPAC
![Page 2: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Treatment Numbers Endodontic and implant restorations are
performed daily by dentists and specialists For endodontic treatment, estimates for the year
2000 were 30 million endodontic procedures annually (ADA)
Estimated number of patients receiving endosseous implants 1996 - 300,000-428,000 annually, 2000 - 910,000 annually future annual growth rate - 18.6%
(Millenium Research Group)
![Page 3: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Treatment Numbers
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
Implant placement at University of Minnesota 1997-2007
Implants
Patients
40% increase annually
1997-2007
![Page 4: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Treatment Considerations “Treatment planning for
the future: Endodontics, fixed partial dentures – or implants?”
![Page 5: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Treatment Considerations “The success rate of
non-surgical root canal treatment is unclear within the endodontic literature.”
“…(endodontics) in general practice, the success rate can be 64% to 75%.”
“Endodontic therapy may extend the life of the tooth but very little is known on the extent of tooth longevity.”
![Page 6: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics The Academy of Osseointegration’s 2006
workshop on the state of the science of implant dentistry entrusted Iqbal and Kim to systematically “review clinical studies of the survival of single-tooth implants and endodontically treated and restored teeth and to compare the results.”
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 7: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Furthermore, in response to an ADA
Foundation request for proposals Torabinejad, et al, conducted a systematic review of the clinical, psychosocial, and economic outcomes of endodontics, implants and FPDs.
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 8: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 9: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Apples vs. Oranges Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 10: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 11: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Success CriteriaEndodontic Criteria 1956, Strindberg proposes stringent
radiographic criteria Strindberg LZ, 1956
![Page 12: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Success CriteriaEndodontic Criteria 1956, Strindberg proposes radiographic
criteria Beginning in 1966 and since, many authors
suggest radiographic criteria is ill advised Bender IB, Seltzer S and Soltanoff W, 1966 Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, et al, 1994 Fristad I, et al, 2004 Gutmann JL, 1992 Seltzer S, 1988
![Page 13: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Success CriteriaEndodontic Criteria 1956, Strindberg proposes radiographic
criteria Beginning in 1966 and since, many authors
suggest radiographic criteria is ill advised However, some studies still use Strindberg’s
dated criteria. Allen R, Newton C and Brown C, 1991 Sundqvist G, et al, 1998 Sjogren U, et al, 1990 Farzaneh M, Abitbol S and Friedman S, 2004
![Page 14: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Success CriteriaEndodontic Criteria 1956, Strindberg proposes radiographic
criteria Beginning in 1966 and since, many authors
suggest radiographic criteria is ill advised However, some studies still use Strindberg’s
dated criteria. Fristad and colleagues showed the potential
for late radiographic healing. Fristad, Molven and Halse, 2004
![Page 15: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Success Criteria
![Page 16: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Success Criteria
![Page 17: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Endodontic Success Criteria
3-year recall
![Page 18: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Endodontic Success Criteria
![Page 19: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Endodontic Success Criteria
![Page 20: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Endodontic Success Criteria
12-month recall
![Page 21: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Success Criteria 1956, Strindberg proposes radiographic
criteria Beginning in 1966 and since, many authors
suggest radiographic criteria is ill advised However, some studies still use Strindberg’s
dated criteria. Fristad and colleagues showed the potential
for late radiographic healing. Success or Survival?
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 22: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Success Criteria Success or Survival? The definition of “success” for dental implant
studies is often implant survival Unlike implants and FPDs, RCTs aim to cure
existing disease Weiger, et al, 1998
![Page 23: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Success Criteria Success or Survival? Unlike implants and FPDs, RCTs aim to cure
existing disease Thus, RCT studies measure both the healing
of existing disease and the occurrence of new disease.
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 24: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Success Criteria Success or Survival? It has been suggested that implant success
criteria are not routinely applied in much of the implant outcomes literature
Salinas and Eckert, 2007
![Page 25: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Success Criteria Success or Survival? “In essence, the use of lenient success
criteria in implant studies may translate to higher success rates, while stringent criteria employed in root canal prognostic studies may lead to lower success rates.”
Watson, et al, 1999 Johnson, et al, 2000 Wennstrom, et al, 2005
![Page 26: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Success Criteria In order to establish comparable comparisons, it
is critical that the same outcome measure is used to assess both endodontic and implant procedures.
![Page 27: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Success Criteria In order to establish comparable comparisons, it is
critical that the same outcome measure is used to assess both endodontic and implant procedures
Due to these differences in meanings of success, it is probable survival rates “will permit less biased, albeit less informative, comparisons.”
Doyle, et al, 2006 Eckert and Wollan, 1998 Creugers, et al, 2000 Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 28: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Success Criteria The Academy of Osseointegration’s 2006
workshop on the state of the science of implant dentistry entrusted Iqbal and Kim to systematically “review clinical studies of the survival of single-tooth implants and endodontically treated and restored teeth and to compare the results.”
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 29: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Success Criteria Success or Survival?
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 30: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Success Criteria - Implants Two 3.75 x 18 implants
were placed on #9, 10 sites Implants appear
osseointegrated
![Page 31: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Initial visit pt presented with
provisional restorations
Success Criteria - Implants
Esthetics case referred to Dr. Debra Johnson
![Page 32: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 33: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Restorative Impact
Lazarski et al examined over 110,000 endodontic cases, and found teeth that were not restored were significantly more likely (>4 X) to undergo extraction.
Lazarski et al 2001
![Page 34: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Restorative Impact Lazarski et al examined over 110,000 endodontic
cases, and found teeth that were not restored were significantly more likely (>4 X) to undergo extraction.
The restoration of an endodontically treated tooth is considered a major determinant of its survival.
Vire DE, 1991 Siqueira JF, 2001 Hoen MM, Pink FE, 2002 Salehrabi R, Rotstein I, 2004 Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ, 2002 Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT, 1985
![Page 35: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Restorative Impact The Academy of Osseointegration’s 2006
workshop on the state of the science of implant dentistry entrusted Iqbal and Kim to systematically “review clinical studies of the survival of single-tooth implants and endodontically treated and restored teeth and to compare the results.”
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 36: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Restorative Impact
![Page 37: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Restorative Impact
![Page 38: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Restorative Impact
![Page 39: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Restorative Impact
22-month recall
![Page 40: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Restorative Impact The restoration of an endodontically treated
tooth is considered a major determinant of its survival.
More prosthetic complications with implants. Goodacre CJ, et al, 2003 Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007 Doyle et al 2006
![Page 41: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Bone Loss Around Implants With implant placement, 1 mm of bone is loss
during the first year of placement, with an additional 0.1mm annually.
Can vary with implant type/material
![Page 42: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Bone Loss Around Implants
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Year >
Bon
e Lo
ss (m
m)
n=455 Error bars = S.E.M.
![Page 43: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Cost to Patient Analysis of 2005 insurance data concluded
that restored single-tooth implants cost 75-90% more than similarly restored endodontic-treated teeth
![Page 44: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Cost to Patient Analysis of 2005 insurance data concluded
that restored single-tooth implants cost 75-90% more than similarly restored endodontic-treated teeth
Post-treatment problems can increase this cost difference
![Page 45: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Cost to Patient
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Endodontic/Restoration Implant/Restoration
Ave
rage
Pric
e ($
$) 130%Increase
![Page 46: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 47: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Who’s Treating?
Historically, implants placed by specialists, while many endodontic studies were conducted on patients treated by dental students.
Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ, 2002 Bergman B, et al, 1989 Dammaschke T, et al, 2003 Lynch CD, et al, 2004 Mentink AG, et al, 1993
![Page 48: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Who’s Treating?
Of 13,047 identified studies, 147 articles from the endo, prosth and implant literature were systematically reviewed.
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 49: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Who’s Treating? Of 13,047 identified studies, 147 articles from
the endo, prosth and implant literature were systematically reviewed.
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
GPs or Specialists StudentsImplant 0% 87%Prostho 29% 35%Endo 63% 29%
![Page 50: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Who’s Treating?
![Page 51: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Who’s Treating?
![Page 52: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Who’s Treating?
![Page 53: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Who’s Treating?
![Page 54: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 55: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Publication Bias
More likely to exist when a particular brand of implant is studied. While endodontics is mostly generic.
Schnitman PA, Shulman LB, 1979 Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007 Andersson B, et al, 1998 Brocard D, et al, 2000 Deporter DA, et al, 1998
![Page 56: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Publication Bias
More likely to exist when a particular brand of implant is studied. While endodontics is mostly generic.
Furthermore, 13% of the implant studies had an evaluator that was different than the operator, while 88% of the endo papers had independent evaluators.
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 57: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Publication Bias
More likely to exist when a particular brand of implant is studied. While endodontics is mostly generic.
Furthermore, 13% of the implant studies had an evaluator that was different than the operator, while 88% of the endo papers had independent evaluators
“… the authors' results confirm the presence of publication bias in implant dentistry literature…”
Moradi DR, et al, 2006
![Page 58: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Success criteria Problem areas Who’s treating Publication bias Modern advances
![Page 59: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Modern Advances
Both Iqbal and Kim’s as well as Torabinejad and colleagues’ systemic reviews were conducted “using material from previous decades and therefore reflect the treatment approaches prevalent at that time.”
Iqbal and Kim, 2007
![Page 60: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Modern Advances
Implants New implant shape/design New surface modifications New implant-abutment
interfaces Immediate loading Mini implants Etc…
![Page 61: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Modern Advances
Implants New implant
shape/design New surface
modifications New implant-abutment
interfaces Immediate loading Mini implants Etc…
Endodontics NiTi instrumentation Apex locators Surgical operating
microscope Digital radiography Materials: MTA,
MTAD, Resilon DNA hybridization,
PCR, etc… Etc…
![Page 62: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 63: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 64: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 65: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Case Selection – Fx #20
![Page 66: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 67: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Case Selection
1-month recall
![Page 68: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 69: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 70: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 71: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Case Selection
![Page 72: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Case Selection
13-month recall
![Page 73: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics The Academy of Osseointegration’s 2006 workshop
on the state of the science of implant dentistry entrusted Iqbal and Kim to systematically “review clinical studies of the survival of single-tooth implants and endodontically treated and restored teeth and to compare the results.”
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 74: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics
The Academy of Osseointegration’s 2006 workshop on the state of the science of implant dentistry entrusted Iqbal and Kim to systematically “review clinical studies of the survival of single-tooth implants and endodontically treated and restored teeth and to compare the results.”
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
AND
![Page 75: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics
The Academy of Osseointegration’s 2006 workshop on the state of the science of implant dentistry entrusted Iqbal and Kim to systematically “review clinical studies of the survival of single-tooth implants and endodontically treated and restored teeth and to compare the results.”
Furthermore, in response to an ADA Foundation request for proposals Torabinejad, et al, conducted a systematic review of the clinical, psychosocial, and economic outcomes of endodontics, implants and FPDs.
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 76: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics
“…in periodontally sound teeth having pulpal and/or periradicular pathosis, root canal therapy resulted in…equal outcomes (97%) to extraction and replacement of the missing tooth with an implant.”
Torabinejad, et al, 2007
![Page 77: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics
“No difference in the survival rates between the two treatment modalities.”
Iqbal MK, Kim S, 2007
![Page 78: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics
n=4477
Endo/Implant:Survival proportions
0 2 4 6 8 100.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
ImplantEndodontic
Time
Unpublished data from AAE Foundation - Bowles, Eleazer, Drum & Goodis 2008
![Page 79: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Endodontic therapy should be given priority in
treatment planning for periodontally sound single teeth with pulpal and or periradicular pathology.
![Page 80: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics Endodontic therapy should be given priority in
treatment planning for periodontally sound single teeth with pulpal and or periradicular pathology.
Implants should be given priority in treatment planning for teeth that are planned for extraction
![Page 81: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics The decision to treat a compromised tooth
endodontically or replace it with an implant must be based on factors other than treatment outcome – since the outcomes are similar.
Iqbal and Kim 2008
![Page 82: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Implants vs. Endodontics
CASE SELECTIONCASE SELECTIONCASE SELECTION
![Page 83: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Conclusion
Functional survival rates are high for both treatments
![Page 84: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Conclusion
Functional survival rates are high for both treatments
Endodontic treatment on a hopeless tooth is just as unethical as extracting a restorable tooth and replacing it with an implant
![Page 85: Presentation for Dental Specialists](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020422/568c0e6c1a28ab955a906c41/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Conclusion
Functional survival rates are high for both treatments
Endodontic treatment on a hopeless tooth is just as unethical as extracting a restorable tooth and replacing it with an implant
Since outcomes are similar with either treatment, decisions should be based on other factors such as restorability, costs, esthetics, potential adverse outcomes and ethical factors