preliminary results after cataract surgery with the aspheric acrysof restor iol to correct...
DESCRIPTION
AcrySof Aspheric IOL Design Posterior Aspheric Optic Symmetric Biconvex 6.0 mm Anterior Aspheric Optic Anterior Apodized Diffractive Optic Symmetric Biconvex 6.0 mm SN6AD3* SN60WF* The ReSTOR Aspheric IOL (SN6AD3) is designed with negative spherical aberrationTRANSCRIPT
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia
Meeting of the ASCRSChicago
8-10 February 2007
R.M.M.A. Nuijts1, N.E. De Vries, and J. De Brabander
University Hospital Maastricht The Netherlands
1Author receives travel expenses from ALCON
AcrySof® ReSTOR™
Model SN60D3• Apodized diffractive
structure 3.6 mm center• Refractive in periphery• Incorporates +4.0 add at
lens plane equaling +3.2 at spectacle plane
1.3 micronstep
larger steps: more light to near at centersmaller steps: more light to distance at edge
AcrySof Aspheric IOL Design
PosteriorAspheric Optic
Symmetric Biconvex
6.0 mm
Anterior Aspheric Optic
AnteriorApodizedDiffractiveOptic
Symmetric Biconvex
6.0 mm
SN6AD3* SN60WF*
The ReSTOR Aspheric IOL (SN6AD3) is designed with negative spherical aberration
Patients and Methods
• Prospective study aspheric ReSTOR– 15 patients, 30 eyes with cataract– Bilateral implantation within 2 weeks– 8-14 weeks follow-up– Mean age: 67 ± 8.0 years (range 52-81)
• Comparison with historical standard ReSTOR (SN60D3) group
Outcome Measures
• Patients were examined monocularly and binocularly
• ETDRS visual acuity charts• logMAR visual acuity transferred to
Snellen UCDVA and BCDVA• Near visual acuity transformed into
Snellen values• Contrast sensitivity CSV-1000
Refractive OutcomeComparative data
StandardReSTOR (%)
AsphericReSTOR (%)
Number of eyes 65 30
Mean SE (D) 0.06 ± 0.28 0.14 ± 0.49
SE ± 1.0 D (%) 100 100
Mean Refractive Astigmatism (D) -0.78 ± 0.62 -0.86 ± 0.60
Uncorrected Distance VA Aspheric vs Standard ReSTOR
0.5
0.63
0.8
1.0
-0,1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
Mea
n Lo
gMA
R V
A
Aspheric ReSTOR Standard ReSTOR
monocular binocular 1.25
0.79
0.89
0.68
0.85
Monocular Near VAStandard vs Aspheric ReSTOR
0,870,831,010,96
00,20,40,60,8
11,2
UCNVA DCNVA
Standard ReSTOR Aspheric ReSTOR
Aspheric vs. Standard ReSTOR IOL
Monocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity
0
0,3
0,6
0,9
1,2
1,5
1,8
2,1
3 cpd 6 cpd 12 cpd 18 cpd
Mea
n C
ontra
st S
ensi
tivity
(log
units
+/-
SD)
Standard ReSTOR
Aspheric ReSTOR
Largest difference = 0.29 log units
Clinical Significance 0.3 log units at 2 or more Spatial Frequencies
P=0.001
Vector Vision CSV-1000
P=0.04
Use of SpectaclesAspheric ReSTOR IOL
• Reading glasses: 0/15
• Distance glasses: 0/15– 3/30 eyes scheduled for LASEK
• Computer glasses: 2/15
Adverse Effects
• 3/30 eyes scheduled for YAG capsulotomy
• 3/30 eyes scheduled for LASEK• 1/30 re-operated for decentration• 1/30 IOL exchange for postoperative
ametropia• No disturbing glare or halo’s
Conclusions
• Preliminary data of the aspheric ReSTOR IOL (SN6AD3):– Provides excellent near and distant VA– Mean monocular UCNVA: 0.96– No glasses for near or distant vision
• 2/15 patients computer glasses– No disturbing glare or halos– Higher contrast sensitivity as compared to
standard ReSTOR