pems in the united states
TRANSCRIPT
PEMS IN THE UNITED STATES: AND A BROAD LOOK AT ITS APPLICATIONS
Prepared by: Brent Schuchmann, Ph.D.
Senior Research Engineer
SGS North America, Inc
October 16-18, 2017
IQPC Conference – Real Driving Emissions
2
OVERVIEW
SGS AT A GLANCE
PEMS TESTING IN THE LAST YEAR
▪ THE ROLE OF TESTING SERVICES WITH PEMS
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR
ROAD-TO-LAB PEMS CORRELATION
PSEUDO IN-USE PEMS ROUTES FOR RDE
PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS USING MACHINE LEARNING
▪ TRANSPORTATION ANALYTICS PLATFORM (TAPSM)
3
Nº1WORLD LEADER
90 000EMPLOYEES
2 000OFFICES AND LABORATORIES
11GLOBAL INDUSTRIES
GLOBAL SERVICELOCAL EXPERTISE
AT A GLANCE
4
CHEMICAL CONSUMER GOODS AND RETAIL
MINING OIL AND GAS PUBLIC SECTORLIFE SCIENCES
TRANSPORTATIONAGRICULTURE AND FOOD
ENERGY
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING
CONSTRUCTION
5
US TRANSPORTATION TESTING SERVICES
▪ ISO Certified• 9001, 17025, 14001
▪ Servicing Multiple Market
Segments:• Automotive
• Aerospace
• Rail
• Marine
• Off-road
• Non Road
• Power Sports
• Industry Groups
• Government and Regulatory
Agencies
▪ On-Premise Customer Lab
Environments
▪ Growth, Expansion and
Investment
8 Commercial Labs
150 Employees
2 2
4
{
{
6
AURORA, CO
▪ High Feature Test Cells with Extreme Environmental Conditions
▪ Variable Altitude Engine and Chassis Dynamometer Testing
• Diesel and Spark Ignited Engines
• AWD/FWD/RWD Vehicles
• Motorcycle and ATV Chassis Dynamometer
• EPA and CARB Compliant Cells
▪ Particulate Matter Characterization
▪ PEMS & RDE Real Driving Emissions Testing
▪ Variable Temperature SHEDs for Evaporative Emissions
▪ Ideal for catalyst conversion efficiency determination,
light-off, drive cycle effects, complete system performance
▪ On-Road program design, consulting and data analytics
▪ 7 Eddy Current absorbing, Single 40” Roll, FWD/AWD, rapid non-road
Mileage Accumulation Dynamometers in a modern, secure facility.
Research, Development and Emissions Certification Testing
Mileage Accumulation Facility in Jackson, MI
7
ROCKY MTN. TEST CENTER - EMPIRE, CO
▪ Newly Commissioned User Facility - 8900’ (2710m) above sea level
▪ Centrally located near popular vehicle development venues including
Berthoud Pass, Hoosier Pass, Vail Pass, Loveland Pass, Dillon, and
Mount Evans
▪ Four large 50’ x 20’ bays (3 cold bays and 1 workshop with lift/hoist)• Independently controlled refrigeration -22°F (-30°C)
• Large 12’ wide x 14’ high doors
• Vehicle exhaust ventilation
• Onsite fuel storage
• Accommodates multiple customer applications from individual components,
lawn equipment and power sports to light duty vehicles, Class 8 trucks and
construction equipment
▪ Secure Access• Each bay individually keyed and features 24/7 video surveillance, guest Wi-Fi,
office areas and private restrooms
▪ Cost-effective short and long-term rental solutions
▪ Local engineering and calibration services available
Modern & Accessible, 4,800 sq. ft. High Altitude Cold Testing Facility
8
IN-USE REQUIREMENTS AND PEMS
40CFR1065 Subpart J
▪ Field Testing and Portable Emission Measurement Systems
• On-road Heavy-Duty vehicles
• Needs 3 hours of non-idle collection time
• Processes data for valid NTE events
40CFR1039 Subpart E and F
▪ In-use Non-Road Engines
• Does not require PEMS but references 40CFR1065 for testing procedures
40CFR86 Subpart S
▪ In-Use Vehicle Program
• On-road vehicles ≤14,000 lbs GVWR
• Does not require PEMS
9
PEMS TESTING IN THE LAST YEAR
NON-ROAD CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
▪ IN-USE, MODAL, ALTITUDE, COLD-START EMISSIONS
ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY DEVELOPMENT
ON-TRACK HEAVY-DUTY DEVELOPMENT
LIGHT-DUTY CORRELATION CVS TO PEMS
LIGHT-DUTY RDE DEVELOPMENT
LIGHT-DUTY IN-USE VERIFICATION
LIGHT-DUTY ROAD TO LAB
10
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
Available Non-road Excavator
▪ MY 2015, Final Tier 4 engine
▪ 124kW rated engine
▪ Emission Control Technologies:
• Exhaust Gas Recirculation, Turbocharger, Charge Air Cooler, Direct Fuel Injection,
SCR-U, AMOX
▪ PM standard: 0.02 g/kWhr (0.015 g/hphr)
▪ NOx standard: 0.4 g/kWhr (0.3 g/hphr)
Series of modal operations were performed mimicking in-use applications
▪ Several ambient conditions (ambient temperature and elevations)
▪ Data were analyzed for cold starts, warmups, crawls, operation, shutdowns
and the whole test
11
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
12
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
AVL 493 GAS PEMS
▪ CO/CO2, NO/NO2, THC
AVL 494 PM PEMS
▪ Real-time soot concentration (black carbon)
▪ Gravimetric collection of total PM
40CFR1065 compliant
494 PM PEMS 493 GAS PEMS
13
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
Brake-Specific g/kWh
< -1 °C > 1670 m > 1670 m
13 days of testing:
▪ 300m (MI)
• 1400 ft
▪ 1980-2650m (CO)
• 6500 – 8700 ft
▪ -10C to 35C
• 14 - 95F
Data processed with
no exclusions
comparing similar
“modal operations”
▪ Warmups, crawls,
operations
Outside NTE Zone
~ 20x NOx
emissions
at 2650 m
14
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
Outside NTE Zone
< -1 °C > 1670 m > 1670 m
13 days of testing:
▪ 300m (MI)
• 1400 ft
▪ 1980-2650m (CO)
• 6500 – 8700 ft
▪ -10C to 35C
• 14 - 95F
Data processed with
no exclusions
comparing similar
“modal operations”
▪ Warmups, crawls,
operations
Fuel-Specific g/kg
~ 20x NOx
emissions
at 2650 m
15
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
< -1 °C 1670 m 2650 m
NOx emission
reduction strategies
can be observed in
real-time with PEMS
streaming data
It is easy to observe
when EGR and urea
dosing are shut off or
reduced when above
the altitude
requirements for NTE
16
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
Outside NTE Zone
< -1 °C > 1670 m > 1670 m
NOx emissions during
“operations” are
similar to the overall
result for each testing
day
An “operation”
represents the work
performed for a
specific job (i.e.
excavation, trenching)
Fuel-Specific g/kg
17
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
Outside NTE Zone
< -1 °C
Average NOx g/mi during
a “crawl” event are
nearly 2x during cold
temperatures excluded
from the NTE Zone at
the same elevation
A “crawl” event
represents the machine
traveling to or from job
site, refueling, or
maintenance
The “crawls” shown to
the right represent a
distance of 0.6 - 1 km
▪ 2000 – 3000 ft
18
MODAL EMISSIONS OF NON-ROAD EXCAVATOR USING
PEMS
Outside NTE Zone
< -1 °C
Average NOx
emissions during a
“Warmup” event are
37g/kg for multiple
conditions outside of
the NTE Zone
A “Warmup” event
represents first
stationary 10-15
minutes after engine
start. In most cases
the ECU controlled the
RPM until the coolant
reached a certain
temperature> 1670 m > 1670 m > 1670 m
< -1 °C
19
ROAD TO LAB CORRELATION
Highway
FTP and City
Real World Cycle
LA92
Downhill
Uphill
SRC
US06
Accels
NOx vs CO2 (g/mi) for
a variety of drive
cycles for on-road and
on-dyno
2013 Jeep Wrangler
▪ 3.6L V6
▪ T2B4: 0.04g/mi NOx
Similar emissions are
measured within the
standards for both on-
road and on-dyno
cycles
Simulated road-grade
for on-dyno cycles
20
ROAD TO LAB CORRELATION
12mg/mi Average
(±3mg/mi St.Dev)
18.2mpg Average
(±0.5mpg St.Dev)
50mg/mi Average
(±6mg/mi St.Dev)
21mpg Average
(±0.4mpg St.Dev)
21
ROAD TO LAB CORRELATION
Discrepancy in CO
emissions between
on-road and on-dyno
10x greater emissions
on-dyno
PEMS also captures
the excess CO
emissions on-dyno
On-road
On-dyno
22
ROAD TO LAB CORRELATION
Significant high-
throttle events on-
dyno produce excess
CO emissions not
present on-roadExcess CO emissions
Significant high-throttle events
23
PSEUDO IN-USE PEMS ROUTES FOR RDE
American
WLTP
DurationStop
DurationDistance p_stop v_max
v_ave w/o
stops
v_ave w/
stopsa_min a_max
s s miles mi/h mi/h mi/h m/s² m/s²
Low 589 156 1.9 26.50% 35.1 16.0 11.7 -1.47 1.47
Middle 433 48 3.0 11.10% 47.6 27.7 24.5 -1.49 1.57
High 455 31 4.4 6.80% 60.5 37.8 35.2 -1.49 1.58
Extra-High 323 7 5.1 2.20% 81.6 58.4 57.2 -1.21 1.03
Total 1800 242 14.5 81.6 28.9
Phase
PEMS route
IUVP
DurationStop
DurationDistance p_stop v_max
v_ave w/o
stops
v_ave w/
stopsa_min a_max
s s miles mi/h mi/h mi/h m/s² m/s²
Low 471 - 1.8 - 25.5 - 7.3 -2.361 2.0809
Middle 259 - 2.1 - 41.0 - 15.3 -1.944 2.3611
High 591 - 5.2 - 63.4 - 21.9 -2.639 3.1944
Extra-High 738 - 7.5 - 70.2 - 35.5 -2.5 2.6389
Total 2059 16.6 70.2 29.3
Phase
Urban Rural Motorway
% % %
Low 100 0 0
Middle 58.9 41.1 0
High 23 55.5 21.5
Extra-High 14.4 18.1 67.5
Whole Trip 32.4 30.6 37
Phase
24
PSEUDO IN-USE PEMS ROUTES FOR RDE
Low
Middle
HighExtra
High
25
PSEUDO IN-USE PEMS ROUTES FOR RDE
On-road NOx
emissions for gasoline
vehicles were at or
below their respective
standard.
On-road NOx
emissions for the
diesel vehicle were 4-
5x greater than its
respective standard
(200 mg/mi)
26
PSEUDO IN-USE PEMS ROUTES FOR RDE
NOx emissions from
gasoline combustion were
more sensitive to higher
altitude conditions when
compared to route selection
▪ 2 tests were repeated in
reverse order for the F150
with minimal change in
NOx emissions.
▪ 4 different routes with
different trip shares were
driven for the Wrangler with
no significant change in
NOx emissions
On-road NOx emissions
from diesel combustion
were much higher relative to
the emission standard
regardless of route selection
Different Routes Reverse Order RWC & BreakdownRDE
27
CASE STUDY:
PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR LIGHT DUTY VEHICLE
PERFORMANCEChassis Dyno Testing
On-Road Testing
PEMS provides laboratory-grade fuel consumption and emissions
data but may not be practical for testing all fleet vehicles over long
duration test campaigns
SGS has used “machine learning” to determine if vehicle
performance can be learned in the chassis dyno lab and then used
to predict on-road fuel consumption and emissions
MY 2013 Jeep Wrangler, 3.6L V6, PFI, EPA T2B4, no MAF
• On Dyno: 122 micro trips, 3.1 hours of operation
• On Road: 93 micro trips, 3.8 hours of operation
Predictions were compared to measurements from AVL 493
MOVES
28
LDV FUEL ECONOMY PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING
The range of engine operation on-dyno was similar
to on-road tests
Micro Trip R2 = 0.972
Good fuel economy predictions were achieved,
and were more accurate than “OBD dongle”
estimates (not shown)
29
LDV EMISSIONS PREDICTION USING MACHINE LEARNING
Vehicle Specific Power bins were used to compare overall emissions rates
The predictions showed potential to faithfully represent the real-world emissions rate
distribution by Vehicle Specific Power operating mode
More explanatory data would improve predictions at the highest power conditions