preliminary structural and stratigraphic analysis of ... presentation_2005... · (2) to link rock...
TRANSCRIPT
Your title hereYour name here
Allied Geophysical Laboratories, University of Houston
Preliminary Structural and Stratigraphic Analysis of Miocene Aged Sands, Offshore Gulf of Mexico
Matthew Van Wie, Fred Hilterman, Charlotte Sullivan and Kurt MarfurtUniversity of Houston
Stratigraphy:
The stratigraphy of the High Island area comprises sediments deposited by the Calcasieu Delta and the shifting Mississippi depocenter from the Oligo-Miocene to the present. The sediments are dominated by shale with interbeddedsand deposited by fluvial and deltaic systems. The main reservoirs range in age from ~14.8 Ma (Cibicides opima) to ~19 Ma (Marginulina ascensionensis) (Figure 2) and comprise sediments deposited as delta fringe sediments, shelf blanket sands, channel/levee complexes, and distributary mouth bars. Typically these facies exhibit upward-coarsening (distributary mouth bars and delta fringe) and blocky to upward-fining (channel/levee complexes) log signatures.
Structural Setting:
The study area occurs within a structural province in the northern Gulf of Mexico called the Oligo-Miocene detachment province by Diegel et al. (1995) (Figure 1). The age of this province cited by Diegel et al. (1995) conflicts with the interpretation of Peel et al. (1995), who tentatively assign an Eocene-Oligocene age to the salt sheet decollement in this region. This province covers much of the modern shelf and parts of coastal and onshore Texas and Louisiana, and is characterized by evacuated allocthonous salt sheets and roho systems (Figure 1). The roller faults that characterize this structural province generally strike east-west, and dip basinward; roller faults are listric normal faults that sole into salt sheets or their equivalent welds
Thesis Research Objectives:
The main objective of my thesis will be to conduct a detailed seismic reservoir characterization of Miocene aged sands, High Island Area, Gulf of Mexico. The general objective contains several goals:
(1) To characterize hydrocarbon reservoirs from seismic data using the rock physics/petrophysics link between seismic and reservoir properties;
(2) To link rock physics/petrophysics and seismic attribute analysis to sedimentary facies and geologic properties to be able to describe lithofacies and depositional environments from seismic data;
(3) To improve the understanding of seismic signatures in Northern Gulf of Mexico clastic depositional environments.
MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH
References:
Diegel, F.A., Carlo, J.F., Schuster, D.C., Shoup, R.C., and Tauvers, P.R., 1995, Cenozoic structural evolution and tectono-stratigraphic framework of the northern gulf coast continental margin, in Jackson, M.P.A., Roberts, D.G., and Snelson, S., eds., Salt Tectonics: a global perspective: AAPG Memoir 65, p. 109-151.
Peel, F.J., Travis, C.J., and Hossack, J.R., 1995, Genetic structural provinces and salt tectonics of the Cenozoic offshore U.S. Gulf of Mexico: a preliminary analysis, in Jackson, M.P.A., Roberts, D.G., and Snelson, S., eds., Salt Tectonics: a global perspective: AAPG Memoir 65, p. 109-151.
8300’ Sand
8500’ Sand
9100’ Sand
10.1 #
8300’ Sand
8500’ Sand
9100’ Sand
(Est) Robulus “L”
Robulus “L”
0 150GR
-100 -20SP
0.1 100ILD
7000
7 70 0
8 40 0
9 10 0
9 80 0
1 05 0
01 1
2 00
1 19 0
01 2
6 00
Sandstone
Pay
BigHum Paleo
8300’ Sand
8500’ Sand
9100’ Sand
CibOp Paleo
AmphB Paleo
G Sand
J1 Sand
11600’ Sand
RobM Paleo
Rob54 No. 3 Sand
Rob54 No. 7 Sand
11.1 #
12.1 #
12.1 #
“G” Sand
“J-1” Sand
11600’ Sand
Robulus 54 No.1 Sand
Robulus 54 No.2 Sand
Robulus 54 No.3 Sand
“G” Sand
“J-1” Sand
11600’ Sand
Robulus 54 No.1 Sand
Robulus 54 No.2 Sand
Robulus 54 No.3 Sand
Rob 54 No.3 Sand
“G” Sand
“J-1” Sand
11600’ Sand
30603040302030002980296029402920290028802860284028202800278027602740272027002680266026402620260025802560254025202500248024602440242024002380236023402320230022802260
2224
3099
9100’ Sand - Time Structure Map
A
A’
3320331033003290328032703260325032403230322032103200319031803170316031503140313031203110310030903080307030603050304030303020301030002990298029702960295029402930292029102900289028802870286028502840283028202810280027902780
2761
3333
11600’ Sand - Time Structure Map
A
A’
3180316031403120310030803060304030203000298029602940292029002880286028402820280027802760274027202700268026602640262026002580256025402520250024802460244024202400238023602340232023002280226022402220220021802160214021202100208020602055
3216
8300’ Sand (CibOb) - Time Structure Map
A
A’
A A’
8300’ Sand
9100’ Sand
11600’ Sand
NNW SSE
Figure 3: Seismic profile showing some of the major SE dipping faults in the study area. (Data courtesy of Fairfield Industries)
Figure 4: Type Log annotated with paleo picks and major sand horizons. (Data courtesy of A2D Technologies)
Figure 3
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 1: Northern Gulf of Mexico map illustrating Basinward dipping faults (blue), landward dipping faults (red), deepwater contrational foldbelts (green), and shallow salt (black) (from Diegel, 1995).
Figure 2: Biostratigraphic Chart for the Gulf of Mexico Basin (study area horizons highlighted in red)
Figure 4
Reservoir Characterization
SEISMIC
Seismic
Rock Physics /
Petrophysics
Geology