port debt review and refunding strategy · 2019. 3. 18. · 2014a rev $ 6,473,173 anytime refunding...
TRANSCRIPT
Port Debt Review and Refunding Strategy
March 21, 2019
1
Total Port Debt
$ Million as of 1/1/19 Variable
Swapped variable to fixed
Fixed Total
General Obligation Bonds
$150.458 $150.458
Senior Revenue Bonds
$173.688 $173.688
Subordinate Revenue Bonds
$41.902 $227.587 $269.490
Revenue Bond Total
$41.902 $227.587 $173.688 $443.178
Commercial Paper
$25.0 $25.00
All Total $66.902 $227.587 $324.146 $618.6362
Existing General Obligation Bond
• 2016 bonds are refundable at this time but not economical to refund
• 2016 bonds are held by Zion’s Bank
• 2016A and 2017 are held by the public
• Debt payments backed by the Port’s tax Levy
Port General Obligation debt rating of AA/Aa2
Series Outstanding Par Call Date Purpose Interest Rate
ModeFinal
MaturityCredit
EnhancementLOC/DP
Expiration DateSummary of Refunded
BondsAdditional
Refunding Notes
2016 LTGO 24,893,000$ Anytime Refunding Fixed RateDirect Purchase 12/1/2025 None N.A. - 2008A LTGO (2019-2025)
2016A LTGO 106,155,000$ 12/1/2026 Refunding Fixed Rate 12/1/2033 None N.A. -2006 LTGO (2017-2033)-2008A LTGO (2018, 2026-2038)
-2006 LTGO refunded 1997B & 2003 LTGOs
2017 LTGO (Taxable) 19,410,000$ 12/1/2027 Refunding Fixed Rate 12/1/2038 None N.A. -2008B LTGO (AMT) (2018-2038)
Total 150,458,000$
All-In True Interest Cost
1.9942%
2.7047%
3.1775%
Coupon
1.060% - 2.360%
GO
Bon
ds(R
ated
Aa2
/AA
)
2.500% - 3.400%
3.000% - 5.000%
3
Existing General Obligation Bond Annual debt service
4
Existing Senior Revenue Debt
• 2014A and 2014B bonds are refundable at this time but not economical
• 2014A & B bonds are held by Columbia Bank
• 2016 bonds are publicly traded
Port Senior Revenue debt rating of AA-/Aa3
Series Outstanding Par Call Date Purpose Interest Rate
ModeFinal
MaturityCredit
EnhancementLOC/DP
Expiration DateSummary of Refunded
BondsAdditional
Refunding Notes
2014A REV 6,473,173$ Anytime Refunding Fixed RateDirect Purchase 12/1/2021 None N.A. -2004A Rev (Term 2021)
2014B REV 28,455,000$ Anytime Refunding Fixed RateDirect Purchase 12/1/2029 None N.A. -2004B Rev (2014-2016, 2017-
2029)
2016A REV 36,535,000$ 12/1/2026 Refunding Fixed Rate 12/1/2034 None N.A. -2006 Rev (2017-2034)-2006 Rev refunded 2004A Rev
2016B REV (AMT) 102,405,000$ 12/1/2026 New Money Fixed Rate 12/1/2043 None N.A. N.A.
Total 173,868,173$
2.5886%
2.5223%
3.6417%
All-In True Interest Cost
2.6430%
Coupon
2.550%
4.000% - 5.000%
SR. R
EV B
onds
(R
ated
Aa3
/AA
-)
2.500%
2.000% - 5.000%
5
Existing Subordinate Revenue Debt
• All subordinate lien bonds are variable rate
• All subordinate lien bonds are held by banks
• All subordinate lien bonds are matched to interest rate swaps
• The Commercial paper is publicly traded and backed by a bank Letter Of Credit (LOC)
Port Subordinate Revenue debt rating of A+/A1
Series Outstanding Par Call Date Purpose Interest Rate
ModeFinal
MaturityCredit
EnhancementLOC/DP
Expiration DateSummary of Refunded
BondsAdditional
Refunding Notes
2008 REV (AMT) 65,190,000$ Anytime Refunding Variable Direct Purchase
Variable Rate + Bank Fee 4.5092% 12/1/2036 None July 2020 -1997 Rev (AMT) (2011-2017)
-2006 Rev (AMT) (2009-2036)
2008B REV (Non-AMT) 122,180,000$ Anytime New Money Variable Direct
PurchaseVariable Rate +
Bank Fee 4.4792% 12/1/2044 None Nov 1, 2019 N.A.
2014A REV (AMT) 82,120,000$ Anytime Refunding Variable Direct Purchase
Variable Rate + Bank Fee 4.4192% 12/1/2035 None Oct 1, 2019 -2004B Rev (AMT) (2029-2034)
-2005 Rev (AMT) (2014-2035)
Total 269,490,000$
SUB
. C
P Commercial Paper 25,000,000$ (1) Anytime(at maturity)
New Money & Refunding Variable Variable Rate +
Bank Fee N/A BofA LOC April 2019N/A
All-In True Interest CostCoupon
SUB
. REV
Bon
ds(R
ated
A1/
A+)
6
Existing Revenue Bond Annual debt service
7
• Due to changes in US corporate tax rates, the current agreement on the subordinate lien bonds does not provide the port with the lowest possible interest costs.
• Staff can change the “mode” of the 2008 and 2008B subordinate lien bonds to capture lower interest costs but there are costs associated with making the change
• The 2014A bond resolution will need to be revised to allow the “mode” change to capture savings – Commission approval required
Opportunity
8
• Interest rates were increasing but have leveled off or dropped but are above historical lows
• Current interest rate curve makes refunding and or changing the “mode” of the subordinate lien Revenue bonds attractive
Market Conditions
9
Floating Payments(Floating interest rate x
notional amount)
Counterparty
Bond Holders
Variable interest
rate
Fixed Payments(Fixed interest rate x
notional amount)
Port
Fundamentals of a Fixed for Floating Interest Rate Swap
10
Floating Payments(Floating interest rate x
notional amount)
Counterparty
BANK
Variable interest
rate
Fixed Payments(Fixed interest rate x
notional amount)
Port
Fundamentals of a Fixed for Floating Interest Rate Swap – Direct Purchase
Historical direct purchase agreements these payments matched
70% of LIBOR
70% of LIBOR
11
Floating Payments(Floating interest rate x
notional amount)
Counterparty
BANK
Variable interest
rate
Fixed Payments(Fixed interest rate x
notional amount)
Port
Fundamentals of a Fixed for Floating Interest Rate Swap
After tax reform, these cash flows do not match, causing increased interest expense to the Port
70% of LIBOR
80% of LIBOR
12
Floating Payments(Floating interest rate x
notional amount)
Counterparty
Bond Holders
Variable interest
rate
Fixed Payments(Fixed interest rate x
notional amount)
Port
Fundamentals of a Fixed for Floating Interest Rate Swap
Market rate payments to bond holders should result in lower interest cost
70% of LIBOR
Market Rate
13
Historical tax exempt rates (SIFMA)SIFMA vs. 70% of LIBOR
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
2.0%
Jan-
16
May
-16
Sep
-16
Jan-
17
May
-17
Sep
-17
Jan-
18
May
-18
Sep
-18
Jan-
19
Spot
Rat
es
SIFMA 70% of LIBOR
14
Historical tax exempt rates (SIFMA)
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
Jan-
07
Jan-
08
Jan-
09
Jan-
10
Jan-
11
Jan-
12
Jan-
13
Jan-
14
Jan-
15
Jan-
16
Jan-
17
Jan-
18
Jan-
19
Spot
Rat
es
SIFMA 70% of LIBOR
Period Dates SIFMA LIBOR RatioSince 2007 2007-2019 0.82% 1.12% 70.8%Before Tax Reform 2007-2017 0.76% 1.01% 71.0%After Tax Reform 2018-2019 1.43% 2.09% 69.0%2019 2019 1.53% 2.50% 61.2%Current 3/5/2019 1.74% 2.48% 70.1%
Average Rates
15
BankGuarantees payment to
Bond Holder via a Letter of Credit (LOC)
Bond Holders
Variable interest
rate
Port
Fundamentals of a VariableDemand Obligation (VRDO)
Remarketing Agent “sells” bonds on a weekly basis to bond holders
16
• Change mode for 2008 & 2008B from bank direct purchase to Variable Rate Demand Obligation’s (VRDO’s) sold on the open market
• Delegated to staff per existing resolutions
• Refund 2014A by revising doc to VRDO’s sold on the open market
• Resolution update requires Commission approval
• Will return in June/May to request approval
Opportunity
17
• We extended 2008 and 2014A direct purchases by 1 year to let the market “settle” with respect to the % of Libor
• Despite market data, banks are keeping their rate at 79% to 82% of LIBOR
• We see no indication of any changes, so we need to make a change to save money
Why now
18
• Estimated $500,000 cash per year interest savings
• 10% of LIBOR rate with LIBOR at 2%
• Cost of issuance is estimated at $600k
• Rating agencies• Bank council• Bond and disclosure council• Financial advisor
Why now
19
• RFP for remarketing agents who will market the bonds to investors
• Could be 1, 2 or 3 remarketers• RFP for 3 Letter of Credits
• Could be 1, 2 or 3 banks• Develop necessary resolution and
marketing information
• Obtain Commission approval of revised resolution (June or May meeting)
• Execute on plan
Next Steps
20
• We have $40M of variable rate debt that is not matched to a swap.
• We considered “fixing” this debt long term when the interest rate curve was more flat.
• Since the beginning of 2019, rates have decreased and the curve became “ less flat”
• Fixing out the bonds long term would increase rates from ~1.5% to ~3%. Not economical
• May fix out short to save cost
Other consideration
21