plasma diagnostic in eruptive prominences from sdo/aia observations at 304 Å
DESCRIPTION
Presentation given at the 4th France-China Solar Physics Meeting, 15-18 November 2011, NiceTRANSCRIPT
Plasma diagnostic in eruptive prominences from SDO/AIA observations at 304 Å
Nicolas Labrosse and Kristopher McGlinchey
University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Motivation
Theoretical calculations have shown that when solar prominences
move away from the surface of the Sun, their radiative output is
affected via the Doppler dimming or brightening effects. Hyder & Lites (1970), Heinzel & Rompolt (1987), Gontikakis et al (1997), Labrosse et al (2007, 2008)
This is due to their strong sensitivity to the incoming radiation from the solar disc.
He II resonance lines are mostly formed by scattering of the incident radiation under
typical quiescent prominence conditions.
Can we find observational signatures of the changes in the radiative
output of eruptive prominences in EUV observations at 304 Å?
What are the plasma parameters in eruptive prominences?
We analyse SDO/AIA observations and compare them with new non-
LTE radiative transfer calculations of the He II 304 Å line intensity in
eruptive prominences.
The prominence model
•1D plane-parallel vertical slab Free parameters
Gas pressure
Temperature
Column mass
Height above the limb
Radial velocity
Equations to solve Pressure equilibrium, ionisation and
statistical equilibria (SE), radiative
transfer (RT) for H (20 levels)
SE, RT for other elements: He I (29
levels) + He II (4 levels)
The prominence model
4
Effects of radial motions
•For a simple 2-level atom with photo-excitation
–Doppler dimming if the incident line is in emission
–Doppler brightening if the incident line is in absorption
•If coupling between several atomic levels
–situation gets more complex: dimming and brightening
–e.g. coupling between first two excited levels of H
•Factors determining effects of radial motions
–line formation mechanism (resonant scattering, thermal processes)
–details of incident radiation (strength, emission/absorption)
See Labrosse et al (2010)
Effects of radial motions
V=0 km s-1
V=80 km s-1
V=200 km s-1
V=400 km s-1
He I 584 He II 304 He I 10830
T = 8000 K
T = 15000 K
Labrosse et al. (2007)
6
He II 304 Å line sensitive to Doppler dimming
line mostly formed by scattering of incident radiation coming from the Sun
Labrosse et al. (2007)
Plasma motions in prominences
7
Results (5)
Doppler dimming effect on Helium resonance lines stronger if:
Cool plasma
Not too dense
Large temperature gradient in PCTR
NB: Plasma parameters are kept constant
Increasing column mass with all other parameters kept constant means more hot material → collisional component becomes more important ⇒ the line is less sensitive to Doppler dimming
Initial results
Question
Is Doppler dimming observed in eruptive prominences?
9
2011-06-10
2010-09-08
SDO/AIA observations
Summary of observations
Variation of He II 304 intensity with radial velocity
Decreases in some cases, increases in others
How is this related to the pure Doppler dimming effect?
Need new computations
Allow plasma parameters to vary during eruption
Randomly chosen input parameters (within limits)
11
New computations
Reference model
T=8800 K
M=4.8 10-5 g cm-2
Solid line
Effect of Doppler
dimming alone (no
variation of plasma
parameters)
Equal proportion of models showing computed intensities in the He II
line either greater or lower than the intensity of the reference (static) model.
Summary
•Observations show either a decrease or an increase of intensity with
radial velocity.
•New non-LTE models explain the different behaviour of the
intensities by changes in the plasma parameters inside the
prominence, in particular the column mass of the plasma and its
temperature.
•These new non-LTE models are more realistic than what was used
in previous calculations as they allow all plasma parameters to vary.
•They are able to reproduce qualitatively the range of observations
from SDO/AIA.
Labrosse & McGlinchey (accepted in A&A)
Velocity vs. time
Model parameters