pb-free alloy proliferation project kick-offthor.inemi.org/.../pb-free_alloys_aug08.pdf · pb-free...
TRANSCRIPT
Pb-Free Alloy Alternatives
Project Report: State of the
Industry
Chair: Greg Henshall, HP
Co-Chair: Stephen Tisdale, Intel
Aug 21, 2008
11
Project Team Members
16 companies; 44 individuals
Solder alloy suppliers, component suppliers, EMS providers, OEMs
2
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
3
Near-eutectic SAC allowed industry to meet RoHS
deadline of July 1, 2006
• The electronics industry adopted SAC 305 & other “near eutectic” alloys as the standard Pb-free alloys during the RoHS transition.
• These alloys were selected by industry consortia, balancing many factors.
• Major factors were the relatively low melting point and reasonable thermal fatigue reliability.
• These alloys were selected prior to understanding of impact on mechanical robustness and copper erosion.
4
SAC305/405 functional but not the
optimal Pb-free solution
Problems with SAC305/405 include:
• Poor drop/shock performance for
BGAs, especially on Ni/Au surfaces
• Expense of Ag is driving the desire to
reduce Ag content
– Wave solder bar main concern
– $16.25 - $17.50 per oz in June ‟08
(Tin ~ $0.62 per oz)
• Poor barrel fill on thick boards for
some surface finishes
• Copper dissolution
• Hot tearing and other surface
phenomena create inspection issues &
possibly unnecessary rework Ni
Cu
Solder
IMC
Fracture surface showing intermetallic layer left, no solder
5
Addressing issues using alloy alternatives
After K. Sweatman, Nihon Superior, 2008
6
The number of Pb-free alloy choices is expanding…
Wide range of alloy choices is both an opportunity and a risk.
Alloys Investigators Reference
Sn4.0Ag0.05Cu (SAC405) Pandher (Cookson), H.Kim & D. Kim (Intel), Kobayashi (Nippon
Steel), Darveaux (Amkor/ASU)
ECTC 2007
Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu (SAC305) Pandher (Cookson), Syed (Amkor), Kobayashi (Nippon Steel),
Darveaux (Amkor/ASU)
ECTC 2007
Sn1.0Ag0.5Cu (SAC105) Pandher (Cookson), H.Kim & D.Kim (Intel), Syed (Amkor),
Kobayashi (Nippon Steel)
ECTC 2007
Sn0.3Ag0.7Cu+Bi (SACX0307) Pandher (Cookson) ECTC 2007
Sn0.3Ag0.7Cu+Bi+Ni+Cr Pandher (Cookson) ECTC 2007
SAC305+0.05Ni+0.5In Syed (Amkor) ECTC 2007
SAC255+0.5Co Syed (Amkor) ECTC 2007
SAC107+0.5Ge Syed (Amkor) ECTC 2007
SAC125+0.05-0.5Ni (LF35) Syed (Amkor), D.Kim (Intel), Kobayashi (Nippon Steel),
Darveaux (Amkor/ASU)
ECTC 2007
SAC101+0.02Ni+0.05In Syed (Amkor) ECTC 2007
Sn-3.5Ag Cavasin (AMD), Darveaux (Amkor/ASU) ECTC 2007
Sn-3.5Ag+0.05-0.25La Pei & Qu (Ga. Tech) ECTC 2007
Sn-0.7Cu Darveaux (Amkor/ASU) ECTC 2007
Sn0-4Ag0.5Cu+Al+Ni Huang (Indium) ECTC 2007
Sn0.7Cu0.05Ni+Ge (SN100C) Sweatman, Miyaoka, Seki, Suenaga, Nishimura (Nihon Superior) ICS&R Toronto 2008
Slide 6
7
Situational Analysis (1 of 2)
• Perceived needs of high volume consumer segment is a key
driver for use of new alloys. These needs don‟t necessarily
match those of low volume, “high reliability” segment.
• Many “high reliability” OEMs have not switched to Pb-free
technology and have rigorous requirements for evaluation and
qualification of Pb-free materials & processes
• BGA package suppliers want to minimize the number of alloys
they have to deal with while still meeting customer needs
• Acceptability of alternate alloys will vary from product class to
product class, and possibly from company to company
• Various alloys behave differently during soldering processes and
in service. This adds complexity & risk to the supply chain
• OEMs and EMS suppliers cannot stop solder & component
suppliers from innovating and bringing new alloys to market
8
Situational Analysis (2 of 2)• New alloys:
– May provide improvements over the long run
– Are a natural part of Pb-free technology maturing
• iNEMI cannot dictate a solution
• The industry is currently very active in performing technical
investigations of various alloys. Some information is proprietary
but more and more information is becoming publicly available
• In making alloy choices the industry will consider a wider range
of alloy properties and the performance of the alloy in a wider
range of situations than it did in the first round of lead-free alloy
selection
• The market will ultimately decide which alloy or alloys “win”
• The best way to handle alloy proliferation in the near term is to
provide industry guidance on how to manage through the
issues/concerns, not to define alloys that are acceptable or
unacceptable
99
(1) Help manage the supply chain complexity created by alloy choices
(2) Address reliability concerns
(3) Highlight the opportunities & risks created by the new Pb-free alloy
alternatives.
Specific goals in Phase 1 include:
• Assess existing knowledge and identify critical gaps related to new
Pb-free alloys. Provide technical information to the industry that will
make selection and management of alloys easier.
• Raise awareness of this information through publication and
presentation of findings.
• Work with industry standards bodies (e.g. IPC, JEDEC) to address
standards that require updating to account for new alloys.
• Use findings to drive follow-on work, if required, in Phase 2.
Pb-Free Alloy Alternatives Project Objectives
10
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
11
Initial assessment of SAC alloys was limited.
Near-eutectic SAC alloys (SAC405, SAC387, SAC305, etc.)
Assessed On
• Melting point
• Wetting rate
• Spread
• Reflow soldering
• Joint microstructure
• Thermal cycling of reflowed test
assembly (0-100°C, 10 minute
dwells)
• Thermal shock of reflowed test
assembly (-40-125°C, 5 minute
dwells)
• Cross-sectioning after thermal
cycling
Not Assessed On
• Aggressiveness towards copper
(copper dissolution)
• Aggressiveness towards stainless
steel (solder pot erosion)
• Reliability in shock loading
(e.g. drop test)
• Wave soldering
• Selective soldering
• Hand soldering
• Rework
12
Problems with high silver SAC alloys and possible solutions
Problem
Reduce or
Remove
Silver
Micro-
AlloyOther Solutions
High Flow Stress X X
Brittle Joint Failure X X
Low Impact Strength X X
Shrinkage Defects X XMove Closer to
Eutectic
Composition
Copper Erosion X X
Cost X
13
Knowledge about new alloys is evolving
• Considerable research has been performed
on the new alloys
• Some commonly investigated elements for
microalloying are nickel (Ni), bismuth (Bi),
phosphorus (P), germanium (Ge), cobalt
(Co), indium (In), and chromium (Cr), with
several already being used commercially
• Some elements selectively incorporate into
the interfacial intermetallic layer to:
– (1) control the IMC thickness
– (2) slow the growth of the IMC in service
– (3) modify its morphology
– (4) prevent disruptive phase changes
– (5) increase toughness
• Some microalloy additions go into solid
solution within the tin matrix to increase
both strength and ductility, and thus
reliability, while others control oxidation
• More knowledge is needed in
some areas
– Impacts of thermal aging
– Thermal fatigue impact of Ag,
microalloy additions
– Range of effectiveness for
some alloy additions
Ni
After K. Sweatman, Nihon Superior, 2008
14
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
15
Studies consistently show that low Ag alloys perform better
in drop/shock than high Ag alloys.
D. Kim, et al. (Intel)
LF35 = Sn1.2Ag0.5Cu+Ni
A. Syed, et al. (Amkor)
SAC 305
1% AgAlloys
16
Micro alloying additions improve drop/shock
performance in most studies.
• Improved performance from dopants also seen in data of H. Kim et al. (Intel) on
previous slide (LF35 vs SAC 105).
• Only Syed et al. (Amkor) did not observe a clear improvement in drop/shock
performance in low Ag alloys with dopants compared to similar non-doped alloys –
depending on surface finish.
Data of Pandher et al. (Cookson)
SACX =Sn0.3Ag0.7Cu0 +Bi
0.1% Ni
No Ni
0.03% Cr
No Cr
17
Various reasons cited for improved drop/shock behavior of
micro alloys & low Ag alloys.
• Pandher, et al. (Cookson).
– Micro alloying additions slow inter
diffusion, thus reducing IMC
thickness or propensity for void
formation.
– Small amounts of Ni can decrease
Cu3Sn growth, improving reliability.
– Low Ag stated to decrease strength &
modulus, transferring less stress to
the solder/substrate interface.
• H. Kim et al. (Intel), and D. Kim et al. (Intel).
– Low modulus and low yield strength
improve performance of solder joints
with low Ag alloys.
– Optimization of these properties
requires increasing the amount of
primary Sn relative to the Ag3Sn and
Cu6Sn5 phases in the alloy.
18
Tin-Copper Phase Diagram
Phase transformation from
hexagonal Cu6Sn5 to
monoclinic Cu6Sn5‟
with a 26% volume
change
Nickel stabilizes the
hexagonal close
packed form of the
Cu6Sn5 ensuring the
integrity of the
intermetallic layer
Possible explanation for effect of Ni -
Stabilisation of η Hexagonal Close Packed Cu6Sn5 (1 of 2)
K. Nogita & T. Nishimura,
Scripta Materialia 59, 2
(2008) 191-194.
19
Electron
Diffraction Pattern
Electron
Diffraction Pattern
Transmission
Electron Micrograph
Transmission
Electron Micrograph
~9% Ni
in IMC
Possible explanation for effect of Ni -
Stabilisation of η Hexagonal Close Packed Cu6Sn5 (2 of 2)
20
Reducing Ag content and micro alloy additions can change
failure mode of SAC solder joints.
• H. Kim et al. (Intel). The majority of cracking in SAC 405 solders was
through the IMC layer (package side). Cracking in the SAC 105 joints was
more complex, with cracks going through the bulk solder near the IMC layer
and in the IMC.
Crack in IMC layer Note: Pandher et al.
(Cookson) found that when small amounts of Cr & Ni are combined in low Ag alloys (e.g. SACX), the occurrence of flat, brittle fractures (Mode 4) are reduced 80%.
Crack in solder
near IMC
SAC405
SAC105
21
Drop/shock performance depends on pad finish (Ni/Au vs Cu)
Data of Tanakaet al., ECTC 2006
SAC305SAC305
SAC125+Ni
Dro
ps
to F
ailu
re
SAC125+Ni
• Studies by Syed et al. (Amkor) showed that SAC 125 + Ni does not produce a
significant drop/shock performance improvement over SAC 305 for Ni/Au
package finish. However, this alloy is the best performer for Cu-OSP package
finish.
– PCB finish was Cu-OSP in both cases.
• Other literature data indicate this dependence of drop performance on pad finish.
22
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
23
Accelerated thermal cycle performance not sensitive to
Ag content in the range 2.1% to 3.8% - data of Kang et al.
Average failure life (N50) estimated from ATC failure data of SAC BGA solder joints.
Data of Kang et al., ECTC, p. 661 (2004).
• No systematic change in life as afunction of Ag content
• Differences in life are small and may even be within experimentalerror.
Possible reasons the differences in life are
small include:
1. There is no significant difference in the
microstructure over the range of Ag contents
2. The component/substrate configuration
may not have subjected joints to high strain
24
Lead-Free and Mixed Assembly Solder Joint Reliability Trends- J-P Clech
IPC Printed Circuits Expo SMEMA Council APEX Designer Summit O4
Hard solder
gives better
service than
soft solder
Soft solder gives
better service than
hard solder
Analysis by Clech may provide an explanation of at least some of the
apparent conflict in reliability data – influence of strain range.
Sn-0.7Cu
SAC
25
Large changes in Ag content can have significant impact on
ATC reliability – Data of Terashima et al.
S. Terashima, et al., J. Elec. Mater., Vol. 32, No. 12, p.1527 (2003).
• Thermal fatigue reliability
appears to be dependent on
process and microstructure and
those dependencies have yet to
be characterized fully and
understood
– Terashima surmised that higher Ag
content inhibited microstructural
coarsening and prolonged fatigue
life. The microstructural coarsening
hypothesis is consistent with results
of Kang.
– However, Terashima reported better
reliability in the high Ag alloy,
whereas Kang reported coarser
structures and better reliability in the
low Ag alloy.
• Performance relative to eutectic
Sn-Pb not reported
26
Limited study on the impact of microalloy
additions on thermal fatigue performance
Data of Pandher and Healey, ECTC 2008
• SACX (Sn-0.3Ag-0.7Cu+Bi) shows improved performance
in temperature cycling.
– Bi addition refines grains
27
Darveaux and Reichman (ECTC 2007) used their mechanical
property data to simulate hysteresis loops & discuss
possible impact on reliability.
• Simulations of cyclic hysteresis loops for various alloys. The authors conclude
that the acceleration factor will vary by alloy.
28
Summary - Thermal fatigue resistance of new alloys is a
clear gap issue.
• ATC evaluations have focused on the
“high-reliability alloys,” SAC 405 and 305
and little data exist for lower Ag alloys
• Only a small number of studies address
the impact of alloy composition on life
during accelerated thermal cycle testing
(ATC)
– Data sometimes conflicting
• The performance of low Ag alloys relative
to eutectic Sn-Pb is not clear, especially
under field use conditions
• The impact of microalloy additions is
largely unknown
• Structure-property relationships have not
been defined
• The impact of significant alloy changes on
the acceleration factor that relates field
life to accelerated test life is unknown
Overall, the impact of ball alloy
composition on thermal fatigue life
in the field is difficult to judge at
this time.
29
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
30
PCA manufacturing & reliability can be affected by the choice
of ball alloy.
Incomplete solder joint formation for a 1% Ag ball alloy assembled at the low end of typical Pb-free reflow process window.(Images courtesy of Hewlett-Packard Co.)
Unmelted solder ball
Unacceptable solder joints
CSP Package
CSP Package
PCB
PCB
• Low Ag BGA ball alloy may have an impact on PCA manufacturing due to high melting point (>225°C)
– Note: Because of their behavior in the molten state and their solidification behavior some alternative alloys require less superheat than others.
• The change to low Ag alloys in BGA balls may require a change to PCA manufacturing processes.
– Assembly and repair facilities can have unexpected yield losses due to low Ag alloys if they are not aware of their presence.
• Improperly soldered low Ag joints are a significant reliability risk because they may pass electrical test but still have unacceptable solder joints and unmelted regions.
31
• For non-eutectic compositions with a pasty range of greater than 10°C:
– Directional solidification resulting from temperature gradient across the solder joint
– Non-uniform microstructure
– Low melt phase accumulation at the board pad or component pad interface
– Contamination and defect accumulation at the board pad or component pad interface
• Although primarily an issue for backwards compatibility, to some degree this applies equally to SAC105/SAC105 or SAC105/SAC305 assemblies
• Some new alloys are designed to mitigate these concerns by use of microalloying additions that force eutectic behavior
– Single stage solidification with no pro-eutectic phases.
31
Low Ag Alloy/SnPb – Microstructure Formation
P.Snugovsky, et al., “Microstructure, Defects, and Reliability of Mixed Pb Free / SnPb Assemblies,”
Proceedings TMS, V 1: Materials Processing and Properties p.p. 631- 642, 2008
3232
Low Ag Alloy/SnPb – Microstructure Formation
• Pasty range comparison for solder joints formed on Cu pad:
– Pure SAC305 – 5°C
– Pure SAC105 – 12°C
– SAC405/SnPb – 30°C
– SAC105/SnPb – 40°C (40°C+ with additives)
SAC305/SnPbPure SAC305 SAC105/SnPb
P.Snugovsky, et al., “Microstructure, Defects, and Reliability of Mixed Pb Free / SnPb Assemblies,”
Proceedings TMS, V 1: Materials Processing and Properties p.p. 631- 642, 2008
3333
Low Ag Alloy/SnPb – Rework Defects
Situation exacerbated during repair due to greater directional heating
of component from rework nozzle:
– Significant formation of shrinkage voids and coalescence of impurities and
low melt eutectic at component pad
– Difficult to avoid especially if the board is thick and/or component is large
– Defect cannot be detected electrically
P.Snugovsky, et al., “Microstructure, Defects, and Reliability of Mixed Pb Free / SnPb Assemblies,”
Proceedings TMS, V 1: Materials Processing and Properties p.p. 631- 642, 2008
34
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
35
Current Knowledge / Gaps (1 of 3)
Areas where knowledge is relatively complete
See Backup
Slide
Sufficient Knowledge
Low Ag alloys improve drop/shock resistance
Micro alloy additions significantly improve drop/shock
performance on Cu surfaces but not on Ni surfaces
Decreasing Ag content decreases elastic modulus, yield and
tensile strength of SAC
Decreasing Ag content decreases creep strength of SAC
Alloy additions can increase the creep strength of low Ag
SAC alloys
SAC alloys are not inherently brittle (though high strength
and stiffness can lead to overall brittleness of the joint)
36
Current Knowledge / Gaps (2 of 3)
High priority gap areas
Gap or Concern
High Priority
Advantages and disadvantages of specific alloys
Composition limits for microalloy additions; ranges of
effectiveness
Standard method to assess new alloys; standard data
requirements
Consistency of testing methods, including test
vehicles & assembly, test parameters, etc.
Establish the microstructural characteristics of
specific alloys
Long term reliability data for new alloys, particularly
low Ag & microalloyed
Lack of thermal cycle data for evaluating new alloys;
benchmark to Sn-Pb and SAC 305/405
37
Current Knowledge / Gaps (3 of 3)
Medium and
low priority
gap areas
Gap or Concern
Medium Priority
Assessment of new alloys for use in "mission critical,
long life" products
Impact of rework on microstructure and properties
Mixed Sn-Pb/Pb-free assembly, including rework
Impact of alloy composition on work hardening rates
& other flow properties; effect of strain rate and
temperature
Impact of alloy composition on bend/flex limits
(moderate strain rate; ICT, handling, card insertion,
etc.)
Thermal fatigue accelerations factors (not yet fully
established for SAC 305/405)
Impact of aging on microstructure and mechanical
propertiesLow Priority
Solder process margins required for new alloys used
in various product classifications
Mixing of different BGA ball alloys and paste alloys
for various component and board designs
38
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
39
Management of alloy choice presents challenges for
large OEMs
• Product portfolios can be broad– Reliability in one product line can
impact sales in others.
• Supply chains are very complicated– Business models range from
no-touch to in-house design.
• Assurance of supply concern if only one patented material with limited licensees.
• Management of multiple alloys, even at a single factory site, is complicated.– Product support and repair
becomes more complex.
• Part number change for BGA/CSP components switching from high Ag to low Ag ball alloy (mfg. process impact).
40
Standards need updating to account for new alloys
• J-STD-006 “Requirements for Electronic Grade Solder Alloys … ”
– Alloy Team members participated in meeting at APEX „08 to address
concerns with new alloys, especially those with dopants
• J-STD-609 (component, PCA material labeling)
– Alloy Team presentation of issue made at JEDEC JC-14 meeting
Jan ‟08
– Began addressing issue with IPC/JEDEC task group at APEX „08
• Part numbers for BGAs; customer notifications
– Alloy Team presentation of issue made at JEDEC JC-14 meeting
Jan ‟08
– JC-14.4 chairman has established a task group including Alloy Team
members; 1st meeting took place early April & efforts continue
41
Impact of BGA ball alloy change on component part
numbers for alloys inducing a mfg process change.
• Change in alloy is a change in fit to process (form, fit or function).
• EMSF & iNEMI statement from May 2007 calling for “Unique Part Numbers to Differentiate Ball Metallurgies on Pb-Free BGA Components”
– Mike Davisson, RoHS technical program manager for Agilent: "A change in metallurgy without the ability to track the change through MPNs will only make Pb-free conversion more difficult and could delay the process.”
– iNEMI members supporting this position include: 3M, Agilent Technologies Inc., Alcatel-Lucent, Analogic, Celestica Inc., Delphi Electronics & Safety, Hewlett-Packard Company, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Intel Corporation, Jabil Circuit Inc., Microsoft Corp., Micro Systems Engineering Inc., Nihon Superior, Plexus Corp., Sanmina-SCI Corporation, Solectron Corporation and Tyco Electronics Corporation.
42
Defined information requirements needed to increase
acceptance and reduce risks of using new alloys
• The lack of defined information requirements for alloy acceptance:
– Creates uncertainty (fear) in the industry regarding new alloys
– Slows the adoption of improved materials
• The acceptability of any alloy may vary from product class to product class, and possibly from company to company. However, the methodology and data requirements may be largely same.
• HP is developing a systematic methodology for alloy assessment (SMTAI, Aug ’08)
– Data needed to make assessment of alloy acceptability
– Common/standard test methods, parameters, test vehicles
– Controls for comparison with historical and currently accepted alloys
– Allows direct comparisons between different alloys (“apples to apples”)
• iNEMI Alloy Alternatives project plans to use this as a starting point and push for industry acceptance & standardization
43
HP alternate alloy data requirements -
overviewNon-technical• Complete alloy composition*• Microalloy benefit range *• Trade names*• Test labs*• Patent status• Submitter‟s licensing status• Cost of one kg • Target application(s)• Target implementation date• Advantages over SAC305
Reliability• Thermal cycling*• Mechanical shock*• Vibration*• Four-point bend*• Physical samples *• Alloy cross-compatibility with SAC305 *
Material properties• Solidus temperature*• Liquidus temperature*• DSC or DMA curve*• Electrical conductivity• Thermal conductivity• Density• Expansion vs temperature, TCE• Young‟s modulus (dynamic)• Yield strength (0.2%)• UTS• Elongation• Stress strain curves• Poisson‟s ratio• Hardness• Literature search• Contamination reports
Manufacturing• HP DOE for wave pot temperatures*• HP DOE for reflow profiles*• Laminate damage assessment*
• Pastes must meet HP Solder Paste
Specification *• Wetting balance
* required
44
Standard test methods and controls
• In order to properly compare data from various sources and for
multiple alloys, standard test methods are required.
– Details are important
• Generally follow IPC-9701A; exceptions provided (mostly to simplify)
• Test vehicle design
– Components (ball alloy, component type, size, etc.)
– PCBs (thickness, layer count, materials, finish, etc.)
– Board assembly (solder alloy/paste, reflow profile, etc.)
– Controls (SAC305 and eutectic Sn-Pb)
• Test details
– Thermal cycle profile, # parts, preconditioning, failure criterion, etc.
• Reporting requirements
– Tabulated failure data, Weibull curves
• Controls: Sn-Pb, SAC305
Example for Accelerated Thermal Cycling (ATC)
45
Outline
• Background and Objectives
• Considerations in Alloy Selection
• Knowledge Assessment
– Mechanical Shock
– Thermal Fatigue
– Manufacturability
– Gaps
• Managing Alloy Change
• Summary and Conclusions
46
Summary and Conclusions (3 of 3)
The knowledge assessment efforts of the iNEMI Alloy
Alternatives team have been described. This multi-company,
multi-sector team has assessed the recent literature
regarding new Pb-free solder alloys alternatives and come
to the following conclusions.
1. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the
fundamental relationships between alloying elements and
properties for the SAC family of new Pb free solders.
Additional work is needed to fully characterize the complex
microstructures and their influence on physical and
mechanical properties.
47
Summary and Conclusions (2 of 3)
2. Areas where the performance of new alloys is reasonably
well established have been identified. Some of these
include: (i) impact of Ag content and microalloy additions on
mechanical shock reliability; (ii) impact of Ag content on
elastic stiffness, plastic flow and creep behavior of SAC
alloys.
3. Areas where more knowledge is needed in order to properly
assess the benefits and potential risks of new alloys also
have been identified. Some of these include: (i) thermal
fatigue performance, including the impact of microalloy
additions and development of acceleration models; (ii) the
impact of alloy composition on the full range of solder
processes; (iii) impact of thermal aging on microstructure
and properties; (iv) impact of composition on bend/flex
limits related to PCA manufacturing, test, board handling,
etc.
48
Summary and Conclusions (3 of 3)
4. Standardized data requirements for assessment of new
alloys are needed so that each company can compare alloy
performance with product requirements over the full range
of relevant properties. The iNEMI Alloy Alternatives team is
currently considering the HP approach as a starting point
for such standardization.
5. The iNEMI Alloy Alternatives team is actively engaged with
relevant standards bodies to create or update industry
standards related to new Pb-free solder alloys.
49
Backup Slides
50
η‟- η Cu6Sn5,
Heated/cooled at 1°C/min *
Ni-stabilized η (Cu,Ni)6Sn5,
Heated/cooled at 1°C/min**
*Fig4 (b) from G. Ghosh and M. Asta: Journal of Materials Research, 20(2005) 3102-3117.
Ni Stabilisation of η Hexagonal Close Packed Cu6Sn5
η‟-
Cu6Sn5
η
Cu6Sn5
438±18 J/mol 186°C
** (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 taken from Sn0.7Cu0.05Ni alloy,
DSC by Nihon Superior Co. Ltd.
No phase transformation
Transformation from
hexagonal to monoclinic
Hexagonal form retained
at room temperature
„K. Nogita and T. Nishimura, Scripta Materialia 59, 2 (2008) 191-194.‟
Supplement to Slide 17-3
1. Ni segregates to the eutectic Cu6Sn5 phase
2. Ni is relatively homogeneously distributed in the eutectic Cu6Sn5
Synchrotron micro-XRF element mapping
of Cu6Sn5 phase formed in Sn-0.7Cu-0.05Ni
T. Ventura, C.M. Gourlay, K. Nogita, T. Nishimura, M. Rappaz, A.K. Dahle,
Journal of Electronic Materials, 37, 1 (2008) 32-39.
Ni Stabilisation of η Hexagonal Close Packed Cu6Sn5
Supplement to Slide 17-4
52
OSP Substrate
After 2 reflow cycles and
500 hour @ 125°C
Sn-0.7Cu-0.05Ni
SAC305
Cracking of IMC due to
phase change on cooling
Crack-free IMC
stabilized by Ni
Ni Stabilisation of η Hexagonal Close Packed Cu6Sn5
Supplement to Slide 17-5
53
SAC alloys, both high and low Ag, are NOT “brittle”
• Ductility measured by Kim et al. for all SAC alloys is high
• Huang et al. observed elongations to failure in the range of 12% to 20% for a wide
variety of SAC & SAC+Al/Ni alloys.
• SAC solders are elastically stiff (high modulus) and strong (high YS, UTS).
• Solder joints may exhibit brittle fracture due to high stress imposed in IMC layers,
PCB laminate, etc. Fracture does not take place in the solder.
D. Kim et al., ECTC 2007.
Also note: Modulus decreases as Ag concentration decreases.(Also observed by Huang et al. (Indium)).
• ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary defines “brittle” as: “Permitting little or no
plastic (permanent) deformation prior to fracture.” Elongation to failure ~ 0%.