offshore: groter, sneller, efficiënter
TRANSCRIPT
1
Offshore: groter, sneller,
efficiënter
10 november 2011
‘s-Hertogenbosch
Offshore W
ind Installation
Experienced, Safe, Reliable
Avans H
ogeschool 10 N
ovem
ber 2011 –
“Offshore
: gro
ter, s
nelle
r, e
ffic
iënte
r””
Jan-P
ete
r B
reedeveld
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)
Com
parison O
il &
Gas
3)
Case s
tudy
�G
reate
r G
abbard
�S
heringham
Shoal
4)
Jacket in
sta
llation
5)
Turb
ine insta
llation
6)
Substa
tion insta
llation
7)
To c
onclu
de
3
4
SHL Installation
Experienced, Safe, Reliable
�20 y
ears
of in
sta
llation e
xperience in O
il &
Gas a
nd O
ffshore
Win
d m
ark
et
�O
ver 140 p
latform
s a
nd o
ver 200 foundations insta
lled (80%
North
Sea)
�O
wn a
nd o
pera
tes m
onohull
cra
ne v
essels
Sta
nis
lav Y
udin
(2,5
00 m
T) and
Ole
g S
trashnov (5,0
00 m
T) and k
ey
insta
llation e
quip
ment, s
uch a
s p
iling
ham
mers
�E
xtensiv
e in-h
ouse e
ngin
eering e
xpertis
e a
nd e
xperienced o
ffshore
cre
w
�O
ffering lum
p-s
um
, fixe
d p
rice c
ontracts
(fu
ll w
eath
er risk taken b
y S
HL)
�D
eliv
er a s
afe
, sound, re
liable
and e
conom
ic o
ffshore
insta
llation s
olu
tion
based o
n a
n a
s-insta
lled c
ost basis
5
SHL Premises
Cyp
rus O
ffic
e L
imassol
Neth
erlands O
ffic
e Z
oete
rmeer
SHL installation equipment; perfect for
foundation and substation installation
�2,5
00 m
T revolv
ing c
apacity
�Length
183 m
/ B
readth
36 m
/ 1
40 p
ob
�2,5
00 m
2deck s
pace
�5.5
m m
inim
um
dra
ught
�A
nchors
�5,0
00 m
T revolv
ing c
apacity
�Length
183 m
/ B
readth
47 m
/ 2
20 p
ob
�4,0
00 m
2deck s
pace
�8.5
m m
inim
um
dra
ught
�A
nchors
and D
P 3
Stanislav Yudin
Oleg Strashnov
6
SHL owns all key installation equipment
�H
ydra
ulic
piling h
am
mers
�IH
C S
-500
�IH
C S
-600
�IH
C S
-900
�IH
C S
-1200
�IH
C S
-1800
�P
ile top d
rill
rig
�400 m
T levelling tools
�In
tern
al pile
lifting tools
(up to 8
4”)
�S
lings a
nd (hydra
ulic
) shackle
s
7
8
An impressive client portfolio
EGPC
9
SHL Footprint on the Globe
Solid offshore wind track record
Project
Scope
Gre
ate
r G
abbard
Foundations, S
ubsta
tions a
nd M
et M
ast
Sheringham
Shoal
Foundations a
nd S
ubsta
tions
Bork
um
West II
Tripods a
nd S
ubsta
tion
Riffg
at
Foundations a
nd S
ubsta
tion
Thanet
Substa
tion
Dan T
ysk
Substa
tion
Meerw
ind
Substa
tion
Nord
see O
st
Substa
tion
Gw
ynt y
Môr
Substa
tions
Anholt
Substa
tion
10
SHL provides safe and fast solutions for
monopile and jacket installation
Note
: “d
ura
tions”are
inclu
din
g a
.o. w
eath
er, tra
nsport, le
velli
ng, gro
uting a
nd b
reakdow
n
11
Wind Energy Potential
12
Wind Energy Potential
13
SHL to strengthen their position in the
offshore wind m
arket in cooperation
�M
arine c
ontracto
r fo
r th
e w
hole
offshore
tra
nsport a
nd insta
llation s
cope!
�O
ffer lu
mp-s
um
insta
llation c
ontracts
in the o
ffshore
win
d m
ark
et
�Fix
ed p
rice p
er in
sta
llation
�D
rives innovation a
nd im
pro
vem
ent (industria
lise / low
er costs
)
�E
nte
r in
to a
Long T
erm
Fra
mew
ork
Contract w
ith U
tilit
ies / D
evelo
pers
�Join
tly
develo
p m
ost effic
ient in
sta
llation c
oncept (e
arly
involv
em
ent)
�In
vest in
(purp
ose b
uild
) in
sta
llation e
quip
ment if required
�M
anagem
ent of oth
er vessels
/ s
erv
ices
14
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)Comparison Oil & Gas
3)
Case s
tudy
�G
reate
r G
abbard
�S
heringham
Shoal
4)
Jacket in
sta
llation
5)
Turb
ine insta
llation
6)
Substa
tion insta
llation
7)
To c
onclu
de
15
We all started the same…
Offshore locations
Offshore
oil
and g
as
Offshore
win
d
16
�N
ear shore
�M
inim
um
wate
r depth
�S
heltere
d a
reas
We all started the same….
Installation equipment
Offshore
oil
and g
as O
ffshore
win
d
1973
~1950
2010
2008
Sheerleg
Jack-u
p
17
Developments
�Further offshore
in d
eeper w
ate
rs
�H
eavie
r and larg
er structu
res
�H
igher volu
me in repetitive insta
llation
Requirements
�S
afe
, sound, re
liable
and industria
lised (in
sta
llation) solu
tion
�E
xperienced o
ffshore
(construction) cre
w
�E
quip
ment able
to w
ork
in h
ars
h o
ffshore
conditio
ns
�S
ubsta
ntial cra
ne c
apacity
(outreach a
nd lift capacity)
�E
quip
ment able
to s
tay
offshore
and take c
arg
o b
arg
e a
longsid
e (fe
eder sys
tem
)
�D
edic
ate
d (handlin
g) equip
ment (h
am
mer, lifting tools
, upendin
g tools
, …
)
…and then we m
ove further offshore
Installation requirements
North S
ea o
ffshore
conditio
ns
18
Some m
ishaps Oil & Gas
Topsid
e insta
llation w
ith S
heerleg
1966
Jack-u
p p
unch thro
ugh (exam
ple
)
19
2010
Some m
ishaps Offshore W
ind
�Various projects
�M
in. 6 m
onth
s d
ela
y due to p
oor w
ork
ability
of in
sta
llation e
quip
ment
�G
rout fa
ilure
(poor desig
n)
�Larg
e v
ariation in p
ile d
rivin
g resis
tance
�Logis
tic p
roble
ms (supply
of m
ate
rial, load o
ut, e
tc)
�…
……
.
20
From near-shore to off-shore (in Oil & Gas)
Equipment selection is key
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2011
020
40
60
80
100
120
140
Technology
Let’s c
ontinue in
Offshore
Win
d,
usin
g O
il &
Gas
experience
Distance to shore
21
From day-rate to lump-sum contracting in
Oil & Gas
�O
il and g
as s
tarted w
ith d
ay-
rate
contracts
=> m
ore
days
, m
ore
$
�V
essels
chartere
d for series o
f pla
tform
s
�The b
ill w
as p
aid
at th
e e
nd o
f th
e c
ontract by
the O
il C
om
pany
�O
il C
om
panie
s s
oon s
tarted to d
em
and for perform
ance d
riven / lum
p-s
um
contracts
�C
ontracto
rs h
ad to b
e m
ore
innovative to d
eliv
er and e
arn
their m
oney
�U
se w
eath
er sta
tistics for unders
tandin
g e
xposure
�D
evelo
p im
pro
ved insta
llation m
eth
ods a
nd (handlin
g) equip
ment
�D
evelo
p h
ydra
ulic
piling h
am
mers
vers
us s
team
ham
mers
�U
se o
f back-u
p e
quip
ment
22
From day-rate to lump-sum contracting in
Offshore wind
�P
roje
cts
will m
eet in
sta
llation s
chedule
/ d
eadlin
es
�R
isks a
re p
ut to
the p
arty
who is a
ble
to m
anage it
�In
sta
llation c
osts
are
know
n u
pfront
�no c
ost overr
uns, no p
re-investm
ents
, no loss o
f pro
ject in
com
e
�In
sta
llation in c
om
plia
nce w
ith H
SE
and M
arine W
arr
anty
Surv
eyo
r
requirem
ents
�C
ontinues innovation / im
pro
vem
ent on insta
llation
�W
ith p
roven c
oncepts
as a
sta
rtin
g p
oin
t
23
Safe
ty &
Schedule
Relia
bili
ty &
Fix
ed
Cost
Gro
ter, S
nelle
r, E
ffic
iente
r
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)
Com
parison O
il &
Gas
3)Case study
�Greater Gabbard
�Sheringham Shoal
4)
Jacket in
sta
llation
5)
Turb
ine insta
llation
6)
Substa
tion insta
llation
7)
To c
onclu
de
24
Project comparison
25
Projects
Greater Gabbard
Sheringham Shoal
Wate
r depth
m L
AT
22 - 3
214 - 2
4
MP's
by
SHL / T
ota
l#
140 / 1
40
66 / 9
0
TP's
by
SH
L / T
ota
l#
0 / 1
40
71 / 9
0
MP T
op D
iam
ete
rm
5.1
4.7
MP F
oot D
iam
ete
rm
5.5
- 6
.35.2
- 5
.7
MP L
ength
m58 - 6
844 - 6
1
MP P
enetratio
nm
28 - 3
323 - 3
7
TP H
eig
ht
m25
MP W
eig
ht
mt
510 - 6
76
375 - 5
31
TP W
eig
ht
mt
220
Curr
ent (M
ax.
)kn
3.0
2.5
Tid
ual r
ange
m H
AT-L
AT
43
Key issues
�Safety and quality -
maxi
mis
ed b
y S
HL’s
adhere
nce to industry
sta
ndard
s
�Project installation schedule -
optim
ised b
y S
HL’s
ow
n insta
llation v
essels
,
equip
ment and s
killed, exp
erienced o
ffshore
cre
w
�Project bankability -
maxi
mis
ed b
y S
HL’s
20 y
ears
offshore
insta
llation
experience a
nd s
trong b
ala
nce s
heet
�Installation budget -transpare
nt due to S
HL’s
Lum
p s
um
insta
llation
contract, inclu
din
g w
eath
er risk
�Interface risk -
min
imis
ed b
y S
HL’s
ext
ensiv
e e
xperience a
s a
n insta
llation
pro
ject m
em
ber
�Foundation and installation solution –
optim
isation e
nsure
d b
y S
HL’s
ow
n
in-h
ouse e
ngin
eering e
xpertis
e
26
Greater Gabbard offshore wind farm
�S
econd larg
est offshore
win
d farm
(504 M
W, 140 turb
ines, are
a o
f146 k
m2)
with larg
est fo
undations to d
ate
(up to: W
680 m
T / L
70 m
/ D
6.3
m)
�lo
cate
d in the N
orth S
ea,
25km
off the S
uffolk
coast
�D
evelo
ped b
y S
SE
in a
join
t ventu
re
with R
WE
npow
er re
new
able
s
�Tra
nsport a
nd insta
llation o
f 140 foundations a
nd tw
o s
ubsta
tions;
subcontracte
d b
y Flu
or Lim
ited to S
HL
�In
sta
llation s
plit
over tw
o s
easons d
ue to p
iling restric
tions
27
3.1
Case
stu
dy
–G
reate
r G
abbard
Vessel size and sufficient lift capacity improves
safety, efficiency and creates high workability
28
Robust offshore
tra
nsf
er
Ow
n p
iling h
am
mers
Excelle
nt w
ork
ability
Fast & S
afe
handlin
g
3.1
Case
stu
dy
–G
reate
r G
abbard
Greater Gabbard -Net duration
Average 16 hours / m
ono pile
Dyneema Fiber Slings
High density PE liner plates
29
3.1
Case
stu
dy
–G
reate
r G
abbard
�P
erform
ance-d
riven c
ontracts
drive innovation, safe
ty a
nd low
er costs
�N
et dura
tion (avera
ge): 1
6 h
ours
/ m
ono p
ile
�A
vera
ge p
ile d
rivin
g: 2.8
hours
�G
ross d
ura
tion (avera
ge): 0
.9 d
ay
(sum
mer)
–2.1
day
(win
ter)
/ m
ono p
ile
30
High workability created flexibility and
delivery, 8 weeks ahead of schedule
�A
ll m
ono p
iles insta
lled w
ithin
tole
rances, 8 w
eeks a
head o
f schedule
�39 m
ono p
iles insta
lled in J
uly
; 23 m
ono p
iles insta
lled in J
anuary
(W
inte
r)
�C
ontinued d
uring W
inte
r; p
ossib
le d
ue to h
igh w
ork
ability
�Fix
ed p
rice lum
p-s
um
contract pro
vid
ed fle
xibility
on s
chedule
�B
oth
substa
tions insta
lled in 8
-9 d
ays
(each)
�Topsid
es w
ere
insta
lled fully
com
mis
sio
ned a
nd teste
d
�Tra
ditio
nal substa
tion d
esig
n
(jacket &
topsid
e) in
sta
lled w
ith H
LV
to m
eet pro
ject schedule
and c
reate
flexib
ility
3.1
Case
stu
dy
–G
reate
r G
abbard
31
Sheringham Shoal
Challenging installation conditions
�317 M
W (88 turb
ines, A
rea o
f 35 k
m2)
�D
evelo
ped b
y S
cira (Join
t V
entu
re b
etw
een S
tato
il and S
tatk
raft)
�Locate
d in the G
reate
r W
ash, 17 -
23km
off the N
orfolk
coast (1
4 -
24 m
LA
T)
�C
ontract w
ith S
eaw
ay
Heavy
Lifting repla
ces the M
aste
r M
arine a
nd
MTH
øjg
aard
contract re
late
d to the rem
ain
ing s
ubsta
tions a
nd foundation
insta
llation w
ork
�Tra
nsport a
nd insta
llation o
f (r
em
ain
ing)
�66 m
ono p
iles
(up to 5
30m
T / 6
1 x
5.7
m)
�71 tra
nsitio
n p
ieces
(220m
T / 6
1 x
5.0
m)
�tw
o s
ubsta
tions
(each 1
,000 m
T)
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Inshore transfer (M
ono Piles)
32
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Inshore transfer (Transition Pieces)
33
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Deck layout (1)
34
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Deck layout (2)
35
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Deck layout (3)
36
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Deck layout (4)
37
Courtesy
of Sta
toil
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
38
Pile upending (Lifting tool)
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Pile driving
39
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Pile verticality m
easurement systems
40
Along pile wall (Mini tilt)
Top of pile
Top of hammer sleeve (Octans)
Side of hammer sleeve (Cilinders)
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Transition Piece Installation
41
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
42
Sheringham Shoal; installation completed
3 weeks ahead of schedule
�M
aid
en p
roje
ct fo
r H
LV
Ole
g S
trashnov
�Tra
nsport o
f fo
undations fro
m F
lushin
g
to o
ffshore
location o
n H
LV
deck
�B
oth
substa
tions topsid
es s
uccessfu
lly
insta
lled in 2
days
(M
ay
2011)
�Foundation insta
llation (M
ono p
ile +
TP
)
(tra
nsport, le
velling, gro
uting inclu
ded)
�M
ay
2011:
15
�June 2
011:
20
�July
2011:
16
�A
ugust 2011:
15 (
finis
hed 2
1-0
8-2
011)
�A
vera
ge
1.7
day
/ fo
undation
Courtesy
of Sta
toil
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
43
Sheringham Shoal-Net duration
�N
et dura
tion (avera
ge): 1
8 h
ours
/ foundation
�A
vera
ge p
ile d
rivin
g: 2.2
hours
�G
ross d
ura
tion (avera
ge): 1
.7 d
ay
/ fo
undation
3.2
Case
stu
dy
–Sheringham
Shoal
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)
Com
parison O
il &
Gas
3)
Case s
tudy
�G
reate
r G
abbard
�S
heringham
Shoal
4)Jacket installation
5)
Turb
ine insta
llation
6)
Substa
tion insta
llation
7)
To c
onclu
de
44
Jacket Installation –Noise M
itigation
45
�A
llow
able
subsea n
ois
e levels
160dB
at 750m
dis
tance
�P
ile d
rivin
g h
am
mers
pro
duce >
166dB
at th
is d
ista
nce
�N
ois
e m
itig
ation required.
�A
ir b
ubble
scre
ens
�S
ingle
or double
wall
sile
ncer in
com
bin
ation w
ith a
ir b
ubble
s
Pic
ture
courtesy
of IH
C H
ydro
ham
mer
�P
ost piling p
rovid
es c
halle
nges for nois
e m
itig
ation a
nd insta
llation a
ccele
ration
Jacket installation + Post piling
46
�U
se a
tem
pla
te, com
bin
ed w
ith a
vib
rato
ry a
nd im
pact ham
mer
Jacket installation + Pre piling
47
48
Jacket installation + Pre piling
Tripods and Piles on HLV
49
Jacket installation + Pre piling
Use of Silencer Frame
50
Jacket installation + Pre piling
Installation of Piles
51
Jacket installation + Pre piling
Installation of Piles
Jacket installation + Pre piling
Install Tripods onto Piles
52
Jacket installation + Pre piling
Deck Layout
53
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)
Com
parison O
il &
Gas
3)
Case s
tudy
�G
reate
r G
abbard
�S
heringham
Shoal
4)
Jacket in
sta
llation
5)Turbine installation
6)
Substa
tion insta
llation
7)
To c
onclu
de
54
Current way of turbine installation is not
the way forw
ard
55
Current way of turbine installation is not
the way forw
ard
56
�C
urr
ently
turb
ines a
re m
ain
ly insta
lled w
ith jack-u
p v
essels
�C
urr
ently
turb
ines a
re m
ain
ly insta
lled o
ffshore
in 5
-6 lifts
�C
urr
ent tu
rbin
e insta
llation d
ura
tions e
xceed 1
week o
r m
ore
�Futu
re p
roje
cts
are
further offshore
in d
eeper w
ate
rs in e
ven m
ore
challe
ngin
g s
oil
and w
eath
er conditio
ns
�Futu
re p
roje
cts
ask for at le
ast 1 turb
ine insta
llation / d
ay
(/pro
ject)
�C
urr
ent in
sta
llation m
eth
od n
eed to c
hange i.e
. to
deal w
ith these
requirem
ents
�In
sta
llation n
eed to b
e inclu
ded in the turb
ine d
esig
n; th
is m
ight re
quire s
light
changes/a
dditio
nal in
sta
llation a
ids
Turbine installation
57
Turbine installation
58
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)
Com
parison O
il &
Gas
3)
Case s
tudy
�G
reate
r G
abbard
�S
heringham
Shoal
4)
Jacket in
sta
llation
5)
Turb
ine insta
llation
6)Substation installation
7)
To c
onclu
de
59
Traditional jacket topside design provides
maxim
um flexibility and m
inim
um risks
60
Index
1)
Introduction S
HL
2)
Com
parison O
il &
Gas
3)
Case s
tudy
�G
reate
r G
abbard
�S
heringham
Shoal
4)
Jacket in
sta
llation
5)
Turb
ine insta
llation
6)
Substa
tion insta
llation
7)To conclude
61
Summary and conclusions
�A
pply
the lessons learn
ed fro
m O
il &
Gas in O
ffshore
Win
d
�E
quip
ment sele
ction is k
ey;
not ju
st sele
ct equip
ment because itis
availa
ble
�W
ork
ability
of m
arine s
pre
ad is a
key
issue in d
evelo
pin
g o
ffshore
win
dfa
rms
�W
ind turb
ine s
hall
be (re
-)desig
ned takin
g into
account offshore
insta
llation
meth
ods
�D
evelo
p innovative (te
chnic
al) s
olu
tions to d
ecre
ase insta
llation tim
e, m
itig
ate
subsea n
ois
e levels
and m
inim
ise (w
eath
er)
dela
ys
62
Fib
er Slin
gs
(Gre
ate
r G
abbard
)
Offshore
Win
d Insta
llation:
“gro
ter, s
nelle
r, e
ffic
iënte
r”…
…
….a
n industry c
halle
nge !!
63
Thank you for your attention!
28/1
1/2
011
64
65
Offshore: groter, sneller,
efficiënter
10 november 2011
‘s-Hertogenbosch