parent survey report – november 2019 report.pdf · this report details the findings of the fifth...
TRANSCRIPT
The Skinners' School
Parent survey report – November 2019
In case of enquiries please contact Kirkland Rowell Surveys by emailing [email protected] © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited.
Kirkland Rowell is part of GL Assessment, a division of the GL Education Group.
Report generated on 07/01/2020
Parent survey report
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 2 of 91
Contents
Page
1. Executive summary An overview of findings for this survey with comparison to theprevious survey if applicable.
3
2. Key results Satisfaction levels for academic, non-academic and additionalcriteria.
11
3. Parental priorities Importance ratings and priorities for improvement. 22
4. Unique questions Analysis of your unique questions. 28
5. Parent View summary Your survey data linked to the 12 questions in Ofsted’s ParentView.
31
6. Ofsted self-evaluation summary Linking your survey data to the current Ofsted evaluation schedule. 33
7. Unexpected results Highlighting any particularly unusual or unexpected results. 46
8. Standard analysis Analysis of all remaining data which may include academic stretch,healthy lifestyle, parental values and homework.
49
9. Year group analysis Year group scores compared to national averages. 66
10. Time series analysis Trends for surveyed criteria over time. 75
11. Appendix Supplementary data and further information. 82
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 3 of 91
Executive summaryThis report details the findings of the fifth Kirkland Rowell Parent Survey for The Skinners' School. The reportmeasures the levels of satisfaction among the students’ parents for a range of criteria, which have beenpreviously identified as being important to the parents of school students, as well as for the core subjects,taught at the school. The report measures the relative importance of the criteria surveyed, as well as providingresults tables that identify the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the school in the year to November2019. The report also measures performance with regard to overall satisfaction and improvement.
Summary of results for this survey
• 628 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 57.7%. The response meantthat meaningful data could be drawn for all criteria except for PE AS Level and Psychology.
• 11 parents answered ‘Yes’ and 598 parents answered ‘No’ to the question ‘Has your child ever been eligiblefor free school meals during the last six years?’ representing 1.8% and 95.2% respectively.
• The parents gave an excellent overall performance score (88.0%) (see page 6).
• Of the parents whose children were not in their first year at the school 24% said the school had improvedover the last year and 2% thought that the school’s performance was worse (see page 49).
• Of the parents of new students, 4% felt that the school had not lived up to their expectations and 33% saidthe school was better than they had expected it to be (see page 49).
• With regard to academic subjects, parents are most happy with the delivery of Philosophy & Ethics, TheatreStudies and Government & Politics.
• The parents are least happy with the delivery of EPQ, Computer Science and Classics.
• With regards to non-academic areas, parents are most happy with Developing moral values, Schooldiscipline and Careers advice.
• The parents are least happy with Availability of resources, Computer access and School facilities.
• The parents' top priorities for improvement are Availability of resources, School facilities and Developingpotential.
Summary of results since the previous survey
• The following academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: TheatreStudies, Chemistry, Art, Economics, Music and Design Technology.
• The following academic areas received significantly lower scores than the previous survey: Co-ordinatedScience and German.
• The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Choice ofsubjects and School facilities.
• The following non-academic areas received significantly lower scores than the previous survey: Control ofbullying, Happiness of child, Computer access and Availability of resources.
• The following additional area received significantly higher scores than the previous survey: Out of schoolactivities and clubs.
Summary of results over more than two surveys
• The following academic areas received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: French,Geography, History, ICT, Design Technology and Religious Studies.
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 4 of 91
• The following academic area received significantly lower scores over more than two surveys: German.
• The following non-academic areas received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Schoolfacilities, Social health education, School security, Careers advice, Developing moral values, Communityspirit and Choice of subjects.
• The following additional area received significantly higher scores over more than two surveys: Out of schoolactivities and clubs.
• The survey has achieved a good benchmark of performance against which future academic years might becompared.
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 5 of 91
Strengths and weaknesses
The results below are the areas in which the school has the highest and lowest perceived standards ofperformance. Gold represents ‘outstanding’, green is ‘good’, black is ‘room for improvement’ and red is‘attention advised’. Criterion scores in blue are only reliable to within 10% and scores in pink should only beconsidered indicative.
Relative strengths for academic criteria97.4% Philosophy & Ethics
95.3% Theatre Studies
86.0% Government & Politics
85.2% Business Studies
82.8% Chemistry
Relative weaknesses for academic criteria63.3% EPQ
68.7% Computer Science
69.9% Classics
72.2% German
73.1% P. E.
Relative strengths for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking84.3% Developing moral values (65.1%) 8th
83.9% School discipline (85.3%) 5th
83.8% Careers advice (26.8%) 15th
82.6% Community spirit (35.4%) 12th
81.7% Control of bullying (58.0%) 9th
Relative weaknesses for non-academic criteria Importance Ranking59.8% Availability of resources (24.5%) 17th
63.9% Computer access (8.7%) 19th
72.7% School facilities (37.7%) 11th
73.0% School security (25.0%) 16th
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 6 of 91
Response to survey
628 completed questionnaires were returned representing a response rate of 57.7%.
Proportion of responses (%) Number of responses
Responses from parents of Year 7 students 19.0 105
Responses from parents of Year 8 students 18.3 101
Responses from parents of Year 9 students 17.9 99
Responses from parents of Year 10 students 14.6 81
Responses from parents of Year 11 students 15.9 88
Responses from parents of 6th Form students 14.3 79
Overall parental satisfaction
This survey (%)Previous
survey (%)Change (%)
Overall, rate the performance of the school 88.0 90.6 -2.5
Rating ‘poor’or ‘very
poor’ (%)
Previoussurvey (%)
% ChangeRating ‘good’
or ‘verygood’ (%)
Overall, rate the performance of the school 0.6 0.2 +0.4 94.5
Overall parental satisfaction
0% 0%
5%
36%
58%
Very poor Poor Neither Good Very good0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
• More parents rate the overall performance of the school as ‘good’ or ‘very good’.
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 7 of 91
Overall performance scores broken down by year group
Overall performance scores
This survey Last survey
88%91%
All parents0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• The parents gave an excellent overall performance score of 88.0%, declined since the last survey.
Overall performance scores broken down by year group
88%86% 86% 87%
90% 89%
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• Parents of Year 11 students scored the highest overall from other year groups and are therefore mostsatisfied with the school’s performance.
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 8 of 91
Time series analysis of overall performance scores
Graph showing the overall performance scores trend broken down over time.
84%82%
90% 91%88%
2005 2007 2009 2012 20200%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• There was no significant change over five surveys for the overall performance score.
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 9 of 91
Overall performance scores broken down by extra analysis
Broken down by the question ‘Has your child ever been eligible for free school meals during the last six years?’
88%
93%
88%
All parents Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• The overall performance scores show no significant difference.
Broken down by the question ‘Does the school fully develop pupils' potential?’
88%
92%
72%
All parents Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• The overall performance scores show significant difference.
Parent survey report – Executive summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 10 of 91
Parents recommend this school broken down by year group
Recommend this school scores
This survey Last survey
97% 100%
All parents0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• 97.2% of parents said they would recommend this school to another parent.
Recommend this school scores broken down by year group
97% 96% 96% 100% 99% 96%
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• Parents of Year 10 students would recommend this school to another parent more than parents from otheryear groups.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 11 of 91
Key resultsThe core analysis of your survey data; Proportion making progress for academic, non-academic and additionalcriteria. Explanations have been provided to help you to interpret your results.
Interpreting results
For the sake of assessment in most schools, academic questions receiving a score of:
• Over 80% are 'outstanding' (above the gold line)
• 70% to 79.9% are 'good' (above the green line)
• 65% to 69.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line)
• Below 65% indicate 'attention advised' (below the red line)
Non-academic and additional questions receiving a score of:
• Over 75% are 'outstanding' (above the gold line)
• 65% to 74.9% are 'good' (above the green line)
• 60% to 64.9% indicate 'room for improvement' (above the red line)
• Below 60% indicate 'attention advised' (below the red line)
Weighted scoresIn the results tables the scores achieved are given as a percentage. A full explanation of how mean scores(lying between 1 and 5) were converted to percentages is given on our website. As there is a measurablebias in the way that parents score criteria, it is necessary to create “weighted” scores so that the score forany one criterion might be compared meaningfully with the score for any other criterion on a ‘level playingfield’. These weighted scores are calculated based upon the average scores achieved from over 380 similar,English schools. Results quoted from the previous survey, if applicable, may show small differences from thoseoriginally given, as the weightings applied change slightly from one year to the next.
Statistical reliabilityGenerally all of our results are quoted as being reliable to within less than 5% at the 95% confidence level.Where this is not possible due to the sample achieved, results are quoted as reliable to within less than 10%at the 95% confidence level and are highlighted in blue. Occasionally when results are even less reliablewe show an indicative result and highlight in pink. Where there are fewer than 10 responses we only show“low response” and no further result is quoted. For further information see our website for details. Criteriawhich have not yet been surveyed in at least 30 schools do not yet have an average figure, and therefore,these scores cannot be weighted against what students parents ‘usually’ say. These un-weighted scores aremarked *.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 12 of 91
Understanding your results table
Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
ICT 86.2 82.8 +3.4
French 82.6 80.9 +1.7
Religious Education 72.4 66.1 +6.3
Physical Education 72.3 69.6 +2.7
Music 72.1 68.3 +3.8
Food Technology 71.4 71.7 -0.3
History 70.8 65.0 +5.8
Mathematics 70.1 69.4 +0.7
Geography 69.9 64.9 +5.0
Business Studies 67.2
Design Technology 67.2 62.1 +5.1
Art 66.5 65.4 +1.1
Textiles 66.3
English 65.5 62.8 +2.7
Russian * 64.3
Science 62.1 74.8 -12.7
Drama 61.5 63.4 -1.9
Engineering 49.5
Psychology Low response
Your results are shown as a weightedmean score. This is a calculationapplied to your raw results usingthe average scores achieved fromover 380 similar, English schools. Itallows each criterion to be comparedmeaningfully on a ‘level playing field’.This score can be over 100%.
The previous survey results mayappear to differ slightly from youroriginal report last year. This isbecause the “weighting” calculationapplied changes slightly from oneyear to the next.
Scores above the goldline are ‘outstanding’.
Scores above the greenline are ‘good’.
Scores above the redline indicate 'room forimprovement'.
* This criteria has not yetbeen surveyed in at least 30schools. As such we do nothave an average figure andtherefore cannot weight thisscore against what studentsparents ‘usually’ say.
Scores below the redline indicate 'attentionadvised'.
“Low response” indicatesthat there were fewerthan 10 responses.
Subject scores in pinkshould only be consideredindicative due to a lowsample size, or highpolarisation.
Subject scores in blueare only reliable to within10% due to the sampleachieved.
Only highlighted changes shouldbe considered significant – agreen highlight shows a significantimprovement, a red highlight showsa significant decline, since the lastsurvey.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 13 of 91
Academic criteria
The following table shows parents’ scores for all academic subjects taught within the school. Where data isavailable, these are compared to the same score from the previous year’s survey, and the percentage changeshown. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant.
Academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
Philosophy & Ethics 97.4
Theatre Studies 95.3 82.3 +13.1
Government & Politics 86.0
Business Studies 85.2
Chemistry 82.8 76.9 +5.9
Religious Studies 82.6 78.5 +4.0
Mathematics 82.1 80.3 +1.9
STEM 81.9 85.5 -3.7
History 80.6 77.6 +2.9
Physics 80.5 84.3 -3.8
Drama 80.0 82.3 -2.3
French 79.6 77.5 +2.1
P.S.H.E 79.4 85.7 -6.3
ICT 78.8 73.5 +5.3
English 78.6 80.4 -1.8
Geography 77.7 75.8 +1.9
Art 77.4 72.2 +5.2
Economics 77.3 66.2 +11.1
Music 76.5 71.0 +5.5
Biology 75.7 78.4 -2.7
Co-ordinated Science 75.2 85.5 -10.4
Design Technology 74.8 67.7 +7.1
Games 73.4 68.3 +5.1
P. E. 73.1
German 72.2 77.6 -5.4
Classics 69.9
Computer Science 68.7 73.5 -4.8
EPQ * 63.3
PE AS Level Low response
Psychology Low response
• Parents consider delivery of the following academic subjects to be ‘outstanding’: Philosophy & Ethics,Theatre Studies, Government & Politics, Business Studies, Chemistry, Religious Studies, Mathematics,STEM, History and Physics.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 14 of 91
• Parents consider delivery of the following academic subjects to be ‘good’: Drama, French, P.S.H.E, ICT,English, Geography, Art, Economics, Music, Biology, Co-ordinated Science, Design Technology, Games, P.E. and German.
• Parents consider delivery of the following academic subjects to show ‘room for improvement’: Classics andComputer Science.
• Parents consider delivery of the following academic subjects to show ‘attention advised’: EPQ.
• Parents consider delivery of the following academic subjects to have shown a significant improvement sincethe last survey: Theatre Studies, Chemistry, Art, Economics, Music and Design Technology.
• Parents consider delivery of the following academic subjects to have declined since the last survey: Co-ordinated Science and German.
• The following academic subjects have not been surveyed in at least 30 schools so we do not yet have anaverage figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students parents usually say:EPQ.
• The following academic subject achieved a low sample; therefore scores are only reliable within 10%:Computer Science.
• The following academic subject achieved a very low sample; therefore scores should only be consideredindicative: Philosophy & Ethics, Theatre Studies, Government & Politics, Business Studies, EPQ, PE ASLevel and Psychology.
• The following academic subjects were not surveyed in the previous year’s survey so we do not haveprevious survey data to compare them to: Philosophy & Ethics, Government & Politics, Business Studies, P.E., Classics and EPQ.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 15 of 91
Happy versus unhappy parents for academic criteria
Judging performance based solely on the mean score allows for error: It is possible that the views of parentsmight be polarised so that positive and negative scores cancel each other out. It is therefore useful to conducta method of analysis which identifies the proportion of parents who are unhappy with the school’s performancefor the criteria surveyed.
The following table identifies the percentage of parents who are unhappy (rating poor or very poor) alongsidethose who are happy (rating ‘good’ or ‘very good’) for the school’s performance in each area. Note that theseresults do not include respondents who chose ‘neither good nor poor’, ‘I don’t know’ or failed to answer thequestion.
• Having fewer than 2% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered‘outstanding’ (above the gold line).
• Having between 2% & 4.9% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered as‘good’ (above the green line).
• Having between 5% & 10% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered asshowing ‘room for improvement’ (above the red line).
• Having more than 10% of parents unhappy with a particular area may suggest ‘attention advised’ (below thered line).
Only highlighted changes should be considered significant; green shows improvement, red shows decline.
Academic criteriaRating ‘poor’ or‘very poor’ (%)
Previoussurvey (%)
% ChangeRating ‘good’
or ‘verygood’ (%)
Drama 0.8 1.0 -0.2 82.8
History 0.8 1.2 -0.3 92.3
STEM 1.4 0.0 +1.4 88.7
Games 1.7 8.3 -6.6 69.5
P.S.H.E 2.3 0.0 +2.3 73.1
Art 2.6 3.1 -0.5 82.5
Design Technology 2.8 8.0 -5.2 83.4
French 2.9 3.9 -1.0 83.3
P. E. 2.9 79.9
Religious Studies 3.1 1.4 +1.7 86.9
Geography 3.4 4.3 -0.8 87.0
Music 3.5 5.7 -2.2 74.0
English 3.5 2.5 +1.1 88.1
Mathematics 3.5 4.6 -1.0 90.1
ICT 4.6 5.5 -1.0 76.6
Economics 4.6 9.0 -4.4 79.3
Chemistry 4.6 6.3 -1.7 86.6
Biology 5.6 3.6 +2.0 79.1
Classics 5.7 78.7
Physics 6.6 0.9 +5.8 81.9
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 16 of 91
Academic criteriaRating ‘poor’ or‘very poor’ (%)
Previoussurvey (%)
% ChangeRating ‘good’
or ‘verygood’ (%)
German 10.8 3.0 +7.8 76.2
Co-ordinated Science 10.9 0.0 +10.9 78.8
Computer Science 19.5 5.5 +14.0 63.3
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 17 of 91
Non-academic criteria
The following table shows parents priorities for non-academic areas. Where data is available, these arecompared to the same score from the previous year’s survey, and the percentage change shown. Onlyhighlighted changes should be considered significant.
Non-academic criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
Developing moral values 84.3 83.3 +1.0
School discipline 83.9 84.2 -0.3
Careers advice 83.8 78.8 +5.1
Community spirit 82.6 81.6 +1.0
Control of bullying 81.7 87.6 -5.9
Developing confidence 81.2 81.9 -0.7
Caring teachers 80.8 81.2 -0.5
School communication 80.4 82.9 -2.5
Developing potential 80.4 83.5 -3.2
Teaching quality 79.3 79.6 -0.4
Happiness of child 78.4 83.8 -5.4
Exam results 77.7 81.6 -3.9
Social health education 77.2 75.0 +2.2
Levels of homework 76.8 77.0 -0.2
Truancy control 76.3 78.4 -2.1
Choice of subjects 75.5 70.5 +5.0
School security 73.0 72.4 +0.5
School facilities 72.7 67.4 +5.3
Computer access 63.9 71.3 -7.4
Availability of resources 59.8 73.8 -13.9
• Parents consider delivery of the following non-academic areas to be ‘outstanding’: Developing moral values,School discipline, Careers advice, Community spirit, Control of bullying, Developing confidence, Caringteachers, School communication, Developing potential, Teaching quality, Happiness of child, Exam results,Social health education, Levels of homework, Truancy control and Choice of subjects.
• Parents consider delivery of the following non-academic areas to be ‘good’: School security and Schoolfacilities.
• Parents consider delivery of the following non-academic areas to show ‘room for improvement’: Computeraccess.
• Parents consider delivery of the following non-academic areas to show ‘attention advised’: Availability ofresources.
• Parents consider delivery of the following non-academic subjects to have shown a significant improvementsince the last survey: Choice of subjects and School facilities.
• Parents consider delivery of the following non-academic subjects to have declined since the last survey:Control of bullying, Happiness of child, Computer access and Availability of resources.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 18 of 91
Happy versus unhappy parents for non-academic criteria
The following table identifies the percentage of parents who are unhappy (rating poor or very poor) alongsidethose who are happy (rating ‘good’ or ‘very good’) for the school’s performance in each area. Note that theseresults do not include respondents who chose ‘neither good nor poor’, ‘I don’t know’ or failed to answer thequestion.
• Having fewer than 2% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered‘outstanding’ (above the gold line).
• Having between 2% & 4.9% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered as‘good’ (above the green line).
• Having between 5% & 15% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered asshowing ‘room for improvement’ (above the red line).
• Having more than 15% of parents unhappy with a particular area may suggest ‘attention advised’ (below thered line).
Only highlighted changes should be considered significant; green shows improvement, red shows decline.
Non-academic criteriaRating ‘poor’ or‘very poor’ (%)
Previoussurvey (%)
% ChangeRating ‘good’
or ‘verygood’ (%)
Truancy control 0.7 0.6 +0.1 94.4
Exam results 0.8 1.7 -0.9 90.6
Teaching quality 1.1 0.8 +0.3 90.2
School discipline 1.3 0.4 +0.9 93.2
Developing moral values 1.7 1.7 0.0 88.2
Caring teachers 2.6 1.4 +1.2 90.4
Choice of subjects 2.8 2.8 +0.0 87.8
Social health education 3.0 2.5 +0.5 79.7
School facilities 3.2 3.6 -0.4 81.1
Happiness of child 3.3 1.5 +1.8 88.0
Developing potential 3.4 3.0 +0.4 82.8
Developing confidence 3.5 2.5 +1.0 86.1
Community spirit 3.6 4.2 -0.6 81.8
School security 3.8 3.6 +0.2 81.8
Control of bullying 5.0 1.8 +3.2 86.0
Careers advice 7.7 7.8 -0.1 72.3
Computer access 7.9 2.5 +5.4 65.9
Levels of homework 8.1 7.4 +0.7 75.4
School communication 8.1 3.3 +4.8 81.3
Availability of resources 17.9 3.6 +14.3 51.7
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 19 of 91
Additional criteria
Additional criteria were chosen by the school, and investigated with regard to parent satisfaction. The followingresults were achieved with regard to those parents who answered the question. The percentage scores aregiven in descending order. Only highlighted changes should be considered significant.
Additional criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) % Change
Encouraging and listening to pupils' views 83.9 80.2 +3.8
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 80.7 81.3 -0.6
Access to staff 80.5
Out of school activities and clubs 78.5 65.7 +12.8
Ensuring pupils do their best/make goodprogress
78.1 79.6 -1.5
Looking after pupils well 77.8 79.4 -1.6
Making sure that new pupils settle in well 77.8 78.9 -1.1
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff 77.6
Appropriate level of challenge inhomework
76.2
Written reports 76.2 80.5 -4.3
Regular marking of work 75.6 78.0 -2.4
Pupils' attitudes to learning 75.3
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.2 73.8 +1.4
Quality of feedback on pupil's work 74.8
Promoting racial harmony 74.3
Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs* 73.3
Unexpected costs or expenses 72.8
E-safety 72.2
Teaching pupils with special needs 71.7 81.9 -10.2
• Parents consider delivery of the following additional criteria to be ‘outstanding’: Encouraging and listening topupils' views, Treating all pupils fairly/equally, Access to staff, Out of school activities and clubs, Ensuringpupils do their best/make good progress, Looking after pupils well, Making sure that new pupils settle inwell, Attitude of non-teaching/support staff, Appropriate level of challenge in homework, Written reports,Regular marking of work, Pupils' attitudes to learning and Celebrating and rewarding achievement.
• Parents consider delivery of the following additional criteria to be ‘good’: Quality of feedback on pupil's work,Promoting racial harmony, Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs, Unexpected costs or expenses, E-safetyand Teaching pupils with special needs.
• Parents consider delivery of the following additional criteria to have shown a significant improvement sincethe last survey: Out of school activities and clubs.
• The following additional criteria have not been surveyed in at least 30 schools so we do not yet have anaverage figure, and therefore, these scores cannot be weighted against what students parents usually say:Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs.
• The following additional criteria were not surveyed in the previous year’s survey so we do not have previoussurvey data to compare them to: Access to staff, Attitude of non-teaching/support staff, Appropriate level of
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 20 of 91
challenge in homework, Pupils' attitudes to learning, Quality of feedback on pupil's work, Promoting racialharmony, Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs, Unexpected costs or expenses and E-safety.
Parent survey report – Key results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 21 of 91
Happy versus unhappy parents for additional criteria
The following table identifies the percentage of parents who are unhappy (rating poor or very poor) alongsidethose who are happy (rating ‘good’ or ‘very good’) for the school’s performance in each area. Note that theseresults do not include respondents who chose ‘neither good nor poor’, ‘I don’t know’ or failed to answer thequestion.
• Having fewer than 2% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered‘outstanding’ (above the gold line).
• Having between 2% & 4.9% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered as‘good’ (above the green line).
• Having between 5% & 15% of parents who are unhappy with a particular area should be considered asshowing ‘room for improvement’ (above the red line).
• Having more than 15% of parents unhappy with a particular area may suggest ‘attention advised’ (below thered line).
Only highlighted changes should be considered significant; green shows improvement, red shows decline.
Additional criteriaRating ‘poor’ or‘very poor’ (%)
Previoussurvey (%)
% ChangeRating ‘good’
or ‘verygood’ (%)
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff 0.8 92.4
Making sure that new pupils settle in well 1.1 0.7 +0.4 92.7
Encouraging and listening to pupils' views 1.3 4.4 -3.1 82.4
Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs 1.4 82.6
Looking after pupils well 1.5 0.6 +0.9 90.2
Pupils' attitudes to learning 1.6 86.1
E-safety 2.0 85.5
Promoting racial harmony 2.1 86.2
Written reports 3.5 1.8 +1.6 82.0
Access to staff 4.2 83.2
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 4.3 4.1 +0.3 84.0
Out of school activities and clubs 4.4 11.4 -7.0 81.6
Ensuring pupils do their best/make goodprogress
4.6 3.2 +1.4 83.0
Appropriate level of challenge inhomework
4.9 78.8
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 5.4 3.9 +1.5 80.9
Unexpected costs or expenses 6.1 60.9
Quality of feedback on pupil's work 9.1 68.7
Regular marking of work 10.1 4.8 +5.3 70.3
Teaching pupils with special needs 11.8 7.2 +4.6 66.4
Parent survey report – Parental priorities
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 22 of 91
Parental prioritiesParents were asked to choose the ten criteria which were most important to them from a list of twenty. Thissection shows the analysis of these importance ratings and of the priorities for improvement.
Parental priorities importance
Ideally those criteria which are most important to parents will be the criteria to which parents award the highestscores. In the following table, the second column shows the percentage of parents who chose each of thecriteria as one of their ten choices of what they felt was most important to them. The third column showshow well the school performs for the criteria ie. 1st = what the school does best, 20th = what the school doesleast well. Only highlighted rankings should be considered as being worthy of note. A green highlight showsthat the school performs well within a criterion that is important to parents, a red highlight shows that theschool performs less well within a criterion that is important to parents. The final two columns show the sameinformation for the previous survey, for comparison.
CriteriaImportancescore (%)
Satisfactionranking
Previousimportancescore (%)
Previoussatisfaction
ranking
Teaching quality 92.9 10th 95.9 11th
Happiness of child 89.0 11th 90.0 3rd
Developing potential 88.0 9th 87.2 4th
Developing confidence 86.4 6th 83.3 7th
School discipline 85.3 2nd 91.3 2nd
Caring teachers 77.4 7th 84.2 10th
School communication 66.4 8th 61.8 6th
Developing moral values 65.1 1st 66.4 5th
Control of bullying 58.0 5th 61.8 1st
Exam results 55.7 12th 59.2 8th
School facilities 37.7 18th 33.0 20th
Community spirit 35.4 4th 24.5 9th
Choice of subjects 30.9 16th 29.5 19th
Levels of homework 30.8 14th 29.3 14th
Careers advice 26.8 3rd 27.8 12th
School security 25.0 17th 25.2 17th
Availability of resources 24.5 20th 29.9 16th
Social health education 12.5 13th 7.8 15th
Computer access 8.7 19th 12.6 18th
Truancy control 3.5 15th 5.2 13th
With regard to the five criteria most important to parents:
• The school performs well in: School discipline.
Parent survey report – Parental priorities
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 23 of 91
Importance: your school vs. similar schools
Parents were asked to choose ten priorities from a list of twenty criteria. The table below shows which criteriathe parents from your school selected as most important. The second column shows you the percentage ofparents who selected each criterion as one of their ten choices, and the final column compares your school’sdata to the views from parents from similar schools. Position differences of four or more have been highlightedas being worthy of note.
CriteriaImportancescore (%)
Importanceranking
Averageranking
for similarschools
Rankingdifferenceto similarschools
Teaching quality 92.9 1st 1st 0
Happiness of child 89.0 2nd 3rd +1
Developing potential 88.0 3rd 4th +1
Developing confidence 86.4 4th 6th +2
School discipline 85.3 5th 2nd -3
Caring teachers 77.4 6th 5th -1
School communication 66.4 7th 8th +1
Developing moral values 65.1 8th 9th +1
Control of bullying 58.0 9th 7th -2
Exam results 55.7 10th 10th 0
School facilities 37.7 11th 11th 0
Community spirit 35.4 12th 17th +5
Choice of subjects 30.9 13th 13th 0
Levels of homework 30.8 14th 14th 0
Careers advice 26.8 15th 16th +1
School security 25.0 16th 12th -4
Availability of resources 24.5 17th 15th -2
Social health education 12.5 18th 20th +2
Computer access 8.7 19th 18th -1
Truancy control 3.5 20th 19th -1
• Most of the criteria the parents from your school selected as important are in line with the criteria thatparents of similar schools select as important.
• Parents from your school selected the following criteria as more important than parents at similar schools:Community spirit.
• Parents from your school selected the following criteria as less important than parents at similar schools:School security.
Parent survey report – Parental priorities
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 24 of 91
How parent priorities change as students get older
The graph below shows which criteria parents of Year 7 students selected as important compared to whichcriteria parents of Year 11 & 6th Form students selected as important. This shows us how parent prioritieschange as the students get older. The table shows the criteria where there is a significant difference betweenthe two groups.
Parent priorities
Year 7 Year 11 & 6th Form
Teach
ing q
uality
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Caring
teac
hers
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Develo
ping
mor
al
value
s
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Exam
resu
lts
Comm
unity
spirit
Schoo
l facil
ities
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Availa
bility
of
reso
urce
s
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Schoo
l sec
urity
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Caree
rs a
dvice
Truan
cy co
ntro
l0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Criteria where differencein score is significant
Year 7 ranking Year 11 & 6th Form ranking
Control of bullying 7th 10th
Exam results 10th 9th
Careers advice 19th 13th
Parent survey report – Parental priorities
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 25 of 91
How parent priorities change – extra analysis
The graph below shows which criteria were important to parents, broken down by their response to thequestion ‘Has your child ever been eligible for free school meals during the last six years?’. The table showsthe criteria where there is a significant difference between the two groups.
Parent priorities
Yes No
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Teach
ing q
uality
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Caring
teac
hers
Exam
resu
lts
Develo
ping
mor
al
value
s
Availa
bility
of
reso
urce
s
Comm
unity
spirit
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Schoo
l facil
ities
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Caree
rs a
dvice
Schoo
l sec
urity
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Compu
ter a
cces
s0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Criteria where differencein score is significant
Yes ranking No ranking
Developing confidence 1st 4th
School discipline 1st 5th
Parent survey report – Parental priorities
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 26 of 91
How parent priorities change – extra analysis
The graph below shows which criteria were important to parents, broken down by their response to thequestion ‘Does the school fully develop pupils' potential?’. The table shows the criteria where there is asignificant difference between the two groups.
Parent priorities
Yes No
Teach
ing q
uality
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Caring
teac
hers
Develo
ping
mor
al
value
s
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Exam
resu
lts
Comm
unity
spirit
Schoo
l facil
ities
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Schoo
l sec
urity
Availa
bility
of
reso
urce
s
Caree
rs a
dvice
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Truan
cy co
ntro
l0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Criteria where differencein score is significant
Yes ranking No ranking
School discipline 3rd 5th
Developing potential 5th 1st
Developing moral values 7th 10th
School communication 8th 5th
Parent survey report – Parental priorities
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 27 of 91
Relative parent priorities for improvement
Parent priorities are shown below compared to parent priorities in similar schools. The school’s previous yearsfigures are also provided for comparison.
Criteria This survey (%) Previous survey (%) Similar schools (%)
Availability of resources 13.7 5.4 3.1
School facilities 13.5 18.5 8.1
Developing potential 11.4 7.7 11.3
Levels of homework 9.2 11.3 6.4
School communication 8.9 7.6 10.2
Teaching quality 7.9 11.5 13.0
Developing confidence 7.6 6.3 5.6
Choice of subjects 6.0 13.9 4.2
Careers advice 3.1 5.4 6.5
Control of bullying 3.0 1.5 5.2
Computer access 2.5 3.2 1.8
Exam results 2.3 0.0 2.9
Happiness of child 2.3 0.2 3.9
Community spirit 2.3 2.2 1.7
School security 1.8 2.4 1.9
Developing moral values 1.4 0.4 2.1
School discipline 1.3 0.6 7.1
Social health education 1.0 1.3 0.9
Caring teachers 0.8 0.5 3.5
Truancy control 0.0 0.0 0.5
• Parents have given a higher priority to the following areas since the last survey: Availability of resources.
• Parents have given a lower priority to the following areas since the last survey: School facilities and Choiceof subjects.
• Parents have given a higher priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: Availability ofresources and School facilities.
• Parents have given a lower priority to the following areas compared to similar schools: Teaching quality andSchool discipline.
Parent survey report – Unique questions
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 28 of 91
Unique questionsResults for your unique questions are shown below.
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘What do you think of the school's attitude towards pupil well-being?’
49%
39%
8%
1% 0%
3%
Very positive Quite positive Neither positive,nor negative
Quite negative Very negative No answer0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Per
cent
age
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘What do you think about the quality and effectiveness of careers advice?’
12%
33%
35%
5%
2%
12%
Very effective Quite effective Neither Quite ineffective Very ineffective No answer0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Unique questions
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 29 of 91
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘What do you think of how the school looks after pupils who need extrapastoral support?’
20%
31%
29%
3%
0%
16%
Very good Good Neither Poor Very poor No answer0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Per
cent
age
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘Does the school fully develop pupils' potential?’
72%
18%
10%
Yes No No answer0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Unique questions
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 30 of 91
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘How do we deal with complaints?’
12%
30%
47%
4%2%
5%
Better than Iexpected
As I expected I don't know Not as Iexpected
Worse than Iexpected
No answer0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Parent View summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 31 of 91
Parent View summaryBelow are the twelve "Parent View" questions. For each of the questions, we have given the weighted parentalscores for any relevant criteria included on your questionnaire.
In terms of parental perceptions Gold represents outstanding, green is good, black requires improvement andred is inadequate.
Score Sample
1. My child is happy at this school
Happiness of child 78.4% 553
2. My child feels safe at this school
Control of bullying 81.7% 436
School security 73.0% 513
3. My child makes good progress at this school
Developing potential 80.4% 538
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress 78.1% 528
4. My child is well looked after at this school
Caring teachers 80.8% 546
Looking after pupils well 77.8% 520
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff 77.6% 323
School security 73.0% 513
5. My child is taught well at this school
Developing potential 80.4% 538
Teaching quality 79.3% 542
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress 78.1% 528
Exam results 77.7% 442
Teaching pupils with special needs 71.7% 103
6. My child receives appropriate homework for their age
Respondents saying 'Right' for homework amount Good 616
Levels of homework 76.8% 552
Parent survey report – Parent View summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 32 of 91
Score Sample
7. This school ensures the pupils are well behaved
School discipline 83.9% 551
8. This school deals effectively with bullying
Control of bullying 81.7% 436
9. Quality of school management
The school did not ask any questions relevant to this section
10. This school responds well to any concern I raise
Caring teachers 80.8% 546
Access to staff 80.5% 524
11. I receive valuable information from the school about my child's progress
Written reports 76.2% 500
Regular marking of work 75.6% 479
12. I would recommend this school to another parent
Recommended 97.2% 552
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 33 of 91
Ofsted self-evaluation summaryThe September 2019 Ofsted Common Inspection Framework asserts the increased importance of a school’sown self-evaluation data as the starting point of the inspection process.
The following summary is presented as a predictor of school inspection outcomes. The self-evaluation evidenceis presented under the four main judgements: ‘The Quality of Education’, ‘Personal Development, Behaviourand Attitudes’, ‘Personal Development’ and ‘Leadership and Management’. The effectiveness of Early Yearsand Sixth Form provision, where relevant, and the school’s promotion of ‘Spiritual, Moral, Social and CulturalDevelopment’ (SMSC) are also included.
All of these judgements feed in to the school’s Overall Effectiveness.
The evidence given here is only that achieved from this survey; it is vital that your evidence summary forOfsted also considers any other evidence that you have gathered, either from other surveys or from internalmeasurement and observation.
The Judgement areas, plus an overall summary, are broken down into sub-criteria. Scores of 1 to 4 representratings of Outstanding, Good, Requires improvement, and Inadequate, as used by Ofsted. Where any area isfound to be Inadequate then this rating will be given for the section as a whole. Criteria where evidence wasindicative rather than reliable are once again given in pink.
Remember, for grading comparisons with our colour coded system:
Gold = Outstanding = Grade 1
Green = Good = Grade 2
Black = Requires improvement = Grade 3
Red = Inadequate = Grade 4
If your grade is close to the boundary above, this is indicated with a + (plus). If your grade is close to theboundary below, this is indicated with a - (minus).
We show the strengths and weaknesses in each sub-section, where appropriate; where there are fewer thanfour criteria, these are not shown. Red criteria cannot be shown as strengths; gold criteria cannot be shown asweaknesses.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 34 of 91
The Quality of Education
IntentAppropriate level of challenge in homework 76.2% Outstanding
Choice of subjects 75.5% Outstanding
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 75.2% Outstanding
P.S.H.E 79.4% Good
Teaching pupils with special needs 71.7% Good
Strengths
• Appropriate level of challenge in homework
Weaknesses
• Teaching pupils with special needs
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.4 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
ImplementationCaring teachers 80.8% Outstanding
Developing potential 80.4% Outstanding
Teaching quality 79.3% Outstanding
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress 78.1% Outstanding
Appropriate level of challenge in homework 76.2% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 75.6% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
Quality of feedback on pupil's work 74.8% Good
Strengths
• Caring teachers
• Developing potential
• Teaching quality
Weaknesses
• Quality of feedback on pupil's work
• Average of academic subject ratings
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 35 of 91
ImpactProgress against the national academic criteria Outstanding
University Expectations 93.2% Outstanding
Careers advice 83.8% Outstanding
Chemistry 82.8% Outstanding
Mathematics 82.1% Outstanding
STEM 81.9% Outstanding
Physics 80.5% Outstanding
Teaching quality 79.3% Outstanding
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress 78.1% Outstanding
Exam results 77.7% Outstanding
Choice of subjects 75.5% Outstanding
P.S.H.E 79.4% Good
ICT 78.8% Good
English 78.6% Good
Biology 75.7% Good
Co-ordinated Science 75.2% Good
Teaching pupils with special needs 71.7% Good
Computer Science 68.7% Requires improvement
Computer access 63.9% Requires improvement
Strengths
• Progress against the national academic criteria
• University Expectations
• Careers advice
Weaknesses
• Computer access
• Computer Science
• Teaching pupils with special needs
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.5 = Good = Grade 2 ( + )
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: The Quality of EducationNot applicable.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 36 of 91
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: The Quality of EducationUniversity Expectations 93.2% Outstanding
Caring teachers 85.7% Outstanding
Chemistry 84.7% Outstanding
Mathematics 84.5% Outstanding
Regular marking of work 81.4% Outstanding
Teaching quality 80.8% Outstanding
Developing potential 80.6% Outstanding
Physics 80.3% Outstanding
Careers advice 80.2% Outstanding
Appropriate level of challenge in homework 79.9% Outstanding
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress 79.2% Outstanding
Exam results 78.6% Outstanding
Quality of feedback on pupil's work 77.3% Outstanding
Choice of subjects 76.9% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
Progress against the national academic criteria Good
Biology 76.3% Good
English 75.1% Good
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 74.2% Good
Teaching pupils with special needs 66.1% Good
Computer Science 69.6% Requires improvement
Computer access 60.3% Requires improvement
Strengths
• University Expectations
• Caring teachers
• Chemistry
Weaknesses
• Computer access
• Computer Science
• Teaching pupils with special needs
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Summary grade – The Quality of Education section
Your average parental grade for "The Quality of Education" = 1.4 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 37 of 91
Behaviour and Attitudes
Behaviour and AttitudesSchool discipline 83.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 82.6% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.7% Outstanding
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 80.7% Outstanding
Truancy control 76.3% Outstanding
Pupils' attitudes to learning 75.3% Outstanding
E-safety 72.2% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• E-safety
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.1 = Outstanding = Grade 1
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: Behaviour and AttitudesNot applicable.
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Behaviour and AttitudesSchool discipline 85.8% Outstanding
Community spirit 81.7% Outstanding
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 81.6% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.1% Outstanding
Truancy control 77.4% Outstanding
Pupils' attitudes to learning 76.3% Outstanding
E-safety 71.8% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• E-safety
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.1 = Outstanding = Grade 1
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 38 of 91
Summary grade – Behaviour and Attitudes section
Your average parental grade for "Behaviour and Attitudes" = 1.1 = Outstanding = Grade 1
In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 39 of 91
Personal Development
Personal DevelopmentCareers advice 83.8% Outstanding
Healthy Lifestyle - Exercise 82.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 82.6% Outstanding
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 80.7% Outstanding
Social health education 77.2% Outstanding
P.S.H.E 79.4% Good
Promoting racial harmony 74.3% Good
Healthy Lifestyle - Diet 51.3% Requires improvement
Strengths
• Careers advice
• Healthy Lifestyle - Exercise
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• Healthy Lifestyle - Diet
• Promoting racial harmony
• P.S.H.E
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 40 of 91
SMSCDeveloping moral values 84.3% Outstanding
Community spirit 82.6% Outstanding
Religious Studies 82.6% Outstanding
Caring teachers 80.8% Outstanding
Looking after pupils well 77.8% Outstanding
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff 77.6% Outstanding
Social health education 77.2% Outstanding
P.S.H.E 79.4% Good
English 78.6% Good
Art 77.4% Good
Music 76.5% Good
Promoting racial harmony 74.3% Good
Games 73.4% Good
Strengths
• Developing moral values
• Community spirit
• Religious Studies
Weaknesses
• Games
• Promoting racial harmony
• Music
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Effectiveness of the Early Years: Personal DevelopmentNot applicable.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 41 of 91
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Personal DevelopmentCaring teachers 85.7% Outstanding
Developing moral values 84.8% Outstanding
Healthy Lifestyle - Exercise 82.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 81.7% Outstanding
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 81.6% Outstanding
Social health education 80.4% Outstanding
Careers advice 80.2% Outstanding
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff 79.4% Outstanding
Looking after pupils well 78.5% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 75.5% Outstanding
English 75.1% Good
Games 73.4% Good
Healthy Lifestyle - Diet 51.3% Requires improvement
Strengths
• Caring teachers
• Developing moral values
• Healthy Lifestyle - Exercise
Weaknesses
• Healthy Lifestyle - Diet
• Games
• English
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Summary grade – Personal Development section
Your average parental grade for "Personal Development" = 1.4 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 42 of 91
Leadership and Management
Leadership and ManagementTeaching quality 79.3% Outstanding
Exam results 77.7% Outstanding
Pupils' attitudes to learning 75.3% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
Strengths
• Teaching quality
Weaknesses
• Average of academic subject ratings
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1
GovernanceTeaching quality 79.3% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.5 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 43 of 91
SafeguardingDeveloping moral values 84.3% Outstanding
School discipline 83.9% Outstanding
Community spirit 82.6% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.7% Outstanding
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 80.7% Outstanding
Looking after pupils well 77.8% Outstanding
Social health education 77.2% Outstanding
Truancy control 76.3% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 74.3% Good
School security 73.0% Good
E-safety 72.2% Good
Strengths
• Developing moral values
• School discipline
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• E-safety
• School security
• Promoting racial harmony
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
Effectiveness of the Early Years Provision: Leadership and ManagementNot applicable.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 44 of 91
Effectiveness of the Sixth Form Provision: Leadership and ManagementSchool discipline 85.8% Outstanding
Developing moral values 84.8% Outstanding
Community spirit 81.7% Outstanding
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 81.6% Outstanding
Control of bullying 81.1% Outstanding
Teaching quality 80.8% Outstanding
Social health education 80.4% Outstanding
Exam results 78.6% Outstanding
Looking after pupils well 78.5% Outstanding
Truancy control 77.4% Outstanding
Pupils' attitudes to learning 76.3% Outstanding
Promoting racial harmony 75.5% Outstanding
Average of academic subject ratings Good
School security 74.4% Good
E-safety 71.8% Good
Strengths
• School discipline
• Developing moral values
• Community spirit
Weaknesses
• E-safety
• School security
• Average of academic subject ratings
Your average parental grade for this section = 1.2 = Outstanding = Grade 1
Summary grade – Leadership and Management section
Your average parental grade for "Leadership and Management" = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
In order to continue to be Outstanding, the school needs to maintain or improve all criteria.
Parent survey report – Self-evaluation summary
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 45 of 91
Overall effectiveness
SummaryThe Quality of Education 1.4 Outstanding Grade 1 ( - )
Behaviour and Attitudes 1.1 Outstanding Grade 1
Personal Development 1.4 Outstanding Grade 1 ( - )
Leadership and Management 1.3 Outstanding Grade 1 ( - )
Summary grade – Overall effectiveness
Your average parental grade for "Overall effectiveness" = 1.3 = Outstanding = Grade 1 ( - )
To reach the next grade
In order to reach the next grade (Outstanding), the school needs to improve anything with a score below thenext grade border, and maintain or improve other criteria.
Parent survey report – Unexpected results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 46 of 91
Unexpected results
Analysis to investigate unexpected or unusual year group results
This section of the report identifies results that were particularly unexpected or unusual that may be of interestto you.
Our research shows us that typically, average scores of many criteria do change as students get older; somescores improve whilst others decline, or show a dip or a spike in a particular year group. There are manyreasons for why these differences occur; for example because a subject is dropped in year 9 or because someissues become more or less important as students progress through the school.
We are able to apply these national patterns to the scores from your school, and as a result, make a predictionof the scores we would have expected from each year group. This allows us to look at the differencesbetween your year group scores in light of what usually happens in similar schools which enables us to moremeaningfully compare the satisfaction of parents from one year group against those from another.
We have plotted your actual score for each year group against the score that we would have expected eachyear group to contribute, and the following pages identify those criteria where results were unexpected orunusual.
The first graph on each page shows the satisfaction scores for each year group. The line shows the score thatwe would have expected.
The second graph breaks this information down further by showing you how the parents from each year groupscored, from ‘very poor’ through to ‘very good’.
Parent survey report – Unexpected results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 47 of 91
Unexpected results for ‘German’
• The contribution towards the score for German was lower than expected for 6th Form.
Actual versus expected scores for German
This survey Expected
83%80%
70%
74%
64%
59%
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
Breakdown of parent responses for German
Very poor Poor Neither Good Very good
1% 1%
6%
2% 2%
14%
1%
4%
7%
12%
23%
11%12%14% 14%
8%
16%
20%
39%
35%
46% 45%
34%
31%
47% 46%
27%
34%
25%23%
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Unexpected results
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 48 of 91
Unexpected results for ‘Computer Science’
• The contribution towards the score for Computer Science was lower than expected for Year 11.
Actual versus expected scores for Computer Science
This survey Expected
74%
52%
65%
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Breakdown of parent responses for Computer Science
Very poor Poor Neither Good Very good
0%
14% 13%
0%
18%
13%
20% 21%
7%
64%
39%
33%
16%
7%
33%
Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 49 of 91
Standard analysisThis section of the reports summarises parents’ views on the school’s performance.
Performance and expectations
Performance compared to last year
6%
18%
49%
2%0%
25%
Much improved Slightlyimproved
Remained thesame
Slightly worse Much worse I don't know0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Per
cent
age
• Of the parents whose children were not in their first year at the school 24% said the school had improvedover the last year and 2% thought that the school’s performance was worse.
Has the school lived up to your expectations
33%
41%
4%
23%
Better than I expected About what I expected Worse than I expected I don't know0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
• Of the parents of new students, 4% felt that the school had not lived up to their expectations and 33% saidthe school was better than they had expected it to be.
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 50 of 91
Extra analysis
This section of the report provides an analysis of parent scores broken down by the response to the question‘Has your child ever been eligible for free school meals during the last six years?’.
Satisfaction scores for non-academic criteria
Yes No
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Caring
teac
hers
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Develo
ping
mor
al va
lues
Exam
resu
lts
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Schoo
l sec
urity
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Schoo
l facil
ities
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Availa
bility
of r
esou
rces
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
• There are no significant differences between the non-academic satisfaction scores for parents broken downby the question ‘Has your child ever been eligible for free school meals during the last six years?’.
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 51 of 91
Satisfaction scores for additional criteria
Yes No
83% 83% 83%
78%
75% 75% 75%
82%
86%
79% 78%
74%
79%
70%
Look
ing a
fter p
upils
well
Mak
ing su
re th
at n
ew p
upils
settle
in w
ell
Pupils
' attit
udes
to le
arnin
g
Acces
s to
staff
Appro
priat
e lev
el of
chall
enge
in
hom
ewor
k
Ensur
ing p
upils
do
their
best/
mak
e go
od p
rogr
ess
Quality
of f
eedb
ack o
n pu
pil's
work
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
erce
ntag
e
• There are no significant differences between the additional satisfaction scores for parents broken down bythe question ‘Has your child ever been eligible for free school meals during the last six years?’.
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 52 of 91
Extra analysis
This section of the report provides an analysis of parent scores broken down by the response to the question‘Does the school fully develop pupils' potential?’.
Satisfaction scores for academic criteria
Yes No
Mat
hem
atics
Histor
y
Englis
h
STEM
Chem
istry
Religio
us S
tudie
s
Dram
a
Frenc
h
Physic
s
Geogr
aphy Art
Econo
mics
P. E.
Biolog
y
Design
Tec
hnolo
gy
Co-or
dinat
ed S
cienc
e
Classic
sIC
T
Games
Germ
an
Mus
ic
P.S.H
.E
Compu
ter S
cienc
e0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Per
cent
age
Academic criteria wheredifference is significant
Yes satisfaction score (%) No satisfaction score (%)
Mathematics 87.4 75.3
History 87.3 75.0
English 85.7 67.6
STEM 84.5 67.0
Chemistry 83.8 76.4
Religious Studies 82.7 67.2
Drama 82.0 70.4
French 81.8 67.1
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 53 of 91
Academic criteria wheredifference is significant
Yes satisfaction score (%) No satisfaction score (%)
Physics 81.6 72.1
Geography 81.5 69.4
Art 81.4 63.7
P. E. 80.2 65.3
Biology 78.4 66.1
Design Technology 78.4 65.7
Co-ordinated Science 78.1 65.2
Classics 78.0 60.2
ICT 77.3 60.1
Games 77.1 55.0
German 76.9 64.3
Music 76.1 65.4
P.S.H.E 75.8 62.3
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 54 of 91
Satisfaction scores for non-academic criteria
Yes No
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Caring
teac
hers
Develo
ping
mor
al va
lues
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Teach
ing q
uality
Exam
resu
lts
Comm
unity
spirit
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Schoo
l sec
urity
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Caree
rs a
dvice
Schoo
l facil
ities
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Availa
bility
of r
esou
rces
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
erce
ntag
e
Non-academic criteria wheredifference is significant
Yes satisfaction score (%) No satisfaction score (%)
School discipline 90.3 73.2
Caring teachers 87.3 67.9
Developing moral values 87.2 68.2
Happiness of child 87.1 66.6
Developing confidence 86.3 61.1
Developing potential 86.1 53.9
Truancy control 85.9 75.3
Teaching quality 85.2 66.4
Exam results 84.7 69.8
Community spirit 83.0 63.0
Control of bullying 82.9 62.6
School communication 82.5 58.0
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 55 of 91
Non-academic criteria wheredifference is significant
Yes satisfaction score (%) No satisfaction score (%)
Choice of subjects 82.4 67.3
School security 80.8 61.8
Social health education 79.4 59.0
Careers advice 77.7 54.0
School facilities 76.5 60.9
Levels of homework 75.6 56.5
Computer access 72.1 54.7
Availability of resources 66.3 44.5
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 56 of 91
Satisfaction scores for additional criteria
Yes No
Mak
ing su
re th
at n
ew
pupil
s set
tle in
well
Look
ing a
fter p
upils
well
Ensur
ing p
upils
do
their
best/
mak
e go
od p
rogr
ess
Attitud
e of
non
-teac
hing/
supp
ortsta
ff
Pupils
' attit
udes
to le
arnin
g
Encou
ragin
g an
d lis
tenin
g to
pupil
s' vie
ws
Prom
oting
racia
l har
mon
y
Acces
s to
staff
Celebr
ating
and
rewar
ding
achie
vem
ent
Treat
ing a
ll pup
ils fa
irly/e
quall
y
Out o
f sch
ool a
ctivit
ies a
nd cl
ubs
E-saf
ety
Writ
ten
repo
rts
Appro
priat
e lev
el of
chall
enge
in
hom
ewor
k
Teach
ing p
upils
with
spec
ial n
eeds
Quality
of S
pecia
list r
oom
s e.g
.La
bs
Quality
of f
eedb
ack o
n pu
pil's
work
Regula
r mar
king
of w
ork
Unexp
ecte
d co
sts o
r exp
ense
s0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%P
erce
ntag
e
Additional criteria wheredifference is significant
Yes satisfaction score (%) No satisfaction score (%)
Making sure that new pupils settle in well 89.4 73.2
Looking after pupils well 86.3 67.2
Ensuring pupils do their best/make goodprogress
84.8 54.7
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff 84.7 71.3
Pupils' attitudes to learning 83.1 62.8
Encouraging and listening to pupils' views 82.4 59.8
Promoting racial harmony 82.0 64.1
Access to staff 82.0 65.2
Celebrating and rewarding achievement 81.8 58.6
Treating all pupils fairly/equally 81.7 60.9
Out of school activities and clubs 81.4 67.5
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 57 of 91
Additional criteria wheredifference is significant
Yes satisfaction score (%) No satisfaction score (%)
E-safety 80.6 66.7
Written reports 80.0 67.4
Appropriate level of challenge in homework 78.2 57.0
Teaching pupils with special needs 78.1 56.7
Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs 76.4 63.6
Quality of feedback on pupil's work 75.3 49.5
Regular marking of work 74.0 52.3
Unexpected costs or expenses 70.8 55.8
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 58 of 91
Academic stretch
This section of the report summarises parents’ perceptions of whether their children are pushed too hard or nothard enough.
Scores should ideally not exceed the red line. We find that English and Mathematics, however, do commonlycross the red line for 'not pushed hard enough'.
Parents’ views on whether their children are being pushed too hard or not hard enough broken down by subject:
Not pushed hard enough Pushed too hard
Compu
ter S
cienc
eEPQ
Mat
hem
atics
Germ
an
Frenc
h
Englis
h
Busine
ss S
tudie
s
Geogr
aphy
Biolog
y
Econo
mics
Co-or
dinat
ed S
cienc
e
Physic
s
Mus
icIC
TP. E
.
Chem
istry
Dram
a
Histor
y
Philos
ophy
& E
thics
STEM
Design
Tec
hnolo
gy
Classic
s Art
Religio
us S
tudie
s
Games
P.S.H
.E
Gover
nmen
t & P
olitic
s
Theat
re S
tudie
s0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Per
cent
age
Not pushedhard enough
Pushed too hardAcademic stretch percentages
Yes No Yes No
This survey 39.2 60.8 17.9 82.1
Similar schools 41.1 58.9 14.5 85.5
Yes 36.4 63.6 36.4 63.6Extra analysis broken down by the response tothe question ‘Has your child ever been eligible forfree school meals during the last six years?’ No 41.5 58.5 17.7 82.3
Yes 37.7 62.3 17.4 82.6Extra analysis broken down by the response tothe question ‘Does the school fully develop pupils'potential?’ No 59.3 40.7 24.8 75.2
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 59 of 91
Healthy lifestyle
This section of the report summarises parents’ perceptions of whether their children are encouraged to livehealthy lifestyles.
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘Eating a healthy diet?’
This survey Similar schools
51%49%
57%
43%
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘School encourages healthy lifestyle through exercise’
This survey Similar schools
83%
17%
71%
29%
Yes No0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 60 of 91
Parental values
This section of the report summarises parental values and expectations.
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘Do you expect that your child will one day attend University?’
This survey Similar schools
56%
37%
0% 0%2%
37% 38%
9%
2%
10%
Yes, definitely Yes, probably No, probably not No, definitely not I don't know0%
20%
40%
60%
Per
cent
age
• 56.2% of parents think their child will definitely attend university – this differs from the views of parents atsimilar schools. 37.0% of parents think their child will probably attend university – this is broadly in line withviews from parents at similar schools.
• 0.0% of parents think their child will probably not attend university – this differs from the views of parents atsimilar schools. 0.2% of parents think their child will definitely not attend university – this is broadly in linewith views from parents at similar schools.
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘How important is it that your child goes to University?’
This survey Similar schools
43% 43%
8%
1%
32%
38%
19%
5%
Very important Quite important Not very important Of no importance0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
• 43.3% of parents think it is very important that their child goes to university – this differs from the views ofparents at similar schools. 42.5% of parents think it is quite important that their child goes to university –this is broadly in line with views from parents at similar schools.
• 8.4% of parents think it is not very important that their child goes to university – this differs from the views ofparents at similar schools. 1.3% of parents think it is not at all important that their child goes to university –this is broadly in line with views from parents at similar schools.
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 61 of 91
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘If you considered sending your child to another school please say whichone.’
64%
15% 14%
4% 3%
Judd Tunbridge WellsSchool
Other Bennett Sevenoaks0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Per
cent
age
Parents’ responses to the question: ‘Why did you decide to send your child to The Skinners' School?’
40%
18%
10% 9% 9%
6%4% 3%
1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Reput
ation
/
Recom
men
ded
Acade
mic
Reaso
ns
Loca
tion
Choice
of C
hild
Visit/O
pen
Day
Suited
Chil
d's
Needs
Family
Atte
nded
Non-A
cade
mic
Reaso
ns
First C
hoice
Said No
Stay w
ith F
riend
s
Catch
men
t
Facilit
ies
Other
Religio
us
Reaso
n/Uniq
ue
Reaso
n0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Per
cent
age
Some parents chose more than one option.
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 62 of 91
Homework
This section of the report provides a summary of time spent on homework broken down by year group.Comparable data is provided from the last survey and from similar schools.
For this question, schools typically achieve more than 50% of parents who choose “about right”.
Parent perceptions of the amount of homework given
Not enough Too variable Too much About right
16%
1%
12%
32%
29%
21%
11%12%14%
11%
15% 14% 13%
8%9%
21%
5%3% 3%
9%11%
62% 63%
72%
49%
54%
57%
71%
All parents Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 6th Form0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Per
cent
age
Hours of homework Hours
This survey 7.4 hrs
Similar schools 6.8 hrs
Yes 7.3 hrsExtra analysis broken down by the response to the question ‘Hasyour child ever been eligible for free school meals during the last sixyears?’ No 7.4 hrs
Yes 7.5 hrsExtra analysis broken down by the response to the question ‘Doesthe school fully develop pupils' potential?’ No 6.7 hrs
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 63 of 91
Homework hours for All parents
Mean hours spent on homework weekly All parents – distribution of hours (Sample: 628)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
7.4 hrs 7.4 hrs 6.8 hrs
0%2%
20%
25%
15%
9% 10%
6% 6%
1% 1%
5%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Per
cent
age
Homework hours for Year 7
Mean hours spent on homework weekly Year 7 – distribution of hours (Sample: 105)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
6.7 hrs 5.3 hrs 4.9 hrs
0%2%
19%
23%22%
14%
9%8%
4%
1%0% 0%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Per
cent
age
Homework hours for Year 8
Mean hours spent on homework weekly Year 8 – distribution of hours (Sample: 101)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
5.0 hrs 5.9 hrs 5.1 hrs
0%3%
29%
39%
13%
8%
2%4%
1% 0% 0% 0%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 64 of 91
Homework hours for Year 9
Mean hours spent on homework weekly Year 9 – distribution of hours (Sample: 99)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
5.3 hrs 5.6 hrs 5.4 hrs
0%
3%
31% 31%
14%
9%
6%4%
0% 0% 1% 1%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Per
cent
age
Homework hours for Year 10
Mean hours spent on homework weekly Year 10 – distribution of hours (Sample: 81)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
5.4 hrs 7.7 hrs 6.7 hrs
0%
5%
25%
32%
16%
12%
5%3%
1% 0% 1% 0%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Per
cent
age
Homework hours for Year 11
Mean hours spent on homework weekly Year 11 – distribution of hours (Sample: 88)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
8.4 hrs 7.9 hrs 7.9 hrs
0% 0%
12%
23%
20%
7%
22%
2%
5%
0%1%
7%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Standard analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 65 of 91
Homework hours for 6th Form
Mean hours spent on homework weekly 6th Form – distribution of hours (Sample: 79)
Thissurvey
Previoussurvey
Similarschools
Allstudents
11.5 hrs 10.2 hrs 11.1 hrs
1% 1%
6%
10%
7%
10%
18%
11%
15%
3%4%
14%
00-
22-
44-
66-
88-
1010
-12
12-1
414
-16
16-1
818
-20
20+
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Per
cent
age
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 66 of 91
Year group analysis
Analysis of year group scores compared to national average
The graphs in this section of the report show the scores achieved for each of the surveyed criteria, brokendown by year group, compared to the national averages. The purple line shows the scores achieved from theaverage of similar schools, where these averages are available. If the bar is above the line, students in thatyear group are more satisfied than the national average. If the bar is below the line, students in that year groupare less satisfied than the national average. Any unusual results are explained in more detail in the unexpectedresults section of this report (see page 46).
Criteria where evidence was indicative rather than reliable are once again shown in pink.
Year groups where there were fewer than 15 respondents for a criterion are not shown. Note that the yeargroup scores are un-weighted.
Year group analysis compared to national averages for academic criteria
English
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mathematics
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Co-ordinated Science
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Biology
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 67 of 91
Chemistry
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Physics
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
P. E.
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
French
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Drama
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Music
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Geography
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
History
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 68 of 91
P.S.H.E
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
ICT
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Art
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Design Technology
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Religious Studies
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
German
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Games
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Classics
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 69 of 91
Economics
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
STEM
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Computer Science
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Government & Politics
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Year group analysis compared to national averages for non-academiccriteria
School discipline
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
School facilities
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Developing confidence
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Social health education
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 70 of 91
Control of bullying
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Caring teachers
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
School security
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
School communication
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Careers advice
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Developing moral values
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Levels of homework
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Happiness of child
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 71 of 91
Community spirit
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Developing potential
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Teaching quality
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Exam results
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Choice of subjects
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Truancy control
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Availability of resources
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Computer access
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 72 of 91
Year group analysis compared to national averages for your additionalsurveyed criteria
Quality of Specialist rooms e.g. Labs
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Promoting racial harmony
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Unexpected costs or expenses
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Access to staff
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Teaching pupils with special needs
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Regular marking of work
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Attitude of non-teaching/support staff
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Written reports
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 73 of 91
Treating all pupils fairly/equally
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Celebrating and rewarding achievement
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Making sure that new pupils settle in well
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Encouraging and listening to pupils' views
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Looking after pupils well
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Quality of feedback on pupil's work
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Appropriate level of challenge in homework
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Year group analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 74 of 91
Pupils' attitudes to learning
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
E-safety
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Out of school activities and clubs
Year7
Year8
Year9
Year10
Year11
6thForm
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 75 of 91
Time series analysis
Graphs showing trends for surveyed criteria over time
The graphs in this section of the report show the trends for surveyed criteria, broken down over time.
Note that these results are un-weighted and year names refer to the end of the academic year. Statisticallysignificant increases in scores over time are shown in green. Statistically significant decreases in scores overtime are shown in red.
Example time series graphs
History
2018 2019 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Science
2018 2019 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Extra curricular activities
2018 2019 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Careers advice
2018 2019 202040%
60%
80%
100%
The score for Historyhas significantlyincreased over the lastthree surveys.
The score for Sciencehas significantlydecreased since thelast survey.
The score for Extracurricular activities hassignificantly increasedsince the last survey.
There has been nostatistical differencein scores for Careersadvice over the lastthree surveys.
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 76 of 91
Score trends over time for academic criteria
English
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Mathematics
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Co-ordinated Science
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Biology
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Chemistry
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Physics
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
French
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Drama
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 77 of 91
Music
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Geography
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
History
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
P.S.H.E
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
ICT
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Art
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Design Technology
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Religious Studies
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 78 of 91
German
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Games
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
STEM
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Computer Science
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Theatre Studies
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Score trends over time for non-academic criteria
School discipline
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
School facilities
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 79 of 91
Developing confidence
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Social health education
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Control of bullying
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Caring teachers
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
School security
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
School communication
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Careers advice
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Developing moral values
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 80 of 91
Levels of homework
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Happiness of child
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Community spirit
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Developing potential
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Teaching quality
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Exam results
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Choice of subjects
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Truancy control
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Time series analysis
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 81 of 91
Availability of resources
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Computer access
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Score trends over time for additional criteria
Regular marking of work
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Written reports
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Ensuring pupils do their best/make good progress
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Making sure that new pupils settle in well
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Encouraging and listening to pupils' views
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Out of school activities and clubs
2005 2007 2009 2012 202040%
60%
80%
100%
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 82 of 91
AppendixSupplementary data and score breakdowns.
Academic criteria analysis
A breakdown of how parents scored the satisfaction of academic subjects.
Academiccriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
GraphSample
size
English 0.5% 3.1% 8.4% 47.7% 40.4%1 2 3 4 5
528
Mathematics 0.5% 3.0% 6.4% 40.0% 50.1%1 2 3 4 5
532
Co-ordinatedScience
3.6% 7.2% 10.4% 44.6% 34.2%1 2 3 4 5
193
Biology 1.4% 4.2% 15.3% 48.7% 30.4%1 2 3 4 5
320
Chemistry 0.8% 3.8% 8.8% 43.2% 43.5%1 2 3 4 5
322
Physics 1.0% 5.7% 11.5% 42.8% 39.1%1 2 3 4 5
326
P. E. 0.7% 2.2% 17.1% 47.9% 32.1%1 2 3 4 5
446
French 0.8% 2.1% 13.8% 47.2% 36.1%1 2 3 4 5
429
Drama 0.0% 0.8% 16.5% 46.1% 36.7%1 2 3 4 5
346
Music 0.3% 3.2% 22.5% 46.6% 27.4%1 2 3 4 5
333
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 83 of 91
Academiccriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
GraphSample
size
Geography 0.5% 3.0% 9.6% 51.0% 36.0%1 2 3 4 5
456
History 0.2% 0.6% 6.8% 43.4% 49.0%1 2 3 4 5
463
P.S.H.E 0.8% 1.5% 24.6% 49.8% 23.3%1 2 3 4 5
347
ICT 0.8% 3.8% 18.9% 53.6% 23.0%1 2 3 4 5
265
Art 0.8% 1.8% 14.9% 46.3% 36.3%1 2 3 4 5
360
DesignTechnology
0.2% 2.6% 13.9% 57.8% 25.6%1 2 3 4 5
301
ReligiousStudies
1.3% 1.7% 10.1% 49.5% 37.3%1 2 3 4 5
444
German 3.3% 7.5% 13.1% 39.6% 36.6%1 2 3 4 5
457
Games 0.0% 1.7% 28.8% 42.4% 27.1%1 2 3 4 5
59
Classics 2.1% 3.6% 15.6% 49.2% 29.5%1 2 3 4 5
202
BusinessStudies
0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 51.5% 42.4%1 2 3 4 5
33
Economics 1.3% 3.2% 16.1% 43.7% 35.6%1 2 3 4 5
117
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 84 of 91
Academiccriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
GraphSample
size
STEM 0.0% 1.4% 9.9% 50.8% 37.9%1 2 3 4 5
284
ComputerScience
9.1% 10.5% 17.1% 46.3% 17.0%1 2 3 4 5
68
Government &Politics
0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 19.2% 76.9%1 2 3 4 5
26
Philosophy &Ethics
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 77.8%1 2 3 4 5
27
EPQ 0.0% 3.3% 50.0% 36.7% 10.0%1 2 3 4 5
30
Theatre Studies 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 81.8%1 2 3 4 5
11
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 85 of 91
Non-academic criteria analysis
How parents scored the delivery and management of non-academic criteria.
Non-academiccriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
No opinion(N)
Graph
School discipline 0.2% 1.1% 5.5% 39.1% 53.7% 0.5%1 2 3 4 5 N
School facilities 0.3% 2.9% 15.6% 64.1% 16.4% 0.6%1 2 3 4 5 N
Developingconfidence
0.5% 3.0% 10.2% 44.0% 41.1% 1.1%1 2 3 4 5 N
Social healtheducation
0.5% 1.9% 13.7% 44.3% 19.0% 20.7%1 2 3 4 5 N
Control ofbullying
1.0% 3.0% 7.1% 43.5% 24.8% 20.7%1 2 3 4 5 N
Caring teachers 0.3% 2.2% 7.0% 46.8% 42.5% 1.1%1 2 3 4 5 N
School security 0.3% 3.2% 13.4% 51.1% 25.0% 7.0%1 2 3 4 5 N
Schoolcommunication
2.7% 5.4% 10.6% 43.7% 37.5% 0.2%1 2 3 4 5 N
Careers advice 1.1% 3.4% 11.8% 27.8% 14.9% 40.9%1 2 3 4 5 N
Developingmoral values
0.2% 1.4% 9.6% 44.3% 39.6% 4.8%1 2 3 4 5 N
Levels ofhomework
2.1% 6.0% 16.5% 59.6% 15.7% 0.2%1 2 3 4 5 N
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 86 of 91
Non-academiccriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
No opinion(N)
Graph
Happiness ofchild
0.2% 3.1% 8.7% 45.8% 42.2% 0.0%1 2 3 4 5 N
Community spirit 0.2% 3.3% 14.0% 45.0% 33.5% 4.0%1 2 3 4 5 N
Developingpotential
0.3% 3.0% 13.4% 46.1% 34.6% 2.6%1 2 3 4 5 N
Teaching quality 0.2% 0.9% 8.5% 55.4% 33.2% 1.8%1 2 3 4 5 N
Exam results 0.2% 0.5% 7.1% 45.3% 28.9% 18.1%1 2 3 4 5 N
Choice ofsubjects
0.3% 2.4% 9.0% 53.3% 30.5% 4.5%1 2 3 4 5 N
Truancy control 0.2% 0.3% 3.2% 33.6% 27.5% 35.2%1 2 3 4 5 N
Availability ofresources
3.2% 13.8% 28.8% 39.0% 10.0% 5.3%1 2 3 4 5 N
Computeraccess
1.3% 4.7% 20.0% 38.0% 12.3% 23.7%1 2 3 4 5 N
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 87 of 91
Additional criteria analysis
How parents scored the delivery and management of your additional non-academic criteria.
Additionalcriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
No opinion(N)
Graph
Quality ofSpecialist roomse.g. Labs
0.0% 0.9% 10.6% 46.0% 8.7% 33.8%1 2 3 4 5 N
Promoting racialharmony
0.5% 0.8% 6.9% 33.7% 17.6% 40.6%1 2 3 4 5 N
Unexpectedcosts orexpenses
1.1% 4.1% 28.0% 39.1% 12.6% 15.0%1 2 3 4 5 N
Access to staff 0.2% 3.8% 12.1% 50.8% 28.4% 4.8%1 2 3 4 5 N
Teaching pupilswith specialneeds
0.6% 1.9% 4.6% 7.4% 6.4% 79.2%1 2 3 4 5 N
Regular markingof work
1.1% 7.6% 16.9% 45.7% 15.0% 13.7%1 2 3 4 5 N
Attitude of non-teaching/supportstaff
0.0% 0.5% 3.9% 32.6% 21.5% 41.5%1 2 3 4 5 N
Written reports 0.5% 2.7% 13.1% 49.5% 24.9% 9.4%1 2 3 4 5 N
Treating allpupils fairly/equally
0.8% 2.5% 9.0% 41.8% 22.7% 23.2%1 2 3 4 5 N
Celebratingand rewardingachievement
1.1% 3.8% 12.5% 43.8% 29.9% 8.9%1 2 3 4 5 N
Ensuring pupilsdo their best/make goodprogress
0.6% 3.8% 11.9% 48.4% 31.0% 4.3%1 2 3 4 5 N
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 88 of 91
Additionalcriteria
Verypoor (1)
Poor (2)Average
(3)Good (4)
Verygood (5)
No opinion(N)
Graph
Making sure thatnew pupils settlein well
0.0% 0.8% 4.3% 26.9% 37.5% 30.5%1 2 3 4 5 N
Encouragingand listening topupils' views
0.3% 0.6% 12.4% 40.0% 22.5% 24.1%1 2 3 4 5 N
Looking afterpupils well
0.2% 1.3% 7.7% 47.8% 36.7% 6.3%1 2 3 4 5 N
Quality offeedback onpupil's work
1.3% 7.3% 20.7% 47.3% 17.1% 6.3%1 2 3 4 5 N
Appropriate levelof challenge inhomework
1.1% 3.6% 15.6% 56.5% 19.3% 3.8%1 2 3 4 5 N
Pupils' attitudesto learning
0.3% 1.3% 11.8% 55.2% 28.0% 3.3%1 2 3 4 5 N
E-safety 0.6% 1.0% 9.8% 46.2% 21.1% 21.4%1 2 3 4 5 N
Out of schoolactivities andclubs
0.2% 4.1% 13.4% 45.1% 33.7% 3.5%1 2 3 4 5 N
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 89 of 91
Graphs to show raw, adjusted satisfaction scores achieved for each ofthe criterion surveyed, before weightings are applied.
Academic subjects (1 of 2)
4.8 4.8 4.7
4.4 4.4 4.44.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0
Theat
re S
tudie
s
Philos
ophy
& E
thics
Gover
nmen
t & P
olitic
s
Histor
y
Mat
hem
atics
Busine
ss S
tudie
s
Chem
istry
STEM
Englis
h
Dram
a
Geogr
aphy
Religio
us S
tudie
s
Physic
s Art
Frenc
h
Econo
mics
P. E.
Design
Tec
hnolo
gy
Biolog
y
Classic
s1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Mea
n
Academic subjects (2 of 2)
4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9
3.6 3.5
Co-ordinatedScience
Music Games ICT P.S.H.E German ComputerScience
EPQ1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Mea
n
Non-academic areas
4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.7
3.4
Schoo
l disc
ipline
Truan
cy co
ntro
l
Caring
teac
hers
Develo
ping
mor
al va
lues
Happin
ess o
f chil
d
Exam
resu
lts
Develo
ping
conf
idenc
e
Teach
ing q
uality
Choice
of s
ubjec
ts
Develo
ping
pote
ntial
Comm
unity
spirit
Contro
l of b
ullyin
g
Schoo
l com
mun
icatio
n
Schoo
l sec
urity
Social
hea
lth e
duca
tion
Schoo
l facil
ities
Caree
rs a
dvice
Leve
ls of
hom
ewor
k
Compu
ter a
cces
s
Availa
bility
of r
esou
rces
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Mea
n
Parent survey report – Appendix
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 90 of 91
Additional questions
4.54.3 4.3
4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.1 4.13.9 3.9
3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7
Mak
ing su
re
that
new
...
Attitud
e of
non-
teac
hing/
supp
...
Look
ing a
fter
pupil
s well
Pupils
' attit
udes
to le
arnin
g
Prom
oting
racia
l har
mon
y
Out o
f sch
ool
activ
ities a
nd...
Encou
ragin
g
and
liste
ning.
..
Ensur
ing p
upils
do th
eir...
Acces
s to
staff
E-saf
ety
Treat
ing a
ll
pupil
s...
Celebr
ating
and
rewar
ding.
..
Writ
ten
repo
rts
Quality
of
Specia
list..
.
Appro
priat
e
level
of...
Teach
ing p
upils
with sp
ecial
...
Regula
r
mar
king
of w
ork
Quality
of
feed
back
on.
..
Unexp
ecte
d
costs
or..
.1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0M
ean
Parent survey report
Copyright © 2020 Kirkland Rowell Limited Page 91 of 91
A word on Quality AssuranceTo ensure our services have maximum input, our accredited facilitators have extensive experience at seniorleadership level in schools and are all experienced in working with schools on the use of data to inform schoolimprovement and review. In addition, our ISO 27001 accreditation means your data is safe with us.
For further details please visit our website www.gl-assessment.co.uk.