poverty & people with intellectual disabilities eric emerson institute for health research...

38
Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University [email protected]

Upload: colleen-grant

Post on 16-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities

Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research

Lancaster University

[email protected]

Page 2: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

The Plan

What is poverty? Why should we be concerned about poverty

and people with intellectual disabilities? What are the implications for research, policy

& practice?

Page 3: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

The Plan

What is poverty? Why should we be concerned about poverty

and people with intellectual disabilities? What are the implications for research, policy

& practice?

Page 4: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Absolute Poverty

‘A condition characterised by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information’

UN World Summit for Social Development, Copenhagen 1995

Page 5: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Moderate & Severe Stunting(Under 5s)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

AfghanistanYemen

EthiopiaNepal

MadagascarIndia

AngolaCambodia

BangladeshNiger

MaliPakistan

Page 6: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Relative Poverty

‘The inability, due to lack of resources, to participate in society and to enjoy a standard of living consistent with human dignity and social decency’

Page 7: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Child Poverty & Per Capita Gross National Income in Rich Countries

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

US

A

Ita

ly

Ire

lan

d

UK

Ca

na

da

Au

stra

lia

Jap

an

Sp

ain

Ge

rma

ny

Ne

the

rla

nd

s

Fra

nce

Sw

ed

en

No

rwa

y

Fin

lan

d

De

nm

ark

$0

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000Child Poverty

GNI (PC)

Page 8: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Rise & Fall in Child Poverty: UK 1978-2005

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04

% c

hild

ren

Poverty Defined: Living in household with less than 60% national median household income (after housing costs)

Page 9: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Poverty …

‘Fundamentally, poverty is a denial of choices and opportunities, a violation of human dignity. It means lack of basic capacity to participate effectively in society.’

- UN Economic & Social Council (1998)

Page 10: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

The Plan

What is poverty? Why should we be concerned about poverty

and people with intellectual disabilities? What are the implications for research, policy

& practice?

Page 11: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

In General …

Poverty is related to Mortality General health Mental health Educational attainment Life experiences and

opportunities

http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/

Page 12: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

150 Years Ago …..

0

10

20

30

40

50

Liverpool Manchester Leedsaver

age

age

at d

eath

183

8-18

41

LabourersFarmers & TradesmenGentry & Professionals

Page 13: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

And Now …….Male Life Expectancy by Occupational Status

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

1972-76 1997-01

V

IV

IIIm

IIInm

II

I

England & Wales 1972-876 & 1997-2001

Social Class

Page 14: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Equivalised Household Income & Child Mental Health in Britain 1999 & 2004

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 2 3 4 5

Equivalised Income Quintile

OR

Conduct DisorderEmotional DisorderAnxiety DisorderDepressionSpecific PhobiaOCDADHDPTSD

Page 15: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

What Processes Mediate & Moderate the Link Between SEP and Health?

Health StatusSEP

Accumulated Risk of Exposure

Across the Lifecourse

Physical Hazards(cold/damp housing,

pollution, toxins, poor nutrition)

Psychosocial Hazards

(low status & control, uncertainty,‘life events’)

Page 16: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Poverty and Risk of Exposure to Housing Hazards

1 2 3 4

overcrowding

cold

rising damp

mice/rats

condensation

water getting in

mould

Odds ratios >

Page 17: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Poverty and Risk of Exposure to Potentially Adverse Life Events

1 2 3 4

Parental separation

Parental trouble with police

Bad fire

Saw severe domestic violence

Sexual abuse

Saw relative assaulted

Parent or sibling died

Serious assault

Child’s close friend died

Witnessed sudden death

Serious accident

Odds ratios >

Page 18: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

What Processes Mediate & Moderate the Link Between SEP and Health?

Health StatusSEP

Accumulated Risk of Exposure

Across the Lifecourse

Physical Hazards(cold/damp housing,air pollution, toxins, accidents, nutrition

arduous work)

Psychosocial Hazards

(low status & control, uncertainty,‘life events’)

Vulnerability &Resilience

Biological(embedded organ or

systemweaknesses)

Psychosocial (human capital,social affiliations& social capital)

Health Care(including prevention)

Page 19: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

The Plan

What is poverty? Why should we be concerned about poverty

and people with intellectual disabilities? What are the implications for research, policy

& practice?

Page 20: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Poverty and Intellectual Disability

In high income economies there is a clear association between poverty and the incidence and prevalence of mild/moderate (but not severe) intellectual disability

Leonard, H., & Wen, X. (2002). The epidemiology of mental retardation: challenges and opportunities in the new millennium. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 8, 117-134.

Leonard, H. et al., (2005). Association of sociodemographic characteristics of children with intellectual disability in Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1499-1513.

Page 21: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Area Deprivation & Identification of Developmental Disability

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

1 2 3 4 5 6+

English Index of Depivation 2004 National Deciles

Pre

vale

nce MID

SID

PMID

ASD

Page 22: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

In General …

Poverty is related to Mortality General health Mental health Educational attainment Life experiences and

opportunities

http://www.who.int/social_determinants/en/

Intellectual disability

Page 23: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Equivalised Household Income & Conduct Disorder Among British Children with Intellectual Disabilities 1999 & 2004

10%

20%

30%

40%

1 2 3 4 5

Equivalised Income Quintile

Page 24: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Life Events & Emotional Disorder

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

ID+ASD ID noASD no ID

No Life Event

1 Type of Life Event

2+ Types of Life Event

Page 25: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

http://www.ic.nhs.uk/pubs/learndiff2004

Page 26: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Poverty & Neighbourhood Deprivation

Living in unsuitable accommodation

Having less privacy at home Unemployment Not having a voluntary job Not having enjoyed school Being bullied at school Not taking a course Not attending a day centre Not having control over money Less likely to see members of

their family Being an unpaid carer Seeing friends less often Doing a smaller range of

community activities Not having voted

Not knowing about local advocacy groups

Feeling unsafe Being bullied Being a victim of crime Having poor health Having a long-standing illness

or disability Smoking Not being happy Being sad or worried Feeling left out Feeling helpless Not feeling confident Having unmet needs Having wanted to complain

about the support they receive

Page 27: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Area Deprivation & Self-Rated HealthAdults with Intellectual Disability, England 2003/4

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

1 2 3 4 5

Area Deprivation Quintile

Hea

lth

'No

t G

oo

d'

Page 28: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Attributable Risk

Controlling for increased risks of exposure to potential hazards accounts for 20-35% of the increased risk of

poor child health and mental health

100% of the increased risk of maternal unhappiness

50%+ of the increased risk of maternal low self-esteem and self-efficacy

Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (in press). American Journal on Mental Retardation. Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (in press). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Emerson, E., Hatton, C., Blacher, J., Llewellyn, G. & Graham, H. (2006). Socio-economic position, household composition, health status and indicators of the well-being of mothers of children with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 50, 862-873.

Page 29: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Obesity Among Women

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+

Women with ID

Women

Poorest 20% of Women

Page 30: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Obesity Among Women (in poverty)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75+

Women with ID

Women

Poorest 20% of Women

Page 31: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

The Plan

What is poverty? Why should we be concerned about poverty

and people with intellectual disabilities? What are the implications for research, policy

& practice? Delivery Conceptualisation & design of ‘interventions’

Page 32: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Inequity of ‘Need’% of British Children with Intellectual Disabilities & Mental Health Problems by Family Circumstances

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

British Families British Familes withChild with ID +

Conduct Disorder

Couple, not in poverty

Lone parent, not inpoverty

Couple living in poverty

Lone parent living inpoverty

Page 33: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Delivery Implications

Resource allocation ‘Goodness of fit’ Differential efficacy, effectiveness and

efficiency of interventions Does this intervention reduce (or exacerbate)

inequalities?

‘financial disadvantage was the most salient moderator of outcomes’ of group-based behavioural parent training

Lundahl, B, Risser, H J, Lovejoy, M C (2006). A meta-analysis of parent training: Moderators and follow-up effects. Clinical Psychology Review 26 (2006) 86– 104

Page 34: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Conceptualisation & Design

Health StatusSEP

Accumulated Risk of Exposure

Across the Lifecourse

Physical Hazards(cold/damp housing,air pollution, toxins, accidents, nutrition)

Psychosocial Hazards

(low status & control, uncertainty,‘life events’)

Vulnerability &Resilience

Biological(embedded organ

weaknesses, fitness)

Psychosocial (human capital,social affiliations& social capital)

Health Care(including prevention)

Page 35: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Interventions

Generic risk reduction Poverty reduction

Specific risk reduction (mediating variables) Housing quality Parenting practices Child protection

‘The reforms outlined in the Child Poverty Review must be implemented to end child deprivation and therefore reduce risk factors for mental health problems.’

Page 36: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Conceptualisation & Design

Health StatusSEP

Accumulated Risk of Exposure

Across the Lifecourse

Physical Hazards(cold/damp housing,air pollution, toxins, accidents, nutrition)

Psychosocial Hazards

(low status & control, uncertainty,‘life events’)

Vulnerability &Resilience

Biological(embedded organ

weaknesses, fitness)

Psychosocial (human capital,social affiliations& social capital)

Health Care(including prevention)

Page 37: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

Interventions: Building Resilience Individual Family Community

Nurturing, affectionate and secure relationships with parent

Supportive relationship with other adult

Positive, rewarding school environments

Sense of ‘connectedness’ to the school and/or local community

Positive personal achievements Involvement in pro-social peer

groups Positive ‘temperament’ Problem solving Sense of meaning

Page 38: Poverty & People with Intellectual Disabilities Eric Emerson Institute for Health Research Lancaster University eric.emerson@lancaster.ac.uk

In Conclusion ….

The health & social inequalities faced by people with intellectual disabilities are, in part, the result of poverty (rather than intellectual disability)

To address these inequalities we need to think beyond social & clinical interventions and directly address the social factors that generate inequality

[email protected]