part 2.2 methology planning

Upload: eithu-thutun

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    1/90

    POST AND TELECOMMUNICATION INSTITUTE

    OF TECHNOLOGY

    PART 4

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING

    MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    2/90

    ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL PLANNING

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    3/90

    ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL PLANNING

    Activities of national planning includes two types of omestic

    overall planning for socioeconomic development and omestic

    overall planning for land utili!ation"

    omestic overall planning for socioeconomic development includes three

    types# those so" i$ %eneral planning for industry/&usiness development and

    after that is detail region/area planning for industry/&usiness development' ii$

    Region overall planning for socioeconomic development and after that is area

    overall planning for socioeconomic development' iii$ Region general

    construction planning and after that is area general construction planning

    omestic overall planning for land utili!ation and after that is region general

    planning for land utili!ation and after that is area general planning for land

    utili!ation

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    4/90

    ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    5/90

    GENERAL/DETAIL INDUSTRY/BUSINESS

    DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    6/90

    Industry/&usiness development planning have &een re)uired toconforma&ility and complying for socioeconomic development

    planning and land utili!ation planning

    There are many types of industry/&usiness development planning*Among them have four types of relation together as telecommunicationand information planning# power planning# road and railway planning#water supply and drainage planning

    %eneral planning for telecommunication and information developmentafter that is regional planning for telecommunication and informationdevelopment and after that is detailed area planning fortelecommunication and information development

    GENERAL/DETAIL INDUSTRY/BUSINESS

    DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    7/90

    GENERAL/DETAIL INDUSTRY/BUSINESS

    DEVELOPMENT PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    8/90

    There are two approaches for telecommunication and

    information planning as" %eneral telecommunication and

    information development planning and %eneral &usiness

    telecommunication and information networ- planning

    %eneral telecommunication and information development planning is

    general programming defined target# principle# oriented for development

    telecommunication mar-et and telecommunication infrastructures#

    technologies# services and performed solutions

    TELECOMMUNICATION AND

    INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    9/90

    %eneral &usiness telecommunication and information networ- planning

    is evolvement with the proper evolution of the networ-# the services# the

    technologies# the mar-et and the regulatory environment* These

    evolutions imply a wider set of options to implement a networ- than in

    the past and as a conse)uence# the importance of careful planning and

    analysis for alternatives have larger impact on the networ- capa&ilities

    today in order to assure the needed capacities# the associated )uality of

    service and the re)uired investments

    TELECOMMUNICATION AND

    INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    10/90

    %eneral telecommunication and information development planning are

    including"

    Regional information infrastructure planning and after that is detailed area

    informatics infrastructure planning

    Regional telecommunication infrastructure planning and after that is detailed

    area telecoms infrastructure planning

    Those are organi!ation telecommunication and information infrastructure

    according to national overall development programnning# industry of

    telecommunication and information development programming# ensurednational defence and security

    TELECOMMUNICATION AND

    INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    11/90

    %eneral &usiness telecommunication and information networ- planning

    are including"

    Regional/detailed area information networ- planning

    Regional/detailed area telecommunication networ- planning

    After that &oth types of planning have performed strategic

    networ-/&usiness planning# long term structural planning and

    sort/medium term planning

    After all other# if necessary may &e performed local specific planning todetailed steps of planning a&ove

    TELECOMMUNICATION AND

    INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    12/90

    TELECOMMUNICATION AND

    INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    13/90

    BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION

    NETWORK PLANNING

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    14/90

    or general feasi&ility to economically ustify the move

    towards the evolving architectures one should pay attention

    to planning of investments and services in a manner which

    ma-es sure there is no costly overinvestment nor &adutili!ation of already earlier made investments# and at the same

    time ensures fluent migration of the services for the large

    amount of eisting su&scri&ers

    BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION

    NETWORK PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    15/90

    5nder the previous evolutionary contet# the planner is confronted

    to a num&er of re)uirements in order to provide answers to the

    following needs"

    6usiness 7riented 8eeds"9hat are the &est customer segments to address in multimedia :

    9hich new services have to &e introduced through time :

    9hat is the &est service &undling per customer type :

    ;ow to increase mar-et share : ;ow to maimi!e revenues :

    ;ow to reduce capital ependiture :

    ;ow to reduce operational ependiture :

    REQUIREMENTS TO THE PLANNERS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    16/90

    8etwor- 7riented 8eeds"

    ;ow to forecast multimedia services and related traffic demands :

    ;ow many nodes to install# especially for 8%8 :

    9hat is &est location for new systems and related communication media :9hat is the &est networ- architecture and routing in 8%8 :

    6est &alance &etween &uilt and lease for infrastructure :

    ;ow to plan capacity evolution and solutions migration towards 8%8 and

    towards 3% :

    ;ow to converge service applications and platforms through different access

    technologies :

    ;ow to ensure

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    17/90

    7peration

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    18/90

    The most typical tas-s that the planner has to perform to solve the compleity

    associated to the previous re)uirements are summari!ed as follows"

    Initial situation analysis for economy# customers# services and networ-

    Pro&lem partitioning

    ata gathering

    efinition of alternatives per scenario

    >apping solutions per scenario

    esign# dimensioning# location and costing

    7ptimi!ation

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    19/90

    ue to the high speed of changes &oth on the environment and

    the technologies# the traditional planning activities that were

    performed in an separated way# today have to &e strongly

    interrelated among themselves and to the other networ- relatedtas-s* or that environment# the

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    20/90

    ata on topologies# architectures# location# routing# etc from

    long term planning are transferred to the medium term and

    iteratively to short term activities

    Planning results are transferred to 8> applications and viceversa# 8> measurements and status are provided as inputs to

    the planning activities

    7perating

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    21/90

    BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION

    NETWORK PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    22/90

    8etwor- planning addresses all the activities related to the

    definition of the networ- evolution in order to allow the

    transport of an epected amount of traffic demands# ta-ing into

    account a set of re)uirements and constraints* epending on

    the timescale of the networ- evolution pro&lem under study#three different planning activities can &e performed"

    Long-term plnn!ng ?=TP$# whose o&ectives are to define and

    dimension the networ- parts which are characteri!ed &y a long lifetime

    and large investments for their deployment

    BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION

    NETWORK PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    23/90

    Me"!#m-term plnn!ng ?>TP$# whose framewor- should emphasi!e the

    &ehavior and the relationships among the sets of entities ?nodes# lin-s#

    su&networ-s$ and the list of planning actions and procedures which are

    involved when planning a networ- to guarantee the convergence towards

    the esta&lished long term plans* Therefore# >TP should have as an

    o&ective the capacity upgrading of the networ- nodes and lin-s' always#

    following the =T deployment strategies of the optical networ-

    S$ort Term Plnn!ng ?

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    24/90

    ue to the high num&er of scenarios possi&le in the

    competition# a special analysis of those scenarios is needed in

    order to derive which ones are feasi&le &oth from a technical

    and economical point of view* The following structuredprocedure is recommended to perform those analyses in an

    iterative manner"

    Telecom networ- scenarios are generated with the premises derived from

    realistic mar-et share and competitive situation

    inal o&ective is to have a )uantified design fulfilling the strategy for

    the operator the re)uirements of the society and &eing feasi&le from the

    &usiness point of view

    INTERACTI%E PLANNING &OR

    COMPETITION SCENARIOS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    25/90

    efined processes and tas-s are needed for all solutions and

    technologies* Internal data and algorithms vary for each technology case

    eed&ac- among activities is needed to incorporate results of the

    optimi!ation on the inputs and assumptions

    6usiness assessment is made at the start of the process to select feasi&le

    solutions and discard the ones not &eing realistic* A more detailed

    &usiness plan is o&tained at the end of the analysis for the selected

    solutions and providing the &usiness and investment plans

    INTERACTI%E PLANNING &OR

    COMPETITION SCENARIOS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    26/90

    INTERACTI%E PLANNING &OR

    COMPETITION SCENARIOS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    27/90

    The o&ective of the longterm planning ?=TP$ is to define and

    dimension the networ- aspects which are characteri!ed &y a

    long life time and large investments for their deployment'

    therefore mainly the topological and technological decisions

    and fi&er ca&les capacity issues are addressed* =TP# then#ela&orates a target networ- o&ective for the mediumterm

    planning process' drawing to normally singleperiod processes

    Two different phases/approaches in =TP are generally

    considered

    LONG-TERM PLANNING 'LTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    28/90

    LONG-TERM PLANNING 'LTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    29/90

    The )trteg!* plnn!ng# which aims at defining the technology and

    architecture to &e used in the networ- through the comparison of

    different options* It is generally &ased on a greenfield approach and uses

    parametric models and typical values for the relevant networ- parameters

    n"mentl plnn!ng# which uses as input the technology and networ-architecture selected &y the strategic planning and defines the structure of

    the networ-2* The pro&lems to &e faced in the fundamental planning

    usually are the allocation of functions in the networ- nodes# the topology

    planning# the apportionment of functions &etween the optical and the

    client layer# the definition of an optimal networ- structure

    LONG-TERM PLANNING 'LTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    30/90

    The o&ective of ?>TP$ is the capacity upgrading of the

    networ- nodes and lin-s following the longterm deployment

    strategies of the optical networ-* Then# the goal of the >TP is

    to determine the routing map and node capacities

    >TP is normally performed in a multiperiod &asis' setting of the

    different steps for moving from the installed plan ?if any$ to the long

    term networ- o&ective ?calculated &y the =TP$

    6eing more concrete# >TP should generate the following results for each

    planning period"

    etailed routing and grooming for each demand ?traffic relation$* It should not

    have conflicts with the defined =TP criteria

    ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    31/90

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    32/90

    The >TP time scale should &e e)ual to the one for =TP and is su&divided

    into several shorter periods ?typically around one year each$* In a first

    step# the =TP process is performed for getting the =TP target networ-

    ?igure 2*,a$

    This first step uses the demand forecasts and the installed plant* In asecond step# the >TP process calculates the different steps for reaching

    the =TP target networ- ?2*,&$

    ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    33/90

    ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    34/90

    This second process uses as inputs the >TP multiperiod demand

    forecasts# the installed plant and the =TP plan ?generated in the first

    step$* 6oth steps should &e repeated each time the demand forecasts

    change dramatically' in any case# it is very normal to repeat them in each

    planning period ?T0# T1# B$# typically each year* In case of strong

    variations of the demand forecasts# the =TP target may change in eachplanning period* In this situation# the >TP plan ?steps$ calculated each

    year goes towards different targets' something li-e performing steps

    towards a CmovingD target

    5nder conditions of high uncertainty a 87 could adopt a different >TP

    approach ?igure 2*,c$# having its mediumterm plans ?>TPs$ partially

    disoint from its longterm plans ?=TPs$

    ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    35/90

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    36/90

    In this case the results of the =TPs are considered li-e a set of valua&leconstraints# rather than an a&solute target to &e reached* The mostimportant reasons driving this option seem to &e"

    The 7perator considers as useless to plan periods far away in the time since there

    is the highest pro&a&ility to have unrelia&le forecasting leading to unrelia&le

    results

    The optimi!ed results attaina&le in a static =TP are due to the huge advantage to

    &e a&le to use networ- resources in a long period of time selecting the &est fitting

    with the incremental traffic* 5nfortunately traffic demands are su&ect to time

    constraints ?not allowed to delay the provisioning of a circuit in order to optimi!e

    the networ- filling$ and the networ- resources deployment is su&ect to &udgetconstraints* onse)uently through the months and the periods the networ- grows

    unoptimised compared to the =TP perspective and it will &e impossi&le to stic-

    to the =TP programs even if >TP planning algorithm is the &est possi&le one

    ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    37/90

    PLANNING METHOD

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    38/90

    @perience of nationals in ma-es general was planning to

    apply scheme processes of other fields as environmental

    planning# management planning of resources# usedland

    planning# etc*

    There are normally three main su&ective groups ta-e part to construction

    planning with differential roles and lia&ilities those are"

    1$ Eurisdictional office'

    2$ Planning organi!ation'

    3$ ommunity

    PLANNING METHOD

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    39/90

    Eurisdictional office gets responsi&ility to ta-e the initiative

    planning process after decided higher authorities* Eurisdictional

    office has got responsi&ility approve constructive plans and

    ma-e sure the human and financial resources to performed

    plans

    =i-e this urisdictional office is a special administrative

    organi!ation of national or region or area

    ,URIS+ICTIONAL O&&ICE

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    40/90

    Planning organi!ation must &e included specialists to having a

    thorough -nowledge of planning wor-s and telecommunication

    eperts and other related eperts as authority of infrastructure

    programing# authority of constructive programing# authority of

    architectural programing# etc*

    PLANNING ORGANIATION

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    41/90

    ommunity is special su&ect represented to citi!ens# which have interest for proects

    Role of community su&ect to set up a plan may &e different from referenced advice to

    implemented programing

    7n eperience of international countries# division responsi&ilities &etween su&ects of

    planning organi!ation to su&ect of community may &e represented as Ta&le 2*2

    The selection is measure in oint of community depend on some factors as the content of

    programing and government policy and resources and of course ta-e interest in oneself

    community

    =evel oin of community as grow as directly responsi&ility planning organi!ation as

    decrease as correlatively

    If this matter have &een determined from the &eginning of planning process more

    advantageous

    COMMUNITY

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    42/90

    PLANNING METHOD

    orm and ta-ing part

    methodRole of community su&ect

    Fnowledged for show 8otice planning

    7n the increased to

    measure oin

    G

    @changed information Investigation and gatherinformation

    As-ed advice >eeting community

    >atter define together

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    43/90

    Planning process have &een divided five steps as"

    i$ Programing preparedness'

    ii$ Proposed programing'

    iii$ Planning creation'

    iv$ Approved planning'

    v$ Performance and supervision

    igure 2*13 show main results/products for general and detail

    planning If this matter have &een determined from the

    &eginning of planning process more advantageous

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    44/90

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    45/90

    Step 1 Programing preparedness

    Programing preparedness focus on determine main matters concerned to planning to

    fundamentals for planning as" 5r&an planning# usedland planning# infrastructure

    planning# architecture planning# construction planning# socioeconomic planning# etc*

    7n organi!ation# carry out special programing and &eginning to get in touch with

    community su&ect

    In a word# programing preparedness re)uired performance of wor-s as"

    etermined to main matters concerned to planning

    etermined/selected for planning organi!ation

    Research on informational demand

    ontact to community su&ect

    Research informational demand has &een carried out as follows"

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    46/90

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    47/90

    Step 2 Proposed programing

    Proposed programing included some actions' among them most important

    was construction eecutive plans

    In the step 2# the contents and range planning as well as role and

    participation of su&ects must &e defined and concreti!ed

    Eurisdictional office need to assert finance and necessary products of

    planning

    Planning organi!ation must &e completed collection and relative import

    information to geographical information system# &asic document unit

    6asic document unit included reports and enclosed map need to dispense to

    mem&ers of planning organi!ation and to &e fundamental to discussion at

    meetings

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    48/90

    This much# actions as follows need to finish in step 2"

    @sta&lished eecutive plan

    efinition the contents of planning and range of each contents

    inished &asic document unit

    Affirmation and assigned lia&ility of participative su&ects

    7piniona&le recording of su&ects for defined contents of planning

    In possi&le condition# &egin supplementary initial information according to

    planning

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    49/90

    Step 3 Planning creation

    Planning creation was most important to &ring out planning# often

    include three types of actions as follow"

    Action 1" ompletion information ?document# map # data# etc*$* This action needs

    to perform main wor-s as" Review and evaluation for new informational demand'

    ollection new information' To &e incorporated %I

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    50/90

    Step 4 Approed planning

    Approved planning was ordinary carried out rules availa&le# as follow"

    Eurisdictional office organi!ed a meeting for introduce to planning with relevant

    office and planning organi!ation and specialists

    Eurisdictional office re)uired relevant organi!ations valuation and comment for

    planning

    Eurisdictional office has approved planning or if not approved then there was

    re)uired ministry of specialty in writing and approved process has repeated as

    a&ove

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    51/90

    Step ! Performance and superision planning

    This is last step of planning process

    Approved planning will &e transferred relevant offices to eecution

    In order to ensure planning has &een deployed on reality and learn fromeperience for net planning

    Eurisdictional office has decided to carry out supervise eecution planning

    There are two forms supervise eecution planning those are" 1$ Permanent

    supervise' 2$ Periodic supervise

    orm permanent supervise has carried out valuation ensure rate of process

    eecute planning# called supervise process

    PLANNING PROCESS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    52/90

    orm periodic supervise ?may &e three or five years a time$ has carried out

    valuation result of planning and its impact to initial target# called effective

    supervise

    @ach of forms supervise has re)uirement and organi!ation and eecutive

    method individually* 6ut all of them were important and supplementary

    each other and ensure planning served life

    In &rief# step ( CPerformance and supervision planningD includes actions"

    Reali!ed contents of planning has &een approved

    >a-e plan supervised eecutive planning

    arry out supervise process and/or

    arry out supervise for effect

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    53/90

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    54/90

    The deployment of access networ-s with a reasona&le costre)uires planning and implementation of the design in a wellorgani!ed manner* %enerally there are two &asic approaches tothe networ- planning

    The classical approach# which is currently used for the planning ofnarrow&and networ-s# is &ased on the forecast of demands and thedimensioning of the networ- in order to minimi!e the re)uired networ-resources ?ca&ling# e)uipment$

    This approach is oriented towards the minimi!ation of the investments

    re)uired to provide a given amount of resources and is very suita&le forsituations where the traffic and num&er of su&scri&ers increases smoothly

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNINGMETHO+OLOGY

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    55/90

    The new transport technologies# li-e 9> have made the optimi!ationof resources less critical the operators have o&tained a technology#which provides the a&ility to rapid and su&stantial increase of thenetwor- capacity at the moderate cost level

    7n the other hand the growing popularity of the Internet has led to the

    fast and su&stantial traffic increase in short time frame and pro&lems withrelia&le forecasting of demands

    In this situation# the uncertainty in the demand forecast and the relativelylow cost of the &andwidth have limited the applications of the traditional

    planning it produces a networ- that is optimi!ed for a given demand

    matri# &ut it does not guarantee that the networ- is ready for upgrade incase the demands were underestimated or growing

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING

    METHO+OLOGY

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    56/90

    The second design approach is to &uild a networ- that can provide a

    considera&le ecess of resources ?transport# switching or routing$ thus

    providing nearly seamless networ- upgrade at the price of higher initial

    cost

    The presented networ- design approaches can &e com&ined together inorder to find the solution that &etter fits the operators needs and strategy

    8etwor- planning should address aspects related to the networ-

    evolution* Traditionally the planning activities can &e divided into TP$ and =ong TermPlanning ?=TP$

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING

    METHO+OLOGY

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    57/90

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    58/90

    The coherency is in practice hard to o&tain and operators of the access

    networ-s are often applying a more pragmatic and simpler approach for

    the networ- design

    A planning process of access networ-s is strongly dependent on the

    networ- technology# networ- architecture# offered functionality andresource allocation strategies

    As more technological solutions are availa&le on the mar-et# the operator

    has more options for the design of a suita&le and costeffective access

    networ-

    5nfortunately it ma-es the access networ- design process more

    complicated

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING

    METHO+OLOGY

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    59/90

    It is possi&le to formulate mathematically most of the networ-optimi!ation pro&lems

    The mathematical formulation of the pro&lem has to use appropriatenetwor- models# necessary simplifications and general assumptions

    In practice there is hard to find the optimal solution for the networ-# &utthe o&tained solutions can &e close to the optimum

    The applica&ility of a particular solving techni)ue is in close relationwith the si!e of the pro&lem# which depends on the type and num&er ofinput varia&les and constraints# and on the type of the used cost/energy

    function# which is minimi!ed during the optimi!ation process

    MATHEMATICAL &OUN+ATIONS O& ACCESS

    NETWORK PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    60/90

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    61/90

    A A CA O A O S O ACC SS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    62/90

    MATHEMATICAL &OUN+ATIONS O& ACCESS

    NETWORK PLANNING

    Models Op!"!#$!o% Al&o'!("s>ulti commodity flow model @numeration @numerationPathflow mode l 6ranch and &oundPath formulation model Relaation techni)ues

    >arginal improvement techni)ues

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    63/90

    The access networ- design process is a process that has to cope with many initial assumptionsand also with many constraints

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    64/90

    8etwor- planning tools are offered &y the access networ- solution vendors#planning tools vendors and academic institutions

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    65/90

    The TITA8 proect started in 12 and ended in 1+* The developed

    within this proect TITA8 networ- optimi!ation tool is dedicated for

    technoeconomic analysis# and a demand forecast for access networ-

    The tool is &ased on generali!ed access networ- models and utili!es the

    geometrical model for the calculation of ca&le lengths and the cost of civil

    wor-s

    It covers ?non ehaustive list$ the following aspects"

    The evaluation of access networ- evolution scenarios &ased on eisting networ-s

    and fi&re/radio/copper access technologies

    The comparison of scenarios and strategies for introducing the fi&re in the loop

    ?IT=$ for residential customers

    The calculation of the lifecycle cost and the overall system &udget

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    66/90

    The TITA8 tool is &ased on the @celK spreadsheet

    It has two operating modes the main mode and the data&ase mode

    The data&ase mode is used for the estimation of the cost of components and

    services# while the main mode is used for the definition of the networ-

    architecture# services and performing all calculations The TITA8 data&ase contains several sections"

    ost components# containing all component specific information

    =earning curve classes# which define a specific learning curve &ehaviour

    Holume classes# which define a specific mar-et volume evolution

    7AL> classes# which define a certain operations# administration and maintenance

    9riteoff period class which defines a component lifetimes for calculation of depreciation

    5ncertainty class# which defines the relative uncertainty for the ris- assessment

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    67/90

    The o&ective of another @uropean proect# A22+/7PTI>5> was the calculation ofthe overall financial &udget of all -inds of access solutions

    In result a networ-planning tool has &een developed# which ta-es into account" the

    system cost# operation and maintenance costs# lifecycle costs and the cash &alance of

    the proect

    In the 7PTI>5> proect the networ- evolution costs are also considered* The tool

    com&ines low level# detailed networ- parameters with high level parameters# which is

    seen as the -ey feature of the 7PTI>5> methodology and the tool

    The structure of the 7PTI>5> tool is shown in the igure 2*.

    T@RA was a proect reali!ed within the AT< Programme ?142000$* ompared to

    its predecessor# the T@RA tool aims at the study of architectures spanning the whole

    telecom networ-# not only the access networ- part ?http"//wwwnrc*

    no-ia*com/tonic/description/&g*htm$

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS

    http://wwwnrc/http://wwwnrc/
  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    68/90

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    69/90

    The framewor- of the T@RA technoeconomic evaluations is shown inthe igure 2**

    The geometric planning model is an optional part of the T@RA tool* The

    model is used to estimate the amount of ca&le/fi&re and ducting re)uired

    in the networ-7n the conceptual level the geometric model is a function that ta-es

    several inputs such as su&scri&er density# networ- topology ?star# ring#

    &us$# average ca&le over length# duct availa&ility# etc* and gives two

    outputs# which are the total amount of ca&le/fi&re re)uired in the networ-

    and the total amount of new duct re)uired*

    The TITA8 networ- model is a part of the T@RA tool

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    70/90

    ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    71/90

    ECONOMICAL MO+ELING O& PLANNINGMO+ELS

    METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    72/90

    A 6usiness Plan presents the calculation of the financial

    indicators that ena&le the managers to evaluate the financial

    performances of an enterprise in order to ta-e &est decisions

    for the overall operation

    ue to the high num&er of alternatives today and the need to

    find economic feasi&ility in competition# the &usiness

    evaluations are &eing used not only for the &usiness plan itself

    &ut as an iterative evaluation of those technoeconomical

    alternatives to select the ones that perform &etter in thecompetitive mar-et

    BUSINESS PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    73/90

    A &usiness plan summari!es the results of the planning process

    The o&ectives to reach ? su&scri&ers demand# sales$

    The future revenues epected from the plan and per service class

    The planned epenses ?investment and operations$ as overall and perservice class

    The accounting statements and the financial indicators characteri!ing

    the profita&ility of the proect

    The framewor- structure for the evaluation follows the model ofthe figure* @ach &o is epanded with more degree of detail as a

    function of the plan time frame with the corresponding des

    aggregation

    BUSINESS PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    74/90

    B#)!ne)) mo"el )tr#*t#re 2or plnn!ng

    BUSINESS PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    75/90

    @conomical modeling to evaluate networ- solutions ?modeling

    tariffs# e)uipment costs per type# economy of scale# lifecycle#

    e)uipment deployment# elasticity# trends with time$

    ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    76/90

    ue to the high num&er of new services and large variety ofmar-eting characteristics# one of the most interesting planning

    activities when operating 8%8 is the economic modeling of the

    services costs# revenues and profita&ility# either per single service or

    for groups of services in the case of a &undle offer

    The service related modelling is a su&set of the overall 8%8

    economic modelling that represents with less detail the analysis of

    technological variants and for a given networ- solution models with

    more detail the demand# dimensioning# tariffs# revenues and

    profita&ility of the services themselves

    ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    77/90

    In order to consider correctly the per service impacts on the

    networ- and &usiness# it should &e differentiated in all

    economic evaluations those values due to"

    The overall operation company

    The glo&al networ- solution

    The &road&and platform needed for all new services

    The specific platform for each service type

    ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    78/90

    >odelling and differentiation of resources# cost drivers# revenuedrivers with the corresponding cost allocation per service type is a

    must for the -nowledge of impact from each service and to decide

    the introduction strategy per service or service &undle

    >aor cost drivers for multimedia service re)uire the evaluation of alldimensioning units li-e"

    8um&er of 5sers

    8um&er of 66 ports

    AP< ?all Attempts Per

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    79/90

    Those units# dimensioning and costing has to &e performed for thefollowing networ- resources"

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    80/90

    7perational epenses also need to &e modeled with differentiation perservice type and service group# &oth for the technical operation#

    maintenance# software upgrades as well as for the mar-eting# promotion#

    training# etc* that will &e important at the first years of the new services

    or all the common costs either due to 66 platforms as well as for common

    networ- resources and overall company operation# a sharing factor has to

    &e evaluated also as a function of partial consumed resources that will

    aggregate to the specific cost

    >aor revenue drivers for multimedia services need to consider the contract fee#

    monthly fee and usage/traffic dependent fee# either in erlangs# >&s# time# delivery

    unit ?ie" video film$ etc*

    ue to confluence of many new multimedia services of heterogeneous types# it is

    fundamental to -eep trac- of consumed resources per service type in order to &e a&le

    to perform &ac-ward cost allocation as a function of utili!ation

    ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    81/90

    This will allow a latter calculation of proper tariffs to o&tain the serviceprofita&ility either for single services or services &undles and to ensure

    fulfillment regulation principles when activity &ased costing is used

    or those services provided in a shared mode &y multiple players# li-e

    video content# gaming# etc* sharing factors among players have to &e

    applied for the evaluation of glo&al revenues and partial revenues to &e

    incorporated to the operator income

    ecision ma-ing of which service is introduced first# which grouping or

    services and for what customer types will &e function of the profita&ility

    of those alternatives that have a high sensitivity to the services mi &y theeconomy of scale factors* That high impact on the economy of scale is the

    main driver for convergence of services and the interest of Ctriple playD

    and Dmultiple playD strategies

    ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    82/90

    The telecom e)uipment and infrastructure have to &e installed at periodical intervals as afunction of the demand evolution

    That intervals or provisioning periods for a given technology are a function of the demandgrowing rate# the systems capacity and modularity# the life cycle of the installed e)uipmentand the corresponding associated costs

    The diagram &elow illustrates three provisioning scenarios for a given demand over time"

    In scenario A# the provisioning is performed at short regular periods ?say yearly or )uarterly$ minimi!ing the spare

    capacity &ut increasing the installation costs &y the high num&er of intervention' in addition an unepected demand

    grow at higher rate will imply under provisioning and lost of )uality of service as well as of customers

    In scenario 6# the provisioning is performed for the epected demand over a long period or Conce for allD with a

    high startup cost in AP@N and high maintenance for an installed e)uipment with low utili!ation rate

    In scenario # the num&er and volume of provisioning is optimi!ed to minimi!e ost of 7wnership that considers

    &oth AP@N and 7P@N while maintaining ade)uate utili!ation rates and Muality of

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    83/90

    The dynamic optimi!ation pro&lem in networ- planning ta-es carefor the optimum provisioning periods and volumes in order tominimi!e costs and is a function of the following parameters"

    emand growing rate and forecast relia&ility

    @)uipment capacity and modularity Technical life cycle and capa&ility to provide new services

    @conomical lifecycle

    @)uipment fied costs and incremental costs

    7perational and maintenance costs

    =a&our costs

    Interest rate and inflation rate

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

    MO+ERNIATION

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    84/90

    In the case of availa&ility of new technologies of the samefunctionality with larger capacities or when new functionalitiesappear li-e in the networ- migration towards 8%8# the

    decisions to &e ta-en &y the planner introduce additional

    scenarios" Increase of capacity with same technology modularity ?ie" more 1

    systems$ versus umping to the net technology modularity ?i"e"su&stituting 1 &y 4 or 1+$

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    85/90

    Strteg!e) o2 net5or6 re)o#r*e) "eplo4ment **or"!ng to l!2e*4*le n" e*onom!*)

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

    MO+ERNIATION

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    86/90

    In these types of scenarios# in addition to the previous parameters# thepossi&ility to provide same services with additional su& networ-s andthe possi&ility to provide new services not feasi&le with installedtechnologies# introduce additional compleity in the technoeconomical evaluation &y the need to incorporate in the evaluation the

    differential revenues &y those new services

    Fey parameters that most influence on the decision are the degree ofe)uipment o&solescence or remaining time of the life cycle period# thenew customers grow rate and the epected cash flows &y the newservices

    The evaluation process has to consider and compare the 8et PresentHalue ?8PH$ of potential alternatives with all costs and revenues peralternative with the discounted cash flows

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

    MO+ERNIATION

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    87/90

    The proper selection of those alternatives that" first fulfil theprofita&ility re)uirements and second provides &etter 8PH and

    Internal Rate of Return "IRR# will give the decision to the planner on

    the e)uili&rium &etween the amorti!ation versus moderni!ation or

    su&stitution &y the new generation technology

    The large variety of scenarios in actual networ-s do not allow a

    generic recommendation# although it is common that in new

    %reenfield areas and with o&solete e)uipment that has to &e

    renovated anyhow it may &e recommended the installation of new

    generation systems once all technical capa&ilities are availa&le andproved

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

    MO+ERNIATION

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    88/90

    Also it is fre)uent that for modern e)uipment with re)uiredfunctionalities and many years remaining to fulfil the life cycle#

    su&stitution is delayed until economically feasi&le

    This com&ination of decisions is called cap and gro$ and is the

    more fre)uent today# &ut for every country# region and servicesdemand scenario# the 8PH and IRR have to &e evaluated in order to

    ensure not only positive &usiness results &ut also results in line with

    &enchmar-ing values in order to survive in a competitive

    environment

    CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS

    MO+ERNIATION

    Q & A

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    89/90

    Q & A

  • 8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning

    90/90

    Ce%e' o) Co%s*l$%+, $%d Te+(%olo&, T'$%s)e'

    Research Institute of Posts And Telecommunication

    Telep$one1 78 8 9 :;< =79/> 78 8 9 :;8 887