originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw...

42

Upload: milo-russell

Post on 03-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships between organisms.

Page 3: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships
Page 4: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Page 66 booklet.

• What is a gene?

• DNA codes for all of the proteins in an organism including enzymes

• By comparing the DNA sequences and the proteins they code for we can look for similarities and differences between different organisms.

Page 5: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• When one species gives rise to another, their DNA sequences and hence their proteins will be very similar.

• The more distantly related organisms are the greater the difference in their DNA and proteins.

• Changes in DNA which cause species to evolve are called mutations.

Page 6: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• This is a technique which can be used to compare the DNA base sequence of different species.

• Draw and label a molecule of DNA

Page 7: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

DNA hybridisation

• What property of DNA does hybridisation depend on?

• When heated the double strand of DNA separates and when cooled it reforms with complementary base pairing

Page 8: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Why is the DNA labelled?

• So that hybrid strands can be identified- they will be 50% labelled

Page 9: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• What is the relationship between the number of H bonds shared and the strength of the DNA strand?

• The greater the number of H bonds the stronger the strand.

Page 10: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Put the title: DNA Hybridisation on your paper then follow the instructions on the next slide carefully.

Page 11: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Write in the base sequence of the complementary strands of DNA for species X, Y and Z.

• Using a different colour for each species (denoted by a key), colour the DNA of X, Y and Z.

• Now cut the strands apart – make sure you leave the sugar phosphate backbones visible.

• Now try to hybridise the DNA. Choosing complementary strands. Mix X with Y, X with Z and Y with Z.

• Using a felt pen or highlighter indicate the base pairs that are complementary. 

•  • Which species are the most closely related? How do

you know? •  

Page 12: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships
Page 13: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships
Page 14: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

DNA hybridisation

• What property of DNA does hybridisation depend on?

• When heated the double strand of DNA separates and when cooled it reforms with complementary base pairing

Page 15: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Why is the DNA labelled?

• So that hybrid strands can be identified- they will be 50% labelled

Page 16: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• What is the relationship between the number of H bonds shared and the strength of the DNA strand?

• The greater the number of H bonds the stronger the strand.

Page 17: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

DNA hybridisation in flowering plants

• So how were plants reclassified?

Page 18: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Originally all plants were classified as having one seed leaf (monocotyledons) or 2 seed leaves (dicotyledons).

Page 19: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• All flowering plants have 3 genes in common.

• The DNA base sequence of these genes was determined and compared over many different species.

Page 20: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Similarities and differences in the DNA base sequences were used to devise a new phylogenetic tree.

A phylogenetic tree for flowering plants

Page 21: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Complete the application question at the top of page 211

• - if you think it would be useful copy figure 4 into your booklet also

Page 22: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zOWYj59BXI

Page 23: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships
Page 24: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• How is the amino acid sequence in a protein determined?

• 3 bases on DNA code for each amino acid. It is the sequence of bases on the DNA which determines the order of amino acids in a protein.

Page 25: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Thinking about DNA hybridisation – how could similarity between the proteins of different species be used to see how closely related those species are?

• The more similar the sequence of amino acids for a particular protein in two species is, the more closely related they are.

Page 26: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• The amino acid sequence in the alpha and beta chains in haemoglobin were compared.

• Explain what the data suggests about how closely the other 3 species are related to humans? (3)

Species α chain β chainPosition11

Position23

Position87

Position104

Position115

Human Ala Glu Thr Arg Pro

Orangutan Thr Asp Lys Arg Glu

Chimp Ala Glu Thr Arg Pro

Gorilla Ala Asp Thr Lys pro

Page 27: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Now complete page 67 of your booklet.

Page 28: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Immunological comparison of proteins

• A third way of evidence for relationships between organisms.

Page 29: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Remember module 1?

• What is an antigen and where is it found?

• What is an antibody?

• Read the top of page 68 now.

Page 30: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Immunological comparison of proteins

Page 31: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Rabbit injected with pure human albumin

Human albumin

Rabbit produces antibodies against human albumin

Anti-human antibodies are collected and purified

Dense precipitate produced

Less dense precipitate produced

Chimpanzee albumin

Page 32: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

1. Do the Application Exercise on page 211 – 212 of NT text book

2. Answer the summary questions on pg 210.

3. Exam Question 1 page 215 and 2 page 216

Page 33: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Courtship

Page 34: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

3.2.9 Originally, classification systems were based on

observable features but more recent

approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify

relationships betweenorganisms.

Page 35: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Organisms can also be classified according to specific behaviours

• Courtship behaviour is a necessary precursor to successful mating.

• Courtship is important in species recognition.

Page 36: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Why is courtship necessary?

• To recognises members of their own species.

• To identify a mate that is capable of breeding.

• To form a pair bond that will lead to successful mating and raising offspring.

• To synchronise mating ensuring the maximum probability that a sperm and egg will meet.

Page 37: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Courtship signals

• Vocal

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bzotS1ow0Q

Page 38: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Chemical

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpLRXWZeyBQ

Page 39: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Visual

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqsMTZQ-pmE

Page 40: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z922by9_6Fw

The blue footed booby dance

Page 41: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

Or a mixture!

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjE0Kdfos4Y

Page 42: Originally, classification systems were based on observable features but more recent approaches draw on a wider range of evidence to clarify relationships

• Now try the application on page 214 of your text book.

• Then Q 3 and 2 page 216