optimizing sourcing - sigassets.sig.org/s3fs-public/working-council_sourcing... · organizations...
TRANSCRIPT
5/24/17
Time Topic Responsible
2:00pm Welcome & Introductions Snehal Sindhvad (SIG)
2:05pm SIG Working Group Concept & Structure Snehal Sindhvad (SIG)
2:15pm The Sourcing Lifecycle John Bree (NEO)
3:00pm Meeting Concludes
Snehal Sindhvad
SIG – Member Services
John Bree
NEO Group
Working Council Leadership Team
Time Topic Responsible
2:00pm Welcome & Introductions Snehal Sindhvad (SIG)
2:05pm SIG Working Group Concept & Structure Snehal Sindhvad (SIG)
2:15pm The Sourcing Lifecycle John Bree (NEO)
3:00pm Meeting Concludes
Ensure that SIG Members have a resource to turn to when they have questions concerning how organizations develop their sourcing strategies;
Provide an environment for SIG Members to network and develop relationships with subject-matter experts, thought leaders and practitioners in this business area;
Discuss sourcing strategies with SIG Members and focus on initial value assessments and optimal decision-making. This council will develop a general framework to help ensure that your business strategy is driving your decisions.
The Charter or Purpose of this Working Council is:
Working Councils are open to all SIG Members
Buy-Side participation is the core of our success!
John Bree is our Sell-side Council Leader
Time Topic Responsible
2:00pm Welcome & Introductions Snehal Sindhvad (SIG)
2:05pm SIG Working Group Concept & Structure Snehal Sindhvad (SIG)
2:15pm The Sourcing Lifecycle John Bree (NEO)
3:00pm Meeting Concludes
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
SOURCING LIFECYCLE
“The right outcomes with the right person in the right place at the right
time with the right skills and at the right price! Too much to ask?”
- Bob Rosetta, MD, Global Head of Citi’s Resource & Location Strategy
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
Governance Planning
Communications and Change Management
THE SOURCING
LIFECYCLE
- WHAT IS THE
OBJECTIVE?- COST
- QUALITY
- SPEED TO MARKET
- NEED FOR TALENT
- ………
SOURCING LIFECYCLEBEGINS WITH OBJECTIVES
9
• Transition Design
and Support
• Governance Design
and Support
• Health Check
• Supplier and
Location Monitoring
• Program and Project
Management
• Governance As A
Service
• Readiness
Assessment
• Maturity Assessment
• Opportunity
Identification
• Global Business
Services
• Sourcing Strategy
• Service Design
• Process Optimization
• Spend Analytics
• Sourcing Analytics
• Location
Assessment
• Supplier
Assessment
• RFP Process
• Partner Selection
• Global In-House
(GIC)
• Vendor
Consolidation
• Re-negotiations
• Benchmarking
• Research
STRATEGY SOURCING GOVERNANCE
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
SOURCING EVOLUTION INDEXFROM COST FOCUS TO STRATEGIC VALUE
10
BASIC
LABOR
ARBITRAGE
I
Beginning
the journey
EVOLVING
LABOR
EFFICIENCY
II
Moving up
the curve
MATURE
PROCESS
EXCELLENCE
III
Comparable
with local
peers
ADVANCED
OPERATIONS
EXCELLENCE
IV
Better than
most local
peers
LEADERSHIP
STRATEGIC
VALUE
V
On par with
world class
programs
© Neo Group
Companies who leverage global services successfully, typically progress through a five-
stage evolution – moving from a cost focus to one of strategic business enablement
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
SOURCING & GOVERNANCE MATURITYIS REQUIRED FOR SOURCING EVOLUTION
Manage Value
Manage Portfolio
Manage Demand
Manage SupplyI. Reactive
II. Proactive
III. Rationalized
V. Aligned
IV. Optimized Manage Outcomes
Includes Global In-House Centers and Partners
3
© Neo Group
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
Portfolio Data Input Multi-dimensional Analysis Opportunity Recommendation by Scenarios
All Functions/ Processes
(per Data Collected)
Operational Requirements
Business Impact and
Risk
Skill Requirements
Role Interaction and
Criticality
Documentation and Training
Technologies and Tools
GLOBALYZESM
START WITH IDENTIFYING
THE RIGHT OPPORTUNITIES
Source: Neo SourcePrismSM
4
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
THEN CHOOSE THE RIGHT MODEL13
A structured framework should be put in practice for choosing the right engagement
model
Source: Neo Group
Key Inputs
•Strategy
•Objectives
•Transformation Opportunities
•Requirements
Critical Factors
•Criticality – Core/Non-core
•Project Risks
•Requisite Controls
•Cost Effectiveness
•Knowledge – Past / Present / Retention
•Vendor Performance –SLAs / CSAT
•Governance -Outcomes
Decision
•Supplier
•What goes where -Portfolio Assessment
•Contracting
•Engagement Model
•Governance Framework
Planning
•Project Scoping
•Pricing
•Resources
•Measurements & Monitor – Tollgates, Reviews, Approvals, SLAs, etc.
•Governance Structure & Modalities
•Health checks -Continuous Improvements
Implementation
•Project Charter
•Project Plan
•Communications & Change Management
•Training
•Knowledge Management Systems
•Meeting & Reporting Cadence
•Published SLAs & Outcomes
Within Client’s Organization In Collaboration with Supplier
HR
Fin
ance
Pro
cure
men
t
Corporate ServicesL
egal
Sec
uri
ty
Glo
bal
Au
dit
EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE FOCUSED ON OUTCOMES
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
SOURCING ENGAGEMENT MODELSDEPEND ON PRICING & GOVERNANCE CHOICES
14
Multiple sourcing models
Most use the following or a combination of these for their operations
Governance Based Model
Pricing Based ModelTime & Material
Fixed Price
Managed Capacity
As name suggests, the model is Price based
Guidelines based on pricing of the work order
Based on governance strategies deployed for
projects
Client Managed
Supplier Managed
Co - Managed
Transaction Based
Managed ServicesMost commonly seen as staff
augmentation, managed capacity and
managed services
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
EXAMPLE: CHOOSING THE RIGHT MODEL15
Business
Staff Augmentation Capacity Model Managed Services
Core Non Core
Controls
Resource
Deployment
Visibility
Need to Control
Resources
Control Via
Deliverables
Cost Predictability
Time & Material, Ever-
changing Projections
Fixed Measurable
Budgets
Knowledge Management
Knowledge of
Individuals
Experience and Expertise
of Firm/CoE
Service Level Discipline/Maturity
Unstructured
SLAsStructured SLAs
Vendor Capability
Early Stage Leading Practices, Continuous
Improvements, Innovation
Criticality
High LowResource
Retention
High Low
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
USE REAL-TIME DATA, TRENDS AND ANALYTICSTO SUPPORT SOURCING DECISIONS
16
Source: Supply WisdomSM
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
MACRO ECONOMIC
ATTRACTIVENESS
• Macro Economic Indicators
• Currency attractiveness
GEOPOLITICAL ATTRACTIVENESS
• Political risk
• Crime rate
• Terrorism/Ethnic tension/Social
unrest
FINANCIAL ATTRACTIVENESS
• Salary Level (ITO, BPO, KPO) for
entry level
• Salary growth (ITO, BPO, KPO) for
entry level
• Rent (Grade 1 CBD)
• Rent growth
• Cost of living Increase
INDUSTRY ATTRACTIVENESS
• Industry size ITO
• Industry size BPO
• Industry size KPO
• Projected Industry growth ITO
• Projected Industry growth BPO
• Mature Service Providers
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
ATTRACTIVENESS
• Ease of doing business
• Quality of life
• Cultural compatibility/Support
facilities for expats
• Access to healthcare
• Pollution levels
• Quality of education
• Business and support amenities/5
star rooms
INFRASTRUCTURE
ATTRACTIVENESS
• Government support/incentive
• FDI attractiveness
• Power supply
• Transportation
• Software parks/SEZ’s
HUMAN RESOURCES
ATTRACTIVENESS
• Scalability risk
• Number of Industry employees
• Attrition – Overall and client
LOCATION
ASSESSMENT
MODEL
KNOW WHAT TO DO WHERE17
© Neo Group
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
CAPTIVE/IN-HOUSEIS ANOTHER OPTION
18
Foundational
Elements
GBS Building
Blocks
• Appetite for more
transitions
• Account management set-
up and capability
• Creating goodwill
Stakeholder
Management
• Service depth
• Delivery methodologies
• Project & Performance
Management
• QA
Service
Capability
• Market orientation
• Clarity of vision
• Capability to handle
growth
• Decision making process
• Empowerment
• Cost effectiveness
Operating
Model
• Recruitment & Staffing
• Enhancing brand
presence
• Training
• Performance Evaluation
• Focus on HCM
• HR team capability
HRM
Processes
• Focus on new and
emerging technologies
• Technical thought
leadership
• Knowledge sharing
Technology
Edge
• Alignment of management
• Management depth
Leadership
Capability
© Neo Group
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
SOURCE: PARTNER EXPERIENCE &
CAPABILITIES19
Vendors/ Suppliers are requested to provide data and support their responses in regards to their ‘Experience & Capabilities’ for the following.
This needs to be their representative experience toward:
• Domain and Verticals
o Percentage of Total Revenues
o Number of Domain/ Vertical Clients and top 3 among them
o Top 3 Locations by FTEs that serve similar clients
o No. of FTEs by Total Experience Level that include experts
o Center of Excellence (COE) data
o Accreditations and/ or Certifications
o Supplier Proficiency Level
• Functional Capabilities
o Functional Area
o Top 3 Clients by Revenue
o Top 3 Clients by FTEs
o Number of FTEs by total experience level
o Center of Excellence (COE) data
o Accreditations and/ or Certifications
o Supplier Proficiency Level
• Technical Skills
o Technology/ Tool Name
o Number of unique clients with similar technology/ tools
o Top 3 Locations by FTEs
o No. of FTEs by Total Experience Level
o Accreditations and/ or Certifications
o Supplier Proficiency Level
The above areas will be scored and the results will be heat-mapped to provide overall coverage and unique capabilities of the Vendors/
Suppliers
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
A GOOD TRANSITION FRAMEWORKDRIVES STABLE OPERATIONS
20
Setup Transition Governance
Plan Transition
Review Scope TransitionBaseline
Knowledge Transfer
Shadow Support
Reverse Shadow Support
Steady State (Stabilization)
Transition Governance
Time
EXECUTEMOBILIZEPLAN
Tech
nolo
gy
Pro
ce
ss
Peo
ple
Change management
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
A COLLABORATIVE TRANSITION SCORECARD
DRIVES RIGHT INCENTIVES
21
TRANSITION PLAN
DOCUMENTATION
RISK ASSESSMENT - FEMA
READINESS CHECKLIST
ISSUES AND ESCALATIONS*
SKILL MATRIX AND RESOURCING
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
REPORTING
TRANSITION
SCORECARDA TYPICAL SCORECARD WILL
ENCOMPASS EACH OF THE
FOLLOWING AREAS
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
Governance
Organizational Governance
Functional Governance
Operational Governance
Coordination, communication & control between
process owners
Provide for knowledge transfer and knowledge
management
Opportunity Identification & enable demand aggregation
Cross-functional, cross-geography, cross-vendor alignment
Manage global sourcing contracts and service
levels
Manage vendor relationships, performance and
resources
Manage scope and integration
Reporting
Align business strategy & global services initiatives
Guide execution of enterprise wide globalization initiatives
Ensure adequate risk mitigation and controls
Program sponsorship
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
GOVERNANCE
MODEL
A robust governance model is
layered and addresses day to day
operations while considering
strategic and enterprise wide
objectives. Organizational and
Functional Governance is managed
by a Global Sourcing Center of
Excellence (GSCoE) while
Operational Governance is
managed by a PMO or VMO
GOVERNANCE HELPS REALIZE DESIRED OUTCOMES
22
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
Market Data (country, city,
supplier)
Price pressure and trends
Wage inflation
Operating cost escalation
Infrastructure risks
SLA Performance, CSAT, etc. …..
Balanced Scorecard Metrics...
Transaction Level Performance….
Vendor Management Audits…...
Mark
et
Supplie
rIn
tern
al
BALANCED
SCORECARD
A balanced scorecard
methodology and library to
create performance
transparency and benchmarking
capability
A BALANCED SCORECARD SUPPORTSBETTER PARTNER MONITORING
23
Source: Supply WisdomSM
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
RISK
RATINGNEGLIGIBLE LOW MODERATE HIGH EXTREME
SUPPLIERRISKS
FINANCIAL CLIENTS PEOPLE ALLIANCES
SERVICECAPABILITY
GOVERNANCE INFRASTRUCTURE THOUGHTLEADERSHIP
CITYRISKS
MACRO-ECONOMIC FINANCIAL BUSINESS INFRASTRUCTURE
GEO-POLITICAL LEGAL SCALABILITY QUALITY OF LIFE
COUNTRYRISKS
MACRO-ECONOMIC FINANCIAL BUSINESS INFRASTRUCTURE
GEO-POLITICAL LEGAL SCALABILITY QUALITY OF LIFE
2 4 6 8 10RISK
MONITORING
MODEL• Proactively monitors in real-time
Countries, Cities and Suppliers
globally
• Shares valuable insights built from
sophisticated analytical models
• Delivers actionable guidance from
a team of expert industry analysts
PROACTICE RISK MONITORINGAVOIDS DISRUPTIONS
24
Source: Supply WisdomSM
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
ENSURE CONSISTENT & EXTENSIVE SERVICE LEVELS25
It is important to follow a consistent service level framework
Used In-house
New Created
In-house
Supplier Provided
Advisor Provided
Co-Developed
(Advisor/Supplier)
SOURCES
Impact
- What affects the business
Peer Shared
EVALUATE & DEFINE
CRITICAL
SERVICE LEVELS (CSL)
Leading & Lagging Indicators
CRITICAL DELIVERABLES
REPORTING
SERVICE LEVELS (RSL)
MONITOR –
“What Really Matters”
Influence
– Will it have an influencing
effect on the outcomes
– Will it manage stakeholders
expectations
Measurable
– Can it be measured
objectively
Relationship
- Will the measures contribute to
knowledge sharing and on-going
improvements
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
DEVELOPING PEOPLE SKILLSENABLES ONGOING SUCCESS
26
Notes
RationaleProcess Frequency
SLA Monitoring
SLA Analysis and reporting
Calculate & monitor utilization
Calculate Performance Credit, Earn-back
Validate RCA and track progress
Validate Performance Credit, Earn-back
Manage Continuous Improvement (SLAs)
Review service level applicability
Publish Business/IT Availability Index
Review
Financial Impact
Control
Capacity Estimation/Productivity
Operational Excellence
Financial Impact
Continuous Improvement
Business Continuity
Redefining SLAs
Hiring Fulfillment / Metrics Business Continuity
Daily / Weekly
Monthly
Daily
Yearly
Yearly
Ongoing
Ongoing
Quarterly
Monthly
Monthly
Client Provider
Monitor critical deliverables CSATYearly
Engagement Operational Health - check Ops and Relationship ImprovementsQuarterly
Cultural Integration – One-Team-Team Operational ExcellenceOn-Going
Project Reporting ControlMonthly
Contractual Compliance Audits CSAT Legal ComplianceYearly
Change
Mgmt.
& SkillsTOOLS
TRAINING
PROCESS
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
Executive Sponsorship
Goals & Expectations
Portfolio Strategy
Delivery Model
Steady State
Governance
Transition
Performance –
Productivity / Quality
HR Lifecycle
Roles /
Responsibilities
Change
Management
Communications
Strategy
Landscape
Roadmap
Security
Physical Security
Technical Security
Contractual Delivery
Compliance
Certifications
TECHNOLOGY COMPLIANCE
PROCESSPEOPLE
STRATEGY
HEALTH CHECK
HEALTH CHECKS CAN ENSURE BEST PRACTICES
27
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
USA 129 Newbury St., Suite 400
Boston, MA 02116, USA
www.neogroup.com
617.830.1664
AMSTERDAM,
NETHERLANDS
BANGALORE, INDIA
BOGOTA, COLOMBIA
GUADALAJARA, MEXICO
NEW YORK, USA
SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
SAN FRANCISCO, USA
SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA
John BreeSVP & Partner
+1.732.306.8022
www.NeoGroup.com
www.SupplyWisdom.com
© 1999-2017 Neo Group Inc. Proprietary
THANK
YOU!
QUESTIONS?28