ongoing macro-stand alone and cge modelling approaches at ucl energy institute

25
Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute Dr. Matthew Winning Energy Institute, University College London ETSAP Workshop, Copenhagen 19 Nov 2014

Upload: iea-etsap

Post on 16-Feb-2017

107 views

Category:

Data & Analytics


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Dr. Matthew Winning

Energy Institute, University College London

ETSAP Workshop, Copenhagen

19 Nov 2014

Page 2: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Contents

1. UK Times Model (UKTM)

2. Macro Stand-Alone

3. Capital-energy substitution

4. UKTM-MSA scenarios, issues and results

5. GTAP-UCL

6. Conclusions and extensions

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Page 3: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM Energy Systems model

Bottom-up with energy technology choice Partial equilibrium, least-cost optimisation Exogenous energy demands

New features

Non-CO2 greenhouse gases Non-energy mitigation options Energy storage and other energy infrastructures New time slices (4 intra-day x 4 seasonal) Updated industry and residential sectors

Development process

Transparency at the forefront of development (data, assumptions, structure is clear and traceable, full replicability of results, comprehensive QA processes)

Full sectoral data update & 2010 base-year recalibration User constraints categorized & explicit

UKTM will be fully open-source from January 2015

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Page 4: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

MARKAL-Macro in UK

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Strachan and Kannan (2008), Hybrid modelling of long-term carbon reduction scenarios for the UK, Energy Economics (30), 2947 – 2963 Strachan, Pye and Hughes (2008), The Role of International Drivers on UK scenarios of a low-carbon Society, Climate Policy, 8:sup1, 125 – 139 Results: loss of GDP in UK ranging from 0.3% to 1.5% by 2050

Page 5: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Motivation

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Q/ Is it worthwhile linking full-blown CGE model to TIMES for overall impacts i.e. marginal benefit of using TIMES-MSA vs CGE for overall economic impacts? Q/ TIMES-MSA vs. CGE parameterisation of elasticity of substitution between capital and energy

Page 6: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

TIMES-MSA (Kypreos and Lehtila, 2013)

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

• A single-agent, single-sector neoclassical optimal growth general equilibrium model

• Cumulative and discounted utility maximisation of a representative consumer-producer agent

• Production function is energy and a capital/labour composite

• GDP comprises of consumption, investment and energy system costs

• Explore MSA parameter sensitivities • e.g. elasticity of substitution between

capital/labour composite and energy • E.g. capital to GDP ratio in the UK

Page 7: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

TIMES-MSA

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

UKTM

ENERGY SOURCES TECHNOLOGY CHARACTERISTICS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS

& POLICIES

TECHNOLOGY MIX FUEL MIX

EMISSIONS SOURCES & LEVELS FUEL & EMISSION MARGINAL COSTS RANKING OF MITIGATION OPTIONS

MACRO

LABOUR GDP

CONSUMPTION

CAPITAL INVESTMENT

USEFUL ENERGY SERVICES

ENERGY PAYMENTS

Page 8: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

TIMES-MSA

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Parameter Description Default Value

TM_ARBM Arbitrary multiplier for the last period replication 1

TM_DEFVAL(item) Default values for regional Macro constants

TM_DEFVAL(ESC) 1.03

TM_DEPR(r) Depreciation rate (percentage) 5.00

TM_DMTOL(r) Lower bound factor for the demand variables 0.50

TM_ESUB(r) Elasticity of substitution 0.25

TM_GDP0(r) GDP in the first period

TM_GR(r,y) Projected annual GDP growth in per cent

TM_IVETOL(r) Investment and energy cost upper bound tolerance 0.50

TM_KGDP(r) Initial capital to GDP ratio 2.50

TM_KPVS(r) Initial capital value share in all production factors 0.25

TM_SCALE_CST Scaling factor for cost units 0.00

TM_SCALE_NRG Scaling factor for the demand units 1.00

TM_SCALE_UTIL Scaling factor for the utility function 0.00

TM_QFAC(r) Switch for market penetration penalty function * 0.00

Page 9: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

TIMES-MSA

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Parameter Description Default Value

TM_ARBM Arbitrary multiplier for the last period replication 1

TM_DEFVAL(item) Default values for regional Macro constants

TM_DEFVAL(ESC) 1.03

TM_DEPR(r) Depreciation rate (percentage) 5.00

TM_DMTOL(r) Lower bound factor for the demand variables 0.50

TM_ESUB(r) Elasticity of substitution 0.25

TM_GDP0(r) GDP in the first period

TM_GR(r,y) Projected annual GDP growth in per cent

TM_IVETOL(r) Investment and energy cost upper bound tolerance 0.50

TM_KGDP(r) Initial capital to GDP ratio 2.50

TM_KPVS(r) Initial capital value share in all production factors 0.25

TM_SCALE_CST Scaling factor for cost units 0.00

TM_SCALE_NRG Scaling factor for the demand units 1.00

TM_SCALE_UTIL Scaling factor for the utility function 0.00

TM_QFAC(r) Switch for market penetration penalty function * 0.00

Page 10: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

TIMES-MSA

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Parameter Description Default Value

TM_ARBM Arbitrary multiplier for the last period replication 1

TM_DEFVAL(item) Default values for regional Macro constants

TM_DEFVAL(ESC) 1.03

TM_DEPR(r) Depreciation rate (percentage) 5.00

TM_DMTOL(r) Lower bound factor for the demand variables 0.50

TM_ESUB(r) Elasticity of substitution 0.25

TM_GDP0(r) GDP in the first period

TM_GR(r,y) Projected annual GDP growth in per cent

TM_IVETOL(r) Investment and energy cost upper bound tolerance 0.50

TM_KGDP(r) Initial capital to GDP ratio 2.50

TM_KPVS(r) Initial capital value share in all production factors 0.25

TM_SCALE_CST Scaling factor for cost units 0.00

TM_SCALE_NRG Scaling factor for the demand units 1.00

TM_SCALE_UTIL Scaling factor for the utility function 0.00

TM_QFAC(r) Switch for market penetration penalty function * 0.00

Page 11: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Capital-energy substitution

Both cross-price substitution and Morishima elasticity of substitution

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

SR LR SR LR

Morishima 0.41 – 0.44 1.05 – 1.07 0.14 – 0.17 0.77 – 0.80

Cross-price 0.22 – 0.38 0.36 – 0.52 0.17 – 0.34 0.31 – 0.48

North America Europe

(M.J. Koeste et al, 2008)

Page 12: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Capital-energy substitution

Both cross-price substitution and Morishima elasticity of substitution

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

SR LR SR LR

Morishima 0.41 – 0.44 1.05 – 1.07 0.14 – 0.17 0.77 – 0.80

Cross-price 0.22 – 0.38 0.36 – 0.52 0.17 – 0.34 0.31 – 0.48

North America Europe

(M.J. Koeste et al, 2008)

Page 13: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Total Energy

5400

5600

5800

6000

6200

6400

6600

6800

7000

UKTM_BASE UKTM_BASE_MSA UKTM_LowGHG_Int2 UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_Int2

Total energy 2040 (PJ)

Page 14: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Base MSA

ALL BIO ALL COALS ALL ELECTRICITY

ALL GAS ALL HYDROGEN ALL MANFUELS

ALL OIL PRODUCTS ALL OTHER RNW

LowGHG-MSA

ALL BIO ALL COALS ALL ELECTRICITY ALL GAS

ALL HYDROGEN ALL MANFUELS ALL OIL PRODUCTS ALL OTHER RNW

Final energy by fuel

Page 15: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Base

FUEL TECHS AGR FUEL TECHS ELC

FUEL TECHS HYG FUEL TECHS INDUS

FUEL TECHS PRC FUEL TECHS RES

FUEL TECHS SERV FUEL TECHS TRA

FUEL TECHS UPSTREAMLowGHG

Base MSA

LowGHG-MSA

Page 16: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Total Emissions

-100000

0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

700000

BASE MSA_035 LowGHG_MSA_Int2

GHG emissions 2040 (kT)

EMIS GHG UPS

EMIS GHG TRA

EMIS GHG SER

EMIS GHG RES

EMIS GHG PRC

EMIS GHG NEU

EMIS GHG IND

EMIS GHG HYG

EMIS GHG ELC

EMIS GHG AGR

Page 17: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Total System Costs

8500000

8800000

9100000

9400000

9700000

10000000

10300000

Total System Cost

Page 18: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Scenario 2020 2030 2040

LowGHG 0.29 - 0.67 - 0.73

LowGHG (esub 0.35) 0.21 - 0.68 - 0.72

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

GDP loss from baseline

Page 19: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Macro variables: Consumption (£bn)

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

UKTM_BASE_MSA 1458 1646 1866 2147 2607

UKTM_BASE_MSA_035 1461 1649 1868 2148 2606

UKTM_LowGHG_MSA 1463 1646 1861 2136 2589

UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_035 1463 1648 1861 2137 2590

Page 20: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Macro variables

300.00

350.00

400.00

450.00

500.00

2020 2025 2030 2035 2040

Energy System costs

UKTM_BASE_MSA_2050 UKTM_BASE_MSA_035 UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_2050_Int2 UKTM_LowGHG_Int2_MSA_035

Page 21: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA results

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Macro variables

280.00

300.00

320.00

340.00

360.00

380.00

400.00

420.00

2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Investment (£bn)

UKTM_BASE_MSA_2050 UKTM_BASE_MSA_035 UKTM_LowGHG_MSA_2050_Int2 UKTM_LowGHG_Int2_MSA_035

Page 22: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

UKTM-MSA issues

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

• NLP solver MINOS vs. CONOPT

• Lower bound on demand required

• Demand marginals volatility – further analysis required

Page 23: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

GTAP-UCL

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

• Based on GTAP-E production structure • GTAP8 database based on Social Accounting

Matrix and trade data • 129 regions, 57 economic sectors, 5 factors of

production • MCP formulation solved in GAMS • Currently standardised methodology of the

disaggregation of electricity sector as part of ADVANCE FP7 project

Page 24: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Conclusions and future work

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

• Comparison of capital/energy substitution in MSA vs. CGE models

• Linking UKTM with GTAP-UCL

• Application of MSA to European Times Model

• WholeSEM – link GTAP-UCL and/or UKTM-MSA with UK land-water models such as FORESEER at Cambridge

Page 25: Ongoing Macro-Stand Alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

Ongoing Macro-stand alone and CGE modelling approaches at UCL Energy Institute

IEA-ETSAP Copenhagen November 2014

Thank you for listening

[email protected]

Questions please!