oecd test for schools pilot* *based on the pisa fairfax county public schools may 2013

33
OECD Test for Schools Pilot* *Based on the PISA FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS May 2013

Upload: tyson-ellingsworth

Post on 16-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

OECD Test for SchoolsPilot*

*Based on the PISA

FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS May 2013

OECD Test for Schools Pilot• 125 Schools in Canada, UK and US

including 10 schools from FCPS• 48 School Districts• 6 magnets, 6 charters and 1 private

school included• 7,400 students tested during May

and June 2012• 75 students per school targeted• Reading, Math, and Science are

assessed• Students also completed a

questionnaire about classroom management and relationships with teachers

2

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

PISA Sections

• Understanding Your School’s Results

• What Students at your School Know and Can Do in Reading, Mathematics and Science

• Student Engagement and the Learning Environment at your School in an International Perspective

• Your School Compared with Similar Schools in your Country

• Your School in an International Context

3

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

The Socio-Economic Background of Students in Participating FCPS Schools

Socio-economic advantage of students

La

ng

ley

Hig

h S

ch

oo

l

4Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

FCPS Schools Compared withSchools in 2009 PISA

5

500 is the US Mean

566 is the Shanghai Mean

Socio-economic advantage of studentsFai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

FCPS Schools Compared withSchools in 2009 PISA

6Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

575 is the Shanghai Mean

502 is the US Mean

300

400

500

600

700

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Mea

n sc

ore

on t

he P

ISA

mat

hem

atics

sca

le

Socio-economic background (ESCS)

Schools in the United States that participated in PISA 2009

MathematicsFairfax County Public Schools (2012)

Socio-economic advantage of students

487 is the US Mean

600 is the Shanghai Mean

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

FCPS Schools Compared withSchools in 2009 PISA

7Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

300

400

500

600

700

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Mea

n sc

ore

on t

he P

ISA

sci

ence

sca

le

Socio-economic background (ESCS)

Schools in the United States that participated in PISA 2009

ScienceFairfax County Public Schools (2012)

Socio-economic advantage of students

575 is the Shanghai Mean

502 is the US Mean

Reading

Levels Examples of 4C’s in each level

6 • Students can assimilate information from unfamiliar content area presented in atypical formats

5 • Students can find information in unfamiliar texts and infer which information is relevant

4 • Students can locate embedded information and construct meaning from linguistic nuances

3 • Students can integrate several parts of the text to identify a main idea

2 • Students can compare and contrast between texts and outside knowledge

1 • Student can locate pieces of information that is explicitly stated

Students Below Level 1Students Above Level 1

8

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

Reading by Proficiency Level

9

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

US--2009

FCPS--Pilot Average

Woodson HS

Thomas Jefferson HSST

Oakton HS

Mount Vernon HS

Lee HS

Langley HS

Herndon HS

Hayfield SS

Falls Church HS

Chantilly HS

Level1 Below Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

10

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

Oakton HS

Langley HS

Level1 Below Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6

What Does the Same MeanActually Mean?

Langley High School and Oakton High SchoolBoth Have a Mean Score of 543

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

Key: 1=Chantilly 2=Falls Church 3=Hayfield 4=Herndon 5=Mount Vernon6=Oakton 7=Lee 8=Thomas Jefferson 9=Woodson 10=Langley 11F

airf

ax C

ount

y P

ublic

Sch

ools

FCPS compared to other schools in US, Shanghai, and Mexico in Reading in PISA 2009

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

Key: 1=Chantilly 2=Falls Church 3=Hayfield 4=Herndon 5=Mount Vernon6=Oakton 7=Lee 8=Thomas Jefferson 9=Woodson 10=Langley 12F

airf

ax C

ount

y P

ublic

Sch

ools

FCPS compared to other schools in US, Shanghai, and Mexico in Mathematics in PISA 2009

Lan

gle

y H

igh

Sch

oo

l

Key: 1=Chantilly 2=Falls Church 3=Hayfield 4=Herndon 5=Mount Vernon6=Oakton 7=Lee 8=Thomas Jefferson 9=Woodson 10=Langley 13F

airf

ax C

ount

y P

ublic

Sch

ools

FCPS compared to other schools in US, Shanghai, and Mexico in Science in PISA 2009

Student Engagement and the Learning Environment in an International Perspective• The learning environment at your school and

other schools in the US– Disciplinary Climate– Teacher Student Relations

• Students’ reading habits and the relationship with the performance

• Students’ attitudes to mathematics and the relationship to performance– Motivation and Self Efficacy

• Students’ self belief and interest in science and the relationship with performance– Motivation and Self-Efficacy

14

15

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Disciplinary Climate at Falls Church HS

16

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Disciplinary Climate at Falls Church HS vs. Reading Performance

17

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Disciplinary Climate at Langley HS vs. Reading Performance

18

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Disciplinary Climate at Falls Church HS

19

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Disciplinary Climate at Langley HS

20

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Teacher-Student Relations atFalls Church HS

21

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Teacher-Student Relations atFalls Church HS

22

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Teacher-Student Relations at Langley HS

23

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Teacher-Student Relations at Langley HS

24

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Students Instrumental Motivation in Math at Falls Church HS

25

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Students Instrumental Motivation in Math at Langley HS

26

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Students Self-Efficacy in Math atFalls Church HS

27

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Students Self-Efficacy in Math at Langley HS

28

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Students Instrumental Motivation in Science at Falls Church HS

29

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Students Instrumental Motivation in Science at Langley HS

Teacher-Student Relations

30

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Reader Profiles at Falls Church HS

12

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

31

Other Data Available

• International and national comparisons

• Learning Environment and Teacher-Student Relationship

• Students’ reading habits• Students’ attitudes about

reading, math and science• Students’ self-belief and interest

in reading and science• Public vs. private schools• Boys and girls comparison in

reading, math, and science• Extensive policy research

32

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls

Next Steps for FCPS• Network with other schools in the US that

participated in the PISA pilot– America Achieves Event– EdLeader21

• Share the results with all FCPS schools – Pyramid Planning– Benchmarking against the best– Leadership Conference- Pasi Sahlberg– Division Strengths/Challenges

• Examine FCPS/VA/US policies to ensure they are supportive ofthe best conditions for learning

33

Fai

rfax

Cou

nty

Pub

lic S

choo

ls