operational threat and error management ver 11

Upload: pei3721

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    1/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Threatand

    Error Management

    Flight crew guide to managing error

    Human Factors Tool Kit

    This presentation provides information and guidance to help improve decision making. It is intended to enhance the reader's awareness but it shall not supersede the applicable regulations or

    airline's operational documentation; should any deviation appear between this presentation and the airlines AFM / (M)MEL / FCOM / QRH / FCTM, the latter shall prevail at all times.

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    2/29

    Threat and Error Management

    Introduction

    This visual guide provides practical guidance to aid crews in managing the

    hazards in everyday operations. Threat and error management is a central

    safety activity for both organisations and individuals.

    There are four sections:

    1. Introduction

    2. Threats and Error Avoidance

    3. Error detection

    4. Response

    The guide may be used for self study or as part of a formal training presentation.

    The speaker notes provide additional information.

    Threat Management is the opportunity to manage your future.

    Error Management is the necessity to manage your past.

    Speakers notes provide additional information, they can be selected by clicking the right mouse button in Slideshow View, select Screen, select Speakers notes.

    This presentation can be printed in the notes format to provide a personal reference document.

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    3/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    TEM- a central safety process

    Threat and Error Management(TEM) defends against operational threats and errors,

    which if incorrectly managed can lead to undesired states. The process involves

    recognising and cancelling the effects of threats, avoiding, trapping, or

    mitigating the result of errors and managing the outcome.

    Priorities:

    Deal with any undesired state, take immediate corrective action

    Threat recognition and avoidance - good situation awarenessCancelling the effects - awareness and decision making

    Avoiding and trapping errors - plan, do, check

    Managing and mitigate - use all resources

    Golden rules

    1. Fly the aircraft take immediate corrective action2. Navigate maintain situation awareness

    3. Communicate - decision making

    4. Manage - use all resources

    An Undesired State is often the first indication of an earlier threat or error

    that was not satisfactorily managed

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    4/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Any condition or situation that reduces safety.

    Undesired states reduce margins of safety and may lead to hazardous situations in daily

    operation; - flight near Cbs, new taxi patterns.

    They represent aircraft or operational deviations from the normal standard at edge of the safety

    envelope; - an un stabilised approach, failure to go around.

    Undesired states are often the last stage before an incident or accident; - EGPWS Pull Up.

    Undesired .

    States

    Undesired Stateas close to an accident as you ever want to get

    Threats

    Other

    peoples errorsS

    E

    L

    H

    L

    Managing

    a safe

    operation

    Your errors

    Errors

    slip, lapse, mistake

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    5/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    S

    E

    L

    H

    L

    Threats- come from beyond your influence

    Threats are events or errors that increase operational difficulty and must be

    managed to maintain safety.

    Threats may be minor or isolated issues, but are of particular significance

    when they occur in combinations or in high risk situations.

    Hardware: design,

    displays, location of

    controls

    Software: regulations,

    manuals, checklists,

    publications, SOPs

    Liveware: crews,

    ATC, dispatch,

    maintenance

    management

    Environment: working

    conditions visibility,

    weather, turbulence,

    terrain.

    Threat Situation threats - mainly physical items

    Organisational threats - other peoples error

    Self induced threats - commence with your error

    Origin

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    6/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Erroran unexpected outcome

    Errors are actions or inactions which result in an unintended outcome. Errors

    reduce the margin of safety and can lead to undesired states.

    Most situations contain opportunities for error and error provoking items. You, or other people

    are always part of the situation and therefore subject to error.

    S

    E

    L

    H

    LBias, belief, CRM

    Miscommunication.

    Illusion, preconception

    Situation awareness.

    Mistake, haste

    misunderstanding.

    Liveware,You: Inattention.

    Situation awareness.

    Knowledge, experience,attitudes and judgement.

    Misinterpretation, slip, rush,

    lapse, failure to use, no

    feedback.

    Error Origin

    Good plan - made a mess of it; inattention, distraction

    Poor plan - did not understand the situationBad habits - no SOP, poor discipline

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    7/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Anticipating threats and errors

    Activities in a Safety Management System (SMS) must proactively seek out threats

    and opportunities for error.

    Management officers and pilots, instructors, andcheckers must provide guidance for avoiding

    and resolving threats and errors, and then

    minimise the resultant effects with;

    Rules

    Procedures

    Training and Checking

    Reporting and Incident analysis

    Operating crew have to manage residual risks and the situational threats or opportunities for

    error encountered in daily operation; this requires -

    Preparation, Planning, Briefing

    Gaining and maintaining situation awareness

    Vigilance, Scanning and Questioning Task and Workload sharing

    Teamwork, Communication

    Checking and Monitoring

    Following SOPs

    Debriefing

    A mistake is just another way of doing something

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    8/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Threats- Recognition and Cancelling their effect

    Threat recognition requires good situation awareness and attention.

    Obvious threats within the operating environment i.e. terrain, weather, ATC.

    Other threats may not be so easy to see and may require special attention: Operational aspects; dispatch, cabin, passengers, paperwork

    Distraction; system faults, warnings or unusual indications

    Human performance; time pressure, fatigue, stress

    Beware of multiple or threat combinations as

    the adverse effects can develop rapidly.

    Wet runway and tailwind or crosswind

    Non precision approach, no DME

    IFR, terrain, system fault

    Cancelling the effect of threats involves choosing a course of action.

    This involves awareness, decision making, checking, and monitoring.

    The effect of threats can be reduced by: Changing the plan.

    Using of alternative procedures.

    Checking and monitoring the progress of the new plan.

    Comparing planned activities with standard operating procedures.

    See the Visual Guides on Critical Thinking and Situation Awareness

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    9/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Threats manage the result

    Management includes the ability to identify, understand,

    and to project consequences into future activity.

    Threat management involves evaluating plans or options and choosing suitable

    course of action to maintain the safety of flight.

    Ask questions about your assessment of the situation and your choice of action

    Continuously assess and balance the risks involved with the choice of action

    Check your immediate objective; is this the safest , thus the best option

    Check your understanding of the planned actions think ahead

    Have you used all resources and information

    Confirm the action gave the expected resultMonitor the progress of the chosen option

    Seek an alternative view of the situation

    Compare with the planned objective

    See the Visual Guides on Situation Awareness and Decision Making

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    10/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    The most important aspect of TEM is to understand that errors always occur.

    Everyone makes errors; errors are part of normal behaviour.

    Human error is the single largest cause of incidents and accidents in aviation.

    Human error appears in many forms and severity, but most are detectable.

    Human error can be managed by avoiding, trapping, or containing the result.

    Error - action or inaction with an unintended outcome

    Slip - failure of attention

    Lapse - failure of memory

    Mistake - misapplication of a good rule

    application of a bad rule

    or no ready made solution available

    You must manage:-Yourself, attention, stress and haste

    Time, disruption, workload; monitoring

    Knowledge, situation awareness, planning

    Managing error- to err is human

    to err is human

    Violation: An intentional action deviating from rules and procedures,

    either by habit or as provoked by the situation.

    C i ht D G S t 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    11/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Error avoidance requires good situation awareness. Awareness involves a mental

    model and monitoring progress against a plan; plans help us to avoid error.

    You must create a plan; if not you could select an incorrect course of action.

    Any plan can be affected by the situation, but all plans can be changed.

    Prepare a briefing; structure it along the flight path - Visualise mental waypoints.

    What should happen; when. What are the limits; why?

    Allocate tasks - workload management:

    Who will action these tasks; when, and how?Consider likely threats and opportunities for error - ask what if

    How are these best avoided; who checks these hazards, and when.

    Error Avoidance, plan ahead

    Planning is a skill requiring experience and knowledge.

    A skill can be improved with practice; make plans and

    prepare briefings for every flight phase - self brief. Experience is gained from every plan and briefing.

    Knowledge is improved by briefing and debriefing.

    Stay ahead of the airplane

    Consider what if

    Cop right D G rne Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    12/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Attention -directing your thoughts

    Insufficient cues, competing demands

    Attention, Vigilance and Comprehension

    Pre attentionCommunication

    Teamwork, Support

    Self monitoring

    Cross monitoring

    Communication

    SOPs, Task management

    Check the plan and briefing, use SOPs

    Self monitor, focus and maintain attention

    Scan plane, path, people; identify the unusual

    Decision making, beware stress attention narrowing reduced working memory

    Beware concurrent task demands, time pressurecontrolling distraction

    The path to adverse incidents is paved with false assumptionsProf James Reason

    Good plan; plan goes wrong made a mess of it

    Good plan; plan goes wrong forgot something

    Poor plan; did not understand the situationBad habit; deviation from procedure

    Copyright D Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    13/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Manage yourself

    Self knowledge enables you to control how you think; controlling your thoughts

    enables you to stay in control of the situation and reduce error.

    Ask questions of yourself:

    Check the reasons for your decisions and intended actions.

    Monitor your performance:

    Check the results of your thoughts and actions, your workload.

    Switch on your thinking, be proactive:

    Scan the situation, now and future - Plane, Path, People.

    Review the risks from existing threats:

    Cross check with the plan and briefings, are these as expected.

    The absence of accidents does not mean there are no hazards.

    Questions for managing the mind.

    What should I be thinking about now.

    Why do I think this is safe.

    When will this happen.How do I achieve this.

    Who will assist me.

    It is not who is right, its what is right

    Self monitoring requires self awareness

    Detect adverse mental states such as distraction, lack of

    attention, or rushing,

    Stay inside your comfort zone your mental

    and physical limits, follow SOPs

    Copyright D Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    14/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Use the plan monitoring, error trapping

    Monitoring is a comparison of the plan or procedure against flight progress or

    actions to identify error.

    Briefings and procedures are the initial plans for monitoring and checking

    A briefing is the flight plan for the mind, it defines the boundaries of a safe operation.

    Briefings enable a shared mental model, but check that everyone has the correct mental model.

    Cross check your understanding of the current situation

    Take time to assess the situation, compare it with the planScan the Plane, Path, People:

    Aviate, Navigate, Communicate.

    Identify and highlight:

    Anything unusual or non standard,

    out of limit or abnormal values.

    Expect threats and errors:

    Maintain vigilance and attention,

    monitor yourself, check you actions and

    avoid risky alternatives.

    Plane

    Path

    People

    check,

    scan and

    recheck

    If the plan is not working - change the plan !

    If something doesnt look or feel right, then it probably isnt right.

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    15/29

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    A good plan- poor execution - forgot

    Sometimes good plans fail due to errors in carrying them out - a loss of situation

    awareness or misinterpretation of the situation.

    Inattention; incorrect action or thought

    Distraction; failure or inability to remember

    Misinterpretation illusion; time & workload

    Haste stress

    SOPs

    Checklists Review and evaluation, monitoring

    Airmanship - diligence

    Predictive proactive reactiveGood plan; plan goes wrong made a mess of it

    Good plan; plan goes wrong forgot something

    Poor plan; did not understand the situation

    Bad habit; deviation from procedure

    SOPs, Task management

    Time criticality, level of threat, risk assessment

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    16/29

    py g y p

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Error trapping

    Proactive Scan, general awareness, systematic check. Anything

    unusual divergence from the norm the plan

    Audit, Scan, Attention, Vigilance and Comprehension

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    17/29Operational Threat and Error Management

    Avoidance manage the situation and SA

    Controlling behaviour

    TIME

    TIME

    Self monitoringRisk assessment

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    18/29Operational Threat and Error Management

    Bad Habits- violations

    Violations are intentional actions or inactions, which violate known rules,

    procedures or norms. The fundamental difference between errors and violations

    is that violations are deliberate, whereas errors are not. In other words,

    committing a violation is a conscious decision, whereas errors occur irrespective

    ofones will to avoid them.

    There are known factors that increase the probability of committing violations:

    Expectation that rules will have to be bent to get the work done

    Powerfulness: Feeling that skills and experience justify deviating from the standardprocedures

    Opportunities for short cuts and other ways of doing things in a seemingly better way

    Poor planning and preparation, putting the person in situations where it is necessary to

    improvise and solve problems on the fly as they arise.

    Bad habits - no SOP, poor discipline

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    19/29Operational Threat and Error Management

    Good Habits-an attitude of mind

    Risk assessment

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    20/29Operational Threat and Error Management

    SOPs- Controlling and containing error

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    21/29Operational Threat and Error Management

    Error Response Priorities& Workload

    Stay in control - mitigation

    Managing normal operations

    Assess time available and risk

    Think ahead, plan and recheck

    Decision making, prioritise

    Use the safest option

    Monitor, check

    Debrief

    Undesired state management Containing the result

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    22/29Operational Threat and Error Management

    Conclusions -Hazard response

    Provide means of escape and rescue

    Contain and eliminate hazards

    Interpose safety barriers between hazards and losses

    Restore system to safe state in off-normal conditions

    Provide alarms when danger is imminent

    Give clear guidance on safe operation

    Create understanding of hazards

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    23/29

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Summary

    Avoidance - PPPP Error Avoidance1 Avoid committing errors

    Manage operational complexity2 Threat Management

    Manage their own errors3 Error Management

    Undesired Aircraft StateManagement

    4 Manage induced aircraft deviations

    A mixture of 'hard' and 'soft' defences.

    Defences-in-depthNot forgetting to be afraid

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    24/29

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Recognise threats, avoid errors

    Scan plane, path, people; identify the unusual

    Thoughtful decision making, careful actions

    Self monitor, focus and maintain attention

    Check the plan and briefing, use SOPs

    Cancel the effect of threats, trap errors

    Procedures, monitoring, checklists

    Planning and preparation, briefing

    Task and workload reduction

    Teamwork, communication

    Manage threats, mitigate the effects of error

    Assess time available and risk

    Think ahead, prioritise

    Use the safest option

    Monitor, recheck

    Debrief

    TEM- Manage

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

    Outside boxes external influences = Threats

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    25/29

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Intellectual

    Sense of

    Justice

    IntellectualHumility

    IntellectualIntegrity

    IntellectualConfidence in

    Reason

    ?S

    E

    L

    H

    L

    Outside boxes, external influences = Threats

    Links = sources ofError/ error paths

    Spaces in between = Undesired States

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    26/29

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Errors

    HFACS Principles

    Principle 1: Aviation is similar in nature to other complex productive systems.

    Principle 2: Human errors are inevitable within such a system.

    Principle 3: Blaming an error on the decision maker is like blaming a mechanical

    failure on the hardware.

    Principle 4: An accident, no matter how minor, is a failure of the system.

    Principle 5: Accident investigation and error prevention go hand-in-hand

    Longer time scales Strategic, proactive

    Management: checks and audits, data monitoring, SMS

    Operational: planning, briefing, Situation awareness, thinking ahead

    Shorter time scales Tactical, reactive

    Operational: Situation awareness, monitoring, check against plan, risk assessment,

    judgment, decision making

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    27/29

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    Situation

    The first and most important item of TEM is to accept that errors occur;

    everyone suffers error. Errors are part of your normal behaviour.

    Origins of error:

    First

    Nor

    activi

    Familiar task

    or situation

    No conscious

    thought

    Skill based

    error - action

    Rules

    procedures

    experience

    wrong rule;

    misapplied

    correct rule

    Unfamiliar

    situation or

    task

    Incorrect

    diagnosis

    Rule based

    error - procedural

    Knowledge based

    error - thinking

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    28/29

    Operational Threat and Error Management

    The structure of an accident

    In general incidents and accidents result from of a combination of latent factors -

    preconditions, and unsafe acts. Situations when the holes line up.

    Threats in everyday situations contribute to many of the preconditions; many threats result

    in unsafe acts.

    Errors dominate the unsafe acts, which consist of intended and unintended actions.

    Defensive barriers

    Safety Management

    Threat and Error Management

    Hazards

    Situationthreats

    Undesired

    states

    Potential incidentor accident

    Latent Conditions

    Unsafe Acts

    Errors, mistakes, slips,lapses. Violations

    Copyright D. Gurney Sept 2006

  • 7/29/2019 Operational Threat and Error Management Ver 11

    29/29

    Error- Attention, Thinking, and Discipline

    .

    Attention failure

    Memory failure

    Thinking failure

    Good plan, plan goes wrong

    made a mess of it

    Poor plan, did not understand

    the situation

    Bad habitDeviation from procedure

    Good plan, plan goes wrong

    forgot something

    Inattention

    Haste, Stress

    Insufficient cues

    Competing demands

    Insufficient knowledge

    experience, or data

    Insufficient

    understanding of the

    risk or consequences

    Violation

    Situation Error contributors