patent trends in printed electronics and printed tags · (eas w/1 tag or electronic article...
TRANSCRIPT
Abstract— Printed electronics (PE) refers to the application of
various printing techniques for the fabrication of electronic circuits
and devices. This emerging discipline promises to revolutionize the
field of electronics and provides an extension to conventional
electronics by enabling the mass production of low cost, flexible
digital devices in a wide array of substrates, such as textiles, paper,
or plastic. Printed Tags are the best examples of this technology
which can provides a promising potential pathway toward the
realization of ultra low-cost Intelligent tags which can be used for
the purposes such as item-level tracking. For the past two decades
there has been considerable research and development activity and
business interests in this promising technology. As for any
technology, knowledge created is in the form of Publications and
Patents. A technology life cycle (TLC) for a specific technology
based on Patent data helps to determine the present state of
technology in its life cycle, which will act as the basis on which
decisions regarding how to proceed with further business
investments and technological advancement can be made. In this
work in order to retrieve the patent registration data in various
patent databases, we build a query system on the basis of which we
determine and trace yearly patent registration record in the field of
Printed Electronics. This information will be useful to understand
the present state of the Technologies under consideration.
Keywords— Printed Electronics, Printed Tags, USPTO, WIPO,
Worldwide Patent Database, Technology Life Cycle, S Curve,
USPTO Classes.
I. INTRODUCTION
RINTED electronics has emerged as a potential
technology for many cost effective and large area
applications as in tags, displays, sensors, OLED’s and
photovoltaic’s. This technology is currently experiencing a
growing interest and garnering attention in both academic
and industrial aspects of Research and Development. Digital
Devices produced by Printed Electronics provide two
principle advantages over Conventional Electronics, firstly
they can be fabricated at Low Temperature and allow simple
integrated circuits to be fabricated at extremely low cost for
various large area applications such as radio-frequency
identification tags, In a similar fashion like printing on paper
they can be used to “print” disposable Electronics Circuits.
1Manipal Technologies Limited, Manipal, India
2Industrial and Management Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Kanpur, India 3National Centre for Flexible Electronics, Indian Institute of
Technology Kanpur, India *Corresponding author’s e-mail: [email protected]
Similar to the bunch of potential Printed Electronics
products, Passive Printed Tags have applications in diverse
areas like asset management, monitoring, identifying and
tracking of people especially in work environments such as
military bases, power plants, airports, hospitals, refineries and
access restricted areas is emerging. The necessity for human
moment monitoring by tagging is emerging, where the tag
will be external to the body. This kind of application requires
bulky wrist bands or ID badges, which can be printed [1].
During day to day operations Tags are expected to lead to
Improvements in automation, inventory control, and
checkout/purchasing operations [2]. Thereby Printed
electronics holds promise for realizing ultra low cost Printed
Tags.
Based on the importance of printed electronics and Printed
Tags there has been incremental growth in Research and
Development in this sector. However, research so far has paid
very little attention to determine the nature of evolution of
this technology and the trends emerging [3].
A patent is used as a proxy for technology or knowledge
itself [6]. Broadly patents are accepted as a quantitative
measure of the performance of investment in research and
development (R&D) [4]. Using patent data there have been
lots of studies on the performance of technological
innovation. For the inception of any such studies there is
requirement to determine the Number of patents being filed
for the entire technology [5]. Further investments in an
Innovative Technology are done on the basis of the stage in
which a particular technology is in the technology life cycle
(TLC). Patent data can be used to predict the success and the
present state of technology [6]. During formulating strategy
for technical collaborations and investments, it is critical to
know the countries and current assignees which are holding
the highest number of patents in the field of interest. We will
showcase these aspects for Printed Electronics Technology.
II. PATENT DATABASES
Patent provide the legal rights to Inventor within the
geographical area in which a patent is filed. Therefore a
Inventor will file a patent in the countries in which Inventor
determines his Intellectual knowledge will be useful and can
have commercial viability. All the patents for a are not filed
in one particular patent database. To understand the
Technological Evolution it is important to consider various
patent databases.
For the purpose of Patent retrieval and analysis we have
used lexis nexis total patent database
(https://www.lexisnexis.com/totalpatent/signonForm.do). We
Patent Trends in Printed Electronics and Printed
Tags
Basanagouda B. Patil1,2,3
, Shashi Shekhar Mishra2, and Y. N. Mohapatra
3
P
International Journal of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (IJCSEE) Volume 4, Issue 1 (2016) ISSN 2320–4028 (Online)
21
have segregated patent databases into USPTO (United States
Patent and Trademark Office), WIPO (World Intellectual
Property Organization) and Worldwide Patent Data Bases
(Includes all the major Patent Granting agencies of the
world). We trace the number of patents that are filed for both
Printed Electronics Technology and Printed Tags in all these
patent data bases. During the process of our search we have
considered both the granted and assigned patents, along with
removing family member duplicates.
III. TECHNOLOGICAL LIFE CYCLE (GROWTH CURVE)
A patent growth curve as depicted in Fig.1 is an empirical
model which helps to determine the present stage of
technological evolution. It is obtained by plotting number of
patents filed with respect to time based on historical data [6].
SaturationGrowth
IIII
Accu
mu
late
d n
um
ber
of
pate
nts
Time
II
Initiation
Fig. 1 S-curve of TLC [6], where regions I, II and III represent the
initiation, growth and saturation stages, respectively.
IV. PATENT TRENDS IN PRINTED ELECTRONICS
We have identified trends in the number of patents filed
and granted in printed electronics at USPTO, WIPO and
Worldwide Patent Data Base. Previously there has been
efforts on similar lines by [6] but they have considered very
basic aspects of PE Technology and their query was restricted
to very few potential products of the Technology and was
limited to the year 2012, after which we have noticed there
are considerable changes in the rate of patents filed.
Our Query as per table.1 is created based on expert opinion
and is concatenated with logical and between Printing
processes and the printed Products, which means all the
Patents noted in the bibliography include both (a) one of the
printing process among sheet to sheet , roll to roll , gravure
,offset, flexo, flexography, screen inkjet and (b) one of the
appreciable printable products among solar cell, filter, panel
display, printed circuit board, flat panel display, RFID tag,
diode, capacitor, TFT, circuit, memory, display, sensor.
TABLE I
PRINTED ELECTRONICS PATENT RETRIEVAL QUERY
(((sheet or "sheet to sheet" or "sheet-to-sheet") w/1 print) or ((roll or "roll to
roll" or "roll-to-roll") w/1 print) or ((gravure or offset) w/1 print) or ((flexo
w/1 print) or flexography) or (screen w/1 print) and (stencil or squeeze or
mesh) or (inkjet w/1 print) and (sylinge or cylinder or nozzle)) and ((((solar
w/1 cell or organic) or photovoltaic or OPV) and flexible) or
(((electromagnetic w/1 interference) or EMI) and (filter w/3 film) and
flexible) or (((panel w/1 display) or FPD) and (!flat) and flexible) or
((((radio w/1 frequency) w/1 identification) or RFID) and flexible) or
((flexible w/1 print) and (circuit and board)) or (FPCB) or (((((organic or
light) w/1 emitting) w/1 diode) or OLED) and flexible) or (RFID and
flexible)or (Tag and flexible) or (Diode and flexible) or (Capacitor and
flexible) or (TFT and flexible) or (circuit and flexible) or (memory and
flexible) or (display and flexible) or (sensor and Flexible)))
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Nu
mb
er
Of
Pate
nts
Year
USPTO
WIPO
World Wide
Patent Data Base
Fig. 2 Printed Electronics: Trends of Patents filed from 1975 to 2015
Number of patents filed as per Fig.2 follows the S Curve.
Observing the worldwide patent database it can be clearly
noticed that from 1975 to 1995 the pace of growth number of
patent filed was very minimal and the technology as per TLC
was in the R & D Stage, from 1995 to 2000 the transition
from stage.1 to stage.2 began to take place and leading to
growth in the pace of number of patents generated per year.
Further, the nature of growth from 2000 to 2015 can be
clearly observed from Fig.3. It is clear that the number of
patents filed form year 2000 to 2005 had a higher growth and
the technology was at the lower part of the Growth phased.
2004 to 2006 saw a rapid increase in the number of patents
filed and transition from lower part of growth phase to higher
part of growth phase too place. From 2006-2011, there was
considerable increase in the number of patents filed but the
rate of growth was less than previous five years duration. It
can be observed that from 2011 to 2015 number of patents
being filed is almost constant and give the sense that
transition from stage 2 to stage 3 has began. Similar
conclusions can be derived from USPTO and WIPO patent
bases but due to lesser number of patents filed in them, stage
of the TLC concluded by them need not be true for the whole
technology.
International Journal of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (IJCSEE) Volume 4, Issue 1 (2016) ISSN 2320–4028 (Online)
22
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Nu
mb
er
Of
Pate
nts
Year
USPTO
WIPO
World Wide
Patent Data Bases
Fig. 3 Printed Electronics: Trends of Patents filed from 1975 to 2015
V. PATENT TRENDS IN PRINTED TAGS
Large figures and tables may span both columns.
Printed Tags are the most widely Researched topic in the field
of Printed Electronics. However, there has been no
considerable effort to determine the state of the Technology of
the Printed Tags. Considering this Research gap we have
initiated the process of understanding the evolution of patent
specially pertaining to Printed Tags. To determine the same
as in section IV based on the expert opinion we have build the
query to determine the number of Printed Tags.
In the case of Printed Tags, in order to make the search
process more effective we have just considered patents which
have the chosen keywords in Title, abstracts or claims as
indicated in Table 2.
TABLE II
PRINTED ELECTRONICS PATENT RETRIEVAL QUERY
(((RFID or HF RFID or HF – RFID or UHF RFID or UHF – RFID or Radio
Frequency Identification) w/1 tag) or ((nfc or near field communication) w/1
tag) or (Temperature w/1 tag) or (Sensor w/1 tag) or (Packaging w/1 tag) or
(Ph w/1 tag) or (memory w/1 tag) or (active w/1 tag or passive w/1 tag) or
(EAS w/1 tag or Electronic Article Surveillance w/1 tag) or (printed w/1 tag)
or (organic w/1 tag)) and (flexible) and (printed)
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Nu
mb
er
of
pate
nts
Years
UPSTO
WIPO
World Wide
Patent Data Bases
Fig. 4 Printed Tags: Trends of Patents filed from 1975 to 2015
Number of patents filed as per Fig.4 follows the S Curve.
Observing the worldwide patent database it can be clearly
noticed that from 1975 to 2000 the pace of growth number of
patent filed was very minimal and the technology as per TLC
was in the R&D stage. From 2000 to 2003 the transition from
Stage.1 to Stage.2 began to take place and leading to growth
in the pace of number of patents generated per year. Further,
the nature of growth from 2003 to 2015 can be seen to in the
growing pace with varied pace.
2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Patents Evolution : Flexible and Printed Tags
Nu
mb
er
of
pate
nts
Year
UPSTO
WIPO
All Patent Data Base
Fig. 5 Printed Tags: Trends of Patents filed from 2000 to 2015
From Fig.5 It is clear that the number of patents filed,
registered significant growth form year 2003 to 2007.
Although the growth started again from 2012 to 2015, there
was a slump in the same from 2008 to 2012. Therefore the
Disruption which took place in the year 2008 are to be
determined which lead to such a regain in the pace of growth.
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Patent data serves as the basis to determine the present
state of a particular technology in the TLC. We traced the
Patents evolution from 1975 to 2015 in the field of Printed
Electronics Technology in general and Printed Tags in
particular. We could find that in terms of number of patents
field PE Technology as a whole as of 2015 is in onset of the
saturation whereas Printed Tags Technology is in the growth
Stage.
As part of future work one can forecast the number of
probable patents that can be filed in the near future. Also it
will be essentially to do technical analysis to find out certain
facts like reasons for decrease in the growth of patents in PE
from 2003 to 2007 and subsequent increase at the later stages.
PE Technology as a whole is at the onset of the saturation.
Therefore one can apply diffusion models such as Bass
diffusion model or its variants to determine the diffusion of
the sales, which will give directions to the investor to invest
in this particular technology.
International Journal of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (IJCSEE) Volume 4, Issue 1 (2016) ISSN 2320–4028 (Online)
23
VII. ACKNOWLEGEMENT
We are thankful to Mr. SK. Rafi, Mr. Amruth C, Mr.
Upkar K. Verma and Ms. Priyanka Sharma students at IIT
Kanpur, Mr. Malay Mishra IP Sales Specialist in LexisNexis
and Mr. Ravi Pandey from SIDBI-IIT Kanpur, for their
support.
REFERENCES
[1] V Sanchez-Romaguera, M. A. Ziai, D. Oyeka et al., “Towards Inkjet-
Printed Low Cost Passive UHF RFID Skin Mounted Tattoo Paper Tags
Based On Silver Nanoparticle Inks” J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 1, pp. 6395–
640, 2013.
[2] V. Subramanian, J. M. J. Fréchet, P. C. Chang et al., “Progress Toward
Development of All-Printed, RFID Tags: Materials, Processes, and
Devices”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 93, pp. 7, JULY 2005.
[3] Serkan Altuntas, Turkay Dereli, Andrew Kusiak et al., “Forecasting
technology success based on patent data”, Technological Forecasting &
Social Change, vol. 96, pp. 202–214, 2015.
[4] Misuk Lee, Kwangduk Kim, Youngsang Cho, “A study on the relationship
between technology diffusion and new product diffusion”, Technological
Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 77, pp. 796–802, June 2010.
[5] Janghyeok Yoon, Youngjin Park, Mujin Kim et al., “Tracing evolving
trends in printed electronics using patent information” J Nanopart. Res.,
vol. 16, pp. 2471, 2014.
[6] C. Y. Liu, J. C. Wang, “Forecasting the development of the biped robot
walking technique in Japan through S-curve model analysis”
Scientometrics, vol. 82, pp. 21-36, 2010.
International Journal of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering (IJCSEE) Volume 4, Issue 1 (2016) ISSN 2320–4028 (Online)
24