part 2.2 methology planning
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
1/90
POST AND TELECOMMUNICATION INSTITUTE
OF TECHNOLOGY
PART 4
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING
MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
2/90
ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL PLANNING
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
3/90
ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL PLANNING
Activities of national planning includes two types of omestic
overall planning for socioeconomic development and omestic
overall planning for land utili!ation"
omestic overall planning for socioeconomic development includes three
types# those so" i$ %eneral planning for industry/&usiness development and
after that is detail region/area planning for industry/&usiness development' ii$
Region overall planning for socioeconomic development and after that is area
overall planning for socioeconomic development' iii$ Region general
construction planning and after that is area general construction planning
omestic overall planning for land utili!ation and after that is region general
planning for land utili!ation and after that is area general planning for land
utili!ation
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
4/90
ACTIVITIES OF NATIONAL PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
5/90
GENERAL/DETAIL INDUSTRY/BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
6/90
Industry/&usiness development planning have &een re)uired toconforma&ility and complying for socioeconomic development
planning and land utili!ation planning
There are many types of industry/&usiness development planning*Among them have four types of relation together as telecommunicationand information planning# power planning# road and railway planning#water supply and drainage planning
%eneral planning for telecommunication and information developmentafter that is regional planning for telecommunication and informationdevelopment and after that is detailed area planning fortelecommunication and information development
GENERAL/DETAIL INDUSTRY/BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
7/90
GENERAL/DETAIL INDUSTRY/BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
8/90
There are two approaches for telecommunication and
information planning as" %eneral telecommunication and
information development planning and %eneral &usiness
telecommunication and information networ- planning
%eneral telecommunication and information development planning is
general programming defined target# principle# oriented for development
telecommunication mar-et and telecommunication infrastructures#
technologies# services and performed solutions
TELECOMMUNICATION AND
INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
9/90
%eneral &usiness telecommunication and information networ- planning
is evolvement with the proper evolution of the networ-# the services# the
technologies# the mar-et and the regulatory environment* These
evolutions imply a wider set of options to implement a networ- than in
the past and as a conse)uence# the importance of careful planning and
analysis for alternatives have larger impact on the networ- capa&ilities
today in order to assure the needed capacities# the associated )uality of
service and the re)uired investments
TELECOMMUNICATION AND
INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
10/90
%eneral telecommunication and information development planning are
including"
Regional information infrastructure planning and after that is detailed area
informatics infrastructure planning
Regional telecommunication infrastructure planning and after that is detailed
area telecoms infrastructure planning
Those are organi!ation telecommunication and information infrastructure
according to national overall development programnning# industry of
telecommunication and information development programming# ensurednational defence and security
TELECOMMUNICATION AND
INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
11/90
%eneral &usiness telecommunication and information networ- planning
are including"
Regional/detailed area information networ- planning
Regional/detailed area telecommunication networ- planning
After that &oth types of planning have performed strategic
networ-/&usiness planning# long term structural planning and
sort/medium term planning
After all other# if necessary may &e performed local specific planning todetailed steps of planning a&ove
TELECOMMUNICATION AND
INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
12/90
TELECOMMUNICATION AND
INFORMATION PLANNING APPROACHES
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
13/90
BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION
NETWORK PLANNING
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
14/90
or general feasi&ility to economically ustify the move
towards the evolving architectures one should pay attention
to planning of investments and services in a manner which
ma-es sure there is no costly overinvestment nor &adutili!ation of already earlier made investments# and at the same
time ensures fluent migration of the services for the large
amount of eisting su&scri&ers
BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION
NETWORK PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
15/90
5nder the previous evolutionary contet# the planner is confronted
to a num&er of re)uirements in order to provide answers to the
following needs"
6usiness 7riented 8eeds"9hat are the &est customer segments to address in multimedia :
9hich new services have to &e introduced through time :
9hat is the &est service &undling per customer type :
;ow to increase mar-et share : ;ow to maimi!e revenues :
;ow to reduce capital ependiture :
;ow to reduce operational ependiture :
REQUIREMENTS TO THE PLANNERS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
16/90
8etwor- 7riented 8eeds"
;ow to forecast multimedia services and related traffic demands :
;ow many nodes to install# especially for 8%8 :
9hat is &est location for new systems and related communication media :9hat is the &est networ- architecture and routing in 8%8 :
6est &alance &etween &uilt and lease for infrastructure :
;ow to plan capacity evolution and solutions migration towards 8%8 and
towards 3% :
;ow to converge service applications and platforms through different access
technologies :
;ow to ensure
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
17/90
7peration
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
18/90
The most typical tas-s that the planner has to perform to solve the compleity
associated to the previous re)uirements are summari!ed as follows"
Initial situation analysis for economy# customers# services and networ-
Pro&lem partitioning
ata gathering
efinition of alternatives per scenario
>apping solutions per scenario
esign# dimensioning# location and costing
7ptimi!ation
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
19/90
ue to the high speed of changes &oth on the environment and
the technologies# the traditional planning activities that were
performed in an separated way# today have to &e strongly
interrelated among themselves and to the other networ- relatedtas-s* or that environment# the
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
20/90
ata on topologies# architectures# location# routing# etc from
long term planning are transferred to the medium term and
iteratively to short term activities
Planning results are transferred to 8> applications and viceversa# 8> measurements and status are provided as inputs to
the planning activities
7perating
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
21/90
BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION
NETWORK PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
22/90
8etwor- planning addresses all the activities related to the
definition of the networ- evolution in order to allow the
transport of an epected amount of traffic demands# ta-ing into
account a set of re)uirements and constraints* epending on
the timescale of the networ- evolution pro&lem under study#three different planning activities can &e performed"
Long-term plnn!ng ?=TP$# whose o&ectives are to define and
dimension the networ- parts which are characteri!ed &y a long lifetime
and large investments for their deployment
BUSINESS TELECOMMUNICATION
NETWORK PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
23/90
Me"!#m-term plnn!ng ?>TP$# whose framewor- should emphasi!e the
&ehavior and the relationships among the sets of entities ?nodes# lin-s#
su&networ-s$ and the list of planning actions and procedures which are
involved when planning a networ- to guarantee the convergence towards
the esta&lished long term plans* Therefore# >TP should have as an
o&ective the capacity upgrading of the networ- nodes and lin-s' always#
following the =T deployment strategies of the optical networ-
S$ort Term Plnn!ng ?
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
24/90
ue to the high num&er of scenarios possi&le in the
competition# a special analysis of those scenarios is needed in
order to derive which ones are feasi&le &oth from a technical
and economical point of view* The following structuredprocedure is recommended to perform those analyses in an
iterative manner"
Telecom networ- scenarios are generated with the premises derived from
realistic mar-et share and competitive situation
inal o&ective is to have a )uantified design fulfilling the strategy for
the operator the re)uirements of the society and &eing feasi&le from the
&usiness point of view
INTERACTI%E PLANNING &OR
COMPETITION SCENARIOS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
25/90
efined processes and tas-s are needed for all solutions and
technologies* Internal data and algorithms vary for each technology case
eed&ac- among activities is needed to incorporate results of the
optimi!ation on the inputs and assumptions
6usiness assessment is made at the start of the process to select feasi&le
solutions and discard the ones not &eing realistic* A more detailed
&usiness plan is o&tained at the end of the analysis for the selected
solutions and providing the &usiness and investment plans
INTERACTI%E PLANNING &OR
COMPETITION SCENARIOS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
26/90
INTERACTI%E PLANNING &OR
COMPETITION SCENARIOS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
27/90
The o&ective of the longterm planning ?=TP$ is to define and
dimension the networ- aspects which are characteri!ed &y a
long life time and large investments for their deployment'
therefore mainly the topological and technological decisions
and fi&er ca&les capacity issues are addressed* =TP# then#ela&orates a target networ- o&ective for the mediumterm
planning process' drawing to normally singleperiod processes
Two different phases/approaches in =TP are generally
considered
LONG-TERM PLANNING 'LTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
28/90
LONG-TERM PLANNING 'LTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
29/90
The )trteg!* plnn!ng# which aims at defining the technology and
architecture to &e used in the networ- through the comparison of
different options* It is generally &ased on a greenfield approach and uses
parametric models and typical values for the relevant networ- parameters
n"mentl plnn!ng# which uses as input the technology and networ-architecture selected &y the strategic planning and defines the structure of
the networ-2* The pro&lems to &e faced in the fundamental planning
usually are the allocation of functions in the networ- nodes# the topology
planning# the apportionment of functions &etween the optical and the
client layer# the definition of an optimal networ- structure
LONG-TERM PLANNING 'LTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
30/90
The o&ective of ?>TP$ is the capacity upgrading of the
networ- nodes and lin-s following the longterm deployment
strategies of the optical networ-* Then# the goal of the >TP is
to determine the routing map and node capacities
>TP is normally performed in a multiperiod &asis' setting of the
different steps for moving from the installed plan ?if any$ to the long
term networ- o&ective ?calculated &y the =TP$
6eing more concrete# >TP should generate the following results for each
planning period"
etailed routing and grooming for each demand ?traffic relation$* It should not
have conflicts with the defined =TP criteria
ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
31/90
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
32/90
The >TP time scale should &e e)ual to the one for =TP and is su÷d
into several shorter periods ?typically around one year each$* In a first
step# the =TP process is performed for getting the =TP target networ-
?igure 2*,a$
This first step uses the demand forecasts and the installed plant* In asecond step# the >TP process calculates the different steps for reaching
the =TP target networ- ?2*,&$
ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
33/90
ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
34/90
This second process uses as inputs the >TP multiperiod demand
forecasts# the installed plant and the =TP plan ?generated in the first
step$* 6oth steps should &e repeated each time the demand forecasts
change dramatically' in any case# it is very normal to repeat them in each
planning period ?T0# T1# B$# typically each year* In case of strong
variations of the demand forecasts# the =TP target may change in eachplanning period* In this situation# the >TP plan ?steps$ calculated each
year goes towards different targets' something li-e performing steps
towards a CmovingD target
5nder conditions of high uncertainty a 87 could adopt a different >TP
approach ?igure 2*,c$# having its mediumterm plans ?>TPs$ partially
disoint from its longterm plans ?=TPs$
ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP(
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
35/90
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
36/90
In this case the results of the =TPs are considered li-e a set of valua&leconstraints# rather than an a&solute target to &e reached* The mostimportant reasons driving this option seem to &e"
The 7perator considers as useless to plan periods far away in the time since there
is the highest pro&a&ility to have unrelia&le forecasting leading to unrelia&le
results
The optimi!ed results attaina&le in a static =TP are due to the huge advantage to
&e a&le to use networ- resources in a long period of time selecting the &est fitting
with the incremental traffic* 5nfortunately traffic demands are su&ect to time
constraints ?not allowed to delay the provisioning of a circuit in order to optimi!e
the networ- filling$ and the networ- resources deployment is su&ect to &udgetconstraints* onse)uently through the months and the periods the networ- grows
unoptimised compared to the =TP perspective and it will &e impossi&le to stic-
to the =TP programs even if >TP planning algorithm is the &est possi&le one
ME+IUM-TERM PLANNING 'MTP
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
37/90
PLANNING METHOD
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
38/90
@perience of nationals in ma-es general was planning to
apply scheme processes of other fields as environmental
planning# management planning of resources# usedland
planning# etc*
There are normally three main su&ective groups ta-e part to construction
planning with differential roles and lia&ilities those are"
1$ Eurisdictional office'
2$ Planning organi!ation'
3$ ommunity
PLANNING METHOD
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
39/90
Eurisdictional office gets responsi&ility to ta-e the initiative
planning process after decided higher authorities* Eurisdictional
office has got responsi&ility approve constructive plans and
ma-e sure the human and financial resources to performed
plans
=i-e this urisdictional office is a special administrative
organi!ation of national or region or area
,URIS+ICTIONAL O&&ICE
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
40/90
Planning organi!ation must &e included specialists to having a
thorough -nowledge of planning wor-s and telecommunication
eperts and other related eperts as authority of infrastructure
programing# authority of constructive programing# authority of
architectural programing# etc*
PLANNING ORGANIATION
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
41/90
ommunity is special su&ect represented to citi!ens# which have interest for proects
Role of community su&ect to set up a plan may &e different from referenced advice to
implemented programing
7n eperience of international countries# division responsi&ilities &etween su&ects of
planning organi!ation to su&ect of community may &e represented as Ta&le 2*2
The selection is measure in oint of community depend on some factors as the content of
programing and government policy and resources and of course ta-e interest in oneself
community
=evel oin of community as grow as directly responsi&ility planning organi!ation as
decrease as correlatively
If this matter have &een determined from the &eginning of planning process more
advantageous
COMMUNITY
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
42/90
PLANNING METHOD
orm and ta-ing part
methodRole of community su&ect
Fnowledged for show 8otice planning
7n the increased to
measure oin
G
@changed information Investigation and gatherinformation
As-ed advice >eeting community
>atter define together
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
43/90
Planning process have &een divided five steps as"
i$ Programing preparedness'
ii$ Proposed programing'
iii$ Planning creation'
iv$ Approved planning'
v$ Performance and supervision
igure 2*13 show main results/products for general and detail
planning If this matter have &een determined from the
&eginning of planning process more advantageous
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
44/90
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
45/90
Step 1 Programing preparedness
Programing preparedness focus on determine main matters concerned to planning to
fundamentals for planning as" 5r&an planning# usedland planning# infrastructure
planning# architecture planning# construction planning# socioeconomic planning# etc*
7n organi!ation# carry out special programing and &eginning to get in touch with
community su&ect
In a word# programing preparedness re)uired performance of wor-s as"
etermined to main matters concerned to planning
etermined/selected for planning organi!ation
Research on informational demand
ontact to community su&ect
Research informational demand has &een carried out as follows"
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
46/90
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
47/90
Step 2 Proposed programing
Proposed programing included some actions' among them most important
was construction eecutive plans
In the step 2# the contents and range planning as well as role and
participation of su&ects must &e defined and concreti!ed
Eurisdictional office need to assert finance and necessary products of
planning
Planning organi!ation must &e completed collection and relative import
information to geographical information system# &asic document unit
6asic document unit included reports and enclosed map need to dispense to
mem&ers of planning organi!ation and to &e fundamental to discussion at
meetings
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
48/90
This much# actions as follows need to finish in step 2"
@sta&lished eecutive plan
efinition the contents of planning and range of each contents
inished &asic document unit
Affirmation and assigned lia&ility of participative su&ects
7piniona&le recording of su&ects for defined contents of planning
In possi&le condition# &egin supplementary initial information according to
planning
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
49/90
Step 3 Planning creation
Planning creation was most important to &ring out planning# often
include three types of actions as follow"
Action 1" ompletion information ?document# map # data# etc*$* This action needs
to perform main wor-s as" Review and evaluation for new informational demand'
ollection new information' To &e incorporated %I
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
50/90
Step 4 Approed planning
Approved planning was ordinary carried out rules availa&le# as follow"
Eurisdictional office organi!ed a meeting for introduce to planning with relevant
office and planning organi!ation and specialists
Eurisdictional office re)uired relevant organi!ations valuation and comment for
planning
Eurisdictional office has approved planning or if not approved then there was
re)uired ministry of specialty in writing and approved process has repeated as
a&ove
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
51/90
Step ! Performance and superision planning
This is last step of planning process
Approved planning will &e transferred relevant offices to eecution
In order to ensure planning has &een deployed on reality and learn fromeperience for net planning
Eurisdictional office has decided to carry out supervise eecution planning
There are two forms supervise eecution planning those are" 1$ Permanent
supervise' 2$ Periodic supervise
orm permanent supervise has carried out valuation ensure rate of process
eecute planning# called supervise process
PLANNING PROCESS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
52/90
orm periodic supervise ?may &e three or five years a time$ has carried out
valuation result of planning and its impact to initial target# called effective
supervise
@ach of forms supervise has re)uirement and organi!ation and eecutive
method individually* 6ut all of them were important and supplementary
each other and ensure planning served life
In &rief# step ( CPerformance and supervision planningD includes actions"
Reali!ed contents of planning has &een approved
>a-e plan supervised eecutive planning
arry out supervise process and/or
arry out supervise for effect
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
53/90
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
54/90
The deployment of access networ-s with a reasona&le costre)uires planning and implementation of the design in a wellorgani!ed manner* %enerally there are two &asic approaches tothe networ- planning
The classical approach# which is currently used for the planning ofnarrow&and networ-s# is &ased on the forecast of demands and thedimensioning of the networ- in order to minimi!e the re)uired networ-resources ?ca&ling# e)uipment$
This approach is oriented towards the minimi!ation of the investments
re)uired to provide a given amount of resources and is very suita&le forsituations where the traffic and num&er of su&scri&ers increases smoothly
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNINGMETHO+OLOGY
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
55/90
The new transport technologies# li-e 9> have made the optimi!ationof resources less critical the operators have o&tained a technology#which provides the a&ility to rapid and su&stantial increase of thenetwor- capacity at the moderate cost level
7n the other hand the growing popularity of the Internet has led to the
fast and su&stantial traffic increase in short time frame and pro&lems withrelia&le forecasting of demands
In this situation# the uncertainty in the demand forecast and the relativelylow cost of the &andwidth have limited the applications of the traditional
planning it produces a networ- that is optimi!ed for a given demand
matri# &ut it does not guarantee that the networ- is ready for upgrade incase the demands were underestimated or growing
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING
METHO+OLOGY
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
56/90
The second design approach is to &uild a networ- that can provide a
considera&le ecess of resources ?transport# switching or routing$ thus
providing nearly seamless networ- upgrade at the price of higher initial
cost
The presented networ- design approaches can &e com&ined together inorder to find the solution that &etter fits the operators needs and strategy
8etwor- planning should address aspects related to the networ-
evolution* Traditionally the planning activities can &e divided into TP$ and =ong TermPlanning ?=TP$
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING
METHO+OLOGY
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
57/90
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
58/90
The coherency is in practice hard to o&tain and operators of the access
networ-s are often applying a more pragmatic and simpler approach for
the networ- design
A planning process of access networ-s is strongly dependent on the
networ- technology# networ- architecture# offered functionality andresource allocation strategies
As more technological solutions are availa&le on the mar-et# the operator
has more options for the design of a suita&le and costeffective access
networ-
5nfortunately it ma-es the access networ- design process more
complicated
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING
METHO+OLOGY
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
59/90
It is possi&le to formulate mathematically most of the networ-optimi!ation pro&lems
The mathematical formulation of the pro&lem has to use appropriatenetwor- models# necessary simplifications and general assumptions
In practice there is hard to find the optimal solution for the networ-# &utthe o&tained solutions can &e close to the optimum
The applica&ility of a particular solving techni)ue is in close relationwith the si!e of the pro&lem# which depends on the type and num&er ofinput varia&les and constraints# and on the type of the used cost/energy
function# which is minimi!ed during the optimi!ation process
MATHEMATICAL &OUN+ATIONS O& ACCESS
NETWORK PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
60/90
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
61/90
A A CA O A O S O ACC SS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
62/90
MATHEMATICAL &OUN+ATIONS O& ACCESS
NETWORK PLANNING
Models Op!"!#$!o% Al&o'!("s>ulti commodity flow model @numeration @numerationPathflow mode l 6ranch and &oundPath formulation model Relaation techni)ues
>arginal improvement techni)ues
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
63/90
The access networ- design process is a process that has to cope with many initial assumptionsand also with many constraints
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
64/90
8etwor- planning tools are offered &y the access networ- solution vendors#planning tools vendors and academic institutions
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
65/90
The TITA8 proect started in 12 and ended in 1+* The developed
within this proect TITA8 networ- optimi!ation tool is dedicated for
technoeconomic analysis# and a demand forecast for access networ-
The tool is &ased on generali!ed access networ- models and utili!es the
geometrical model for the calculation of ca&le lengths and the cost of civil
wor-s
It covers ?non ehaustive list$ the following aspects"
The evaluation of access networ- evolution scenarios &ased on eisting networ-s
and fi&re/radio/copper access technologies
The comparison of scenarios and strategies for introducing the fi&re in the loop
?IT=$ for residential customers
The calculation of the lifecycle cost and the overall system &udget
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
66/90
The TITA8 tool is &ased on the @celK spreadsheet
It has two operating modes the main mode and the data&ase mode
The data&ase mode is used for the estimation of the cost of components and
services# while the main mode is used for the definition of the networ-
architecture# services and performing all calculations The TITA8 data&ase contains several sections"
ost components# containing all component specific information
=earning curve classes# which define a specific learning curve &ehaviour
Holume classes# which define a specific mar-et volume evolution
7AL> classes# which define a certain operations# administration and maintenance
9riteoff period class which defines a component lifetimes for calculation of depreciation
5ncertainty class# which defines the relative uncertainty for the ris- assessment
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
67/90
The o&ective of another @uropean proect# A22+/7PTI>5> was the calculation ofthe overall financial &udget of all -inds of access solutions
In result a networ-planning tool has &een developed# which ta-es into account" the
system cost# operation and maintenance costs# lifecycle costs and the cash &alance of
the proect
In the 7PTI>5> proect the networ- evolution costs are also considered* The tool
com&ines low level# detailed networ- parameters with high level parameters# which is
seen as the -ey feature of the 7PTI>5> methodology and the tool
The structure of the 7PTI>5> tool is shown in the igure 2*.
T@RA was a proect reali!ed within the AT< Programme ?142000$* ompared to
its predecessor# the T@RA tool aims at the study of architectures spanning the whole
telecom networ-# not only the access networ- part ?http"//wwwnrc*
no-ia*com/tonic/description/&g*htm$
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS
http://wwwnrc/http://wwwnrc/ -
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
68/90
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
69/90
The framewor- of the T@RA technoeconomic evaluations is shown inthe igure 2**
The geometric planning model is an optional part of the T@RA tool* The
model is used to estimate the amount of ca&le/fi&re and ducting re)uired
in the networ-7n the conceptual level the geometric model is a function that ta-es
several inputs such as su&scri&er density# networ- topology ?star# ring#
&us$# average ca&le over length# duct availa&ility# etc* and gives two
outputs# which are the total amount of ca&le/fi&re re)uired in the networ-
and the total amount of new duct re)uired*
The TITA8 networ- model is a part of the T@RA tool
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
70/90
ACCESS NETWORK PLANNING TOOLS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
71/90
ECONOMICAL MO+ELING O& PLANNINGMO+ELS
METHODOLOGY OF PLANNING MODELS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
72/90
A 6usiness Plan presents the calculation of the financial
indicators that ena&le the managers to evaluate the financial
performances of an enterprise in order to ta-e &est decisions
for the overall operation
ue to the high num&er of alternatives today and the need to
find economic feasi&ility in competition# the &usiness
evaluations are &eing used not only for the &usiness plan itself
&ut as an iterative evaluation of those technoeconomical
alternatives to select the ones that perform &etter in thecompetitive mar-et
BUSINESS PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
73/90
A &usiness plan summari!es the results of the planning process
The o&ectives to reach ? su&scri&ers demand# sales$
The future revenues epected from the plan and per service class
The planned epenses ?investment and operations$ as overall and perservice class
The accounting statements and the financial indicators characteri!ing
the profita&ility of the proect
The framewor- structure for the evaluation follows the model ofthe figure* @ach &o is epanded with more degree of detail as a
function of the plan time frame with the corresponding des
aggregation
BUSINESS PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
74/90
B#)!ne)) mo"el )tr#*t#re 2or plnn!ng
BUSINESS PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
75/90
@conomical modeling to evaluate networ- solutions ?modeling
tariffs# e)uipment costs per type# economy of scale# lifecycle#
e)uipment deployment# elasticity# trends with time$
ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
76/90
ue to the high num&er of new services and large variety ofmar-eting characteristics# one of the most interesting planning
activities when operating 8%8 is the economic modeling of the
services costs# revenues and profita&ility# either per single service or
for groups of services in the case of a &undle offer
The service related modelling is a su&set of the overall 8%8
economic modelling that represents with less detail the analysis of
technological variants and for a given networ- solution models with
more detail the demand# dimensioning# tariffs# revenues and
profita&ility of the services themselves
ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
77/90
In order to consider correctly the per service impacts on the
networ- and &usiness# it should &e differentiated in all
economic evaluations those values due to"
The overall operation company
The glo&al networ- solution
The &road&and platform needed for all new services
The specific platform for each service type
ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
78/90
>odelling and differentiation of resources# cost drivers# revenuedrivers with the corresponding cost allocation per service type is a
must for the -nowledge of impact from each service and to decide
the introduction strategy per service or service &undle
>aor cost drivers for multimedia service re)uire the evaluation of alldimensioning units li-e"
8um&er of 5sers
8um&er of 66 ports
AP< ?all Attempts Per
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
79/90
Those units# dimensioning and costing has to &e performed for thefollowing networ- resources"
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
80/90
7perational epenses also need to &e modeled with differentiation perservice type and service group# &oth for the technical operation#
maintenance# software upgrades as well as for the mar-eting# promotion#
training# etc* that will &e important at the first years of the new services
or all the common costs either due to 66 platforms as well as for common
networ- resources and overall company operation# a sharing factor has to
&e evaluated also as a function of partial consumed resources that will
aggregate to the specific cost
>aor revenue drivers for multimedia services need to consider the contract fee#
monthly fee and usage/traffic dependent fee# either in erlangs# >&s# time# delivery
unit ?ie" video film$ etc*
ue to confluence of many new multimedia services of heterogeneous types# it is
fundamental to -eep trac- of consumed resources per service type in order to &e a&le
to perform &ac-ward cost allocation as a function of utili!ation
ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
81/90
This will allow a latter calculation of proper tariffs to o&tain the serviceprofita&ility either for single services or services &undles and to ensure
fulfillment regulation principles when activity &ased costing is used
or those services provided in a shared mode &y multiple players# li-e
video content# gaming# etc* sharing factors among players have to &e
applied for the evaluation of glo&al revenues and partial revenues to &e
incorporated to the operator income
ecision ma-ing of which service is introduced first# which grouping or
services and for what customer types will &e function of the profita&ility
of those alternatives that have a high sensitivity to the services mi &y theeconomy of scale factors* That high impact on the economy of scale is the
main driver for convergence of services and the interest of Ctriple playD
and Dmultiple playD strategies
ECONOMIC MO+ELING &OR PLANNING
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
82/90
The telecom e)uipment and infrastructure have to &e installed at periodical intervals as afunction of the demand evolution
That intervals or provisioning periods for a given technology are a function of the demandgrowing rate# the systems capacity and modularity# the life cycle of the installed e)uipmentand the corresponding associated costs
The diagram &elow illustrates three provisioning scenarios for a given demand over time"
In scenario A# the provisioning is performed at short regular periods ?say yearly or )uarterly$ minimi!ing the spare
capacity &ut increasing the installation costs &y the high num&er of intervention' in addition an unepected demand
grow at higher rate will imply under provisioning and lost of )uality of service as well as of customers
In scenario 6# the provisioning is performed for the epected demand over a long period or Conce for allD with a
high startup cost in AP@N and high maintenance for an installed e)uipment with low utili!ation rate
In scenario # the num&er and volume of provisioning is optimi!ed to minimi!e ost of 7wnership that considers
&oth AP@N and 7P@N while maintaining ade)uate utili!ation rates and Muality of
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
83/90
The dynamic optimi!ation pro&lem in networ- planning ta-es carefor the optimum provisioning periods and volumes in order tominimi!e costs and is a function of the following parameters"
emand growing rate and forecast relia&ility
@)uipment capacity and modularity Technical life cycle and capa&ility to provide new services
@conomical lifecycle
@)uipment fied costs and incremental costs
7perational and maintenance costs
=a&our costs
Interest rate and inflation rate
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
MO+ERNIATION
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
84/90
In the case of availa&ility of new technologies of the samefunctionality with larger capacities or when new functionalitiesappear li-e in the networ- migration towards 8%8# the
decisions to &e ta-en &y the planner introduce additional
scenarios" Increase of capacity with same technology modularity ?ie" more 1
systems$ versus umping to the net technology modularity ?i"e"su&stituting 1 &y 4 or 1+$
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
85/90
Strteg!e) o2 net5or6 re)o#r*e) "eplo4ment **or"!ng to l!2e*4*le n" e*onom!*)
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
MO+ERNIATION
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
86/90
In these types of scenarios# in addition to the previous parameters# thepossi&ility to provide same services with additional su& networ-s andthe possi&ility to provide new services not feasi&le with installedtechnologies# introduce additional compleity in the technoeconomical evaluation &y the need to incorporate in the evaluation the
differential revenues &y those new services
Fey parameters that most influence on the decision are the degree ofe)uipment o&solescence or remaining time of the life cycle period# thenew customers grow rate and the epected cash flows &y the newservices
The evaluation process has to consider and compare the 8et PresentHalue ?8PH$ of potential alternatives with all costs and revenues peralternative with the discounted cash flows
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
MO+ERNIATION
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
87/90
The proper selection of those alternatives that" first fulfil theprofita&ility re)uirements and second provides &etter 8PH and
Internal Rate of Return "IRR# will give the decision to the planner on
the e)uili&rium &etween the amorti!ation versus moderni!ation or
su&stitution &y the new generation technology
The large variety of scenarios in actual networ-s do not allow a
generic recommendation# although it is common that in new
%reenfield areas and with o&solete e)uipment that has to &e
renovated anyhow it may &e recommended the installation of new
generation systems once all technical capa&ilities are availa&le andproved
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
MO+ERNIATION
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
88/90
Also it is fre)uent that for modern e)uipment with re)uiredfunctionalities and many years remaining to fulfil the life cycle#
su&stitution is delayed until economically feasi&le
This com&ination of decisions is called cap and gro$ and is the
more fre)uent today# &ut for every country# region and servicesdemand scenario# the 8PH and IRR have to &e evaluated in order to
ensure not only positive &usiness results &ut also results in line with
&enchmar-ing values in order to survive in a competitive
environment
CYCLE LI&E AMORTIATION %ERSUS
MO+ERNIATION
Q & A
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
89/90
Q & A
-
8/13/2019 Part 2.2 Methology Planning
90/90
Ce%e' o) Co%s*l$%+, $%d Te+(%olo&, T'$%s)e'
Research Institute of Posts And Telecommunication
Telep$one1 78 8 9 :;< =79/> 78 8 9 :;8 887