ontario ministry of the environment and climate change ... 220329.pdf2015-01-22 david lewis, p.eng....
TRANSCRIPT
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 220329
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Record of Site Condition Number 220329Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/12/15Certification Date 2015/10/26Current Property Use Agricultural/OtherIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Potable Ground Water, Medium and FineTextured Soil, for Residential property use
Property Municipal Address No Municipal Address, Hamilton
1 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name EMPIRE COMMUNITIES (CATERINI) LTD.
Authorized Person DANIEL GUIZZETTI
Mailing Address 125 VILLARBOIT CRESCENT, VAUGHANONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code L4K 4K2
Phone (905) 307-8102
Fax (905) 307-8103
Email Address
2 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es) No Municipal Address
Municipality Hamilton
Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll Number(s)
25-09-100-340-35800
Property Identifier Number(s)
17384-4082 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System UTM
Datum NAD 83
Zone 17
Easting 595,569.00
Northing 4,775,739.00
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use Agricultural/Other
Intended Property Use Residential
Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA
No
3 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
4 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information
Name WILLIAM DAVID LEWIS
Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act
Licence
Licence Number 90271503
QP Employer Name SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
Mailing Address 51 CONSTELLATION COURT, TORONTOONTARIO, M9W 1K4 CANADA
Phone (416) 798-0065
Fax (416) 798-0518
Email Address [email protected]
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier Municipality
Hamilton
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office Hamilton District Office
District Office Address 9th floor, 119 King St. W., Hamilton ON L8P 4Y7
5 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-12-22
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, 2013-05-06 David Lewis, P.Eng.
SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
P1 ESA Update
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, Northeast Corner of Binbrook Road West and Fletcher Road, Hamilton, Ontario
2014-12-22 David Lewis, P.Eng.
SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
6 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2015-10-26
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Northeast Corner of Binbrook Road West and Fletcher Road, Hamilton, Ontario
2015-01-22 David Lewis, P.Eng.
SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
P2 ESA Update
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Northeast Corner of Binbrook Road West and Fletcher Road, Hamilton, Ontario
2015-06-25 David Lewis, P.Eng.
SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
P2 ESA Update
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, Northeast Corner of Binbrook Road West and Fletcher Road, Hamilton, Ontario
2015-11-04 David Lewis, P.Eng.
SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITED
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
7 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No
Section 43.1 applies? No
Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2015/10/26
Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 20.61190
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property
Soil Texture Medium and Fine
Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Yes
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?
Yes
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment
AGAT LABORATORIES
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 2
8 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Acenaphthene < 0.05 29 µg/g
2 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 0.17 µg/g
3 Anthracene < 0.05 0.74 µg/g
4 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 0.63 µg/g
5 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.05 0.3 µg/g
6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g
7 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 7.8 µg/g
8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.78 µg/g
9 Chrysene < 0.05 7.8 µg/g
10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.1 µg/g
11 Fluoranthene < 0.05 0.69 µg/g
12 Fluorene < 0.05 69 µg/g
13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.48 µg/g
14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.05 3.4 µg/g
15 Naphthalene < 0.05 0.75 µg/g
16 Phenanthrene < 0.05 7.8 µg/g
17 Pyrene < 0.05 78 µg/g
18 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.41 1.5 µg/g
19 Chromium VI < 0.2 10 µg/g
20 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.04 0.051 µg/g
21 Electrical Conductivity 0.506 0.7 mS/cm
22 Mercury < 0.1 1.8 µg/g
23 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.672 5
24 Acetone < 0.5 28 µg/g
25 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
26 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.12 µg/g
27 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.7 µg/g
28 Chloroform < 0.04 0.18 µg/g
29 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 1.7 µg/g
30 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 6 µg/g
31 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.097 µg/g
32 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 25 µg/g
33 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.02 0.6 µg/g
34 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.03 0.05 µg/g
35 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
...Continued on next page
9 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.02 2.5 µg/g
37 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.75 µg/g
38 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.03 0.085 µg/g
39 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.04 0.081 µg/g
40 Ethylene dibromide < 0.04 0.05 µg/g
41 Hexane (n) < 0.05 34 µg/g
42 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 44 µg/g
43 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 4.3 µg/g
44 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 1.4 µg/g
45 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.96 µg/g
46 Styrene < 0.05 2.2 µg/g
47 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g
48 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
49 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 2.3 µg/g
50 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g
51 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.04 0.05 µg/g
52 Trichloroethylene < 0.03 0.52 µg/g
53 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 5.8 µg/g
54 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.022 µg/g
55 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 1.9 µg/g
56 Bromoform < 0.05 0.26 µg/g
57 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 2.9 µg/g
58 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 5 65 µg/g
59 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 150 µg/g
60 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 50 1300 µg/g
61 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 50 5600 µg/g
62 Aldrin < 0.005 0.05 µg/g
63 Chlordane < 0.007 0.05 µg/g
64 DDD < 0.007 3.3 µg/g
65 DDE < 0.007 0.33 µg/g
66 DDT < 0.007 1.4 µg/g
67 Dieldrin < 0.005 0.05 µg/g
68 Endosulfan < 0.005 0.04 µg/g
69 Endrin < 0.005 0.04 µg/g
70 Heptachlor < 0.005 0.15 µg/g
...Continued on next page
10 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Heptachlor Epoxide < 0.005 0.05 µg/g
72 Hexachlorobenzene < 0.005 0.52 µg/g
73 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.01 0.014 µg/g
74 Hexachlorocyclohexane Gamma- < 0.005 0.063 µg/g
75 Hexachloroethane < 0.01 0.071 µg/g
76 Methoxychlor < 0.005 0.13 µg/g
77 Antimony < 0.8 7.5 µg/g
78 Arsenic 5 18 µg/g
79 Selenium < 0.4 2.4 µg/g
80 Barium 100 390 µg/g
81 Beryllium 0.7 5 µg/g
82 Boron (total) 11 120 µg/g
83 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g
84 Chromium Total 23 160 µg/g
85 Cobalt 12.2 22 µg/g
86 Copper 33 180 µg/g
87 Lead 12 120 µg/g
88 Molybdenum 0.7 6.9 µg/g
89 Nickel 25 130 µg/g
90 Silver < 0.2 25 µg/g
91 Thallium < 0.4 1 µg/g
92 Uranium 1.1 23 µg/g
93 Vanadium 28 86 µg/g
94 Zinc 62 340 µg/g
95 Benzene < 0.02 0.17 µg/g
96 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 1.6 µg/g
97 Toluene < 0.08 6 µg/g
98 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 25 µg/g
11 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Acenaphthene < 0.2 4.1 µg/L
2 Acenaphthylene < 0.2 1 µg/L
3 Anthracene < 0.1 2.4 µg/L
4 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.2 1 µg/L
5 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.01 µg/L
6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.1 µg/L
7 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L
8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.1 0.1 µg/L
9 Chrysene < 0.1 0.1 µg/L
10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L
11 Fluoranthene < 0.2 0.41 µg/L
12 Fluorene < 0.2 120 µg/L
13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 µg/L
14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.2 3.2 µg/L
15 Naphthalene < 0.2 11 µg/L
16 Phenanthrene < 0.1 1 µg/L
17 Pyrene < 0.2 4.1 µg/L
18 Chloride 250,000 790000 µg/L
19 Chromium VI < 5 25 µg/L
20 Cyanide (CN-) < 2 66 µg/L
21 Mercury < 0.02 1 µg/L
22 Acetone < 1 2700 µg/L
23 Bromomethane < 0.2 0.89 µg/L
24 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 5 µg/L
25 Chlorobenzene < 0.1 30 µg/L
26 Chloroform < 0.2 22 µg/L
27 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.1 3 µg/L
28 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.1 59 µg/L
29 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.1 1 µg/L
30 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.2 590 µg/L
31 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.3 5 µg/L
32 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.2 5 µg/L
33 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.3 14 µg/L
34 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.2 17 µg/L
35 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.2 17 µg/L
...Continued on next page
12 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.2 5 µg/L
37 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.3 0.5 µg/L
38 Ethylene dibromide < 0.1 0.2 µg/L
39 Hexane (n) < 0.2 520 µg/L
40 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 1 1800 µg/L
41 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 1 640 µg/L
42 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.2 15 µg/L
43 Methylene Chloride < 0.3 50 µg/L
44 Styrene < 0.1 5.4 µg/L
45 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.1 1.1 µg/L
46 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.1 1 µg/L
47 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.2 17 µg/L
48 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.3 200 µg/L
49 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.2 5 µg/L
50 Trichloroethylene < 0.2 5 µg/L
51 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.4 150 µg/L
52 Vinyl Chloride < 0.17 1.7 µg/L
53 Bromodichloromethane < 0.2 16 µg/L
54 Bromoform < 0.1 25 µg/L
55 Dibromochloromethane < 0.1 25 µg/L
56 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L
57 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L
58 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 100 500 µg/L
59 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 100 500 µg/L
60 Aldrin < 0.01 0.35 µg/L
61 Chlordane < 0.04 7 µg/L
62 DDD < 0.05 10 µg/L
63 DDE < 0.01 10 µg/L
64 DDT < 0.04 2.8 µg/L
65 Dieldrin < 0.02 0.35 µg/L
66 Endosulfan < 0.05 1.5 µg/L
67 Endrin < 0.05 0.48 µg/L
68 Heptachlor < 0.01 1.5 µg/L
69 Heptachlor Epoxide < 0.01 0.048 µg/L
70 Hexachlorobenzene < 0.01 1 µg/L
...Continued on next page
13 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.01 0.6 µg/L
72 Hexachlorocyclohexane Gamma- < 0.01 1.2 µg/L
73 Hexachloroethane < 0.01 2.1 µg/L
74 Methoxychlor < 0.04 6.5 µg/L
75 Sodium 160,000 490000 µg/L
76 Antimony 1 6 µg/L
77 Arsenic 1.7 25 µg/L
78 Selenium 2.9 10 µg/L
79 Barium 49.9 1000 µg/L
80 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/L
81 Boron (total) 295 5000 µg/L
82 Cadmium < 0.2 2.7 µg/L
83 Chromium Total 4.4 50 µg/L
84 Cobalt 1.3 3.8 µg/L
85 Copper 1.5 87 µg/L
86 Lead < 0.5 10 µg/L
87 Molybdenum 39.2 70 µg/L
88 Nickel 5.4 100 µg/L
89 Silver 0.8 1.5 µg/L
90 Thallium < 0.3 2 µg/L
91 Uranium 7 20 µg/L
92 Vanadium 0.7 6.2 µg/L
93 Zinc 10.6 1100 µg/L
94 Benzene < 0.2 5 µg/L
95 Ethylbenzene < 0.1 2.4 µg/L
96 Toluene < 0.2 24 µg/L
97 Xylene Mixture 0.39 300 µg/L
14 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
None. 0.0
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
None
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)
0.0
15 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.
none
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
none
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0
16 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
none
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
none
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
none
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
none
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
No
17 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2015/10/26, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
As of 2015/10/26, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2015/10/26, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer SPL CONSULTANTS LIMITEDdoes not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2015/10/26.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, WILLIAM DAVID LEWIS, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/11/20:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
18 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
6.1.2
19 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
As an owner:
Name of Owner: Empire Communities (Caterini) Ltd
1
1. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental SiteRegistry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Reoistrv are availableforêxaÍnination_by the public and that the Registry contains- a ñotice advisingusers of the Reþistry who have dealings úith' any property to conside-rconducting their own due diligence with respect to the eñvironmenlal condition ofthe property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
2. I have conducted reasonable inquiries to obtain all information relevant to thisRSC, including information from the other current owners of the RSC propertynamed in this part of the RSC and I have obtained all information relevant to thiôRSC of which I am aware.
3. I have disclosed all information referred to in paragraph 2 to any qualified personnamed in this RSC.
4. To my knowlçdge, the statements made in this part of the RSC are true as ofNoveñber 1gth,2015.
5. I have ensured that access to the entire property, including the phase oneproperty, any phase two property and the RSC property, has-been afforded tothe qualifie-d person and to.. persons supervised by the qualified person, forpurposes of conducting the site reconnaissance.
sig Date Signed: November 1gth, 2015
Name of Person Signing: Daniel Guizzetti, President
l, Daniel Guizzetti, am authorized to and hereby do bind Empire Communities (Caterini)Ltd.
20 of 20Filed Record of Site Condition # 220329 on 2015/12/15
Request ID: 018344998 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/11/19 Demande n˚ : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 59500741 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 11:41:47 Transaction n˚ : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :
CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE
This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société
E M P I R E C O M M U N I T I E S ( C A T E R I N I ) L T D .
Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) 0 0 1 6 5 8 4 8 9 is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.
The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le M A Y 0 4 M A I , 2 0 0 5 and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.
Dated Fait le N O V E M B E R 1 9 N O V E M B R E , 2 0 1 5
Director Directeur
The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the
Director of Companies and Personal Property Security Branch.
La dÕlivrance du prÕsent certificat sous forme Õlectronique est autorisÕe par la
Directrice de la Direction des compagnies et des s«retÕs mobiliÒres.
TABLE OF AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (Refer to clause 16(2)(a), Schedule D, O.Reg. 153/04)
Area of Potential
Environmental
Concern
Location of Area of
Potential
Environmental
Concern on Phase
One Property
Potentially Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA (on-
site or off-site)
Contaminants of
Potential Concern
Media Potentially
Impacted
(Groundwater, soil
and/or sediment)
APEC-1 Entire Phase Two
Property
40. Pesticides (including
Herbicides, Fungicides and
Anti-Fouling Agents)
Manufacturing, Processing,
Bulk Storage and Large-Scale
Applications
On-site OC Pesticides Soil and Groundwater
APEC-2
Adjacent to northern
boundary of Phase
Two Property West
central portion of the
Phase One property
Not applicable: Crude oil
pipeline Off-site PHCs, VOCs, PAHs Soil and Groundwater
APEC-3
West central portion
of the Phase One
property
28. Gasoline and associated
products storage in fixed
tanks
On-site PHCs, VOCs Soil and Groundwater
Contaminants of Concern: ABNs PCBs Metals Electrical Conductivity SAR CPs PAHs AS, Sb, Se Cr (VI) 1,4-Dioxane THMs Na Hg Dioxins/Furans, PCDDs/PCDFs VOCs B-HWS Methyl Mercury OCs BTEX Cl- high pH PHCs Ca, Mg CN- low pH
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property (Refer to Clause 16 (2)(b), Schedule D, O. Reg. 153/04)
Year Name of Owner Description of Property
Use Property Use
Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire
Insurance Plans, Etc.
1818 - 1832 William Claus Agricultural Use Agricultural or
Other Use
Records indicate the property was patented to William Claus
by the Crown in 1818.
1832 – 1906 Margaret &
Jonathon Pettit Agricultural Use
Agricultural or Other Use
Records indicate property use was agricultural.
1906 - 1947 Edgar Pettit Agricultural Use Agricultural or
Other Use
1947 – 1969 Robert & Lily
Watson Agricultural Use
Agricultural or Other Use
1969 – 2013 Ernesto &
Pasquale Caterini Agricultural Use
Agricultural or Other Use
2013 - present Empire
Communities (Caterini) Ltd.
Agricultural Use Agricultural or
Other Use
Property is to undergo redevelopment for residential
purposes.
PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
The subject site is located northeast of the intersection of Fletcher Road and Binbrook Road West in the
City of Hamilton, Ontario. The subject site is an irregular-shaped shaped parcel of land with an area of
20.6119 hectares (50.93 acres) in size and is currently utilised as agricultural land. There is no known
municipal address associated with the Phase Two Property.
Potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) that have occurred on the Phase Two property include the
presence of a 508mm diameter crude oil pipeline running adjacent to the northern boundary of the
Phase Two Property, the historical presence of a 1000L aboveground storage tank in the former metal
storage shed and potential application of pesticides. In 2001 the crude oil pipeline ruptured releasing
approximately 95,400L of crude oil. Remediation of PHC-impacted soil was carried out by Stantec
(formerly ESG International) entailing the recovery of approximately 35,000L of crude oil, the excavation
and disposal of approximately 52,178 tonnes of PHC-impacted soil and the installation of a biotreatment
cell in the base of the excavation. An RSC was acknowledged for the area impacted by the oil spill and
this area is not part of the Phase Two Property.
Areas of potential environmental concern (APECs) identified on the Phase Two Property are presented
in the following table:
Area of Potential
Environmental Concern
Location of Area of
Potential Environmental
Concern on Phase One Property
Potentially Contaminating
Activity
Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)
Contaminants of Potential
Concern
Media Potentially Impacted
(Groundwater, soil and/or sediment)
APEC-1 Entire Phase Two Property
40. Pesticides (including Herbicides, Fungicides and Anti-Fouling Agents) Manufacturing, Processing, Bulk Storage and Large-Scale Applications
On-site OC Pesticides Soil and Groundwater
APEC-2
Adjacent to northern boundary of Phase Two Property
Not applicable: Crude oil pipeline
Off-site PHCs, VOCs, PAHs
Soil and Groundwater
APEC-3
West central portion of the Phase One property
28. Gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks
On-site PHCs, VOCs Soil and Groundwater
The main subsurface structure adjacent to the Phase Two Property which may affect groundwater
transport is the oil pipeline which runs west to east along the northern boundary of the Phase Two
Property.
The Phase Two Conceptual Site Model consists of this text and the following drawings:
Drawing 1 – Site Location:
Shows the location of the Phase Two Property.
Drawing 2 – Phase One Conceptual Site Model:
Summarizes the findings of the Phase One ESA and identifies features noted during the background review and site reconnaissance conducted as part of the Phase One ESA.
Drawing 3 – Borehole Location Plan:
Shows the locations of boreholes and monitoring wells on the Phase Two Property.
Drawing 4 - Interpreted Shallow Groundwater Contour Map
Shows the general groundwater flow direction and interpreted groundwater contours of the clayey silt groundwater zone.
Drawing 5 - Cross Section A-A’
Shows the stratigraphy and groundwater levels encountered during the Phase Two ESA.
Drawing 6 – Cross-Section B-B’
Shows the stratigraphy and groundwater levels encountered during the Phase Two ESA.
The Phase Two property was assessed using the MOE Table 2 Standards for a Residential/
Parkland/Institutional (RPI) land use with fine textured soil in a potable groundwater condition from the
MOE document “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the
Environmental Protection Act” (April 15, 2011).
According to the Ontario Base Map- Topographic Map website, published by First Base Solutions
Geospatial Experts, the Phase Two Property appears to be relatively flat at an approximate elevation
ranging from 218 to 224 metres above sea level. Lake Ontario is approximately 20km north and Lake
Niapenco is approximately 3km south of the Phase Two property.
According to the Ontario Geological Survey OGS Earth Bedrock Geology of Ontario Map, published by
the Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, the bedrock in the vicinity of the phase two property
is of the Guelph Formation and generally consists of sandstone, shale, dolostone or siltstone. OGS Earth
Surficial Geology Map depicts the Phase Two Property in an area of massive to well-laminated fine-
textured glaciolacustrine deposits consisting of silt and clay with minor sand and gravel.
Stratigraphy on the Phase Two Property consists of approximately 80mm of topsoil overlying native
clayey silt. Bedrock was encountered between 25.0 and 26.5 meters below ground surface.
Groundwater levels measured in the upper clayey silt groundwater unit on-site ranged from 0.22 to 5.42
meters below ground surface. Groundwater elevations in the shallow clayey silt groundwater unit
indicate a generally westerly to southwesterly groundwater flow.
The subject site is neither an environmentally sensitive area nor is it located within an area of natural
and scientific interest. During the Phase Two study, soil samples were collected and analyzed for pH. The
results show that pH is within the acceptable range for the application of the MOE Table 2 Standards.
The subject site is not a shallow soil property as defined in Section 43.1 of the regulation. The subject
site does not include all or part of a water body, is not adjacent to a water body and does not include
land that is within 30 m of a water body.
The Phase Two investigation consisted of soil and groundwater sampling on the subject site. Soil
samples were analysed from eight boreholes and groundwater samples were analysed from three
shallow overburden monitoring wells and two bedrock monitoring wells. A total of 32 boreholes were
drilled on the subject site, however, additional boreholes were used for geotechnical purposes and not
sampled for environmental purposes. Soil and groundwater samples were collected for analyses of
metals and inorganics, VOCs, PHCs, PAHs and organochlorine pesticides. The purpose of the deeper well
and some of the boreholes were for geotechnical and hydrogeological purposes. Samples were
collected from the deep wells, however, they were not used for delineation purposes as the upper
groundwater unit was analyzed and met the Standards. Soil and Groundwater was sampled and
analyzed from BH13-3, BH14-103, BH14-104, BH14-105, BH14-106, BH15-05, BH15-06, BH15-07, B15-08,
MW 14-3S, MW14-3D, MW14-2D, MW14-2S and BH14-3.
Grain size analysis was completed for three soil samples. The results indicated that on site soil is
comprised of between 68 and 92 percent fine and medium particles by mass.
Soil and groundwater analyses on the property were compared to the Table 2 RPI Standards with fine-
medium grained soils from the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) document “Soil, Ground Water and
Sediments Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act” (2011).
Chemical analyses were conducted by AGAT Laboratories. AGAT is a member of the Canadian
Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA) and meets the requirement of Section 47 of O.Reg.
153/04 certifying that the analytical laboratory be accredited in accordance with the International
Standards ISO/IEC 17025 and with standards developed by the Standards Council of Canada.
Soil and groundwater results met the MOE Table 2 RPI Standards for fine-medium grained soils for all
parameters analysed.
Source: Google Maps
SITE LOCATION
Scale: See scale bar
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
NORTHEAST CORNER OF BIRNBROOK ROAD AND FLETCHER
ROAD, HAMILTON, ONTARIO
Prepared By: PR
Date: July, 2015
Reviewed By: DL
Phase Two Property
180 Shearson Crescent, Units 1 & 2 Cambridge, ON N1T 1P4
T: 519-740-0065 F: 519-740-0045
ùD
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!> !> !>
!>
!>!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>!>!>!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !> !>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!> !>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>!>!>!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!> !> !>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>!>!>
!> !>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!> !> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>
!> !>
!>!> !>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!> !>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!> !>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>
!>
!>
!>!>!>!>!>!>!>!>
!>
!>!>!>!>
!>
!>
BINBROOK RD
FLET
CHER
RD
CEMETERY RD
7220656
7216636
711597971159797115979
711597971159797115979
711597971159797115979
6809911
6812092
6814055
6813812
68137486813746
6808159
6809123
6808984
6813169
6812231
6809886
6809859
6808723
6809738
6807222
6807221
6811841
6808750
6807216
6806761
6809960
6808957
6809573
6801547
6801539
6801457
6801456
6801454
6801453
6801452
6801450
68014496801448
6801447 6801441
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS UserCommunity
Title:
Project:
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT NE CORNER OF BINBROOK ROAD W. AND FLETCHER ROAD, HAMILTON
Project No.: Drawing No.:10001378-220 2Client:
Drawn:
Date:
Origional Size:
Approved:
Scale:
Rev:
Empire Communities
RA DL
As ShownNovember 2015
0Tabloid
0 100 200 300 40050Meters
LEGEND:250m Study Area Crude Oil Pipeline (APEC2)Location of Oil Spill (From Official Property Survey) Phase One PropertyPhase Two and RSC Property APEC1APEC2APEC3Natural Swale
River!> MOECC Water WellùD Former Diesel Ast (1000L)
¥
Note: This drawing should be read in conjunction with the accompanying report.
Source: Golden Horseshoe GIS Database 2002
Phase Two and RSC Property
Consultants LimitedSPL
SOLUTIONSENGINEERING
Client: Project No.:
Title: Borehole and Cross-Section Location Plan
Project:
Drawing No.: 3
Drawn: Approved: DL
Scale: As shownDate:
OriginalTabloid
Rev:Size:
10001378-220EMPIRE COMMUNITIES
N/A
NS
October 2015Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
Fletcher Road South of Enbridge Pipeline Easement, Hamilton, ON
Cross-Section Line
SPL Borehole
SPL Monitoring Well
Legend:Phase Two & RSC Property
Consultants LimitedSPL
SOLUTIONSENGINEERING
Client: Project No.:
Title: Interpreted Shallow Groundwater Contour Map
Project:
Drawing No.: 4
Drawn: NS Approved: DL
Scale: As shownDate:
OriginalTabloid
Rev:Size:
10001378-220EMPIRE COMMUNITIES
N/A
NS
October 2015Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment
Fletcher Road South of Enbridge Pipeline Easement, Hamilton, ON
Interpreted Direction of Groundwater Flow
SPL Borehole
SPL Monitoring Well
Legend:Phase Two & RSC Property
Client: Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Drawing No.: 5
Drawn: NS Approved:
Scale: as shownDate:
OriginalTabloid
Rev:Size:
LEGEND:
CROSS-SECTION A-A'
0
Well
Screened Interval
Bedrock (Guelph Formation)
BH
13-
02
Borehole/ Monitoring Well No
51 Constellation CourtToronto, ON M9W 1K4
T: 416-798-0065F: 416-798-0518
Water Level: Oct 28, 2014, Jun 12, 2015Clayey Silt to Silty Clay
PMR
October 2015
1001378
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTFLETCHER RD. S. OF ENBRIDGE PIPELINE EASEMENT, HAMI LTON, ONTAIRO
Consultants LimitedSPL
SOLUTIONSENGINEERING
Empire Communities
223North
A'South
0 m 100
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
mas
l) (V
ER
TIC
AL
EX
AG
GE
RA
TIO
N 1
0x)
Distance (m)
A
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
219
211
207
203
199
195
191
187
BH
14-0
7
BH
14-0
9
BH
14-1
5
BH
14-1
8
BH
14-2
0
MW
14-0
3
CLSiTill/SiCLTill
SiCL
CLSiTill/SiCLTill
SiCL
CLSiTill/SiCLTill
SiCL
CLSiTill/SiCLTill
SiCL
CLSiTill/SiCLTill
SiCL CLSiTill/SiCLTill
SiCL
BH
14-3
D
CLSi
SiCL
Limestone
215
223
219
211
215
207
203
199
195
191
187
B-B
'
Subject Site
Bin
broo
k R
d
BH
14-0
1
CLSiB
H14
-04
BH
14-1
06
SiCL
Client: Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Drawing No.: 6
Drawn: NS Approved:
Scale: as shownDate:
OriginalTabloid
Rev:Size:
LEGEND:
CROSS-SECTION B-B'
0
Well
Screened Interval
Bedrock (Guelph Formation)
BH
13-
02
Borehole/ Monitoring Well No
51 Constellation CourtToronto, ON M9W 1K4
T: 416-798-0065F: 416-798-0518
Water Level: Oct 28, 2014, Jun 12, 2015Clayey Silt to Silty Clay
PMR
October 2015
1001378
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTFLETCHER RD. S. OF ENBRIDGE PIPELINE EASEMENT, HAMI LTON, ONTAIRO
Consultants LimitedSPL
SOLUTIONSENGINEERING
Empire Communities
223North
0 m
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
mas
l) (V
ER
TIC
AL
EX
AG
GE
RA
TIO
N 1
0x)
B
219
211
207
203
199
195
191
187
215
223
219
211
215
207
203
199
195
191
187
BSouth
Subject Site
100 m 200 m
A-A
'
Distance (m)
ELE
VA
TIO
N (
mas
l) (V
ER
TIC
AL
EX
AG
GE
RA
TIO
N 1
0x)
300 m 400 m
MW
14-0
1
SiCL
CLSi
SiCL
Limestone
BH
14-0
4
CLSi
SiCL
Limestone
BH
14-2
BH
14-1
03
SiCL
BH
15-0
5
SiCL
BH
15-0
6
SiCL
BH
15-0
7
SiCL
BH
14-1
04
BH
15-0
8
SiCL
BH
14-0
6
SiCL