part 2 protection: the five pillars of disaster resilience
TRANSCRIPT
THE FIVE PILLARS OF
DISASTER RESILIENCE
Part 2: Protection
DISASTER RESILIENCE IS A FAILED
POLICY WITHOUT THE ADOPTION AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF FIVE
INTEGRATED POLICIES
(i.e., The Five Pillars of Disaster
Resilience)
YOUR
NATION
DATA BASES
AND INFORMATION
HAZARDS:GROUND SHAKING
GROUND FAILURE
SURFACE FAULTING
TECTONIC DEFORMATION
TSUNAMI RUN UP
AFTERSHOCKS
•MONITORING
•HAZARD MAPS
•INVENTORY
•VULNERABILITY
•LOCATIONR
RISK
ACCEPTABLE RISK
UNACCEPTABLE RISK
BOOKS OF
KNOWLEDGE
•PREPAREDNESS
•PROTECTION
•EARLY WARNING
•EM RESPONSE
•RECOVERY
5 PILLARS OF DISASTER
RESILIENCE
PROTECTION OF IMPORTANT
BUILDINGS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
IS AN ESSENTIAL PILLAR OF
DISASTER RESILIENCE
THE GOAL
DEMANDS ON
COMMUNITY
DISASTER
RESILIENCE:
CAPABILITIES OF
COMMUNITY
REALITY
UNANTICIPATED
DEMANDS ON
COMMUNITY
LACK OF DISASTER
RESILIENCE
INSUFFICIENT
PROTECTION OF
COMMUNITY BLDGS.
& INFRASTRUCTURE
WHAT IS PROTECTION?
(Protection is
a mandated state of robustness,
strength, and ductility for important
buildings and essential - critical
infrastructure to prevent loss of
function when a natural hazard ocurs
THE STATE-OF-PROTECTION IN
A COMMUNITY INCREASES AS A
COMMUNITY’S CAPABILITY TO
ANTICIPATE
WHAT WILL HAPPEN
INCREASES
WHAT IS PREPAREDNESS?
(Preparedness is
a state of readiness on individual,
urban, sub-regional, and national
scales that is sufficient to keep the
disaster agents of a natural hazard
from causing a disaster
THE STATE-OF-READINESS IN A
COMMUNITY INCREASES AS A
COMMUNITY’S CAPABILITY TO
ANTICIPATE
WHAT WILL HAPPEN
INCREASES
ANY COMMUNITY CAN
INCREASE ITS STATE-OF-
PROTECTION AGAINST THE
POTENTIAL DISASTER
AGENTS OF ANY NATURAL
HAZARD
ALL “PROTECTION ACTIVITIES” RELY ON
CAPABILITY TO ANTICIPATE
• HAZARD AND RISK ZONATION
(INUNDATION, GROUND SHAKING,
AND HIGH-VELOCITY WIND FIELDS)
• URBAN PLANNING (AVOIDANCE)
• CONSTRUCTION INCORPORATING
BUILDING CODES AND LIFELINE
STANDARDS
• SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN
ALL “PROTECTION ACTIVITIES” RELY ON
CAPABILITY TO ANTICIPATE
• ACTIVE AND PASSIVE ENERGY
DISSIPATION DEVICES (e.g., BASE
ISOLATION)
• PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
BASIC, ESSENTIAL, AND CRITICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE) …
WHAT NEEDS TO BE
ANTICIPATED?
• THE NATURAL HAZARD
(S) THAT IS/ARE MOST
LIKELY TO OCCUR?
• WHERE AND WHEN WILL
IT/THEY OCCUR?
• HOW STRONG WILL THE
POTENTIAL DISASTER
AGENTS OF EACH
HAZARD BE?
WHAT NEEDS TO BE
ANTICIPATED (Continued)?
• WHAT KINDS OF
BUILDINGS ARE AT RISK?
• WHAT KINDS OF BASIC,
ESSENTIAL, AND
CRITICAL INFRA-
STRUCTURE ARE AT
RISK?
• WHAT ARE THEIR
PHYSICAL VUL-
NERABILITIES
WHAT NEEDS TO BE
ANTICIPATED (Continued)?
• WHAT ARE THE LIKELY
SOCIAL VUL-
NERABILITIES
• WHAT IS THE LIKELY
DAMAGE DISTRIBUTION?
• WHAT ARE THE LIKELY
CASUALTIES, SOCIO-
ECONOMIC, AND
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS?
BUILDINGS NEEDING PROTECTION?
• HIGH-RISES
• SCHOOLS
• HOSPITALS
• MILITARY INSTALLATIONS
• THE CAPITOL
• THE LEGISLATURE
• TH PRESIDENTIAL PALACE
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDING
PROTECTION
• UTILITY SYSTEMS (GAS, POWER,
WATER)
• SEWAGE SYSTEMS
• PIPELINES
• TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
(HIGHWAYS, BRIDGES, TRANSIT,
AIRPORTS, …)
INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDING
PROTECTEION
• COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
• LEVEES AND DAMS
• POWER PLANTS
• NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
• HAZ MAT STORAGE TANKS
POTENTIAL DISASTER AGENTS TO
PROTECT AGAINST
• INUNDATION
• STRONG WIND FIELD
• STRONG GROUND SHAKING
• LIQUEFACTION
• LANDSLIDES
• FIRE
EXAMPLE 1: A NEED FOR
PROTECTION
• CHINA
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 2: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• EGYPT ASWAN
HIGH DAM: PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 3: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• ALGERIA
(ALGIERS, A
CAPITAL CITY):
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 3: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• ALGERIA
(BOUMEDES)
AFTER
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 4: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• ITALY (IRPINIA)
AFTER
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 5: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• OKLAHOMA, USA
HOSPITAL AFTER
TORNADO:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 6: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• JAPAN ELEVATED
EXPRESSWAY
AFTER EARTH-
QUAKE: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 7: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND BAY
BRIDGE AFTER
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 8: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• SAN FRANCISCO
CITY HALL (BASE
ISOLATION):
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 9: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• ARIZONA, USA
AQUEDUCT:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 10: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• SAN FRANCISCO
INT’L AIRPORT
(BASE ISOLATION):
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 11: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• CHILE HIGHWAY
SYSTEM: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 12: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• NEW ORLEANS
AFTER HUR-
RICANE KATRINA:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 13: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• CHILE
INUNDATION:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 14: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• CHINA (YA’AN
CITY) AFTER
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 15: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• GULF OF MEXICO
OIL RIG: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 16: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• PAKISTAN
COLLAPSED
BUILDINGS AFTER
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 17: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• HAITI
PRESIDENTIAL
PALACE AFTER
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 18: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• JAPAN
FUKUSHIMA
NUCLEAR POWER
PLANT: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 19: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• MEXICO (MEXICO
CITY AND “POPO):
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 20: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”E
• PERU BRIDGE
AFTER LAND-
SLIDE): PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 21: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• USA INTERSTATE
HWY 44 IN-
UNDATED:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 22: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• JAPAN ELEVATED
EXPRESSWAY
AFTER EARTH-
QUAKE: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 23: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• CHINA BEIJING
(CAPITAL CITY)
AFTER FLOOD:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 24: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”E
• PERU BRIDGE
AFTER LAND-
SLIDE): PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 25: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• USA INTERSTATE
HWY 44 IN-
UNDATED:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 26: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• CHINA THREE
GORGES DAM:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 27: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• ALASKA USA
SCHOOL: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 28: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• TENNESSEE (USA)
ELEVATED
RAILROAD BRIDGE
DURING A FLOOD:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 29: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• SRI LANKA AFTER
TSUNAMI WAVE
RUN UP: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 30: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• RUSSUA WILDFIRE
NEAR THE
KREMLIN: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 31: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• AUSTRALIA
(QUEENSLAND) A
FLOOD: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 32: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• AMERICAN SAMOA
TSUNAMI WAVE
RUN UP: PROPER
PRIOR PRO-
TECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 33: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• TRINIDAD-
TOBAGO FLOOD:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 34: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• JAPAN TSUNAMI
WAVE RUN UP:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
EXAMPLE 35: A NEED FOR
“PROTECTION”
• RUSSIA
EARTHQUAKE:
PROPER PRIOR
PROTECTION
PREVENTS POOR
PERFORMANCE
CONCLUSION
With Today’s Books of
Knowledge, Innovative Capacity
Building to
Protect Important Buildings and
Basic, essential, and
Critical, Infrastructure is possible.