oecd workshop on inter-agency crisis management

21
Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management June 28, 2012

Upload: loan

Post on 14-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management. June 28, 2012. Agenda. ■ The Great East Japan Earthquake ■ It’s all about “boundaries” ■ Implications and our challenge. Unprecedented challenge for Japan since 3 ・ 11. The Great East Earthquakes. Earthquakes M-9.0 quake (March 11) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Office of Global CommunicationsPrime Minister's Office

OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

June 28, 2012

Page 2: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 2Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

Agenda

■The Great East Japan Earthquake

■ It’s all about “boundaries”

■ Implications and our challenge

Page 3: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 3Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

Unprecedented challenge for Japan since 3・ 11

Main cause of physical damage was enormous tsunami

The Great East Earthquakes The Great East Earthquakes

Earthquakes• M-9.0 quake (March 11)• M-7.0 class 5 times• M-6.0 class 71 times• M-5.0 class 380 times (As of May

16th)

Casualties (As of July)• Dead : over 15,600• Missing: over 4900• Injured: over 5,300

Evacuees (As of May)• Over 124,000

Source: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry

Page 4: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 4Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

The Great East Japan Earthquake led to a compound of disasters

Source: literature research, The Boston Consulting Group

(3)Secondary damage caused by psychological factors

(2)

Secondary damage caused by material factors

(1)Primary damage

Structure of the chain of compound damage

Structure of the chain of compound damage

Earthquake

Tsunami

Nuclear power plant

Power shortage

Suspicion of safety of Japanese products overseas

Plummet in foreign touristnumbers

DamageDamage

2:46 pm, Mar 11

• Magnitude 9.0 earthquake at Sanriku coast

3:51 pm, Mar 11• 9.3m tsunami strikes Soma city, Fukushima

prefecture

3:36 pm, Mar 12• Fukushima Dai-ichi Reactor 1 structure collapses• Atomic fuel meltdown occurs

Mar 14 ~• Rolling blackouts in Kanto prefectures in March

Mar 14 ~• At least 50 countries/regions, starting with H.K. &

China, impose import restrictions apart from products restricted by the Japanese Gvt.

Mar~• Visitors decrease 50% compared to 2010

Page 5: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 5Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

After the Ise Bay typhoon in 1959, the Japanese government made extensive effort to develop the disaster prevention systemHistory of disasters in Japan

Policies introducedPolicies introduced

YearYear Dead/

missing

Dead/missing Lessons

Lessons

Revised town construction law [disaster risk reduction]

• First earthquake resistance regulations in the world

1923 105,000Great Kanto earthquake

Unprecedented damage• Buildings constructed using

Western earthquake resistance technology collapsed

Former Ministry of Education established a disaster prevention investigation committee [disaster risk reduction]

• Began earthquake resistance structure research– Researched Western earthquake

resistance construction

1891 7,300

Nobi earthquake

Government made aware of the importance of earthquake measures

Revised construction standards law [disaster risk reduction]

• Doubled the horizontal seismic coefficient

1948 3,769Fukuiearthquake

First major earthquake after WW2, causing massive damage

Enacted the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act [governance]

• Established Central Disaster Prevention Council headed by the Prime Minister

Built early warning system [early disaster warning]

• Radar on the summit of Mt. Fuji• Launched Himawari weather satellite

Built seawalls [disaster risk reduction]

1959 5,098

Ise Bay typhoon

Inadequate government role in disaster prevention

• Led by local groups such as flood fighting teams

• Inappropriate warning systems• Inadequate seawalls and dams

Source: Emergency White Paper (2010), The Boston Consulting Group

Page 6: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 6Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

After the Hanshin Awaji earthquake in 1995, top-down deployment and strengthening building structure was a priorityHistory of disasters in Japan (cont'd)

Miyagi earthquake

1978 28 Major revision of construction standards  [disaster risk reduction]

• Introduced new earthquake resistance design law– buildings that would not collapse even under

a force 7 earthquake

Many concrete apartment buildings thought to be resistant collapsed

Hanshin Awaji earthquake

1995 6,437 Earthquake early warning system implemented [early warning]

• Switched from earthquake prediction

Enacted earthquake resistance improvement law  [disaster risk reduction]

• Improving earthquake resistance of existing structures became a key issue

Rapid top-down response [emergency/recovery response]

• Established Cabinet information gathering center and crisis center at the PM's residence

• Law revised to enable quick response by firefighters and self defense forces

• Increased seismic observation points for immediate identification of damage in each area

Recovery support for victims [emergency/recovery response]

• Government financial support up to \3M

No output from earthquake prediction research

98% of buildings that were destroyed were built before the amended construction lawLocal government functions were stopped by the disaster

• Notification reached the PM two hours after the earthquake

• Delayed response by firefighters and self defense forces

• Delay in identifying damage in each area

Unable to rebuild based on donations alone

Hokkaido earthquake

1993 230 Shortened forecast time from five minutes to three minutes [early warning]

Tsunami arrived before the warning system could function

Source: Emergency White Paper (2010), The Boston Consulting Group

Policies introducedPolicies introduced

YearYear Dead/

missing

Dead/missing

LessonsLessons

Page 7: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 7Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

The framework of Disaster Countermeasure Basic Act in Japan was crystallized and disseminated globally as the Hyogo Framework for Action

Source: Cabinet Office; Asian Disaster Reduction Center; The Boston Consulting group

Date

Outline of the UN World Conferenceon disaster prevention

Outline of the UN World Conferenceon disaster prevention

January, 2005• 10th anniversary of Great Hanshin quake

Kobe city, Hyogo prefecture

United Nations• Chairperson was the Japanese Minister

responsible for disaster prevention

HFA crystallized the framework of the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act, proposed as the global guideline

• Governance• Comprehensive approach to disaster prevention

process– Risk identification, assessment, monitoring

and early warning – Knowledge management &

education– Reducing underlying

risk factors– Preparedness for

effective response &recovery

Held

Host

Outline

Key points of Hyogo Framework for ActionKey points of Hyogo Framework for Action

Organizational, legal and policy framework

Risk identification, assessment, monitoring

Knowledge management, education

Reducing underlying factors

Preparedness for effective response and recovery

Create multi-sector national platforms• To provide policy guidance• To coordinate activities

Tools need to be developed• Risk maps• Risk indicators• Early warning

Develop community-based disaster risk management

• Formal/ informal education• Training activities

Mainstream disaster risk considerations into planning procedures

• Infrastructure• Natural resources

Strengthen policy, technical and institutional capacities

• Nation level• Local level

Page 8: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 8Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

The Japan Self Defense Force drilling enabled 30 minutes deployment

Source: Ministry of Defense; The Boston Consulting Group

The JSDF held its largest drill "Michinoku ALERT 2008"The JSDF held its largest drill "Michinoku ALERT 2008"

Drilldates

Oct 31 – Nov 1, 2008

HypothesisQuake approx magnitude 6 off Miyagi Pref coast, tsunami hits Sanriku coast

• Drill conducted in region badly affected by this disaster

Participants Total 18,000 participants in 22 towns in Iwate & Miyagi Pref, and 6 prefectures of Tohoku Region

• 9,839 SDF personnel

DrillDetails

In cooperation with local authorities, fire dept, residents, practiced life rescue and welfare support

• After the drill, held regular meetings between the city/town/village & the unit in charge during the drill

• Each time, they checked on communities at risk of isolation from a tsunami

Speedy expansion of rescue operationsSpeedy expansion of rescue operations

Ground JSDF No. 21 Infantry Regiment, stationed at Akita Garrison, arrived in Kamaishi City, Iwate Pref. approx 7:30am

• After establishing the ir base, they commenced rescue operations for Hakozaki Town, which was completely isolated due to roads being cut by the tsunami.

All debris was removed 2 days later, and emergency goods were delivered twice daily to the community

(15 mins )

F-15 fighters take-off from Hyakuri,Misawa& Komatsu bases

• six aircrafts

(25 mins )P-3C Patrolaircraft takes-off

• 1 aircraft

11 aircrafts responded within 30 mins after the disaster headquarters established11 aircrafts responded within 30 mins after the disaster headquarters established

March 112:46 2:50 3:01 3:05 3:15

Quake hits

Ministry

of

Defense

Ma

ritime

Gro

un

dA

ir

JSD

F

3:202:57

(7 mins )

UH-60 Rescue Helicopter takes-off from Ohminato

• 1 aircraft

(30 mins )

P-3C Patrol aircraft takes-off

• 1 aircraft

JSDF Disaster Response HQ established

(11 mins )

UH-1 Helicopter equipped with image transmission system takes-off

• 1 aircraft

(25 mins )

UH-1 takes-off

• 1 aircraft

Page 9: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 9Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

Agenda

■The Great East Japan Earthquake

■ It’s all about “boundaries”

■ Implications and our challenge

Page 10: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 10Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

It’s all about “boundaries”

1. Boundary between ministries and ministries

2. Boundary between public and private sector

3. Boundary between traditional media and social media

Source: The Boston Consulting Group, Japan PMO Office of Global Communications

Page 11: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 11Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

It’s all about “boundaries”

1. Boundary between ministries and ministries-Minimized range of voice.

-Shortened message development chain within PMO and dissemination to ministers.

-Formed Emergency team with advertising agencies to advice each ministries communications.

-Had daily message meeting to integrate as many touch points as possible.

PMO internal

Emergency adviser team with ad agencies PMO

Ministries

Shorten

Broaden

………Interaction

Page 12: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 12Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

It’s all about “boundaries”

2. Boundary between public and private sector

-Identify roles and responsibilities of each sector.

-Set up casual relationship to communicate.

-Frequent cross sector communication.

Google Person Finder• photos of evacuation center name

lists uploaded via Picasa• 320,000 postings were made within

1 week

Twitter hash-tags• call for help: #j_j_helpme• confirm safety: #anpi

Google Crisis Response traffic results map

• Roads where traffic successfully passed through the previousday were shown

Seven Eleven convenient stores• Outlets as wall paper distribution

Page 13: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 13Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

It’s all about “boundaries”

3. Boundary between traditional media and social media

-Feed back effect between traditional and social.

-In affected area, hard to secure stable internet access. Traditional need to complement.

-Shortened message development chain within PMO and dissemination to affected area.

-Utilized both public/private sector access to maximize reach.

-Leverage any traditional/social media and touch points.

Press conference of government staffs, Newspaper ad, radio, HP, Twitter, Facebook, community radio, wall paper……

.

Page 14: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 14Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

-

.

Wall paper in affected area

Page 15: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 15Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

-

.

Wall paper in affected area

Page 16: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 16Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

-

.

Wall paper in affected area

Page 17: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 17Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

-

.

Wall paper in affected area

Page 18: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 18Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

-

.

Wall paper in affected area

18

Page 19: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 19Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

Wall paper in affected area

19

陸前高田市仮設庁舎では、壁新聞の下に岩手県報も合わせて掲出していた(写真)。

Page 20: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 20Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

No magic. It’s all about “persistency”.

Wall paper in affected area

Page 21: OECD Workshop on Inter-Agency Crisis Management

Xxxxx-xx/Footer 21Office of Global Communications Prime Minister's Office

Key lessons from past tsunamis had been weathered away

Tsunami of similar proportion hit the Sanriku area in 1896 and 1933

Tsunami of similar proportion hit the Sanriku area in 1896 and 1933

...people in the Sanriku area built stone monuments to warn their descendants...

...people in the Sanriku area built stone monuments to warn their descendants...

...some people ignored those warnings and suffered from the tsunami

...some people ignored those warnings and suffered from the tsunami

Due to the rias coastal characteristics of the region, they have experienced tsunamis before•  1896   Meiji Sanriku Tsunami

– magnitude 8.5 earthquake– 22,066 fatalities– 8891 houses washed away

•1933   Showa Sanriku Great Tsunami

– magnitude   8.1 earthquake– 1522 fatalities– 4885 houses washed away

Ancestors erected stone monuments marking the point reached by the tsunami, engraved with the warning "Do not build homes below this point"

A high dwelling is peace and harmony for children and grandchildren. Remember the tsunami calamity. Do not build below this point

In 1896 and 1933, tsunami reached this area and the settlement was destroyed, only 2 survived in front, and 4 behind

Precaution is needed no matter how many years pass

People make decisions based on convenience and choose to ignore the lessons from the past.

• "Since fishing is my only means of earning a living, it would be too much trouble getting to and from work if I built my home on the hill"

• "I know the dangers of tsunami, but don't think one will come in my lifetime"

Homes built below the monument were washed away, and 304 people died.

Before & after the Showa Sanriku Great Tsunami

Miyako City, Iwate Prefecture Ofunato City, Iwate Prefecture

Source: "The Study of Mistakes, "Hatamura Institute for the Advancement of Technology; Tokyo University Earthquake Research Institute, The Boston Consulting Group