of september 27, 2021 and october 27, 2021 orders re

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00114910-3 Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST

REPLY ISO CCPOA’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ORDERS RE: MANDATORY VACCINATIONS

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Gregg McLean Adam, Bar No. 203436 [email protected] Matthew Taylor, Bar No. 264551 [email protected] MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP 235 Montgomery St., Suite 828 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.266.1800 Facsimile: 415.266.1128 David A. Sanders, Bar No. 221393 [email protected] Daniel M. Lindsay, Bar No. 142895 [email protected] CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION 755 Riverpoint Drive, Suite 200 West Sacramento, CA 95605-1634 Telephone: 916.340.2959 Facsimile: 916.374.1824 Attorneys for Intervenor CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCIANO PLATA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,

Defendants. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION,

Intervenor.

Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR STAY OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 AND OCTOBER 27, 2021 ORDERS RE: MANDATORY VACCINATIONS Date: November 17, 2021 Time: 2 pm. Crtrm.: 6 – 2nd Floor The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

Case 4:01-cv-01351-JST Document 3743 Filed 11/11/21 of 12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

00114910-3 i Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST REPLY ISO CCPOA’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ORDERS RE: MANDATORY VACCINATIONS

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1

II. ARGUMENT .........................................................................................................................2

A. The Union Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Its Appeal .....................................2

1. The State Has Not Acted with Deliberate Indifference. .................................3

2. The Mandatory Vaccination Order Fails the Least Intrusive Means Test .................................................................................................................6

B. The Union and Its Members Will Suffer Irreparable Harm Absent a Stay ................8

C. The Issuance of a Stay Will Not Substantially Harm the Incarcerated Population, and a Stay Is in the Public Interest ..........................................................9

III. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................................10


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00114910-3 1 Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST REPLY ISO CCPOA’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ORDERS RE: MANDATORY VACCINATIONS

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

I.

INTRODUCTION

The Court’s orders mandating the vaccination of all staff in California Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) prisons are extraordinary. Never before has a court

ordered more than tens of thousands of people to submit to an invasive medical procedure to cure

an alleged constitutional deficiency in the prisons. The impact of the Court’s orders is imminent

and irreparable. CDCR staff including the members of the California Correctional Peace Officers’

Association (CCPOA or Union) will be forced either to set aside their right to refuse medical

treatment or face an uncertain future under threat of discipline, which will likely include weeks or

months without pay and potential loss of their jobs.

Since the Court’s orders, the Ninth Circuit has clarified how courts should evaluate

challenges to COVID-19 remedial measures in prisons, see Fraihat v. U.S. Immigration and

Customs Enforcement, No. 20-55634, --- F.4th ---, 2021 WL 4890884 (9th Cir. Oct. 20, 2021),

and now the Fifth Circuit has weighed in as well, see BST Holdings v. O.S.H.A., No. 21-60845,

ECF No. 00516083925, at 2 (5th Cir. Nov. 6, 2021). Neither result comports with the Court’s

orders.

Still intent on defending the immediate implementation of the mandatory vaccination

orders, however, the Receiver and Plaintiffs cobble together reasons why the Court should not

allow the Ninth Circuit to timely review this issue of first impression and grant the requested stay.

None convinces.

First, the Receiver and Plaintiffs overplay their contention that the Union delayed in

moving to stay the court’s order. They ignore the fact that the September 27, 2021 Order re:

Mandatory Vaccinations did not have an implementation deadline. Once it became clear that the

court would set such a deadline, the Union moved to stay. The Union filed its motion within two

hours after the Court set the deadline. This hardly constitutes a “substantial” period of delay that

undercuts the Union’s claim of irreparable harm as the Receiver alleges. ECF No. 3738

[Receiver’s Opposition to Defendants’ and CCPOA’s Motions to Stay] at fn. 3.

Second, the Receiver and Plaintiffs argue that the irreparable harm will not come to pass


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

because Union members will ultimately decide to submit themselves to vaccination instead of

losing their jobs, and the harm to Union members who refuse vaccination is easily remedied. The

Receiver and Plaintiffs miss the mark. Union members’ rights are violated when they reluctantly

relinquish their right to refuse medical treatment. The Receiver and Plaintiffs’ argument that harm

to Union members who refuse vaccination is easily remedied is confusing at best, and disdainful at

worst.

Third, the Receiver and Plaintiffs attempt to distinguish Fraihat as inapplicable pre-

vaccination case law, but no court bar this one has found such a bright line between cases

addressing COVID-19 remedial measures pre- and post-vaccination. The Receiver and Plaintiffs

offer no authority for disregarding cases assessing prison administrators’ past attempts to provide

for the health and safety of prisoners. There is none.

II.

ARGUMENT

The standard for granting a stay pending appeal is not in dispute. See ECF No. 3715-1

[Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants’ Motion to Stay Order Re

Mandatory Vaccinations Pending Appeal] at 9; ECF No. 3722 [CCPOA’s Motion for Stay of

September 27, 2021 Order Re Mandatory Vaccinations] at 5-6; ECF No. 3738 at 8; and ECF No.

3739 [Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ and CCPOA’s Motions to Stay This Court’s

September 27, 2021 and October 27,2021 Orders] at 6. The Union has established a “substantial

case” or a “strong showing” for relief on the merits, as the Union’s members will be irreparably

injured absent a stay, and the balance of the equities and public interest favor granting a stay. See

ECF No. 3722 [Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Union’s Motion for Stay]

(Opening Brief) at 5-6.

A. The Union Is Likely to Succeed on the Merits of Its Appeal

No party disputes that the Court only has authority to order the mandatory vaccination of

all CDCR staff if the Receiver and Plaintiffs meet their burden to show that (a) failing to issue

such an order violates the Eighth Amendment rights of prisoners and (b) the order is “is narrowly

drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the [Eighth Amendment violation], and is the


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the [Eighth Amendment].” 18 USC

§ 3626(a). The Union has demonstrated that the Receiver and Plaintiffs can make no such

showing.

1. The State Has Not Acted with Deliberate Indifference.

In its Opening Brief, the Union directed the Court to the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Fraihat

that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) did not act “with deliberate indifference to

medical needs or in reckless disregard of health risks” where it undertook COVID-19 intervention

measures similar to those that the State implemented in this case. ECF 3722 at 6-10 (quoting

Fraihat, 2021 WL 4890884, at *20). The Union argued that Fraihat reveals at least five errors in

the Court’s Order re: Mandatory Vaccination, including that (a) the State’s reasonable measures to

combat COVID-19 preclude a finding of deliberate indifference, (b) the State has not acted

unreasonably simply because additional measures might be advisable, (c) the existence of a new

measure (i.e., a vaccine) does not mean that the measure must be mandatory for all staff,

especially when the State has made the measure widely available to staff and prisoners through its

voluntary vaccination program, (d) the evidence presented by the Receiver and Plaintiffs does not

justify the system-wide relief they seek, and (e) the Supreme Court’s command to consider

“current attitudes and conduct” does not support the Court’s emphasis on mandatory vaccination

of all staff relative to all other measures.

Since the Union filed its Opening Brief, courts have continued to evaluate the legal

propriety of vaccine mandates. On November 6, 2021, the Fifth Circuit stayed an Occupational

Health and Safety Administration (“OSHA”) COVID-19 vaccination mandate. BST Holdings,

ECF No. 00516083925, at 2.

Faced with the overwhelming likelihood that the Ninth Circuit will side with the Union

and Defendants, the Receiver and Plaintiffs grasp at straws:

First, the Receiver and Plaintiffs attempt to distinguish Fraihat as inapplicable to the

current stage of the pandemic in which vaccines are available, ECF No. 3738 at 14-15; ECF No.

3739 at 17, but as discussed in the Union’s Opening Brief, Fraihat does not mandate that the State

take any particular intervention measures in response to COVID-19. ECF No. 3722 at 9. The


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Receiver also argues that the deliberate indifference standard clarified in Fraihat does not apply

with equal force here because the California prison system is in receivership. ECF No. 3738 at

14-15. The Receiver cites no authority to support the dubious proposition that constitutional

violations that occurred years earlier, with respect to unrelated issues, support a finding that a

prison administrator’s response to a once-in-a-century pandemic is deliberately indifferent.

Second, the Receiver and Plaintiffs argue that the State must implement the most effective

intervention measure, ECF No. 3738 at 5-6; ECF No. 3739 at 17, which they both incorrectly

assert is the mandatory vaccination of staff (sidestepping the mandatory vaccination of prisoners),

but Fraihat requires no such thing.

Third, the Receiver also argues that by implementing a mandatory vaccination policy for

some staff, the State has somehow admitted that its pre-vaccination COVID-19 intervention

measures were constitutionally inadequate. ECF 3738 at 14. But the Court already found those

measures constitutionally sufficient. See ECF No. 3291 [April 17, 2020 Order Denying Plaintiffs’

Emergency Motion Regarding Prevention and Management of COVID-19] at 14:3-4 (“In this

case, … the Court concludes without difficulty that Defendants’ response has been reasonable”);

Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 845 (where prison officials act reasonably, they do not violate

the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause). And the Receiver has the

deliberate indifference standard backwards. A prison administrator is deliberately indifferent

when it acts in “reckless disregard of known health risks,” Fraihat, 2021 WL 4890884, at *1, not

when it requires that some of its staff be vaccinated and provides vaccinations to other willing

staff and prisoners.

Fourth, the Receiver overlooks important factors that convinced the Court in Jones v. City

& County of San Francisco, 976 F. Supp. 896, 908 (N.D. Cal. 1997) that the city did not act

reasonably to ensure inmates’ safety. Though the city made “commendable improvements” to

address fire hazards, these paled in comparison to the extent of the remaining deficiencies in fire

safety protocol, which were rampant and were left unaddressed for a long period of time. See

Jones, supra, 976 F. Supp. at 908. Of the 24 serious deficiencies that were identified, the Court

listed only four that were addressed by the City. It also noted that at least 6 serious deficiencies


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

remained, including the use of flammable mattresses “[among] the greatest fire hazards that exist

in correctional settings.” Id. Thus, the Court assessed the city’s cumulative actions in that case—

rather than its decision with respect to a single safety measure—to determine whether its actions

were reasonable. It should also not be lost on the Court that none of the safety measures not taken,

e.g., installing automatic sprinklers, installing fire-rated door assemblies, etc., see id., involved an

encroachment on the rights of the prison staff.

Fifth, the Receiver inaccurately describes the Ninth Circuit’s analysis in Wilk v. Neven,

956 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2020), and thereby disregards how it is distinguishable from the present

issue. The Receiver describes the analysis in Wilk as an assessment of “whether there was an

action it would be unreasonable [for defendants] not to take” (emphasis added), suggesting that

defendants’ cumulative response to the pandemic is nullified if it fails to take even one step to

enhance inmate safety. Yet, the Ninth Circuit did not discuss any positive steps that the Wilk

defendants took to protect the plaintiff from his aggressor; thus, there was no finding of liability

on the part of the defendants despite other measures they implemented to ensure inmate safety.

The same is true with respect to the Ninth Circuit’s review of other cases in the Wilk decision.

There was no indication that the defendants in those cases took some remedial measures but

neglected to take an additional step. The Receiver also ignores that the facts in Wilk involved

exclusively violence by one inmate against another and how the plaintiff’s evidence showed that

the prison staff “actively misled Wilk” by telling him that his aggressor remained segregated from

the population when he was not, which thereby reduced Wilk’s own ability to protect himself.

Wilk, supra, 956 F.3d at 1150. Similar to Jones, this case did not involve the consideration of any

measures that would require prison staff to make a sacrifice regarding their personal convictions,

bodily autonomy or their economic well-being.

Sixth, Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 does little to support Receiver’s argument. As the

Receiver points out, the Farmer decision raises the concept of “reasonable safety,” yet provides

little by way of analysis to explain what the term means. The Supreme Court’s focus in the

opinion is primarily on the level of subjective intent and knowledge that is necessary to establish

liability and practically avoids discussing where the line should be drawn between reasonable and


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

unreasonable level of safety. Therefore, like in the Wilk case, there is no assessment of the steps

that the prison did take to protect the plaintiff prisoners safety versus what it did not do. The

Supreme Court did make one thing clear, though. “[P]rison officials who actually knew of a

substantial risk to inmate health or safety may be found free from liability if they responded

reasonably to the risk, even if the harm ultimately was not averted.” (Emphasis added.) Farmer,

supra, 511 U.S. at 844.

2. The Mandatory Vaccination Order Fails the Least Intrusive Means Test

As the Union established in its Opening Brief, the Court erred in finding that the

mandatory vaccination of all staff was the least intrusive means of remedying an alleged Eighth

Amendment violation when mandatory prisoner vaccination is less intrusive and more efficient at

protecting prisoners from COVID-19. ECF 3722 at 10. The Union also argued that the State’s

voluntary staff vaccination program is becoming more successful each day. Id. citing ECF No.

3715-2 [Declaration of Diana Toche, DDS In Support of Defendants’ Motion to Stay] at ¶ 3

(number of staff who have received at least one dose of vaccine increased from about fifty-three

percent on August 6, 2021, to about sixty-three percent by October 14, 2021, and the vaccination

rates among custody staff have increased from about forty-one percent to fifty-one percent in the

same period.) And the staff vaccination rate has continued to increase since the Union filed its

Opening Brief. See ECF No. 3739-1 [Declaration of Laura Bixby in Support of Plaintiffs’

Opposition to Defendants’ and CCPOA’s Motions to Stay Vaccine Mandate Orders] at 10.

The Receiver and Plaintiffs’ arguments fail to address these points adequately.

First, the Receiver and Plaintiffs confusingly argue that the increase in staff vaccination

rates show that mandatory vaccination is necessary because the increase is due to the mandatory

vaccination of some staff. (ECF No. 3738 at 16; ECF No. 3739 at 19.) But the Receiver provides

no evidence that the increase is exclusively, or even primarily, among staff required to be

vaccinated. Furthermore, a comparison between the rates of increase in staff vaccinations before

and after the Department of Public Health’s August 19 vaccination order shows a slightly higher

rate before the order was issued. The average increase in vaccinations (at least one dose given)

among institutional staff, measured every month from January to July 2021, was 3.8%. (See ECF


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

No. 3530 [Joint Case Management Conference Statement (CMC Statement) filed on January 13,

2021] at 2; ECF No. 3548 [CMC Statement filed on February 12, 2021] at 2; ECF No. 3566 [CMC

Statement filed on March 24, 2021] at 4; ECF No. 3579 [CMC Statement filed on April 27, 2021]

at 3; ECF No. 3592 [CMC Statement filed on May 25, 2021] at 3; ECF No. 3605 [CMC Statement

filed on June 25, 2021] at 2; ECF No. 3623 [CMC Statement filed on July 27, 2021] at 2.) Within

this period, some monthly increases were as high as 5% and 9%. Comparatively, the average

increase since the order, from mid-September to mid-October, is 3.6% with the highest increase

being 5% from September to October. (See Declaration of Gregg McLean Adam In Support of

Reply Brief at ¶¶ 2 - 4, Exhs. A - C.)

Second, the Receiver argues that the mandatory vaccination of prisoners would not address

the substantial risk posed by COVID-19 because of the possibility of breakthrough infections,

ECF No. 3738 at 17, but the existence of breakthrough infections cannot simultaneously

undermine the importance of prisoner vaccinations and support the need to vaccinate all staff.

Breakthrough infections will occur regardless of who is vaccinated. The Receiver ignores that

prisoners, the population the Eighth Amendment was meant to protect, are far more likely to be

infected with COVID-19 if they are unvaccinated than if they are vaccinated and suffer a

breakthrough infection.

Third, the Receiver unconvincingly argues that the mandatory vaccination of prisoners, as

compared to the mandatory vaccination of staff, would not be a less intrusive means to protect the

incarcerated population by twisting the words of Dr. James Watt, who previously declared that

“‘[t]he best way for patients in correctional settings to reduce their risk of severe illness … would

be to get vaccinated.’” ECF No. 3738 at 17 (quoting ECF No. 3661 [Declaration of James Watt,

MD, MPH] at 6 - 7) (emphasis in original). The Receiver makes the case that though inoculation

may be the best way for patients to protect themselves, it is not the best way for Defendants to

protect the patients—that would take mandatory vaccinations of both staff and patients. But this

ignores the point that Defendants do not have to implement the best level of protection; they need

only provide reasonable measures. Mandatory vaccinations of patients would be a reasonable

remedial measure. It would also be a less intrusive means than requiring staff to vaccinate given


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

that the purpose of the remedial measures is to protect the patients themselves.

B. The Union and Its Members Will Suffer Irreparable Harm Absent a Stay

In its Opening Brief, the Union discussed the numerous irreparable harms that its members

would suffer if the Court’s orders were not stayed, including being forced to choose between

losing their employment and subjecting themselves to an invasive and unwanted medical

procedure, financial harm, social upheaval, long-lasting prison staff shortages, the loss of staff

benefits, increased staff workload, and serious security risks in prisons among others. The

Plaintiffs and the Receiver’s arguments in opposition fail to counter these points.

First, the Receiver implies that these harms are manufactured because the Union did not

argue irreparable harm to staff in response to the Order to Show Cause and did not move to stay

until almost a month after the Court’s initial Order re: Mandatory Vaccinations. ECF 3738 at 20.

The Receiver ignores that irreparable harm is not a prerequisite to the Court’s authority to act

under the Prison Litigation Reform Act and that the Union moved to stay within hours of the

Court setting an implementation deadline for its order.

Second, the Receiver and Plaintiffs argue that the irreparable harm that Union members

will suffer is not cognizable because it is purely financial or can be remedied, and in any case,

vaccinations are beneficial. (ECF No. 3738 at 24-25; ECF No. 3739 at 13-14.). The Receiver and

Plaintiffs completely miss the point. Union members have a right to refuse medical treatment,

whether or not that medical treatment is ultimately beneficial to them. See, e.g., Cruzan v. Dir.,

Mo. Dep't of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 271 (1990). That right is violated when they are forced to

undergo unwanted treatment. And the harm caused by the violation of that right cannot be

reversed post-vaccination because it is the needle entering the arm that causes the irreparable

harm.

Union members who refuse to be vaccinated and lose their jobs are also harmed. Those

members will either resign or be subject to discipline. If they resign, they would likely lose their

right to mandatory reinstatement. Cal. Gov. Code § 19140. If they refuse to resign, they will be

subjected to discipline, as the Plaintiffs detail in their opposition brief. ECF No. 3739 at 8-10.

Disciplinary records affect employees’ ability to be promoted and to succeed in their careers. It


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

can also lead to termination, which results in numerous hardships that the Union previously

detailed in its Opening Brief, ECF No. 3722 at 10-13, and a possible bar from future state

employment, Cal. Gov. Code § 19583.1. Even if Union members are successful in the

disciplinary proceedings and granted back pay, undergoing weeks or months without pay is not

something the average Union member can bear.

Third, Plaintiffs argue that irreparable harm is unlikely to occur because Union members

will choose to be vaccinated when faced with mandatory vaccination or the loss of their jobs and

that a stay is premature because unvaccinated Union members will not face progressive discipline

until after the mandatory vaccination deadline. ECF No. 3739 at 7-10. But, once again, Plaintiffs

ignore the hardships endured by Union members who reluctantly submit to a violation of their

right to refuse medical treatment, or endure a long period without pay, or at reduced pay, while

challenging the progressive discipline process, or suffer the loss of their jobs. These hardships

may not mean much to lawyers but for working families, they are simply not a viable option.

Fourth, Plaintiffs and the Receiver argue that staff shortages are unlikely because staff

will choose to be vaccinated once they face the decision of being vaccinated or losing their jobs.

(ECF No. 3738 at 21-23, 25.) Once again, this argument assumes away the irreparable harm to

Union members.

C. The Issuance of a Stay Will Not Substantially Harm the Incarcerated Population, and

a Stay Is in the Public Interest

In its Opening Brief, the Union showed how the State’s multiple measures to lower

prisoners’ risk of COVID-19 infection, including a voluntary vaccination program for prisoners

and staff, have resulted in a relatively low rate of COVID-19 in California prisons. Thus, any

added benefit from the mandatory vaccination of all staff is likely to be incremental and does not

outweigh the irreparable harm caused to the Union’s members. Once again, the Receiver and

Plaintiffs argue that mandatory staff vaccination is the best means for limiting the substantial risk

of COVID-19 in prisons (ECF No. 3738 at 27), and once again, the Receiver and Plaintiffs ignore

the harm caused to staff and effectiveness of mandatory prisoner vaccination.


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28


MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

III.

CONCLUSION

The Union respectfully requests that the Court stay its September 27, 2021 Mandatory

Vaccination Order and October 27, 2021 Order Setting Deadline for Mandatory Vaccination

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d) pending the Union’s appeal.

Dated: November 11, 2021 MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP

By

Gregg McLean Adam

Matthew Taylor

Attorneys for Intervenor

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE

OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00115052-1

1 Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST

DEC. GREGG ADAM ISO REPLY ISO CCPOA’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ORDERS

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Gregg McLean Adam, Bar No. 203436 [email protected] Matthew Taylor, Bar No. 264551 [email protected] MESSING ADAM & JASMINE LLP 235 Montgomery St., Suite 828 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.266.1800 Facsimile: 415.266.1128 David A. Sanders, Bar No. 221393 [email protected] Daniel M. Lindsay, Bar No. 142895 [email protected] CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION 755 Riverpoint Drive, Suite 200 West Sacramento, CA 95605-1634 Telephone: 916.340.2959 Facsimile: 916.374.1824 Attorneys for Intervenor CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCIANO PLATA, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,

Defendants. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION,

Intervenor.

Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST DECLARATION OF GREGG McLEAN ADAM IN SUPPORT OF REPLY IN SUPPORT OF CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS’ ASSOCIATION’S MOTION FOR STAY OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2021 AND OCTOBER 27, 2021 ORDERS RE: MANDATORY VACCINATIONS Date: November 17, 2021 Time: 2 pm. Crtrm.: 6 – 2nd Floor The Hon. Jon S. Tigar

I, Gregg McLean Adam, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court. I am a partner with

Messing Adam & Jasmine LLP, attorneys of record for Intervenor California Correctional Peace

Case 4:01-cv-01351-JST Document 3743-1 Filed 11/11/21 Page 1 of 19

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

00115052-1

2 Case No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST

DEC. GREGG ADAM ISO REPLY ISO CCPOA’S MOTION FOR STAY OF ORDERS

MESSING ADAM &

JASMINE LLP

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Officers’ Association (CCPOA). I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein, and if

called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto. I make this declaration in

support of CCPOA’s Reply in Support of California Correctional Peace Officers’ Association’s

Motion for Stay of September 27, 2021 and October 27, 2021 Orders Re: Mandatory

Vaccinations.

2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an email dated

September 21, 2021 that I received from Miranda Taylor, Assistant to Director of Health Care

Services Joseph Bick, M.D., at California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, subject

line “COVID Data Summary for 09-17-21 (External Stakeholders).”

3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of an email dated October

15, 2021 that I received from Miranda Taylor, Assistant to Director of Health Care Services

Joseph Bick, M.D., at California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, subject line

“COVID Data Summary for 10-15-21 (External Stakeholders).”

4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of an email dated November

5, 2021 that I received from Miranda Taylor, Assistant to Director of Health Care Services Joseph

Bick, M.D., at California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, subject line “COVID

Data Summary for 11-05-21 (External Stakeholders).”

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this 11th day of November, 2021, at Mill Valley, California.

Gregg McLean Adam


Exhibit A


!

%764 " DHRUW# > PWHTKH. > PWHTKH%DHRUW0 JKJW%JH%N U[/

).59" DZ LXKH# CLVYLS ILW('# (& (' ),(& A>

*6" 1%?UWWPX- 1RPXUT8HWK^- 2HWWU\ # BUXJUL0 343B- 2LTY_# > LRPXXH0 343B- 2PJQ # 4W%

;UXLVO0 343B- 3RHWQ < LRXU !JQ LRXU0 A139693%54E "- 4HS UT> J3RHPT- 4H[PK CHTKLWX-

4H[PX# DHS P H0 343B- 4UTCVLJYLW- 5K C\ HTXUT- 5WTLXY 7 HR[HT- 6LWN Z XUT#

AHYWPJPH0 343B- 6UXX# DHS S ^0 343B- 7 WLN N 1KHS - 8LPTY_# =PXH0 343B- 9WHS 8HXHT-

;HS PL 4Z VWLL- ;UOTXUT# 7 HTTUT0 343B- < LRXU# 3RHWQ 0 343B- < PWQ RHTK# BPJOHWK0 343B-

< ^RL =L\ PX- =HZ WH2P]I^- =PXH5RRX- > HWYPT4UKK - > HYY =UVLX- > PJOHLR2PLT- ?LPRR#

;LTTPMLW0 343B- @XYRPTN # =PTKH- AHZ R> LRRU- BHTH1THIYH\ P- BLTYLWPH# CPS UTL0 343B-

BPYH=US PU- B^HT7 PRRL- B^HT# 1S HTKH0 343B- CHPJO# =HWH0 343B- CHS HTYOHG URMM- CHWH

?UWS HT- CJUMPLRK # 2W HTY- CLHT=UKOUR_- CUVOPL 8HWY- CYHMMUWK # 3HWWPL0 343B- CYL[L

6HS H- DHTN # COPWRL^0 343B- DOUS HX ?URHT- DUJOL# 4PHTH0 343B- DWHJL > HPUWPTU-

G LILW# ?PJOURHX0 343B

$-" 2LTH[PKL_# CZ _HTTL0 343B- DHRUW# > PWHTKH

); ,1.-9" 3@F94 4HYHCZ S S HW MUW& +$ '*$ (' !5]YLWTHRCYHQ LOURKLWX"

# 99+-/4 .598" 3@F94 FHJJPTL BLMZ XHRBHYL I^ > LTYHR8LHRYO =L[LRUM3HWL 1WS XYWUTN HTK 3RHWQ

(& ('& +'*%]RX]

E\`S4ROOT \Z *3) +1) ,+

* ' CB CG ? 4 F=B A H4 6 6 =A 4 F=B A 8 9 9 B DFE3

33&/*3 ]OWS[_ #32(2! $ VObS PSS[\TTS SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S5 OQQS]Ò[QS OS W_ 13! OZ \[U `V\_S

\TTS SR(

11&/*2)33&/*3 #13! \T`V\_S \TTS SR&11! \T`\ÒY; <; I]\]a YOW\[$ OQQS]`SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S(

GS QS[ \T; FM@<'[OgbS ]OWS[_ bOQQW[OSR41.! #,0! \T; FM@<'[OgbS ]OWS[_ OS a [bOQQW[OSR$

GS QS[ \T; FM@<' S_\YbSR ]OWS[_ bOQQW[OSR4/.!

/*&0*3 VObS VOR O; FM@< RWOU [\_W_(

+ ' EF4 F8 I =7 8 CB CG? 4 F=B A H4 6 6 =A 8 7 4 F4 3

G Z Q N] R Q 3 1 ( + 0 ( + ) + * 2 ( , ( + ) + * 2 ( * ) ( + ) + * 2 ( * 0 ( + ) + *

CN] UR X ] \ / . % & 6 Y _ UQ A Nb_ R [7 ,&/1* [7,&/1+ [7 ,&/02 [7 ,&/0.

FTTS SR4 ,&//1 #33(.! $ ,&/0* #33(/! $ ,&//3 #33(0! $ ,&//1 #33(1! $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 ,&-02 ,&-02 ,&-02 ,&-1+

<SQYW[SR4 ,*, +3, +3+ +20

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3-! 3,! 3-! 3-!

CN] UR X ] \ 6 Y _ UQ EP Y [ R "/ & 6 Y _ UQ A Nb_ R [7,2.- [7,&2/* [7 ,&2.1 [7,&2..

FTTS SR4 ,&2-+ #33(/! $ ,&2.* #33(0! $ ,&2-2 #33(0! $ ,&2-0 #33(1! $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 ,&0/+ ,&0/3 ,&00+ ,&00-

<SQYW[SR4 +2* +2+ +11 +1-

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3.! 3.! 3.! 3.!

CN] UR X ] \ 6 Y _ UQ EP Y [ R ", & 6 Y _ UQ A Nb_ R [73**+ [73&*,, [72&33- [7 2&321

FTTS SR4 23*, #32(3! $ 2&32, #33(/! $ 2&30/ #33(0! $ 230, #33(1! $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 1&312 2&**, 1&33, 2&*+,

<SQYW[SR4 320 32* 31- 3/*

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 23! 23! 23! 23!


"

4 VV CN] UR X ] \ [733&01, [7 33&2*+ [733&/31 [733&/*3

FTTS SR432&/1-

#32(2! $

32&/0-

#32(1! $

32&/./

#32(3! $

32&-02

#32(2! $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 11&*3+ 11&.// 11&-2* 11&/*2

<SQYW[SR4 ,+&.2, ,+&+*2 ,+&*1. ,*&20*

8QQS]`O[QS IOS4 12! 13! 13! 13!

* + 1

* + 1 % Z ] \

`VO[

*3) +* ) ,+

, ' H4 6 6 =A 8 4 6 6 8 CF4 A 6 8 D4 F8 5 K @ < ? B 6 4 A 7 6 ? 4 D> ( 4 D@ EFDB A ; EF4 FGE

E]N] R ` UQ R G@G D ? ; 9 =FGD ? J<J

FbS OYY<<G <GG

4 P P R Z ]NX P R

"0 / " 0 1 " 1 + " 1 * " 1 1 " 2 ) "

L ]ROSR *3) +1) ,+

- ' C4 F=8 A FE A B FB 9 9 8 D8 7 H4 6 6 =A 8 #O a =X \ ] U] ^ ] UY X $3

! C] \ A Y ] B SSR [ R Q HNP P UX R

4 X Q 6 ^ [ [ R X ] Va UX =X \ ] U] ^ ] UY X

4 \ Y S ) 2 ( * 0 ( + *

@[_`

; FM@< IW_X

JQ\ S

$#

; FM@<

IW_X JQ\ S

-'/

; FM@<

IW_X JQ\ S

6 -

K\`OY

G _

8JG + +

; 8; *

; 8C *

; ; ; *

; ; @ *

; ; N >% +3 +3

; =E *

; ? ; > *

; @D - -

; @N + +

; D ; *

; D > + +

; FI *

; I; + +

; K> *

; MJG *

<M@ *

>JG + +

? <JG 2 2

@JG * % %


#

B MJG *

C8; + +

D ; JG , ,

EB JG% , -, -.

G9JG + +

GMJG *

IA< *

J8; * % %

J8K> - -

J; ; 2 2

JFC + +

JH + +

JMJG + +

MJG *

N JG% .// .//

% ISQS]`W\[QS[S _ . - +

% % Kc \ ]OWS[_ OYYS U WQ`\ bOQQW[S( #@JG" J8; $

K\ÒY ' 8YYS U d ' I; _ 7

/., , /*0 -.

. ' =A EF=FGF=B A 4 ? 8 @ C? B K8 8 H4 6 6 =A 4 F=B A 8 9 9 B DFE3

-+&0., W[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS PSS[bOQQW[OSR c WV O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S

-+&0., ) //&013 7 /1! \TW[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS PSS[ORZ W[W_`S SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S

8 `\ÒY\T+3&+,, W[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS VOR O; FM@< RWOU [\_W_

/ ' EF4 F8 I =7 8 EF4 9 9 H4 6 6 =A 8 7 4 F4 3

G Z Q N] R Q 3 1 ( + 0 ( + ) + * 2 ( , ( + ) + * 2 ( * ) ( + ) + * 2 ( * 0 ( + ) + *

E]NSS HNP P UX R 7 N]N3 [7 0/&3,+ [70/&30* [7 0/&32/ [700&+33

K\ÒYJ OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 -1&*03 #/0! $ -1&/,, #/1! $ -2&*2- #/2! $ -2&33. #/3! $

=X \ ] U] ^ ] UY X NV E]NSS 7 N]N3 [7//&/2. [7 //&0,1 [7 //&0/3 [7//&013

@[_` J OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 ,3&3., #/.! $ -*&-0+ #//! $ -*&231 #/0! $ -+&0., #/1! $

0 ' C4 F=8 A F, D7 7 B E8 5 K =A EF=FGF=B A

=X \ ] U] ^ ] UY X

!

=W W ^ X Y P Y W Z [ Y W U\ R Q

Z N] UR X ] \

FY ]NV CN] UR X ] \

6 ^ [ [ R X ] Va 7 ^ R

7 Y \ R ,

B SSR [ R Q

HNP P UX N] R Q

` U] T 7 Y \ R

,

7 Y \ R ,

DR S^ \ R Q

8JG 2 2 2 1 +

; 8; 0 0 0 . ,

; 8C 3 3 3 2 +

; ; ; + + + * +

; ; @ +- +- +- 3 .

; ; N > 12 10 1/ 00 3

; =E +2 +2 +1 +- .

; ? ; > -*- -*, ,32 ,2- +/


$

; @D -*/ -*/ -*. ,20 +2

; @N 01 01 0. // 3

; D ; 3* 3* 2/ 2* /

; D > ,-3 ,-1 ,-. ,++ ,-

; FI -1 -1 -0 -, .

; I; ,+ ,+ ,+ +3 ,

; K> 3/ 3- 3+ 20 /

; MJG -0 -0 -/ -+ .

<M@ * * * * *

>JG 01 00 00 /1 3

? <JG +3 +2 +2 +. .

@JG ,* ,* ,* +2 ,

B MJG ,2 ,2 ,2 ,. .

C8; +0+ +/2 +/1 +-3 +2

D ; JG .1, .03 .00 ..3 +1

EB JG ,* +1 +1 +- .

G9JG ,+ ,+ ,+ +3 ,

GMJG , , + + *

IA< -,2 -,. -+2 ,2* -2

J8; 21 20 2/ 1, +-

J8K> /* /* /* .2 ,

J; ; +. +. +. +. *

JFC ,*, +31 +3/ +1* ,/

JH ,/* ,.1 ,.. ,,2 +0

JMJG 12 11 11 02 3

MJG 3+ 3+ 3* 20 .

N JG ,- ,* +2 +, 0

FY ]NV\ 3 , &+ . 2 , &+ + - , &* 1 + + &2 ) + + 1 )

L ]ROSR

*3) +1) ,+

D WO[ROKOdY\^

# 22,23( . 3 3/ % ,1* )3/ 1 &/ 2* 0 + $ ,)- ! ' "% "

; OYWT\ [WO; \^ SQ W\[OY? SOYV ; OS JS bWQS_

; SYY4#3+0$/+-'+3-2 e <S_X 4#3+0$03+'3,/,

This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here to report this email asspam.


Exhibit B


!

%764 " CG]QTV# = OVGSJG- = OVGSJG%CG]QTV/ IJIV%IG%M TZ.

).59" 5VOJG]# ?IXTHKV'*# (& (' )+'& @=

*6" 0%>TVVOW, 0QOWTS7GVJ], 1GVVT[ # ATWITK/ 232A, 1KSX # = KQOWWG/ 232A, 1OIP # 3V%

9TWKUN/ 232A, 2QGVP ; KQWT !IP KQWT/ @028582%43D ", 3GR TS= I2QGOS, 3GZOJ BGSJKVW,

3GZOW# CGR O]G/ 232A, 3TSBUKIXKV, 4J B[ GSWTS, 4VSKWX 6 GQZGS, 5KVM Y WTS#

@GXVOIOG/ 232A, 5TWW# CGR R ]/ 232A, 6 VKM M 0JGR , 7KOSX # <OWG/ 232A, 8VGR 7GWGS,

9GR OK 3Y UVKK, 9TNSWTS# 6 GSSTS/ 232A, ; KQWT# 2QGVP / 232A, ; OVP QGSJ# AOINGVJ/ 232A,

; ]QK <K[ OW, <GY VG1O\H], <OWG4QQW, = GVXOS3TJJ , = GXX <TUKW, = OINGKQ1OKS, >KOQQ#

9KSSOLKV/ 232A, ?WXQOSM # <OSJG, @GY Q= KQQT, AGSG0SGHXG[ O, AKSXKVOG# BOR TSK/ 232A,

AOXG<TR OT, A]GS6 OQQK, A]GS# 0R GSJG/ 232A, BGOIN# <GVG/ 232A, BGR GSXNGF TQLL, BGVG

>TVR GS, BITLOKQJ # 1V]GSX, BKGS<TJNTQ , BTUNOK 7GVX, BXGLLTVJ # 2GVVOK/ 232A, BXKZK

5GR G, CGSM # BNOVQK]/ 232A, CNTR GW >TQGS, CTINK# 3OGSG/ 232A, CVGIK = GOTVOST,

F KHKV# >OINTQGW/ 232A

$-" CG]QTV# = OVGSJG, 1KSGZOJK^# BY ^GSSK/ 232A

); ,1.-9" 2?E83 3GXGBY R R GV] LTV'& $ '*$ (' !4\XKVSGQBXGP KNTQJKVW"

# 99+-/4 .598" 2?E83 EGIIOSK AKLY WGQAGXK H] = KSXGQ7KGQXN <KZKQTL2GVK 0VR WXVTSM GSJ 2QGVP

(& (''& '*%\QW\


32&*+* ]OWS[_ #32(3" $ VObS PSS[\TTS SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S5 OQQS]Ò[QS OS W_ 2*" OZ \[U `V\_S

\TTS SR(

12&-//)33&*// #13" \T`V\_S \TTS SR&11" \T`\ÒY; <; I]\]a YOW\[$ OQQS]`SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S(

GS QS[ \T; FM@<'[OhbS ]OWS[_ bOQQW[OSR41/" #,/" \T; FM@<'[OhbS ]OWS[_ OS a [bOQQW[OSR$

GS QS[ \T; FM@<' S_\YbSR ]OWS[_ bOQQW[OSR40,"

/+&*+* VObS VOR O; FM@< RWOU [\_W_(

+ ' EF4 F8 I =7 8 CB CG? 4 F=B A H4 6 6 =A 8 7 4 F4 3

G Y Q N \ R Q 3 2 ( + - ( + ) + * * ) ( * ( + ) + * * ) ( 1 ( + ) + * * ) ( * . ( + ) + *

E\ N SS HN P P UW R 7 N \ N 3 [700&,3* [7 00&-*, [7 00&-** [7 00&,23

K\ÒYJ OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 -3&300 #0*" $ .*&200 #0," $ .+&/+0 #0," $ .,&,03 #0." $

=W [ \ U\ ] \ UX W N V E\ N SS 7 N \ N 3 [7//&1/3 [7 //&111 [7 //&1/2 [7//&1/.

@[_` J OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 -,&/.+ #/2" $ --&,/. #0*" $ --&233 #0+" $ -.&/21 #0," $

CN \ UR W \ [ / . % & 6 X ^ UQ A N a^ R [7 ,&//2 [7,&//2 [7 ,&//0 [7,&/0/

FTTS SR4 ,&//* #33(1" $ ,&//* #33(1" $ ,&/.3 #33(1" $ ,&//, #33(/" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 ,&-1+ ,&-1+ ,&-1+ ,&-11

<SQYW[SR4 +13 +13 +12 +1/

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3-" 3-" 3-" 3-"

CN \ UR W \ [ 6 X ^ UQ EP X Z R "/ & 6 X ^ UQ A N a^ R [7 ,&12- [7 ,&12- [7 ,&12/ [7,&122

FTTS SR4 ,&110 #33(1" $ ,&110 #33(1" $ ,&112 #33(1" $ ,&12* #33(1" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 ,&0+2 ,&0+2 ,&0,+ ,&0,3

<SQYW[SR4 +/2 +/2 +/1 +/+

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3." 3." 3." 3/"

CN \ UR W \ [ 6 X ^ UQ EP X Z R ", & 6 X ^ UQ A N a^ R [7 2&1+0 [7 2&1+0 [7 2&1/- [72&12,

FTTS SR4 2&0-1 #33(*" $ 2&0-1 #33(*" $ 2&012 #33(+" $ 2&1/- #33(0" $


"

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 1&2*3 1&2*3 1&2-. 1&3+-

<SQYW[SR4 22, 22, 2.. 2.*

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 23" 23" 3*" 3*"

4 VV CN \ UR W \ [ [733&-0- [7 33&.+3 [7 33&*2, [733&*//

FTTS SR432&-1-

#33(*" $

32&-,-

#32(3" $

32&+..

#33(+" $

32&*+*

#32(3" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 11&030 11&13+ 11&31, 12&-//

<SQYW[SR4 ,*&011 ,*&/-, ,*&+1, +3&0//

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 13" 13" 13" 2*"

+ 1 , . / -

. / - % Y \ [

`VO[

+* ) *2) ,+


E\ N \ R _ UQ R G@G D ? ; 9 =FGD ? J<J

FbS OYY<<G <GG

4 P P R Y \ N W P R

"0 1 " 0 . " 1 + " 1 + " 1 1 " 2 * "

L ]ROSR +* ) +/) ,+

- ' C4 F=8 A FE A B FB 9 9 8 D8 7 H4 6 6 =A 8 #O ` =W [ \ U\ ] \ UX W $3

! C\ [ A X \ B SSR Z R Q HN P P UW R

4 W Q 6 ] Z Z R W \ V` UW =W [ \ U\ ] \ UX W

4 [ X S * ) ( * . ( + *

@[_`

; FM@< IW_X

JQ\ S

$#

; FM@<

IW_X JQ\ S

-'/

; FM@<

IW_X JQ\ S

6 -

K\ÒY

G _

8JG - -

; 8; *

; 8C *

; ; ; *

; ; @ + +

; ; N >% .+ .+

; =E + +

; ? ; > *

; @D , ,

; @N , ,

; D ; *

; D > + +

; FI , ,

; I; . .

; K> *

; MJG *

<M@ *

>JG *


#

? <JG 3 3

@JG + +

B MJG *

C8; + +

D ; JG + + ,

EB JG% - /+ /.

G9JG *

GMJG + +

IA< *

J8; + +

J8K> / /

J; ; 0 0

JFC *

JH + +

JMJG , ,

MJG *

N JG% +. .*0 .,*

% ISQS]`W\[QS[S _ . / )

K\ÒY ' 8YYS U d ' I; _ 7

/0* , .32 0*


-.&/21 W[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS PSS[bOQQW[OSR c WV O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S

-.&/21 ) //&1/. 7 0," \TW[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS PSS[ORZ W[W_`S SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S

8 `\ÒY\T+3&0/+ W[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS VOR O; FM@< RWOU [\_W_

/ ' EF4 F8 I =7 8 EF4 9 9 H4 6 6 =A 8 7 4 F4 3

G Y Q N \ R Q 3 2 ( + - ( + ) + * * ) ( * ( + ) + * * ) ( 1 ( + ) + * * ) ( * . ( + ) + *

E\ N SS HN P P UW R 7 N \ N 3 [700&,3* [7 00&-*, [7 00&-** [7 00&,23

K\ÒYJ OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 -3&300 #0*" $ .*&200 #0," $ .+&/+0 #0," $ .,&,03 #0." $

=W [ \ U\ ] \ UX W N V E\ N SS 7 N \ N 3 [7//&1/3 [7 //&111 [7 //&1/2 [7//&1/.

@[_` J OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 -,&/.+ #/2" $ --&,/. #0*" $ --&233 #0+" $ -.&/21 #0," $

0 ' , D7 7 B E8 C4 F=8 A F7 4 F4

@[_`

Wa`W

\[

K\ÒYGOWS[_

ISQ\Z Z S[RSR `\

ISQSWbS -Z Q 7 X [ R

K\ÒYGOWS[_

; a ^ S[Yd=YWU WPYS

#<a S <OS T\^-Z Q

7 X [ R DR N P T R Q $

FT`VS_S&! c V\

VObS PSS[\TTS SR

- R R\_S

FT`V\_S \TTS SR&!

c V\ OQQS]`SR - R

R\_S

EI * - &2 0 ) * , &1 0 1 . &. - ) , 2 '2 " - &2 2 / 2 ) '+ "


$

@[_`Wa `W\[

K\ÒYGOWS[_

ISQ\Z Z S[RSR `\

ISQSWbS -Z Q 7 X [ R

K\ÒYGOWS[_

; a ^ S[Yd=YWU WPYS

#<a S <OS T\^-Z Q

7 X [ R DR N P T R Q $

<\_S - FTTS SRMOQQW[OSR c WV

<\_S -

8JG 00 ,/ / /

; 8; .1 +0 ++ 1

; 8C ./ -, -* ,/

; ; ; +/ 1 + *

; ; @ /+ .0 +/ ++

; ; N > +-2 +** 3/ 2*

; =E // ., -. ,3

; ? ; > +1+0 +003 0++ /20

; @D .++ -12 --0 -*3

; @N 33 2- 1. 0,

; D ; +++2 ++* * 2- 11

; D > -2+ -0+ ,/, ,,1

; FI /+- .21 -, ,2

; I; +., .1 ./ -0

; K> ,+/1 ,+* * +,3 ++/

; MJG 2, 0* ., -2

<M@ * * * *

>JG +,0 ++- ++. 3/

? <JG // .2 .- -0

@JG /+ ,1 +. +,

B MJG 20 2* 03 /2

C8; ,/- ,-2 ,*3 +12

D ; JG ,,-1 ,,*1 ++-+ ++*2

EB JG +.+ /0 .. -1

G9JG .+ -2 ,, +3

GMJG 03 -- + +

IA< +31, +3-- +**, 2..

J8; 3*0 221 2/ 1-

J8K> 0.1 0-1 +1, +/2

J; ; +** 01 ++ ++

JFC ,/, ,.0 ,+0 +2.

JH -1- -+3 ,/+ ,,2

JMJG +3. +20 +2- +//

MJG +02 +/2 +/2 +.3

N JG ,0- /, ,* +/

EI * - 2 0 ) * , 1 0 1 . . - ) - 2 2 /

K\ÒYGOWS[_ ISQ\Z Z S[RSR `\ ISQSWbS O- R <\_S 7 @Z Z a [\Q\Z ] \Z W_SR ]OWS[_ c V\ SQSWbSR O[Z IE8 bOQQW[S

#GTWeS^\^D \RS [O$ FIO[d]OWS[ V\a _SR OO[W[_`Wa `W\[c V\ SQSWbSR P\`V R\_S_ \TGTWeS^bOQQW[S( KVW_ [a Z PS^

R\S_ [\` Q\[_WRS^Ra S ROS T\^- R R\_S(

K\ÒYGOWS[_ ; a ^ S[Yd=YWU WPYS 7 > \Z `VS K\ÒYGOWS[ ISQ\Z Z S[RSR `\ ISQSWbS O- R <\_S&`V\_S c V\_S - R R\_S

Ra S ROS VO_ PSS[ SOQVSR #W(S( Z \ S `VO[,2 ROd_ T\^WZ Z a [\Q\Z ] \Z W_SR ]OWS[_ FIZ \ S `VO[0 Z \[V_ T\^[\['

WZ Z a [\Q\Z ] \Z W_SR ]OWS[_ `VO SQSWbSR , R\_S_ \TGTWeS^bOQQW[S(


%

D WO[ROKOdY\^

# 22,23( . 3 3/ % ,1* )3/ 1 &/ 2* 0 + $ ,)- ! ' "% "


; SYY4#3+0$/+-'+3-2 f <S_X 4#3+0$03+'3,/,



Exhibit C


!

%764 " DHRUW# > PWHTKH. > PWHTKH%DHRUW0 JKJW%JH%N U[/

).59" 6WPKH# ?U[LS ILW)# (& (' +,)* A>

*6" 1%?UWWPX- 1RPXUT8HWK^- 2HWWU\ # BUXJUL0 343B- 2LTY_# > LRPXXH0 343B- 2PJQ # 4W%

;UXLVO0 343B- 3RHWQ < LRXU !JQ LRXU0 A139693%54E "- 4HS UT> J3RHPT- 4H[PK CHTKLWX-

4H[PX# DHS P H0 343B- 4UTCVLJYLW- 5K C\ HTXUT- 5WTLXY 7 HR[HT- 6LWN Z XUT#

AHYWPJPH0 343B- 6UXX# DHS S ^0 343B- 7 WLN N 1KHS - 8LPTY_# =PXH0 343B- 9WHS 8HXHT-

;HS PL 4Z VWLL- ;UOTXUT# 7 HTTUT0 343B- < LRXU# 3RHWQ 0 343B- < PWQ RHTK# BPJOHWK0 343B-

< ^RL =L\ PX- =HZ WH2P]I^- =PXH5RRX- > HWYPT4UKK - > HYY =UVLX- > PJOHLR2PLT- ?LPRR#

;LTTPMLW0 343B- @XYRPTN # =PTKH- AHZ R> LRRU- BHTH1THIYH\ P- BLTYLWPH# CPS UTL0 343B-

BPYH=US PU- B^HT7 PRRL- B^HT# 1S HTKH0 343B- CHPJO# =HWH0 343B- CHS HTYOHG URMM- CHWH

?UWS HT- CJUMPLRK # 2W HTY- CLHT=UKOUR_- CUVOPL 8HWY- CYHMMUWK # 3HWWPL0 343B- CYL[L

6HS H- DHTN # COPWRL^0 343B- DOUS HX ?URHT- DUJOL# 4PHTH0 343B- DWHJL > HPUWPTU-

G LILW# ?PJOURHX0 343B

$-" 2LTH[PKL_# CZ _HTTL0 343B- DHRUW# > PWHTKH

); ,1.-9" 3@F94 4HYHCZ S S HW MUW''$ & )$ (' !5]YLWTHRCYHQ LOURKLWX"

# 99+-/4 .598" 3@F94 FHJJPTL BLMZ XHRBHYL I^ > LTYHR8LHRYO =L[LRUM3HWL 1WS XYWUTN HTK 3RHWQ

(& ('''& )%]RX]


32&0*2 ]OWS[_ #32(2" $ VObS PSS[\TTS SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S5 OQQS]Ò[QS OS W_ 2+" OZ \[U `V\_S

\TTS SR(

13&1,.)32&0*2 #2+" \T`V\_S \TTS SR&13" \T`\ÒY; <; I]\]a YOW\[$ OQQS]`SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S(

GS QS[ \T; FM@<'[OgbS ]OWS[_ bOQQW[OSR410" #,." \T; FM@<'[OgbS ]OWS[_ OS a [bOQQW[OSR$

GS QS[ \T; FM@<' S_\YbSR ]OWS[_ bOQQW[OSR40*"

/+&-/0 VObS VOR O; FM@< RWOU [\_W_(

+ ' EF4 F8 I =7 8 CB CG? 4 F=B A H4 6 6 =A 8 7 4 F4 3

G X Q N [ R Q 3 * ) ( * . ( + ) + * * ) ( + + ( + ) + * * ) ( + 2 ( + ) + * * * ( . ( + ) + *

CN [ TR V [ Z / . % & 6 W ] TQ A N `] R [7,&/0/ [7 ,&/2, [7,&/22 [7 ,&/2-

FTTS SR4 ,&//, #33(/" $ ,&/03 #33(/" $ ,&/10 #33(/" $ ,&/1/ #33(0" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 ,&-11 ,&-3, ,&.*- ,&.*0

<SQYW[SR4 +1/ +11 +1- +03

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3-" 3-" 3-" 3-"

CN [ TR V [ Z 6 W ] TQ EP W Y R "/ & 6 W ] TQ A N `] R [7,&122 [7 ,&2*0 [7,&2*2 [7 ,&2,,

FTTS SR4 ,&12* #33(1" $ ,&131 #33(1" $ ,&133 #33(1" $ ,&2+0 #33(1" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 ,&0,3 ,&0., ,&0/- ,&01-

<SQYW[SR4 +/+ +// +.0 +.-

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3/" 3." 3." 3/"

CN [ TR V [ Z 6 W ] TQ EP W Y R ", & 6 W ] TQ A N `] R [72&12, [7 2&2,- [7 2&20- [7 2&200

FTTS SR4 2&1/- #33(0" $ 2&13- #33(0" $ 2&2+3 #33(/" $ 2&12, #33(+" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 1&3+- 1&3// 1&330 2&*./

<SQYW[SR4 2.* 2-2 2,- 2*.

8QQS]Ò[QS IOS4 3*" 3*" 3*" 3+"

4 UU CN [ TR V [ Z [733&*// [7 33&-.0 [7 33&0/2 [7 33&1-0


"

FTTS SR432&*+*

#32(3" $

32&,/1

#32(3" $

32&.-0

#32(1" $

32&0*2

#32(2" $

8QQS]`SR #O YSO_` + R\_S$4 12&-// 12&122 13&-.- 13&1,.

<SQYW[SR4 +3&0// +3&.03 +3&*3- +2&22.

8QQS]`O[QS IOS4 2*" 2*" 2+" 2+"

2 , /

2 , / % X [ Z

`VO[

+* ) ,3),+


E[ N [ R ^ TQ R G@G D ? ; 9 =FGD ? J<J

FbS OYY<<G <GG

4 P P R X [ N V P R " 0 1 " 0 . " 1 , " 1 + " 1 2 " 2 * "

L ]ROSR ++) /) ,+

- ' C4 F=8 A FE A B FB 9 9 8 D8 7 H4 6 6 =A 8 #O _ =V Z [ T[ \ [ TW V $3

! C[ Z A W [ B SSR Y R Q HN P P TV R

4 V Q 6 \ Y Y R V [ U_ TV =V Z [ T[ \ [ TW V

4 Z W S * * ( ) . ( + ) + *

@[_`

; FM@< IW_X

JQ\ S

$#

; FM@<

IW_X JQ\ S

-'/

; FM@<

IW_X JQ\ S

6 -

K\`OY

G _

8JG + +

; 8; + +

; 8C *

; ; ; *

; ; @ *

; ; N >% +/ +/

; =E + +

; ? ; > + + ,

; @D + +

; @N + +

; D ; / /

; D > + +

; FI , ,

; I; *

; K> + . /

; MJG + +

<M@ *

>JG *

? <JG 3 3

@JG + +

B MJG + +

C8; *


#

D ; JG + +

EB JG% + +-3 +.*

G9JG + +

GMJG + +

IA< , ,

J8; *

J8K> + . /

J; ; - -

JFC + +

JH + +

JMJG + +

MJG *

N JG% . +0 /.- /0-

% ISQS]`W\[QS[S _ 0 / /

K\ÒY ' 8YYS U d ' I; _ 7

100 , 031 01


-0&+.0 W[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS PSS[bOQQW[OSR c WV O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S

-0&+.0 ) //&22- 7 0/" \TW[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS PSS[ORZ W[W_`S SR O YSO_` \[S R\_S \TbOQQW[S

8 `\ÒY\T,*&+.3 W[_`Wa `W\[OY_ÒTTVObS VOR O; FM@< RWOU [\_W_

/ ' EF4 F8 I =7 8 EF4 9 9 H4 6 6 =A 8 7 4 F4 3

G X Q N [ R Q 3 * ) ( * . ( + ) + * * ) ( + + ( + ) + * * ) ( + 2 ( + ) + * * * ( . ( + ) + *

E[ N SS HN P P TV R 7 N [ N 3 [7 00&,23 [700&-,. [700&-10 [7 00&.1.

K\ÒYJ OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 .,&,03 #0." $ .-&*2+ #0/" $ .-&0** #00" $ .-&33, #00" $

=V Z [ T[ \ [ TW V N U E[ N SS 7 N [ N 3 [7//&1/. [7 //&03* [7 //&3.+ [7 //&22-

@[_ ( J OTTISQSWbSR +_` <\_S4 -.&/21 #0," $ -/&,-2 #0-" $ -/&2,. #0." $ -0&+.0 #0/" $

0 ' , D7 7 B E8 C4 F=8 A F7 4 F4

@[_`

Wa`W

\[

K\ÒYGOWS[_

ISQ\Z Z S[RSR `\

ISQSWbS -Y Q 7 W Z R

K\ÒYGOWS[_

<\_S - <a S O_ \T

++) /) ,+

FT`VS_S&! c V\ VObS

PSS[\TTS SR - R R\_S

FT`V\_S \TTS SR&! c V\

OQQS]`SR - R R\_S

EI / / &) - 2 . . &/ * ) * * &2 . 0 + * '. " * ) &- + . 1 0 '+ "

@[_`Wa `W\[

K\ÒYGOWS[_

ISQ\Z Z S[RSR `\

ISQSWbS -Y Q 7 W Z R

<\_S - <a S O_ \T

++) /) ,+<\_S - FTTS SR

MOQQW[OSR c WV

<\_S -

8JG ,2.- ,2*1 ./ -0

; 8; +,,3 +,*. -, ,/

; 8C +2.2 +2*1 .1 .+


$

; ; ; ++., +*20 +*- /0

; ; @ +22, +2,/ 0. /1

; ; N > +.// +,.+ ,-3 ,+-

; =E ,*.0 +3,1 +/* ++2

; ? ; > +3,/ +-+1 0+1 0*2

; @D ,*.1 +02+ -2* -00

; @N 023 0+2 1/ 1+

; D ; ,**0 +23+ ++3 ++/

; D > +/1- ++23 .+0 -2.

; FI ,.22 ,*10 .00 .+,

; I; +2,0 +1,3 ++1 31

; K> -1+0 ,3,1 2/* 123

; MJG +231 +2.* 0* /1

<M@ . . * *

>JG +2., +.,1 /-- .+,

? <JG +3-+ +220 .2 ./

@JG +.-1 +.+1 ,, ,*

B MJG ,*0. +321 21 11

C8; +2+- +.+1 /*1 -3/

D ; JG -+/* +,// +3/3 +23/

EB JG +-03 +,1, ++2 3-

G9JG +-+3 +,2- -1 -0

GMJG +,,0 ++3/ -, -+

IA< ,//, 22* ,+*3 +01+

J8; +,,1 10, 1.3 .0,

J8K> -/13 -*31 /,0 .2,

J; ; ,**0 +32+ ,/ ,/

JFC ,*0, +2.+ ,-3 ,,+

JH ,.33 +22- 0-* 0+0

JMJG +1*0 +.02 ,1+ ,-2

MJG ,./+ ,,03 +3* +2,

N JG +,** ++,+ 3/ 13

EI / / &) - 2 . . &/ * ) * * &2 . 0 * ) &- + .

% ISQ\Z Z S[RSR W[QYa RS ]OWS[_ SYWU WPYS T\^OP\\_`S^R\_S O[R)\^WZ Z a [\Q\Z ] \Z W_SR

D WO[ROKOdY\^

# 22,23( . 3 3/ % ,1* )3/ 1 &/ 2* 0 + $ ,)- ! ' "% "



%

; SYY4#3+0$/+-'+3-2 e <S_X 4#3+0$03+'3,/,



of september 27, 2021 and october 27, 2021 orders re

Documents