office of the commissioner for public employment care and protection of children act clearance...
TRANSCRIPT
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
CARE AND PROTECTION OF
CHILDREN ACT
Clearance Notices
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
• All people engaged in child related employment to hold a clearance notice
• Advice on identifying the positions and employees who may be engaged in child related employment was circulated some months ago. Contact Lisa Hill in OCPE for details
• SafeNT is responsible for clearance notices• Clearance notices required from September 2010• SafeNT processing applications from February 2010• Communication campaign in March 2010• Issues still around payment and record keeping.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE ACT
(WHISTLEBLOWERS)
Investigations under PSEMA
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
• PIDA covers matters that would usually be investigated under the discipline provisions of PSEMA
• Legal advice sought to clarify how this is resolved. Advice:
• Not every communication to a CEO revealing ‘improper conduct’ is a ‘disclosure’
• Has to be either made in express reliance upon the PIDA or, if it is plain that the person is acting in the capacity of a “whistleblower” as term generally understood
Commissioner for Public
Interest Disclosures (CPID)
Commissioner for Public Employment (CPE)
Additional function under s14 of PSEMA
CPE may investigate using powers under s13(p) and s15 of PSEMA
OR pass on to Agency CE
Agency Chief ExecutiveThe matter ceases to be investigated under PIDA
(although the discloser retains the protections of PIDA)
Disclosure made under the Public Interest Disclosures Act
Intersection of PIDA and PSEMA and Disclosure of Confidential Information
CPID investigates under PIDA
The CPID may authorise the disclosure of confidential information in order to facilitate the investigation of a public interest disclosure. S/he
may only authorise the disclosure of “identifying information” if it is
relevant and necessary for effective investigation.
This should be considered on a case by case basis and be subject to
discussion between the CPID, CPE and the responsible CE.
The CPID may seek the assistance of staff from the relevant Agency to
assist in the investigation. The matter remains a Public
Interest Disclosure.
S13(p) of PSEMA allows for the imposition of functions on the CPE.
S14(1) of PSEMA allows the Commissioner to do all things
necessary or convenient to be done for or in connection with or incidental
to the performance of his or her functions and the exercising of his
or her powers.S15 provides for special powers of
the CPE.
Part 8 of PSEMA provides for Chief Executive action where a breach of
discipline is suspected.
** This flowchart shows the pathway of addressing a PIDA disclosure in the event that the CPID considers a disclosure, after consultation with the CPE and relevant CE, is properly dealt with under PSEMA.
CE investigates under Part 8
of PSEMA
CPID refers the matter to the CPE under
s22 of PIDA
Insert title of presentation here
Representation of Equal Opportunity Groups in the NTPS
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
Category June June June June June June June June
Seven-year change2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Indigenous Australians 4.6% 5.0% 5.7% 6.6% 6.9% 7.3% 7.7% 8.1% 3.5% pts.
People with disability 1.4% 1.3% 1.7% 1.8% 2.1% 1.9% 2.0% 1.8% 0.4% pts.
People from culturally diverse background
2.2% 2.3% 3.6% 4.1% 4.9% 4.7% 4.2% 4.0% 1.8% pts.
Women in executive management(EO1 to ECO6)
26% 26% 27% 31% 32% 34% 37% 40% 14% pts.
Insert title of presentation here
Movements in NT Population and NTPS Staff 1983–2009
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
NTPS Population
Insert title of presentation here
Employment Status of NTPS Staff 1998–2009
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
STATUS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Change 99 to 09
Permanent 78.0% 76.9% 77.6% 78.1% 78.3% 77.0% 75.5% 75.6% 74.0% 72.3% 70.9% -7.1% pts.
Temporary 19.3% 20.0% 19.5% 18.9% 18.7% 19.6% 21.3% 21.3% 22.1% 23.7% 24.9% 5.6% pts.
Casual 2.5% 2.9% 2.8% 2.8% 2.8% 3.3% 3.2% 3.0% 3.6% 3.7% 4.0% 1.5% pts.
Misc. 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% pts.
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Insert title of presentation here
Part-time in the NTPS 1999–2009
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
STATUS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Change '99 to '09
Part-time staff 8.4% 9.4% 10.0% 10.7% 11.3% 11.3% 11.4% 11.5% 12.1% 12.2% 12.8% 4.4% pts.
Insert title of presentation here
Average Age by Gender NTPS Staff 1994–2009
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Av
era
ge
Ag
e
Males
Overall
Females
Insert title of presentation here
Length of Service by Gender NTPS Staff – 2009
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Length of Service (years)
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
Ge
nd
er
Female
Male
Insert title of presentation here
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
<=20
>20- 25
>25- 30
>30- 35
>35- 40
>40- 45
>45- 50
>50- 55
>55- 60
>60- 65
>65-70
>70- 75
>75- 80
>80- 85
>85- 90
> 90
Length of Service (years)
% o
f G
en
der Females
Males
Trend Females
Trend Males
Distribution of Men and Women in the NTPS by Salary Level - June 2009
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
<= 20 >20 -25
>25 -30
>30 -35
>35 -40
>40 -45
>45 -50
>50 -55
>55 -60
> 60
Length of Service (years)
% o
f G
en
der
Females
Males
Trend Females
Trend Males
Distribution of Men and Women in the NTPS by Salary Level - June 1995
HR Forum December 2009
NTPS Separation and Recruitment Rates by Employment Category: 2003–04 to 2008–09 Permanent Staff
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment rate
%
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
Administrative 8 5 8 4 9 3 9 4 10 4 7 4
Professional 11 7 10 8 15 8 12 8 13 7 11 8
Technical 11 6 9 7 10 7 10 8 13 8 9 7
Physical 11 7 12 7 13 10 12 6 10 8 9 9
Teaching 12 9 14 3 10 1 8 0 7 0 8 0
Health Workers 14 9 11 11 15 8 13 6 11 7 11 9
Uniformed 7 12 7 10 8 8 8 9 9 8 7 11
TOTAL 10 7 10 6 11 5 10 5 10 5 8 5
HR Forum December 2009
NTPS Separation and Recruitment Rates by Employment Category: 2003–04 to 2008–09 Permanent & Temporary Staff
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment rate
%
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
separation
rate %
recruitment
rate %
Administrative 25 32 27 32 27 26 27 30 27 31 25 26
Professional 26 28 26 26 29 28 24 28 29 31 25 30
Technical 18 19 18 20 19 19 20 22 22 23 17 24
Physical 27 29 30 33 29 34 29 32 30 35 25 37
Teaching 20 25 26 23 23 24 24 24 25 29 24 28
Health Workers 53 58 48 59 49 48 44 47 42 47 38 48
Uniformed 8 14 7 13 8 12 8 11 10 9 8 11
Total 26 31 27 31 27 28 26 28 27 31 24 29