ovarian rejuvenation by autologous stem cell ovarian transplant...
TRANSCRIPT
Innovation Foundation
Foundation
Paris, November 2, 2018
Ovarian rejuvenation by Autologous stem cell ovarian transplant (ASCOT).
Sonia Herraiz, PhD
IVI Foundation, Spain
Disclosure information: Nothing to declare
Innovation Foundation
Remaining pool of dormant
follicles
AMH
Depletion of the ovarian reserve: follicles and AMH
P
a
g
e
2
Visser et al., Nature Reviews Endocrinology 2012.
Ovarian Aging
Diminished ovarian reserve or poor ovarian response (PR) by non-determined causes
Impairment of ovarian function
Acute premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) due to chemotherapy (ChT)
Therapeutic alternatives
Innovation Foundation
In vitro activation (IVA) of dormant follicles
Follicular rescue and live birth after IVA and ovarian fragmentation in POI patients.
Residual follicles are able to growth and be ovulated in an adequate ovarian environment.
Residual follicles
Innovation Foundation
New ways of ovarian rejuvenation
Page 4
Follicular rescue of remaining follicles by:
Ovarian fragmentation for follicle activation (OFFA).
Autologous Stem cell ovarian transplantation (ASCOT)
Innovation Foundation
RCT DO IT AGAIN
OUR EXPERIENCE
Innovation Foundation
Modification of the original IVA technique
6
Kawamura et al.,2013
Avoid IVA drugs.
Minimize cryodamage/ischemia.
Look for the best vascularized site.
Allow for natural pregnancy
Innovation Foundation
Ovarian fragmentation for follicular activation (OFFA)
IVA OFFA Drug free
Unique surgery No tissue cryopreservation
On site transplant
PI: César Díaz-García
Innovation Foundation
OFFA in POI
PATIENTS 14
OOCYTES 21
PREGNANCIES 5
LIVE BIRTHS 3
Innovation Foundation
New ways of ovarian rejuvenation
Page 9
Follicular rescue of remaining follicles by:
Ovarian fragmentation for follicle activation (OFFA).
Autologous Stem cell ovarian transplantation (ASCOT).
Innovation Foundation
Sterility after
Chemo-
and radiotherapy
Fertility
restoration
after BMT
Bone
marrow
transplant
Fertility recover after bone marrow transplant
Veitia RA, Gluckman E, Fellous M, Soulier J. Recovery of female fertility after chemotherapy, irradiation, and bone marrow allograft: further evidence against massive oocyte regeneration by bone marrow-derived germline stem cells. Stem Cells. 2007.
Hershlag A, and Schuster MW. Return of fertility after autologous stem cell transplantation. Fertil Steril. 2002.
Salooja N, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after peripheral blood or bone marrow transplantation: a retrospective survey. Lancet. 2001.
Sanders JE, et al. Pregnancies following high-dose cyclophosphamide with or without high-dose busulfan or total-body irradiation and bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1996.
Salooja N, at al.,. Successful pregnancies in women following single autotransplant for acute myeloid leukemia with a chemotherapy ablation protocol. Bone marrow transplantation 1994.
Innovation Foundation
BMDSC represent a heterogeneous group of mononuclear cells, including several hematopoietic and stromal
stem/progenitor cells.
Hematopoietic stem cell
Stromal stem cell
Bone marrow derived stem cells (BMDSC)
Astori et al. Am J Transl Res. 2010.
Innovation Foundation
Ovarian rejuvenation by bone marrow derived stem cells
1. Do Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells (BMDSC) arrive into the ovarian tissue?
2. To assess if BMDSC could induce ovarian rescue in mice ovaries mimicking Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) and Diminished Ovarian Reserve (DOR) conditions.
3. To analyze BMDSC in human cortex from Poor Responder (PR) patients xenografted into SCID mice.
4. To optimize ovarian reserve in PR patients by autologous stem cell ovarian transplant (ASCOT).
Page 2
Objectives and End points questions
Innovation Foundation
Experimental design 1
Cy: Cyclophosphamide Bu: Busulphan POI model PR model
Standard regimen: 120 mg/kg Cy 12 mg/kg Bu
Reduced regimen: 12 mg/kg Cy 1.2 mg/kg Bu
18 NOD/SCID mice 18 NOD/SCID mice
Control Group PBMNC Group BMDSC Group 1x106
human
BMDSC
1x106
human
PBMNC
100 μl of
saline
7d
MIRB labeled-human cells
Cell labeling with Molday Ion Rhodamine B (MIRB)
MIRB
nanoparticles
Ovarian hyperstimulation and mating
14
d
Consecutive matings for 3 months
Long-term effects
Short-term effects
Estrous cycle, ovaries, oocytes/embryos
Innovation Foundation
D-7 D-6 D-5 D-4 D-3 D-2 D-1 D0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14
P E M D
Control
Control
ChT Cell infusion
BMDSC
PBMNC
PBMNC
BMDSC
Estrous (E) Proestrous (P) Metestrous (M) Diestrous (D)
PR
-mo
de
l P
OI
mo
de
l
X
✓
✓
X
X
X
No
-Ch
T
Estrous cycle
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;109:908–18
Innovation Foundation
Follicles, oocytes, embryos and offspring
BMDSCs infusion increased the number of preovulatory follicles, MII-ovulated oocytes and embryos.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1st offspring 2nd offspring 3rd offspring
Litte
r siz
e (
n)
PR-BMDSC
POI-BMDSC
PR-PBMNC
PR-Control POI-Control
POI-PBMNC Restored long term fertility
First offspring
Second offspring
PO
I-B
MD
SC
PR
-BM
DSC
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;109:908–18
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
PR POI
2-c
ell e
mb
ryo
s
Control
PBMNC
BMDSC
*
0
10
20
30
40
PR POI
MII
ovu
late
d o
ocy
tes
(n)
*
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
PR POI
% P
re-o
vula
tory
fo
llicl
es
* *
Innovation Foundation
Ovarian stroma regeneration
BMDSC infusion:
Increase ovarian vascularization
Improve cell proliferation
Reduce apoptosis in stroma and follicles even in the high chemotherapy dose.
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;109:908–18
Innovation Foundation
Do BMDSC arrive into the human ovaries?
Do these cells stimulate follicular growth in human ovarian tissue?
Is whole BMDSC active or only isolated CD133+ cells?
End points- Questions
Innovation Foundation
Experimental design 2: human ovarian tissue
Ovariectomized NOD-SCID mice
human ovarian cortex (OC) from Poor Responder (PR) women
Control
100 μl of saline
BMDSC
1x106 human BMDSC
CD133+
3x105 human CD133
Cell infusion Xenograft
7D
D-7 D0 D+1 / D+7 / D+14
BMDSC
Positive selection of their
CD133+ cell fraction
Blood
Tissue sampling and analysis
OC grafts
Cell engraftment Follicular density and growth
Vascularization and proliferation of ovarian stroma
Other organs
Cell tracking
Estradiol secretion
Innovation Foundation
BMDSC: human ovarian tissue
Injected cells localized near blood vessels and close to follicles, in contact with GC.
Secondary follicles were only observed in OC grafts receiving cell injection
Pru
ss
ian
Blu
e
Control BMDSC CD133+
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CONTROL BMDSC CD133 CONTROL BMDSC CD133 CONTROL BMDSC CD133
D1 D7 D14
folli
cula
r d
en
sity
(fo
llicl
es/m
m3
) Secondary
Primary
Primordial
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;109:908–18
Stem cell infusion promoted growth of human follicles
Innovation Foundation
BMDSC: human ovarian tissue
Page 20
In human OC BMDSC
Improved ovarian vascularization
Increased cell proliferation
Promoted estradiol secretion
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;109:908–18
Control BMDSC CD133+
Blood samples
17b estradiol
Serum
ELISA
0
10
20
30Se
rum
E2
(p
g/m
l) CONTROL BMDSC CD133
*
Innovation Foundation
Human BMDSCs rescued the already existing follicles to growth and to produce healthy offspring.
Follicular rescue could be promoted by the regeneration of the ovarian niche as suggested by the increased vascularization and proliferation, and suppressed apoptosis.
Are we recovering the ovarian function?
BMDSC-based therapies could be a suitable alternative to increase the reproductive potential of patients with impaired ovarian function
Innovation Foundation
Provided that BMDSC transfer works in an animal model of human ovarian grafting:
Do we increase follicular recruitment in PR patients?
If so, how does it work?
Do we improve oocyte quantity and quality in PR patients?
Next step:
Innovation Foundation
Pilot study with 20 PR patients based on the ESHRE criteria.
Patients are considered as their own control as only one ovary received intervention.
Autologous Stem Cell Ovarian Transplantation (ASCOT).
STUDY GROUP
• Maternal age ≤40 years.
• Two episodes of PR after COS (≤3 oocytes obtained).
• AFC> 2 follicles with at least 1 follicle in the ovary that will be perfused.
• AMH > 0,5 - ≤3pmol/L.
• Serum FSH levels ≤20IU/l.
• Regular menses.
Clinical Trial Nº: NCT02240342
Study design 3: PR women
Innovation Foundation
Autologous Stem Cell Ovarian Transplantation (ASCOT)
Page 24
Clinical Trial Nº: NCT02240342
1. Mobilization of BM derived stem cells by a 5-day treatment with Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, 10 ug/kg/ day).
2. Isolation of BM derived stem cells from peripheral blood by apheresis.
3. Infusion of stem cells (volume: 40.4± 12.3 ml) into the ovarian artery by catheterism (contralateral ovary served as control).
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;110(3):496-505
Innovation Foundation
Study design: patient follow-up and IVF
Page 25
Patient follow-up
(6 months)
Serum AMH • Every 2 days during 15 days.
• Weekly up to 2 months.
• Monthly up to 6 months
Antral follicle count (AFC) • Weekly up to 2 months
• Monthly up to 6 month.
Previously reported for 12 PR (ESHRE, SRI 2016-2017)
Pick-up & ICSI
PGT-A
IVF
ASCOT
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
Innovation Foundation
High variability among patients AMH response: Two peaks at 15-20 days and 100-120 days
Total AFC significantly increased after 8 to 22 days
(on day 15 p=0.004).
A positive response was observed in 81% of patients considering:
Increase in AFC ≥3foll
Increase in AMH (2 SD) in 2 consecutive determinations
High FGF-2 and THROMBOSPONDIN-1 (THSP-1) values in aphaeresis were associated with improvement in AFC and serum AMH
No difference was detected between the control and infused ovary
PREVIOUSLY REPORTED OBSERVATIONS THAT WERE CONFIRMED WHEN ALL 20 PATIENTS WERE INCLUDED
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
AM
H (
pm
ol/
L)
Days after ASCOT
PR1
PR2
PR3
PR4
PR5
PR6
PR7
PR8
PR9
PR10
PR11
PR13
PR14
PR15
PR16
PR17
Day after ASCOT AMH(pM) Total AFC
Baseline 1.9±0.6(2.0) 4.0±1.3(4.0)
D+2 2.2±1.7(2.0) 4.6±1.3(4.0)
D+4 2.1±1.8(2.0) 4.9±1.7(5.0)
D+6 1.7±1.4(1.4) 3.0±1.4(3.0)
D+8 1.7±1.5(0.9) 5.2±2.7(5.0)
D+11 1.8±1.4(1.6) 4.9±2.1(5.0)
D+13 1.9±1.5(1.9) 4.7±2.4(4.5)
D+15 2.1±2.1(1.7) 4.9±2.2(5.0) * D+22 2.4±2.6(1.4) 6.0±2.7(6.5)
D+29 1.9±1.4(1.6) 3.9±1.8(4.5)
D+36 2.0±1.6(1.6) 4.3±1.3(4.5)
D+43 1.5±1.1(1.2) 4.0±2.8(3.0)
D+71 1.0±0.7(0.8) 3.4±1.7(4.0)
D+92 2.5±2.5(1.6) 4.4±2.4(4.0)
D+134 2.2±2.6(1.3) 3.3±2.3(2.5)
D+162 2.4±1.7(1.8) 4.9±1.9(5.0)
Positive response
81%
No response
19%
ASCOT success
0
10
20
30
40
50
AFCincrease
W/o AFCincrease
FGF-
2 (
pg/
ml)
**
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
AMH increase W/o AMHincrease
THSP
-1
*
Results: Serum AMH and AFC
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;110(3):496-505
Innovation Foundation
Pick-up & ICSI
PGT-A
COS PROTOCOL AND OOCYTE PICK-UP ICSI AND PGT-A
In these firsts attempts:
15 PR completed the IVF cycles, 2 were excluded and 3 are still ongoing.
COS protocol after ASCOT was the same than the used in the previous cycle
ASCOT
IVF study
Innovation Foundation
Results: Cycle comparison and retrieved oocytes
Page 28
Parameter Previous (n=24)
Post-ASCOT
(All, n=28)
Post-ASCOT optimum
(n=4)
p-value
Patient age (yr) 36 [34-37] 38 [36-38] 34 [33-37] <0.001
Partner age (yr) 36 [35-40] 37 [36-44] 35 [34-38] <0.001
Years of infertility 3[2-4] 4 [3-5] 3[2-3] <0.001
COS cycles 2 [1-2] 2 [2-3] 2[1-2] NS
BMI (%) 24[23-25] 24[21-25] 24[18-25] NS
FSH(IU/ml) 10.1[9.3-14.5] 12.3[9.7-21.5] NA NS
AMH (pM) 1.0 [0.9-3.0] 2.8 [0.7-3.7] 2.9[2.3-4.1] <0.001
Days of stimulation 10[9-12] 9[7-11] 9[9-12] NS
Gonadotrophin dose 3937[2475-4950] 4050[3150-4612] 4100[4050-4950] NS
AFC total - Control ovary - Infused ovary
3[0-5]
2[2-3]
2[1-3]
5[4-6]
3[2-3]
2[1-3]
8[7-9]
5[4-5]
3[2-3]
<0.001 NS
0.02
Punctured follicles -Control ovary -Infused ovary
3[1-6] 0[0-1] 0[0-1]
3[1-4]
2[0-2]
1[0-2]
3[2-4] 2[2-2] 1[0-2]
0.035
MII oocytes -Control ovary -Infused ovary
2[0-3]
0[0-1.2]
0[0-0.2]
2[1-3]
1[0-1]
1[0-2]
2.5[1-4]
1[1-2]
0.5[0-1]
NS
Embryos -Control ovary -Infused ovary
1[0-2]
0[0-0.5]
0[0-0]
1[1-2]
0[0-1]
1[0-1]
1[0-4]
0.5[0-2]
0.5[0-1]
NS
NS
NS
Cancellation 7/24(29.2%) 4/28 (16.6%) 0/4(0%) <0.001
• Optimum COS were considered when started
15 days after ASCOT or following an AFC
increase.
• Values are shown as Median [Inter quartile
range]
• Bonferroni adjustment was applied for multiple
test correction
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;110(3):496-505
Innovation Foundation
Results: Individual outcomes
P
a
g
e
2
9
PR Age Cycles MII MII iO MII cO Embryos (E) Euploid E
1 38 4 3 0 3 2 0
3 38 1 3 2 1 3 0
4 38 3 6 2 4 4 1
5 39 2 3 3 0 2 0
6 40 1 1 0 1 0 0
7 39 1 0 0 0 0 0
8 37 3 6 2 4 2 0
9 35 2 8 3 5 6 1
10 38 1 2 2 0 1 0
11 34 2 1 0 1 0 0
13 33 2 3 1 2 3 0
14 38 2 4 2 2 2 0
15 33 1 5 2 3 5 3
16 37 1 1 1 0 1 0
17 36 2 5 4 1 5 0
Innovation Foundation
OVERALL OUTCOMES
Page 30
*Blastocysts screened aCGH
** + 3 spontaneous pregnancies
IVF outcomes
(n=28 cycles/15PR)
85.7 82.1 67.8
14.3 17.9 32.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Oocyte pick-up MII EmbryoPositive Negative
PREVIOUS CYCLES ASCOT CYCLES
IVF Cycles 24 28
MII oocytes 35 51
Fertilization rate 69% 75%
Day 3 embryos 24 36 (31*)
Euploid embryos -- 5 (16 %)
Pregnancies 0 2 **
Live birth 0 1**
Herraiz et al. Fertil Steril 2018;110(3):496-505
Innovation Foundation
5 pregnancies in 15 patients (33,3%)
Last PR included have its embryos vitrified because they are still undergoing IVF attempts
Patient
Age Years of infertility
IVF Cycle before ASCOT
IVF Pregnancies
Spontaneous pregnancies
Miscarriages Live Births
4 38 3 2 1 1 1 + 1 0
5 39 4 4 0 1 0 1
9 39 5 2 1 1 0 1 + 1
TOTAL PREGNANCY RATE
Innovation Foundation
ASCOT enhances ovarian reserve in 81% PR patients
ASCOT increases AFC 15 days after procedure. 1st COS attempt should be 2 weeks after ASCOT.
IVF cycle after ASCOT resulted in more follicles developed
The IVF cycle was not specially successful after ASCOT: 16% euploidy, 1 LB
But, a total of 5 pregnancies and 3 live births were achieved after ASCOT, 2 women having 2 pregnancies each.
Conclusions
FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Redefine inclusion criteria: Age<37, target population POI?
Improve ASCOT by using less invasive approaches.
Innovation Foundation
SUMMARY: Ovarian niche rejuvenation by bone marrow derived stem cells
Chemotherapy- induced POI and
PR mouse models
POI PR
OC from PR
patients
Xenograft mouse model: Ovarian cortex
(OC) from PR women
NCT02240342
ASCOT (Autologous Stem Cell Ovarian
Transplantation): Poor Responder patients
Acknowledgements
Dr. Mónica Romeu Dr. Susana Martínez
Dr. Nuria Pellicer Dr. Loida Pamplona
Dr. Inés Gómez Dr. Pilar Solves
Dr .José Martínez Dr. Lourdes Cordón
Prof. Antonio Pellicer Dr. César Díaz-García
Prof. Carlos Simón
Anna Buigues