pakistan conference on sanitation ( pacosan )
DESCRIPTION
Pakistan Conference on sanitation ( pacosan ). Presentation by CH. KARAMAT ALI CHIEF (WATER SUPPLY & SANITATION) PUNJAB. VISION. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
PAKISTAN CONFERENCE ON SANITATION (PACOSAN)
Presentation by CH. KARAMAT ALI
CHIEF (WATER SUPPLY & SANITATION)
PUNJAB
VISION Achievement of the Millennium Development
Goals (MDGs) within the stipulated time frame through the provision of Safe Drinking Water & Sanitation coverage to the community.
Background (Situation Analysis)
Only 58% Population (urban and rural) has access to sanitation.
The sanitary facilities are highest in major cities (98% to 92%) and substantially reduces in rural areas (42%).
20 Districts of Punjab have lesser than 58% sanitation coverage with 8 Districts fall below 40% coverage line.
Only 43% Population has proper disposal of waste water (26% in rural communities only.)
15% of Provincial population avails the facility of proper solid waste management facilities. (33%-66% in urban areas and only 1.2% in rural areas).
District Wise Existing Sanitation Situation
( Continued )
S. No
Name of District
No. of Unions Sanitation
Coverage
Solid waste Managemen
t
Diarrhea/ Water-Borne
Diseases
Low Urban Rural Total
1. Rajanpur 5 39 44 28% 1% 34
2. Muzaffargarh
11 82 93 29% 1% 41
3. D.G. Khan 8 51 59 33% 1% 52
4. Bahawalpur 29 78 107 41% 3% 21
5. R.Y. Khan 22 100 122 44% 1% 21
District Wise Existing Sanitation Situation
( Continued )
S. No`
Name of District
No. of Unions Sanitation
Coverage
Solid waste Manageme
nt
Diarrhea/ Water-Borne
Diseases
Low Urban Rural Total
6. Bahawalnagar 22 96 118 44% 1% 27
7. Lodhran 11 62 73 39% 1% 33
8 Bhakkar 6 36 42 36% 1% 17
9 Jhang 29 99 128 36% 1% 18
10 Narrowal 7 67 74 39% 1% 23
TOTAL 150 710 860 28-44% 1-3%
District Wise Existing Sanitation Situation
( Continued )
S. No
Name of District
No. of Unions Sanitation
Coverage
Solid waste Managemen
t
Diarrhea/ Water-Borne
Diseases
Medium Urban Rural Total
1. Pakpattan 9 54 63 46% 1% 17
2. Kasur 26 87 113 48% 2% 10
3. Sheikhupura 31 70 101 70% 2% 23
4. Khushab 13 38 51 48% 1% 20
5. Mianwali 9 47 56 62% 1% 22
6. Hafizabad 11 31 42 51% 1% 17
7. M.B Din 8 57 65 50% 1% 20
District Wise Existing Sanitation Situation
( Continued )
S. No
Name of District
No. of Unions Sanitation
Coverage
Solid waste Manageme
nt
Diarrhea/ Water-Borne
Diseases
Medium Urban Rural Total
8. Attock 12 60 72 60% 1% 25
9. Chakwal 8 60 68 61% 1% 11
10. Gujrat 30 87 117 63% 3% 21
TOTAL 157 591 748 48-70% 1-3%
District Wise Existing Sanitation Situation
S. No
Name of District
No. of Unions Sanitation
Coverage
Solid waste Manageme
nt
Diarrhea/ Water-Borne
Diseases
High Urban Rural Total
1. Lahore 118 32 150 93% 70% 14
2. Gujranwala 84 104 188 84% 66% 17
3. Faisalabad 126 163 289 75% 64% 18
4. Rawalpindi 56 119 175 70% 60% 17
TOTAL 384 418 802 70-93% 60-70%GRAND TOTAL
(L+M+H)
691 1719
2410
Punjab Sanitation Service Delivery
Area Washing Hands
Usage of Latrines
Drainage Solid Waste Management
Rural 45% 42% 26% 1%
Town 73% 92% 77% 33%
City 87% 98% 95% 66%
Existing Sanitation Situation
10
13
Existing Sanitation Situation
15
Existing Sanitation Situation
Outlived G.I, M.S And C.I Pipe LinesOutlived G.I, M.S And C.I Pipe Lines
House Connection Pipes Passing ThroughHouse Connection Pipes Passing Through
Manholes/Drains Manholes/Drains
House Connection Pipes Passing ThroughHouse Connection Pipes Passing Through
Manholes/Drains Manholes/Drains
Budgetary outlay for sanitation, out of Government’s annual budget (Rural Sanitation )
2600
4500
5200
6500
8000
9000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All
ocati
on
(R
s.
In M
illi
on
)
939 1165
3804
6760
10000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Years
All
ocati
on
(R
s.
In M
illi
on
)Budgetary outlay for sanitation out of Government’s annual budget (5 Big cities)
2900
54396365
10304
14760
18000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Budgetary outlay for sanitation out of Government’s annual budget (Combined)
Targets and Achievements
Indicator
Population Coverage(2006-07)
(%)
Population Coverage(2007-08)
(%)
Population Coverage(2008-09)
(%)
Population Coverage(2009-10)
(%)
Projected year of Reaching
MDG
MDG’s Targets 2015(%)
Urban water supply (Population coverage %)
66.2 71.9 75.5 83 2009-10 80.00
Rural water supply (Population coverage %)
30.8 32.7 36.1 38 2020-21 64.65
Urban Sewerage / Drainage (Population coverage %)
68.5 72.0 76.0 79 2010-11 82.10
Rural Sewerage / Drainage (Population coverage %)
41.3 43.8 48.6 50 2015-16 69.85
USD22%
UWS18%
Others17%
RSD17%
RWS26%
Targets and Achievements
Major On-going Sanitation related Initiatives
Name of the Project Cost Pop. Benefited (in
million) Kasur Environmental Improvement Project 2332 0.77
Urban Sewerage Scheme with treatment plant of Rahim Yar Khan City.
2200 0.75
Replacement of Sewerage outlived pipelines for eradication of Gastroenteritis
5000 1.63
Southern Punjab Basic Urban Services Project (SPBUSP).
7458 2.51
Comprehensive Sanitation Programme for Rural Areas of Punjab. (Sewerage / Drainage, Sewage Treatment, Ultimate Disposal, Solid Waste Management).
1000 0.33
(Rs. In Million)
Major On-going Sanitation related Initiatives
Name of the Project Cost Pop. Benefited (in
million)Urban water supply & Drainage Scheme Pakpattan and Arifwala
643 0.22
Rawalpindi Environmental Improvement Project 5142 1.72
Construction of South West Waste Water Treatment Plant, Lahore
8917 2.97
Punjab Community water supply and sanitation Project
4284 2.73
Provision of Sewerage Facilities in various Katchi Abadiies/Slums of Faisalabad City
713 0.22
(Rs. In Million)
Planned/Pipeline Projects on Sanitation
Name of the Project Cost
Comprehensive Sewerage Scheme Jhelum with treatment plant 300
Sewerage scheme Bhakkar 300
Comprehensive water supply & sewerage scheme Gujar Khan 300
Comprehensive water supply & Sewerage scheme Khushab 300
Sewerage Scheme Jhang 300
Institutional Arrangement for Sanitation Programmes
Introduction of Various Sanitation Models (Component Sharing Model LPP, Changa Pani, ISB, FSD)
Ensuring Community Participation in Project identification, execution & Monitoring.
Main focus on Rehabilitation of un-functional schemes instead of new initiatives.
Promoting waste water management and safe ultimate disposal of effluent
Conservation of Ground water resources. Focus on Capacity building, Public Awareness, education and
training.
Institutional Arrangement for Sanitation Programmes
Pakistan Environmental Protection Act -1997. Local Government Ordinance-2001. Drinking water Quality Standards. The National Sanitation Policy-2006. Minimum Quality Standards. Regulatory Framework for affective and sustained operation of
Rural Sanitation. Provincial Sanitation Strategy and Chief Minister’s Sanitation
Programme.
Monitoring and coordination mechanism with different stakeholders including NGOs
Establishment of water testing laboratories at district level for Quality Assurance.
Provision of MIS & IT Services (Data collection and mapping of services for future planning & capacity building)
Monthly, Quarterly, Mid Yearly & Yearly review of sanitation related initiatives at departmental and P&D Level.
Coordination with all the stakeholders for integrated and comprehensive sanitation related initiatives.
Encouraging NGOs participation for creation of Public awareness and Education on Health & Hygiene.
Monitoring & evaluation of the project execution through departmental committees and other agencies.
Update on Provincial Sanitation Strategy/ Plans
Desired Interventions: Safe excreta Disposal Foul water disposal/drainage Solid waste management Health and hygiene promotion
( Continued )
Main Features: Promoting CLTS Public awareness & Behavior change Different approaches for Rural & Urban areas Financial/Technical Support by Punjab Government Phased Implementation
( Continued )
Desired Outcomes: Defecation Safe Villages
Defecation Free Open Fields Defecation Free Open Drains Defecation Free Hands
Litter Free Villages
Foul Water Free Villages
Major Challenges RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS- This sector has suffered
significantly from under-investment. In urban areas the sewerage systems laid down decades ago and needs comprehensive replacement for smooth functioning.
CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS- there are serious capacity constraints in the departments particularly in TMAs/District Governments. Resultantly PLGO 2001 is not achieving the targets as envisaged.
SUSTAINABILITY OF COMPLETED SCHEMES – Currently over 3000 schemes in PHED are not functioning leading to wastage of billions of investment already made. There is a need to devise a mechanism of ensuring the sustained operation of the completed schemes particularly in the Rural Communities.
Major Challenges LACK OF COORDINATED PLANNING Different agencies are
being involved in the sanitation process (TMAs, PHED, LG&CD, NGOs etc). However there is no coordinated approach in each formation is working in isolation. Thus there is a need to coordinate and comprehensive master planning to achieve the desired targets.
LACK OF INFRASTRUCTURE MAPPING -Considerable efforts are needed to build the capacity to map, plan and manage infrastructure, interface with communities and the private sector and draw on their resources.
RESISTANCE FROM SECTOR INSTITUTIONS- Shift from a ‘supply driven’ approach to focus on demand driven inevitably involve some resistance from Sector institutions which are reluctant to implement the new concept.
Major Challenges The main challenge will be to bring about a change in incentive
structures which will allow a reform of these institutions ensuring greater transparency and accountability towards a more streamlined and regulatory role.
INADEQUATE SOLID AND LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT particularly in Rural and Small Towns. District Government/TMAs need to be appropriately technically and financially strengthened to boost up this neglected areas.
LACK OF REFORMS IN WASAs- To bring about cultural changes in the WASAs and make them more performance focused and to improve interfaces with customers. There is a need to have a comprehensive reform in WASAs to make them service delivery agencies. (Performance oriented structure)
LACK OF USE OF CCB FUNDS- Huge amounts of funds have been allocated for Citizen-Community Board projects since devolution which are not been appropriately utilized. In many cases these funds are simply not used. They have also been prone to elite capture. (Equitable resources distribution)
Major ChallengesDeclining water resources
Future Hopes for Safe and Adequate Sanitation