preparation for wtsa 2016 - itu · study group 2 w or 10 d 8 (or 6) months w r…r s sg 1 w /5 d r...

International Telecommunication Union~ United Nations specialized agency for ICTs

Preparation

for

WTSA 2016

Contents

1. Vision and Objectives of WTSA-16

2. Study Group Structure

CIS/RCC, RPM for WTSA-16

12-14 April 2016

Contents

1. Vision and Objectives of WTSA-162. Study Group Structure


12-14 April 2016

Minimum Objective: Ready for 2020 Expected message from WTSA 2016 re-structuring:

• Standard development platform: ready for 2020 and beyond• ICT plays a crucial role in convergence, and so should ITU-T• Valuable place for industry production and market developments• Tactile awareness about the technology trend and market flows• Enhance “Relevance” of ITU-T activities and value to Membership:

Members, markets and businesses Balance of roles between developed and developing Clearer visibility on standards/technology targets Better coherence of Infrastructure

Vision of WTSA-16 (1/2)


12-14 April 2016

Vision of WTSA-16 (2/2)

• Raise level of WTSA-16 and make this the best ever WTSA

• Less inward-looking and procedure-focused

• Make it interesting to the world outside ITU

• Spice up plenary sessions with talks by renowned speakers

on 5G, IoT, smart cities, video is the future, over-the-top

services, digital financial services, optical fibre,

trust/security/privacy, big data, e-health, connected car …

• Your suggestions welcome for speakers


12-14 April 2016

ITU-T Strategic Objectives (1)

ITU-T objectives Outcomes

T.1 Develop non-discriminatory international standards (ITU-T Recommendations) in a timely manner and foster interoperability and improved performance of equipment, networks, services and applications

T.1-1: Increased utilization of ITU-T RecommendationsT.1-2: Improved conformance to ITU-T RecsT.1-3: Enhanced standards in new technologies andservices

T.2 Promote the active participation of the membership, in particular developing countries, in the definition and adoption of non-discriminatory international standards (ITU-T Recommendations) with a view to bridging the standardization gap

T.2-1: Increased participation in the ITU-T standardization process, including attendance at meetings, submission of contributions, taking leadership positions and hosting of meetings/ workshops, especially from developing countriesT.2-2: Increase in ITU-T membership, including Sector Members, Associates and Academia


12-14 April 2016

ITU-T Strategic Objectives (2)

ITU-T objectives Outcomes

T.3 Ensure effective allocation and management of international telecommunication numbering, naming, addressing and identification resources in accordance with ITU-T Recommendations and procedures

T.3-1: Timely and accurate allocation of international telecommunication numbering, naming, addressing and identification resources, as specified in the relevant recommendations

T.4 Foster the acquisition and sharing of knowledge and know-how in the standardization activities of ITU-T

T.4-1: Increased knowledge of ITU-T standards and best practices in the implementation of ITU-T standardsT.4-2: Increased participation in ITU-T's standardization activities and increased awareness of the relevance of ITU-T standards

T.5 Extend and facilitate cooperation with international, regional and national standardization bodies

T.5-1: Increased communication with other standards organizationsT.5-2: Decreased number of conflicting standardsT.5-3: Increased number of Memoranda of Understanding / collaboration agreements with other organizationsT.5-4: Increased number of ITU-T A.4, A.5 and A.6 qualified organizations


12-14 April 2016

WTSA 2016: support Strategic Objectives

Key essential outcomes from Strategic Objectives• T.1-1: Increased utilization of ITU-T Recommendations• T.1-2: Improved conformance to ITU-T Recommendations• T.4-1: Increased knowledge of ITU-T standards and best practices in the

implementation of ITU-T standards• T.4-2: Increased participation in ITU-T's standardization activities and

increased awareness of the relevance of ITU-T standards• T.1-3: Enhanced standards in new technologies and services• T.5-1: Increased communications with other standards organizations

T.5-2: Decreased number of conflicting standards• T.2-1: Increased participation in the ITU-T standardization process…

especially from developing countries• T.2-2: Increase in ITU-T membership, including Sector Members,

Associates and Academia• T.3-1: Timely and accurate allocation of international telecommunication

NNAI resources, as specified in the relevant recommendations

More implementable &tighten relationship among issues and Recs

Flexibility and dynamics according to awareness of technology & business trends

Clear visibility and key competences


12-14 April 2016

Contents

1. Vision and Objectives of WTSA-16

2. Study Group Structure


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Restructuring

• At TSAG in February:

• No formal proposal from membership

• TSB Director’s food for thought

• TSB Circular Letter 204, 8 March: hold off on submitting

applications for chairmen/VC until TSAG July when study

structure will have become clearer

• No longer running: chairmen of ITU-T SG5, 9, 11, 16, 17• Table with term limits of chairmen/vice-chairmen: here


12-14 April 2016

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/wtsa16/Documents/ITU-T_SGChairmen_VC_term_limit_20160302.doc

Study Group Structure: Functions and Elements

Equipped with functions and elements:• Service and applications (Telecom media-based and cable-based)• Key Functions: Transport (very big), Control (small), Management (very

small), QoS/QoE, Security and Environments/Energy• Essential elements: Use cases, Requirements, Architectures,

Mechanisms, Protocols, C&I, NNAI, and EPI (Economic and Policy Issues) • Except “End user devices”

Enough # of Members: MS + SM (269) + Associates (144) + Academia (110) Many tools: SG, FG, Workshop, Academia Events and Seminars

• Good at “references” and “information”• Relatively weak at contribution to market & industry• “So far ITU-T is mainly working on building blocks, not so much on solutions,

i.e. ITU-T Recommendations mainly address specific elements (protocols etc.), whilst implementations of products or even networks requires implementation of multiple Recommendations” – TD 419/TSAG, Feb 2016 -

• Good at “references” and “information”• Relatively weak at contribution to market & industry• “So far ITU-T is mainly working on building blocks, not so much on solutions,

i.e. ITU-T Recommendations mainly address specific elements (protocols etc.), whilst implementations of products or even networks requires implementation of multiple Recommendations” – TD 419/TSAG, Feb 2016 -


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Status of Relationships

Number(Id?)

Number(Id?)

EPIEPI

Control

Control

RequirementsFunctions

Architectures

RequirementsFunctions

Architectures

Transport (being expanded)Transport (being expanded)

Management

Management

EnvEngEnvEngQoS/QoEQoS/QoE

SecuritySecurity

CATVCATV

MMMM

IoT/SCIoT/SC

?

??

EPI: Economic and Policy Issues MM: Multi-MediaCATV: Cable TVId: IdentificationEnv: EnvironmentEng: Energy


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Expected Model

Infrastructure FunctionsInfrastructure Functions

Common Use Functions (Qos, Security etc)Common Use Functions (Qos, Security etc)

Serv/App oriented

Functions

Serv/App oriented

Functions

Serv/App oriented

Functions

Serv/App oriented

Functions

Serv/App oriented

Functions

Serv/App oriented

Functions

Op

era

tio

nal

, EP

IFu

nct

ion

sO

pe

rati

on

al, E

PI

Fun

ctio

ns


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: recurring issues since WTSA-08

Unsuccessful past merger proposals:• SG2 + SG3• SG11 + SG13• SG9 + SG16

No agreement up to WTSA-12 Collocated meeting (not always possible):

• SG2 and SG3 • SG11 and SG13• SG9 and SG16

None of groups in favor to merge

Good to reduce # of SGs?But what’s the value?- Impact on fulfilling

Strategic Objectives- Ready for 2020- Enhance visibility and

relevance


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Classifying SGs

Possibly four categories of SG: Operational (Policy/Regulation), Commonly used functions, Service/Application oriented, and Infrastructure

SG 2SG 2

SG 3SG 3

Operational

SG 5SG 5

SG 12SG 12

SG 17SG 17

Common UsedFunctions

SG 9SG 9

SG 16SG 16

SG 20SG 20

ServiceApplication

Oriented

SG 11SG 11

SG 13SG 13

SG 15SG 15

Infrastructure

MM

M: Management


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Mapping to the Model

Infrastructure Functions(SG 11, SG13, SG15, WP2/2)*

Infrastructure Functions(SG 11, SG13, SG15, WP2/2)*

Common Functions (SG5, SG12, SG17)Common Functions (SG5, SG12, SG17)

Ser/App Functions (SG9)




Ser/AppFunctions (SG20)

Ser/AppFunctions (SG20)

Op

era

tio

nal

Fun

ctio

ns

(SG

2, S

G3

)

Op

era

tio

nal

Fun

ctio

ns

(SG

2, S

G3

)


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Strengthen Infrastructure

Control Transport

Management

Man

agem

ent

Overall Use casesOverall Use cases

RequirementsRequirements

Func/ArchitecturesFunc/Architectures

MechanismsMechanisms

SolutionsSolutions

SG11 + SG13 + SG15 + WP2/2 SG X(Access Infrastructure)

SG Y(Core Infrastructure)

Further issues: C&I, Counterfeit, Outside Plant, Home Networks


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Possible way forward

Env/EngEnv/EngQoS/QoEQoS/QoE SecuritySecurity

CATVCATV MMMM IoT/SCIoT/SC

Number(Id?)

Number(Id?)

EPIEPI

Further detailed arrangements among SGs should follow


12-14 April 2016

Study Group Structure: Meeting duration and frequency

S W R…………R W SS W R…………R W S

Study Group

2 W or 10 D

S W R…………R W SS W R…………R W S

Study Group

2 W or 10 D

8 (or 6) months

W R…R SW R…R S

SG

1 W /5 DR RR R

3~5 D

R WR W

3~5 D

R SR S

3~5 D

R RR R

3~5 D

Enhance Production: Dynamic, Flexible, Efficient, and Effective

W R…R SW R…R S

SG

1 W /5 D

Could be 8 (or 6) months

S: Study Group PlenaryW: Working Party PlenaryR: Rapporteur Group session/meeting


12-14 April 2016

www.itu.int