planning – lup process

21
Planning – LUP Process I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures III.Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs C. Placing LWCs in the Land Use Planning Process D. LWCs and Proposed Projects Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM

Upload: koren

Post on 24-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Wilderness Characteristics Guidance for the BLM. I. Introduction II. Inventory Procedures Planning A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCs C. Placing LWCs in the Land Use Planning Process D. LWCs and Proposed Projects. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Planning –  LUP  Process

Planning – LUP Process

I. IntroductionII. Inventory ProceduresIII. Planning

A. Background to LWCs in Planning B. Factors to Consider When Protecting LWCsC. Placing LWCs in the Land Use Planning

ProcessD. LWCs and Proposed Projects

Wilderness Characteristics

Guidance for the BLM

Page 2: Planning –  LUP  Process

Considering lands with wilderness characteristics

in land use planning:Land Use Planning Process

Planning – LUP Process

Wilderness Characteristics

Guidance for the BLM

Page 3: Planning –  LUP  Process

Preparation Plan Issue Identification

are LWCs a planning issue? what associated concerns expected?

Note: narrowly-focusedLUP Amendments may not

require considering protection of LWCs -

BUT still analyze impacts in NEPA!Planning – LUP Process

Page 4: Planning –  LUP  Process

Preparation Plan Issue Identification Preliminary Planning Criteria

constraints & sideboards? existing planning decisions?

Planning – LUP Process

Page 5: Planning –  LUP  Process

Preparation Plan Issue Identification Preliminary Planning Criteria Data Needs

new information from externals? existing inventories sufficient? data gaps? new inventory needed?

Planning – LUP Process

Page 6: Planning –  LUP  Process

Preparation Plan Issue Identification Preliminary Planning Criteria Data Needs Budget

labor & support for inventory? records & documentation costs?

Planning – LUP Process

Page 7: Planning –  LUP  Process

Scoping NOI mentions LWCs

include planning criteria identified Tribal consultation Scoping Report

summarize WC comments & issues

Planning – LUP Process

Page 8: Planning –  LUP  Process

Analysis of theManagement

Situation prepare area profile for each LWC

describe location reference current inventory results explain current management incorporate analysis from the “Factors” guidance

Planning – LUP Process

Page 9: Planning –  LUP  Process

Affected Environment brief description of each LWC

acreage map of boundaries

inventory process & results current allocations, management “Lands with Wilderness Characteristics” subheading.

Planning – LUP Process

Page 10: Planning –  LUP  Process

Alternatives full range of reasonable alternatives

impacts to wilderness characteristics

impacts to other resourcesa discrete unit

Right: “The wilderness characteristics in area NV-030-16 will be preserved.”Wrong: “The wilderness characteristics are expected to be preserved on approximately 20% of the plan area.”

Planning – LUP Process

Page 11: Planning –  LUP  Process

Alternatives full range of reasonable alternatives

1) Does not protect LWCs2) Does protect LWCs3) Does not protect LWCs, but may

lessen impacts to WCs4) Any combination of 1), 2), or 3).

apply to one LWC apply to all LWCs

Planning – LUP Process

Page 12: Planning –  LUP  Process

Alternatives LWC protection alternatives

no uniform proscriptions in BLMeach plan includes specific

actions

Planning – LUP Process

Page 13: Planning –  LUP  Process

AlternativesMinerals

close to mineral material sales close to mineral leasing lease with NSO – no exceptions recommend Secretarial withdrawal combination?

Planning – LUP Process

Page 14: Planning –  LUP  Process

AlternativesRealty

retain public lands designate ROW exclusion area

Planning – LUP Process

Page 15: Planning –  LUP  Process

AlternativesTransportation

close to construction of new roads close to motor vehicles limit vehicles to designated routes close to motor vehicles & limit mechanized use to designated routes

Planning – LUP Process

Page 16: Planning –  LUP  Process

AlternativesOther

exclude (or restrict)commercial usesother activities

restrict new structuresunrelated to preserving WCsnecessary for allowed uses

designate VRM Class I or II

Planning – LUP Process

Page 17: Planning –  LUP  Process

Alternatives Choose restrictions to protect

wilderness characteristics Honor uses that must be allowed by law Do not use restrictions greater

than necessary Do not use unnecessary

restrictionsPlanning – LUP Process

Page 18: Planning –  LUP  Process

AlternativesAlaska Alert

ANILCA

Planning – LUP Process

Page 19: Planning –  LUP  Process

Environmental Consequences

Direct, indirect and cumulative effects of each alternative on LWCs:

to WCs from protection (or not) to other resources

Effects will vary according to: degree of compatibility degree of enhancement

Planning – LUP Process

Page 20: Planning –  LUP  Process

Final Planning Decision

Consider resources: forgone; adversely affectedBenefitting

Document!Decision is for life of plan

Not permanent

Planning – LUP Process

Page 21: Planning –  LUP  Process

Considering lands with wilderness characteristics

in land use planning:Land Use Planning Process

Planning – LUP ProcessEnd of Module IIIC

Wilderness Characteristics

Guidance for the BLM