pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of adverse effects of nitrendipine i. locatelli, i....
TRANSCRIPT
Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modelling of Adverse Effects of Nitrendipine
I. Locatelli, I. Grabnar, A.Belič, A. Mrhar, R. Karba
University of Ljubljana
Ljubljana, Slovenia
4th MATHMOD, Vienna, 2003
PK-PD Modelling
Pharmacokinetics: – time courses of drug concentration in body fluids
(mainly blood plasma) resulting from a drug dose, – drug (metabolites) concentration determination,
problems with biological matix, LOQ, accuracy
– whole body influence, – steady state or nonsteady state.
PK-PD Modelling
Pharmacodynamics: – effects resulting from a certain drug concentration
Types of drug effects:reversible irreversible– direct (rapid,slow) - chemotherapy– indirect: - enzyme inactivation
transduction processes,
enzyme induction
Effect measurements should be:
sensitive, reproducible, objective and meaningful.
PK-PD Modelling
Goals of modellig:– optimization of drug therapy, – improvement of drug efficacy and safety, – estimating inaccessible system variables,– predicting system response under new conditions.
PK models (one-, two- compartment, ...) PD models (Hill function and its derivatives) Link models (direct vs. indirect link, direct vs. indirect
response... )
Aims
Safety aspect of an antihypertensive drug nitrendipine
Exploration of the relationship between its plasma concentration and occurrence of adverse effects
Criteria for the design of optimal drug dosage regimen and for selecting individuals with high probability for adverse drug reactions
Nitrendipine
Potent calcium channels blocker Vasodilatation and decrease in peripheral vascular
resistance, subsequent reduction of blood pressure Highly variable PK due to extensive first-pass metabolism
(F = 16%) and high plasma protein binding (98 %) PK is linear, no plasma accumulation after once daily
regimen Mild, but frequent adverse effects:
– Headache (vasodilatation in the brain)– Flushing, palpitations, ankle oedema, dizziness (peripheral
vasodilatation and increased baroreflex feedback control)
Database
Replicated 2 x 2 cross over bioequivalence study, 40 male volunteers (18-30 yrs.), single dose 20 mg
16 blood samples in each period up to 48 hrs. after drug administration
During the period of 48 hrs. volunteers were observed for eventual occurrence of adverse effects – recording of onset time and duration
Adverse effects occurred in 26 out of 160 drug applications:– Headache: 24 (average duration 3.3 ± 2.7 hrs.)– Flush: 4– Vertigo: 1
PK/PD analysis – 1. STEP (PK)
Exploration of nitrendipine pharmacokinetics:
compartmental analysis of individual concentration-time
profiles (160 cases):- One/two compartment model with first order absorption and
elimination, with or without lagtime- Model evaluation: Akaike Criterion (AIC), Schwartz Criterion
(SC), parameters’ coeficient of variation (CVpar)
PAROBS NWRSSlnNAIC 2)(
)()( OBSPAROBS NlnNWRSSlnNSC
Nobs
i
PREDi
OBSii CCWWRSS
1
2)(
PK model
Two compartment model with lagtime:
Two diferential equations:
)()( 2112 tUkUkUktUkdt
dUSCCELGITA
C
SCS UkUk
dt
dU 2112
C
CC V
UC
PK model
Two compartment model with lagtime:
Overall equation - integrated:
)(21)(21)(21
))(())(())((LAGALAGLAG ttk
AA
Att
A
tt
AC
AC e
kk
kke
k
ke
k
k
V
kDFC
Estimated PK parameters:
VC/F, kA, kEL, k12, k21 and tLAG
WinNonLin - software
Compartmental PK models
Four linear compartmental models
PK model VC/F [L] kA [h-1] kEL [h-1] k12 [h-1] k21 [h
-1] tLAG [h]
one-compartment
22001940
1.11.4 0.500.20 / / /
one-compartment
with tLAG
23601940
6.26.7 0.480.28 / / 0.540.43
two-compartment
18501490
1.12 .7 0.480.16 0.170.23 0.100.24 /
two compartment
with tLAG
20201790
4.75.6 0.480.23 0.350.46 0.330.50 0.550.50
AIC
36.7
17.5
39.0
13.1
PK/PD analysis – 2. STEP (PD)
Exploration of Pharmacodynamics: Adverse effect-time courses (24 cases only) Fixed effect (or logistic) pharmacodynamic model:
- p – probability that adverse effect will happen
- EC50 – concentration at which the probability of response
(p) is 50%
n50
n
n
ECC
C1Yp
)(
PK/PD analysis – 3.STEP (LINK)
Time [h]
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
Pro
bab
ility
of
hea
dach
e
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
Nitr
end
ipin
e c
on
cent
ratio
n [n
g/m
l]
0
5
10
15
20
PK/PD analysis – 3.STEP (LINK)
Indirect link model (hysteresis): – Direct response model– Soft link PK/PD model– Time independent link model
Simplifications:
)(0 CeCkdt
dCeCE CekCk
dt
dCe0ECE1
PK/PD model
CENTRAL COMPARTMENT
kA 120 mg
nitrendi-pine V
D/F
kEL
PERIPHERAL COMPARTMENT
k12
k21
tLAG
EFFECT COMPARTMENT
t
lnCP
kEO
kEOC
E(t)
ec50
p
CE
headache
1
t
ABSORPTION
ELIMINATION
2
Additonal parameters estimated:kE0, EC50, n
PK/PD model
Two-compartment PK model with lagtime Fixed effect PD model Indirect link model (to minimaze the hysteresis) Model equation:
))()((
)(
))()((
)(
0
)(21
0
)(210
EA
tt
AEAA
ttkA
C
EA
kk
ek
kkkk
ekk
V
kkDFCe
LAGLAGA
))()((
)(
))()((
)(
000
)(021
0
)(21
0
EAEE
ttkE
EA
tt
kkkk
ekk
kk
ek LAGELAG
PK/PD model - case 1
RTA1
02468
101214161820
0 4 8 12 16 20 24t [h]
kon
c. [
ng
/ml]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
verj
etn
ost
Cp Ce FK eksp. podatki
p-Excel p- WinNonLin FD eksp. podatki
n’ kEO [h-1] ec50 [ng/ml]
WinNonLin 2.2 0.15 0.12 2.6 1.9
EXCEL 2.0 0.21 0.19 2.9 2.2
PK/PD parameter estimation
250ECLN
4n
))(var('
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.1 1 10 100Ce
p
Nonlinear regression (SPSS)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.1 1 10 100 1000
concentration in the effect compartment [ng/ml]
p
EC50 = 6.62 ± 0.22 ng/ml (glavobol je prisoten)EC50 = 39.8 ± 2.5 ng/ml (glavobol ni prisoten)
Zaključek
• Na podanih eksperimentalnih podatkih dvoprostorni model s tLAG
najbolje opisuje potek plazemskih koncentracij nitrendipina.
• Aplikacije s stranskim učinkom imajo višjo hitrost in večji obseg absorpcije kot tiste brez stranskega učinka (primerjava povprečnih vrednosti za kA, tMAX, CMAX, AUC).
• subpopulacija skupine z glavobolom ima nižje vrednosti EC50 (večja
občutljivost) kot celotna populacija
• Tako FK parametri (povečana koncentracija nitrendipina) kot FD parametri (povečana občutljivost na nitrendipin) vplivajo na pojav glavobola pri nitrendipinu
Conclusions
• An increased exposure as well as an increased sensitivity to nitrendipine at the site of action were found to expand the probability for side effects.
• The developed methodology could supply useful criteria for the design of optimal drug dosage regimen, moreover it offers possibility for selecting individuals with high probability for adverse drug reactions.