point vs. vad scans for complex terrain

18
Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain G. D. Emmitt and C. O’Handley WG SBLW Destin, FL January 27-30, 2009

Upload: taryn

Post on 30-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain. G. D. Emmitt and C. O’Handley WG SBLW Destin, FL January 27-30, 2009. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

G. D. Emmitt and C. O’HandleyWG SBLWDestin, FL

January 27-30, 2009

Page 2: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Overview The conical scan is the traditional pattern used to obtain vertical profiles of the wind field with an airborne Doppler wind lidar. Nadir or zenith pointing scanning wedges are ideal for this type of scan.

A bi-axis scanner has been operated on a Navy Twin Otter for more than 6 years and was installed on a Navy P3 for use in a field experiment to study typhoons.

The bi-axis scanner enables a broad range of scanning patterns. A subset of the possible patterns is critical to obtaining useful wind profiles in the presence of complex terrain or small (~ 100's of meters) organized atmospheric structures (rolls, updrafts, waves, etc).

Several scanning strategies have been tested in flights over the Monterey Peninsula and within tropical cyclones. Combined with Google Earth (on-board) and satellite imagery overlays, new realtime adaptive scanning algorithms are being developed and tested.

Page 3: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

TODWLscanner

STV

Particleprobes

SurfaceTemperatureSensor

Page 4: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

The instrument

• 2µm coherent detection (CTI MAG1A)• 2 mJ ; 500 Hz• 10 cm two axis scanner, side door mounted• GUI with realtime instrument control and data

display• Range: .3 – 21km depending upon aerosols• Accuracy: < .10 m/s in three components• Weight: 700lb Power: 700 W

Page 5: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain
Page 6: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Scanning options

• Nadir step-stare conical (3 – 12 positions) for vertical profiles for u, v, w & aerosols

• Zenith step-stare (u, v, w)• Forward sweeping (prospecting for OLEs and

shear layers ahead of aircraft• Nadir point scans (u,v,w) in complex terrain

and organized flows (e.g. OLEs)

Page 7: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000EAST/W EST D ISTAN C E (M )

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

NO

RT

H/S

OU

TH

DIS

TA

NC

E (

M)

SC AN PATTER N FO R "PO IN T SC AN "3 C O M PLETE SC AN SG S: 64 M /S , H T: 1950 M , D W ELL: 2 SECBLAC K: 1200 MR ED : 750 MBLU E: 300 M

FLIG H T TR ACK

Page 8: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000EAST/W EST D ISTAN C E (M )

-3000

-2000

-1000

0

1000

2000

3000

NO

RT

H/S

OU

TH

DIS

TA

NC

E (

M)

SC AN PATTER N FO R "VAD "2 C O M PLETE SC AN SG S: 64 M /S , H T: 1950 M , D W ELL: 2 SECBLAC K: 1200 MR ED : 750 MBLU E: 300 M

FLIG H T TR ACK

Page 9: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Ridge and Valley

Page 10: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

-45000 -44000 -43000 -42000 -41000 -40000

10000

11000

12000

13000

14000

15000SCAN C O VERAG ERED : VADS 10 - 13, F ILE 1226 (SW TR ACK)BLACK: PO INT, 1241 (NE TR ACK)LO S 'S EN D AT 950 M M SL

Page 11: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain
Page 12: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

POINT

Speed Comparison Over High Complex Terrain

Page 13: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Valley Floor

Page 14: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

-54000 -53000 -52000 -51000 -50000 -49000

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000SCAN C O VER AG ER ED : VAD S 4 - 6 , F ILE 1231 (SW TR AC K)BLACK: PO IN T, 1237 (N E TRAC K)LO S 'S END AT 150 M M SL

Page 15: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain
Page 16: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Speed comparisons over valley floor

POINT

Page 17: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

-2000 -1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000

-2000

-1500

-1000

-500

0

500

1000

1500

2000

STAR TIN G PO IN T(A IR C R AFT LO C ATIO N )

TAR G ET PO IN T

TAN G ENT PO IN T

SAM PLE PO IN T SC AN G EO M ETR Y

FLIG HT TRACK

Page 18: Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain

Acknowledgements

• Most of our research on profiling in complex terrain and the implications to model validation/initialization has been funded under an SBIR through the Army Research Office (Dr. Walter Bach).

• Additional funds were provided by the Integrated Program Office of NPOESS (Dr. Stephen Mango)