preliminary soil contamination assessment
TRANSCRIPT
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council 257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW 2620
Report prepared for – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council c/- D&N Geotechnical Pty Ltd
2 December 2019 BPE19094-R01
Suite 2, 192 Pacific Highway Coffs Harbour NSW 2450
(02) 6658 [email protected]
Quality information
Revision history
Revision Description Date Technical Review Approved
Original Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment
27 November 2019 Peter Moore CEnvP Site Contamination Specialist
Andrew Ballard CEnvP
Version 1 Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment
2 December 2019 Andrew Ballard CEnvP
Andrew Ballard CEnvP
Distribution
Report Status
No. of copies
Format Distributed to Date
Version 1 1 PDF Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
2 December 2019
Version 1 1 PDF D&N Geotechnical 2 December 2019
Version 1 1 PDF Ballpark Environmental 2 December 2019
2 December 2019
Our ref: BPE19094-R01
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council c/- D&N Geotechnical Pty Ltd PO Box 4359 HAWKER, ACT 2614
Sent via email: [email protected]
Attention: Michael Damo, Contracts Engineer Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
Dear Michael,
RE: Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd is pleased to present the preliminary Soil Contamination
Assessment report prepared following investigation of soil and groundwater condition
on the site of Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Councils proposed headquarters project
on part of Lot 2 DP1179998, the site. This report incorporates comments received from
Council on the original version of the report.
This preliminary SCA report has been prepared by Ballpark Environmental with support
provided by D&N Geotechnical Pty Ltd and includes a preliminary assessment of soil and
groundwater contamination on this site. As requested by Council the report also
includes an interim waste classification assessment for surplus in-situ soils at the
location of a proposed underground carpark in the south of the site.
I trust that this report meets with your requirements. If you require further information
or assistance, please do not hesitate to us on (02) 6658 0585.
For and on behalf of Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd
Andrew Ballard Principal Environmental Scientist Licensed Asbestos Assessor Certified Environmental Practitioner
Joel Parkin Associate Environmental Engineer Licensed Asbestos Assessor
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
ii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
2. Objective and Scope of Works ................................................................................................................. 4
3. Site Details ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.1. Geology, Hydrogeology & Hydrology ....................................................................................... 5
3.1.1. Subsurface Conditions ..................................................................................................... 5
3.1.2. Groundwater Conditions ................................................................................................ 6
4. Assessment Criteria ....................................................................................................................................... 6
4.1. Health and Ecological Investigation Levels (Soils) ........................................................... 7
4.2. Management Limits .......................................................................................................................... 7
4.3. Adopted SILs & GILs ........................................................................................................................... 8
4.4. Waste Classification .......................................................................................................................... 8
5. Conceptual Site Model ................................................................................................................................. 9
6. Data Quality Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 11
7. Sampling and Analysis Plan ..................................................................................................................... 13
7.1. Soil Sampling Methodology ......................................................................................................... 15
7.2. Groundwater Well Details & Sampling Methodology ...................................................16
8. Data Validation Assessment .................................................................................................................... 17
8.1. Fieldwork Quality Control ............................................................................................................. 17
8.2. Laboratory Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) ........................................... 17
9. Laboratory Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 18
9.1. Field Screening................................................................................................................................... 18
9.2. Results ..................................................................................................................................................... 18
9.2.1. Soils ........................................................................................................................................... 18
9.2.2. Groundwater .........................................................................................................................19
9.2.3. Interim Waste Classification Assessment ............................................................19
10. Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................................... 20
11. References ......................................................................................................................................................... 22
12. Limitations ........................................................................................................................................................ 23
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
iii
Figure
Figure 1: Borehole Location Plan
Figure 2: Summary Investigations Plan
Tables
Table 1: Summary of Site Details
Table 2: Summary of Geotechnical Units
Table 3: Depth of Occurrence and Thickness of Geotechnical Units
Table 4: Preliminary Conceptual Site Model
Table 5: Data Quality Objectives
Table 6: Sampling Analysis Quality Plan
Table 7: Soil Sampling Methodology
Table 8: Monitoring Well Construction and Groundwater Sampling Methodology
Appendices
Appendix A: Logs
Appendix B: Laboratory Certificates
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
1
Executive Summary
D&N Geotechnical Pty Ltd were engaged by Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
(Council) to undertake a preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment (SCA) and an
interim in-situ waste classification of Councils proposed headquarters with basement
carpark on this site, see Figure 1. Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd (Ballpark )has reviewed
the previous investigation reports, boreholes logs, laboratory results from soil and
groundwater samples and prepared this preliminary SCA report in cooperation with
D&N Geotechnical.
Previous investigations undertaken by Opus (2017) on the adjoining property, Lot 5,
about 70m to the west of this site had noted the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons at
a depth of 6.5mbgs. The petroleum hydrocarbons were logged from the Unit 2b
Alluvium which previous geotechnical investigations have logged to occur on Lot 5 and
this site from about 3.5m to 11mbgs.
The objective of the preliminary SCA was to provide a preliminary assessment of soil and
groundwater contamination and, if required, provide a basis for a more Detailed Site
Investigation.
Based on review of available previous reports, site observations made during the SCA investigation, the limited soil and groundwater sampling, laboratory analysis, and data interpretation, we conclude that:
• The site of the proposed Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council administration and library building has previously been used for commercial purposes, as the former Council Chambers building, with no-evidence of former contaminating landuse or activities identified on this site.
• Site soils include imported fill material (surface to ~2.0mbgs) comprising sandy gravel with traces of plastic, terracotta and concrete debris, overlying natural silty clay alluvium (Unit 2A) soils which are overlying natural sandy gravel alluvium (Unit 2B) soils to depth of the investigation.
• Measured groundwater standing water levels from monitoring well MW1 installed on this site was 7.1mbgs.
• Field investigations identified no visual or olfactory indicators of soil contamination. Soil samples screened using a Photo-Ionisation Detector (PID) reported low readings with no evidence of volatile organic compounds.
• Laboratory results for analysis of selected soil samples and groundwater sample from MW1 for petroleum hydrocarbons (TRH/BTEX) and metals were below the adopted SILs sourced from Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, (NEPC 2013).
• A preliminary in-situ waste classification prepared for the surplus soils (BH1a, BH2a and BH5a) was classified as general solid waste.
• The site history, site observations, and laboratory results identified no areas of environmental concern on this site.
On the basis of the findings of this preliminary SCA, it is assessed that there is a low
potential risk from soil or groundwater contamination to human health or environment
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
2
on this site. No evidence of soil or groundwater contamination was identified which
would warrant further detailed site investigation or remediation in accordance with the
requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55).
The site is assessed to be suitable for its proposed ongoing commercial use, subject to
the implementation of the following recommendations:
Waste Classification Assessment – During construction works surplus soil requiring
offsite disposal must be assessed and classified prior to being transported to an
appropriately licenced landfill in accordance with the NSW EPA Waste Classification Guidelines 2014.
It is noted that the preliminary testing undertaken does not constitute a detailed waste classification for materials to be excavated from this site. Given the presence of imported fill material of unknown origin we recommend that further sampling and testing is undertaken to satisfy waste classification and/or respective NSW EPA approved resource recovery orders and exemptions.
Unexpected Finds Protocol – An unexpected fines protocol should be included as part of
the Construction Environment Management Plan or as a stand-alone document in the
event that potentially contaminated fill material or buried unexpected finds, such as
asbestos waste, are encountered during construction earthworks.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
3
1. Introduction
D&N Geotechnical Pty Ltd were engaged by Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
(Council) to undertake a preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment (SCA) of Councils
proposed headquarters project on part of Lot 2 DP1179998, see Figure 1, the site. Council
in email of 5 November 2019 requested that an interim waste classification also be
undertaken in the location of proposed basement carpark. Two additional shallow
boreholes (~3mbgs) were developed and soil samples collected from the basement
carpark1.
D&N Geotechnical asked Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd to review the laboratory results
from soil and groundwater samples and to prepare this preliminary SCA report.
D&N Geotechnical previously completed a geotechnical investigation on this site in
June 2019. Opus (2017) had also completed a geotechnical investigation and a
preliminary site investigation (PSI) for the adjoining Lot 5 to the west of the site, see
Figure 2. Based on a review of the previous investigation reports the following points
were noted:
• Hydrocarbons exceeding the ecological screening level (ESL) for F2 C10-C16 were
reported in BH4: 6.5m in the Opus report in the adjoining Lot 5. The borehole was
approximately 70m west of the current site boundary.
• The hydrocarbons were observed within the Unit 2b Alluvium within Lot 5. This
geological unit was logged by D&N Geotechnical at depths ranging from 3.5m to
11m below ground surface (bgs) within the site.
• Only 2 soil samples were analysed within the Unit 2b Alluvium during the Opus PSI
(BH4: 6.0m and 6.5m). At the time no soil samples were collected and analysed at
the depth of groundwater on Lot 5 (~7mbgs).
• Groundwater inflows were recorded between 7.1m and 7.5mbgs during drilling
works undertaken by D&N Geotechnical within the site. Standing water levels
(SWLs) were measured on the 5 June 2019 by D&N field staff for 2 existing
groundwater monitoring wells within Lot 5. The SWLs were recorded at 7.2m
(BH02) and 7.4mbgs (BH07).
• No hydrocarbon odours were observed during D&N’s geotechnical field
investigation in June 2019.
The purpose of the preliminary SCA was to assess soils in the Unit 2b Alluvium to assess
if potentially there is a hydrocarbon smear zone present at the groundwater SWL level
on this site.
The findings from the preliminary SCA soil and groundwater investigation aims to
provide Council with information required to assess if further detailed site
investigation, to assess the vertical and lateral extent of contamination, is necessary.
1 Note. Council proposes to also develop an underground carpark on the adjoining Lot 5. The scope of work for this preliminary SCA and interim waste classification assessment was limited to Lot 2 and did not include an assessment of conditions on Lot 5.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
4
The preliminary SCA was undertaken in general accordance with the proposal prepared
by D&N Geotechnical (Ref: C-0259.00-P3, dated 30 October 2019) and email dated 5
November 2019 for the additional interim waste classification assessment.
2. Objective and Scope of Works
The objective of the preliminary SCA was to provide a preliminary assessment of soil and
groundwater contamination and, if required, provide a basis for a more Detailed Site
Investigation.
The scope of works carried out to meet the above objective is summarised below.
• D&N Geotechnical mobilised a drilling rig to site on Thursday 7 and Friday 8
November 2019 for the site investigation. A service locator was engaged to scan
and identified all services within the site and clear borehole locations prior to
commencement of drilling works.
• A total of 5 boreholes were drilled on the site for the preliminary SCA. Two
boreholes (BH1a, BH4a) were drilled to a depth of 9m bgs and borehole BH3a to a
depth of 10mbgs. Two boreholes (BH2a and BH5a) were drilled to a target depth of
3mbgs on the location of a proposed basement carpark. Discrete soil samples were
collected directly from the drill rig auger at regular intervals to screen for the
presence of petroleum hydrocarbons using a Photo-Ionisation detector (PID). The
PID screening results are shown on the logs provided in Appendix A.
• Additional soil samples were collected from three boreholes (BH1a, BH2a and BH5a)
at the location of a proposed basement carpark on Lot 5 for the purpose of
preparing an interim waste classification by chemical assessment.
• Installation of a groundwater monitoring well within BH1a on the site. A round of
groundwater sampling from this monitoring well was undertaken on the 8
November.
• For this investigation soils within a potential smear zone at the intersection with
the groundwater table (ranging from ~7m to ~9mbgs) were targeted using
continuous standard penetration test (SPT) sampler from depths of 7mbgs to end
of the borehole.
• Laboratory analysis of selected soil and groundwater samples.
• Preparation of this preliminary SCA report.
The following sections of this preliminary SCA report presents the information collected and findings for the site.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
5
3. Site Details
The site location and site layout are shown on Figure 1. The site identification details are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Site Details
Detail Description
Site Address 257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW, (see Figure 1)
Lot / DP Part of Lot 2 DP1179998
Easting / Northing 56 H 703055 m E 6085329 m S
Size (m2) ~ 2,500m2 redevelopment area of the lot.
Surrounding Land Use
North – Commercial buildings South – Commercial and residential buildings. East – Crawford Street adjacent and commercial and residential beyond to the east. West – carpark and commercial buildings.
Sensitive Receptors Residential properties adjacent to the south of the site and beyond Crawford Street to the southeast.
Queanbeyan River is closest permanent waterway and is located approximately ~ 260m down gradient to the east of the site.
3.1. Geology, Hydrogeology & Hydrology
The 1:100,000 scale Geological Map of Canberra, Queanbeyan and surrounds (Sheet 8727, 1st edition, 1992), infers the site is underlain by middle to late Ordovician bedrock of the Pittman Formation; described as comprising interbedded sandstone, siltstone, shale and minor black shale, chert and impure calcareous sandstone.
3.1.1. Subsurface Conditions
The geotechnical profile encountered and identified during the D&N Geotechnical investigation undertaken for the site in July 2019, comprised fill2 consisting of sandy gravel with traces of plastic, terracotta and concrete debris to a depth of approximately 2mbgs, overlying variable Quaternary Alluvium to a maximum depth of 11.5mbgs, underlain by sandstone bedrock.
Based on the findings of the borehole investigation, Ballpark has broadly inferred a similar subsurface profile into generalised geotechnical units for this report for the depth of drilling undertaken during this investigation, which is summarised in Table 2.
2 Note. During site investigation no evidence of asbestos debris was observed in excavated soils. It is possible that asbestos waste may be present mixed with building waste and it is recommended that an unexpected finds protocol be prepared and followed during proposed construction works on this site.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
6
Table 2 provides a summary of the depth of occurrence and thickness of each respective geotechnical unit.
Table 2: Summary of Geotechnical Units
Unit Material Description
1 Fill – sandy GRAVEL, gravelly SILT, silty SAND, clayey SILT, generally fine to coarse, sub-rounded to sub-angular, fine to coarse sand, low plasticity clay.
2a Upper Alluvium – sandy SILT, silty CLAY, clayey SILT, medium to high plasticity, varying amounts of sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel and fine to coarse sands.
2b Lower Alluvium – SAND, silty SAND, gravelly SAND, generally fine to coarse grained, sub-rounded to sub-angular gravel.
Table 3: Depth of Occurrence and Thickness of Geotechnical Units
Unit Material Origin Depth Range to Top of Unit (m)
Range of Unit Thickness (m)
1 FILL 0.0 0.8 – 2.0
2a Upper Alluvium 0.8 – 2.0 1.5 – 2.4
2b Lower Alluvium 3.2 – 3.5 To limit of investigation
3.1.2. Groundwater Conditions
Groundwater inflow was observed during auger drilling at depths of between about 6.6m and 7m.
Groundwater standing water level (SWL) was measured in the groundwater monitoring well installed in BH1a on 8 November 2019 at 7.1m below ground surface (bgs).
The groundwater inflows observed during the D&N Geotechnical investigation were observed marginally deeper at depths ranging from 7.1m to 7.5mbgs. In July 2019 the recorded the SWL from the 2 monitoring wells in the adjacent site to the west at 7.2mbgs (BH07) and 7.4mbgs (BH02).
4. Assessment Criteria
Assessment criteria for soils and groundwater were selected for relevance to the proposed future commercial use of this site.
The criteria discussed below are intended to apply as Tier 1 risk assessment criteria based on certain site-specific characteristics. Where concentrations of a contaminant exceed the adopted assessment criteria, then further consideration of the specific
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
7
exposure pathway is required which may warrant further investigation, assessment or the development of a strategy to mitigate the potential risks identified.
4.1. Health and Ecological Investigation Levels (Soils)
Health and ecological investigation and screening levels for soil presented in Schedule B1 of the ASC NEPM are generally used in NSW when selecting investigation levels for chemical contaminants in soil, (NEPC 2013).
Health and ecological investigation and screening levels are applicable to the first stage (Tier 1) of site assessment and are used to assist in the iterative development of a Conceptual Site Model (CSM).
Health Investigation LeveIs (HILs) are applicable for assessing human health risk via relevant exposure pathways. HILs were developed for a broad range of metals and organic substances. These are generic to all soil types in Australia and apply generally to a depth of 3m below the soil surface for residential sites. For other land uses no specific guidance is provided on depth of application and site-specific conditions are to be used to determine the depth to which HILs apply. For the purpose of this preliminary SCA the HILs are applied to the likely maximum depth of soil disturbance from surface to 3mbgs.
Ecological Investigation Levels (EILs) are associated with selected metals and organic compounds and have been developed for assessing risk to terrestrial ecosystems under residential, open space and commercial/industrial land use scenarios. They apply to the top 2m of accessible soil, which corresponds to the root zone and habitation zone of many plant species.
Ecological Screening Levels (ESLs) are provided in the ASC NEPM for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil to provide Tier 1 ESLs for; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX) compounds, benzo(a)pyrene and F1 (C6-C10) and F2 (>C10-C16) total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) fractions. Similar to EILs the application of ESLs is from the ground surface to a depth of 2m, which generally corresponds with the root zone and habitation zone of plant species in temperate Australia. This site is assessed to have limited ecological value based on its location within an urban central business district. The development will involve construction of buildings with basement carparks, extensive paved surfaces and roadways. Therefore, EILs and ESLs were not assessed for this preliminary SCA report and are not considered further.
Health screening levels (HSLs) have been developed for selected petroleum compounds and fractions and are applicable to assessing human health risk via inhalation after vapour intrusion into indoor air and direct contact with soil and groundwater. These HSLs depend on general soil type (sand, silt and clay mixture), building configurations and land use scenarios.
4.2. Management Limits
In accordance with section 2.9 of Schedule B1 of the ASC NEPM, consideration of Management Limits for petroleum hydrocarbons has been included to assess the potential for accumulation of explosive vapours, the potential risk to buried infrastructure, or the formation of phase separated hydrocarbons (PSH). Management limits for commercial/industrial use are considered relevant for this site and are shown in Table LR2.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
8
4.3. Adopted SILs & GILs
The ASC NEPM presents health investigation levels for different land uses (e.g. commercial/industrial, residential, recreational etc.) as well as ecological investigation levels.
As the planned future use for land within this area of the site is Council premises within an urban setting, we have adopted the guideline criteria for commercial/industrial use as appropriate soil investigation levels (SILs) and groundwater investigation levels (GILs) for the respective contaminants of potential concern (CoPC).
In summary the following ASC NEPM guideline values are adopted as SILs:
• Health investigation level (HIL) for Commercial/Industrial D (see Table 1A(1) HIL A)
• Soil HSLs for vapour intrusion of sandy soils for Commercial/Industrial (see Table 1A(3) HSL D)
• Management Limits for TRH fractions F1-F4 in sandy (coarse) soil for Commercial/Industrial (see Table 1 B(7))
The adopted SILs are presented in the attached Table LR2 with a summary of the laboratory results.
We have adopted the following ASC NEPM guideline values as GILs, see Table LR3:
• Groundwater investigation levels (GILs) for fresh waters (see Table 1C)
• Groundwaters HSL for vapour intrusion (see Table 1A(4)
4.4. Waste Classification
To prepare the interim waste classification of the in-situ soils at the location of the proposed basement carpark on this site selected soil samples were analysed, and the laboratory results compared with the contaminant threshold values (CT1) provide in Table 1 of the NSW EPA (2014) Waste Classification Guidelines Part 1: Classifying Waste.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
9
5. Conceptual Site Model
A conceptual site model (CSM) is a representation of site related information regarding contamination sources, receptors and exposure pathways between those sources and receptors and is based on each of the elements defined in the ASC NEPM.
Based on the desktop review of available reports from previous investigations the known or suspected potential sources of soil and groundwater contamination on this site include:
• Imported fill material located at varying depths up to ~2mbgs on this site. The origins of the fill material are not known and may contain CoPC.
• Groundwater contamination from leaking underground fuel tanks or fuel spills from a nearby service station located upgradient of this site on Lowe Street.
Each of the above are identified as potential Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC) and Table 4 discusses the plausible pollutant linkages identified between the AEC and any nearby sensitive receptors.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
10
Table 4: Preliminary Conceptual Site Model
Source Contaminant of Potential Concern & Known Location
Potential Transport Mechanisms
Exposure Pathway Receptors
Imported Fill Material contamination in soils
Total petroleum hydrocarbons, BTEX compounds, asbestos, pesticides, metals.
Affected Media – imported fill soils, potentially leaching to groundwater and underlying soils at depth.
Disturbance of fill soils during excavations for future construction work.
Dispersion via dust/wind.
Surface water runoff from site.
Ingestion of soils
Dermal contact with soil
Inhalation of dusts and vapours
Plant uptake N/A
Primary human receptors of concern are construction workers and site visitors during development of new building.
Future workers and visitors to the site.
No sensitive ecological receptors identified on or nearby to this urban site.
Soil and Groundwater contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons from nearby service station located on Lowe Street, upgradient of the site.
Total petroleum hydrocarbons, BTEX compounds, metals, in particular lead.
Affected Media – groundwater and underlying soils at depth of groundwater standing water level.
Extraction and beneficial use of groundwater.
Potential ecological impacts to the receiving environment.
Dermal contact
Ingestion
Inhalation of vapours
Plant uptake
Groundwater inflows to nearby Queanbeyan River
Aquatic species uptake
Construction workers
Future users of groundwater on adjoining land
Future occupiers and construction workers
Nearby sensitive receptor of Queanbeyan River, vegetation and ecological environment.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
11
6. Data Quality Objectives
Data quality objectives (DQOs) are developed using a seven-step process and are used
to define the type, quantity and quality of data needed to inform decisions relating to
the environmental condition of a site, see section 18 (Appendix B) of Schedule B2
Guideline on Site Characterisation of NEPC (2013).
DQOs were developed for this preliminary SCA report as shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Data Quality Objectives
DQO Step Description
1. State the problemThe objective of the preliminary SCA is to provide a preliminary
assessment of soil and groundwater contamination and, if required,
provide a basis for a more Detailed Site Investigation.
The main problems are:
• Has the groundwater beneath the site been contaminated by loss
of petroleum hydrocarbons from a nearby service station?
• How many soil bores and groundwater monitoring wells should
be drilled and where?
• Are there access restrictions present that may affect the location
of soil bores and the groundwater monitoring well and the
method(s) used for drilling?
• To what depths should the soil bores and groundwater
monitoring well be drilled/installed?
• At what depth should soil samples be collected?
• What are the contaminants of potential concern for soils and
groundwater on this site?
2. Identify the decision
Potential soil and groundwater contamination issues need to be assessed prior to planned commercial development proceeding on this site.
Is this site suitable for its intended ongoing commercial use?
3. Identify inputs to the decision
The primary inputs to assessing the above include:
• Information gathered from a review of previous investigations
undertaken on this site and the adjoining property to the west.
• Field observations, PID screening results and soil/groundwater
laboratory results.
• Relevant legislation and regulatory guidelines.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
12
DQO Step Description
4. Define the boundaries of the study
The investigation area is defined by the boundaries of the site, as shown in Figure 1. It includes part of Lot 2 DP1179998, 257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW.
The vertical boundary for the study is from the soil surface to the depth of underlying groundwater at this site of about ~7mbgs.
The temporal boundary is the date of the preliminary SCA investigation on 8 November 2019.
5. Develop a decision rule
The decision rule for soil and groundwater for each chemical/layer to
assess the suitability of the site will be as follows:
• QA/QC assessment indicates that the data is usable;
• Where contaminant concentrations for each sample are below the
adopted investigation / screening levels, then no further
assessment is required with respect to that
contaminant/media/area; and
• Where contaminant concentrations are reported to exceed one or
more adopted investigation / screening levels, then additional
investigation or site-specific risk assessment may be required.
Remediation of the site would be recommended where the risk
has been shown to be unacceptable.
6. Acceptable limits on decision error
There are two main sources of false results which may cause decision
errors:
• Sampling errors, which occur when the samples collected are not
representative of the conditions within the investigation area; and
• Measurement errors, which occur during sample collection,
handling, preparation, analysis and data reduction.
False results may lead the decision maker to make the following
errors:
• Type I: deciding that the soil and/or groundwater is not
contaminated and, therefore, the site is suitable for ongoing
commercial use when the reverse is true; and
• Type II: deciding that the soil and/or groundwater is contaminated
and, therefore, the site is not suitable for commercial use when the
reverse is true.
An assessment will be made as to the likelihood of a Type I decision
error being made based on the results of a QA/QC assessment and the
closeness of the data to assessment criteria. Additionally, statistical
methods may be used, where applicable, such as 95% Upper
Confidence Limit (UCL) calculations. The investigation levels for
assessment are nominated in section 4. A Type II error would result in
additional investigation which almost certainly would allow correction
of that error.
7. Optimise the design for obtaining data
Based on the previous Steps 1 to 6 of the DQO process, the optimal design for obtaining the required data is presented in section 7 Sampling and Analysis Plan.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
13
7. Sampling and Analysis Plan
A Sampling and Analysis Quality Plan (SAQP) was developed and implemented for the preliminary SCA based on the investigation DQOs, see section 6. The preliminary SCA sampling plan included:
• Drilling of 5 boreholes within the site and the collection and analyses of 17 soil samples and 1 groundwater sample from within the site.
• Two duplicate and one triplicate soil samples were collected for quality assurance purposes in accordance with Australian Standards (AS4482:2005).
Selected samples were submitted for laboratory analysis for the following contaminants of potential concern (CoPC) in soil and groundwater as summarised in Table 6.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
14
Table 6: Sampling Analysis Quality Plan
Media CoPC Primary Samples
QA/QC (Duplicate)
Sample
QA/QC (Triplicate)
Sample
Wash Blank Trip Spike/ Blank
TOTAL
Soil – Preliminary SCA & Interim Waste Classification (8 primary samples)
Metals Suite 17 2 1 1 21
TRH 17 2 1 1 21
BTEX 17 2 1 1 2 23
Groundwater Metals Suite 1 1
TRH 1 1
BTEX 1 1
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
15
7.1. Soil Sampling Methodology
The preliminary SCA works followed the soil and groundwater sampling methodology outlined in Table 7 & 8, respectively.
Table 7: Soil Sampling Methodology
Activity Detail / Comments
Underground Services Dial-Before-You-Dig (DBYD) service plans for the site and
immediately surrounding area were obtained and reviewed prior to
commencement of intrusive investigation works.
A service locator was engaged to scan and identified all services
within the site prior to commencement of the drilling program.
Borehole Drilling Program
Drilling work was undertaken on 7 and 8 November 2019 by GE
Drilling, a licenced drilling contractor.
A total of 5 boreholes were drilled using solid flight augers at
selected areas across the site. Three boreholes were drilled to a
maximum depth of 10m below surface targeting the soils around the
groundwater level.
The remaining two boreholes were drilling to 3m bgs targeting the
proposed underground carpark in the southern portion of the site.
The deeper BH1 was also in the proposed basement carpark and was
sampled in the upper soil profile.
Field borehole logs were prepared for each of the 5 boreholes and
are presented in Appendix A.
Soil Screening and
Sample Collection
Preliminary SCA
• Samples were collected for screening purposes directly from the
auger in the upper 6m of the soil profile in boreholes BH1, BH2
and BH3. These samples were screened in the field using a
calibrated PID to assess the potential presence of ionisable
volatile organic compounds (VOC). The PID readings are shown
on the field borehole logs, see Appendix A.
• SPT sampling was undertaken continually from around the
groundwater level at depths of 7-7.45m, 7.5-7.95m, 8-8.45m and
8.5-8.95m.
Interim Waste Classification Assessment
• Soil samples from were collected directly from the auger at
depths of 0.5m, 1m, 2m and 3m bgs in boreholes BH1, BH4 and
BH5. These samples were also screened with the PID and
readings are shown on the field borehole logs, see Appendix A.
Duplicate and triplicate soil samples were also collected for quality
assurance purposes in accordance with Australian Standards
(AS4482).
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
16
Activity Detail / Comments
Sample Handling & Transportation
A clean pair of disposable nitrile gloves was used to collect each
sample. Soil samples were placed into laboratory prepared and
supplied glass jars, fitted with Teflon lined seals to limit possible
volatile loss. Sample jars were filled to minimise headspace.
Separate samples for soil screening were collected and placed in a
sealed labelled zip lock bag.
The soil samples were placed into ice chilled coolers and dispatched to a National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) accredited laboratories (Eurofins MGT in Sydney and Melbourne were the primary and secondary laboratories) for analysis under chain of custody (CoC) control. CoC’s are included with the laboratory certificates in Appendix B.
Decontamination of sampling equipment
Multi-use sampling equipment, including solid flight augers and a
SPT sampler, were decontaminated by brush scrubbing with Decon
90™ solution and rinsed with clean potable water between
investigation locations.
A wash blank sample was collected following completion of the field
investigation and analysed by the laboratory.
QA/QC Samples To measure the accuracy and precision of the data generated by the
field and laboratory procedures for this assessment, additional
samples were collected and analysed the following quality
assurance / quality control (QA/QC) samples:
• Two intra-laboratory duplicate soil samples (QC01 & QC02)
• One inter-laboratory triplicate soil sample (QC02)
• A trip spike and trip blank were also included with the soil
samples and analysed by the laboratory.
7.2. Groundwater Well Details & Sampling Methodology
Details of the monitoring well construction and groundwater sampling methodology are provided in Table 8.
Table 8: Monitoring Well Construction and Groundwater Sampling Methodology
Activity Detail / Comments
Well Construction & Development
A single groundwater monitoring well was installed in BH01. The
well was constructed using a 50mm diameter PVC pipe. A 3m length
of slotted screen was installed from the base of the borehole (8m) to
5m, with the remaining lengths solid PVC to the surface.
The well annulus was backfilled with clean graded sand to
approximately 1m above the screen level and then sealed with a
bentonite plug approximately0.5m thickness. A flush fitting gatic
cover was concreted in place to protect the well cap.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
17
Activity Detail / Comments
The well was developed using a dedicated disposable bailer
following completion of the groundwater well installation on the 7
November 2019.
Well GaugingThe monitoring well was gauged prior to sampling on 8 November
2019 using an oil/water Interface Probe to record the depth to
groundwater and the presence of Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid
(NAPL). No NAPL was detected in the wells.
Groundwater sampling
method
The groundwater sample was collected using a new dedicated
disposable bailer and a clean pair of disposable nitrile gloves.
The groundwater sample was immediately placed into laboratory
supplied bottles with appropriate preservatives and placed into a
chilled cooler.
Groundwater samples were dispatched to National Association of
Testing Authorities (NATA) accredited laboratories (Eurofins MGT in
Sydney and Melbourne were the primary and secondary
laboratories) for analysis under chain of custody (CoC) control. CoC’s
are included with the laboratory certificates in Appendix B.
Decontamination of
sampling equipment
A dedicated, single use disposable sampling equipment was used to
collect the sample from the monitoring well which does not require
decontamination.
QA/QC SamplesThe QA/QC sampling undertaken for this investigation were
discussed in Table 7 above under the soil sampling methodology.
8. Data Validation Assessment
8.1. Fieldwork Quality Control
The field quality control was generally in accordance with the DQOs, see section 6, and included the following elements.
• Sampling was performed by a qualified and experienced engineering geologist from D&N Geotechnical. Soil and groundwater samples were collected in accordance with NSW EPA approved guidelines and current industry practice.
• Collection and analysis of two blind duplicate (intra-laboratory) and one blind triplicate (inter-laboratory) soil sample, see Table LR1.
• Samples (as designated on the chain of custody form) were transported in insulated containers to Eurofins mgt, NATA accredited laboratory for analysis. A copy of the chain of custody form is provided in Appendix B.
8.2. Laboratory Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC)
An assessment of QA/QC is provided below which assesses; data completeness, comparability, representativeness, precision, and accuracy based on field and laboratory considerations and processes for assessment of data quality, see section 19 (Appendix C) of Schedule B2 Guideline on Site Characterisation of ASC NEPM.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
18
Soil samples were transported under chain of custody conditions in an insulated container to Eurofins MGT laboratory in Sydney and Melbourne which is NATA accredited for the analyses performed. A copy of the chain of custody is included with the laboratory data provided in Appendix B.
The laboratory conducted internal quality control using laboratory duplicates, spikes and
method blanks. The results are shown with the laboratory report sheets in Appendix B.
Analytical methods used for the laboratory testing are also indicated on the laboratory
report sheets. The results of laboratory quality control testing are assessed to be within
acceptable limits.
Additional soil samples were collected for QA/QC purposes including 2 duplicate and 1
triplicate sample, which were submitted for analysis. Reported exceedances of the
relative percentage difference (RPD) 50% control limits was found in triplicate pair BH5;
0.5m / QC02 reporting an RPD value of 67% for arsenic. The RPD exceedances are
considered to be due to the heterogeneous nature of metals in the soil. A wash blank
and trip spike/blank were also analysed by the laboratory.
Based on the results it is considered that the field and laboratory methods are
appropriate, and that the data obtained is usable and considered to reasonably
represent the concentrations at the sampling points at the time of sampling. Overall, it is
assessed that the results are acceptable for the purposes of this investigation.
9. Laboratory Analysis
Samples were analysed by Eurofins MGT laboratories in Sydney (primary laboratory), and
Melbourne (secondary laboratory). Both laboratories are NATA accredited for the
analytes selected.
Selected soil samples and the groundwater sample were submitted for laboratory
analysis for a suite of CoPC as summarised in Table 6. Soil samples for the preliminary
SCA were selected to characterise the soils around the groundwater table within the
site. The interim waste classification assessment was targeted in the upper 3m of the
soil profile with the extent of the proposed basement carpark.
9.1. Field Screening
Soil samples were screened for presence of volatile hydrocarbons using a PID. The PID readings ranged between 0.1 ppm and 20.9 ppm (BH4 (0.5m)). Individual PID readings are reported on the logs for the boreholes provided in Appendix A.
9.2. Results
9.2.1. Soils
The laboratory test results for soil samples are summarised in Table LR2 and laboratory certificates of analysis are present in Appendix B. Comparison of soil concentrations to the adopted SILs discussed in section 4.3 and provided in Table LR2 is as follows:
• Concentrations of metals were below the adopted investigation levels or the laboratory’s LOR in the samples analysed.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
19
• Concentrations of TRH were below the adopted investigation levels or the laboratory’s LOR in the samples analysed. Hydrocarbons were reported in BH2a: 1m collected from the existing fill material onsite. Reporting concentrations of 110 mg/kg (TRH C16-C34) and 130 mg/kg (TRH >C34-C40), however well below the adopted SILs of 1,700 mg/kg and 3,300 mg/kg, respectively.
• Concentrations of BTEX were below the adopted investigation levels and the laboratory’s LOR in the samples analysed.
9.2.2. Groundwater
The laboratory test results for groundwater monitoring event on 8 November 2019 are summarised in Table LR3 and laboratory certificates of analysis are present in Appendix B. Comparison of groundwater concentrations in MW1 to the adopted GILs discussed in section 4.3 and provided in Table LR3 is as follows:
• Concentrations of copper exceeded the adopted GIL of 1.4 μg/L, reporting concentrations of 2 μg/L.
• Concentrations (250 μg/L) of TRH C6-C10 (F1) were reported, however below the adopted GIL of 6,000 μg/L.
• Toluene (6 μg/L) was reported above the LOR.
9.2.3. Interim Waste Classification Assessment
The laboratory test results for soil samples are summarised in Table LR4 and laboratory certificates of analysis are present in Appendix B. Comparison of soil concentrations to the acceptance criteria discussed in section 4.4 and provided in Table LR4 is as follows:
To assess the preliminary waste classification of the in-situ soils within the site the laboratory test results were compared contaminant threshold values (CT1) provided in Table 1 of the NSW EPA (2014) Waste Classification Guidelines.
The following points are noted from these results:
• Concentrations of metals were below the CT1 or the laboratory’s limit of reporting (LOR).
• Concentrations of TRH and BTEX were below the CT1 or the laboratory’s LOR in the samples analysed.
Based on the laboratory results for the surplus soil samples analysed from boreholes; BH1a, BH2a and BH5a the imported fill material and underlying Unit 2A alluvium soils to be excavated from the proposed basement carpark, to a depth of 3mbgs, are assessed to have an interim waste classification as general solid waste.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
20
10. Conclusions
The preliminary SCA was undertaken to assess if soils and groundwater located in the
Unit 2b Alluvium at the depth of the groundwater table (~7mbgs) on this site are
contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons.
Previous investigations undertaken by Opus (2017) on the adjoining property, Lot 5,
about 70m to the west of this site had noted the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons at
a depth of 6.5mbgs. The petroleum hydrocarbons were logged from the Unit 2b
Alluvium which previous geotechnical investigations have logged to occur on Lot 5 and
this site from about 3.5m to 11mbgs.
The objective of the preliminary SCA was to provide a preliminary assessment of soil and
groundwater contamination and, if required, provide a basis for a more Detailed Site
Investigation.
In addition, Council has requested that an interim waste classification assessment also
be undertaken for surplus in-situ soils at the location of a proposed underground
carpark in the south of the site.
Based on review of available previous reports, site observations made during the SCA investigation, the soil and groundwater sampling, laboratory analysis, and data interpretation, we conclude that:
• The site of the proposed Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council administration and library building has previously been used for commercial purposes, as the former Council Chambers building, with no-evidence of former contaminating landuse or activities identified on this site.
• Site soils include imported fill material (surface to ~2.0mbgs) comprising sandy gravel with traces of plastic, terracotta and concrete debris, overlying natural silty clay alluvium (Unit 2A) soils which are overlying natural sandy gravel alluvium (Unit 2B) soils to depth of the investigation.
• Measured groundwater standing water levels from monitoring well MW1 installed on this site was 7.1mbgs.
• Field investigations identified no visual or olfactory indicators of soil contamination. Soil samples screened using a PID reported low readings with no evidence of volatile organic compounds.
• Laboratory results for analysis of selected soil samples and groundwater sample from MW1 for petroleum hydrocarbons (TRH/BTEX) and metals were below the adopted SILs sourced from Schedule B1 – Guideline on Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, (NEPC 2013).
• A preliminary in-situ waste classification prepared for the surplus soils (BH1a, BH2a and BH5a) was classified as general solid waste.
• The site history, site observations, and laboratory results identified no areas of environmental concern on this site.
On the basis of the findings of this preliminary SCA, it is assessed that there is a low
potential risk from soil or groundwater contamination to human health or environment
on this site. No evidence of soil or groundwater contamination was identified which
would warrant further detailed site investigation or remediation in accordance with the
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
21
requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55).
The site is assessed to be suitable for its proposed ongoing commercial use, subject to
the implementation of the following recommendations:
Waste Classification Assessment – During construction works surplus soil requiring
offsite disposal must be assessed and classified prior to being transported to an
appropriately licenced landfill in accordance with the NSW EPA Waste Classification Guidelines 2014.
It is noted that the preliminary testing undertaken does not constitute a detailed waste classification for materials to be excavated from this site. Given the presence of imported fill material of unknown origin we recommend that further sampling and testing is undertaken to satisfy waste classification and/or respective NSW EPA approved resource recovery orders and exemptions.
Unexpected Finds Protocol – An unexpected fines protocol should be included as part of
the Construction Environment Management Plan or as a stand-alone document in the
event that potentially contaminated fill material or buried unexpected finds, such as
asbestos waste, are encountered during construction earthworks.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
22
11. References
Australian Standard (2005) Guide to the Sampling and Investigation of Sites with Potentially Contaminated Soil. Part 1: Non volatile and Semi volatile Compounds. AS4482.1-2005.
D&N Geotechnical (2019). QPRC HQ Development – Geotechnical Investigation Report.Report prepared for Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council. Ref. C-0259.00 R2, dated 19
July 2019.
DUAP EPA (1998). Managing Land Contamination Planning Guidelines, SEPP 55 – Remediation of Land. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning & Environmental Protection Authority NSW, Sydney
NEPC (2013). National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999 (amended 2013) (ASC NEPM). National Environmental Protection Council, Canberra
NSW EPA (2017). Contaminated Land Management: Guidelines for the NSW Site Auditor Scheme (3rd Edition). Environment Protection Authority NSW, Sydney
NSW EPA. (2015). Guidelines on the Duty to Report Contamination under the Contaminated Land Management Act 1997. Environment Protection Authority NSW, Sydney
NSW EPA (2014). Waste Classification Guidelines - Part 1: Classifying Waste. Environment Protection Authority NSW, Sydney
NSW EPA (2011). Contaminated Sites: Guidelines for Consultants Reporting on Contaminated Sites. Environmental Protection Authority NSW, Sydney
NSW EPA. (1995). Contaminated Sites: Sampling Design Guidelines. Environment
Protection Authority NSW, Sydney
Opus. (2017). Preliminary Site Investigation – Proposed Queanbeyan Headquarters
Administration Building. Report prepared for Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council.
Ref. T-C0294.00, dated 31 July 2017.
Victoria EPA. (2010). Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines (7), Sampling and Analysis: Soil Sampling. Victoria Environmental Protection Authority, Melbourne.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
23
12. Limitations
The findings contained in this preliminary SCA report are the result of discrete/specific methodologies used in accordance with normal practices and standards. To the best of our knowledge, they represent a reasonable interpretation of the current groundwater conditions at the time of sampling and analysis. Under no circumstances, however, can it be considered that these findings represent the actual state of the site at all points.
In preparing this report, current guidelines for assessment and management of groundwater were followed. This work has been conducted in good faith in accordance with D&N Geotechnical and Ballpark Environmental understanding of the client’s brief and general accepted practice for environmental consulting.
This report was prepared for Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council, with the objective
of the preliminary SCA to provide a preliminary assessment of soil and groundwater
contamination and, if required, provide a basis for a more Detailed Site Investigation.
The work was conducted, and the preliminary SCA report has been prepared, in response to specific instructions from the client to whom this preliminary SCA report is addressed, within the time and budgetary requirements of the client, and in reliance on certain data and information made available to D&N Geotechnical and Ballpark Environmental. The analyses, evaluations, opinions and conclusions presented in this preliminary SCA report are based on those instructions, requirements, data or information, and they could change if such instructions etc. are in fact inaccurate or incomplete.
No warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the information and professional advice included in this preliminary SCA report. The preliminary SCA report is not intended for other parties or other uses. Anyone using this document does so at their own risk and should satisfy themselves concerning its applicability and, where necessary, should seek expert advice in relation to the particular situation.
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark Environmental BPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
Figure
Client: Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
Drawn:JP
Project:Preliminary Soil Contamination
Assessment
Approved: AB
Date: 2 Dec 2019
Title: Borehole Location Plan Scale: NTS
project no: BPE9094 – R01
Figure no:Figure 1
Original Size: A4
BH1a
BH2a
BH3a BH5a
BH4a
Client: Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Drawn: JP
Project:Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment, 257
Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW 2620
Approved: AB
Date: 2 Dec 2019
Title: Summary Investigations Plan Scale: NTS
project no: BPE19094 – R01 Figure no: Figure 2 Original Size: A4
11.2m / 7.5m10.2m / 7.4m
11.0m
???
?
Legend:
Opus Borehole Locations (2017)
D&N Borehole Locations (2019)
Borehole Locations (SCA 2019)
10.2m/ 7.4m^
Depth to rock/ groundwater inflows (^ SWL measured)
Inferred contours based on D&N investigation
?
10.6m/ 7.3m
BH1a / 7.1m^
BH5a
BH4a / 7.0m
BH3a / 6.7m
BH2a
Inferred contours provided in OPUS (2017) report
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark Environmental BPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
Tables
Table LR1: Results of Quality Control Soil Samples
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
SampleRPD (%)
Primary
Sample
Triplicate
SampleRPD (%)
Primary
Sample
Duplicate
SampleRPD (%)
Sample ID BH5a QC01 BH5a QC02 BH4 QC03
Depth (m) 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 2
Material Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Soil Water Soil Soil
Date of Sampling 8-Nov-19 8-Nov-19 8-Nov-19 8-Nov-19 8-Nov-19 8-Nov-19 08-Nov-19
Metals
Arsenic 3.6 3.1 15 5.8 2.9 67 5.1 5.7 11 < 0.001 - -
Cadmium < 0.4 < 0.4 NA < 0.4 < 0.4 NA < 0.4 < 0.4 NA < 0.0002 - -
Chromium 19 22 15 21 16 27 26 29 11 < 0.001 - -
Copper 7.5 9.5 24 13 8.5 42 15 16 6 < 0.001 - -
Lead 22 21 5 18 24 29 14 15 7 < 0.001 - -
Mercury < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.0001 - -
Nickel 9.5 10 5 12 8.1 39 17 21 21 < 0.001 - -
Zinc 49 65 28 52 58 11 39 43 10 < 0.005 - -
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons
Naphthalene < 0.5 < 0.5 NA < 0.5 < 0.5 NA < 0.5 < 0.5 NA < 0.01 - -
TRH >C10-C16 < 50 < 50 NA < 50 < 50 NA < 50 < 50 NA < 0.05 - -
TRH >C10-C16 (F2) < 50 < 50 NA < 50 < 50 NA < 50 < 50 NA < 0.05 - -
TRH >C10-C40 < 100 < 100 NA < 100 < 100 NA < 100 < 100 NA < 0.1 - -
TRH >C16-C34 < 100 < 100 NA < 100 < 100 NA < 100 < 100 NA < 0.1 - -
TRH >C34-C40 < 100 < 100 NA < 100 < 100 NA < 100 < 100 NA < 0.1 - -
TRH C6-C10 < 20 < 20 NA < 20 < 20 NA < 20 < 20 NA < 0.02 - -
TRH C6-C10 (F1) < 20 < 20 NA < 20 < 20 NA < 20 < 20 NA < 0.02 - -
BTEX
Benzene < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.001 110 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.001 100 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes < 0.2 < 0.2 NA < 0.2 < 0.2 NA < 0.2 < 0.2 NA < 0.002 100 < 0.2
o-Xylene < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.001 100 < 0.1
Toluene < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.1 < 0.1 NA < 0.001 100 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total < 0.3 < 0.3 NA < 0.3 < 0.3 NA < 0.3 < 0.3 NA < 0.003 100 < 0.3
Notes:
Value RPD exceeds control limit of 50%
NA At least one sample has concentration below laboratory's Limit of Reporting (LOR)
Trip
Blank
%RPD between
BH5a: 0.5m and QC01
%RPD between
BH5a: 0.5m and QC02
%RPD between
BH4a: 2m and QC03
Wash
Blank
Trip
Spike
Ballpark Environmental
BPE19094-R01
2 December 2019
All results in mg/kg, unless otherwise stated.
Arsenic Cadmium Chromium (Total) Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Zinc Benzene Ethylbenzene m&p-Xylenes o-Xylene Toluene Xylenes - Total
BH1a 0.5 Soil 07-Nov-19 2.8 < 0.4 18 6.6 18 < 0.1 9.2 47 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH1a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.7 < 0.4 26 16 14 < 0.1 15 36 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH1a 7-7.45 Soil 07-Nov-19 10 < 0.4 12 14 11 < 0.1 8.5 24 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH1a 7.5-7.95 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.1 < 0.4 8.3 5.1 < 5 < 0.1 6.1 16 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH1a 8.5-8.95 Soil 07-Nov-19 2.4 < 0.4 8.7 < 5 < 5 < 0.1 6.6 25 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH2a 1 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.6 < 0.4 18 9.3 20 < 0.1 9 65 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH2a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19 4.3 < 0.4 27 16 16 < 0.1 16 65 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH3a 6 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.8 < 0.4 12 8.7 6.9 < 0.1 8.9 24 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH3a 7-7.45 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.7 < 0.4 14 10 6 < 0.1 12 27 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH3a 8.5-8.95 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.7 < 0.4 10 5.6 5.6 < 0.1 7.3 21 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19 5.8 < 0.4 24 13 27 < 0.1 14 64 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 2 Soil 08-Nov-19 5.8 < 0.4 21 13 18 < 0.1 12 52 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 7-7.45 Soil 08-Nov-19 3.3 < 0.4 50 8.3 7.3 < 0.1 19 29 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 7.5-7.95 Soil 08-Nov-19 4 < 0.4 13 8.9 6.6 < 0.1 10 22 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 8-8.45 Soil 08-Nov-19 4.4 < 0.4 11 7.3 8.1 < 0.1 8.6 23 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH5a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19 3.6 < 0.4 19 7.5 22 < 0.1 9.5 49 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH5a 3 Soil 08-Nov-19 5.1 < 0.4 26 15 14 < 0.1 17 39 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
4.35 - 18.71 10.27 13.37 - 11.10 36.94 - - - - - -
5.1 - 50 16 27 - 19 65 - - - - - -
3.6 - 8.3 5.1 5.6 - 6.1 16 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
1.7 - 10.2 3.7 6.7 - 3.8 16.8 - - - - - -
Guidelines
HILs - Commercial/ Industrial D (See Table 1A(1)) 3,000 900 240,000 1,500 730 6,000 400,000
0m to < 1m 3 NL NL 230
1m to <2m 3 NL NL NL
2m to <4m 3 NL NL NL
4m+ 3 NL NL NL
0m to < 1m 4 NL NL NL
1m to <2m 6 NL NL NL
2m to <4m 9 NL NL NL
4m+ 20 NL NL NL
Coarse
Fine
Notes:
BOLD Concentrations exceeds the adopted guideline value
NL Not Limiting
< LOR Concentrations below the Laboratory's Limit of Reporting
- Not analysed
Sample ID Depth (m) MaterialDate of
Sampling
Metals BTEX
HS
L D
Va
po
ur
Intr
usio
n -
Co
mm
erc
ial/
Ind
ustr
ial
(Se
e T
ab
le
A(3
))
Su
mm
ary
Sta
ts
Average
Maximum
Minimum
Standard Deviation
No. Observations
SA
ND
Table LR2 - Summary of Laboratory Results for
Preliminary SCA Soil Samples
NE
PM
20
13
Management Limits for TPH
fractions F1-F4 in soil (Commercial
and industrial) (See Table 1 B(7))
HS
L D
Va
po
ur
Intr
usi
on
-
Co
mm
erc
ial/
Ind
ust
ria
l (S
ee
Ta
ble
A(3
))
CL
AY
Ballpark Environmental
BPE19094-R01
2 December 2019
All results in mg/kg, unless otherwise stated.
BH1a 0.5 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH1a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH1a 7-7.45 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH1a 7.5-7.95 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH1a 8.5-8.95 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH2a 1 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH2a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH3a 6 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH3a 7-7.45 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH3a 8.5-8.95 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH4a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH4a 2 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH4a 7-7.45 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH4a 7.5-7.95 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH4a 8-8.45 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH5a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH5a 3 Soil 08-Nov-19
Guidelines
HILs - Commercial/ Industrial D (See Table 1A(1))
0m to < 1m
1m to <2m
2m to <4m
4m+
0m to < 1m
1m to <2m
2m to <4m
4m+
Coarse
Fine
Notes:
BOLD Concentrations exceeds the adopted guideline value
NL Not Limiting
< LOR Concentrations below the Laboratory's Limit of Reporting
- Not analysed
Sample ID Depth (m) MaterialDate of
SamplingH
SL
D V
ap
ou
r
Intr
usio
n -
Co
mm
erc
ial/
Ind
ustr
ial
(Se
e T
ab
le
A(3
))
Su
mm
ary
Sta
ts
Average
Maximum
Minimum
Standard Deviation
No. Observations
SA
ND
Table LR2 - Summary of Laboratory Results for
Preliminary SCA Soil Samples
NE
PM
20
13
Management Limits for TPH
fractions F1-F4 in soil (Commercial
and industrial) (See Table 1 B(7))
HS
L D
Va
po
ur
Intr
usi
on
-
Co
mm
erc
ial/
Ind
ust
ria
l (S
ee
Ta
ble
A(3
))
CL
AY
Naphthalene TRH >C10-C16 TRH >C10-C16 (F2) TRH >C10-C40 TRH >C16-C34 TRH >C34-C40 TRH C6-C10 TRH C6-C10 (F1)
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 240 110 130 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
- - - - - - - -
- - - 240 110 130 - -
< 0.5 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 < 20 < 20
- - - - - - - -
NL NL 260
NL NL 370
NL NL 630
NL NL NL
NL NL 310
NL NL 480
NL NL NL
NL NL NL
1,000 3,500 10,000 700
1,000 5,000 10,000 800
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons
Ballpark Environmental
BPE19094-R01
2 December 2019
Table LR3 - Summary of Laboratory Results for Groundwater Sample
All results in μg/L, unless otherwise stated.
Arsenic* Cadmium Chromium^ (Total) Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Zinc
BH1a - Water 08-Nov-19 < 1 < 0.2 < 1 2 < 1 < 0.1 3 7
Guidelines
NEPM 2013 Fresh 13 0.2 1 1.4 3.4 0.06 11 8
Naphthalene TRH >C10-C16 TRH >C10-C16 (F2) TRH >C10-C40 TRH >C16-C34 TRH >C34-C40 TRH C6-C10 TRH C6-C10 (F1)
BH1a - Water 08-Nov-19 < 10 < 50 < 50 < 100 < 100 < 100 260 250
Guidelines
Groundwater HSLs for Vapour Intrusion (4m to <8m Sand)+ 6,000
Fresh 16
Benzene Ethylbenzene m&p-Xylenes o-Xylene Toluene Xylenes - Total
BH1a - Water 08-Nov-19 < 1 < 1 < 2 < 1 6 < 3
Guidelines
Vapour Intrusion (4m to <8m Sand) 5,000
Fresh 950 200 350
Notes:
BOLD Concentrations exceeds the adopted guideline value
NL Not Limiting
< LOR Concentrations below the Laboratories Limit of Reporting
+ See Table 1A(4) Groundwater HSLs for Vapour Intrusion, NEPM (2013)* Arsenic guideline values are based on As V^ Chromium guideline values are based on Cr VI
NEPM 2013
Note the reported laboratory results have been updated from mg/L to μg/L to a line with the Table 1C
Groundwater Investigation Levels (GILs) NEPM (2013).
Groundwater Investigation Levels
Sample ID Depth (m) Material
NEPM 2013
Date of SamplingBTEX
Groundwater Investigation Levels
Date of SamplingTotal Recoverable Hydrocarbons
Sample ID Depth (m) Material
Metals
Groundwater Investigation Levels
Sample ID Depth (m) Material Date of Sampling
Ballpark Environmental
BPE19094-R01
2 December 2019
All results in mg/kg, unless otherwise stated.
Arsenic Cadmium Chromium (Total) Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Zinc Benzene Ethylbenzene m&p-Xylenes o-Xylene Toluene Xylenes - Total
BH1a 0.5 Soil 07-Nov-19 2.8 < 0.4 18 6.6 18 < 0.1 9.2 47 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH1a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.7 < 0.4 26 16 14 < 0.1 15 36 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH2a 1 Soil 07-Nov-19 3.6 < 0.4 18 9.3 20 < 0.1 9 65 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH2a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19 4.3 < 0.4 27 16 16 < 0.1 16 65 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19 5.8 < 0.4 24 13 27 < 0.1 14 64 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH4a 2 Soil 08-Nov-19 5.8 < 0.4 21 13 18 < 0.1 12 52 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH5a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19 3.6 < 0.4 19 7.5 22 < 0.1 9.5 49 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
BH5a 3 Soil 08-Nov-19 5.1 < 0.4 26 15 14 < 0.1 17 39 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
4.35 - 22.38 12.05 18.63 - 12.71 52.13 - - - - - -
5.1 - 27 16 27 - 17 65 - - - - - -
3.6 - 18 6.6 14 - 9 36 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.2 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.3
1.1 - 3.8 3.8 4.4 - 3.2 11.6 - - - - - -
Guidelines
100 20 100 4 40 10 600 288 1,000
400 80 400 16 160 40 2,400 1,152 4,000
20 0.5 75 100 50 0.5 30 150
40 1 150 200 100 1 60 300 0.5 65 25 15
Notes:
BOLD Concentrations exceeds the adopted guideline value
NL Not Limiting
< LOR Concentrations below the Laboratory's Limit of Reporting
- Not analysed
EN
M
Ex
em
pti
on
(20
14)
Column 2: Maximum Average Concentration for
Characterisation (See Table 4)
Column 3: Absolute Maximum Concentration for
Characterisation (See Table 4)
NS
W E
PA
(2
014
)
Wa
ste
Cla
ssif
ica
tio
n
Gu
ide
lin
es
General Solid Waste - CT1
(See Table 1 - CT1 & CT2 values for classifying waste by
chemical assessment without TCLP test)
Restricted Solid Waste - CT2
(See Table 1 - CT1 & CT2 values for classifying waste by
chemical assessment without TCLP test)
Standard Deviation
Su
mm
ary
Sta
ts
No. Observations
Average
Maximum
Minimum
Table LR4 - Summary of Laboratory Results for Preliminary Waste
Classification Soil Samples
BTEX Sample ID Depth (m) Material Date of Sampling
Metals
Ballpark Environmental
BPE19094-R01
2 December 2019
All results in mg/kg, unless otherwise stated.
BH1a 0.5 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH1a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH2a 1 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH2a 2 Soil 07-Nov-19
BH4a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH4a 2 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH5a 0.5 Soil 08-Nov-19
BH5a 3 Soil 08-Nov-19
Guidelines
Notes:
BOLD Concentrations exceeds the adopted guideline value
NL Not Limiting
< LOR Concentrations below the Laboratory's Limit of Reporting
- Not analysed
EN
M
Ex
em
pti
on
(20
14)
Column 2: Maximum Average Concentration for
Characterisation (See Table 4)
Column 3: Absolute Maximum Concentration for
Characterisation (See Table 4)
NS
W E
PA
(2
014
)
Wa
ste
Cla
ssif
ica
tio
n
Gu
ide
lin
es
General Solid Waste - CT1
(See Table 1 - CT1 & CT2 values for classifying waste by
chemical assessment without TCLP test)
Restricted Solid Waste - CT2
(See Table 1 - CT1 & CT2 values for classifying waste by
chemical assessment without TCLP test)
Standard Deviation
Su
mm
ary
Sta
ts
No. Observations
Average
Maximum
Minimum
Table LR4 - Summary of Laboratory Results for Preliminary Waste
Classification Soil Samples
Sample ID Depth (m) Material Date of Sampling
TRH C10-C36 (Total) TRH C10-C14 TRH C15-C28 TRH C29-C36 TRH C6-C9
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
< 20 150 50 100 < 20
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
8 8 8 8 8
- - - - -
- 150 50 100 -
< 20 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 20
- - - - -
10,000 650
40,000 2,600
250
500
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
Ballpark Environmental
BPE19094-R01
2 December 2019
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
Appendix A Logs
GW
GW-GM
ML
ML
CI
ML
SW
SW
SPT3, 3, 5N=8
SPT4, 6, 12N=18
E
E
E
E
E
E
08/1
1/19
HA
AD
/T
N
FILL: ASPHALT: black, (20 mm thickness).
FILL: Sandy GRAVEL: fine to coarse grained,sub-angular, grey, fine to coarse sand, trace lowplasticity silt fines.
FILL: Silty Sandy GRAVEL: fine to coarse grained,sub-angular, brown, grey, fine to coarse sand, lowplasticity silt fines, with some terracotta and concretefragments.
FILL: Gravelly Sandy SILT: low liquid limit, palebrown, fine to coarse sand, fine to coarse, sub-angulargravel.
Sandy SILT: low liquid limit, pale brown, red-brown,fine to medium sand.
Silty CLAY: medium plasticity, red-brown, trace finesand.
Sandy SILT: low liquid limit, pale brown, mottledorange-brown, fine sand.
SAND: fine to coarse grained, brown, trace lowplasticity clay fines.
SAND: fine to coarse grained, brown, with some fine,sub-angular gravel, trace low plasticity clay fines.
WEARING COURSE
BASE COURSE
FILLPID = 0.4
PID = 0.2
ALLUVIUM
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.2
St toVSt
L to MD
MD
D
<Wl
<Wp
<Wl
M
M to W
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole1 of 2
BH1a
C-0259.00
07 Nov 2019
07 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
position: E: 703041; N: 6085306 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
26/1
1/20
19 1
9:10
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
SWSPT2, 9, 20N=29
AD
/T
N
Gravelly SAND: fine to coarse grained, brown, fine tomedium, sub-angular gravel, trace low plasticity clayfines.
Borehole BH1a terminated at 9.0 mTarget depth
ALLUVIUMPID = 0.2
PID = 0.1
MDM to W
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole2 of 2
BH1a
C-0259.00
07 Nov 2019
07 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
position: E: 703041; N: 6085306 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
26/1
1/20
19 1
9:10
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
GW
SW-SM
CI-CH
E
E
E
E
Not
Obs
erve
d
HA
AD
/T
N
FILL: ASPHALT: black, (20 mm thickness).
FILL: Sandy GRAVEL: fine to coarse grained,sub-angular, grey, brown, fine to coarse sand, trace lowplasticity silt fines.
FILL: Silty Gravelly SAND: fine to coarse grained,grey, brown, fine to coarse, sub-angular gravel, lowplasticity silt fines, trace anthropogenic material(plastic).
Silty CLAY: medium to high plasticity, red-brown,mottled brown, trace fine sand.
Borehole BH2a terminated at 3.0 mTarget depth
WEARING COURSE
BASE COURSE
FILLPID = 0.7
PID = 0.2
ALLUVIUM
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.2
F to St
D
D to M
<Wp
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole1 of 1
BH2a
C-0259.00
07 Nov 2019
07 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
position: E: 703061; N: 6085318 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
23/1
1/20
19 2
1:42
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
GW
ML
CI-CH
SM
ML
SM
SP
SPT3, 4, 8N=12
SPT3, 7, 8N=15
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
AD
/T
N
FILL: ASPHALT: black, (15 mm thickness).
FILL: Sandy GRAVEL: fine to coarse grained,sub-angular, grey, fine to coarse sand, trace lowplasticity silt fines.
Clayey SILT: low liquid limit, brown, with some finesand.
Silty CLAY: medium to high plasticity, red-brown,trace fine sand.
SILTY SAND: fine to coarse grained, red-brown, lowplasticity silt fines.
Clayey SILT: low liquid limit, red-brown, mottled palebrown, with some fine sand.
SILTY SAND: fine to medium grained, pale brown,low plasticity silt fines.
Gravelly SAND: fine to medium grained, brown, fine,sub-rounded gravel.
WEARING COURSE
BASE COURSE
PID = 0.2
ALLUVIUM
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.2
D to M
<Wl
<Wp
M
<Wl
M
M to W
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole1 of 2
BH3a
C-0259.00
08 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
position: E: 703023; N: 6085334 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
23/1
1/20
19 2
1:42
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
SP
CI
SPT4, 8, 12N=20
SPT5, 6, 11N=17
AD
/T
N
Gravelly SAND: fine to medium grained, brown, fine,sub-rounded gravel. (continued)
Sandy CLAY: medium plasticity, pale brown, fine tocoarse sand.
Borehole BH3a terminated at 10.0 mTarget depth
ALLUVIUMPID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
RESIDUAL SOIL
M to W
<Wp
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole2 of 2
BH3a
C-0259.00
08 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
position: E: 703023; N: 6085334 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
23/1
1/20
19 2
1:42
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
ML
SM
SP-SM
SP
SM
SP
SPT8, 12, 21
N=33
SPT6, 10, 10
N=20
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
AD
/T
N
FILL: Sandy SILT: low liquid limit, brown, fine tocoarse sand.
SILTY SAND: fine to coarse grained, pale brown, finesand, with some fine to medium, sub-rounded gravel.
SAND: fine to medium grained, pale brown, withsome low plasticity silt fines.
SAND: fine to coarse grained, pale brown, trace lowplasticity silt fines.
SILTY SAND: fine to medium grained, pale brown,low plasticity silt fines.
Gravelly SAND: fine to medium grained, brown, fine,sub-angular to sub-rounded gravel.
FILL
PID = 20.9
PID = 0.1
ALLUVIUM
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
L to MD
MD
<Wl
D to M
M
M to W
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole1 of 2
BH4a
C-0259.00
08 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
position: E: 703072; N: 6085339 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
23/1
1/20
19 2
1:42
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
SPSPT6, 12, 18
N=30
SPT6, 15, 20
N=35
AD
/T
N
Gravelly SAND: fine to medium grained, brown, fine,sub-angular to sub-rounded gravel. (continued)
Borehole BH4a terminated at 9.0 mTarget depth
ALLUVIUMPID = 0.1
PID = 0.1
MDM to W
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole2 of 2
BH4a
C-0259.00
08 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
9.0
10.0
11.0
12.0
13.0
14.0
15.0
position: E: 703072; N: 6085339 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
23/1
1/20
19 2
1:42
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
ML
SW
ML
CI-CH
E
E
E
E
Not
Obs
erve
d
HA
AD
/T
N
FILL: Clayey Sandy SILT: low liquid limit, dark brown,fine to medium sand, low plasticity clay fines.
FILL: Gravelly SAND: fine to coarse grained, brown,fine to coarse, sub-angular gravel, trace brick andconcrete fragments.
FILL: Sandy SILT: low liquid limit, dark brown, fine tomedium, sub-angular gravel.
Silty CLAY: medium to high plasticity, red-brown,mottled brown.
Borehole BH5a terminated at 3.0 mTarget depth
TOPSOIL / FILL
FILL
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.1
ALLUVIUM
PID = 0.2
PID = 0.1
F to St
<Wl
D
<Wl
~Wp
RL
(m)
drilling information material substance
Borehole ID.
sheet:
project no.
date started:
date completed:
logged by:
checked by:
client:
principal:
location:
Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council
257 Crawford Street, Queanbeyan NSW
project: New QPRC Headquarters Development
Engineering Log - Borehole1 of 1
BH5a
C-0259.00
08 Nov 2019
08 Nov 2019
LC
DB
grap
hic
log
clas
sific
atio
nsy
mbo
lsamples &field tests
wat
er
samples & field tests consistency / relative densitysupportM mudC casing
N nil
classification symbol &soil description
based on UnifiedClassification System
water
water outflow
water inflow
penetration
no resistanceranging torefusal
10-Oct-12 waterlevel on date shown
method
1 2 3HA hand auger
ADASHAW
auger drilling*auger screwing*hand augerwashbore
*e.g.BTV
bit shown by suffixAD/Tblank bitTC bitV bit
BDESSU##HPNN*NcVSRHB
bulk disturbed sampledisturbed sampleenvironmental samplesplit spoon sampleundisturbed sample ##mm diameterhand penetrometer (kPa)standard penetration test (SPT)SPT - sample recoveredSPT with solid conevane shear; peak/remouded (kPa)refusalhammer bouncing
VSSFStVStHFbVLLMDDVD
very softsoftfirmstiffvery stiffhardfriablevery looseloosemedium densedensevery dense
met
hod
&su
ppor
t SOIL TYPE: plasticity or particle characteristic,colour, secondary and minor components
material description structure andadditional observations
1 2 3pe
netr
atio
n
dept
h (m
)
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
position: E: 703080; N: 6085333 (WGS84 Zone 55)
drill model: Gemco 210B, Trailer mounted
angle from horizontal: 90°
hole diameter : 100 mm
surface elevation: Not Specified
drilling fluid: N/A
cons
iste
ncy
/re
lativ
e de
nsi
ty
moi
stur
eco
nditi
on
D&
N_A
U_L
IBR
AR
Y.G
LB r
ev:A
M
Log
CO
F B
OR
EH
OLE
: N
ON
CO
RE
D
PR
OJ0
259.
GP
J <
<D
raw
ingF
ile>
>
23/1
1/20
19 2
1:42
moistureDMWWpWl
drymoistwetplastic limitliquid limit
(kPa)
100
200
300
400
handpenetro-
meter
Preliminary Soil Contamination Assessment – Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council Headquarters
Ballpark EnvironmentalBPE19094-R01 2 December 2019
Appendix B Laboratory Certificates
Certificate of Analysis
Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd
PO Box 36
Nana Glen
NSW 2450
Attention: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew Ballard & Joel Parkin
Report 687519-S
Project name BPE19094
Project ID BPE19094
Received Date Nov 12, 2019
Client Sample ID BH1 0.5M BH1 2M BH1 7-7.45M BH1 7.5-7.95M
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15398 S19-No15399 S19-No15400 S19-No15401
Date Sampled Nov 07, 2019 Nov 07, 2019 Nov 07, 2019 Nov 07, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 101 93 108 103
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 2.8 3.7 10 3.1
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 18 26 12 8.3
Copper 5 mg/kg 6.6 16 14 5.1
Lead 5 mg/kg 18 14 11 < 5
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 9.2 15 8.5 6.1
Zinc 5 mg/kg 47 36 24 16
% Moisture 1 % 5.4 11 13 13
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 1 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 18217
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.
Client Sample ID BH1 8.5-8.95M BH2 1M BH2 2M BH3 6M
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15402 S19-No15403 S19-No15404 S19-No15405
Date Sampled Nov 07, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 100 < 50 < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 150 < 50 < 50
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 87 94 86 96
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 110 < 100 < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 130 < 100 < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 240 < 100 < 100
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 2.4 3.6 4.3 3.8
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 8.7 18 27 12
Copper 5 mg/kg < 5 9.3 16 8.7
Lead 5 mg/kg < 5 20 16 6.9
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 6.6 9.0 16 8.9
Zinc 5 mg/kg 25 65 65 24
% Moisture 1 % 9.3 6.4 13 4.9
Client Sample ID BH3 7-7.45M BH3 8.5-8.95M BH4 0.5M (A) BH4 0.5M (B)
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15406 S19-No15407 S19-No15408 S19-No15409
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 2 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Client Sample ID BH3 7-7.45M BH3 8.5-8.95M BH4 0.5M (A) BH4 0.5M (B)
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15406 S19-No15407 S19-No15408 S19-No15409
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 91 93 94 97
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 3.7 3.7 5.8 5.0
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 14 10 24 24
Copper 5 mg/kg 10 5.6 13 14
Lead 5 mg/kg 6.0 5.6 27 30
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 12 7.3 14 13
Zinc 5 mg/kg 27 21 64 61
% Moisture 1 % 10 10.0 5.6 12
Client Sample ID BH4 2M BH4 7-7.45M BH4 7.5-7.95M BH4 8-8.45M
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15410 S19-No15411 S19-No15412 S19-No15413
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 97 92 89 92
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 3 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Client Sample ID BH4 2M BH4 7-7.45M BH4 7.5-7.95M BH4 8-8.45M
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15410 S19-No15411 S19-No15412 S19-No15413
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 5.8 3.3 4.0 4.4
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 21 50 13 11
Copper 5 mg/kg 13 8.3 8.9 7.3
Lead 5 mg/kg 18 7.3 6.6 8.1
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 12 19 10 8.6
Zinc 5 mg/kg 52 29 22 23
% Moisture 1 % 11 8.1 5.6 9.2
Client Sample ID BH5 0.5M BH5 3M QC01 QC02
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15414 S19-No15415 S19-No15416 S19-No15417
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 94 92 90 93
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 < 50 < 50 < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 < 100 < 100 < 100
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 4 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Client Sample ID BH5 0.5M BH5 3M QC01 QC02
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15414 S19-No15415 S19-No15416 S19-No15417
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 3.6 5.1 3.1 2.9
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 19 26 22 16
Copper 5 mg/kg 7.5 15 9.5 8.5
Lead 5 mg/kg 22 14 21 24
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1 < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 9.5 17 10.0 8.1
Zinc 5 mg/kg 49 39 65 58
% Moisture 1 % 6.3 9.9 4.6 8.7
Client Sample ID QC03 R20TRIP SPIKE TRIP BLANK
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15418 S19-No15420 S19-No15421
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20 - -
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20 - -
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50 - -
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50 - -
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50 - -
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 110 < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 100 < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 100 < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2 100 < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 100 < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3 100 < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 90 100 94
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 - -
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20 - -
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20 - -
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50 - -
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50 - -
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100 - -
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100 - -
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100 - -
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 5.7 - -
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4 - -
Chromium 5 mg/kg 29 - -
Copper 5 mg/kg 16 - -
Lead 5 mg/kg 15 - -
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1 - -
Nickel 5 mg/kg 21 - -
Zinc 5 mg/kg 43 - -
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 5 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Client Sample ID QC03 R20TRIP SPIKE TRIP BLANK
Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15418 S19-No15420 S19-No15421
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
% Moisture 1 % 9.7 - -
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 6 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results.
If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time
Eurofins | mgt Suite B6
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 16, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
BTEX Sydney Nov 18, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 16, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 16, 2019
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Metals M8 Sydney Nov 16, 2019 180 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
% Moisture Sydney Nov 12, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 7 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
External Laboratory
No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime
Matrix LAB ID
1 BH1 0.5M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15398 X X
2 BH1 2M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15399 X X
3 BH1 7-7.45M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15400 X X
4 BH1 7.5-7.95M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15401 X X
5 BH1 8.5-8.95M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15402 X X
6 BH2 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15403 X X
7 BH2 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15404 X X
8 BH3 6M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15405 X X
9 BH3 7-7.45M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15406 X X
Date Reported:Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 8 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
10 BH3 8.5-8.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15407 X X
11 BH4 0.5M (A) Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15408 X X
12 BH4 0.5M (B) Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15409 X X
13 BH4 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15410 X X
14 BH4 7-7.45M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15411 X X
15 BH4 7.5-7.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15412 X X
16 BH4 8-8.45M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15413 X X
17 BH5 0.5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15414 X X
18 BH5 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15415 X X
19 QC01 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15416 X X
20 QC02 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15417 X X
21 QC03 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15418 X X
Page 9 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
22 WB1 Nov 08, 2019 Water S19-No15419 X
23 TRIP SPIKE Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15420 X
24 TRIP BLANK Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15421 X
25 BH1 1M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15423 X
26 BH1 3M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15424 X
27 BH1 4M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15425 X
28 BH1 5M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15426 X
29 BH1 8-8.45M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15427 X
30 BH2 0.5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15428 X
31 BH2 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15429 X
32 BH3 0.5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15430 X
33 BH3 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15431 X
Page 10 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
34 BH3 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15432 X
35 BH3 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15433 X
36 BH3 4M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15434 X
37 BH3 5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15435 X
38 BH3 7.5-7.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15436 X
39 BH3 8-8.45M(A)
Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15437 X
40 BH3 8-8.45M(B)
Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15438 X
41 BH4 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15439 X
42 BH4 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15440 X
43 BH4 4M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15441 X
44 BH4 5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15442 X
Page 11 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
45 BH4 6M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15443 X
46 BH4 8.5-8.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15444 X
47 BH5 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15445 X
48 BH5 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15446 X
49 QC04 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15447 X
50 BH1 6M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15448 X
51 BH01 Nov 08, 2019 Water S19-No15449 X
52 BH3 7M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15628 X
53 BH3 10M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15629 X
Test Counts 28 2 21 21 23 23
Page 12 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General
Holding Times
Units
Terms
QC - Acceptance Criteria
QC Data General Comments
1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site
Contamination) Measure 1999, as amended May 2013 and are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request.
2. All soil/sediment/solid results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.
3. All biota/food results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.
4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.
5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.
6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.
7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.
8. Information identified on this report with blue colour, indicates data provided by customer, that may have an impact on the results.
9. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).
For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the SRA.
If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.
Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.
For VOCs containing vinyl chloride, styrene and 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether the holding time is 7 days however for all other VOCs such as BTEX or C6-10 TRH then the holding time is 14 days.
**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre ug/L: micrograms per litre
ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage
org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.
LOR Limit of Reporting.
SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.
LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.
CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.
Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.
Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.
Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
APHA American Public Health Association
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
COC Chain of Custody
SRA Sample Receipt Advice
QSM US Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual Version 5.3
CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report
NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.
TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:
Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit
Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%
Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%
Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 20-130% Phenols & 50-150% PFASs
PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.3 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was
affected.
WA DWER (n=10): PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFBS, PFHxS, PFOS, 6:2 FTSA, 8:2 FTSA
1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within
the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.
2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent
and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.
3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.
4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.
5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported
in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.
6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.
Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.
7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.
8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.
9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.
10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 13 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Quality Control Results
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
Method Blank
BTEX
Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass
o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass
TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass
Method Blank
Heavy Metals
Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass
Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass
Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 % 81 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 % 72 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
BTEX
Benzene % 81 70-130 Pass
Toluene % 79 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene % 79 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes % 82 70-130 Pass
o-Xylene % 79 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total % 81 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene % 79 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 % 78 70-130 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 % 72 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Heavy Metals
Arsenic % 103 70-130 Pass
Cadmium % 105 70-130 Pass
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 14 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Chromium % 106 70-130 Pass
Copper % 108 70-130 Pass
Lead % 101 70-130 Pass
Mercury % 92 70-130 Pass
Nickel % 108 70-130 Pass
Zinc % 104 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH C6-C9 S19-No15401 CP % 88 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
BTEX Result 1
Benzene S19-No15401 CP % 90 70-130 Pass
Toluene S19-No15401 CP % 90 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene S19-No15401 CP % 87 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes S19-No15401 CP % 87 70-130 Pass
o-Xylene S19-No15401 CP % 86 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total S19-No15401 CP % 87 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1
Naphthalene S19-No15401 CP % 97 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 S19-No15401 CP % 84 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH C10-C14 S19-No15408 CP % 76 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH >C10-C16 S19-No15408 CP % 74 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Heavy Metals Result 1
Arsenic S19-No15416 CP % 99 70-130 Pass
Cadmium S19-No15416 CP % 99 70-130 Pass
Chromium S19-No15416 CP % 90 70-130 Pass
Copper S19-No15416 CP % 92 70-130 Pass
Lead S19-No15416 CP % 119 70-130 Pass
Mercury S19-No15416 CP % 114 70-130 Pass
Nickel S19-No15416 CP % 93 70-130 Pass
Zinc S19-No15416 CP % 89 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C6-C9 S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Benzene S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Toluene S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Ethylbenzene S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
m&p-Xylenes S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
o-Xylene S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Xylenes - Total S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Naphthalene S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
TRH C6-C10 S19-No15400 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 15 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C6-C9 S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Benzene S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Toluene S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Ethylbenzene S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
m&p-Xylenes S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
o-Xylene S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Xylenes - Total S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Naphthalene S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
TRH C6-C10 S19-No15410 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Arsenic S19-No15415 CP mg/kg 5.1 5.4 6.0 30% Pass
Cadmium S19-No15415 CP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass
Chromium S19-No15415 CP mg/kg 26 29 10 30% Pass
Copper S19-No15415 CP mg/kg 15 16 9.0 30% Pass
Lead S19-No15415 CP mg/kg 14 15 6.0 30% Pass
Mercury S19-No15415 CP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Nickel S19-No15415 CP mg/kg 17 20 14 30% Pass
Zinc S19-No15415 CP mg/kg 39 45 13 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
% Moisture S19-No15417 CP % 8.7 8.7 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C10-C14 S19-No15418 CP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH C15-C28 S19-No15418 CP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
TRH C29-C36 S19-No15418 CP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH >C10-C16 S19-No15418 CP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C16-C34 S19-No15418 CP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C34-C40 S19-No15418 CP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 16 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Comments
Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A
Attempt to Chill was evident Yes
Sample correctly preserved Yes
Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes
Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes
Samples received within HoldingTime Yes
Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments
Code Description
N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).
N02
Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.
N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.
R20 This sample is a Trip Spike and therefore all results are reported as a percentage
Authorised By
Ursula Long Analytical Services Manager
Andrew Sullivan Senior Analyst-Organic (NSW)
Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)
Gabriele Cordero Senior Analyst-Metal (NSW)
Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)
Joseph Edouard Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)
Glenn Jackson
General Manager
- Indicates Not Requested
* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service
Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lostprofits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 17 of 17
Report Number: 687519-S
Certificate of Analysis
Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd
PO Box 36
Nana Glen
NSW 2450
Attention: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew Ballard & Joel Parkin
Report 687519-W
Project name BPE19094
Project ID BPE19094
Received Date Nov 12, 2019
Client Sample ID WB1 BH01
Sample Matrix Water Water
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15419 S19-No15449
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019 Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 0.02 mg/L < 0.02 0.23
TRH C10-C14 0.05 mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05
TRH C15-C28 0.1 mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1
TRH C29-C36 0.1 mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 0.1 mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1
BTEX
Benzene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001
Toluene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 0.006
Ethylbenzene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001
m&p-Xylenes 0.002 mg/L < 0.002 < 0.002
o-Xylene 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001
Xylenes - Total 0.003 mg/L < 0.003 < 0.003
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 113 98
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.01 mg/L < 0.01 < 0.01
TRH C6-C10 0.02 mg/L < 0.02 0.26
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 0.02 mg/L < 0.02 0.25
TRH >C10-C16 0.05 mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 0.05 mg/L < 0.05 < 0.05
TRH >C16-C34 0.1 mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1
TRH >C34-C40 0.1 mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 0.1 mg/L < 0.1 < 0.1
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001
Cadmium 0.0002 mg/L < 0.0002 < 0.0002
Chromium 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001
Copper 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 0.002
Lead 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001
Mercury 0.0001 mg/L < 0.0001 < 0.0001
Nickel 0.001 mg/L < 0.001 0.003
Zinc 0.005 mg/L < 0.005 0.007
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 1 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 18217
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.
Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results.
If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time
Eurofins | mgt Suite B6
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 13, 2019 7 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
BTEX Sydney Nov 13, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 13, 2019 7 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Sydney Nov 13, 2019
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Metals M8 Sydney Nov 13, 2019 180 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 2 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
External Laboratory
No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime
Matrix LAB ID
1 BH1 0.5M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15398 X X
2 BH1 2M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15399 X X
3 BH1 7-7.45M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15400 X X
4 BH1 7.5-7.95M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15401 X X
5 BH1 8.5-8.95M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15402 X X
6 BH2 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15403 X X
7 BH2 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15404 X X
8 BH3 6M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15405 X X
9 BH3 7-7.45M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15406 X X
Date Reported:Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 3 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
10 BH3 8.5-8.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15407 X X
11 BH4 0.5M (A) Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15408 X X
12 BH4 0.5M (B) Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15409 X X
13 BH4 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15410 X X
14 BH4 7-7.45M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15411 X X
15 BH4 7.5-7.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15412 X X
16 BH4 8-8.45M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15413 X X
17 BH5 0.5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15414 X X
18 BH5 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15415 X X
19 QC01 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15416 X X
20 QC02 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15417 X X
21 QC03 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15418 X X
Page 4 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
22 WB1 Nov 08, 2019 Water S19-No15419 X
23 TRIP SPIKE Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15420 X
24 TRIP BLANK Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15421 X
25 BH1 1M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15423 X
26 BH1 3M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15424 X
27 BH1 4M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15425 X
28 BH1 5M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15426 X
29 BH1 8-8.45M Nov 07, 2019 Soil S19-No15427 X
30 BH2 0.5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15428 X
31 BH2 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15429 X
32 BH3 0.5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15430 X
33 BH3 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15431 X
Page 5 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
34 BH3 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15432 X
35 BH3 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15433 X
36 BH3 4M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15434 X
37 BH3 5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15435 X
38 BH3 7.5-7.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15436 X
39 BH3 8-8.45M(A)
Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15437 X
40 BH3 8-8.45M(B)
Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15438 X
41 BH4 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15439 X
42 BH4 3M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15440 X
43 BH4 4M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15441 X
44 BH4 5M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15442 X
Page 6 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 687519 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
HO
LD
BT
EX
Moisture S
et
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217 X X X X X X
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
45 BH4 6M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15443 X
46 BH4 8.5-8.95M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15444 X
47 BH5 1M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15445 X
48 BH5 2M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15446 X
49 QC04 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15447 X
50 BH1 6M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15448 X
51 BH01 Nov 08, 2019 Water S19-No15449 X
52 BH3 7M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15628 X
53 BH3 10M Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15629 X
Test Counts 28 2 21 21 23 23
Page 7 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General
Holding Times
Units
Terms
QC - Acceptance Criteria
QC Data General Comments
1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site
Contamination) Measure 1999, as amended May 2013 and are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request.
2. All soil/sediment/solid results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.
3. All biota/food results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.
4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.
5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.
6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.
7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.
8. Information identified on this report with blue colour, indicates data provided by customer, that may have an impact on the results.
9. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).
For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the SRA.
If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.
Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.
For VOCs containing vinyl chloride, styrene and 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether the holding time is 7 days however for all other VOCs such as BTEX or C6-10 TRH then the holding time is 14 days.
**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre ug/L: micrograms per litre
ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage
org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.
LOR Limit of Reporting.
SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.
LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.
CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.
Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.
Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.
Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
APHA American Public Health Association
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
COC Chain of Custody
SRA Sample Receipt Advice
QSM US Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual Version 5.3
CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report
NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.
TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:
Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit
Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%
Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%
Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 20-130% Phenols & 50-150% PFASs
PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.3 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was
affected.
WA DWER (n=10): PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFBS, PFHxS, PFOS, 6:2 FTSA, 8:2 FTSA
1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within
the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.
2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent
and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.
3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.
4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.
5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported
in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.
6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.
Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.
7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.
8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.
9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.
10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 8 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
Quality Control Results
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 mg/L < 0.02 0.02 Pass
TRH C10-C14 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass
TRH C15-C28 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
TRH C29-C36 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Method Blank
BTEX
Benzene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Toluene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Ethylbenzene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
m&p-Xylenes mg/L < 0.002 0.002 Pass
o-Xylene mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Xylenes - Total mg/L < 0.003 0.003 Pass
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene mg/L < 0.01 0.01 Pass
TRH C6-C10 mg/L < 0.02 0.02 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 mg/L < 0.05 0.05 Pass
TRH >C16-C34 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
TRH >C34-C40 mg/L < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Method Blank
Heavy Metals
Arsenic mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Cadmium mg/L < 0.0002 0.0002 Pass
Chromium mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Copper mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Lead mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Mercury mg/L < 0.0001 0.0001 Pass
Nickel mg/L < 0.001 0.001 Pass
Zinc mg/L < 0.005 0.005 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 % 80 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 % 74 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
BTEX
Benzene % 81 70-130 Pass
Toluene % 84 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene % 87 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes % 82 70-130 Pass
o-Xylene % 85 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total % 83 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene % 127 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 % 83 70-130 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 % 75 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Heavy Metals
Arsenic % 101 70-130 Pass
Cadmium % 101 70-130 Pass
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 9 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Chromium % 100 70-130 Pass
Copper % 97 70-130 Pass
Lead % 101 70-130 Pass
Mercury % 111 70-130 Pass
Nickel % 99 70-130 Pass
Zinc % 96 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH C6-C9 S19-No18125 NCP % 84 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
BTEX Result 1
Benzene S19-No18125 NCP % 75 70-130 Pass
Toluene S19-No18125 NCP % 85 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene S19-No18125 NCP % 92 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes S19-No18125 NCP % 90 70-130 Pass
o-Xylene S19-No18125 NCP % 87 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total S19-No18125 NCP % 89 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1
Naphthalene S19-No18125 NCP % 125 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 S19-No18125 NCP % 87 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Heavy Metals Result 1
Arsenic S19-No15419 CP % 97 70-130 Pass
Cadmium S19-No15419 CP % 97 70-130 Pass
Chromium S19-No15419 CP % 100 70-130 Pass
Copper S19-No15419 CP % 97 70-130 Pass
Lead S19-No15419 CP % 101 70-130 Pass
Mercury S19-No15419 CP % 109 70-130 Pass
Nickel S19-No15419 CP % 99 70-130 Pass
Zinc S19-No15419 CP % 95 70-130 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C6-C9 S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.02 < 0.02 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Benzene S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Toluene S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Ethylbenzene S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
m&p-Xylenes S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.002 < 0.002 <1 30% Pass
o-Xylene S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Xylenes - Total S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.003 < 0.003 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Naphthalene S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.01 < 0.01 <1 30% Pass
TRH C6-C10 S19-No19531 NCP mg/L < 0.02 < 0.02 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 10 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
Duplicate
Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Arsenic S19-No15449 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Cadmium S19-No15449 CP mg/L < 0.0002 < 0.0002 <1 30% Pass
Chromium S19-No15449 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Copper S19-No15449 CP mg/L 0.002 0.002 3.0 30% Pass
Lead S19-No15449 CP mg/L < 0.001 < 0.001 <1 30% Pass
Mercury S19-No15449 CP mg/L < 0.0001 < 0.0001 <1 30% Pass
Nickel S19-No15449 CP mg/L 0.003 0.003 2.0 30% Pass
Zinc S19-No15449 CP mg/L 0.007 0.009 16 30% Pass
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 11 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
Comments
Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A
Attempt to Chill was evident Yes
Sample correctly preserved Yes
Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes
Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes
Samples received within HoldingTime Yes
Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments
Code Description
N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).
N02
Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.
N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.
Authorised By
Ursula Long Analytical Services Manager
Andrew Sullivan Senior Analyst-Organic (NSW)
Gabriele Cordero Senior Analyst-Metal (NSW)
Glenn Jackson
General Manager
- Indicates Not Requested
* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service
Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lostprofits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Date Reported: Nov 19, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 12 of 12
Report Number: 687519-W
Certificate of Analysis
Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd
PO Box 36
Nana Glen
NSW 2450
Attention: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew Ballard & Joel Parkin
Report 689412-S
Project name BPE19094
Project ID BPE19094
Received Date Nov 12, 2019
Client Sample ID QC02
Sample Matrix Soil
Eurofins Sample No. S19-No15417
Date Sampled Nov 08, 2019
Test/Reference LOR Unit
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 20 mg/kg < 20
TRH C10-C14 20 mg/kg < 20
TRH C15-C28 50 mg/kg < 50
TRH C29-C36 50 mg/kg < 50
TRH C10-C36 (Total) 50 mg/kg < 50
BTEX
Benzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1
Toluene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1
Ethylbenzene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1
m&p-Xylenes 0.2 mg/kg < 0.2
o-Xylene 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1
Xylenes - Total 0.3 mg/kg < 0.3
4-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 93
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
NaphthaleneN02 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5
TRH C6-C10 20 mg/kg < 20
TRH C6-C10 less BTEX (F1)N04 20 mg/kg < 20
TRH >C10-C16 50 mg/kg < 50
TRH >C10-C16 less Naphthalene (F2)N01 50 mg/kg < 50
TRH >C16-C34 100 mg/kg < 100
TRH >C34-C40 100 mg/kg < 100
TRH >C10-C40 (total)* 100 mg/kg < 100
Heavy Metals
Arsenic 2 mg/kg 2.9
Cadmium 0.4 mg/kg < 0.4
Chromium 5 mg/kg 16
Copper 5 mg/kg 8.5
Lead 5 mg/kg 24
Mercury 0.1 mg/kg < 0.1
Nickel 5 mg/kg 8.1
Zinc 5 mg/kg 58
% Moisture 1 % 8.7
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 1 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
NATA AccreditedAccreditation Number 1261Site Number 18217
Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 – TestingThe results of the tests, calibrations and/ormeasurements included in this document are traceableto Australian/national standards.
Sample HistoryWhere samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.A recent review of our LIMS has resulted in the correction or clarification of some method identifications. Due to this, some of the method reference information on reports has changed. However,no substantive change has been made to our laboratory methods, and as such there is no change in the validity of current or previous results.
If the date and time of sampling are not provided, the Laboratory will not be responsible for compromised results should testing be performed outside the recommended holding time.
Description Testing Site Extracted Holding Time
Eurofins | mgt Suite B6
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Nov 14, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
BTEX Melbourne Nov 14, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Nov 14, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Melbourne Nov 14, 2019
- Method: LTM-ORG-2010 TRH C6-C40
Metals M8 Melbourne Nov 14, 2019 180 Days
- Method: LTM-MET-3040 Metals in Waters, Soils & Sediments by ICP-MS
% Moisture Melbourne Nov 12, 2019 14 Days
- Method: LTM-GEN-7080 Moisture
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 2 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
V2
ABN – 50 005 085 521e.mail : [email protected] : www.eurofins.com.au
Melbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South VIC 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
Brisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
Perth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261Site # 23736
Company Name: Ballpark Environmental Pty Ltd Order No.: Received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMAddress: PO Box 36 Report #: 689412 Due: Nov 19, 2019
Nana Glen Phone: 0400 566 088 Priority: 5 DayNSW 2450 Fax: Contact Name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew
Project Name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094
Eurofins Analytical Services Manager : Ursula Long
Sample Detail
Moisture S
et
Eurofins | m
gt Suite B
6
Melbourne Laboratory - NATA Site # 1254 & 14271 X X
Sydney Laboratory - NATA Site # 18217
Brisbane Laboratory - NATA Site # 20794
Perth Laboratory - NATA Site # 23736
External Laboratory
No Sample ID Sample Date SamplingTime
Matrix LAB ID
1 QC02 Nov 08, 2019 Soil S19-No15417 X X
Test Counts 1 1
Date Reported:Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 3 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
Internal Quality Control Review and Glossary
General
Holding Times
Units
Terms
QC - Acceptance Criteria
QC Data General Comments
1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples follows guidelines delineated in the National Environment Protection (Assessment of Site
Contamination) Measure 1999, as amended May 2013 and are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request.
2. All soil/sediment/solid results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.
3. All biota/food results are reported on a wet weight basis on the edible portion, unless otherwise stated.
4. Actual LORs are matrix dependant. Quoted LORs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.
5. Results are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries except for PFAS compounds.
6. SVOC analysis on waters are performed on homogenised, unfiltered samples, unless noted otherwise.
7. Samples were analysed on an 'as received' basis.
8. Information identified on this report with blue colour, indicates data provided by customer, that may have an impact on the results.
9. This report replaces any interim results previously issued.
Please refer to 'Sample Preservation and Container Guide' for holding times (QS3001).
For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least 6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the SRA.
If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues, suitably qualified results may still be reported.
Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these may be outside the laboratory's control.
For VOCs containing vinyl chloride, styrene and 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether the holding time is 7 days however for all other VOCs such as BTEX or C6-10 TRH then the holding time is 14 days.
**NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as RPD
mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram mg/L: milligrams per litre ug/L: micrograms per litre
ppm: Parts per million ppb: Parts per billion %: Percentage
org/100mL: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Nephelometric Turbidity Units MPN/100mL: Most Probable Number of organisms per 100 millilitres
Dry Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.
LOR Limit of Reporting.
SPIKE Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.
RPD Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.
LCS Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.
CRM Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.
Method Blank In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands and in the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.
Surr - Surrogate The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.
Duplicate A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
APHA American Public Health Association
TCLP Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
COC Chain of Custody
SRA Sample Receipt Advice
QSM US Department of Defense Quality Systems Manual Version 5.3
CP Client Parent - QC was performed on samples pertaining to this report
NCP Non-Client Parent - QC performed on samples not pertaining to this report, QC is representative of the sequence or batch that client samples were analysed within.
TEQ Toxic Equivalency Quotient
RPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable:
Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit
Results between 10-20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%
Results >20 times the LOR : RPD must lie between 0-30%
Surrogate Recoveries: Recoveries must lie between 20-130% Phenols & 50-150% PFASs
PFAS field samples that contain surrogate recoveries in excess of the QC limit designated in QSM 5.3 where no positive PFAS results have been reported have been reviewed and no data was
affected.
WA DWER (n=10): PFBA, PFPeA, PFHxA, PFHpA, PFOA, PFBS, PFHxS, PFOS, 6:2 FTSA, 8:2 FTSA
1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR, this is due to either matrix interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within
the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.
2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch at a 1:10 ratio. The Parent
and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.
3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.
4. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.
5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported
in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.
6. pH and Free Chlorine analysed in the laboratory - Analysis on this test must begin within 30 minutes of sampling.Therefore laboratory analysis is unlikely to be completed within holding time.
Analysis will begin as soon as possible after sample receipt.
7. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.
8. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Aroclor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS.
9. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.
10. Duplicate RPDs are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two sets of data.
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 4 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
Quality Control Results
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH C10-C14 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH C15-C28 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
TRH C29-C36 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
Method Blank
BTEX
Benzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Toluene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
m&p-Xylenes mg/kg < 0.2 0.2 Pass
o-Xylene mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Xylenes - Total mg/kg < 0.3 0.3 Pass
Method Blank
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass
TRH C6-C10 mg/kg < 20 20 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 mg/kg < 50 50 Pass
TRH >C16-C34 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass
TRH >C34-C40 mg/kg < 100 100 Pass
Method Blank
Heavy Metals
Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass
Cadmium mg/kg < 0.4 0.4 Pass
Chromium mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Copper mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Lead mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Mercury mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass
Nickel mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
Zinc mg/kg < 5 5 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions
TRH C6-C9 % 111 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 % 77 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
BTEX
Benzene % 118 70-130 Pass
Toluene % 119 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene % 120 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes % 116 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total % 118 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions
Naphthalene % 110 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 % 112 70-130 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 % 73 70-130 Pass
LCS - % Recovery
Heavy Metals
Arsenic % 105 80-120 Pass
Cadmium % 102 80-120 Pass
Chromium % 108 80-120 Pass
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 5 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
Test Units Result 1 AcceptanceLimits
PassLimits
QualifyingCode
Copper % 109 80-120 Pass
Lead % 107 80-120 Pass
Mercury % 98 75-125 Pass
Nickel % 104 80-120 Pass
Zinc % 106 80-120 Pass
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1
TRH C6-C9 M19-No17505 NCP % 99 70-130 Pass
TRH C10-C14 M19-No18204 NCP % 77 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
BTEX Result 1
Benzene M19-No17505 NCP % 98 70-130 Pass
Toluene M19-No17505 NCP % 101 70-130 Pass
Ethylbenzene M19-No17505 NCP % 106 70-130 Pass
m&p-Xylenes M19-No17505 NCP % 102 70-130 Pass
o-Xylene M19-No17505 NCP % 107 70-130 Pass
Xylenes - Total M19-No17505 NCP % 104 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1
Naphthalene M19-No17505 NCP % 95 70-130 Pass
TRH C6-C10 M19-No17505 NCP % 100 70-130 Pass
TRH >C10-C16 M19-No18204 NCP % 73 70-130 Pass
Spike - % Recovery
Heavy Metals Result 1
Arsenic N19-No15284 NCP % 103 75-125 Pass
Cadmium N19-No15284 NCP % 103 75-125 Pass
Chromium N19-No15284 NCP % 108 75-125 Pass
Copper N19-No15284 NCP % 107 75-125 Pass
Lead N19-No15284 NCP % 102 75-125 Pass
Mercury N19-No15284 NCP % 97 70-130 Pass
Nickel N19-No15284 NCP % 102 75-125 Pass
Zinc N19-No15284 NCP % 38 75-125 Fail Q08
Test Lab Sample ID QASource Units Result 1 Acceptance
LimitsPass
LimitsQualifying
Code
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 1999 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
TRH C6-C9 M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH C10-C14 M19-No19469 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH C15-C28 M19-No19469 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
TRH C29-C36 M19-No19469 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Benzene M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Toluene M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Ethylbenzene M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
m&p-Xylenes M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.2 < 0.2 <1 30% Pass
o-Xylene M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Xylenes - Total M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.3 < 0.3 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 6 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
Duplicate
Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - 2013 NEPM Fractions Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Naphthalene M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass
TRH C6-C10 M19-No17523 NCP mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C10-C16 M19-No19469 NCP mg/kg < 50 < 50 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C16-C34 M19-No19469 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass
TRH >C34-C40 M19-No19469 NCP mg/kg < 100 < 100 <1 30% Pass
Duplicate
Heavy Metals Result 1 Result 2 RPD
Arsenic M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg 2.2 < 2 9.0 30% Pass
Cadmium M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg < 0.4 < 0.4 <1 30% Pass
Chromium M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg 7.1 5.9 18 30% Pass
Copper M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg 6.0 5.8 3.0 30% Pass
Lead M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg 9.8 8.6 13 30% Pass
Mercury M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass
Nickel M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg 10 9.4 8.0 30% Pass
Zinc M19-No16946 NCP mg/kg 23 22 4.0 30% Pass
Duplicate
Result 1 Result 2 RPD
% Moisture S19-No15417 CP % 8.7 8.7 <1 30% Pass
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 7 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
Comments
Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/A
Attempt to Chill was evident Yes
Sample correctly preserved Yes
Appropriate sample containers have been used Yes
Sample containers for volatile analysis received with minimal headspace Yes
Samples received within HoldingTime Yes
Some samples have been subcontracted No
Qualifier Codes/Comments
Code Description
N01F2 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "naphthalene" value from the ">C10-C16" value. The naphthalene value used in this calculation is obtained from volatiles(Purge & Trap analysis).
N02
Where we have reported both volatile (P&T GCMS) and semivolatile (GCMS) naphthalene data, results may not be identical. Provided correct sample handling protocols havebeen followed, any observed differences in results are likely to be due to procedural differences within each methodology. Results determined by both techniques have passedall QAQC acceptance criteria, and are entirely technically valid.
N04F1 is determined by arithmetically subtracting the "Total BTEX" value from the "C6-C10" value. The "Total BTEX" value is obtained by summing the concentrations of BTEXanalytes. The "C6-C10" value is obtained by quantitating against a standard of mixed aromatic/aliphatic analytes.
Q08The matrix spike recovery is outside of the recommended acceptance criteria. An acceptable recovery was obtained for the laboratory control sample indicating a sample matrixinterference.
Authorised By
Ursula Long Analytical Services Manager
Emily Rosenberg Senior Analyst-Metal (VIC)
Harry Bacalis Senior Analyst-Volatile (VIC)
Joseph Edouard Senior Analyst-Organic (VIC)
Glenn Jackson
General Manager
- Indicates Not Requested
* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this service
Measurement uncertainty of test data is available on request or please click here.Eurofins shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall Eurofins be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lostprofits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.
Date Reported: Nov 21, 2019
Eurofins Environment Testing Unit F3, Building F, 16 Mars Road, Lane Cove West, NSW, Australia, 2066
ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 2 9900 8400
Page 8 of 8
Report Number: 689412-S
ABN – 50 005 085 521 e.mail : [email protected] web : www.eurofins.com.au
MelbourneMelbourneMelbourneMelbourne6 Monterey RoadDandenong South Vic 3175Phone : +61 3 8564 5000NATA # 1261Site # 1254 & 14271
SydneySydneySydneySydneyUnit F3, Building F16 Mars RoadLane Cove West NSW 2066Phone : +61 2 9900 8400NATA # 1261 Site # 18217
BrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbaneBrisbane1/21 Smallwood PlaceMurarrie QLD 4172Phone : +61 7 3902 4600NATA # 1261 Site # 20794
PerthPerthPerthPerth2/91 Leach HighwayKewdale WA 6105Phone : +61 8 9251 9600NATA # 1261 Site # 23736
Global Leader - Results you can trust
Sample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt AdviceSample Receipt Advice
Company name: Ballpark Environmental Pty LtdBallpark Environmental Pty LtdBallpark Environmental Pty LtdBallpark Environmental Pty Ltd
Contact name: -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew Ballard & Joel ParkinProject name: BPE19094Project ID: BPE19094COC number: Not providedTurn around time: 5 DayDate/Time received: Nov 12, 2019 6:21 AMEurofins reference: 687519687519687519687519
Sample informationSample informationSample informationSample information
☑ A detailed list of analytes logged into our LIMS, is included in the attached summary table.
☑ All samples have been received as described on the above COC.
☑ COC has been completed correctly.
☑ Attempt to chill was evident.
☑ Appropriately preserved sample containers have been used.
☑ All samples were received in good condition.
☑ Samples have been provided with adequate time to commence analysis in accordance with therelevant holding times.
☑ Appropriate sample containers have been used.
☑ Sample containers for volatile analysis received with zero headspace.
☒ Split sample sent to requested external lab.
☒ Some samples have been subcontracted.
N/A Custody Seals intact (if used).
NotesNotesNotesNotes
QC02 forwarded to Eurofins Melbourne. Two sets of jars and bags labeled BH4 0.5m and BH3 8-8.45m received,logged as (A) and (B). BH1 6m, BH3 7m and BH310m (1 jar & 1 bag each) received extra and placed on hold.
Contact notesContact notesContact notesContact notes
If you have any questions with respect to these samples please contact:
Ursula Long on Phone : or by e.mail: [email protected]
Results will be delivered electronically via e.mail to -ALL SRAs & Results - Andrew Ballard & Joel Parkin [email protected].