policy approaches to undernutrition
DESCRIPTION
Policy Approaches to Undernutrition. Text extracted from The World Food Problem Leathers and Foster, 2004. http://www.lastfirst.net/images/product/R004548.jpg. Ethics: Pope John Paul II. “Contrasts between poverty and wealth are intolerable for humanity” - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Policy Approaches to Undernutrition
Text extracted from
The World Food Problem
Leathers and Foster, 2004
http://www.lastfirst.net/images/product/R004548.jpg
Ethics: Pope John Paul II
• “Contrasts between poverty and wealth are intolerable for humanity”
• “It is the task of nations, their leaders, their economic powers and all people of goodwill
• to seek every opportunity for a more equitable sharing of resources”– Example of Beneficence
• Personal moral duty to help the poor
http://schoolnet.gov.mt/liceovassalli/mav/MAV%20Zones/Students/Essays/Pope%20John%20Paul%20II.jpg
Ethics: Right to Food?
• Right to Food – Included in International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
– Adopted by UN– Signed by 85 countries
• Now must address hunger issue– to protect fundamental rights
of society– Don’t need to feel personal
moral duty to help the poorUnited Nations
http://orrinwoodward.blogharbor.com/United%20Nations%20Assembly.jpg
Ethics: Right to Food?
• Rights taken very seriously
• Absolute entitlement• Non-negotiable• Would require
government to act to prevent hunger
• Conflict with property rights?Feeding orphans, Yemen
http://www.yobserver.com/uploads/1/orphans5.jpg
Economist’s Questions
• What is the appropriate policy for society as a whole?
• How can government best manipulate human greed to achieve its policy objectives?
http://neweconomist.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/20061110_inside_the_economists_mind_cove.gif
Government
IdeologyEconomy
How to Move Society Forward
Self-interest
Manipulate self-interest to achieve policy goals
Capitalism
Economics Policy Decisions
• Every action has costs and benefits• Marginal costs and benefits
– For 1% increase in cost, what is the increase in benefits?
• Ideal decision: where marginal costs = marginal benefits
• Free market will allocate resources optimally, but– Without concern for
• Social costs• Environmental costs
– Can everything be put in dollar terms?Three Gorges Dam, China
http://www.thelightisgreen.com/China%20Three%20Gorges%20Dam%2001.jpg
Externalities
• Costs and benefits sometimes go to people outside the market transaction– Should wealthy benefit from costs
borne• By the poor?
– Exploitation = externality
• By the environment?– Exploitation = externality
– To feed hungry has indirect benefit to wealthy
• We feel better = externality• No market for this
http://wheresmyamerica.files.wordpress.com/2007/08/smoke-stack1.jpg
Every action has costs and benefits
• How much would you pay for… – A human life?
• Speed limit 10 MPH?
• Nutrition for every man, woman, and child?
– Food without pesticide residue?
– No pollution?
– Freedom?
– Fair trade?
http://www.superkidsnutrition.com/app_themes/sba_nutrition/images/NA_ProtectSelfFromPesticides.jpg
Harnessing greed in policy
• Economic incentives– Can make it more expensive
• To have children• To degrade the environment
– Need property rights
• Production increases with reward– If we eat less:
• other countries won’t benefit• Farmers will produce less
• As demand increases– efficiency increases
• Products made available more cheaply• Alternatives found
http://sheepwaker.tripod.com/greed.jpg
Policy to reduce undernutrition?
• 250 Calories/day would erase Calorie deficit of hungry– Cost 35 cents/day/person– = $6,400 invested at 2%
interest– Value of Human Life?
• For 800 million people, this policy would – Increase food prices– Increase environmental
costs of food production
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/images/africa/july-dec07/1126_somalia_bhead2.jpg
Policies to raise incomes of poor
• Redistribute income from rich to poor– Rationale: declining
marginal utility of income• Rich don’t benefit from a
dollar spent as much as poor do
– But should incomes be equalized?
• Improve rate of economic growth– Is Globalization beneficial
to developing nations?
http://www.alliance2015.org/var/news/storage/images/galleries/world_poverty_map/2452-1-eng-GB/world_poverty_map.jpg
Policies to reduce price of food
• Population reduction– Demand will rise
slower
– Food prices will rise slower
• Increasing supply– Research investment
– Loans to farmers
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2300/2198720003_b56c80b97c_o.jpg
Policies to reduce cost of food
• Price supports• Sell food to consumers• Subsidies to farmers
– Both reduce economic efficiency
– Therefore distortionary
• Corrective price policies – Example: correcting
distortions that reduce food output
Aid Policies
• Aid can help– If targeted to poor
• Example: School feeding
– In emergencies
• Aid can hurt – If wealthy elites profit from it
• makes the problem worse
• Often designed to further our national and trade interests
• Directed mainly at political allies– not hungry nations
http://www.bread.org/assets/images/learn/food-aid.jpg
http://static.flickr.com/51/189662626_257b15004f_o.jpg
Aid Policies
• Have been used as a lever– to impose “structural adjustment”
on foreign trade policies
• If foreign countries do not open up markets – or reduce subsidies as directed by
U.S.• Aid may stop
• Designed to create new markets– foster dependence on U.S. grain
• Koreahttp://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5111439M5NL._SL500_AA240_.jpg
Aid Policies
• When aid is given as free grain– undermines prices for farmers
– driving them out of business
• Military aid can lead to armed conflicts – that generate hungry people
• Well-off divert aid to help themselves– further widening gap between
haves and have-notshttp://www.wfp.org/img/newsroom/afghanistan/310/dscn0678.jpg
U.S.Agency for International Development (USAID)
• Started with Marshall Plan after WWII
• Principal U.S. foreign aid agency to help countries:– Recover from disaster– Escape poverty– Democratic reforms
• Partnership with – 3,500 U.S. businesses– 3,000 Organizations
• $8.8 Billion
USAID in Uganda
U.S. Foreign Aid
• U.S. gave $28 billion (2007)
• Largest Donor in world
• Less generous based on capacity to give (GNP)
• < 0.22% Federal Budget– Majority think U.S.
Aid is 20X more
http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/05/business_aid_and_development/img/1.jpg
U.S. Foreign Aid Budget
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2389/2429946098_2f24950561.jpg
U.S. Generosity
• 2007 Government Aid:– $28 billion
• 2007 Private giving – $93 billion
• $61 billion: private payments to family members
• 2007 Private Lending, Investment– $69 billion
http://photos.state.gov/libraries/usinfo-photo/39/week_4_0507/052507-AidChart_en_200.jpg
Third World Debt
• Forgiving third-world debt– would help countries become
self-sufficient
• Honduras annual debt payments – exceed amount spent on health
and education combined
• Total debt payments – greater than foreign aid and
foreign investment combined
http://bloodbankers.typepad.com/submerging_markets/chart_intro.1.%20Growth%20of%20the%20Debt.jpg
http://www1.worldbank.org/devoutreach/spring01/images7/hipc_map_7.gif