opportunities. shift in perspective for infectious disease control (porter et al 1999 health policy...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Opportunities
![Page 2: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control
(Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328)
From: • Disease specificity and
verticality
• Standardised interventions
• Short term orientation
• Emphasis on product/targets
To: • Integrated/ Horizontal
linkages
• Flexibility/context sensitivity
• Longer term objectives/sustainability
• Emphasis on process
![Page 3: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control
(Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328)
From:• Limited to health sector
• Focus on individual ‘risk’
• Operating without reference to global processes
• Working on behalf of populations
To:• Linking multiple sectors
• Understanding social vulnerability: risk in the context of everyday life
• Taking globalization as referent and context
• Working in partnership with communities
![Page 4: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Tuberculosis Control as an example
![Page 5: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960
0
100
200
300
400Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4
Initial effect of segregation of poor
consumptives in work house
Segregation of poorconsumptives in enlarged and
improved workhouses infirmaries
Systematic segregation
of consumptives, rich and poor,
In hospitals and sanatoria
Antibioticera
Source: data derived from various sources including T. McKewon. The modern rise of population, London: Edward Arnold 1976.
Year
Stan
dard
ised
noti
ficati
on ra
te
Koch’s discovery
Historical decline of TB, 1840-1960
![Page 6: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Source: World Economic Forum, 2005
TB & Poverty overlap
![Page 7: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Risk factors for TBRisk factor Relative risk
for active TB disease (range)
Weighted prevalence,
total population
Population Attributable
Fraction (Range)
HIV infection 8.3 (6.1-10.8) 1.1% 7.3% (5.2-9.6)
Malnutrition 4.0 (2.0-6.0) 17.2% 34.1% (14.7-46.3)
Diabetes 3.0 (1.5-7.8) 3.4% 6.3% (1.6-18.6)
Alcohol 2.9 (1.9-4.6) 3.2% 5.7% (2.8-10.3)
Active smoking 2.6 (1.6-4.3) 18.2% 22.7% (9.9-37.4)
Indoor pollution 1.5 (1.2-3.2) 71.1% 26.2% (12.4-61.0)
From Lonnroth K et Al. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 3 March 2008
![Page 8: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
WHO-recommended Global Strategy to Stop TBand reach the targets for 2015
1. Pursuing quality DOTS expansion and enhancement• Political commitment • Case detection through bacteriology• Standardised treatment, with supervision and patient support• Effective drug supply system• Monitoring system and impact evaluation
Additional components
2 Addressing TB/HIV and MDR-TB
3. Contributing to health system strengthening
4. Engaging all care providers
5. Empowering patients and communities 6. Enabling and promoting research
Stop TB DepartmentStop TB Department
![Page 9: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Global TB Control Targets: the theory
• 2015: 50% reduction in TB prevalence and deaths
• 2050: elimination (<1 case per million population)
• 5-10% declining incidence per year:– 70% detection rate– 85% successful treatment
![Page 10: Opportunities. Shift in Perspective for Infectious Disease Control (Porter et al 1999 Health Policy and Planning 14: 322-328) From: Disease specificity](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082917/5515dda3550346cf6f8b4b82/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Global TB Control Targets: the reality
Case detection rate• 61% globally in 2006• 46% in Africa• 52% in European/Eastern Mediterranean regions • 2/3 of missing cases are in China, India, Africa
Treatment success rate• 84.6% globally• 70% in Eastern Europe• 76% in Africa