peru´s indc and the way forward - center for …ccap.org/assets/cigaran-peru-indc.pdf · peru´s...
TRANSCRIPT
PERU´S INDC AND THE WAY FORWARD
Maria Paz Cigarán
CCAP LAC Regional Dialogue, February 10-12,2016
10/02/2016
AGENDA
1. INDC Process: What and how we did it
2. The Challenges ahead
3. Sharing our approach: Gestión CC
4. Some final thoughts
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
PlanCC: Inventario GEI 2009, 77MM, 5 escenarios Julio – Sep
6 reuniones con sectores: comentarios a BAU y MM
Ene– 10 Abri 22 reuniones: BAU y MM
Abri – May 19 reuniones: Equipo de investigación
Oct – Dic 17 reuniones: modificaciónes a BAU y MM
Nov Evaluación cumplimiento de compromiso al 2021. Escenarios alternativos
PERU INDC: TECHNICAL PROCESS (2012- 2015)
PLANCC Project (2012-2014), identified NAMAs and sectoral
initiatives were the inputs for the development of the INDC
Multisectoral Commission (Supreme Resolution No 129-2015-PCM )
• Presidency of the Ministers Council • Ministry of Environment • Ministry of Foreign Affairs • Ministry of Economy and Finance • Ministry of Energy and Mines • Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation • Ministry of Transport and Communications • Ministry of Production • Ministry of Construction, Housing and
Sanitation • Ministry of Education • Ministry of Justice and Human Rights • Ministry of Health • Ministry of Culture • Ministry of Development and Social Inclusion
• The temporary Multisectoral Comission had the mandate to develop and approve the technical report of the iNDC.
• It was formed by Ministers or Deputy Ministers.
• Ministry of Environment assume the role of Technical Secretariat.
PERU: INDC MULTISECTORAL COMMISSION
Public Consultation 6 weeks ( Jun 5th- Jul
17th)
Stakeholders • Private sector • Indigenous people • NGOs • Civil Society • Government agenci • Subnational goverments • Academy institutions
Activities • Dissemination Meetings
• 21 meetings, 278 participants
• Macro-regional workshops • 5 workshops, 25 regions, 440 participants
• Web portal and mail submissions • ~100 comments
PERU: INDC PUBLIC CONSULTATION
Item Description
Scope National
Mitigation target and type
Emission reduction equivalent to 30% relative to GHG emissions of the projected BAU scenario in 2030.
Conditional and Non-conditional committments
20% of the emission reduction will be implemented through domestic investment and expenses, and the remaining 10% is subject to the availability of international financing and the existence of favorable conditions.
Baseline Projected BAU scenario (including LULUCF) from 170.6 MtCO2eq in 2010 to 298.3 MtCO2eq in 2030.
Methodologies 1996 IPCC Guidelines 2003 IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF
Considered GHG Carbon dioxide CO2, methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O)
Global Warming Potentials
IPCC SAR values (CH4:21, N2O:310)
PERU: SUBMITTED INDC
PERU: MITIGATION EFFORT DISTRIBUTION
The INDC estimates to reduce 89 MtCO2eq in 2030. Two thirds of the total mitigation would be from LULUCF sector. 76 mitigation options were developed.
Source: MINAM
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF INDC
1. Financial evaluation of selected 10 model projects based on the iNDC
2. Private sector approach
3. Energy, Forestry and Waste N° Sector Nombre
1 Energía Reemplazo de motores (bombas, ventiladores, compresoras de aire y fajas transportadoras)
2 Energía Reemplazo de calderas
3 Energía Cogeneración de electricidad y calor en la industria
4 Energía Reemplazo de lámparas fluorescentes en los sector comercial, industrial y servicios
5 Forestal Reforestación comercial con altos insumos
6 Forestal Implementación de sistemas agroforestales (café + maderables)
7 Forestal Manejo forestal sostenible en concesiones
8 Forestal Manejo sostenible de bosques para castañas
9 Residuos Segregación de residuos inorgánicos y reciclaje
10 Residuos Construcción de rellenos sanitarios con captura, quema de metano y generación eléctrica
-0.2
0.04 0.1
0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7
1.4
1.7
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Pre
sen
t V
alu
e o
f fu
ture
cas
h f
low
s /
Inve
stm
en
t
Segr
ega
ció
n y
rec
icla
je d
e r
esi
du
os
sólid
os
inó
rgan
ico
s
Co
nst
rucc
ión
de
rrs
s co
n c
aptu
ra y
qu
em
a d
e
me
tan
o y
gen
erac
ión
elé
ctri
ca
Re
fore
stac
ión
co
me
rcia
l co
n a
lto
s re
nd
imie
nto
s d
e lo
s in
sum
os
Re
emp
lazo
de
lám
par
as f
luo
resc
en
tes
en e
l sec
tor
com
erc
ial
Imp
lem
en
taci
ón
de
sis
tem
as
agro
fore
stal
es (
café
+ m
ade
rab
les)
Re
emp
lazo
de
mo
tore
s
Man
ejo
so
ste
nib
le e
n c
on
cesi
on
es
fore
stal
es
mad
era
ble
s
Man
ejo
so
ste
nib
le d
e b
osq
ue
s p
ara
cast
añas
Co
gen
era
ció
n d
e
ele
ctri
cid
ad y
cal
or
Re
emp
lazo
de
ca
lde
ras
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF INDC: RESULTS
Elaborado por Intelfin
Energía Residuos Forestal Inversión
Profitability Index 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒇𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒃𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒕𝒚 𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒙 =
𝑬𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒄 𝑵𝑷𝑽
𝑰𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED SCENARIOS
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030
Costo 0 Cobeneficios Sin Cooperación Internacional Escenario 3 ampliado
Escenario BAU
Sectors Number of
measures
Reductions
MtCO2e
Energy 24 5.8
Transport 10 3.4
Industrial P. 8 5.2
Agriculture 10 4.2
LULUCF 11 50.9
Waste 8 2.6
Total 71 72.0
Sectors Number of
measures
Reductions
MtCO2e
Energy 22 4.4
Transport 7 3.2
Industrial P. 8 5.2
Agriculture 7 3.9
LULUCF 8 25.0
Waste 5 0.3
Total 57 42.0
Sectors Number of
measures
Reductions
MtCO2e
Energy 11 3.1
Transport 8 2.1
Industrial P. 3 2.0
Agriculture 8 3.7
LULUCF 11 50.9
Waste 8 2.6
Total 49 64.4
Sectors Number of
measures
Reductions
MtCO2e
Energy 14 4.5
Transport 2 1.4
Industrial P. 7 4.3
Agriculture 3 0.3
LULUCF 7 21.5
waste 2 0.2
Total 35 32.2
Costo 0 Cobeneficios Sin Cooperación Internacional Escenario 3 Ampliado
Mitigation scenarios (previous to final INDC)
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SELECTED SCENARIOS: RESULTS
GDP growth (% of average annual growth)
Period Costo 0 Cobeneficios Sin
Cooperación Internacional
Escenario 3 ampliado
2021 0.1% -0.7% -0.2% -0.6%
2025 0.1% -0.9% -0.5% -0.8%
2030 0.1% -1.0% -0.6% -0.8%
Peru’ s Gross Domestic Product
CHALLENGES AHEAD
1. Goals into action:
– Dissemination, prioritization, the responsible one.
– Who does what: Management models, new coallitions and partnerships
– Policies and Instruments
– Capacity
– Finance: Sources and Structuring
– Tech
– Info and MRV
2. Maintain momentum, pressure from diversity of stakeholders: Others now, private sectors and innovation
3. Pragmatic, in line with needs, new ways of doing things, fast and taking risks.
4. Peru: a different scale, a different animal.
¿Why GestiónCC?
GestiónCC responds to the need for clear
and efficient institutional arrangements
to:
Move from CC planning to CC action, in a
transformative way which meets both its
international commitments and the National
Climate Change Strategy.
Involve public and private key actors and
different levels of goverments in the context
of a low-carbon development and climate
resilient
Optimize financial flows from various sources
such as public sector, international
cooperation and private funds.
3
2
1
Expected results
Propose and test of CC management models to set
institutional and financial arrangements for the implementation
of the ENCC and the iNDCs.
Insert climate change action within decision-making processes
as part of the formulation, financing and implementation of
public and private programs and projects.
Create a critical mass / transformative
community in which transformative climate
change actions are an intrinsic component
of sustainable development.
.
A
managment
model
tested
Influence
in
critical
processes
An ongoing
process with
strengthened
actors
Organigrama de GestiónCC
Pilot
interventions
include Project
certification (
1 )
Institutional
arrangements
( 1 )
Financial
Mechanisms
( 1 )
Knolewdge
managment and
diffussion
( 1 )
MINAM (3)
Steering
Committe (3)
Implemented
Unit
General
Coordination
(1 )
Technical
Assistance
( 1 )
Administration
Legal Affairs and
logistic ( 1 )
Donors Committee ( 2 )
Advisory Committee ( 2
)
Academy, public and private
sector representatives
( 1 ) Implemented Unit ( 2 ) External advisor
( 3 ) Multisectorial Public Director
PUBLIC POLICIES
PROGRAMMES
PROJECTS
INVESTMENTS
From
planning
to
actions
Actions
and
specific
goals
identified
from the
climate
agenda:
iNDC
Make climate
change
action
transversal
within the
context of
national
development
Insert
climate
change
consideratio
ns into
investment
policy in
general
Contribución Nacional – Sector forestal Propuesta del Perú (iNDC)
The Climate Agenda ENCC: 2 interventions
approaches
Forest 1 Sustainable Forest Management in Forest Concessions
6.112
Forest 2 Reorganization of Permanent Forest Production and MFS
6.046
Forest 3 Forest Conservation and Conditional Direct Transfers
5.231
Forest 4 Community Forest Management
0.691
Forest 5 Consolidation of Protected Natural Areas
1.553
Forest 6 Monitoring, control, surveillance and appropriate
land management (Enabling conditiones )
24.495
Forest 7 Commercial Reforestation with High Yield Inputs
7.686
Forest 8 Community Reforestation with Medium Level
Technology 2.673
Forest 9 Agroforestry System for Coffee (NAMA)
0.357
Forest 10 Agroforestry System for Cocoa (NAMA)
0.533
Forest 11 Forestry Management for Chestnuts
0.114
Forest 12 Chestnuts with PSA
2.896
Forest 13 ANP with PSA
2.187
National Contribution – Forestry
Sector Peru´s Proposal (iNDC)
Enabling Conditions - Proper land use
managmement
- Control & surveillance
- Monitoring
Enabling Conditions, Land Use Planning, Control and
Surveillance, Rights Assignment
Institutions - Capacities
Informaction- Infrastructure
Normas
Finance
Cooperation
Stakeholders
Liderazgo Dirección
(Competencias)
Clima para la acción climática
Modelo de intervención
IMPLEMENTACIÓN
Propuesta de intervención:
Del plan a la acción
• Condiciones
Habilitantes
• Ordenamiento
Territorial
• Control y
Vigilancia
• Asignación de
Derechos
Design of public
policies and
investment projects
Leadership
& Direction
(abilities/skills)
)
Conditions for
climate action
(condiciones)
Enabling Conditions
- Appropriate land use
management
- Control &
surveillance
- Monitoring
Intervention Proposal
For planning to actions
Modelo de intervención
IMPLEMENTATION
Propuesta de modelo de gestión e implementación intersectorial
Rules
Proposal of a management model and intersectorial
implementation
Development Project
Priorities of the people
Climate Opportunities
Mitigation
Adaptation
Technical
Assistance:
• Capacities
• Information
• Sources of
Finance
• Public
private
Alliances
Instruments
for
integration
(transversalit
y)
LUP
EAE
Participation
Agreed
Development
Plan Evaluation
Climate Action Seal
Intervention Proposal
Integrate climate action into the national
development context
REGIONAL
INTERVENTION
FINAL THOUGHTS
1. Pradigm shift
2. Two processes needed:
– A new BAU and the Transformational Path (the ambition, what science tells us)
3. Small scale is the big scale: (programatic)
– 90% PYMES and jobs by entreprenuers – Near people needs, perceived – Consumer – Prosumer – Circular economy – On territory
4. The 80/20 rule: For innovation, we need to take risks!
– Faster – More ambition – Easier /Collaboration at a larger scale – Others (non experts, more innovation, entreprenuers, new coallitions)