optimizing quantification of mab and adc aggregates · detecting and quantifying mab aggregation...
TRANSCRIPT
AdvanceBio SEC Optimizing Quantification of mAb and ADC Aggregates: Speed versus Resolution
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 1
Optimizing Quantification of mAb and ADC
Aggregates: Speed versus Resolution
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 2
What is size exclusion chromatography?
Why is resolution important?
How much resolution is needed?
How to speed up the analysis?
What is the benefit?
Dr Linda Lloyd, BioColumns Product Manager
Dr Andrew Coffey, Senior Applications Chemist
Aggregation
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 3
Aggregates can be tangled clusters of denatured mAbs
• Irreversibly formed during production
• Expression, downstream processing
• Storage as drug substance or drug product
Aggregates can be ordered structures of native mAbs
• May be reversible or irreversibly
• Interaction may be hydophobic and/or electrostatic
• Dimer produced from association of two monomers
Aggregation is impacted by
• Biochemical and biophysical properties of the mAb
• Physicochemical environment
Aggregation impacts
• Process yield and economics
• Product immunogenicity
When does aggregation matter?
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 4
• candidate
selection
• protein
cloning
Discovery
• clone
selection
• stability
studies
• QbD
Development
• process
monitoring
• Continuous
improvements
• QC
Manufacture
Characterization
SEC for soluble aggregates
Aggregation is critical quality attribute - size exclusion chromatography is required technique to quantify aggregation
100s of samples for analysis
Clone selection/development
• Bio-Monolith Protein
A/Protein G
How much is
expressed
• AdvanceBio SEC How much is
aggregated
• AdvanceBio Glycan
Mapping
What is the
glycan form
Formulation
Drug product (DP) requires
formulations that meet the target
product profile (TPP)
Require analytical methods needed
to determine stability and set shelf
life
Requires high throughput assays to
monitor multiple formulations as a
function of time
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 5
Small number of samples
Candidate Characterization
• Multiple
characterization
techniques
What is the
candidate
• Aggregation What are the
critical quality
attributes
• Is the level of
aggregation likely to
cause late stage failure
Is it suitable to
move forward
Quality control
Batches of drug product (DP) must
meet the defined impurity profile
Require analytical methods with
sensitivity and resolution to ensure
batch complies with specification
Require robust analytical methods
that deliver accurate data for every
sample
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 6
What does that mean for SEC
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 7
• Columns must deliver accurate, precise quantitation for mAbs and next generation biologics
• High resolution for more accurate quantitation
• Faster analysis speeds for delivery to deadlines
• No change to sample integrity
• Sensitivity for quantitation at low levels - 1 to 5%
• Methods must be easily transferred to other locations
AdvanceBio SEC columns improve lab productivity by providing robust, reliable methods
that eliminate sample re-analysis and increased sample throughput.
Size Exclusion Chromatography
• Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) allows the separation of
molecules based on the size in solution.
• Larger molecules are excluded from the pores of the stationary
phase and elute first.
• Smaller molecules diffuse into the pores and elute later.
• There is no interaction between the analyte and the stationary
phase.
• It is the method of choice for quantifying the amount of
aggregates, dimers and larger oligomers, of therapeutic
proteins such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 8
SEC animation
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 9
Detecting and quantifying mAb aggregation
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 10
Detecting and quantifying mAb aggregation
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 11
Detecting and quantifying mAb aggregation
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 12
# Time Area Area
%
1 4.66 2.8 0.06
2 5.18 10.9 0.22
3 5.72 32.3 0.66
4 6.58 4849.0 98.40
5 8.13 20.4 0.41
6 8.80 14.2 0.29
1 2
3
4
5 6
Some definitions
• Column volume
• Exclusion limit / Void volume
• Interstitial volume
• Pore volume
• Total permeation
• Non-specific interaction
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 13
Column Dimensions: 7.8 x 300 mm
Column Volume = 14.3 mL
What are these inside the column?
• Interstitial volume
• Pore volume
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 14
Interstitial or inter-
particle volume
Pore Volume or intra-
particle volume
Silica particles
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Norm.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
What are these regions on a chromatogram?
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 15
Colu
mn V
olu
me
Pore
Volume
Interstitial
Volume
Exc
lusi
on
Lim
it /
Void
volu
me
Tota
l P
erm
eati
on
Non
-speci
fic
inte
ract
ion?
Rule Number #1
• Choose the right pore size
– It is essential to select a column that has pores
sufficiently large to allow your molecule to
permeate into the pore structure of the stationary
phase and not be excluded.
– It is also essential to choose a pore size that is not
too large.
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 16
For monoclonal antibodies the optimum pore size is around 300Å …
Agilent SEC pore size selection
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 17
SEC Chromatogram of proteins
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 18
AdvanceBio SEC 300Å, 7.8 x 300 mm, 2.7 µm
1.0 mL/min, 150 mM Sodium Phosphate pH 7.0
UV, 220 nm
1 Thyroglobulin aggregates
2 Thyroglobulin
3 γ-Globulin (IgG) dimer
4 γ-Globulin (IgG)
5 Ovalbumin dimer
6 Ovalbumin
7 Myoglobin
8 Uridine
9 Vitamin B12 1
2
3
4
5
6 7
8
9
Creating a calibration curve
Thyroglobulin
dimer Thyroglobulin
IgG dimer
IgG Ovalbumin
dimer Ovalbumin
Myoglobin
Aprotinin
Neurotensin Angiotensin II
Uridine
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00
Log(M
W)
Retention Time (min)
AdvanceBio SEC 300Å, 7.8 x 300 mm, 2.7µm Protein or Peptide MW Log(MW) RT (min)
Thyro Aggs 1340000 6.13 4.64
Thyroglobulin 670000 5.83 5.13
IgG Dimer 300000 5.48 5.65
γ-Globulin 150000 5.18 6.53
Oval Dimer 88600 4.95 7.25
Ovalbumin 44300 4.65 8.14
Myoglobin 16950 4.25 8.78
Aprotinin 6511 3.81 9.21
Neurotensin 1672 3.22 10.36
Angiotensin-II 1040 3.02 10.64
Uridine 244 2.39 11.22
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 19
What impacts resolution
• Resolution at half height
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 20
Rt - Rt2 1
W1/2
𝑅𝑠 = 2 (𝑅𝑡2 − 𝑅𝑡1)
1.7 (𝑊0.5 1 + 𝑊0.5 2)
We have maximised Pore Volume in
order to give greatest retention time
difference …
… we have optimised Particle Size
and column loading in order to give
sharper peaks (while retaining the
ability to run on 400 bar instruments).
Mobile phase selection
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 22
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
50
100
150
200
250
4.6 x 300 mm
150 mM Sodium Phosphate, pH 7.0
0.35 mL/min
4.6 x 300 mm
20 mM Tris, 90mM NaCl, pH 8.0
0.35 mL/min
AdvanceBio SEC columns
• Optimized pore size – 300Å for larger biotherapeutic proteins, mAbs and ADCs
– 130Å covering a wide range of smaller proteins and polypeptides
• Optimized pore volume – Highest pore volume for maximum resolution
• Optimized particle size – 2.7 µm totally porous particles for high efficiency and applicability
from 400 bar to UHPLC
• Optimized column loading – Multiple column dimensions for speed and resolution with
maximum lifetime
• Optimized surface chemistry – Proprietary hydrophilic coating to reduce non-specific interactions
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 23
Characterization and QC
Need more
resolution
Slower flow
rates
Multiple
columns
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 24
Need more resolution
• Resolution at half height
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 25
Rt - Rt2 1
W1/2
𝑅𝑠 = 2 (𝑅𝑡2 − 𝑅𝑡1)
1.7 (𝑊0.5 1 + 𝑊0.5 2)
Column Performance Uridine (small molecule)
120000
125000
130000
135000
140000
145000
150000
155000
160000
165000
170000
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Pla
tes/
m
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Plates/m
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 26
Column Performance Vitamin B12
100000
110000
120000
130000
140000
150000
160000
170000
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Pla
tes/
m
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Plates/m
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 27
Column Performance Resolution (BioRad and IgG I9640)
1.30
1.40
1.50
1.60
1.70
1.80
1.90
2.00
2.10
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Reso
luti
on F
act
or
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Rs IgA/IgG
Rs Ova/Myo
Rs I9640
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 28
Increased sample throughput
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 29
Need more
speed
Shorter 15cm
columns
Faster flow
rates
Initial Conditions
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
50
6.9
90
8.0
00
8.7
57
10.1
80
11.6
64
15.2
20
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 30
5µm Diol-type SEC column
7.8 x 300 mm
Flow rate 0.8 mL/min
Run time 20 min
Resolution monomer / dimer 1.77
Same flow rate, 15cm column Same resolution, much shorter run time
min1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
mAU
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2.9
12
3.3
18
3.5
77
4.0
93
4.8
77
7.1
64
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 31
AdvanceBio SEC 300
7.8 x 150 mm
Flow rate 0.8 mL/min
Run time 9 min
Resolution monomer / dimer 1.73
Highest flow rate tested, 15cm column Resolution less than 1.5, but sufficient for rapid screening
min0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
mAU
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1.5
58
1.9
13
2.1
91
2.6
09
3.8
19
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 32
AdvanceBio SEC 300
7.8 x 150 mm
Flow rate 1.5 mL/min
Run time 5 min
Resolution monomer / dimer 1.45
Flow rate impact on sample throughput
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
0.8 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0
Sam
ple
Thro
ughput
*
Run T
ime (
min
s)
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Throughput (samples/24h) Run Time
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 33
Increase speed of analysis
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Norm.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 34
0.5 mL/min
1.0 mL/min
1.5 mL/min
Signals normalised and aligned.
Run time reduced from 12 to 4
minutes
3X sample throughput
Sufficient resolution
AdvanceBio SEC 300Å 7.8 x 150 mm
Reduce laboratory running costs
More to
increase
productivity
Longer column
lifetime
Fewer
columns,
reduced
downtime
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 35
Extended Lifetime
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 36
Every 200 injections of IgG I9640 during
extended lifetime experiment (14 days; up to
1200 injections)
Economic Value
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 37
250Å Diol-type, 5µm 7.8 x 300 mm
Economic value calculation …
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 38
250Å Diol-type, 5µm
Multiple sample types
mAbs and next generation biologics
Need more
generic
methods
Reduced
secondary
interactions
Fewer
methods,
better peak
shape
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 39
Difficult Samples Problematical mAbs …
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 40
290Å 3µm
250Å Diol-type, 5µm AdvanceBio SEC 300Å
300Å 3µm
Difficult Samples Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs)
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 41
290Å 3µm
250Å Diol-type, 5µm
200Å 1.7µm
AdvanceBio SEC 300Å
Recap
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 42
Need more speed Shorter 15cm columns Faster flow rates
Need more resolution Slower flow rates Multiple columns
Need more generic
methods
Reduced secondary
interactions
Fewer methods, better
peak shape
Column choice - resolution or speed
- requires different column formats
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 43
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0
Flow Rate (mL/min)
Two 7.8 x 300 mm
7.8 x 300 mm
7.8 x 150 mm
Speed Resolution
Separation of protein standards and IgG
using different Agilent HPLC systems
min0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Norm.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Agilent 1100 LC System
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Norm.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
Agilent 1260 Bio-inert LC System
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Norm.
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Agilent 1290 Infinity LC System
Conditions
Eluent 150 mM Sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0
Flow rate 1.0 mL/min (7.8 mm ID columns) or 0.35 mL/min (4.6 mm ID columns)
Temperature Ambient
Sample 1 mg/mL protein concentration
Instrument Agilent 1100 HPLC instrument (legacy, 400 bar)
1260 Infinity Quaternary Bio-inert (600 bar)
1290 Infinity Binary LC with G1315D DAD and Bio-inert flow cell (1200 bar)
Wavelength 220 nm
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 44
Agilent AdvanceBio SEC Ensuring reliability
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 45
min0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Injection #1
Injection #1200
Injection #800
Injection #400
Injection Rs
#1 2.16 (after 0 days)
#400 2.16 (after 4 days)
#800 2.20 (after 8 days)
#1200 2.19 (after 12 days)
Effect of analysis temperature of on monomer /
dimer / aggregate content of γ-Globulin
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 46
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
65.0%
67.0%
69.0%
71.0%
73.0%
75.0%
77.0%
79.0%
81.0%
83.0%
85.0%
15°C 20°C 25°C 30°C 35°C 40°C 45°C 50°C 55°C
Aggs
and D
imer
Are
a %
Monom
er
Are
a %
Injection Number
Monomer% Aggs% Dimer%
Control of temperature
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 47
min4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5
mAU
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
15 °C 167.5 bar
Rs 1.758
Monomer Area% 74.8%
25 °C 140.6 bar
Rs 1.825
Monomer Area% 73.9%
Column dimensions
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 48
4.6 or 7.8 x 300 mm 4.6 or 7.8 x 150 mm
Two 4.6 or 7.8 x 300 mm
min5 10 15 20 25
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
min5 10 15 20 25
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
50
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
min1 2 3 4 5 6 7
mAU
0
50
100
150
200
250
min1 2 3 4 5 6 7
mAU
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Robustness or sensitivity
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 49
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
min2 4 6 8 10 12 14
mAU
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
4.6 mm ID (1260 Bio-inert)
Flow rate 0.35 mL/min
Inj vol 2 µL
7.8 mm ID (1260 Bio-inert)
Flow rate 1.0 mL/min
Inj vol 6 µL
Pressure 174.4 bar
Rs 1.91
Rs 2.23
Pressure 154.1 bar
Rs 1.82
Rs 2.12
Resolution 150 mm vs 300 mm vs 2 x 300 mm
min5 10 15 20 25
mAU
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
min5 10 15 20 25
mAU
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
min5 10 15 20 25
mAU
0
10
20
30
40
50
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 50
7.8 x 150 mm
Pressure 102.3 bar
Rs 1.63
7.8 x 300 mm
Pressure 188.7 bar
Rs 2.06
2 x 7.8 x 300 mm
Pressure 330.1 bar
Rs 2.53
• For resolution use longer column lengths 300 mm
– Reduce flow rate
• For speed use shorter columns 150 mm
– Increase flow rate
• Generic methods for wide range of sample types
– Use an innovative SEC column that has minimal
non-specific interactions
Summary
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 51
The AdvanceBio SEC columns
provide solutions for all the above
Thank you !
February 16, 2016 Agilent Technologies 52