cdu overhead corossion mab
TRANSCRIPT
Under Deposit Corrosion of Fractionator OVHD Exchangers in Crude Distillation Unit and its Remedial Measures
Musaed M. Al-Arada, Bader Al-Otaibi, Faisal H. Al-Refai, Anil Kumar Ray, Ali R. Al-Azemi
Kuwait National Petroleum Company
Mina Abdulla Refinery P.O. Box-69, Safat, Kuwait 13001
Fax: +965-23280402
E-mail: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The Fractionator Overhead (OVHD) System of a Crude Distillation Unit (CDU) consists of shell and
tube type Exchangers. Carbon Steel metallurgy is used in both shell and tube with Fractionator Tower
OVHD vapor on shell side and crude feed on the tube side. Since commissioning, frequent failures of
these exchangers have been reported causing loss of production. Failures were in the form of erosion-
corrosion, pitting and general wall thickness loss on the tube Outer Diameter (OD) surface. These
failures were as a result of under deposit corrosion due to presence of moderate to heavy fouling and
formation of Iron Sulfide scales. Initially there were three exchangers and one more was added
afterwards to combat erosion-corrosion problem of tubes. Tubes with different higher metallurgy (UNS
# K41545, K90941) were tried from time to time however no improvement was noticed in the frequency
of failure of tubes. Poor supply of wash water to the fractionator OVHD system resulted in accumulation
of fouling on the tube OD surfaces leading to under deposit corrosion.
Keywords: under deposit corrosion, fouling, tube OD, carbon steel, pitting, general wall loss, CDU,
OVHD.
1. INTRODUCTION
The Crude Distillation Unit of Mina Abdullah Refinery(2)
was originally designed for a throughput of
156 Kilo Barrels Per Day (KBPD); however it is presently being operated at 190 KBPD after the revamp
carried out in September 2001. Main products of the unit are Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG), Naphtha,
Kerosene,(3)
Diesel and Atmospheric Residue. A brief process flow diagram of crude unit is shown in
fig. 1. (1)
Unified Numbering System for Metals and Alloys (UNS). UNS numbers are listed in Metal & Alloys in the Unified
Numbering System, 10th ed. (Warrendale, PA: SAE International and West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2004).
(2) Trade name and
(3) Trade name.
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
1
Paper No.
2225
2. DESCRIPTION OF OVHD CONDENSERS
The Crude Distillation Unit of a refinery has four fractionators OVHD exchangers (E-11-101A/B/C/D).
These OVHD exchangers are used to recover heat from fractionator overhead vapours. Crude is on tube
side and overhead vapour is on shell side. To provide more free area for incoming vapour, a vapour belt
is employed on shell inlets of all four bundles.
Design/operating conditions of OVHD exchangers and material of construction are given in Table 1 and
Table 2 respectively.
Table 1
Design and Operating Conditions of OVHD Condensers
Parameters Shell Side Tube Side
Design Operating Design Operating
Pressure 5.27 Kg/cm2 (75 psig) Inlet - 1.4 Kg/cm
2 (20 psig) 28.12 Kg/cm
2 (400 psig)
Inlet - 21.30 Kg/cm2
(303psig)
Temperature 154.4° C (310° F) Inlet - 96.6° C (206° F),
Exit - 83.3° C (183° F) 93.3° C (200° F)
Inlet - 28.8° C (84° F),
Exit - 61.1° C (142° F)
Table 2
Material of Construction of OVHD Condensers
Components Material of Construction
Shell Carbon Steel (CS)
Tubes Carbon Steel (CS)
As shown in fig. 2, OVHD exchangers are equipped with wash water connection to remove fouling on
shell side.
3. HISTORY OF OVHD EXCHANGERS (E-11-101A/B/C/D)
Three OVHD exchangers (E-11-101A/B/C) were commissioned in 1988. One more OVHD exchanger
(E-11-101D) was introduced in the OVHD system in 2007 to combat erosion-corrosion problem on the
tubes Outer Diameter (OD) surface which was due to increase in throughput of the unit from 156 KBPD
to 190 KBPD. Tubes with different higher metallurgy (UNS # K41545, K90941) were tried from time to
time however no improvement was noticed in the frequency of failure of tubes.
The exchangers failed and were retubed from time to time; the history of retubing of the same is
tabulated below:
Table 3
E-11-101A
Nov. 1991 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
Aug. 1993 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K41545 tubes
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
2
Jun. 1997 Retubed the bundle with CS. Two UNS # S 32100 tubes were installed as test samples
Oct. 1998 51 periphery tubes replaced with CS
Jul. 2001 255 periphery tubes replaced with CS
Sep. 2001 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K90941 tubes
Jul. 2007 Replaced the bundle with fully retubed spare bundle (CS)
Dec. 2007 Replaced the bundle with fully retubed spare bundle (CS)
May 2008 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K41545 tubes
Table 4
E-11-101B
Dec. 1992 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
Feb. 1993 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K90941 tubes
Jan. 1997 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K41545 tubes
Dec. 1998 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
May 2002 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
May 2003 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
Jan. 2007 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K41545 tubes
Nov. 2008 Replaced the bundle with fully retubed spare bundle (CS)
Table 5
E-11-101C
Nov. 1991 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
Apr. 1995 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K90941 tubes
Oct. 1998 Retubed the bundle with CS tubes
Mar. 2003 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K41545 tubes
May 2004 27 tubes replaced (CS)
Jan. 2007 Replaced the bundle with fully retubed spare bundle (CS)
Dec. 2007 Retubed the bundle with UNS # K41545 tubes
Table 6
E-11-101D
Sep. 2008 Replaced the bundle with fully retubed spare bundle (CS)
4. DISCUSSION
Since commissioning the life cycle time of the bundles of the OVHD exchangers E-11-101A/B/C/D
ranges from 1 – 2 years with exception of the period from 1993 – 1996 and 1998 - 2001.
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
3
Failure mechanisms observed were as follows:
a. Under deposit corrosion – 1991 to 1998
b. Erosion-corrosion – 2001 to 2006
c. Under deposit corrosion – 2006 to 2008
4.1. Failure of OVHD Exchangers from 1991 to 1998 - Under Deposit Corrosion
Moderate to heavy fouling was noticed on the tubes OD surface of the tube bundle predominantly on the
shell outlet side. Hard and adherent scales were also noticed on the shell inlet side.
The accumulation/deposition of this fouling product on the tube OD surface shields the area underneath
those locations from the local environment, creating a difference in oxygen concentration i.e. the
shielded area will have less or no oxygen. The exposed surface where ready access to oxygen is there,
becomes cathode relative to the area which is shielded by deposit/fouling (i.e. anode area). The anode
area will get corroded because of oxygen differential cell and this phenomenon is called Under Deposit
Corrosion.
4.2. Failure of OVHD Exchangers from 2001 to 2006 - Erosion Corrosion
Increase in unit capacity from 180 KBPD to 190 KBPD in 2001 has increased the vapour load/vapour
velocity entering into the OVHD condensers and resulted in metal loss due to erosion corrosion
phenomenon. From the preferential metal loss observed on peripheral tubes OD surface of the tube
bundle (limited to vapour entry zone only) it was believed that vapour impingement in the above zones
was able to destroy the protective corrosion inhibitor film. Thus corrosive constituent H2S present in the
OVHD vapours reacts with unprotected tubes OD surface mentioned above and forms FeS. As a result,
continuous loss in the above mentioned zone may be due to alternatively formation and destruction of
FeS corrosion product layer by vapour impingement/turbulence at its entry zone.
When all three bundles were in operation, design velocity at the vapour belt opening was 25-27 ft/sec.
Against this, at a reflux rate of 11 KBPD, actual velocities were in the range of 32-35 ft/sec. Though
these numbers are higher than design, they were not alarming. When two bundles were online and other
one is out of service for preventive maintenance or emergency, the shell side velocities increases in the
range of 45-50 ft/sec. These velocities were almost twice the design numbers and this represents an area
of concern. In addition of this, shell inlet velocity also increased from 52 ft/sec to 102 ft/sec when two
bundles were on line.
4.2.1. Prevention of Erosion-Corrosion - Addition of Exchanger: In view of the higher vapour rate
and keeping maintenance requirement in mind, provision of an additional bundle (E-11-101D) was made
during General Refinery Turn Around (GRTA) 2006. Erosion problems of tubes OD surface facing inlet
vapours was found appreciably reduced compared to previous observations.
4.3. Failure of OVHD Exchangers from 2006 to 2008 - Under Deposit Corrosion
Lab analysis of the scales and fouling products on the tube OD surface indicated the presence of Iron,
sulphur and Carbonaceous matter (refer to Table 7).
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
4
Table 7
Scale Sample analysis report
Component Result Units
Ammonia as NH3 192.0 ppm
Chloride as Cl- 57.3 ppm
Sulphur total 31.4 % mass
Loss On Ignition (LOI) @ 700° C 25.2 % mass
C 0.69 % wt.
Cr 0.3 % mass
Cu 0.0 ppm
Fe 51.2 ppm
Ni 0.0 ppm
The addition of a fourth OVHD condenser had lead to low flow of OVHD vapour through each
condenser (reduced by approx. 25%). This low flow reduced the velocity but increased the
fouling/deposit settlement on the shell side. Although the wash water facility has been provided in each
exchanger (as shown in fig. 3) on the shell side to minimize fouling by salts and deposit, the amount of
wash water injected on the condenser was 2.7% of the OVHD flow as provided in the design basis
without considering the additional condenser. Therefore, the wash water quantity injected on each
condenser has been substantially reduced (approx. 25%). This insufficient amount of wash water
available for each exchanger was not able to remove/flush the fouling/deposition products.
4.3.1. Prevention of Under Deposit Corrosion - Water Wash of Individual Exchanger: The
fouling observed on the tube OD surface were mainly due to low flow of OVHD vapours and
insufficient amount of wash water passing through shell side of each condenser as the total quantity of
OVHD flow and the amount of wash water has been divided into four exchangers instead of three. Wash
water quantity was increased from 2.7% to 5% of OVHD capacity and carried out on stream
cleaning/flushing for OVHD exchangers (E-11-101A/B/C/D) once in a week for 2 hours by allowing all
the wash water to flow through one of the OVHD exchanger shell side which is to be cleaned, closing
the flow of wash water on the other three OVHD exchangers.
This online cleaning helped to remove scales/deposits from OVHD exchangers shell side and same was
reflected on the Iron analysis in tail water of fractionator reflux accumulator (V-11-103). After
completion of first online cleaning, a significant reduction in Iron level in tail water was noticed. Second
online cleaning of these OVHD exchangers was carried out after two months. During the second time
online cleaning, tail water (V-11-103) Iron level was as high as observed in the first time online
cleaning. After the online cleaning, the iron level came down to acceptable limits (See Appendix).
From June 2008, it was decided and agreed to make online wash water cleaning for E-11-101A/B/C/D
frequently on weekly basis as good results were noticed during first and second on-stream wash water
cleaning. In October 2008, OVHD exchanger E-11-101B was taken out of the service for preventive
maintenance after working on-stream for about 10 months. Visual inspection of the tube bundle before
hydro-blast cleaning was carried out to evaluate the performance of online cleaning. This time, fouling
results were compared with fouling observed last time i.e. Nov’07 (Fig. 4).
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
5
The comparison of fouling showed that on-stream cleaning/flushing have drastically reduced the fouling
this time as compared to the last inspection. The readable stencil marks on the tubes indicated the extent
of reduction in fouling (Fig. 5).
5. COST EFFECTIVE SOLUTION
Since 1991, every year at least one tube bundle was failed and retubed except during 1993 – 1996 and
1998 – 2001. The approximate cost for retubing one bundle is 35,000 USD. However, since on-stream
wash water cleaning/flushing was implemented (from June’2008) none of the OVHD exchanger has
been leaked and retubed except E-11-101B/D wherein old tube bundle was in use.
Thus, the on-stream washing of the OVHD exchanger has averted on-stream leak of the OVHD
condensers and enhanced the integrity of the crude unit. It has also contributed a substantial saving of
the company in monitory terms by avoiding frequent retubing.
6. CONCLUSIONS
After implementation of on-stream cleaning/flushing for OVHD exchangers (E-11-101A/B/C/D) it was
found that the amount of fouling observed on the tubes OD have been drastically reduced thereby
reducing under deposit corrosion phenomena.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
a. Continue the on-stream wash water cleaning of OVHD exchangers on weekly basis for 2 hours.
b. Three condensers should be in service and the fourth condenser is considered to be idle and kept
under positive nitrogen pressure to have sufficient flow of Naphtha through shell side of each
condenser which will help in minimizing deposits/scales accumulation.
8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank the management of Kuwait National Petroleum Company(4)
for their
permission to present this paper.
(4)
Trade name
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
6
9. APPENDIX
Iron level (ppm) in OVHD reflux accumulator during first on-stream cleaning of
E-11-101 A/B/D (E-11-101C was idle)
Date
(Year’08)
Iron
(ppm)
Iron level during on-stream cleaning of E-11-101D
Iron level during on-stream cleaning of E-11-101A
Iron level during on-stream cleaning of E-11-101B
18 Jan 4.56
19 Jan 1.64
20 Jan 10.3
20 Jan 3.3
21 Jan 3.75
21 Jan 1.64
21 Jan 14.8
22 Jan 12.5
22 Jan 13.3
22 Jan 23.4
22 Jan 17.5
23 Jan 9.6
24 Jan 8.82
25 Jan 7.7
26 Jan 6.7
26 Jan 9.9
27 Jan 6.3
27 Jan 10
27 Jan 119
27 Jan 125
27 Jan 10.6
28 Jan 11.02
28 Jan 20.3
28 Jan 27.1
28 Jan 33.5
29 Jan 1.16
30 Jan 2.08
31 Jan 2.16
01 Feb 1.16
02 Feb 0.34
02 Feb 3.96
02 Feb 1.96
03 Feb 0.6
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
7
Iron level (ppm) in OVHD reflux accumulator during second on-stream cleaning of E-11-101
A/B/D (E-11-101C was idle)
Date
(Year’08)
Iron
(ppm)
Iron level during on-stream cleaning of E-11-101A
Iron level during on-stream cleaning of E-11-101B
Iron level during on-stream cleaning of E-11-101D
23 Mar 2.08
24 Mar 0.56
25 Mar 0.26
26 Mar 1.5
27 Mar 0.94
28 Mar 1.24
29 Mar 1.67
29 Mar 1.68
30 Mar 2.8
30 Mar 36.2
30 Mar 26.5
30 Mar 17.5
31 Mar 2.3
31 Mar 2.77
01 Apr 31
01 Apr 19.9
01 Apr 18.3
01 Apr 16.2
02 Apr 6.9
02 Apr 5.35
02 Apr 6.51
03 Apr 2
03 Apr 71.2
03 Apr 16.8
03 Apr 19.5
04 Apr 1.8
05 Apr 0.73
06 Apr 1.3
07 Apr 0.6
07 Apr 0.52
08 Apr 1.7
08 Apr 1.5
09 Apr 0.84
09 Apr 0.66
10 Apr 0.44
10 Apr 0.41
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
8
Flash
Drum
Preheat
Exchangers
Fired
Heater
Overhead
Accumulator
Sour Gas
Compressor
Accumulator
Sour Gas to Gas Handling
Naphtha to Storage
ARDS/RCD/Storage
LPG to Gas Handling
Atm. Resid. to
Crude
Feed
Preheat
Exchangers
Preheat
Exchangers
Stabilizer
Feed Drum
Cru
de
Fracti
on
ato
r
Cold Naphtha RefluxKerosene
Stripper
Kerosene to
HTU/Storage
Diesel
Stripper
Diesel to
HTU/Storage
Steam
Two Stages Desalters
OVHD CrudeExchangers
Fig. 1: Process Flow Diagram of Crude Unit
Kerosene (3)
(3)
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
9
Fig. 2: OVHD Exchangers Wash Water Cleaning System
Fig. 3: Wash Water Facility for Each Exchanger
OVHD vapor
from T -11-101
Wash
Water
Wash
Water
Wash
Water
Wash
Water
E-11-101D
E-11-101C
E-11-101B
E-11-101A
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
10
Before Implementation of On-Stream Wash
Water Cleaning (Mar’07 – Nov’07) After Implementation of On-Stream Wash
Water Cleaning (Jan’08 – Oct’08)
Fig. 4: Comparison of Fouling Condition When It Was Opened in Nov’07 With Oct’08
FOULING
FOULING LOOSE SCALES
FOULING
FOULING
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
11
Fig. 5: Tubes Showing Stencil Marks Before Hydro Blast Cleaning In Oct’08 Which Indicates
That Online Cleaning Is Found To Be Effective In Removing Scales/Deposits
Government work published by NACE International with permission of the author(s).The material presented and the views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association.
12