poor man’s temp attribution ccmval dt attribution ccmval radiation comparison

27
Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison Piers Forster

Upload: zona

Post on 12-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison. Piers Forster. Cordero and Forster, 2006. 30N-30S 1979-2000 AR4 models. 50 hPa. Cordero and Forster, 2006. CCMval. Validation of Chemistry Climate Models – entering 3 rd year Eyring et al. papers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Poor man’s temp attributionCCMVal DT attribution

CCMval radiation comparisonPiers Forster

Page 2: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Cordero and Forster, 2006

30N-30S

1979-2000

AR4 models

Page 3: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Cordero and Forster, 2006

50 hPa

Page 4: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

CCMval

• Validation of Chemistry Climate Models – entering 3rd year– Eyring et al. papers

– Myself and Victor Formichev doing CCMVal radiation intercomparison. Victor does stratopause up

– may extend to J values for chemists– May part is now supported by small grant so

should progress faster

Page 5: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 6: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 7: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Cagnazzo et al ACP, 2007Improvements to ECHAM5 SW scheme

Page 8: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

CCMVal Radiation: FutureTesting Radiation schemes

About 8 CCM groups signed up, hopefully get all involvedFollow Collins et al. 2006 procedure• Questionnaire for groups to document radn scheme• Website with zonally averaged Jan climatology ERA40,

up to 0.1 hPa• Series of clear sky GHG perturbations:• Ozone, water vapour, CO2, CH4, N2O• Look at fluxes and heating rates

– Maybe FDH calculations• Maybe extend to: aerosol and cloud

• Worrying about truthing : LBL and Discrete-Ordinate Model (One so far + others)

Page 9: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Problems with strat attribution

IPCC type climate models: poor radiation schemes and resolution

Coupled chemistry models are also now common and don’t prescribe ozone

Don’t trust tropical tropopause response or polar stratospheric dynamical response

Information lost in broad weighting functions

Page 10: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

The answer

• Go back to doing Fixed Dynamical Heating rate calculations at high vertical resolution with accurate radiation schemes– Just like I’ve always done!

Page 11: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Randel and Wu ozone - actual absolute monthly values – includes QBO and solar cycle effect on ozone , LLGHGs FDH

Page 12: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Tropics: lower strat

Page 13: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Forster, Solomon, Bodeker, Schofield, and Thompson: draft for GRL

Page 14: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Forster, Solomon, Bodeker, Schofield, and Thompson: draft for GRL

Page 15: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Forster, Solomon, Bodeker, Schofield, and Thompson: draft for GRL

Page 16: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

CCMVAL Temperature trendsAustin et al. paper

• Simulations of temperature from models from 1970s until 2000

• Output of zonally averaged, ozone, water vapour, llghgs, temp, (aerosols?)

My task• Do FDH temperature calcs with ozone and

LLGHG trends from model to attribute model trends – i.e. understand model temp response

Page 17: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

Top of Atmosphere Fluxes

Page 18: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 19: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 20: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 21: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 22: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 23: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 24: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 25: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 26: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison
Page 27: Poor man’s temp attribution CCMVal DT attribution CCMval radiation comparison

1985-2005 trends