oceanography of the ross sea: ocean ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...list of...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN CIRCULATION, SEA ICE, AND PHYTOPLANKTON
A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES
OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
Tasha Elise Reddy
June 2008
![Page 2: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
UMI Number: 3313648
Copyright 2008 by
Reddy, Tasha Elise
All rights reserved.
INFORMATION TO USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy
submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and
photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper
alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
®
UMI UMI Microform 3313648
Copyright 2008 by ProQuest LLC.
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest LLC 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway
PO Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346
![Page 3: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Copyright © 2008 by Tasha Elise Reddy
All Rights Reserved
11
![Page 4: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Kevin R. Arrigo, Principal Adviser
I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Oliver B. Fringes:
I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
)avid M. Holland
I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for die degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Adina Paytan I /
Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies.
@*z-f-. rf^ph-
in
![Page 5: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ABSTRACT
It is a crucial time to further our understanding of oceanographic systems, especially at
high latitudes, as these regions are expected to be the earliest and most susceptible sites of future
change. The Ross Sea, Antarctica, makes an ideal focus area, as its physical and biological systems
are well studied, but gaps in our knowledge still remain. To gain insight into the Ross Sea system,
I used a number of different methods, primarily targeting improved understanding of ocean
circulation in the region. These methods include analysis of ocean color satellite imagery, model
simulations of oceanic chlorofluorocarbons, and model simulations of sea ice involving the
formation and evolution of the Ross Sea polynya. The simulations are run with ocean circulation
models coupled to sea ice and glacier components with atmospheric forcing. I find that warm,
deep water comes from offshore onto the continental shelf as Modified Circumpolar Deep Water
(MCDW), retarding the growth of sea ice and also entering the Ross Ice Shelf (RIS) cavity where
it contributes to basal melting. The geostrophic nature of the flow on the shelf constrains the
movement of waters onshore and causes them to be tightly coupled to bathymetric features.
Offshore waters limit the extent of the phytoplankton bloom which is contrary to previous
suggestions that nutrient-rich MCDW mixes into the surface in the summer, enhancing the
bloom. There has been some controversy in the past as to the degree that different factors
contribute to the formation of the polynya in the Ross Sea. I find that winds play the dominant
role in its formation and there is a contribution from ocean heat. I additionally predict that basal
melting of the RIS is highest in the early spring and early autumn. Little is known about the
seasonal melting of the RIS, and this research helps create a clearer understanding of seasonally
changing mass-balance. The early spring melt can likely be attributed to warm MCDW entering
the RIS cavity year-round and then mixing into the surface waters during the winter. Finally, I
look at future change scenarios, completing 50-year coupled ocean, sea ice, atmosphere model
runs, studying sea ice concentrations and primary productivity under altered atmospheric forcing
of wind and air temperatures. In contrast to earlier findings that predict substantial changes, my
model runs estimate that in the next 50 years, sea ice concentrations and primary production in
the Ross Sea will change a relatively small amount. I find that under both temperature and wind
forcing scenarios, sea ice decreases in the summer and the winter, but does not disappear. This
does not eliminate the potential of a tipping point to occur after the 50-year run which could
result in a dramatically non-linear response of sea ice to altered atmospheric forcing. I find that
primary production changes in magnitude and timing in these scenarios, but does not change
significantly on average. This does not rule out that there may be plankton community shifts due
to changing physical conditions.
IV
![Page 6: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank my advisor, Kevin Arrigo, for many years of guidance and
inspiration while completing my degree. As a great researcher, teacher, and mentor, he has
helped me to develop into the scientist I am today. Additionally, Kevin has demonstrated how to
balance the successful management of a large research group with making time to spend outside
of the office with his family.
I would like to thank David Holland. It has been a pleasure to collaborate with him over
the years and I look forward to working with him in years to come. David has an admirable way
of making science fun and his enthusiasm for his own work, and science in general, is vast.
My two other committee members, Oliver Fringer and Adina Paytan, have also provided
inspiration to me during the completion of my graduate studies. Oliver, as a junior faculty
member, has been a role model to me as a young scientist. Adina, as the professor of many of my
courses, exudes scientific knowledge and wisdom. She is also an amazing example of how to
generously take time to reach out to the community and offer what she has as a scientist in order
to advance the development of the next generation.
And finally I thank my committee chair, Terry Root. I was very fortunate to meet Terry
during a Stanford short-course on Global Warming. Simply put, this was the best course that I've
ever participated in in my life. In one brief week, Terry provided me with lasting mentorship and
was an incredible role model as a woman in a senior faculty of science position.
For helpful discussions, comments, and advice in preparation of the manuscripts
presented within this thesis, I would like to again thank Kevin Arrigo, David Holland, and Oliver
Fringer, and additionally thank Derek Fong, Rochelle Labiosa, Steven Monismith, Stan Jacobs,
and William Smethie. I would also like to acknowledge the multiple anonymous reviewers and
editors for their valuable suggestions during the submissions of the manuscripts presented here.
![Page 7: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
I thank the graduate students of the ocean group at Stanford. Over the years they have
provided much support and camaraderie. In particular, I thank the members of the Arrigo
research group: Rochelle Labiosa, Lindsey Kropuenske, Gert van Dijken, Sudeshna Pabi, Mine
Berg, Anne-Carlijn Alderkamp, Ben Saenz, Matt Mills, Viola Toniolo, Molly Palmer, and Stuart
Borrett. I have very much enjoyed learning from and spending time with all of them during my
time at Stanford.
Finally I thank my family and friends, especially Lara, Erin, Matt, Brennan, Carol, Alexis,
Bohdan, Mike, Herb, Ayyana, Will, Kelly, Jason, Cat, Ryan, Courtney, Kamini, CJ, Steve, Martine,
Brad, Lindsey, Chi Soo, Eugene, Darcy, Rick, Nick, Brie, James, Malita, Jim, Phoebe, Anna, Thijs,
Matt, Eve, Jenny, Mine, Rochelle, Janine, Scott, Laura, Mike, Farshad, Tricia, Matt, Dave and
Dave, Sang-Ho, Charlie, Seth, Wendy, Sue, Kerry, Susan, Serkan, Laura, Jess, Peter, Stephen,
Philip, and William. Thank you Marge and grandma, and thank you Biggie for your guidance and
inspiration. I wish you could be here to witness my accomplishment and share in the celebration.
In particular, I thank my mother who has been a constant pillar of support for me, unwavering
over the years. I will forever be in debt to her for her love and patience. Most of all, I thank
Adam. Without him, I would not be who I am or where I am today. My life has presented me
with great challenges over the past few years, and Adam has been there for me at every turn along
the way. With all my heart, I thank him for being my best friend.
This work was supported by NASA Earth System Science Fellowship grant NGT5-
30489, Stanford University McGee grants, and Shell Foundation awards. Additional support
came from NASA, DOE, and NSF grants to Kevin Arrigo and David Holland.
V I
![Page 8: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES ix
LIST OF FIGURES x
CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1
CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross Sea Phytoplankton Bloom 6
Abstract 6
2.1 Introduction 7 2.1.1 Remote Sensing 11 2.1.2 Modeling 12
2.3 Results 13 2.4 Patterns in Chi and Mechanisms for their Formation 16 2.5 Advection via Ekman Layer, Tidal, and Geostrophic Flow 20 2.6 Conclusions 22
CHAPTER 3: The Role of Thermal and Mechanical Processes in the Formation of the Ross Sea Summer Polynya 24
Abstract 24 3.1 Introduction 25 3.2 Methods 28
3.2.1 Model Description 28 3.2.2 Control Run and Parameter Sensitivity 32 3.2.3 Model Configuration Sensitivity Runs 34
3.3 Results 37 3.3.1 Control Run 37 3.3.2 Sensitivity Studies 43
3.3.2.1 Sensitivity to Parameters Values 43 3.3.2.2 Sensitivity to Model Structure 43 3.3.2.3 Sensitivity to Ocean Heat 44 3.3.2.4 Sensitivity to Ice Advection 48 3.3.2.5 Sensitivity to Winds 49
3.4 Discussion 51 3.5 Conclusions 58
vn
![Page 9: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
CHAPTER 4: Ross Ice Shelf Cavity Circulation, Residence Time, and Melting: Results from a Model of Oceanic Chlorofiuorocarbons 59
Abstract 59 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Modeling Methods 63
4.2.1 Ocean Component 63 4.2.2 Sea-Ice and Ice Shelf Components 64 4.2.3 Atmosphere and CFC Gas Exchange 65 4.2.4 Model Grid and Runtime 67 4.2.5 Residence Time 68
4.3 Results and Discussion 68 4.3.1 Modeled CFC Distributions 68 4.3.2 Modeled Circulation, Salinity, and Temperature 72 4.3.3 Residence Time Estimates 76 4.3.4 Low-CFC Waters 76 4.3.5 Basal Melt Rates 79
4.4 Conclusions 81
CHAPTER 5: Ross Sea Primary Production and Sea Ice in Future Climatic Change Scenarios 83
Abstract 83 5.1 Introduction 84 5.2 Methods 86
5.2.1 The Physical Model 86 5.2.2 The Biological Model 88 5.2.3 Climate Change Scenarios 90
5.3 Results 93 5.3.1 Sea Ice 93 5.3.2 Ocean Temperatures 98 5.3.3 Primary Productivity 101 5.3.4 Sensitivity to the Magnitude of Changes 104
5.4 Discussion 107 5.4.1 Southern Ocean Sea Ice 107 5.4.2 Arctic and Antarctic Differences 109 5.4.3 Response of Biological Systems to Changes in Physical Systems I l l
5.5 Conclusions 114
CHAPTER 6: Conclusions 116
REFERENCES 120
viii
![Page 10: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Uncertain model parameters and coefficients used in sensitivity analyses 33
Table 3.2 Model configurations for sensitivity runs 34
Table 3.3 Model sensitivity analyses 36
Table 4.1 Chlorofluorocarbon descriptions 60
Table 4.2 Constants for the temperature dependent Schmidt number [Zheng 1998 (CFC-11 and CFC-12); Haine and Richards, 1995 (CFC-113)] and gas solubility [in units of pmol kg1 patnY1, Warner and Weiss 1985 (CFC-11 and CFC-12); Bu and Warner 1995 (CFC-113)] 67
Table 5.1 Comparison of peak daily, mean daily, and annual primary productio 101
IX
![Page 11: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2.1 (a) Map of the Antarctic coastline and 1000 m bathymetric contour with study region outlined in blue. A schematic of the Ross Sea Gyre is shown in green, (b) Bathymetry map for the study area also including Ross Sea Gyre circulation schematic (green). Purple line marks the boundaries of images displayed in Figure 2 7
Figure 2. 2 Satellite imagery of chlorophyll from December (a) 1978, (b)1998, (c) 1999, and (d) 2003, and (e) bathymetry. Areas of low chlorophyll associated with the bloom are indicated by white lines (1-3). Areas of high-chlorophyll waters between the jets of low-chlorophyll waters are labeled A through C. The labels are included on all images regardless of whether the feature is present or not during that year. Grey areas indicate sea ice and black regions represent areas of missing satellite ocean color data, most often due to cloud cover. Note that in 2003 (d), the western boundary of the bloom is located westward of the usual location (see text) 8
Figure 2.3 Instantaneous surface velocity streamlines overlain on bathymetry 13
Figure 2.4 Comparison of December chlorophyll distributions from (a) model results and (b) SeaWiFS imagery from 1998 14
Figure 2.5 Model results showing surface (a) salinity and (b) temperature and vertical profiles along a transect of 74.8°S of (c) salinity and (d) temperature 15
Figure 2.6 Modeled results for surface waters in December of (a) chlorophyll and (b) iron 18
Figure 2.7 Instantaneous surface velocity streamlines overlain on modeled surface density anomaly. 22
Figure 3.1 Map of the Antarctic coastline and the 1000 m bathymetric contour. The Ross Sea model domain perimeter is shown (heavy outline) as well as the perimeter for the model domain which excludes the Ross Ice Shelf (dashed line) 30
Figure 3. 2 Bathymetry (m) of the Ross Sea model domain which includes the Ross Ice Shelf cavity, the continental shelf and the abyssal ocean. Also shown are the three regions for which statistics were extracted 31
Figure 3.3 Sea ice concentrations from (a) satellite climatology (1987-1993) and (b) year 10 of the model control run 38
Figure 3.4 Sea-ice thicknesses from (a) June 1995 data (b) June 1998 data (c) June 1st
model control run (d) January 1999 data (e) January 2000 data (£) Feb 1st
x
![Page 12: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
model control run (sea-ice thickness data compiled by DeUberty and Geiger [2005]) 39
Figure 3. 5 Comparison of ice and snow thicknesses (a) from May/June 1995 field observations along transects between 160°W and 180° [Jeffries andAdolphs, 1997] and (b) from June of the 10th year of the model control run along a 180° transect (c) November 1998 field observations along a transect of approximately 175°E [Arrigo eta/., 2003] and (d) from November of the 10th
year of the model control run along a 175°E transect 41
Figure 3.6 Austral summer sea-ice concentrations of the 10th year of the model run from (a) model control run (in which the model domain excludes the cavity under the RIS) (b) no heat entrainment June - March (c) no heat entrainment December - March (d) no heat entrainment for the entire 10 year spin-up period (e) ice not moving June - March (f) no heat entrainment and ice not moving June - March (g) open water albedo feedback effect from June - March (h) no wind from June - March (i) no wind from December - March Q) no snow from June — March (k) no snow from December - March 45
Figure 3.7 Percent of time in November and December during which ice concentrations were greater than 10% (satellite data from 1997 - 2001). The position of the 1000m isobath is shown by the black line. [Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2004] 54
Figure 3.8 Modeled (a) vertical temperature profiles at 175°E and (b) sea surface temperatures over the model domain 56
Figure 4.1 Atmospheric CFC concentrations in the Southern Hemisphere of CFC-12, CFC-11, and CFC-113 from 1940 to 2000. [Walker et al. 2000] 61
Figure 4. 2 (a) Map of the Antarctic coastline and the 1000 m bathymetric contour. The Ross Sea model domain perimeter is shown, (b) Sampling locations of CFC field data along transect following the RIS edge [Smethie and Jacobs 2005] during Jan-Feb 1984, Feb 1994, and Feb-Mar 2000 62
Figure 4.3 CFC-12 concentrations [pmol kg"1] from (a) field studies along a transect following the ice shelf edge Jan-Feb 1984; Feb 1994; Feb-Mar 2000 [Smethie and Jacobs 2005] (b) model estimates along a transect of 77.3°S for equivalent model dates (c) model estimates for the ocean at 450 m depth surrounding the mouth of the cavity (d) model estimates for the ocean at 450 m depth (for the entire model domain) (e) model estimates for the ocean mixed layer (for the entire model domain) 70
Figure 4.4 CFC-12 [pmol kg"1] concentration model estimates in depth and time at a station 180°, 77.3°S for 1980 through 2000 71
XI
![Page 13: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Figure 4. 5 Modeled temperature and velocity (averaged over the final year of the model run) for (a) surface layer and (b) at 450m depth 72
Figure 4.6 Salinity from (a) field studies (along a transect following the ice shelf edge Jan-Feb 1984; Feb 1994; Feb-Mar 2000) and (b) model estimates (along a transect of 77.3°S for equivalent model dates) 74
Figure 4. 7 Temperature from (a) field studies (along a transect following the ice shelf edge Jan-Feb 1984; Feb 1994; Feb-Mar 2000) and (b) model estimates (along a transect of 77.3°S for equivalent model dates) (c) model estimates surrounding the mouth of the cavity 75
Figure 4.8 Distribution of RIS cavity "dye" in the mixed layer at the half-life of the dye in the cavity [%] 77
Figure 4.9 Modeled estimates of RIS basal melt rate [cm/a] (a) March (b) June (c) September (d) December 79
Figure 5.1 Increases in (a) temperatures and (b) winds over the 50 years of the model runs 92
Figure 5.2 Sea ice concentration (averaged over the model domain) for the 50 years of the model runs for (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run and (d) temperature+wind run 94
Figure 5.3.1 Sea Ice Concentrations (Tight grey is open water; dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run 95
Figure 5.4 Ocean mixed layer temperatures (dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run 99
Figure 5.5 Primary Production (dark grey is the continent) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run 102
Figure 5.6 Primary production time series 103
Figure 5.7 Model results from the low, intermediate, and high model scenarios for temperature and wind of (a) January sea ice concentrations (b) February ocean mixed layer temperatures and (c) December (peak) primary production (light grey is open water; dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS) 105
xn
![Page 14: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
CHAPTER 1 Introduction
Even the seemingly isolated waters of the Southern Ocean play a key role in the
carbon (C) cycle and affect climate on a global scale. The ocean is an important global C
reservoir that exchanges with the atmosphere at timescales on the order of one thousand
years [Sarmiento and I^eQuere, 1996], and the Southern Ocean accounts for a significant
amount of global carbon dioxide (CO^ sequestrationfGz/^/ra and Duffy, 2000].
Anthropogenic climate change affects the ocean-ice-atmospheric system, particularly at
high latitudes, and it is far from certain how the system will respond to global warming
and what feedbacks may develop in the future [Sarmiento et al, 1998]. One likely feedback
involves the alteration of C export to the deep ocean. Understanding present
mechanisms that are at work at regional scales as part of the ocean-ice-atmosphere system
is of particular importance if we hope to understand what factors may be important at
global scales in the future, as the Earth responds to warming.
In general phytoplankton chlorophyll concentrations are higher over the
continental shelves of the Southern Ocean than over the open ocean. The Ross Sea
polynya is the most productive region of the Southern Ocean (1.46 gC m 2 d"1 in January
and 151 gC m2 yr4 annual [Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2003]), an area that for the most part
has low productivity (4414 Tg C yr ! for all water south of 50°S, [Arrigo et al, 1998])
despite high levels of macronutrients (high nutrient low chlorophyll, or HNLC region).
Due to its high productivity and intense phytoplankton blooms, the Ross Sea polynya
supports a substantial food web base for higher trophic levels. Thus understanding the
1
![Page 15: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Ross Sea biological oceanographic system has widespread implications. There is a water
mass found at depth around Antarctica call Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW). It comes
onto the continental shelves (sometimes as Modified CDW (MCDW) or Upper CDW
(UCDW)) where it impacts biological and physical systems. Along the western Antarctic
Peninsula, nutrient-rich UCDW is known to supply nutrients to the surface waters and
enhance the phytoplankton bloom \Pre%elin et al, 2000]. The extent of phytoplankton
blooms, aside from being limited by nutrient availability and light availability, is affected
by ocean circulation as well as the presence of sea ice.
Sea ice limits the amount of light that enters the waters below, inhibiting a
phytoplankton bloom from forming when sea ice is present. In addition to affecting light
availability for phytoplankton, sea ice plays an important role in the physical
oceanographic system as a barrier to air-sea exchange of heat and gases, deep water
formation and deep mixing. Sea ice can be affected, among other things, by winds, ocean
heat, ocean currents, tides, and air temperatures. Aside from being the most productive
region of the Southern Ocean, the Ross Sea polynya is also the largest in the world \Arrigo
and Van Dijken, 2003] so it is important to understand how different factors affect its
formation.
Understanding the mass-balance of Antarctic ice shelves is in particularly key as
we continue in a world of unprecedented climatic change. While the ice shelves are
floating and do not contribute directly to sea level rise, they hold back continental ice
from flowing into the ocean. This ice can have a substantial impact on sea level. When
studying this mass balance, it is critical to quantify basal melting - melting along the base
of the ice shelf. Just as the Ross Sea polynya is the largest in the world, the cavity beneath
2
![Page 16: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
the Ross Ice Shelf (SIS) is the largest ice shelf cavity in the world. Relatively little is know
about the base of the RIS and die cavity below due to die difficulty in making direct
measurements in such a remote location, but understanding this system is becoming
increasingly important.
Atmospheric temperatures have been [Brohan et al, 2006] and will be [IPCC 2007]
increasing, resulting in widespread impacts on almost all earth systems. Changes are
expected to occur earliest and more intensely at the poles [Flato et al, 2000; Shindell et al,
1999; Stouffer et al, 1989]. The Arctic has already undergone significant change with
dramatic declines in sea ice in the last decade. Additionally, high latitude precipitation is
expected to increase [Groisman et al, 2005] and winds are expected to shift in location and
change in intensity \Russell et al, 2006]. In order to predict and prepare for changes that
may occur in the future, forecast models are necessary to simulate future conditions.
For this study, two different regional models of the Ross Sea were used. The
Coupled Ice Atmosphere Ocean (CIAO) model simulates the Ross Sea ecosystem \Arrigo
et al, 2003; Worthen et al, 2003]. The physics in CIAO are based the sigma-coordinate
Princeton Ocean Model (POM) \£>lumberg, 1987]. It was modified to include a primary
production algorithm and biological variables such as nutrients (NOs, Si, P0 4 , and Fe),
zooplankton, detritus, and phytoplankton taxonomic composition and abundance [Arrigo
2003a]. The CIAO model takes into account the different C to P nutrient removal ratios
of the two dominant phytoplankton taxa in the region, Phaeocystis antarctica and diatoms.
The second model used is the Polar Ocean Land Atmosphere Regional modeling system
(POLAIR) [Holland and Jenkins, 2001; Holland et al, 2003; Reddy et al, 2007]. The ocean
component is an isopycnic layer model, based on the Miami Isopycnic Coordinate Model
3
![Page 17: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
(MICOM) [Bleck and Smith, 1990], the sea ice component uses a cavitating fluid rheology,
and the simple atmospheric component uses daily forcings. The simulations incorporate
the cavity beneath the RIS. It has been modified as part of this dissertation to include a
biological component consisting of a phytoplankton growth model that includes nutrient
(Fe), phytoplankton (P. antarcticd), and detritus [Reddy andArrigo, in prep].
The focus of the research presented here is to understand the physical
oceanographic system and its impact on ecosystems in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. This
includes the circulation of ocean waters and the presence of sea ice, and thus, the
availability of sunlight for photosynthesis. In Chapter 2,1 document the existence of
large (100 km) features of high and low biomass regions in the phytoplankton bloom.
Chapter 2 has been published in tht Journal of Geophysical Research [Reddy andArrigo, 2006].
Chapter 3 documents processes that contribute to the formation of the Ross Sea polynya.
Specifically, we model the annual evolution of the polynya and analyze the response to
shutting down processes, one at a time, such as winds, tides, ocean currents, and ocean
heat. Chapter 3 has been published in the Journal of Geophysical Research [Reddy, Arrigo, and
Holland, 2007]. In Chapter 4, we us a model of oceanic chlorofluorocarbons to validate
estimates of circulation on the Ross Sea continental shelf and within the RIS cavity. We
then use this model to estimate the residence time of water within the RIS cavity as well
as the basal melt rates along the base of the RIS. Additionally, we use the modeled CFCs
to study the circulation of MCDW on the continental shelf. This chapter, Chapter 4, is
being submitted for publication to Limnology and Oceanography [Reddy, Holland, andArrigo, to
be submitted]. I also examine the potential changes to sea ice and primary production in
the future due to altered atmospheric forcing of wind and temperature. For the study in
4
![Page 18: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Chapter 5,1 modeled 50 year scenarios of the future with wind speeds 10%, 50% and
100% greater than the control and also with air temperature change increasing to between
1°C and 4.5°C in 50 years. The impact of these changes is analyzed for seasonal sea ice
concentrations and spring and summer primary productivity. Chapter 5 is in preparation
for submission to Journal of Geophysical Research [Reddy andA.rrigo, in prep].
5
![Page 19: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
CHAPTER 2 Constraints on the Extent of the Ross Sea Phytoplankton Bloom
Abstract
An intense phytoplankton bloom forms over the continental shelf in the Ross Sea,
Antarctica every spring as the sea ice retreats during the expansion of the Ross Sea polynya.
The extent of this bloom rarely covers the full area of the shelf for reasons that are not well
understood. One clue may be found in satellite imagery spanning the last twenty-five years
that shows frequently recurring, previously undescribed, large scale plumes of high-
chlorophyll water and jets of low-chlorophyll water demarking the northern boundary of the
spring phytoplankton bloom. The plumes, with horizontal length scales of 100 — 200 km,
appear at the same location each year. The spatial consistency of this pattern of jets and
plumes suggests regulation by forcing that does not vary from year to year, such as the
interaction between bathymetry and prevailing ocean currents. Here we present a modeling
study indicating that this pattern in the spring phytoplankton bloom is caused by intrusions
of offshore surface waters onto the continental shelf, guided by relatively deep polar shelf
bathymetry. Our study suggests that currents from the Ross Sea gyre follow along the shelf
break and prevent the phytoplankton bloom from extending further towards the edge of the
shelf, even when the waters there are ice free, perhaps because the offshore waters have low
iron concentrations. These results illustrate how phytoplankton distributions can be
constrained by the interaction of deep bathymetry and surface geostrophic currents along the
highly productive Antarctic continental shelf.
6
![Page 20: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2.1 Introduction
Phytoplankton chlorophyll a (Chi) concentrations in the Southern Ocean are
generally higher on continental shelves, likely due to the greater abundance of iron in
shallowwaters [Comiso eta/., 1993]. The Ross Sea continental shelf (Figure 2.1) is no
exception, containing some of the most biologically productive waters in Antarctica
[Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2003b]. Phytoplankton biomass often exceeds 10 mg Chi m~3
[Smith and Gordon, 1997] during intense spring phytoplankton blooms that form when
light availability in surface waters increases due to the expansion of the Ross Sea polynya
(an area of open water surrounded by sea ice).
While the extent of the sea ice is one factor constraining the ultimate size of the
phytoplankton bloom, even when the continental shelf is virtually ice free, the bloom
rarely extends to the outer reaches of the shelf. Furthermore, the extent of the bloom
can vary dramatically from year to year \Arrigo et a/., 1998; Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2004].
Figure 2.1 (a) Map of the Antarctic coastline and 1000 m bathymetric contour with study region outlined in blue. A schematic of the Ross Sea Gyre is shown in green, (b) Bathymetry map for the study area also including Ross Sea Gyre circulation schematic (green). Purple line marks the boundaries of images displayed in Figure 2.2.
7
![Page 21: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
170°E 175°E 180°E
-1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0
Figure 2.2 Satellite imagery of chlorophyll from December (a) 1978, (b)1998, (c) 1999, and (d) 2003, and (e) bathymetry. Areas of low chlorophyll associated with the bloom are indicated by white lines (1-3). Areas of high-chlorophyll waters between the jets of low-chlorophyll waters are labeled A through C. The labels are included on all images regardless of whether the feature is present or not during that year. Grey areas indicate sea ice and black regions represent areas of missing satellite ocean color data, most often due to cloud cover. Note that in 2003 (d), the western boundary of fhe bloom is located westward of the usual location (see text).
Clues to what is limiting the spatial
extent of the phytoplankton bloom
may be found in ocean color satellite
imagery of the region collected between
1978 and 2003 \Arrigo and Van Dijken,
2004; Arrigo eta/., 1998] which show
large plumes of high-Chl water (Figure
2.2, areas A through C) separated by
regions of low-Chl water (Figure 2.2:
lines 1 through 3) that develop during
the peak of the spring bloom. The area
of low-Chl along the northwestern
boundary of the bloom (line 1) is not
spatially fixed from year to year and
may be associated with the position of
8
![Page 22: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
the retreating ice edge, explaining its absence in 2003 (Figure 2.2d). The other two jets of
low-Chl (lines 2 and 3), however, are quite consistent from year to year. They flank both
sides of the Pennell Bank, suggesting a correlation between low surface Chi and deep
bathymetry. During years when bloom extent is larger than average, the eastern-most jet
of low Chi (line 3) does not appear. However, virtually every year that the southwestern
Ross Sea was ice free during spring (large blooms did not develop during some years
because of heavy sea ice due to icebergs or unusual climate conditions \Arrigo and Van
Dijken, 2003a; Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2004]), the center jet of low Chi (line 2) bordered by
two plumes of high Chi is spatially fixed and strikingly apparent in satellite imagery.
The formation of these mesoscale features is likely driven by surface circulation in
this region of the Southern Ocean. Circulation in the southwestern Ross Sea is
dominated by the swift surface-intensified slope current \Assmann eta/., 2003], the
southern part of the cyclonic (clockwise) Ross Sea Gyre that runs northwest along the
shelf break (Figure 2.1). Some of this water flows onto the Ross Sea continental shelf,
which averages approximately 600 m in depth but which has three shoals 300 m deep and
a steep shelf break (Figure 2.1). Previous modeling studies have found that the
circulation on the shelf is strongly affected by this irregular bottom topography [e.g.
Dinniman eta/., 2003].
There are a variety of ways in which relatively deep bathymetry can alter surface
circulation \Heath, 1981; Holland, 2001; Semtner and' Chervin, 1992] and affect
phytoplankton distributions. The most common mechanism is the topographically
enhanced entrainment of nutrients into surface waters and subsequent stimulation of
phytoplankton growth. This process has been observed in many locations, including the
9
![Page 23: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
western Antarctic Peninsula \Pre%elin et al, 2000], the Subtropical Convergence at
Chatham Rise [McClatchle et al, 1997], and upwelling filaments off of the coast of
California \Flament et al, 1985] and southwest Africa [Shillington et al, 1990]. However, the
upwelling of nutrients does not likely affect phytoplankton distributions in the Ross Sea,
as springtime nutrients (including micronutrients such as iron) are generally high on the
continental shelf due to convective overturning during winter. Another way that
phytoplankton distributions are affected by deep bathymetry is through lateral advection
of surface waters that are bathymetrically constrained to create heterogeneous patterns in
surface phytoplankton distributions. For example, Moore et al. [1993] observed a non-
upwelling, bathymetrically constrained, offshore-directed plume of high Chi near the
coast of New Zealand. However, there are few other examples of such features
occurring along non-upwelling coasts. Finally, the depth of the well-mixed surface layer
can be altered as it flows over irregular bathymetry [Stewart, 2004]. These changes in
mixed layer depth (MLD) can alter light availability, and consequently, phytoplankton
growth rates and abundance.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the physical processes that
control the size and shape of the phytoplankton bloom in the southwestern Ross Sea. In
particular, we were interested in whether the surface expression of the bloom is
bathymetrically constrained, and if so, by what mechanism. This was investigated using a
3-dimensional ocean ecosystem of the Ross Sea, specifically, the Coupled Ice,
Atmosphere, Ocean (CIAO) model \Arrigo et al, 2003; Worthen andArrigo, 2003]. This
model simulates phytoplankton dynamics as a function of seasonal changes in
temperature, light, and nutrient distributions, which are in turn controlled by patterns of
10
![Page 24: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
advection and vertical mixing. By determining the conditions under which CIAO could
accurately simulate the major distributional patterns of the phytoplankton bloom, we
were able to assess whether the observed mesoscale features form regularly due to
bathymetric control of either advective flow or mixed-layer depth. While the features
themselves are not likely to have a significant effect on carbon uptake or determine upper
trophic level foraging patterns, identifying the mechanisms of their formation will help us
understand how mesoscale physical oceanographic processes constrain phytoplankton
distributions on this highly productive continental shelf.
2.2 Methods
2.1.1 Remote Sensing
Spatial patterns in Chi were derived from Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor
(SeaWiFS 1997-2003) and Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS 1978-1981) satellite
imagery obtained from the Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services
Center (DAAC). We processed SeaWiFS data using the NASA SeaDAS image
processing software and the OC4v4 algorithm. CZCS pigment concentrations were
calculated using the standard algorithm of Gordon etal. [1983]. Despite heavy cloud cover
on average, clear images were obtained during ice free years with which to characterize
patterns of Chi and their relationship to bathymetry so that averaging over multiple days
was not necessary. Sea ice distributions were determined from daily Special Sensor
Microwave Imager (SSM/I) data available at the EOS Distributed Active Archive Center
(DAAC) at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado, Boulder,
CO.
11
![Page 25: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
2.1.2 Modeling
To investigate possible interactions between surface phytoplankton blooms and
bathymetry, we increased the horizontal resolution of CIAO, a complete description of
which can be found in Arrigo eta/. [2003] and Worthen andArrigo [2003], from 25 km to 8
km in the southwestern Ross Sea. The physics of CIAO are based on the Princeton
Ocean Model (POM), a primitive equation, sigma-coordinate ocean circulation model
[B/umberg and Me/lor, 1987] with vertical mixing calculated using the turbulence closure
scheme of Mel/or and Yamada [1982]. CIAO specifies daily sea ice concentration from a
20-year climatology derived from passive microwave satellite data to calculate surface heat
and salt fluxes.
The biological component of the model includes the two dominant
phytoplankton groups in the region (diatoms and Phaeocystis antarcticd), macronutrients
(silicate, phosphate, and nitrate), the micronutrient iron (Fe), zooplankton, and detritus.
The Fe cycle used in this version of the model is simple and includes neither
photochemistry of Fe nor scavenging of Fe by particles, but still captures first order
dynamics of this essential micronutrient through remineralization, mixing, and advection
[Worthen andArrigo, 2003]. Remineralization of detritus is a source of dissolved Fe, and
there is weak restoring of Fe in the bottom layer of the model which simulates a
sedimentary flux of Fe. Phytoplankton growth rate is computed as a function of
temperature, light, and nutrient concentration.
Using climatological data sets as described by Arrigo et a/. [2003], the model was
spun up for three years and then run for one year to simulate the bloom over an average
annual cycle. The model is able to accurately simulate the temporal and spatial evolution
of two well understood phytoplankton blooms that occur annually in the Ross Sea
12
![Page 26: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
polynya. The progression of the blooms and the magnitude of primary production are in
excellent agreement with both in situ observations and satellite ocean color data \Arrigo et
al, 2003; Worthen andArrigo, 2003].
2.3 Results
As described previously, the Chi distributions in the Ross Sea during the spring
phytoplankton bloom appear to be related to the bathymetry on the continental shelf, 300
- 600 m below the surface (Figure 2.2). The regions of low Chi (Figure 2.2e: lines 1
through 3) run parallel to the bathymetry contours of the troughs between the banks, but
are actually neither in the troughs nor on the shoals. Line 1 (Figure 2.1) runs down the
center of Mawson Bank and lines 2 and 3 border the largest shoal on the shelf, the
Pennell Bank.
Modeled surface velocities exhibit flow almost parallel to bathymetric contours,
both along the continental shelf break and on the shelf (Figure 2.3). Currents along the
170°E 180°
72°S
74°S
76°S
-1000 -800 -600 -400 -200 0
Figure 2.3 Instantaneous surface velocity streamlines overlain on bathymetry.
13
![Page 27: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
shelf break move at approximately 0.1 m s"1, similar to flow estimates from previous
modeling studies \Assmann et al., 2003; Van Woert et al., 2003; Dinniman et al, 2003]. Our
results suggest that jets of oceanic water move onshore on both sides of the Pennell bank
and along the center of the Mawson Bank while offshore flow occurs along the canyon
between Mawson and Pennell banks. Although most previous modeling studies \Assmann
et al, 2003; Van Woert et al, 2003] were too coarse to resolve features in the circulation on
the shelf at a resolution suitable for the purpose of this investigation, our results agree
with circulation patterns derived from a higher resolution study \Dinniman et al., 2003]
showing onshore flow at 300 m depth flanking both sides of the Pennell Bank. Also
consistent with our findings is the observation that an influx of water from offshore may
be concentrated along the western flanks of the submarine banks on the shelf \Hofmann
andKJinck, 1998]. Current patterns predicted by CIAO are consistent with the few
measurements that are available, including long-term current meter observations of
northwest flow along the shelf break of 6.4 cm sA at 230m over a duration of 399 days
and one observation on the shelf at 230 m with velocities of <1 cm s"1 [Picco eta/., 1999 in
(a) 170°E 175°E 180°E (b) 170°E 175°E 180°E mw
Figure 2.4 Comparison of December chlorophyll distributions from (a) model results and (b) SeaWiFS imagery from 1998.
14
![Page 28: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Dinniman etal., 2003]. Locamini [1994] used current meter measurements on the Ross Sea
continental shelf between 250 m and 450 m to identify a northward flow along the
western side of the shelf (near 170°E) as well as in the central shelf region (near 175°W),
in agreement with our model results. Unfortunately, their data are very sparse and
observations were not available near the shoals. A study of sea ice trajectories
(determined by tracking ice floes over time) show ice in the northwest area of the shelf
moving in a northward direction \Arrigo etal, 1998], consistent with our modeled
circulation patterns.
(a) (b) 170°E 175°E 180°E 170°E 175°E 180°E
33 33.2 33.4 33.6 33.8 34 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Figure 2.5 Model results showing surface (a) salinity and (b) temperature and vertical profiles along a transect of 74.8°S of (c) salinity and (d) temperature
15
![Page 29: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The model predicts plumes of high and low-Chl waters (Figure 2.4a) that
correspond remarkably well to the high and low-Chl waters seen in satellite imagery
(Figure 2.4b). Although the horizontal extent and Chi concentrations of the modeled
bloom are greater than the bloom observed most years in the satellite imagery, the model
is able to capture the two areas of low Chi on the west side of the shelf (Figure 2.4a: lines
1 and 2). Surface salinity and temperature predicted by the model (Figure 2.5a and 2.b)
also exhibit alternating patterns of high and low values similar to that of Chi. Specifically,
areas of reduced salinity and temperature correspond to regions of low Chi. This pattern
was most pronounced in the salinity distributions (Figure 2.5a), which is not surprising
considering that density differences in polar waters are more strongly influenced by
salinity than by temperature. Vertical profiles of temperature and salinity (Figure 2.5c and
d) show that the horizontal patterns of these two properties in the surface plots are
restricted to water masses isolated above the pycnocline.
2.4 Patterns in Chi and Mechanisms for their Formation
Two mechanisms by which deep bathymetry can affect phytoplankton
distributions in surface waters, aside from facilitating the upwelling of nutrients, a process
not likely to be important in the high nutrient Ross Sea, include alteration of MLD and
modification of surface advection patterns. MLD can be altered when stratified waters
flow over irregular bottom topography. If the flow velocity over bottom topography is
subcritical (slower than the speed at which waves travel), the pycnocline will be displaced
upward and MLD will decrease. If the flow is supercritical (faster than the speed at
which waves travel), the pycnocline will be displaced downward and MLD will micken.
The location of the deepening or shoaling relative to the topography in each of these
16
![Page 30: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
cases is impacted by local Coriolis strength. In areas where MLD has deepened,
phytoplankton are mixed out of the euphoric zone and bloom formation is inhibited. A
shallower MLD is often characterized by higher mean light levels, enhanced
phytoplankton growth, and higher Chi concentrations. Changes to MLD through this
mechanism can be substantial in a stratified oceanic environment where the interface
between the two internal layers of different densities can be depressed or raised to a
much greater extent than the sea surface [Stewart, 2004].
If this process were important in the Ross Sea, we would expect to see a shoaling
or deepening of the mixed layer associated with the stratified flow over the three large
banks on the continental shelf (Figure 2.1). Depth profiles of temperature and salinity
from CIAO (Figure 2.5c and 2.5d) reveal that the pycnocline remains relatively uniform
over the shoals, ranging from 10-30 m. Furthermore, waters on the Ross Sea continental
shelf are generally weakly stratified \Arrigo et a/., 1998; Arrigo et al, 2000], rendering it less
likely that stratified flow could alter the mixed layer enough to affect phytoplankton
growth. This indicates that stratified flow over the shoals is not markedly altering the
depth of the pycnocline to create the patterns in Chi, salinity, and temperature, either in
the model or in nature.
Model results suggest instead that the surface patterns in Chi are caused by
horizontal advection of different surface water masses, as revealed by vertical profiles of
temperature and salinity above the pycnocline (Figures 2.5c and 2.5d). Waters with low
Chi are associated with distinct water masses having low salinity and temperature (Figure
2.5) that advect in from northeast of the continental shelf. Modeled instantaneous
horizontal surface velocities (Figure 2.4a) give further indication that the patterns of high
17
![Page 31: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
and low Chi are caused by horizontal advection. The surface velocities show that
onshore transport of oceanic waters are bathymetrically constrained to the troughs in
between the shoals (Figure 2.3). This pattern of modeled surface velocity persists
throughout December and January. Velocities along the shelf break are approximately 10
cm s"1, onshore velocities between the shoals are approximately 4 cm s"1, and offshore
velocities are approximately 2 cm s"1.
Chi concentrations in offshore waters that advect onto the shelf in association
with the jets are most likely low because these waters have not been ice-free long enough
for a bloom to form. As the temperature and salinity characteristics of waters within the
jets shows (relatively cold and fresh relative to surrounding waters, Figure 2.5), these jets
advected onto the shelf from regions that had recently been ice covered. Because the
lack of light in ice-covered waters reduces phytoplankton growth rates dramatically, these
newly ice-free source waters for the jets (such as along line 2 in Figure 2.4) have Chi
concentrations of only approximately 0.2 mg m"3. Given phytoplankton growth rates at
0°C of 0.2 d"1 in open waters of the Ross Sea, it would take approximately 30 days to
(a) 170°E 175°E 180°E (b) 170°E 175°E 180°E
Figure 2.6 Modeled results for surface waters in December of (a) chlorophyll and (b) iron.
18
![Page 32: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
reach biomass levels characteristic of the surrounding high Chi waters within the bloom.
This is longer than the approximately 17 days that it takes for the jets to move from
offshore into the bloom. Thus, there is insufficient time for phytoplankton abundance
within the jet to reach concentrations characteristic of surrounding waters.
Low iron concentrations in the waters being entrained into the plume from
offshore may also play a role in maintaining the persistently low Chi concentrations
within the dominant jet (line 2). Results from CIAO show that iron concentrations in
December are low (below growth-limiting levels for phytoplankton) both within this jet
and in the offshore waters entrained into it (Figure 2.6: line 2). In situ iron
concentrations measured throughout the southwestern Ross Sea support the idea of iron
limitation within offshore source waters for the jets. Although iron abundance in surface
waters on the Ross Sea continental shelf before the spring bloom is relatively high (0.1 -
0.4 nM), concentrations decrease markedly northward, falling to 0.025 nM (in mid
summer) at the edge of the continental shelf and to <0.05 nM (year-round) in the
Antarctic Circumpolar Current [Coak et al, 2005]. However, it should be noted that iron
concentrations in seawater and particularly in ice and snow are still not well known and
have been parameterized in CIAO based on only a limited number of samples from the
Ross Sea [Coak et al, 2005; Edwards and Sedmck, 2001]. More in situ data are needed to
firmly establish surface Fe concentrations in the Ross Sea and to ensure that iron
concentrations are being properly represented in non-shelf waters within CIAO.
If the areas of reduced Chi concentration within the phytoplankton bloom result
from the advection of offshore waters low in Chi into the bloom, this may explain why
the easternmost jet of low-Chl water (Figure 2.2: line 3) is less pronounced during years
19
![Page 33: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
when the phytoplankton bloom is more extensive (Figures 2.2a-c) and why it is not well
represented by CIAO (Figure 2.4a: line 3). Unlike the dominant low-Chl jet (line 2.2),
which is formed from the southwestward flow of mostly non-shelf waters onto the
continental shelf (Figure 2.3), much of water forming the easternmost jet of low Chi
water originates on the shelf, flows northward toward the shelf break, then turns back
toward the southwest before forming the jet and into the bloom (Figure 2.3: line 3).
During years when the bloom is more extensive (e.g. 1978 and to a lesser extent, 1998,
Figures 2.2a and 2.2b), waters on the shelf where the jet originates will have a high Chi
content. Consequently, although this northward flow entrains some low-Chl offshore
water before moving back onto the shelf, the jet is much less pronounced than in years
when the bloom on the shelf is less extensive (Figure 2.2c).
2.5 Advection via Ekman Layer, Tidal, and Geostrophic Flow
Having determined that horizontal advection controls phytoplankton
distributions in the Ross Sea, we next consider which of a number of different advective
processes (surface Ekman dynamics, tides, and geostrophy) could respond to bathymetric
features hundreds of meters below and may be responsible for the patterns of advection
seen in surface waters. On low-latitude continental shelves, phytoplankton blooms are
often affected by the relatively shallow bathymetry through turbulent mixing to the sea
floor [Lucas and Cloern, 2002] or topographically induced eddies bringing nutrients into the
euphotic zone [Roman eta/., 2005]. However, Antarctic continental shelves are deep
compared to low latitude shelves (typically hundred of meters versus tens of meters
respectively), and these processes are likely to be of little importance.
20
![Page 34: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Surface circulation is most directly affected by wind stress creating flow in die
surface Ekman layer, but this type of flow is unlikely to form consistent patterns in
surface circulation related to bathymetry on the Ross Sea continental shelf. Winds
blowing on the sea surface produce a thin boundary layer which is at most a few-hundred
m thick, but usually only 5-30 m thick [Stewart, 2004]. Surface Ekman layer flow does not
extend to the ocean floor in the Ross Sea, and cannot connect surface circulation to deep
bathymetric features.
Tidal models \Padman et al, 2003] predict that tidal currents are generally strong in
the southwestern Ross Sea, particularly over the shoals on the continental shelf.
Furthermore, tidally driven flow is spatially consistent over these features from year to
year. Nevertheless, model results rule out tides as a first-order factor in the formation of
these jets and plumes, as these features appear in the model results when tidal forcing is
excluded. Additionally, tidal current ellipses [MacAyeal, 1984] are on the order of 10 to
100 times smaller than the mesoscale patterns observed in the phytoplankton bloom.
There is no obvious mechanism by which tidal flow, circling around in these small-scale
tidal ellipses, could create the observed patterns in the bloom through advection alone.
We conclude then that the plumes of water observed in the model output and in
the satellite imagery are caused by geostrophic flow, whereby fluid motions are
maintained as a result of near balance between the Coriolis effect and gravity-induced
horizontal pressure gradient forces. This conclusion is based on the previously described
relationship between surface advection and the shoals on the continental shelf, as well as
velocity streamlines that are nearly parallel to isopycnal contours (Figure 2.7), a
characteristic of flow in geostrophic balance. Furthermore, polar regions experience
21
![Page 35: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
170°E 175°E 180°E
Figure 2.7 Instantaneous surface velocity streamlines overlain on modeled surface density anomaly.
strong rotation due to their high latitudes and are strongly influenced by geostrophic
flow. Consistent with this, currents in the Ross Sea study region are dominated by
geostrophic flow, with well documented evidence of this flow apparent in geologic
features from the Ross Sea upper slope [Anderson eta/., 1984]. This type of flow extends
deep into the water column and tends to move around obstacles such as shoals, instead
of over them, connecting deep bathymetric features to surface waters above.
2.6 Conclusions
Previous studies provide evidence that annual production in the southwestern
Ross Sea is limited by iron availability [Cochlan et a/., 2002; Olson et a/., 2000; Arrigo et a/.,
2003]. In the present investigation we extend these studies to show that the horizontal
distribution of high productivity water is most likely constrained by geostrophic surface
currents that continually move waters low in Chi, and most likely, iron, both along the
shelf break and onto the shelf. Interannual variation in the size of the maximum
22
![Page 36: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
phytoplankton bloom in the Ross Sea during years of normal sea ice cover may be the
result of annual differences in the balance between the strength of geostrophic circulation
along the shelf break, and upward mixing of iron from deeper waters on the shelf.
Reduced flow within die southwestern leg of the Ross Sea gyre or more intense vertical
mixing in winter in some years may allow the phytoplankton bloom to extend further
toward the continental shelf break.
This study also gives some insight into questions regarding the importance of
Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) moving onto the Ross Sea continental shelf as a source
of nutrients for the spring phytoplankton bloom. Studies on the west Antarctic Peninsula
continental shelf have shown that topographically induced upwelling at shallow locations
near the shelf break brings nutrient-rich CDW into the euphoric zone and increases
biological activity [Pre^e/in eta/., 2000]. Dinniman etal. [2003] have suggested that similar
processes may be important in the Ross Sea. Warm CDW upwelling onto the Ross Sea
continental shelf has been proposed to contribute to the formation of the seasonal
polynya [Jacobs and Comiso, 1989], but there remains litde evidence that this water mass is
entrained into surface waters during the summer or is biologically significant. In fact,
CIAO results presented here suggest that on die shelf and across the shelf break, there is
a reorganization of surface flow as opposed to the entrainment of intermediate waters
into the surface. While prior studies suggested that deep offshore water enhances
biological activity in the Ross Sea polynya, we suggest alternately that in some regions, the
offshore surface waters moving onto the shelf are inhibiting phytoplankton growth.
23
![Page 37: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CHAPTER 3 The Role of Thermal and Mechanical Processes in the Formation of the Ross Sea Summer Polynya
Abstract
Three decades of satellite observations collected during spring and early summer
have shown a recurring region of ice-free water forming in the sea-ice cover of the Ross Sea,
Antarctica. This Ross Sea summer polynya plays an important role in heat exchange between
the ocean and atmosphere, ventilation of deep water, and is characterized by high biological
productivity. Despite its appearance each year, the relative importance of different physical
processes to its formation and maintenance are not widely agreed upon. Here we use a three-
dimensional coupled ice/ocean model to better understand processes controlling the
dynamics of the Ross Sea polynya. Results from the model control run agree favorably with
satellite microwave imagery of sea ice. Model sensitivity studies suggest that polynya
dynamics are insensitive to the amount of snowfall, the presence of the Ross Ice Shelf cavity,
tides, and solar radiation penetrating the ice. The model results also corroborate earlier
findings that both the advection of sea ice and heat entrainment from warm Modified
Circumpolar Deep Water play a role in Ross Sea polynya development. More importantly,
the model further demonstrates that advection of sea ice due to wind stress plays the primary
role in summer polynya formation. Additionally, we suggest that 1) heat entrainment reduces
the rate of sea ice formation rather than melts existing sea ice, and 2) advection of sea ice due
to synoptic wind events associated with variations in atmospheric pressure are the processes
primarily responsible for the formation and expansion of the Ross Sea summer polynya.
24
![Page 38: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
3.1 Introduction
Because polynyas are areas of open water in regions otherwise covered by sea ice,
they have profound influences on the physics, chemistry, and biology of the waters in
which they are formed. They are sites of enhanced exchange of both heat [Dare and
Atkinson, 2000] and gases [Sweeney et al, 2000] between the ocean and the atmosphere.
While ocean-atmosphere heat transfer is especially high in winter due to the large air-sea
temperature gradient and higher wind speeds [Roberts et al, 2001], exchange of gases such
as carbon dioxide, oxygen, and dimethylsulfide are greatest in summer and autumn due to
enhanced biological activity [Arrigo et al, 1999; 'bates et al, 1998]. Due to the increased
availability of light in nutrient-rich waters not covered by ice, polynyas are often sites of
high primary and secondary production [Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2003; Reddy and Arrigo,
2006] which supports large populations of fish, benthic communities, mammals, and
birds [Ackley et al, 2003; Ainky et al, 1978; Ainley et al, 2005; Aoyanagi and Ueda, 1989;
Clarke and Johnston, 2003; Court et al, 1997; Dewitt, 1970; Erickson et al, 1971; Polito et al,
2002]. Additionally, the brine rejected as sea ice freezes in many coastal polynyas affects
the density of regional water masses [Bindoffet al, 2001; Buffoni et al, 2002; Zwally et al,
1985], vertical mixing, and modifies circulation on a global scale [Gordon and Comiso, 1988;
Grigg andHolbrook, 2001]. Although it varies interannually in extent and shape, the Ross
Sea polynya is the largest (~400,000 km2 in the summer) and most biologically productive
(100-200 g C m 2 yr4) polynya in the world [Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2003].
Past field and modeling studies of polynya dynamics \Bromwich and Kurt^ 1984;
Bromwich et al, 1993; Darby et al, 1995; Gallee, 1997; Gordon et al, 2000; Pease, 1987; Van
Woert, 1999; Wu et al, 2003; Bromwich et al, 1998; 1997] have focused primarily on winter
25
![Page 39: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
polynyas because their impact on ocean circulation and ocean-atmosphere heat exchange
is greatest at this time of year and because environmental conditions in the winter are
simpler to model (shortwave radiation does not need to be accounted for in winter
months) \Bromwich eta/., 2001]. However, the importance of the springtime expansion of
these polynyas, driven by winds and open water-albedo feedback during periods of
increased solar radiation \Hunke andAckley, 2001; Ohshima andNihashi, 2005], are recently
receiving more attention \Brommch eta/., 2001] due to their large surface area for gas and
heat exchange and greater light availability for phytoplankton production. In this study,
we will refer to the larger area of open water in the spring and summer as a summer
polynya \Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2003; Maqueda eta/., 2004; Smith and Gordon, 1997;
Bromwich eta/., 2001].
Polynyas are formed by thermal and mechanical processes and have been
categorized as either sensible heat or latent heat polynyas, respectively. Thermally-driven
polynyas form when oceanic heat flux is sufficient to melt existing sea ice, prevent
formation of new ice, or slow the rate of ice accretion so that wind-driven advection or
increased solar radiation can more easily reduce local sea ice concentrations. Latent heat
polynyas generally form in areas where winds blow sea ice offshore to produce a region
of open water near the coast, with the maximum polynya size being a function of air
temperature [Pease, 1987] and wind speed. New sea ice continually forms in this open
water, releasing latent heat as it freezes, and is subsequently blown offshore. Thus, latent
heat polynyas are not actually formed by the release of latent heat, but rather, are formed
due to mechanical processes such as katabatic or synoptic winds moving sea ice out of a
region [Maqueda eta/., 2004; Bromwich et a/., 1998]. Due to the confusing nomenclature, we
26
![Page 40: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
will refer to polynyas here as being either thermally- or mechanically-driven. It should be
noted, however, that most polynyas are thought to be formed by a combination of both
thermal and mechanical processes [Smith etal., 1990].
There has been debate in the literature about the relative role that thermal and
mechanical processes play in the rapid springtime expansion of the Ross Sea polynya.
Although it has been considered primarily to be a wind-driven polynya \Zwally et al,
1985], the Ross Sea polynya may be, at least in part, thermally driven {Jacobs and Comiso,
1989]. The likely oceanic heat source is the relatively warm Modified Circumpolar Deep
Water (MCDW) that is transported southward onto the continental shelf and is entrained
into the surface layer during winter mixing \Dinniman et al, 2003; Gordon et al, 2000; Arrigo
and Van Dijken, 2004; Jacobs and Comiso, 1989]. This additional heat reduces the rate of sea
ice growth, resulting in an ice pack with reduced sea ice concentrations and thickness,
thereby facilitating polynya formation. However, because most previous studies have
focused on the Ross Sea polynya during winter months, less is known about the factors
that drive the formation of the summer polynya. To assess the relative roles of thermal
and mechanical processes in the formation and maintenance of the Ross Sea summer
polynya, we present results from a three-dimensional regional modeling study focusing on
the expansion of the polynya during the spring and summer months. We used a coupled
sea-ice/ocean model to investigate the relative role of winds, sensible heat flux, ocean
currents, the Ross Ice Shelf (RIS) cavity, tides, snowfall, and solar radiation in the
formation and maintenance of the polynya. By comparing results from the numerical
model to satellite-derived sea-ice concentrations and field measurements of ice and snow
thickness, we were able to assess the factors that drive the regular formation of the Ross
27
![Page 41: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Sea polynya and determine the relative contributions by mechanical and thermal
processes.
3.2 Methods
3.2.1 Model Description
The Ross Sea polynya was modeled using the Polar Ocean Land Atmosphere and
Ice Regional (POLAIR) modeling system {Holland and Jenkins, 2001; Holland et al., 2003].
The model contains components representing ocean circulation, land margins (including
coastlines and rivers, if applicable), a simple atmosphere (which calculates radiation fluxes
and specifies temperature and pressure from observational data), and sea-ice
thermodynamics-dynamics. The ocean circulation component of the model is an
isopycnic, primitive equation code modified from the Miami Isopycnic Coordinate Ocean
Model (MICOM) [Bleck and Smith, 1990]. The ocean model includes parameterizations
that allow for strong lateral mixing along isopycnic layers as well as weak diapycnic
mixing between vertically adjacent isopycnic layers. These parameterizations mimic, to a
large extent, the observed mixing behavior in the real ocean. The sea-ice component uses
a two-thickness category approach, one category consisting of sea ice of a mean thickness
and the other representing leads between ice floes. Treatment of ice-ice interactions is via
a cavitating-fluid rheology \Flato and Hibler, 1992] in which the ice pack is resistant to
convergence but not divergence. Sea-ice concentration and thickness are computed by
accounting for the divergence of heat and freshwater fluxes at the interfaces between the
sea-ice and other model components (ocean and atmosphere). In many ways, the sea ice
is modeled as an "isopycnic" fluid layer, just as the ocean is, but with different stress
properties [Holland and Jenkins, 2001]. The equations governing sea ice are as follows:
28
![Page 42: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
^ + V ^ + ( / + 6)*xv /+VM, = {Tia r*>+lv<<frVv,) (1)
dt ^ + V.(vA) = V . « V ^ ) + 3/" (2)
V.(v/C,) = V.(* /cVC /) + 3f (3)
a/ where v; is the horizontal velocity vector, / is the Coriolis parameter, 4 is the relative
vorticity, "• is the vertical unit vector, Mt is the Montgomery potential, xia is the wind
induced sea ice surface shear stress vector, xoi is the analogous sea ice bottom-drag stress
vector, PJ is the density of the ice, ht is ice thickness, ' is the eddy viscosity, ' and '
are the eddy diffusivities, Cf is the concentration and ' and ' are the sum of all
thermodynamic forcing on the thickness and concentrations fields, respectively. See
Holland et al. [1993] and Holland [1998] for a complete discussion of ice thermodynamics.
Each grid cell has a computed ice concentration which is defined as the fraction (0 to 1)
of the grid cell which covered by sea ice. The remaining fraction of the grid cell is
defined to be the areal fraction of leads (open water). A viscous-sublayer
parameterization [Holland and Jenkins, 1999] describes thermodynamic interactions at the
interface between the ice shelf base and ocean surface as well at the sea-ice - ocean
interface. The ocean model has been modified to incorporate the arbitrary surface
topography of an ice shelf base [Holland and Jenkins, 2001]. The ocean cavity below the
RIS is modeled as described by Holland et al. [2003]. Tides are simulated using local non-
equilibrium tidal forcing generated by the Circum-Antarctic Tidal Simulation (CATS)
model {Robertson et al, 1998]. Snow accumulates on the sea ice and visible solar radiation
penetrates through snow and ice according to Beer's law such that:
29
![Page 43: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
HT ^ ^-d_icezice 0 ^-d_snowzsnow /r\
where T is the fraction of incident light that is transmitted through the snow and ice, KdJa
and jK^^are the attenuation coefficients for ice (1.4 m4) and for snow (12 m"1),
respectively, and %f«and Zm» are the thicknesses of the ice and snow, respectively, in each
grid cell. The model grid is based on a Mercator projection and all grid cells are rendered
to be locally square. Moving southward in the model domain, grid cells become smaller
in proportion to the cosine of the latitude. For the control model run and most
experimental runs, the average horizontal grid box size in the middle of the Ross Sea
continental shelf is approximately 70 km. The model domain is comprised of 40 grid
cells in the longitudinal direction from 140°E to 120°W and 33 grid cells in the latitudinal
direction from 60°S to 85°S (Figure 3.1). This domain includes the Ross Sea continental
shelf, the deep ocean, as well as the cavity beneath the RIS (Figure 3.2).
Figure 3.1 Map of the Antarctic coastline and the 1000 m bathymetric contour. The Ross Sea model domain perimeter is shown (heavy outline) as well as the perimeter for the model domain which excludes the Ross Ice Shelf (dashed line).
30
![Page 44: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
60°S
66°S
<u •u 3 72°S
78°S
84°S
140°E 160°E 180" 160°W 140°W 120°W
-4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0
Figure 3.2 Bathymetry (m) of the Ross Sea model domain which includes the Ross Ice Shelf cavity, the continental shelf and the abyssal ocean. Also shown are the three regions for which statistics were extracted.
Datasets defining the surface of the sub-ice shelf cavity, sea floor, and initial
density structure of the model ocean are described by Holland et al. [2003]. NCEP
reanalysis products [Kahay et al, 1996] for air temperature and sea-level pressure are used
as atmospheric forcing. The model computes geostrophic winds by computing the
horizontal gradient of daily sea-level pressure. In the absence of a robust dataset for
humidity, a value of 0.90 was used by the model to capture relative humidity over the
ocean. In lieu of a dataset quantifying cloud cover over sea ice, a constant cloud cover of
0.85 was used for the region, based on average cloud cover from climatology. Snow
thickness is derived from a global precipitation climatology [Legates and Willmott, 1990]
where precipitation over sea ice increases snow thickness based on the density of snow
(300 kg m3). Snow thickness can decrease through melting, sublimation, or when snow is
transformed into sea ice. The latter occurs when there is sufficient snow cover to
submerge the sea-ice freeboard.
31
![Page 45: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
A sponge zone of three grid cells is used for the ocean model to restore
temperature and salinity to a prescribed pattern based on climatology along the northern,
eastern, and western sidewalls of the open ocean part of the domain. The exterior-most
sponge cells are restored on a 10-day timescale and the interior-most on a 30-day
timescale for baroclinic fields, and on 1-day and 5-day timescales, respectively, for
barotropic fields. This approach provides reasonable lateral boundary conditions, helps
prevent artificial drift due to the model's limited domain, and ensures that properties at
the boundaries are kept close to observed values. The model was spun-up by cycling the
same year (1 January through 31 December 2000) of forcing data for 10.5 years.
3.2.2 Control Run and Parameter Sensitivity
For the control run, we included all processes believed to have the potential to
influence polynya size and shape, including sea-ice dynamics and thermodynamics, the
cavity under the RIS, solar radiation penetrating through sea ice, tides, precipitation, and
daily wind forcing. We also ran the model without restoring sea-surface salinity to
observed data allowing the surface salinity to evolve freely. The model was run at 2.5°
horizontal resolution for 10.5 years, with 11 vertical layers in the ocean component. A
number of parameters for which little is known for the Ross Sea were tuned based on
ranges of values obtained from the literature to give the most accurate sea-ice simulation
compared to satellite data from SSM/I. The tuned parameters (summarized in Table 3.1)
include the coefficient of drag between the ocean and ice [McPhee, 1983; Overland and
Davidson, 1992; Overland et al, 1984], the planetary boundary layer (PBL) turning angle (the
offset in the angle of the wind at the lower boundary of the atmosphere due to Ekman
layer flow with an uncertainty of approximately 10°) [McPhee, 1980], the albedo of the sea
32
![Page 46: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Table 3.1 Uncertain model parameters and coefficients used in sensitivity analyses
PBL turning angle [degrees] ocean-ice drag coefficient [dimensionless] ice albedo [dimensionless] ocean albedo [dimensionless] ice freezing coefficient [dimensionless] ice melting coefficient [dimensionless]
Control Run 25
6.0E-3 0.60 0.06 4.0 1.5
Sensitivity Run Low Value
15 3.0E-3
0.50 0.04 2.0 0.75
Sensitivity Run High Value
35 9.0E-3
0.70 0.10 6.0 2.0
ice and the ocean, and the melting and freezing coefficients for sea ice (see below). The
values in the literature for parameters such as the melting and freezing coefficients for sea
ice were experimentally derived. Within this range, the values for each parameter used in
the control run were narrowed to a single number by tuning. Thus, they are validated
model assumptions, the range for which were experimentally derived. Separate runs were
performed to assess the sensitivity of model results to the choice of coefficients for each
of these parameters.
The melting and freezing coefficients for sea ice determine the rates at which ice
melts and freezes in horizontal versus vertical directions [Holland, 1998]. The
concentration of ice is determined by the coefficient of freezing such that
c,+1 = c, + o-c,) coeft . S.7.. ^ V freezing^^ ice (5)
''lead
where C is the concentration of ice, the subscript t indicates the time index for
discretization, coeffree2ing is the coefficient for freezing, Azice is the change in ice thickness
and zlead is the thickness of ice in leads through which ice grows and equals 0.5 as given by
Hibler [1979]. Similarly, the melting of ice is determined as
ci+1=ct+(o.5Cty coef u- Az.
^ / melting ^^ ice maX(Zice'Zice__mm)
where coefmeWng is the coefficient for melting, zice is the thickness of the sea ice and zic
is the minimum allowable thickness of the modeled sea ice.
(6)
33
![Page 47: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Table 3.2 Model configurations for sensitivity runs
Model Configuration Description (a) Control run Heat is not entrained into the mixed layer from deeper layers from (b) June — March (c) December -March (d) the entire 10 year spin-up period (e) Sea ice does not move from one place to another but still undergoes thermodynamical processes (June - March) (f) Heat is not entrained into the mixed layer from deeper layers and sea ice does not move from one place to another but still undergoes thermodynamical processes (June — March) (g) The open water albedo feedback effect is examined by setting the albedo of the ocean to 1 (June - March) Wind forcing is not included in the model (h) June - March (i) December -March Snow is removed and precipitation is turned off resulting in no associated freshwater inputs to the ocean from snowfall (i.e. there are still freshwater input from ice melt) and no accumulation of snow on die sea ice (j) June -March (k) December - March (1) The cavity under the RIS is not included in the model (m) The model is run without tidal forcing (n) Solar radiation is not transmitted through sea ice (o) Daily solar radiation is calculated at hourly time steps instead of using a daily average (p) Sea-surface salinity is restored to climatological values (q) The ocean component was run with 25 instead of 11 vertical layers
3.2.3 Model Configuration Sensitivity Runs
To better understand the factors that affect the formation of the summer polynya
in the Ross Sea, we also performed a number of model configuration sensitivity
experiments. Because the control run was the most realistic model setup, sensitivity runs
were executed by excluding or modifying one model component at a time (summarized in
Table 3.2) to determine its effect on modeled polynya formation. The effect of excluding
the cavity below the RIS (run 1, Table 3.2) was examined by moving the southern model
boundary from 85°S to 80°S and making it a closed wall. It was determined that
excluding the cavity had virtually no impact on the modeled polynya formation. Thus, to
save computational expense, all subsequent model configuration sensitivity runs were
conducted with a domain that excluded the RIS cavity (and run k became the control run
34
![Page 48: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
for the model configuration sensitivity study). The sensitivity runs were executed for one
year with the change imposed on 1 June (unless otherwise specified) after model spin up.
Runs that excluded the entrainment of heat (runs b-d, Table 3.2) allowed water volume
but not heat to be entrained from deeper layers of the ocean into the mixed layer. To
exclude ice dynamics (run e, Table 3.2), sea ice was not allowed to move from one grid
cell to the next, but could still undergo thermodynamical processes. Another run
excluded both the entrainment of heat as well as ice dynamics (run f, Table 3.2). The
effect of open water albedo feedback was examined by setting the albedo of the ocean to
1 (run g, Table 3.2). Sensitivity to winds was evaluated by setting the wind speed to zero
over different time periods (runs h and i, Table 3.2). Similarly, snowfall was eliminated by
setting precipitation to zero over the same two periods, which eliminated both freshwater
input to the ocean surface from snowfall as well as snow accumulation on the sea ice
(runs j and k, Table 3.2). Tides were excluded from the model by eliminating tidal forcing
from the CATS model (run m, Table 3.2). The run without solar radiation penetrating
through sea ice (run n, Table 3.2) warmed the ice but did not warm ocean waters beneath
the ice.
Another set of sensitivity runs incorporated model setups that were more realistic
than the control run, but were either more computationally expensive or overly
prescribed. For example, in one run we calculated solar radiation at hourly time steps
instead of using a daily mean (run o, Table 3.2). An additional run was performed (run p,
Table 3.2) in which ocean surface salinity was restored to climatological values (with a
restoring timescale of 30 days) using a pattern of salinity based on summer observations
(as described by Holland et al. [2003]). To assess the effect of resolution on model
35
![Page 49: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
predictions, we increased the number of vertical layers in the ocean from 11 to 25 (run q,
Table 3.2). Because of computational expense, lower vertical resolution runs were used
for the control run and to perform all other sensitivity experiments.
Results from sensitivity experiments were compared to those of the control run
results for the months of January, February, and March. To quantitatively compare
model results from the control run and sensitivity runs, statistics were extracted from
three geographical regions (Figure 3.2) having distinct ice dynamics, including the western
Ross Sea (Western, 64°S-68°S and 145°E-160°W), the Ross Sea polynya (Polynya, 70°S-
78°S and 160°E-170°W), and the eastern Ross Sea (Eastern, 70°S to 74°S and 140°W to
125°W). These three regions were chosen for statistical analysis because ice often flows
from the eastern Ross Sea to the polynya region and then northwest to the western Ross
Sea due to the prevailing winds and ocean currents. Analyzing the three independently
Table 3.3. Model sensitivity analyses Run
a b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
i k
Model Configurations
Control run No heat entrainment from June - March
No heat entrainment from December-March No heat entrainment for the entire 10 year spin-up period Ice not moving from June - March
No heat entrainment and ice not moving from June - March Open water albedo feedback effect from June - March No wind from June - March
No wind from December - March
No snow from June - March
No snow from December - March
Fractional Ice Cover 1 January - 1 March and percentage differences compared to control run
Western 0.725 0.954 32% 0.633 -13% 0.986 36% 0.00
-100% 0.515 -29% 0.684 -6%
0.920 27% 0.823 14% 0.391 -46% 0.445 -39%
Polynya 0.494 0.737 49% 0.468 - 5 %
0.953 93% 0.760 54% 0.993 100% 0.528 7%
0.960 94% 0.793 61% 0.495 0%
0.471 -5%
Eastern 0.919 0.703 -24% 0.924 1%
0.935 2%
0.937 2%
0.718 -22% 0.872 -5%
0.807 -12% 0.822 -11% 0.724 -21% 0.764 -17%
36
![Page 50: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
provided a better overall view of sea-ice dynamics over the entire domain. Ice
concentration in each region was averaged from January through March (Table 3.3). In
addition to computing average sea-ice concentration in each region from January through
March, the change in ice concentration relative to the control run was also calculated
for each. This was computed as the difference in ice concentration between the
experimental run and the control run, normalized by the ice concentration of the control
run. Thus,
C -C n ice_sensitivity ice_control . /~,^ /r-f\
~ c ice _control
where R the percent change in ice concentration relative to the control run, Cia smjjtjvjty is
the mean ice concentration for a given region in the sensitivity run, and C^^^, is the
mean ice concentration for a given region in the control run.
3.3 Results
3.3.1 Control Run
Our model control run simulated the summer formation of the Ross Sea polynya well,
not agreeing perfectly, but capturing the basic physics of the system (Figure 3.3). In
December, the maximum extent of the modeled sea ice is virtually identical to satellite-
based measurements, with ice extending northward to between 62°S and 66°S. The
model also accurately captures the polynya opening north of the RIS on the western side
of the continental shelf in December and expanding to the full width of the ice shelf
front in January and February. Satellite data show that by January, the Ross Sea summer
polynya has broken through the remaining strip of sea ice separating the polynya from the
open ocean to the north, forming a single contiguous body of ice-free water (Figure 3.3).
37
![Page 51: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
jQ
E
o
-Q
E <D O CD Q
!
2 * 3 .Q
2 CO
2
CL <
140°E 160°E 180° 160°W 140°W 120°W 140°E 160°E 180° 160°W 140"W 120°W
Longitude Longitude
20 40 60 80 100
Figure 3.3 Sea ice concentrations from (a) satellite climatology (1987-1993) and (b) year 10 of the model control run
38
![Page 52: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
The model captures this pattern, with a thin band of open water and greatly reduced sea-
ice concentrations in the breakthrough region, although this breakthrough occurs
approximately a month late in the model. Furthermore, the simulated Ross Sea summer
polynya reaches its maximum size in January/February (Figure 3.3), similar to
observations. The refreezing of the summer polynya is captured particularly well by the
model, with the summer polynya beginning to close in March in both the satellite
observations and the model due to rapid sea-ice production just north of the RIS (Figure
3.3). By April, both the modeled and observed polynyas are almost fully closed, and the
northern extent of the ice over most of the domain reaches 68-70°S, although the extent
in the model simulation is not as far north as in observations (Figure 3.3). The largest
difference between observed sea ice dynamics and the modeled Ross Sea polynya is the
northern extent of the ice during January, February, and March in the western sides of the
60°sJ
c 3
- J
60°S
70°S
a
;«?* 3 § & ^ l
- j . . - i _ _ i.. i. ,"1-
1 | b - !
i
^"^T^^^TI^H ''.JipR
, . . J .J ..i
, a g ^
L^stggifF' -
W^^B**'̂ —
(0 3 u
.a u. to 3
60°S
70°S
\ d
\
A" •' ..-"'* ' ' • v .
„ • , ; >
*»4
\J •Jl
.,, }
^3 ' **fi
*y-A
/
, *•
w W :' r*%,
140°E 180° 140°W Longitude
140°E 180° 140°W Longitude
-mm [m]
140°E 180° Longitude
140°W
0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3 [m]
Figure 3.4 Sea-ice thicknesses from (a) June 1995 data (b) June 1998 data (c) June 1st model control run (d) January 1999 data (e) January 2000 data (f) Feb 1st model control run (sea-ice thickness data compiled by DeUberty and Geiger [2005])
39
![Page 53: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
domain (Figure 3.3). The model shows relatively dense multi-year ice in this region,
whereas observations show the ice concentrations are somewhat lower.
Modeled ice thicknesses are consistent with two seasons of sea-ice thickness data
from satellite-derived National Ice Center charts for June and January and compiled by
DeUberty and Geiger [2005] (Figure 3.4). In June, both the data (Figures 3.4a and b) and
the model results (Figure 3.4c) for the western side of the domain (near 160°E) show sea
ice decreasing in thickness from 2 m near shore to approximately 0.1 m offshore, although
on average, ice in the model was somewhat thicker than observations. In the Ross Sea
polynya region in June, both observed and modeled sea-ice thickness exhibit a distinct
east-west gradient, with markedly thicker ice being concentrated towards the east. The
primary difference is that the model produces maximum ice thicknesses of 3 m whereas
thicknesses from the ice charts are generally 2 m or less. In June, on the far eastern side
of the domain, ice thickness in both the model and the observations reaches its maximum
within a band located about 100-200 km offshore, decreasing in thickness rapidly to the
north. Again, the maximum ice thicknesses produced by the model are somewhat thicker
(2-3 m) than the observations.
In January, observed sea-ice thickness within the region of persistent ice in the
western portion of the model domain ranges from 0.7 m to 2 m (Figures 4d and e),
similar to model results of 1-2 m (Figure 3.4f). The polynya region is ice-free in January
in both the observations and model results, with the shape of the Ross Sea polynya in the
model corresponding quite well with observations from 1999 (Figure 3.4d). Finally, the
area of thick ice on the eastern side of the continental shelf corresponds well with
40
![Page 54: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
observations, particularly in 1999, although the model produces ice of greater thickness
than observations.
We also compared modeled ice and snow thickness to field data collected along
two north-south transects in the Ross Sea polynya region, one from austral autumn
[Jeffries andAdolphs, 1997] and the other from austral spring \Arrigo et a!., 2003] (Figure
3.5). In May-June (Figures 3.5a and b), the observed mean ice thickness was 0.21 m near
the continent, increased to 0.65 m at a latitude of 76°S, and then decreased to 0.35 m
along the northern ice edge near 66°S. Modeled sea ice thickness exhibited a similar
latitudinal pattern, although sea ice was generally thicker and the region of maximum ice
thickness was located farther to the north than the observations. Observed snow
w w <D c o 1c I -
1.6-1.2-
0.8-0.4-00-
a) Autumn Field Data
^F*=3^-Y- • ,
Lb-1.2-
0.8-0.4-00-
b) Autumn Model Results
IK-ctLl-L_
78°S 76°S 74°S 72°S 70°S 68°S 66°S
c) Spring Field Data
78°S 76°S 74°S 72°S 70°S 68°S 66°S
d) Spring Model Results
78°S 76°S 74°S 72°S 70°S 68°S 66°S Latitude
78°S 76°S 74°S 72°S 70°S 68°S 66°S Latitude
Mmtmm,a Snow thickness i ' Sea-ice thickness
Figure 3.5 Comparison of ice and snow thicknesses (a) from May/June 1995 field observations along transects between 160°W and 180° {Jeffries andAdolphs, 1997] and (b) from June of the 10th year of the model control run along a 180° transect (c) November 1998 field observations along a transect of approximately 175°E [Arrigo etal., 2003] and (d) from November of the 10th year of the model control run along a 175°E transect
41
![Page 55: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
thicknesses in May-June varied from 0.03 m to 0.15 m, averaging 0.10 m. Modeled snow
thicknesses were slightly greater than observed (0.14 m to 0.33 m) but exhibited a
comparable spatial pattern, with lowest accumulations in the far northern and southern
regions of the model domain. It should be noted, however, that observations of snow
and ice thickness are often of low spatial resolution and therefore are not necessarily
representative of true distributions due to high spatial variability in situ.
In November, observed ice thicknesses were around 0.1 m close to the continent,
grew to approximately 0.6 m at 72°S, remained approximately the same thickness
between 72°S and 66°S, and decreased to 0.5 m at the northern ice edge \Arrigo et a/.,
2003]. Modeled ice in spring was thicker than observed, but exhibited a similar spatial
pattern, with the thinnest ice being close to the continent and the thickest ice located in a
broad band centered at approximately 70°S. Observed snow thicknesses were very thin
in the southern reaches of the Ross Sea polynya close to the continent (<0.05 m) and
reached a maximum thickness of 0.2 m at 68°S. Modeled snow thicknesses in November
were also thicker than observed, ranging between 0.10 m (at 77°S) and 0.45 m (at 67°S)
and averaging approximately 0.25 m.
Although the model has a tendency to produce sea ice that is somewhat thicker
than has been observed in the Ross Sea, it reproduces the temporal ice kinematics with
remarkable fidelity, as well as the timing of polynya expansion and the spatial patterns of
sea-ice extent. The concordance with observations suggests that the first-order processes
responsible for the formation, expansion, and maintenance of the Ross Sea summer
polynya are well represented in the model realization used to produce the control run.
Thus, we were able to conduct sequential sensitivity studies to determine what aspects of
42
![Page 56: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
the coupled ice-ocean-atmosphere polynya system are primarily responsible for the
observed kinematics of the Ross Sea polynya.
3.3.2 Sensitivity Studies
3.3.2.1 Sensitivity to Parameters Values
An initial set of experiments was performed to test the sensitivity of the model to
those parameters about which little is known for the Ross Sea, including the PBL turning
angle, the drag coefficient between the ice and ocean, the albedo of the sea ice and the
ocean, and the melting and freezing coefficients for sea ice. These sensitivity studies
showed that varying any of these parameters within the range of values from the literature
(as described in Table 3.1) altered sea-ice concentrations by only 1-4% relative to the
control run, and had litde impact on the size of the modeled polynya.
3.3.2.2 Sensitivity to Model Structure
A second set of sensitivity experiments was designed to assess the relative
importance of different aspects of the coupled ice-ocean-atmosphere system to the
observed kinematics of the Ross Sea polynya. Most of these experiments involved
manipulation of the model to eliminate certain model components. Like the sensitivity
analyses above, these experiments demonstrated that a number of physical attributes of
the Ross Sea, as well as some physical processes, play little or no role in the observed
kinematics of the Ross Sea polynya. For example, although the cavity beneath the RIS
has been shown to affect the properties of the continental shelf bottom waters {Jacobs et
aL, 1985], our results show the cavity has almost no impact on polynya formation.
Similarly, preventing solar radiation from penetrating the sea ice and entering the
water column had a very minor influence on model results, indicating that solar radiation
43
![Page 57: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
warming the ocean through thin ice has a small effect compared to other processes such
as radiation warming the ocean through leads.
Likewise, removing tidal forcing had virtually no impact, despite tidal current velocities
near the continental shelf break that measured >70 cm s"1, consistent with measurements
made in the Ross Sea [Padman et al, 2003]. Some modeling studies in other Antarctic
regions have found that tidal currents significantly alter the evolution of sea ice (for
example near the continental shelf break in the Weddell Sea [Koentopp et al., 2005]).
However, the impact of tidal currents on sea ice is still under debate, and many modeling
studies have successfully simulated sea ice kinematics at a regional scale without including
tides [Ohshima andNihashi, 2005; Wu et al., 1997; Fichefet and Goosse, 1999].
Polynya development in runs where snow thickness was set to zero, either from
June through March (Figure 3.6j) or from December through March (Figure 3.6k), were
very similar to the control run, although in the absence of snow, the polynya was slighdy
larger and ice concentrations in the Eastern and Western regions were 17-50% lower than
in the control run. This indicated that the polynya was not highly sensitive to the amount
of snow cover on the ice on seasonal timescales. Finally, using daily radiation forcing
yielded model results that were almost identical to those obtained using hourly forcing.
3.3.2.3 Sensitivity to Ocean Heat
As anticipated, the sensitivity analyses revealed that the dynamics of Ross Sea
polynya formation are most sensitive to entrainment of heat from below (thermal polynya
forcing) and advection due to winds (mechanical polynya forcing). When heat
entrainment was shut off in June, the Ross Sea polynya still formed (Figure 3.6b), but it
was generally smaller and more heavily ice covered than in the control run (Figure 3.6a).
44
![Page 58: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
1 January a) Control Run
1 February 1 March
b) No heat entrainment from June - March
c) No heat entrainment from December - March
d) No heat entrainment for the entire 10 year spin-up period
e) Ice not moving from June - March
f) No heat entrainment and Ice not moving from June - March
180° 140°W 140°E Longitude
180° 140"W 140°E Longitude
180" 14u°W Longitude
Figure 3.6 Austral summer sea-ice concentrations of the 10th year of the model run from (a) model control run (in which the model domain excludes the cavity under the RIS) (b) no heat entrainment June - March (c) no heat entrainment December - March (d) no heat entrainment for the entire 10 year spin-up period (e) ice not moving June - March (f) no heat entrainment and ice not moving June - March
45
![Page 59: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
1 January a) Control Run
1 February 1 March
g) Open water albedo feedback effect from June - March 60°S
66°S
72°S
78°S
60°S
66°S
72°S
78°S
h) No wind June - March
i) No wind December - March
180° 140°W 140°E Longitude
20 . 40
180° 140°W 140°E Longitude
60 80
180° 140°W Longitude
[%] 100
Figure 3.6 (cont) Austral summer sea-ice concentrations of the 10th year of the model run from (a) model control run (in which the model domain excludes the cavity under the RIS) (g) open water albedo feedback effect from June - March (h) no wind from June - March (i) no wind from December - March Q no snow from June - March (k) no snow from December - March
46
![Page 60: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Sea ice concentrations in the Polynya and the Western regions between 1 January and 1
March under these conditions were 49% and 32% greater, respectively, than in the
control run (Table 3.3). Turning off heat entrainment in December, just prior to the
expansion of the Ross Sea polynya, had little effect on sea ice within this region (Figure
3.6c), with mean sea ice concentrations increasing by 5% above the control run (Table
3.3). This seasonal difference in the impact of heat entrainment is to be expected because
warm MCDW flowing onto the Ross Sea continental shelf enters at depth, and is thought
to move into the surface only during deep winter mixing. During spring and summer,
increased surface ocean stratification in the region, despite being relatively weak, prevents
the warm water from mixing into the surface during that time of year \Arrigo etal., 1998].
Additionally, a run was conducted in which heat entrainment was suppressed for
the entire model spin-up of 10 years to look at the longer term effects of ocean heat
entrainment. This run shows that there is even less open water in the polynya region for
this run than there was in any of the runs in which heat entrainment was suppressed for a
shorter period of time. This is to be expected as the effects of heat entrainment can
persist for longer than annual time scales.
In general, there was much more ice present in the entire domain for the 1-year
and 10-year no-heat entrainment runs (Figure 3.6b and 3.6d). An unexpected result for
the run in which heat entrainment was shut off from June through March (Figure 3.6b)
was that mean ice concentration in the Eastern Ross Sea was 24% lower than in the
control run (0.70 versus 0.92). This is counterintuitive because eliminating heat
entrainment into the surface would be expected to result in cooler surface waters, lower
sea ice melt, and higher ice concentrations than in the control run, as was the case in the
47
![Page 61: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Western Ross Sea and Polynya regions. It must be noted, however, that eliminating heat
entrainment introduced an unstable vertical density distribution into the model by
preventing warm, less dense water from entering the surface layer, an unrealistic
manifestation of this model experiment. This altered the modeled ocean circulation,
leading to a modest redistribution of sea ice in these model runs relative to the control
run. The important conclusion to be derived from these runs is that shutting off heat
entrainment resulted in an overall increase in ice concentration when averaged over the
entire model domain, despite some local decreases due to ice redistribution.
Besides being affected by ocean heat from below, open water albedo feedback
can play a significant role in the expansion of certain summer polynyas [Hunke andAckley,
2001]. The feedback occurs due to ocean water having a much lower albedo than ice,
thus, the increase in the absorption of solar energy increases the rate of polynya
expansion once there is open water. We conducted an experiment in which the albedo of
the ocean was set to 1, thereby reflecting all incoming solar radiation away from the ocean
surface. This modification had litde effect on the expansion of the modeled polynya
(Figure 3.6g), suggesting that open water albedo feedback is not an important process for
the formation of the Ross Sea summer polynya.
3.3.2.4 Sensitivity to Ice Advection
The importance of mechanical processes to the formation of the polynya was
confirmed by conducting a sensitivity run in which sea ice was prevented from advecting,
but with winds still present (Figure 3.6e). This allowed the winds to influence surface
ocean circulation, but without moving the ice. Consequently, newly formed ice would
not be able to advect downwind, sea ice concentrations would be higher in areas where
48
![Page 62: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
ice initially forms, and ice concentrations would be lower in areas where ice advection is
an important source of sea ice. When sea ice was prevented from adverting, large
concentrations of sea ice formed in the Polynya (0.76) and Eastern regions (0.94) but not
in the Western region of the Ross Sea (0.0). Thus, the sea ice that is present in the
Western region in the control run must be there as a result of the advection of sea ice
from further to the south and east. More importantly, because the Ross Sea polynya fails
to form in this simulation, this polynya must form primarily through the advection, rather
than the melting, of sea ice.
3.3.2.5 Sensitivity to Winds
In contrast to the above results where the elimination of heat entrainment into
surface waters reduced the size of the Ross Sea polynya, shutting off the winds had a
much more dramatic effect, resulting in the total elimination of the Ross Sea polynya.
When winds were shut off from June through March (Figure 3.6h), no model grid cells in
the Polynya region became ice-free during the summer, the time when the Ross Sea
polynya is normally at its maximum size, and the mean sea ice concentration increased
from 0.49 in the control run to 0.96 (Table 3.3). Even when the winds were not shut off
until December, the polynya barely opened (Figure 3.6i) and ice concentrations in the
polynya region were 61% greater than in the control run. These results clearly
demonstrate that the mechanical movement of ice by wind is critical to the formation of
the Ross Sea summer polynya. In all cases where thermal processes that supply heat to
the surface ocean where eliminated, the polynya was smaller than in the control run, but it
still managed to form. Thus, while thermal processes may alter polynya size, shape, and
49
![Page 63: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
timing of formation, it is advection of sea ice via the surface wind stress that is the
primary factor determining the dynamics of the Ross Sea summer polynya.
There are additional effects from suppressing wind forcing, aside from direct
effects on ice transport, which, while second order, may affect polynya dynamics. For
example, turning off the winds will reduce ocean-atmosphere heat flux because the rate
of this exchange is dependent on wind forcing. This will lead to an ocean that is, in
general, warmer than the control run in the winter and cooler in the summer,
contributing to the lack of polynya formation in this run. Additionally, surface layer
Ekman transport and wind-driven upwelling will be shut down when the wind is turned
off. However, since the movement of warm water onto the Ross Sea continental shelf is
generally driven by geostrophic flow, as opposed to wind-driven upwelling, shutting off
winds over short time scales will not likely have a direct impact on the movement of this
water mass onto the continental shelf. Although they are driven by the wind as well,
geostrophic currents operate on much longer time and space scales, and shutting off the
winds in a model run would not have as immediate an effect on geostrophic flow. Also,
shutting off the winds will not likely effect density driven vertical mixing over the
continental shelf because of the heavy ice cover present in the autumn and winter when
rates of vertical mixing are most intense.
Another run was conducted in which both heat entrainment was turned off and
ice was prevented from advecting (Figure 3.6f). Not surprisingly, this results in the region
being almost completely covered with ice during January through March and a complete
lack of polynya formation. The ice concentrations for this run are very similar to the run
in which winds were shut off between June and March (Figure 3.6h). The fact that the
50
![Page 64: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
ice concentrations are greater in this run than in the runs in which either ice is prevented
from advecting or heat entrainment is suppressed further demonstrate that both thermal
and mechanical processes are important for polynya formation.
3.4 Discussion
The Ross Sea summer polynya has been modeled in the past using a 1-D
(horizontal) model of the Ross Sea [Brommch etal., 2001] as well as a global 3° resolution
three-dimensional model \Fichefetand Goosse, 1999]. The 1-D model oiBrotnmch et al.
[2001] was forced with wind and atmospheric temperature data from the Ferrell
Automatic Weather Station (AWS). This model captured some of the interannual
variability in the size of the polynya, as determined from SSM/I data. However, there are
limitations associated with using single-point forcing data and modeling die ice in one
dimension. Although their model was able to simulate polynya formation and closure
using wind forcing only, there was a temporal offset of die polynya closure, perhaps due
to the lack of ocean heat storage in their model.
The 3-D model by Fichefet and Goosse [1999] showed that the Ross Sea polynya
could not form in the absence of ice dynamics, but did not conduct a run showing the
sensitivity to entrained heat. In addition, perhaps due to the use of monthly, rather than
daily wind forcing, their modeled polynya formed one month too late, expanded too far
westward, and too much ice remained in the eastern Ross Sea in the summer. Our model
control run with daily wind forcing was able to better capture the timing of polynya
formation, as well as its spatial extent, despite a similar excess of sea ice in the eastern
Ross Sea. Neverdieless, Fichefet and Goosse [1999] were able to show that both wind-
induced divergence of the ice pack and the influence of MCDW were crucial for polynya
51
![Page 65: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
formation. This is consistent with our findings that the Ross Sea polynya still formed in
the absence of entrained relatively warm MCDW, but that without it, the extent of the
modeled polynya was not as expansive as it is observed to be in satellite imagery.
In our modeling study, we investigated the relative contribution of thermal and
mechanical forcing mechanisms to the formation and summer expansion of the Ross Sea
polynya. Mechanically-driven polynyas are maintained either through wind-driven or
current-driven export of ice. Our results show that it is the transport of ice that plays the
dominant role in driving the formation of the Ross Sea polynya, with lesser contribution
from the entrainment of heat from deeper layers into the mixed layer. During the run in
which both the entrainment of oceanic heat was suppressed and the ice was not allowed
to be transported, the polynya failed to form. Likewise, when winds were shut off from
June through March, the Ross Sea polynya failed to form. However, when only oceanic
heat entrainment was shut off over the same time period, the polynya still formed,
although sea-ice concentrations were higher than in the control run. Even shutting off
winds as late as December, when the Ross Sea polynya has already begun to expand,
resulted in a large increase in sea-ice concentrations within the polynya region while
shutting off heat entrainment at this time had almost no impact (Table 3.3).
Results presented here corroborate earlier findings that both the transport of ice
due to winds and the entrainment of oceanic heat are essential to the development of the
Ross Sea Polynya in the spring and summer. Past studies of the Terra Nova Bay polynya,
which is located in the southwestern Ross Sea adjacent to the Ross Sea polynya, have
shown that katabatic winds are the dominant factor controlling the dynamics of that
polynya. For example, Bromwich et al. [1998] found that approximately 60% of winter
52
![Page 66: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
polynya events were linked to katabatic surges (which diminish in January) blowing older
sea ice offshore [Bromwicb and Kurt% 1984; Van Woert et al, 2001; Brommch et al, 2001]
with a glacial ice tongue blocking ice coming from the south [Massom et al, 1998; Massom
et al, 2001]. However, the katabatic winds associated with the Terra Nova Bay polynya
average close to 16 m s"1 in the autumn and winter, much higher than those of the larger
Ross Sea polynya, which average only 6 m s"1 with little seasonal variability \Arrigo et al.,
1998]. In addition, katabatic winds near the Ross Sea polynya are not as strong or as
frequent in summer months \Arrigo et al, 1998], indicating that while they may influence
the timing of early polynya formation, they do not play a major role in the maintenance
and expansion of the Ross Sea summer polynya. Our model does not explicitly include
katabatic winds and yet it is able to simulate the formation of the summer polynya. This
suggests that synoptic-scale wind forcing, as opposed to katabatic winds, are the
dominant factor in the formation and maintenance of the large Ross Sea summer
polynya, as noted earlier by Zwallj et al [1985].
The thermally-driven component of Ross Sea polynya formation stems from the
movement of warm waters into the surface layer melting existing sea ice or preventing its
formation. Although the thermally-driven component of most Antarctic polynyas is
relatively small \Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2003], there may be an oceanic heat component to
polynyas through mechanisms such as the offshore upwelling of warm water due to
katabatic winds [Davis andMcNider, 1997] or tidal forcing such as in the Okhotsk Sea
[Polyakov and Martin, 2000]. Jacobs and Comiso [1989] suggested that heat input from the
ocean was at least partially responsible for maintaining open water in the Ross Sea, as
they felt that winds alone could not explain the polynya advancing at a rate of 40 km d '
53
![Page 67: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
0 25 50 75 100 Percent of time ice covered
Figure 3.7 Percent of time in November and December during which ice concentrations were greater than 10% (satellite data from 1997 - 2001). The position of the 1000m isobath is shown by the black line. \Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2004]
in December when winds at a nearby weather station averaged 3 m s"1 and air
temperatures were less than -6°C.
Jacobs and Comiso [1989] also noticed that ice cover over the continental shelf was
persistentiy lower than above the adjacent deep ocean. This finding was later confirmed
hjA.rtigo and Van Dijken [2004], who demonstrated a remarkable correspondence
between waters with a low number of days with ice cover and the shallow bathymetry
associated with the continental shelf (Figure 3.7) \Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2004]. Although
the reduced ice concentrations in these shallow waters have been attributed to the flow of
warm MCDW onto the continental shelf, whether this warm water melts existing sea ice
or simply inhibits the formation of new sea ice is unclear. It is unlikely, however, that
MCDW is entrained into the surface during the summer to cause ice melt at that time of
54
![Page 68: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
year. For example, hydrographic data for the Ross Sea show a minor amount of
meltwater in surface waters in the Ross Sea [Smith and Gordon, 1997], which remain weakly
stratified throughout the summer \Arrigo et al, 1998; Arrigo et al, 2000]. Furthermore,
Jacobs and Comiso [1989] concluded that while MCDW enters the shelf year-round, it only
retards ice growth when entrained into the vertical circulation pattern during the winter.
The lack of evidence for ice melt for surface waters in the Ross Sea in the summer is
further indication beyond our model results that the open water albedo feedback effect
does not play a large role in the formation of the Ross Sea summer polynya. Thus, this
polynya is fundamentally different from other polynyas in which this feedback effect has
a larger impact. This is likely due to the dominating influence of winds in the formation
of the Ross Sea summer polynya, which advect sea ice out of the southern Ross Sea
before it has a chance to melt appreciably.
Our conclusion that subsurface oceanic heat is entrained only during winter
mixing and not during the summer is consistent with the lack of ice melt and ocean
stratification signatures observed in the Ross Sea in the summer. Our modeled vertical
profiles of temperature (Figure 3.8) show warm MCDW at depth both on and off the
shelf, with a cold water mass located above the MCDW over the continental shelf.
Thermal stratification intensifies during the summer, as sea surface temperatures warm
from December to March when the polynya is open. As a result, warm MCDW on the
shelf remains clearly separated from warm surface waters during spring and summer
(Figure 3.8). It is only during winter when convective overturn vertically mixes the water
column over the continental shelf that the heat from MCDW is entrained into surface
waters. These results suggest that the movement of warm MCDW onto the shelf, and
55
![Page 69: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Mar
ch
Febr
uary
Ja
nuar
y D
ecem
ber
v>
tn
•̂h o rt>
tern X)
rt>
:ratu n O
< H B-
n 3 o del a.
o 3 5
? o/5' e ft
l» bo
g o a- &
. a- ®
< B
. o e.
n 3 TS 8 0 H l-t
0 &
a>
CO
p r+
i_
i
-0
Ui o w
a- ^
NJ M
O)
aj
Co
o>
o
CO
~-i
00
CO
-4
lo
CO
o
![Page 70: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
the entrainment of its heat into surface waters via vertical mixing in the winter, reduces
the rate of winter ice growth, rendering the sea ice more easily advected to the north
\Dinniman et al, 2003; Gordon et al, 2000; Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2004; Jacobs and Comiso,
1989].
While the model used here has proven to be a useful tool for understanding the
dynamics of the Ross Sea summer polynya, there are some discrepancies between
modeled sea ice and observations, with respect to both ice concentrations and
thicknesses, that can be addressed in future studies. The most likely causes of these
discrepancies include modeled deep ocean temperatures that are slightly higher than
reality is some locations and lower in others, the absence of modeled katabatic winds, and
the lack of snow redistribution in the model. In general, modeled ice was thicker than
observed, and this may be attributable to the model producing too little oceanic heat.
However, because there is not a robust observational data set for deep ocean
temperatures throughout the Ross Sea, it is not yet possible to assess the performance of
the model in this regard (although the model does agree with what little deep ocean
temperature data are available). On the other hand, the discrepancies could merely be
attributable to interannual variability in snow and ice distributions that is not captured by
the model. Low sea ice years would cause melting of multi-year ice and lead to thinner
ice the following year. In addition, we have shown that altering snow accumulation on
the sea ice has a minor impact on ice concentrations in this study region. However, the
model does not presently include redistributions of snow due to wind, which may be
important in the overall snow mass budget [Dery and Tremblay, 2004] and could affect sea
ice concentrations to a larger extent than has been suggested here. Finally, as discussed
57
![Page 71: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
previously, the model does not include extreme wind speeds associated with katabatic
wind surges, which may be important in the timing of the polynya formation. These
peaks in wind speed could be particularly important since wind stress is proportional to
the square of the wind speed. However, some studies have looked at the factors
contributing to the timing of the Ross Sea polynya and have found that autumn and
winter air temperatures have a greater correlation to polynya formation than the
magnitude of the wind stress \Arrigo eta/., 1998], suggesting that katabatic winds are not
critical to polynya development.
3.5 Conclusions
Our model captured the formation of the Ross Sea polynya with respect to both
its spatial extent and temporal evolution and corroborated earlier findings that both
thermal and mechanical processes play a role in the formation of this polynya. We
showed that ice advection, due mostly to wind forcing as well as ocean currents, is the
most important driver of polynya formation. The entrainment of heat from warm
MCDW in winter also plays a substantial role in polynya development, with warm water
likely moving onto the continental shelf year-round and retarding ice growth in the
winter. This allows the ice to be advected away more easily when stronger winds come in
the spring and summer.
58
![Page 72: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
CHAPTER 4 Ross Ice Shelf Cavity Circulation, Residence Time, and Melting: Results from a Model of Oceanic Chlorofluorocarbons
Abstract
Despite their harmful effects in the upper atmosphere, anthropogenic
chlorofluorocarbons dissolved in seawater are extremely useful for studying ocean circulation and
ventilation, particularly in remote locations. Because they behave as a passive tracer in seawater,
and their atmospheric concentrations are well-mixed, well-known, and have changed over time,
they are ideal for gaining insight into the oceanographic characteristics of the isolated cavities
found under Antarctic ice shelves, where direct observations are difficult to obtain. Here we
present results from a modeling study of air-sea chlorofluorocarbon exchange and ocean
circulation in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. We compare our model estimates of oceanic CFC-12
concentrations along an ice shelf edge transect to field data collected during three cruises
spanning sixteen years. Our model produces chlorofluorocarbon concentrations that are quite
similar to those measured in the field, both in magnitude and distribution, showing high values
near the surface, decreasing with depth, and increasing over time. After validating modeled
circulation and air-sea gas exchange through comparison of modeled temperature, salinity, and
chlorofluorocarbons with field data, we estimate that the residence time of water in the Ross Ice
Shelf cavity is approximately 2.2 yr and that basal melt rates for the ice shelf average 10 cm yr1.
The existence of a mode in the model during which warm modified circumpolar deep water
directly enters the ice shelf cavity suggests that this system may be particularly sensitive to small
perturbations that could influence circulation patterns.
59
![Page 73: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
4.1 Introduction
As we proceed into a world of unprecedented climatic changes, it is critical to
understand the mass-balance of Antarctic ice shelves, as these bodies of ice are the
keystone to the sea-level changes that are likely to be caused by the melting of Antarctic
ice sheets [IPCC AR 4 2007]. Because the ice shelves themselves are floating, they are
capable of only minor direct contributions to sea level variations [Jenkins and Holland,
2007]. However, these grounded shelves slow the movement of ice from the continental
interior into the ocean. This continental ice could cause sea level to rise by as much as 60
m if the entire Antarctic Ice Sheet disintegrated [IPCC AR 3 2001]. The mass balance of
the ice shelves is affected positively by the flow from this continental ice sheet, by
precipitation, and by basal freezing along the bottom of the ice shelf. Mass is lost most
substantially by basal melting \Hellmer, 2004; Jacobs et al, 1992] as well as by surface
ablation and iceberg calving. Presently, these ice shelf systems are not well understood
due to our limited ability to directly observe the base of the ice shelves as well as the
circulation patterns and temperatures of seawater within the cavities below.
Anthropogenic chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs, Table 4.1) are a unique and valuable
ocean tracer, despite their detrimental role in stratospheric ozone depletion. Their
concentrations in the troposphere are well-mixed and the amounts reflect their increase
from non-existent to substantial levels during the last 70 years (Figure 4.1)
Table 4.1 Chi
CFC-11 CFC-12 CFC-113
oroflourocarbo formula CC13F CC12F2
C12FC-CC1F2
n descriptions Full name trichlorofluoromethane dichlorodifluoromethane trichlorotrifluorethane
other names f reon- l l ,F- l l ,R- l l freon-12, F-12, R-12 freon-113
60
![Page 74: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
[Walker et al, 2000]. Atmospheric CFCs dissolve in seawater, and their gas-exchange
coefficients have been experimentally determined [Bu and Warner, 1995; Warner and Weiss,
1985]. Starting in the early 1990s, CFCs have been used to evaluate ocean circulation in
the Ross Sea \Trumbore et al, 1991]. They are especially useful in studying sub-ice shelf
cavities that are isolated from the atmosphere and consequently have no additional source
of CFCs. Thus, vertical profiles of CFC concentrations measured along the mouth of the
cavities can be used to determine where water is entering and exiting and can be used as
proxies for cavity residence times. Since making measurements beneath the Ross Ice
Shelf (RIS) is extremely difficult, in the present study we have used observed changes in
CFC-12 distributions in conjunction with numerical modeling to understand the
S I 31 o
u LL. U
600
500
400
300
200 '
100
CFC-12
— CFC-11
~ - CFC-113
0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Figure 4.1 Atmospheric concentrations in the Southern Hemisphere of CFC-12, CFC-11, and CFC-113 from 1940 to 2000. [Walker et al. 2000]
61
![Page 75: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
circulation, residence times, and ultimately the melting rates within the RIS cavity. A
coupled ice-ocean-atmosphere model was used to estimate CFC gas transfer between the
atmosphere and the ocean as well as the advection-diffusion of CFC concentrations in
seawater. A robust dataset of CFCs (Figure 4.2) measured along the edge of the ice shelf
between 1984 and 2000 [Smethie and Jacobs, 2005] was used to validate modeled air-sea
exchange and ocean circulation on the continental shelf and within the cavity. The model
was then used to estimate the difficult-to-measure basal melt rate of the RIS as well as the
residence time of water within the RIS cavity.
Figure 4.2 (a) Map of the Antarctic coastline and the 1000 m isobath. The Ross Sea model domain perimeter is also shown, (b) CFC sampling locations along a transect following the RIS edge [Smethie and Jacobs 2005] during Jan-Feb 1984, Feb 1994, and Feb-Mar 2000.
62
![Page 76: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
4.2 Modeling Methods
We modeled the Ross Sea region using the Polar Ocean Land Atmosphere and
Ice Regional (POLAIR) modeling system [Reddy et al., 2007; Holland and Jenkins, 2001;
Holland et al, 2003], which includes components representing ocean circulation, land
margins (including coastlines), ice thermodynamics-dynamics (including glacial and sea
ice), and a simple atmosphere.
4.2.1 Ocean Component
The Miami Isopycnic Coordinate Ocean Model (MICOM) [Bleck and Smith, 1990],
an isopycnic, primitive equation code, was modified for use as the ocean circulation
component of the model. Parameterizations allow for weak diapycnic mixing between
vertically adjacent isopycnic model layers as well as strong lateral mixing along isopycnic
layers. To a large extent, these parameterizations mimic the observed mixing behavior in
the real ocean [Holland and Jenkins, 2001]. The Circum-Antarctic Tidal Simulation (CATS)
model [Robertson et al, 1998] was used to simulate local non-equilibrium tidal forcing. The
modeled ocean floor, the surface of the sub-ice shelf cavity, and the initial density
structure of the ocean were defined by datasets as described by Holland et al. [2003]. A
sponge zone of three grid cells is used to restore temperature and salinity to a prescribed
pattern based on climatology (see Holland et al. [2003] for details) along the northern,
eastern, and western sidewalls of the open ocean part of the domain. The interior-most
sponge cells are restored on a 30-day timescale for baroclinic fields and the exterior-most
are restored on a 10-day timescale. For barotropic fields, timescales of 1-day and 5-days
are used for the interior and exterior sponge cells, respectively. This approach helps to
prevent artificial drift due to the model's limited spatial domain, provides reasonable
63
![Page 77: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
lateral boundary conditions, and ensures that properties at the boundaries are kept close
to observed values. No restoring was used for sea surface salinity other than along the
sidewalls of the domain.
4.2.2 Sea-Ice and Ice Shelf Components
Two time varying ice thickness categories were used in each grid cell for the sea-
ice component of the model; one represents ice floes and the other represents leads
between ice floes. A cavitating-fluid rheology \Flato andHibkr, 1992] is used to treat ice-
ice interactions whereby the ice pack is resistant to convergence but not divergence. We
compute sea-ice concentration and thickness by accounting for the divergence of heat
and freshwater fluxes at the interfaces between the sea ice and the ocean and atmosphere.
Thus, in a number of ways, the sea ice is modeled as an "isopycnic" fluid layer, similar to
the ocean, but with different stress properties [Holland and Jenkins, 2001]. A complete
discussion of ice thermodynamics can be found in Holland et al. [1993] and Holland
[1998]. Sea ice concentration is computed for each grid cell as a fraction (0-1) of total
grid cell area. Initial polynya formation and its subsequent expansion in the summer in
the Ross Sea is simulated well using the POLAIR modeling system [Reddy et al, 2007].
Precipitation over sea ice increases snow thickness based on the density of snow
(300 kg m'3) with precipitation derived from a global climatology [Legates and Willmott,
1990]. Snow thickness decreases when snow sublimates or melts, or when snow is
transformed into sea ice. This latter, snow-ice production occurs through processes such
as flooding when there is sufficient snow cover to submerge the sea ice below freeboard.
Thermodynamic interactions at the interface between the ice shelf base and ocean
surface, as well at the sea ice-ocean interface, are described using a viscous-sublayer
64
![Page 78: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
parameterization [Holland andJenkins, 1999]. To incorporate the arbitrary surface
topography of an ice shelf base, the ocean model was modified by Holland and Jenkins
[2001]. The ocean cavity below the RIS is modeled as described by Holland et al.[2003].
4.2.3 Atmosphere and CFC Gas Exchange
For air temperature and sea-level pressure, NCEP reanalysis products [Kakay et
a/., 1996] are used as atmospheric forcing. Using the horizontal gradient of daily sea-level
pressure, the model computes daily geostrophic winds. In the absence of a robust dataset
for relative humidity over the ocean, a value of 0.90 was used by the model. A constant
cloud cover of 0.85 was used based on satellite-derived estimates of cloud cover over
open water in the Ross Sea for the period of November through February \Arrigo and van
Dijken, 2004].
Atmospheric CFC data from Walker et al. [2000] were used to estimate the air-sea
flux of CFC-12. The flux formulation is derived from the one-dimensional form of
Pick's first law, given as follows [Uss and Slater 197'4]:
F = KAC 1
where F (in units of mass [length2 time]"1 or MfL2!]"1) is the flux of gas through the layer,
K [LT1] is the exchange constant, and AC [ML3] is the concentration difference across
the layer thickness. Given that the gas exchange obeys Henry's Law:
P = HC 2
where P [patm] is the partial pressure of the solute, C [pmol kg4] is the concentration of
the solute in solution, and H Peg patm pmol"1] is Henry's law constant. Fick's law can be
reformulated, as follows:
65
![Page 79: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
pair
F = KAC = Kwater(-^-C^) = Kwater(aPc%-Cwc^) 3
where Kmter [m s"1] is the exchange constant for seawater (the term is also referred to as
the gas transfer coefficient or piston velocity), P££c [patm] is the partial pressure of CFC
in dry air at a pressure of one atm, C ^ T [pmol kg1] is the CFC concentration in
seawater, a [pmol (kg patm)"1] is the reciprocal of H which, in this case, represents the
CFC solubility for water-vapor saturated air (also referred to as the partial pressure
equilibrium constant). Also note that P£pC is equivalent to the dry air mixing ratio
multiplied by 1012. Thus, the oceanic CFC concentration at the next modeled time step,
i+1, is computed as:
csra+i)=csr(o+^wlrtr[a^(o-csr(o]^ 4 An
where A/ [s] is the calculation timestep and Ah [m] is the thickness of the ocean mixed
layer. The piston velocity, K„ter, is calculated as follows [Wanmnkhof, 1992]: & water ~ Q 1.6ES[™»/mhr} ' V4 + V ) " JSc/660 5
where a [cm s~2(hr m2)"1] is a constant of 0.31 as given by Wanninkhoj'[1992] for steady
winds, tt [m2 s"2] is the wind speed squared and v (m2 s"2) is the wind speed variance. Sc
(dimensionless) is the Schmidt number which is temperature dependent and given as:
Sc = ax + a2Tc + a3Tc2 + a4Tc
3 C
where X, [°C] is the temperature and at ate the diffusion coefficients [Haine and VJchards,
1995; Zheng etal., 1998], and differ for each CFC gas (see Table 4.2). CFC solubility, a, is
calculated using the formulation given by Warner and Weiss [1985]:
66
![Page 80: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
a = exp(4 + A, + 4 log TKim + AJK/m2 + s(d(B1 + B2TKim
+ "3* Kim )) 7
JK/100
where A^ and B; are coefficients summarized in Table 4.2 [Bu and Warner, 1995; Warner and
Weiss, 1985], TK/W0 is the ocean temperature in Kelvin divided by 100, and salis salinity.
We assumed that there was no atmosphere-ocean CFC exchange through sea ice,
leading to a CFC gas-exchange flux that is proportional to the fraction of open water in
each grid cell.
Sch
mid
t N
umbe
r (S
c)
Gas
Sol
ubili
ty
for CFC-11: a, = 3501.8 a2=-210.31 a3= 6.1851 a4= -0.07513
A, = -232.0411 A2= 322.5546 A3= 120.4956 A4= -1.39165 B,= -0.146531 B2= 0.093621 B,= -0.0160693
for CFC-12: Jh = 3845.4 a2=-228.95 a3= 6.1908 a4= -0.067430
Aj = -220.2120 A2= 301.8695 A3= 114.8533 A4= -1.39165 B, = -0.147718 B2= 0.093175 B3= -0.0157340
fof CFC-113:
^ C C F C - 1 1 3 — 1 - 1 6 ^CCFC-11
A, =-231.902 A2 =322.915 A3=119.111 A4 =-1.3917 Bj = -0.02547 B2 = 0.00454 B3 = 0.0002708
Table 4.2 Constants for the temperature-dependent Schmidt number [Zheng 1998 (CFC-11 and CFC-12); Haine and Richards, 1995 (CFC-113)] and gas solubility [in units of pmol kg'1 patnY1, Warner and Weiss 1985 (CFC-11 and CFC-12); Bu and Warner 1995 (CFC-113)]
4.2.4 Model Grid and Runtime
The horizontal model grid is based on a Mercator projection and all grid cells are
rendered to be locally square. The horizontal grid box size in the middle of the Ross Sea
domain is approximately 2°. Moving southward in the model domain, grid cells become
smaller in proportion to the cosine of the latitude (2° zonally and 2°cos(cp) meridionally,
where cp is latitude). The model domain reached from 155°E to 135°W and from 60°S to
67
![Page 81: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
84°S, with 24 vertical layers. This domain includes die Ross Sea continental shelf, die
deep ocean, and die cavity beneatii die RIS (Figure 4.2).
The model was run over the simulated time period 1950-2000. Although there
were detectable levels of CFC in the water column prior to 1950, during the first five
years of model spin up, CFCs remained low, less dian 3% of tiieir maximum values.
(Sensitivity analyses show that starting the model runs with detectable levels at diis point
in time does not have a significant effect on modeled CFC concentrations by 1984.)
4.2.5 Residence Time
We estimated die residence time of water witiiin the RIS cavity in the model using
an artificial dye tracer approach. Initial dye concentrations were set to 1.0 in all grid cells
beneath die RIS and set to zero in all grid cells outside the RIS. The dye was tiien
allowed to advect and diffuse by the ocean model as a passive tracer, and die amount of
time it took for the mean dye concentration witiiin the RIS cavity to be reduced to 0.5
was taken to be the half-life of dye witiiin the cavity. The reduction of dye in die cavity
resembles exponential decay, so the residence time (x) can be computed as:
where, tVl is die half-life of dye in RIS the cavity \Killops andKillops, 2005].
4.3 Results and Discussion
4.3.1 Modeled CFC Distributions
In accord witii all three years of field data from the Ross Sea [Smethie and Jacobs,
2005], the model produces CFC concentrations (Figure 4.3) that are highest in the surface
68
![Page 82: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
waters (-2.0 pmol kg1 in 1984, -3.0 pmol kg1 in 1994, and -3.5 pmol kg1 in 2000) and
decrease significandy towards the bottom (-1.0 pmol kg"1 in 1984, —2.0 pmol kg4 in
1994, and -2.5 pmol kg"1 in 2000). However, the model, which creates a thick surface
layer of high CFC concentrations, does not capture the strong surface stratification that is
observed. The model also confirms the noteworthy seasonal signature in CFC
concentration as the CFCs move from the atmosphere into the mixed layer (Figure 4.4),
with the highest flux and greatest concentrations in the surface waters in the late austral
summer. The high winds and absence of sea ice facilitates enhanced CFC exchange with
the atmosphere despite the fact that warmer water temperatures decrease gas solubility.
Deep mixing in the winter distributes the CFCs throughout much of the water column
and dilutes the high surface summertime concentrations.
Evident in the field dataset for CFC-12 in 1984, 1994, and 2000 is a region of
low-CFC water at (200-800 m) depth centered between 178°W and 175°W, as well as a
slightly less pronounced low-CFC region that is shallower (100-500 m) and centered
around 170°E (Figure 4.3). These features have been suggested to reflect a plume of low-
CFC water diat exits the RIS cavity after prolonged isolation from atmospheric CFC
sources [Smethie and Jacobs, 2005]. Similar plumes of low CFC water can be seen in the
model results (Figures 4.3), although they are formed at slighdy different depdis and
locations. Both plumes are formed deeper in the water column in the model, with die
westward plume centered near 165°W and the eastward plume approximately 100 m
above the ocean floor and centered around 178°E. The horizontal distributions of
modeled CFCs at 450 m depth (Figure 4.3c) show a mass of low-CFC water to the north
of die cavity mouth that appears to intrude into the cavity.
69
![Page 83: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
(a) o 1984 (Early February) 1994 (Mid February) 2000 (Early March)
140E 160E 180 160W 140W 140E 160E 180 160W MOW 140E 160E 180 160W 140W
longitude
Figure 4.3 CFC-12 concentrations [pmol kg-1] from (a) field studies along a transect following the Ross Ice Shelf edge from Jan-Feb 1984; Feb 1994; Feb-Mar 2000 [Smethie and Jacobs 2005], (b) model estimates along 77.3°S for equivalent model dates, (c) model estimates at 450 m surrounding the mouth of the cavity, (d) model estimates at 450 m depth for the entire model domain, and (e) model estimates for the upper mixed layer for the entire model domain.
70
![Page 84: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Figure 4.4 Model estimates of CFC-12 concentration [pmol kg4] at 180°, 77.3°S from 1980 through 2000.
Modeled mixed layer CFC concentrations (Figure 4.3e) clearly increase over time between
1984 and 2000. Surface concentrations correspond in part to sea-ice distributions, with
lower concentrations located within the Ross Sea polynya than the surrounding ice
covered waters, particularly in 1984 and 2000. The lower values occur when deeper
convective mixing on the shelf dilutes high surface concentrations. These surface values
reflect a near equilibrium state with the atmosphere, which is a function of water
temperature and salinity, with concentrations also being affected by lack of gas-exchange
in the presence of sea ice as well as dilution of CFCs when the mixed layer thickness is
large.
71
![Page 85: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
150E 160E 170E 180 WOW 160W 150W HOW 130W
Longitude -^
150E 160E 170E 180 170W 160W 150W HOW 130W
Longitude -£>
1
0.7
0.4
0.1
-0.2
-0.5
-0.8
-1.1
-1.4
-1.7
- 2
Figure 4.5 Modeled temperature and current velocity (averaged over the final year of the model run) for (a) the surface layer and (b) 450 m depth.
4.3.2 Modeled Circulation, Salinity, and Temperature
Mean ocean currents were computed for the entire model domain, including the
cavity beneath the RIS (Figure 4.5). Velocities in the surface layer and at a depth of 450
m were averaged over the final year of the model run. There is considerable seasonal and
interannual variability in the velocity fields. Velocities on the open continental shelf are
in the range of 2.0 to 8.0 cm s"1, with much lower velocities in the RIS cavity of between
0.2 and 1.0 cm s4. The velocity vectors clearly show the clockwise Ross Sea gyre located
72
![Page 86: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
to the northeast of the continental shelf with velocities of approximately 2-3 cm s"1.
Waters run westward along the edge of the RIS at velocities of <1 cm s"1 and then
northward along the edge of the continent until it flows off the continental shelf.
Eventually, these waters flow westward along the coast as the east wind drift. At a depth
of 450 m, a mass of warm Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) originating north of the
continental shelf can be seen to move southward onto the eastern side of the shelf,
transforming into Modified Circumpolar Deep Water (MCDW) by mixing with cooler
ambient waters.
Within the RIS cavity, velocities are much lower than they are on the shelf,
reflecting the absence of direct wind forcing on waters within the cavity. Waters generally
move in a clockwise direction, from the east to the northwest, both in the surface layer
and at 450 m depth. At both depths, there is stronger flow, just under 1 cm sA, in the
eastern side of the cavity as well as in the southern most reaches. In the surface layer, this
flow moves to the northwest more slowly (approximately 0.25 to 0.5 cm s"1) than in the
east, exiting the cavity in the west. At 450 m, this flow moves to the north in the center
of the cavity at about 0.5 cm s4. Along the west side of the cavity, there is almost no
movement of the water (flow < 0.1 cm sA) at 450 m. At this depth, flow exits the cavity
in the center of the RIS transect.
The persistent salinity pattern along the RIS transect both in situ and in the model
(Figure 4.6) is marked by a mound of salty deep water in the western side of the study
region, with the halocline deepening rapidly between 170°E and 170°W. This mound of
salty water is maintained in geostrophic balance by the strong northward flow along the
west side of the model domain. Maximum salinities in the deep western section of the
73
![Page 87: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
1984 (Early February) 1994 (Mid February) 2000 (Early March)
luuu 170E 180 170W 160W 170E 180 170W 160W 170E 180 170W 160W
Figure 4.6 Salinity from (a) field studies (along a transect following the ice shelf edge Jan-Feb 1984; Feb 1994; Feb-Mar 2000) and (b) model estimates (along a transect of 77.3°S for equivalent model dates)
transect are somewhat higher in situ than they are in the model (34.8 and 34.6,
respectively). Like the freshening of deep waters observed in the field data over the two
decades [Smethie and Jacobs, 2005], there is a slight freshening in the model, with values
above 34.65 produced in 1984, but not afterwards.
In situ temperatures are in the range of -2°C to -1.4°C along the RIS transect for
the years sampled (Figure 4.7a), with pockets of higher temperature (-1.4°C to 0°C)
observed in surface waters. Surface temperatures were lower along the 2000 transect,
which may be attributed to sampling taking place in late rather than mid-summer.
Modeled temperatures along the RIS transect (Figure 4.7b) range from -2°C to -1.4°C
over most of the region, broadly similar to observations. However, the model does not
produce the same degree of warming in the surface layers (-1 to 0°C) and exhibits areas
of relatively warm water at depth (-1.4 to -0.2°C). These plumes of warm water originate
in the north, as can be seen in the horizontal section of CFCs at 450 m depth
74
![Page 88: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
1984 (Early February) 1994 (Mid February) 2000 (Early March)
170E 180 170W 160W 170E 180 170W 160W 170E 180 170W 160W • -2.0
Longitude
Figure 4.7 Temperature from (a) field studies (along a transect following the ice shelf edge Jan-Feb 1984; Feb 1994; Feb-Mar 2000) and (b) model estimates (along a transect of 77.3°S for equivalent model dates) (c) model estimates surrounding the mouth of the cavity
surrounding the cavity mouth (Fig. 7c), and represent MCDW. Although this warm deep
water was not evident in the in situ data collected in 1984 and 1994, it was observed in
the 2000 field data as well as in previous studies of Ross Sea hydrography and has been
attributed to MCDW moving over the shelf [Jacobs and Comiso, 1989; Jacobs and Giulivi,
1999; Jacobs et al, 1970; Jacobs etal, 1979; Smethie and Jacobs, 2005]. These plumes of
MCDW have been observed before in the southern Ross Sea at a depth of 250 m
centered at approximately 165°W [Jacobs et al., 1979], 175°W [Jacobs and Giulivi, 1999] and
175°W [Jacobs et al., 1970]. Furthermore, Jacobs and Comiso [Jacobs and Comiso, 1989]
observed two distinct plumes of warm water, similar to those produced in the model,
along 173°W at 250 m and at 178°E at a depth of 200 m. The model predicts two
plumes of deep warm water, one centered at 180° at a depth of 400 m and the other
centered along 165°W at 500 m.
75
![Page 89: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
4.3.3 Residence Time Estimates
Over the course of the model run, the dye tracer of water in the cavity dilutes
significantly near the mouth of the cavity with much higher concentrations in the far
southern reaches of the cavity (Figure 4.8). There is a fairly smooth gradient of increasing
concentrations towards the interior of the cavity, with greater intrusion of water into the
cavity in the east. It can clearly be seen that the residence times are greatest for water at
the far south of the cavity and decrease moving northward. The dye also shows that
there is flow into the cavity along the east and out of the cavity along the west, consistent
with modeled velocities and the flow pattern that we have described above. We estimate
that the mean residence time for water in the entire cavity is approximately 2.2 yrs. This
age is consistent with previous residence time estimates for the upper layer of the RIS
cavity of <6 yrs made 400 km south of the ice shelf edge at the Ross Ice Shelf Project Ice
Hole (82°22.5'S,168°37.5'W) [Michelet al., 1979]. It is also within with the range of 0.9-
5.4 yrs calculated by Smethie and Jacobs [2005], which was based on box and stream tube
model calculations constrained by observed CFC concentrations, although our estimate is
somewhat lower than their best fit of 3.4 yr.
4.3.4 Low-CFC Waters
Examining the in situ temperatures (Fig. 6a) associated with the low-CFC waters
at the mouth of the RIS cavity (Fig. 3a), it can be seen that there is no correlation
between CFC concentration and water temperature in the observations. In 1984, the
low-CFC waters were associated with both a region of cold water marked by the -1.92°C
isotherm and a pocket of warm water (-1.1°C) centered near 174°W at 300 m depth.
76
![Page 90: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Figure 4.8 Distribution of RIS cavity "dye" in the mixed layer at the half-life of the dye in the cavity [%]
During 1994, the deep eastern low-CFC waters (centered near 178°W and 500 m depth)
correspond very well with the extremely cold -1.92°C isotherm, while the shallower
western low-CFC water (centered near 174°E and 200 m depth) was co-located with
warmer temperatures of up to -1.2°C. Finally, in 2000, the low CFC region centered near
174°W corresponded with warmer waters (-1.6 to -1.2°C) while the eastern low-CFC
region was associated with relatively cold water.
In contrast, low-CFC waters in the model consistendy correspond to regions with
warm ocean temperatures. This is unexpected as the low-CFC regions along the RIS
transect are often associated with water leaving the RIS cavity [Smethie and Jacobs, 2005],
which is colder than the water on the open continental shelf since much of its heat has
been extracted as it moved within the ice shelf cavity. Therefore, model results suggest
that rather than representing waters moving northward from beneath the RIS, the low
CFC concentration in waters along the RIS edge also may represent the advection of
warm CDW southward onto the shelf, where it mixes with shelf waters to become
MCDW, and into the RIS cavity. CDW is low in CFCs due to it's isolation from the
77
![Page 91: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
atmosphere [Smethie and Jacobs, 2005]; thus warm water moving onto the shelf and
becoming MCDW would be similarly low in CFCs. Because waters flowing out from the
RIS are relatively cold (Figure 4.7), the plumes of warm, low-CFC water observed along
the mouth of the cavity are entering the cavity instead of exiting. (This is confirmed by
model results showing that the warm, low-CFC plumes along the mouth of the cavity
originate from outside the cavity.) The warm salty CDW moves onto the Ross Sea
continental shelf at a depth of 400 to 500 m and flows southward along the ocean floor
[Jacobs andComiso, 1989], occasionally entering the mouth of the cavity at depth while
retaining its characteristic low-CFC concentrations, especially in the east where the
continental shelf is narrow.
Although the field data do not show a clear signature of warm MCDW entering
the cavity in 1984 and 1994, die data from 2000 show warm, low-CFC water at depth that
appears to be entering the cavity. Additionally, there are many observations showing
warm MCDW at depth on the Ross Sea Continental Shelf [Jacobs andComiso, 1989; Jacobs
andGiulivi, 1999; Jacobs eta/., 1970; Jacobs eta/., 1979]. Furthermore, warm CDW is known
to enter the Pine Island Ice Shelf cavity [Jacobs et a/., 1996] (located to the northeast of the
larger RIS cavity), and is thought to be a risk to the melting of the ice shelf. Our model
results, in conjunction with observations, suggest that there are two distinct modes of
circulation on the Ross Sea continental shelf. In the first mode, high salinity shelf water
(HSSW) is found at depth along the mouth of the cavity. Water from this source is
formed by the free2ing of seawater on the continental shelf and is very cold and dense,
consistent with what is observed in field data. This mode does not involve the flow of
78
![Page 92: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
low-CFC MCDW into the RIS cavity. The second mode still involves formation of
HSSW, but is dominated by warm MCDW directly entering the cavity at depth.
4.3.5 Basal Melt Rates
Melting of the RIS is greatest near the cavity mouth (Figure 4.9), due to the heat
sources from outside the cavity, including the warm, deep, MCDW described above and
surface waters warmed by the sun and the atmosphere. The highest rates of melting
occur in September and March. In September, melting along most of the cavity mouth is
approximately 0.3 m monthA, with rates between 0.08 and 0.3 m month"1 extending into
the cavity 100 to 200 km. After September, melting rates drop until around January, and
then increase again until March. In March, there is a similar pattern of melting as in
September, with melt rates exceeding 0.35 m month4, but with fairly high degrees of
79
![Page 93: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
melting extending over a smaller area. These high melting rates near the mouth of the
cavity are in contrast to estimates of basal freezing that dominate most of the interior of
the RIS, where ice accretion rates range from 0 to 0.04 m month"1 throughout the year.
Overall, basal melting for the cavity is lowest in May through July, with fairly uniform
freezing both in the interior of the cavity and near the mouth during this time. Taking
both ice shelf basal melting and freezing into account, the mean annual modeled basal
melt rate for the RIS is 0.10 m yr"1. This rate is comparable to the previous estimate of
—0.15 m yr"1 for areas of the RIS that exceed a 300 m draft [Smethie and Jacobs, 2005].
Although model estimates of high basal melting in the winter may seem
counterintuitive, higher melting rates are the result of more intense convective mixing on
the continental shelf in the winter. As salt rejection due to the refreezing sea ice
destabilizes the water column, deep warm MCDW is entrained into near surface waters.
This additional heat source contributes to greater basal melting of the ice shelf during the
otherwise cold winter. In March, the melting rate is also high, in this case due to warm
surface waters on the Ross Sea continental uncovered by sea ice and exposed to solar
insolation and increased air temperatures. These waters enter the RIS cavity in the
surface and contribute to the high melt rates at this time of year.
Despite the fact that the flow of MCDW into the RIS cavity was only observed
during the 2000 field season, its existence in the model suggests that the system may be
quite sensitive to a perturbation away from the current mode (in which HSSW is found at
depth along the mouth of the cavity) towards an alternative state. In this state, there
could be increased melting at the base of the RIS due to the MCDW entering the cavity
year round and then in cold winter months, the freezing of sea ice just outside the cavity
80
![Page 94: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
causing the water column to mix more deeply, distributing some of the warm MCDW at
depth into the surface. Similarly, warm water is known to enter the Pine Island Ice Shelf
cavity and melt the ice shelf there {Jacobs etal., 1996]. It is critical to acknowledge the
potential for this warm water to move into the RIS cavity, because depending on die
severity, such events could have a destabilizing effect on the Ross Ice Shelf. Currendy, the
observed frequency and magnitude of warm MCDW entering the RIS cavity is less than
die model estimates. The CDW water mass is old, connected to the North Adantic
through thermohaline circulation, and has been at depth too long for its temperature to
be affected by recent global warming. However, it is possible that climate change will
alter circulation patterns on the Ross Sea continental shelf. One mechanism by which this
may occur is that westerlies are expected to shift due to global warming [Russe/iet al.,
2006]. It is understood from the paleorecord that a latitudinal shift in the westerlies could
substantially affect upwelling of deepwater masses in the Southern Ocean \Lamj et al.,
2007]. Such an increase in upwelling could put pressure on the oceanographic system in
die Ross Sea towards the mode exhibited in the model in which there is a larger amount
of warm MCDW entering the RIS cavity. This could cause a greater degree of melting of
the base of the RIS, which could result in its destabilization.
4.4 Conclusions
We have presented results from a modeling study of CFCs, ocean circulation, and
basal melting in the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Field data from a previous study [Smethie and
Jacobs, 2005] comprised of three different cruises were used to validate the modeled
temperatures, salinities, and CFC concentrations. Our model results suggest that plumes
of warm low CFC water that flow across the mouth of the RIS cavity may represent deep
81
![Page 95: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
water (which has been isolated from the atmosphere and thus low in CFCs) that has
flowed onto the continental shelf and into the RIS cavity. This suggests the potential that
a markedly different mode exists in which warm MCDW directly enters the RIS cavity in
addition to the observed mode in which low-CFC water masses along the mouth of the
cavity originate from within the cavity.
82
![Page 96: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
CHAPTER 5
Ross Sea Primary Production and Sea Ice under Future Climatic Change Scenarios
Abstract
Average global temperatures are expected to rise 2-4 degrees Celsius in the next 50
years and winds are expected to increase in intensity and exhibit patterns different from the
present day. As these changes take place there will be unprecedented and unpredictable
impacts on ecological systems, particularly at high latitudes. Here we present results from a
modeling study of the effects of a range of expected changes in atmospheric temperature and
wind forcing on sea ice distributions and phytoplankton dynamics in the Ross Sea over the
next 50 years. Our results show that both increased temperatures and winds result in a year-
round reduction in sea ice in the Ross Sea. The winter sea ice maximum for the intermediate
temperature run (2.5°C increase in 50 years), intermediate wind run (1% increase per year for
50 years), and intermediate temperature+wind run will decline by 0%, 13%, and 11%,
respectively, by the end of the 50-year model run. The sea ice minimum will drop by 22%,
23%, and 26%, respectively, for these three runs. Associated with these reductions in sea ice
cover, annual primary production is predicted to decrease by 8%, increase by 16% and 8%
under altered atmospheric forcing in the 'temperature', 'wind', and 'temperature+wind' runs
respectively. These reflect substantial changes in primary production that may occur in the
next 50 years. Whereas the 'wind' run resulted in an increase in productivity, the most
notable predicted changes in primary production were in the low wind scenario (10% increase
in 50 years) in which peak production went up by 43% and the high wind scenario (a
doubling of winds in 50 years) in which peak production was delayed 20 days.
83
![Page 97: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
5.1 Introduction
It is now well-established that global air temperatures are rising as a result of
increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas content and are likely to continue to increase for
the foreseeable future [Brohan et al, 2006]. Associated with this increase in temperature,
the number of severe weather systems as well as peak wind speeds are expected to rise
[Frauenfeld and Davis, 2003; Lucaritri and Russell, 2002; Simmonds and Keay, 2000]. Polar
regions have been identified as being uniquely vulnerable to change, and numerical
simulations of future climates by General Circulation Models (GCMs) agree in one
important respect: climate warming is predicted to begin earlier and manifest itself more
severely at the poles [Flato etal., 2000; Shindellet al, 1999; Stouffer et al, 1989]. For
example, high latitude precipitation is very likely to increase in part due to positive
feedbacks involving snow, sea ice, and other processes [Groisman et al., 2005]. The Arctic
has already undergone significant change, with surface air temperatures increasing faster
than almost anywhere on Earth, resulting in dramatic reductions in sea ice extent [Shimada
et al., 2006]. Although similarly striking changes in the Southern Hemisphere have mostly
been restricted to the Antarctic Peninsula region, it is expected that the rest of Antarctica
will soon exhibit significant changes due to global warming [IPCC, 2007].
The Southern Ocean currently plays an important role in the global carbon cycle,
accounting for a significant amount of the 2 Pg yr"1 of anthropogenic C 0 2 sequestered
from the atmosphere to the deep ocean [Caldeira andDujjy, 2000]. The uptake of C0 2 by
the ocean regulates the amount of this greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, thus helping to
control temperature and climate. At the same time, the rate of C 0 2 uptake by the ocean
is affected by changes in biogeochemical and physical oceanographic processes resulting
84
![Page 98: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
from temperature increases. However there is limited understanding of the ocean's
physical and biological feedbacks to changing atmospheric C 0 2 [Sarmiento et al., 1998].
A number of feedbacks are expected to be expressed in the Southern Ocean.
Increasing temperatures and precipitation associated with warming should decrease the
density of surface waters, thereby increasing stratification and reducing the uptake of
atmospheric C 0 2 [Caldeira and Duffy, 2000]. Increased stratification will also reduce the
flux of nutrients from the deep ocean into the surface mixed layer, reducing
phytoplankton growth and sinking, hence the strength of the biological pump.
Additionally, rising ocean temperatures will decrease C0 2 solubility, reducing the ability
of the ocean to remove C 0 2 from the atmosphere. Similarly, continued intensification
and alteration of winds throughout the 21st century are likely to impact the ability of the
ocean to act as a sink for atmospheric C0 2 [Shindell and Schmidt, 2004]. These predictions
are consistent with observations showing that over the last 20 years, winds over the
Southern Ocean have increased by approximately 20% due to a positive trend in the
Southern Annual Mode (SAM) causing a poleward intensification of westerly winds south
of 45°S [Marshall, 2003; Marshall, 2007; Russell et al., 2006]. It is estimated that the
Southern Ocean C 0 2 sink has weakened by 0.08 petagrams C yr"1 between 1981 and 2004
because of the observed increase in winds and enhanced ventilation of C02-rich
subsurface waters \LeQuere et al., 2007]. This outgassing of C 0 2 dominates the variability
in the C 0 2 flux [Le Quere et al, 2007]. Conversely, increased upwelling during the positive
phase of the SAM has been shown to increase phytoplankton abundance by bringing
additional nutrients into surface waters [Lopenduski and Gruber, 2005] acting as a negative
feedback on C 0 2 outgassing.
85
![Page 99: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Understanding the effects of climate change on distributions and annual cycles of
sea ice and primary productivity is critical. Antarctic polynyas (regions of open water
where ice is expected to be present) are sites of high primary productivity and serve as
key habitats for higher trophic level animals such as seals, penguins, sea birds and whales
[Lauriano et al, 2007]. One of the best ways to understand how climate change may alter
the sensitive physical and biological oceanographic systems of Antarctica is to simulate
these interactions using a mechanistic regional model. Here we present results of one
such study investigating the impacts of anticipated changes in air temperature and wind
speeds on sea ice concentrations and phytoplankton productivity in the Ross Sea sector
of the Southern Ocean.
5.2 Methods
5.2.1 The Physical Model
The physical model used in this study is the Polar Ocean Land Atmosphere and
Ice Regional (POLAIR) modeling system [Holland and Jenkins, 2001; Holland et al., 2003].
The ocean circulation component of the model comes from the Miami Isopycnic
Coordinate Ocean Model (MICOM) [Bleck and Smith, 1990]. MICOM has an embedded
mixed layer model based on a turbulent kinetic energy budget. The details of the
POLAIR model are summarized by Holland et al. [2003] and Reddy et al. [2007]. Briefly,
the Ross Ice Shelf is modeled using a viscous-sublayer parameterization describing
thermodynamic interactions at the interface between the ice shelf base and the ocean
surface [Holland and Jenkins, 1999]. The model has been modified to be compatible with
the surface topography of the base of the ice shelf [Holland and Jenkins, 2001]. The sea ice
model includes both dynamical and thermodynamical processes. Ice-ice interactions are
86
![Page 100: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
treated using cavitating fluid rheology, whereby the ice pack does not resist divergence or
shear but does resist convergence. Where the sidewalls are boundaries with open ocean
(for the northern, eastern and western walls), a sponge zone of three grid cells is used.
For baroclinic fields, the restoring time scale for the exterior sponge cells is 10 days and
30 days for the interior cells. For barotropic fields, timescales of 1 day and 5 days are
used respectively.
The model grid uses a Mercator projection with cells being locally square and
becoming smaller moving southward in the domain. The average grid cell in the middle
of the Ross Sea Continental shelf is approximately 70 x 70 km. The model domain is
comprised of 40 grid cells in the longitudinal direction from 140°E to 120°W and 33 grid
cells in the latitudinal direction from 60°S to 85°S.
For the sea floor, a gridded version of the RIGGS data [Greischar et al., 1981] were
used south of 78°S, and ETOP05 was used to the north. The dataset used for the sub-
ice shelf cavity was derived from the Ross Ice Shelf Geophysical and Glaciological Survey
[Bentley andje^ek, 1981]. It was supplemented by ice front positions from the Antarctic
Digital Database [SCAR, 1993] and height measurements from the USCGC Polar Sea in
1994 [Keys et al, 1998]. The density of the modeled ocean was initialized using the
Hydrographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean Olbers et al. 1992]. A detailed explanation of
the datasets used is described by Holland et al. [2003]. For wind forcing, the model
computes geostrophic winds from the pressure gradient of daily sea level pressure data
fromNCEP [Kalnajetal, 1996].
87
![Page 101: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
5.2.2 The Biological Model
The model for phytoplankton growth in the Ross Sea is derived from the
Coupled Ice, Atmosphere, and Ocean (CIAO) model of the same region \Arrigo et al,
2003]. Phytoplankton growth is modeled as a function of temperature, light, and nutrient
availability. Phytoplankton growth rate (ju [hr1]) is calculated using the temperature
dependent maximum growth rate (jumax [hr1]), and resource limitation (Resource^ Q), as
follows:
The temperature-dependent maximum growth rate is calculated as follows [Epp/ey, 1972]:
. , „0.063ir Mnax = Moe
where p0 is the net specific growth rate at 0°C (0.59 day"1) and Tis the temperature [°C].
Resource limitation is the minimum of light limitation (Enm) and iron limitation (Feu^)\
ResourceLim =mm(ELim,FeUm)
FeUm is calculated as
Fe Fe
K/iFe + Fe
where K1/2_FE [nM] is the temperature independent half-saturation constant for growth
(0.01 nM) and Fe [nM] is the concentration of iron [Arrigo et al, 1998; Monod, 1942]. Light
limitation is calculated from instantaneous photosynthetically available radiation, PAR
[jjiEin m 2 s"1], the photoacclimation parameter, EK [fjiEin m~2 s"1], and the photoinhibition
term, Inhib:
PAR
ELim=(\-e*« )• Inhib
![Page 102: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
The photoacclimation parameter is a function of PAR and E & « , the maximum
photoacclimation parameter [McClain et al, 1996; Arrigo et al, 2003]
F
where E & a x is 30.0 [Arrigo et al, 2003] and
5 = exp[1.089-2.121og(i?imax)]
The photoinhibition term (Inhib), is calculated from PAR and the photoinhibition
threshold (100 uEin m"2 s"1) [Arrigo et al, 2003]:
Inhib = 1 -
20PAS
l-e m
l+5-108e m
Inhib remains near 1 between irradiances of 0 and the photoinhibition threshold.
Thereafter, Inhib drops quickly to 0.5 at the threshold and then down to 0 where it
remains as irradiance continues to increase.
PAR h\iEin m~2 s"1] for the mixed layer is calculated using Beer's law [McClain et al.,
1996]:
PARboltom=PARlope-K^
where PAR^^ [[jiEin m"2 s"1] is the PAR at the bottom of the layer, JPAR^ [[xEin m 2 s"1] is
the PAR at the top of the layer, and A% [m] is the layer thickness. The diffuse attenuation
coefficient for a given layer, KD [m4], is calculated as [McClain et al, 1996; Morel, 1988]:
KD = 0.027 + 0.0518(C/*/)0428
where Chi is the concentration of chlorophyll [mg chl m\ It then follows that the
average light for a given layer is:
PARto-PARhMom PARmidde - -
KDAz
89
![Page 103: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Primary production (Produc. mg C m'3 hr'1) is calculated from the phytoplankton
growth rate (JA [hr1]) and concentration (Phyt, mg C m'3):
Produc = n • Phyt
The net source minus sink for tracers is a follows:
dPhyt _,. / , s — = n-Phyt -mortph (Phyt - Phyt^) - sinking
at
dFe _ /J • Phyt reminDet • Det
dt ~ C:Fe C:FeDet
dDet = (Phyt - i%?min ) • mortphyt - reminDst • Det - sinking
dt
where Det is the concentration of detritus, mortp^, is the mortality rate for phytoplankton
(0.01 hr'1), reminVet is the detrital remineralization rate (0.03 d"1) \Arrigo et al., 2003] and
QFe [mg C m'3:nM_Fe] is 5404.
5.2.3 Climate Change Scenarios
To better understand the potential impact of expected changes in environmental
conditions on the Ross Sea polynya ecosystem, we ran a number of model scenarios
including a control run and climate change runs whereby we slowly increased either the
air temperature (3 runs), wind speed (3 runs), or both (1 run) over the next 50 years. The
control run used NCEP reanalysis products for air temperatures and sea-level pressure
(which was used to compute geostrophic winds). To reduce variability in the model, the
same year of forcing data (1 January through 31 December 2000) was cycled for each of
the 50 years of the model runs. This was chosen as a representative year, in lieu of using
a climatology which mutes high wind events. We chose not to force our model with
90
![Page 104: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
output from a global forecast model as we wanted to use simplified and targeted
atmospheric changes to assess the models sensitivity to such variations.
The temperature change runs were based on the global temperature rise projected
by the Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES) emission scenarios. The low
temperature run was based on the mean of a range of SRES scenarios that assume
continued intensive reliance on fossil-fuels and emissions increases (Bl, AIT, B2, A1B
with 2100 C 0 2 concentrations of 600, 700, 800, and 850 ppm, respectively) [IPCC, 2007].
It produced a temperature increase of approximately 1.25°C over 50 years. The
intermediate temperature run was based on the A1FI SRES emission scenarios, the most
pessimistic IPCC scenario, with atmospheric C 0 2 concentrations in 2100 reaching 1550
ppm [IPCC, 2007]. This run increased temperature by 2.5°C in 50 years. The high
temperature run represented the upper extreme for temperature given by the Al FI SRES
emission scenario, increasing temperature by 5°C in 50 years. The atmospheric
temperatures for these three scenarios were increased through time as follows (Figure
5.1a):
AT (year) = 0.025 * (year-2005)
ATfyear) = 0.050 * (year-2005)
ATfyear) = 0.100 * (year-2005)
where ZlTis the increase in temperature above the value for the control run for a given
year of the model run.
Scenarios run to simulate the predicted intensification of peak wind speeds ranged
from a 10 to 100 % increase by 2050. It is not known how much polar wind intensities
may vary in the future. In order to determine an appropriate range for increased wind
91
![Page 105: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
(a)
Temperature Increase Scenarios
— —
-
-5.0°C
2.5°C
-1.25X
(b)
2
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
year
Wind Increase Scenarios
2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
year
Figure 5.1 Increases in (a) temperatures and (b) winds over the 50 years of the model runs
intensities, we investigated wind speeds for a number of stations in the Ross Sea for a
single year. Between stations, the wind differed by between 10% and 300% in the austral
winter and by between 2% and 50% in the austral summer. Additionally, based on
estimates for the tropics, 1°C to 5°C of warming of the surface ocean would lead to
approximately a 5% to 25% increase in peak wind speeds [Emanuel, 1987; Emanuel, 2005].
Russell et al. [2006] used the SRES A1B scenario (a doubling of C 0 2 by 2100, stabilizing at
717) to force the Climate Model version 2.0 (CM2.0) and 2.1 (CM2.1), and predicted that
Southern Hemisphere westerlies will increase by 8% and 9%, respectively. This was used
92
![Page 106: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
as the basis for the low wind increase run (with wind increased by 10%). (Climate Model
2.0 and 2.1 are the Princeton Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory's two coupled
climate models) The other two wind runs are high end sensitivity studies to see how the
system could respond to a 50% increase and a 100% increase in wind speeds. Wind
adjustment factors were calculated as a function of year as follows (Figure 5.1b):
wind'factor(year) — 0.002 * (year - 2000) + 1
windfactor(year) = 0.010 * {year- 2000) + 1
windfactor(year) = 0.020 * (year - 2000) + 1
For the different wind scenarios, the control run winds were multiplied by the wind
factors at each time step. A joint scenario was run by increasing both wind speed and
temperature as follows:
AT (year) - 0.05 * (year-2005)
windfactor(year)= 0.010 * (year- 2000) + 1
This temperature+wind scenario aims to quantify the combined effects of including
increases in both temperature and wind on sea ice distributions and phytoplankton
dynamics.
5.3 Results
5.3.1 Sea Ice
Over the 50 years of the model control run, mean sea ice concentrations over the
model domain oscillated between the summer sea ice minimum of 34-38% and the winter
sea ice maximum of 74-76%, with little interannual variability (Figure 5.2). For the
temperature run, (unless otherwise noted, the 'temperature run' will refer to the
intermediate temperature run and 'wind run' will refer to the intermediate wind run.) the
93
![Page 107: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
85-
80-75-Toes 60
55-50-
45-40-35-
30-25-20-15-
(b) Intermediate Temperature
1 | j 1
| | | | j j | | l i l l l l l i l i i h l l i
111 li ill
1 I
1'
' 11 ' .1
1 1 !
1 In' n li M 'III l i ' 1 i'l
ill! 1 ml
'' P i li
1 1 1 1 i 1 1 ' i ill i III
| | 1 I I 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1
M l | mi it
ill 'I' III 1 I'l' ll 11 lllll
I''' 'ill"1! Iff 1 ,[J ' \ Is
lii'.,. iiiiiir!iii,i'1 limn M r i i> 1 !•' inn11'l'iuiiiiinri 1 i - ! | i i M j
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
year
2000 2005 2010 2016 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
year
Figure 5.2 Sea ice concentration (averaged over the model domain) for the 50 years of the model runs for (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run and (d) temperature+wind run
wintertime maximum varied between 73% and 75%, similar to the control run. However,
the summer minimum decreased from 36% at the beginning of the run to 28% after 50
years, a drop of 22%. Unlike the control run and the temperature run, the wintertime
maximum ice concentration for the wind run declined over the 50 year simulation,
dropping from 75% to 65%, going down by 13%. The summer minimum for this run
also fell, decreasing from 35% (2000-2005) to 27% (2045-2050), a decline of 23% during
the 50 years. Most of the decline occurred in the first 25 years, with the ice
concentrations for this run stabilizing after 2025. The temperature+wind run was
virtually identical to the wind run. The only difference was that the 50 year decrease in
the summer maximum was slightly less than that in the wind run. The similarity between
the wind run and the temperature+wind run means that the impact of temperature and
94
![Page 108: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
78*S
140°E 160°E 180" 160"W 140"W 120°W 140*E IBO'E 180° 160"W 140"W 120*W 140"E 160°E 180* 160*W 140"W120*W 140*£ 160*E 180° 160*W 140eW120eW Longitude Longitude Longitude
60 80 100
Figure 5.3.1 Sea Ice Concentrations (light grey is open water; dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature ran (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run
wind counteract each other. While the temperature run had less sea ice due to increased
stratification, the wind run had less ice due to additional ice advecting out of the area with
increased wind stress, despite the fact that higher winds mix the water column more
deeply and cool the mixed layer. So in the temperature+wind run, the winds bringing up
95
![Page 109: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
•
I ̂ ggg ̂ ljllglj
-Q 66°S
140°E 160'E 180' 160'W 1400W120oW 140*E 160'E 180* 160*W 140'W120*W 140°E 160*E 180* 160°W 140eW120°W 140*E 160°E 180' 160*W 140'W120*W Longitude Longitude Longitude
0 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 5.3.2 Sea Ice Concentrations (light grey is open water; dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run
colder water works to counteract the heating and stratification associated with increased
temperature.
It can be seen (Figure 5.3a and 5.3b) that there is slightly less sea ice in the Ross
Sea for model scenarios with increased temperature. The polynya starts to form in late
November and early December along the western side of the Ross Ice Shelf (RIS). The
96
![Page 110: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
changes in atmospheric forcings do not dramatically influence the modeled formation of
the Ross Sea summertime polynya in December and January, causing it to open only a
little more quickly than it does in the control run. In December, the size of the polynya is
slighdy greater in the temperature run. The ice extent in the east is reduced as well, but
not as much as in the west. This small December polynya expands into a larger polynya
in the next few months. Breakthrough (whereby the polynya becomes contiguous with
the open ocean to the north) begins in January adjacent to the continent along the
western side of the model domain, approximately one month earlier than in the control
run. Additionally, the change in atmospheric forcing only slighdy retarded the closure of
the polynya in the autumn (April and May). Higher temperatures in the temperature run
do not substantially change sea ice cover from June through November.
The wind scenario (Figure 5.3c) shows a similar pattern, but amplified changes
compared to model results from the temperature run. The ice in the western region of
the model domain is dramatically reduced, with most of the ice receding from the
continental coast by 1 December, l ike the temperature run, breakthrough occurs by
January, whereas in the control run it does not occur until February. The ice cover in the
east is significandy reduced as early as December, a pattern that continues through
January and February. As the polynya closes in March and April, there is a narrower
band of ice along the continent in the east. In May, the polynya is fully closed in the
control run, but the northern extent of the ice is not as great in the wind run. Like in the
temperature run, there is an absence of ice along the coast of the continent in the west
and the ice does not reach as far to the north in the east. There are also changes noted in
the winter months of June through October, when increased wind speeds contribute to a
97
![Page 111: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
wintertime polynya that is more persistently open, particularly in August. In August
through January, there is a reduction in sea ice concentrations compared to the control
run in the western section of the model domain (Figure 5.3c).
Changes due to increased temperature and winds are not additive, as can be seen
in the temperature+wind run results (Figure 5.3d). In December, the temperature+wind
ice extent is less than the control run and less than the temperature run, however it is
greater than the wind run. This means that temperature counteracts the effects of
increased winds alone in regards to sea ice (as described above). In January, there is only
slightly more ice in the temperature+wind run than in the wind run, and there continues
to be less ice than in the temperature run. By February and March the temperature+wind
run has slightly less ice than the wind run. The least amount of ice in the
temperature+wind run occurs in April and May as the polynya closes. In May, both the
temperature run and the temperature+wind run contain more open water than the other
runs in the western side of the domain next to the continent. In June and July, the
northern extent of the ice edge is lowest in the temperature+wind run, slightly less than
the wind run. In August, a wintertime polynya develops next to the RIS in the west,
similar to the temperature run. However, by September and October, the ice edge is
further north in the temperature+wind run than in the wind run, and continues as such
into November. In November, there are a couple of lower concentration patches of ice
in the center of the ice expanse in the temperature+wind run, similar to the wind run.
5.3.2 Ocean Temperatures
Ocean mixed layer temperatures in the temperature run reflect warming
atmospheric temperatures by the end of the 50 year run (Figure 5.4). In December, the
98
![Page 112: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
(a) (b) (c) (d)
140-E 160°E 180* 160^140^120*™ 140°E 160°E 180° 160°W 140*W120"W 140*E 160'E 180* 160"W 140*W 120*W 140"E 160°E 180° 160*W 140°W 120BW
Longitude Longitude Longitude Longitude
- 2 - 1 0 1 2
Figure 5.4 Ocean mixed layer temperatures (dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run
mixed layer temperatures in the control run (Figure 5.4a) in the polynya region are
approximately 0.5° - 1.0° cooler than in the temperature run (Figure 5.4b), with virtually
no differences elsewhere. This small temperature decrease is due to the region being
covered with sea ice during the preceding winter and early spring and thus was not
exposed to the warmer air temperatures. During this time, excess atmospheric heat
contributes to ice melt as opposed to ocean warming (as evidenced by the lower ice
concentrations in the region in December, Figure 5.3.1). This changes by March, when
surface waters have been ice-free for approximately three months and temperatures
throughout the polynya region are 1.0° - 1.5° warmer than in the control run.
99
![Page 113: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Additionally, in the northern region of the domain, where the ocean remains ice-free all
year, the warm ocean waters extend further south than in the control run from December
through June.
Likewise, ocean mixed layer temperatures respond to the increasing winds in the
wind run by the end of the 50 years (Figure 5.4c). For this run in December, the mixed
layer in the polynya is slightly cooler than both the control run (approximately 0.5°C
cooler) and the temperature run (approximately 1°C cooler). Higher winds mix surface
waters more deeply, bringing up cooler waters from below in the polynya region and
spreading the surface heat over a larger volume of water. Surface temperature is
decreased by 0.75°C in the polynya region in March in the wind run. Again this is likely
due to the increased winds breaking down water column stratification in the polynya
region. Also notable is that warm surface waters (-1°C to +1°C) extend further south in
the east for the wind run. The explanation for this is that increased wind intensities,
particularly during the winter north of the ice edge, cause deeper mixing, in this case
bringing up heat from below (in the form of warm Circumpolar Deep Water, CDW) and
warming the mixed layer. In June, the polynya region is very similar in temperature to the
control run. Again in September there is a noticeable difference in the mixed layer
temperature in the northeast; once more likely due to the mixing up of warm CDW. The
polynya region is ice covered at this time of year and exhibits no difference from the
control run in this area.
In general, the ocean mixed layer is warmer in the temperature+wind run than in
the control run, but not as warm as the temperature run (Figure 5.4). In the east in
September and December, just north of the ice edge, the temperature of the
100
![Page 114: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
temperature+wind run is cooler than in the wind run, and is more similar to the control
run. While the increased winds cool the polynya and counteract the warming effect of
increased atmospheric temperatures, in the northeast, increased winds make the ocean
warmer. In order of temperature in the polynya (December through March), the wind
run is the coolest, followed by the control run, the temperature+wind run, and then the
temperature run.
5.3.3 Primary Productivity
In all of the model simulations, the phytoplankton bloom began in mid-
November and primary production peaked very quickly in early December (Figure 5.5).
In the control tun, peak daily production (spatially averaged for all shelf waters less than
800 m depth, Figure 5.6) reached 2.66 g C m-2 d-1 during the week of 7 December
(Table 1). For the temperature run, the bloom developed more quickly but reached a
peak rate of primary production of only 2.18 g C m-2 d-1, significantly less than in the
control run. This is due to the smaller spatial extent of the bloom at its peak for the
temperature run (Figure 5.5). The wind run exhibited production rates that were lower
than in the control run, but the bloom covered a larger area near its peak (the week of 7
Table 5.1 Comparison of peak daily, mean daily, and annual primary production
Region All shelf waters (<800 m) [Arrigo et al. 2003] All shelf waters (<800 m), this study: control All shelf waters (<800 m), this study: temperature** All shelf waters (<800 m), this study: wind** All shelf waters (<800 m), this study: both**
Peak Daily Mean Daily Production Production* g C m"2 d"1 g C m"2 d"1
1.28 2.66 2.18 2.76 1.99
0.54 0.85 0.78 0.98 0.90
Annual Primary
Production g C m~2 yr"1
145 127 117 147 135
*Mean daily production is calculated for the time period 1 November through 1 April. **'temperature' and 'wind' refer to the intermediate increased run, respectively, 'both' refers to the increased temperature and wind run
![Page 115: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
170°E 180' 170°W 160*W
Longitude
170°E 180e 170°W 160*W
Longitude
170BE 180" W W 160°W
Longitude
170eE 180' 170*W 160"W
Longitude
0.1 [gCm^d1]
Figure 5.5 Primary Production (dark grey is the continent) (a) control run (b) intermediate temperature run (c) intermediate wind run (d) temperature+wind run
December). As a result, the wind run had a peak daily production of 2.76 g C m-2 d-1,
the highest of the four model runs discussed here. The phytoplankton bloom in the
temperature+wind run developed more rapidly than in the other runs, yet had a peak
daily production of just 1.99 g C m-2 d-1, die lowest of the four model runs. Production
![Page 116: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Date
Figure 5.6 Primary production time series
increased more quickly in this model run, similarly to the temperature run, because of a
slightly warmer mixed layer and increased stratification earlier in the season leading to
higher growth rates and biomass. The temperature+wind run had even higher
production early in the season than the temperature run because the increased winds in
the early spring mix nutrients into the surface waters, while at the same time, warmer
temperatures stratify the mixed layer.
Annual primary production is highest (for these 4 model runs) for the wind run at
147 g C m"2 yrA (for all shelf waters <800 m). Maximum daily rates of production are not
103
![Page 117: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
as high as in some of the other runs, but this is compensated for by its larger spatial
coverage. The explanation for this is that increased winds mix the water column more
deeply in early spring prior to the bloom, bringing up nutrients (iron) from depth,
allowing the bloom to persist longer and expand over a larger area. Annual production is
similar for the control run and the temperature+wind run at 135 g C m 2 yr"1. This is in
part because increased temperatures and increased winds have a counteracting effect on
annual production because high winds tend to bring more nutrients to the surface while
higher temperatures increase stratification and reduce nutrient supply. This latter effect
can be seen clearly in the temperature run where annual production (117 g C m 2 yr"1) is
8% lower than in the control run.
5.3.4 Sensitivity to the Magnitude of Changes
Not surprisingly, sea ice extent, ocean mixed layer temperature, and primary
productivity were sensitive to changes in the magnitude of the air temperature and wind
speed changes during the 50 year simulation (Figure 5.7). Sea ice concentration (1
January) declined in response to increased temperature changes after 50 years. Loss of ice
was particularly evident in the western portion of the model domain (140°E-180°),
northwest of the main polynya (where ice concentrations dropped from approximately
40% to 0 between the control run and the low temperature run). The response to higher
temperatures was not large and it was fairly linear (loss of approximately 5% of ice
between runs as temperatures increased).
The change in January ice due to altered wind speed, however, was not linear.
The sea ice concentration in the low wind scenario was very similar to the control run.
However, in the intermediate wind scenario, sea ice concentrations decline substantially
104
![Page 118: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
140"E 160"E 180* 160°W 140tWt20"W140''E 160"E 180' 160'W 140"W 120°W 140*E 160°E 180* 160SW 140°W 120°W
Longitude Longitude Longitude
0 20 40 60 80 100
78*S
140°E 160*E
140*E 160"E 180° leO'W 140*WI20*W14O'E 160*E 180* 160*W 140°W 120'W 140eE 160'E 180" 160°W 140*W 120*W
Longitude Longitude Longitude
17CE 180' 170°W 160°W
Longitude
170°E 180' 170"W 160°W 170«£ 180" 170*W 160*W
Longitude Longitude
0.1 [gcm-^d-1]
Figure 5.7 Model results from the low, intermediate, and high model scenarios for temperature and wind of (a) January sea ice concentrations (b) February ocean mixed layer temperatures and (c) December (peak) primary production (light grey is open water; dark grey is the continent; light blue is the RIS)
![Page 119: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
compared to the control run. As the winds increased further in the high wind run, there
was very little change from the intermediate wind run. The size of the polynya under
different wind scenarios represents a balance between increased wind mixing bringing up
cooler waters (retarding ice melt) and increased wind advecting more ice out of the
region. Between the intermediate and high wind runs, this balance is such that the size of
the polynya changes very little (<5%).
Ocean mixed layer temperatures (1 February) warmed substantially in response to
increasing temperature by the end of the 50 year model runs. In the polynya region, there
was a significant increase (~ 0.75°C) between the low temperature run and the
intermediate temperature run, as well as between the intermediate and the high
temperature runs (~1°C). In die high temperature run, warmer waters (>2°C) in the
northern part of the model domain extended further south than in the other runs. In the
three different wind runs, changes in temperature were much smaller than in the
temperature runs. In the polynya region, the mixed layer temperatures were essentially
the same (~0.5°C) for die control run and die low and intermediate wind runs. For the
high wind run, sea surface temperatures were noticeably lower in die polynya, averaging
around -1°C. This decrease in temperature helps explain why there was not a substantial
reduction in sea ice from the intermediate to high wind runs.
Despite the changes in both sea ice concentration and mixed layer temperature at
higher atmospheric temperatures and wind speeds, peak primary productivity (on 7
December) changed very litde between the low, intermediate, and high air temperature
runs (2.64, 2.18, 2.38 g C m"2 d"1, respectively), but much more so in the wind runs (3.82,
2.76, and 2.48 g C m 2 d~\ respectively). Primary productivity in the low temperature run
106
![Page 120: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
(2.64 g C m~2 d"1) was essentially the same as in the control ran (2.67 g C m"2 dA). The
intermediate temperature run had lower peak productivity (2.18 g C m"2 d"1) than the
control run, and the bloom was shifted slightly to the north. In the high temperature run,
the bloom was shifted even farther to the north than the intermediate run and peak
production was also slightly lower than in the control run (2.38 g C m 2 d"1).
There were much more pronounced changes in primary production for the
different wind runs. For the low wind run, there was significantly higher peak production
(3.82 g C m"2 d"1) than for any of the other runs. This is due to a balance of mixing
nutrients up to the surface early in the season and not breaking down stratification. In
the intermediate wind run, a reduction in maximum productivity was compensated for by
the larger extent of the bloom. In the high wind run, the bloom (when the other runs
peaked, 7 December) was not only more muted, but also covered a smaller area, leading
to substantially lower production at this time. The peak production was delayed until
later in the season (27 December), at which point the run reached a similar value of peak
production (2.48 g C m"2 d"1).
5.4 Discussion
5.4.1 Southern Ocean Sea Ice
During the IPCC [2007] study, a range of models was used to simulate Arctic and
Antarctic sea ice extent until the year 2100 for a number of different emission scenarios
[IPCC, 2007]. These models found that the reduction in ice extent in the Southern
Hemisphere was much greater in magnitude for July through September (approximately
2.5 x 106 km2 of 17.7 x 106 km2, or 14% in 50 yr) than in January through March
(approximately 1.0 x 106 km2 of 3.9 x 106 km2, or 25% in 50 yr), but lower on a
107
![Page 121: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
percentage basis. Like the IPCC results, our model predicts similar winter changes in ice
extent for the wind and temperature+wind runs (13%, and 11%, respectively) and less for
the temperature run (0%). Additionally, our model predicts the same percent ice loss
during the summer (a drop of 22%, 23%, and 26% for temperature, wind and
temperature+wind runs) as the IPCC change in ice extent from January through March.
There are some differences between the models that make direct comparisons somewhat
difficult. First, the IPCC models are not of high enough resolution to capture the Ross
Sea polynya, so for the most part, all of the changes in sea ice extent are due to changes
of the northern ice extent. Thus, any ice loss in the polynya region would not be
captured by the IPCC models. Second, the IPCC models contain a higher percentage of
open ocean (north of the ice extent) exposed to warmer temperatures year round.
Warming of the air overlying the surface of the ice, which is already very cold, contributes
little to ice melt. A much larger component of ice melt is attributable to warming of
ocean water. Seawater has a much lower albedo than sea ice, and thus, warms more than
ice does from solar radiation. Since there is a bigger impact of ocean heat than air
temperatures on sea ice, a larger percent of model domain that is open ocean exposed to
heating could contribute to greater ice melt in the IPCC results. However this is highly
dependent on ocean circulation patterns.
In addition to affecting heating of ocean waters below, changes in ice cover
affects air-sea gas exchange. A reduction in sea ice extent, as occurs through the
formation of wintertime polynyas, has implications for the exchange of C 0 2 between the
ocean and the atmosphere [Sweeney et al, 2000]. A wintertime polynya forms immediately
north of the western side of the RIS during most of the runs. The temperature run
108
![Page 122: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
wintertime polynya is largest in August, and is similar in size to the polynya in the
temperature+wind run (also in August). By September, the polynya in the temperature
run is still approximately the same size. In the wind run, the polynya is completely closed
in September and the polynya in the temperature+wind run shrinks noticeably. However,
by October, it is the wind run that has the most open water in that region. The high
winds that keep the polynya open in the winter also lead to high rates of gas exchange.
Compared with ice covered waters, gas fluxes per unit area in the open water of these
winter polynyas can be very large. Since the polynyas open up in August and their area is
relatively small, they do not contribute gready to the overall annual net flux of gases
(between the atmosphere and the ocean) in the Ross Sea. The annual net flux of C 0 2 is
as high as -2.9 mol C m"2 in the Ross Sea, however, most of this flux occurs between
December and March \Arrigo and Van Dijken, 2007]. In the autumn and winter, die
release of C 0 2 from the ocean into the atmosphere is 0.05 to 0.09 mol m"2 yr"1 \Arrigo and
Van Dijken, 2007]. Recent evidence suggests that Antarctic continental shelves have high
biological drawdown of C 0 2 \Arrigo et al, submitted] and that Southern Ocean storage of
anthropogenic C 0 2 is likely higher than was previously believed \LJJ Monaco et al, 2005].
However, there is litde evidence that wintertime polynyas play a significant role in
Southern Ocean C uptake.
5.4.2 Arctic and Antarctic Differences
In the IPCC model runs mentioned previously, ice loss is predicted to be greater
in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere. In some projections,
late-summer ice in the Arctic is predicted to disappear almost entirely by the latter part of
the 21st century. Some models predict a tipping point in the Arctic in as little as 40 years
109
![Page 123: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
[Lindsay and Zhang, 2005; Winton, 2006] at which time sea ice will disappear completely
during the summer. This is expected to occur in large part due to positive feedbacks with
the albedo affect. Because the open water of the ocean has a much lower albedo than the
ice, the more waters become ice free, the more rapidly warming occurs. It is likely that
the Antarctic has a similar sort of tipping point, after which summer sea ice significantly
drops and then verges on disappearing in a region. Although our model shows does not
suggest that a tipping point will occur in the Ross Sea within the next 50 years, we cannot
rule out the possibility that such a tipping point may occur after that time. Unlike the
Arctic, where sea ice is centralized over the pole, sea ice in the Antarctic encircles the
continent and is found at very different latitudes that are exposed to varying localized
climates. These regional differences could lead to sea ice tipping points happening at
different times around the continent. It has already been observed that ice loss is much
greater along the Antarctic Peninsula, the northernmost part of Antarctica.
Another reason that Antarctic sea ice concentrations have changed little
compared to the Arctic, and are predicted to change to a smaller extent in the future, may
be due to the sluggish warming of the Southern Ocean compared to the Arctic [IPCC,
2007]. In the Ross Sea, sea ice concentrations associated with the polynya have been
shown to be affected by ocean temperatures as well as winds \Reddy et al, 2007]. Because
the ocean is such a large reservoir, there is a lag between changes in atmospheric
temperature and the same degree of warming in the ocean. However, the magnitude of
this lag is likely to differ for these two polar regions due to their large differences in
bathymetry. In particular, the Arctic is generally shallower (average depth 1000 m), with
much of the basin occupied by continental shelf. This leaves it more susceptible to
110
![Page 124: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
heating by warmer air temperatures than the Southern Ocean, which is much deeper
(average depth 4000-5000 m). Mixing in the Southern ocean throughout the year spreads
the heat throughout a deep water column. Furthermore, the Antarctic continental
shelves remain ice covered throughout much of the year, limiting their exposure to
atmospheric influences. Model results for the increased wind runs show a signature of
cooling in surface waters in die polynya (however, to the northeast, it does show
warming; this is caused by the mixing up of warm CDW). If the scenario was run for the
Arctic, where waters on the continental shelves are ice free for a longer time and exposed
to solar radiation earlier in the season, the increased wind runs may not have exhibited
the same degree of cooling. Similarly, our increased temperature runs likely would have
exhibited greater warming over the continental shelf since they were ice free longer as
those in the Arctic.
In addition to warmer atmospheric temperatures, declines in Arctic ice cover have
been attributed in part to the advection of warm water into the Arctic ocean from the
Pacific [Maslowski et al., 2001; Shimada et al., 2006] and Atlantic [Dickson et al., 2000; Steele
and Boyd, 1998]. Unlike the Arctic Ocean, a shallow basin surrounded by land with warm
water inflows, the Antarctic is bordered by deep continental shelves and the Antarctic
Circumpolar Current (ACQ. We have not seen as much change in Antarctic coastal
waters as compared to Arctic waters in part because we have made fewer observations
there.
5.4.3 Response of Biological Systems to Changes in Physical Systems
Our peak daily production rates agree well with Arrigo et al. [2003], who estimate
that peak daily production is 1.28 g C m"2 d"1 for all shelf waters less than 800 m (Table 1).
I l l
![Page 125: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Annual production oi Arrigo et al. [2003] is 145 g C m 2 yr"1, which is in the same range as
our estimates. The timing of the spring blooms also agree well (Figure 5.6), with daily
production peaking in early December in both the study by Arrigo et al. [2003] and ours.
One difference is that after the peak of the spring bloom, our model predicts that primary
production will drop off more quickly in December than was reported by Arrigo et al.
[2003]. In both studies, primary production declines steadily from January until late
March. The peak and then drop-off in our model estimates reflect the boom and bust
nature of the modeled bloom in the central Ross Sea. This depletes nutrients in the
bloom region and production rapidly declines. Nutrients are not depleted on the margins
of the original bloom, allowing for production to take place in these regions. This results
in spatially averaged daily production staying fairly steady throughout the summer, as the
bloom expands outward into nutrient-rich waters.
In general, warmer waters will increase phytoplankton growth rates, and it is
expected that levels of production will be higher. However, we do not see this reflected
in mean daily production or the annual production for all of the temperature runs, which
exhibits rates that are lower than those in the wind and temperature+wind runs. It is
notable that mean daily production is higher in late November for the high and
intermediate temperature run. The increase in production early in the season is
outweighed in part by slightly lower peak daily production and lower daily production
throughout the season thereafter. The changes from the control run to all three
temperature runs are not very large (<20%), perhaps due to the limited changes in ocean
temperatures (<0.5°C change) in the polynya region this early in the season. Modeled
ocean temperatures (for the intermediate temperature run) do not substantially increase
112
![Page 126: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
above the control run (by more than 0.5°C change) until January and February, with
considerably warmer water (1.5°C change) in the polynya region by March (Figure 5.4).
In the intermediate wind run, ocean temperatures are slightly cooler in the
polynya in both the early part of the season (December, Figure 5.4) and later on (March,
Figure 5.4). The effect of this on the bloom is that it does not reach the high levels of
peak production predicted in the control run, although its spatially averaged peak daily
production is greater due to a larger bloom extent. This greater spatial extent of the
bloom is attributable to increased winds in the early spring mixing nutrients into the
surface waters creating a more muted bloom but over a larger area. At the time of peak
daily production and thereafter in the season, this intermediate increase wind run has the
highest daily production levels of any of the four run discussed here (control run,
intermediate temperature run, intermediate wind run, temperature+wind run). It follows
that annual production is the highest for the intermediate wind run than for any of the
four runs (147 g C m 2 yr"1). This is due to deeper mixing increasing nutrient supply to
the surface waters outweighing cooler mixed layer temperature in the polynya.
It has already been observed that in some marine systems, shifts in the ranges and
abundance of algal, plankton, and fish populations are associated with rising water
temperatures and related changes in ice cover, salinity, oxygen levels and circulation
[Beaugrandetal, 2002; Chave^et al, 2003; Richardson andSchoeman, 2004]. The Arctic has
experienced a 27.5 Tg C yr4 increase in primary productivity over the past five years due
to both a decrease in the summer minimum sea ice extent and the longer ice-free growing
season \Arrigo et al, submitted]. In our model results, we do not see a marked change in
primary production in the Ross Sea, in large part because there is not a significant
113
![Page 127: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
reduction in the summer minimum ice extent or extension of the ice-free growing season.
Our modeled productivity develops very quickly in early December and then dies out
quite rapidly by the end of the month, and then stays at a moderate level until early April.
Due to the long tail at the end of the bloom, productivity would likely increase if the
polynya were to remain open longer, as has been observed in the Arctic \Arrigo et al,
submitted], unless the effect of increased wind causes a drop in production, as we predict
in our high wind run. If winds are not strong enough to inhibit the bloom, an extended
growing season would prolong the bloom if nutrients were not drawn down completely
and there was still an adequate amount of light. If nutrient were depleted, an extension of
the ice-free growing season may allow enough time for remineralization, fueling a
secondary bloom. However, we do not see a dramatic change in the timing of polynya
closure in any of our simulations. In order to prolong the phytoplankton bloom, the ice-
free growing season would need to be significantly longer than what we have predicted.
If future climatic changes alter nutrient supply to the summertime polynya (such as by
higher temperature increasing stratification or greater wind speeds deepening mixing), in
addition to lengthening the ice-free growing season, we could expect to see an increase in
production. On the other hand, the bloom may be shortened if the higher peak levels of
production associated with warmer temperature exhaust nutrients sooner.
5.5 Conclusions
Model results suggest that with increasing air temperature, sea ice extent will be
reduced slightly, mixed layer ocean temperatures will warm by a few degrees in the
polynya region, and peak primary production will decrease slightly. With increasing in
wind speeds, sea ice concentrations will drop slightly with a small (10%) increase in
114
![Page 128: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
winds, and more substantially with a moderate (50%) or large (100%) increase. Ocean
temperature in the polynya will stay almost the same in response to a small increase in
winds and then drop slighdy with a larger increase. Increased winds lead to a more
muted bloom that covers a larger area except when the model is run with very high wind
speeds (100% increase) at which point the bloom is delayed almost a month.
It is obvious that the scenarios run in this study are simplifications of changes that
are likely to actually occur with climate change. It is expected that both air temperatures
and winds speed will increase, but also that the pattern of winds may be altered [Russell et
a/., 2006], which may play a role in determining sea ice concentrations and primary
productivity in the Ross Sea. Additionally, in the future, there will be changes not
discussed here such as physical conditions and pressures on Antarctic ecosystems. For
example, we did not include atmospheric changes such as clouds or ocean changes such
as advection of different water masses from outside of die domain. Ecosystem pressures
include ocean acidification, which is expected to have negative impacts on calcium
carbonate shell-forming organisms such as pteropods.
We predict that changes in sea ice and primary production will be smaller than
those that have been observed in the Arctic, with no indication of a tipping point during
the 50 year model run. This is likely the result of differences in topography between the
two regions, particularly the greater depth of the Antarctic shelves and basins, the
relatively enclosed boundaries and warm water inflow into the Arctic Ocean, and the
regional differences in climate that characterize the Antarctic continent.
115
![Page 129: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
CHAPTER 6 Conclusions
The research presented here has helped to paint a picture of ocean circulation in
the Ross Sea using techniques involving quantities as varied as chlorophyll, sea ice, and
oceanic CFCs. From these studies we corroborate earlier findings that warm MCDW
moves onto the shelf and through deep mixing in the winter, inhibits ice growth and thus
contributes to the polynya opening in the summer. This water mass is also studied using
CFCs as a tracer, with model results showing that plumes of warm, low-CFC water enter
the Ross Ice Shelf (RIS) cavity year-round, originating from off of the shelf. This mode
in which MCDW directly enters the ice shelf cavity is observed some of the time in field
observations. Its importance should not be undervalued, as the presence of this warm
water could have a destabilizing effect on the RIS. Finally, patterns observed in an
analysis of satellite chlorophyll, as well as supporting modeling work, show that the
geostrophic nature of the flow of polar waters in the Ross Sea pushes water onto the
shelf and around shoals, with a connection from the bottom of the water column to the
top that leads to a signature of bathymetry on these intrusions in surface waters.
This dissertation represents a significant contribution to our understanding of
the oceanographic system in the Ross Sea. Specifically, it has expanded our scientific
knowledge of:
• MCDW and Phytoplankton Blooms. Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW)
is a water mass located offshore of the Antarctic continent that is warm,
high in nutrients, and low in CFCs. Contrary to what has been suggested
116
![Page 130: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
previously, model results show that Modified Circumpolar Deep Water
(MCDW) is not entrained into the surface layer in the summer and
contribute nutrients to the phytoplankton bloom at this time of year.
Rather, MCDW appears to mix into the surface layer only during the winter,
minimizing its potential impact on phytoplankton dynamics.
• Extent of the Ross Sea Phytoplankton Bloom. Highly productive
waters of the Ross Sea are confined to the continental shelf by the
geostrophic flow of offshore waters that have low chlorophyll and iron
concentrations. Interannual variability in the maximum extent of the bloom
may result from a balance between the availability of iron from deep mixing
on the shelf and the strength of geostrophic circulation along the shelf
break. Previous studies suggested that biological activity is enhanced by the
movement of nutrient-rich CDW onto the continental shelf. Instead, we
suggest that there is a reorganization of surface flow rather than
entrainment of high iron containing intermediate waters into the surface,
and diat instead of offshore waters contributing to biological production (by
entrainment of deep water high in nutrients), they likely inhibit it (by
intrusion of surface water low in nutrients).
• Formation and Evolution of the Ross Sea Polynya. In agreement with
current scientific understanding, model results suggest that both thermal
and mechanical sea processes contribute to the formation of the Ross Sea
polynya. However, model results show that wind-forced sea ice motion
plays the primary role in polynya formation, with entrainment of warm
117
![Page 131: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
MCDW into the surface layer during the winter (when it retards the growth
of ice) playing a relatively minor role.
• Residence Time & Basal Melting. By modeling CFC distributions in the
Ross Sea, we estimated the residence time of water in the RIS cavity to be
2.2 years. More importantiy, the model predicts a mode of circulation,
observed occasionally in field data, in which MCDW directly enters the RIS
cavity and contributes to a basal melting rate of 10 cm yr"1. This flow of
warm water into the RIS cavity could have grave impacts on future melting
of the ice shelf, especially in light of increases in water temperature expected
in response to global warming.
• Future Projections. Model runs projecting 50 years into the future under
scenarios of increased temperatures and winds reveals that there is slighdy
less sea ice both during the austral summer and year-round (a decrease in
the summer minima ice extent by 14% and 22%, respectively). The
wintertime polynya along the edge of the RIS is larger in both scenarios.
Primary production is forecast to change in magnitude and timing, but only
slighdy. Increasing temperatures leads to a stronger peak bloom that ends
more quickly due to nutrient limitation. On the other hand, increased winds
lead to a more muted bloom. It is also possible diat such changes in
physical conditions will lead to a shift in plankton community structure and
could have more widespread ecological impacts than solely altering the
magnitude of the bloom.
118
![Page 132: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
In light of the recent changes observed around the globe and those that are
expected in the future, expanding our understanding of important and vulnerable Earth
systems is critical. The Ross Sea is an ecologically active region, with one of the largest
polar phytoplankton blooms, and with a complex web of upper trophic level organisms
that it supports. As a polar region, it is expected to be especially vulnerable to climate
warming. In our study of the impact of winds and temperature on sea ice and
productivity, we do not predict major changes in the next 50 years. However, a close
watch will have to be kept on the RIS and its melt rates and stability. Our current
understanding of the mass balance of the ice shelf is very limited. If temperatures warm
enough, it could have catastrophic consequences for the ice shelf. One avenue for its
destruction could be an input of warm water into the cavity, originating from offshore as
CDW. However, if this flow of warm water were to intensify in volume or frequency in
the future under warming conditions, it could contribute substantially to the melt of the
ice shelf. The ice shelf, because it is floating, will not contribute significantly to sea level
rise if it melts. However, if it disintegrates in part or entirely, it will no longer inhibit
continental ice from flowing into the ocean, and thus would alter sea level dramatically.
In the research presented here, we add to our collective understanding of the
Ross Sea system. Hopefully, through this work, we have made it easier for scientists in
the future to track ocean circulation, evaluate ice shelf melting, study polynya formation,
assess phytoplankton and ecosystems, and understand causes and predict consequences
of future environmental change, both in the Ross Sea, and elsewhere in the world.
119
![Page 133: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
References
Ackley, S. F., J. L. Bengtson, P. Boveng, M. Castellini, K. L. Daly, S.Jacobs, G. L. Kooyman, J. Laake, L. Quetin, R. Ross, D. B. Siniff, B. S. Stewart, I. Stirling, J. Torres and P. K. Yochem (2003), A top-down, multidisciplinary study of the structure and function of the pack-ice ecosystem in the eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica, Polar Rec, 39, 219-230.
Ainley, D. G., E. D. Clarke, K. R. Arrigo, W. R. Fraser, A. Kate, K. J. Barton and P. R. Wilson (2005), Decadal-scale changes in the climate and biota of the Pacific sector of the Southern Ocean, 1950s to the 1990s, Antarct, Sci., 17(2), 171-182, doi:10.1017/S0954102005002567.
Ainley, D. G., R. C. Wood and W. J. L. Sladen (1978), Bird life at Cape Crozier Ross Island, Wilson Bull., 90, 492-510.
Anderson, J. B., C. F. Brake and N. C. Myers (1984), Sedimentation on the Ross Sea Continental Shelf, Antarctica, Marine Geol., 57, 295-333.
Aoyanagi, M. and K. Ueda (1989), Report of the First International Conference on Penguins Dunedin New Zealand, Antarc. Rec, 33, 88-95.
Arrigo, K. R, G. R. DiTullio, R. B. Dunbar, D. H. Robinson, M. L. Van Woert, D. L. Worthen and M. P. Lizotte (2000), Phytoplankton taxonomic variability in nutrient utilization and primary production in the Ross Sea,/. Geophys. Res., 105, 8827-8846.
Arrigo, K. R., D. H. Robinson, R. B. Dunbar, A. R. Leventer and M. P. Lizotte (2003), Physical control of chlorophyll a, POC, and TPN distributions in the pack ice of the Ross Sea, Antarctica,/. Geophys. Res., 108(C10), 1007-1021, doi:10.1029/2001JC00113.
Arrigo, K. R., D. H. Robinson, D. L. Worthen, R. B. Dunbar, G. R. DiTullio, M. L. Van Woert and M. P. Lizotte (1999), Phytoplankton community structure and the drawdown of nutrients and C 0 2 in the Southern Ocean, Science, 283, 365-367.
Arrigo, K. R. and G. L. Van Dijken (2007), Interannual variation in air-sea C 0 2 flux in the Ross Sea, Antarctica: a model analysis, Journal of GeophsicalResearch-Part C-Oceans, 112,16.
Arrigo, K. R. and G. L. van Dijken (2003a), Impact of iceberg C-19 on Ross Sea primary production, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(16), 1836, doi:10.1029/2003GL017721.
Arrigo, K. R. and G. L. van Dijken (2003b), Phytoplankton dynamics within 37 Antarctic coastal polynya systems,/. Geophys. Res., 108(C8), 3271, doi:10.1029/2002JC001739.
120
![Page 134: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Arrigo, K. R. and G. L. van Dijken (2004), Annual changes in sea-ice, chlorophyll a, and primary production in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, Deep Sea Res. II, 5/(1-3), 117-138, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2003.04.003.
Arrigo, K. R., G. L. van Dijken and S. Pabi (submitted), The impact of a shrinking Arctic ice cover on marine primary production, Geophys. Res. Lett.
Arrigo, K. R., A. M. Weiss and W. O. Smith (1998), Physical forcing of phytoplankton dynamics in the southwestern Ross Sea,/. Geophys. Res., 103,1007-1021.
Arrigo, K. R, D. L. Worthen and D. H. Robinson (2003), A coupled ocean-ecosystem model of the Ross Sea: 2. Iron regulation of phytoplankton taxonomic variability and primary production,/. Geophys. Res., 108(CT), 3231, doi:10.1029/2001JC000856.
Arrigo, K. R., D. L. Worthen, A. Schnell and M. P. Lizotte (1998), Primary production in Southern Ocean waters,/. Geophys. Res., 103(C8), 15587-600.
Assmann, K., H. H. Hellmer and A. Beckmann (2003), Seasonal variation in circulation and water mass distribution on the Ross Sea continental shelf, Antarct. Set., 15(1), 3-ll,doi:10.1017/S0954102003001007.
Bates, N. R., D. A. Hansell, C. A. Carlson and L. I. Gordon (1998), Distribution of C 0 2
species, estimates of net community production, and air-sea C 0 2 exchange in the Ross Seapolynya,/ Geophys. Res., 103, 2883-2896.
Beaugrand, G., P. C. Reid, F. Ibanez, J. A. Lindley and M. Edwards (2002), Reorganization of North Atlantic marine copepod biodiversity and climate, Science (Washington D C), 296(5513), 1692-1694.
Bentley, C. R. and K. C. Jezek (1981), RISS, RISP AND RIGGS - Post-IGY glaciological investigations of the Ross Ice Shelf in the US Programme, J.KSocN.Z., 11(A), 355-372.
Bindoff, N. L., G. D. Williams and I. Allison (2001), Sea-ice growth and water-mass modification in the Mertz Glacier polynya, East Antarctica, during winter, Ann. Glaciol, 33, 399-406.
Bleck, R. and L. T. Smith (1990), A wind-driven isopyenic coordinate model of the North and equatorial Atlantic Ocean. 1. Model development and supporting experiments, /. Geophys. Res., 95, 3273-3285.
Blumberg A. F. and G. L. Mellor (1987), A Description of a Three-dimensional Coastal Ocean Circulation Model, in Three Dimensional Coastal Ocean Models, edited by N. S. Heaps, pp. 1-16, AGU, Washington, D.C.
Brohan, P., J. J. Kennedy, I. Harris, S. F. B. Tett and P. D.Jones (2006), Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: A new data set from 1850, Journal of'Geophysical'Research'Atmospheres, 111, D12106.
121
![Page 135: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Bromwich, D. H., J. F. Carrasco and R. Y. Tzeng (1993), Hemispheric atmospheric variations and oceanographic impacts associated with katabatic surges across the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica,/. Geophys. Res., 98,13045-13062.
Bromwich, D. H. and D. D. Kurtz (1984), Katabatic wind forcing of the Terra Nova Bay polynya,/. Geophys, Res., 89, 3561-3572.
Bromwich D. H., Z. Liu, A. N. Rogers and M. L. Van Woert (1998), Winter atmospheric forcing of the Ross Sea Polynya, in Ocean, Ice and Atmosphere: Interactions at the Antarctic Continental Margin, Antarct. Res. Ser., vol. 75, edited by S. S. Jacobs and R. F. Weiss, pp. 101-133, AGU, Washington, D.C.
Bromwich, D. H., A. J. Monaghan, A. N. Rogers, M. L. Van Woert and K. R. Arrigo (2001), Atmospheric forcing of the Ross Sea polynya during summer, The 6th
Conference on Polar Meteorology and Oceanography and the 11th Conference on Interaction of the Sea and Atmosphere, Am. Meteorol. Soc, San Diego, Calif., 14-18 May.
Bu, X. and M.J. Warner (1995), Solubility of Chlorofluorocarbon-113 in Water and Seawater, Deep Sea Res. I, 42(7), 1151-1161.
Buffoni, G., A. Cappelletti and P. Picco (2002), An investigation of thermohaline circulation in Terra Nova Bay polynya, Antarct. Sci., 14(1), 83-92, doi:10.1017/S0954102002000615.
Caldeira, K. and P. B. Duffy (2000), The role of the Southern Ocean in uptake and storage of anthropogenic carbon dioxide, Science, 287(5453), 620-2.
Chavez, F. P., J. Ryan, S. E. Iiuch-Cota and N. C. Miguel (2003), Climate: From anchovies to sardines and back: Multidecadal change in the Pacific Ocean, Science (Washington D C), 299(5604), 217-221.
Clarke A. and N. M. Johnston (2003), Antarctic marine benthic diversity, in Oceanography and Marine Biology, vol. 41, edited by R. N. Gibson and R. J. A. Atkinson, pp. 47-114, Aberdeen University Press, London.
Coale, K. H., R. M. Gordon and X. J. Wang (2005), The distribution and behavior of dissolved and particulate iron and zinc in the Ross Sea and Antarctic circumpolar current along 170 DGW, Deep Sea Res., Parti, 52, 295-318.
Cochlan, W. P., D. A. Bronk and K. H. Coale (2002), Trace metals and nitrogenous nutrition of Antarctic phytoplankton: experimental observations in the Ross Sea, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 49, 3365-3390.
Comiso, J. C , C. R. McClain, C. W. Sullivan, J. P. Ryan and C. L. Leonard (1993), Costal Zone Color Scanner pigment concentrations in the Southern Ocean and relationships to geophysical surface features,/. Geophys. Res., 98, 2419-2451.
![Page 136: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Court, G. S., L. S. Davies, S. Focardi, R. Bargargli, C. Fossi, C. Leonzio and L. Marili (1997), Chlorinated hydrocarbons in the tissues of South Polar Skuas (Catharacta maccormicki) and Adelie Penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) from Ross Sea, Antarctica, Environ. Poll., 97, 295-301.
Darby, M. S., A. J. Willmott and T. A. Somerville (1995), On die influence of coastline orientation on the steady state width of a latent heat polynya,/. Geophys. Res., WO, 13625-13633.
Dare, R. A. and B. W. Atkinson (2000), Atmospheric response to spatial variations in concentration and size of polynyas in the Southern Ocean sea-ice zone, Bound-Layer Meteorol., 94(1), 65-88, doi:10.1023/A:1002442212593.
Davis, A. M.J. and R. T. McNider (1997), The development of Antarctic katabatic winds and implications for the coastal ocean,/. Atmos. Set., 54,1248-1261.
Deliberty, T. L. and C. A. Geiger (2005), Temporal and Regional Variations in Sea Ice Thickness in the Ross Sea during 1995 and 1998 , 8th Conference on Polar Meteorology and Oceanography, Am. Meteorol. Soc, San Diego, Calif., 9-13 January.
Dery, S. J. and L. B. Tremblay (2004), Modeling the Effects of Wind Redistribution on the Snow Mass Budget of Polar Sea Ice,/. Phys. Oceanogr., 34(1), 258-271, doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<0258:MTEOWR>2.0.CO;2.
Dewitt H. H. (1970), The Character of the mid water fish fauna of the Ross Sea Antarctca, in Antarctic ecology, vol. 1, edited by M. W. Holdgat, pp. 305-314, Academic Press, London.
Dickson, R. R., T.J. Osborn, J. W. Hurrell, J. Meincke, J. Blindheim, B. Adlandsvik, T. Vinje, G, Alekseev and W. Maslowski (2000), The Arctic Ocean response to the North Atlantic Oscillation, J.Clim., 13(15), 2671-96.
Dinniman, M. S., J. M. Klinck and W. O. Smith (2003), Cross-shelf exchange in a model of the Ross Sea circulation and biogeochemistry, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 50(22-26), 3103-3120, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2003.07.011.
Edwards, R. and P. Sedwick (2001), Iron in East Antarctic snow: Implications for atmospheric iron deposition and algal production in Antarctic waters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3907-3910.
Emanuel, K. (2005), Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years, Nature, 436(7051), 686-8.
Emanuel, K. A. (1987), The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate, Nature, 326(6112), 483-5.
![Page 137: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Eppley, R. W. (1972), Temperature and Phytoplankton Growth in the Sea, Fish. Bull., 70(A), 1063-1085.
Erickson, A. W., R. J. Hofman, R. J. Oehlensc, J. Otis and D. Kuehn (1971), Seal Population Studies in the Ross Sea, Antarct. J. U. S., 6, 98-99.
Fichefet, T. and H. Goosse (1999), A numerical investigation of the spring Ross Sea polynya, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,1015-1018.
Flament, P., L. Armi and L. Washburn (1985), The evolving structure of an upwelling filament,/. Geophys. Res., 90, 11765-11778.
Flato, G. M., G. J. Boer, W. G. Lee, N. A. McFarlane, D. Ramsden, M. C. Reader and A. J. Weaver (2000), The Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis Global Coupled Model and its Climate, Clim. Dyn., 16(6), 451-467.
Flato, G. M. and W. D. Hibler (1992), Modeling pack ice as a cavitating fluid,/. Phjs. Oceanogr., 22, 626-651.
Frauenfeld, O. W. and R. E. Davis (2003), Northern Hemisphere circumpolar vortex trends and climate change implications, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, ACL7-1.
Gallee, H. (1997), Air-sea interactions over Terra Nova Bay during-winter: simulation with a coupled atmosphere-polynya model,/. Geophys. Res., 102,13835-13849.
Gordon, A. L. and J. C. Comiso (1988), Polynyas in the Southern Ocean, Sri. Am., 258, 10-11.
Gordon, H. R , D. K. Clark, J. W. Brown, O. B. Brown, R. H. Evans and W. W. Broenkow (1983), Phytoplankton pigment concentrations in the Middle Adantic Bight: comparison of ship determinations and CZCS estimates, Appl. Opt., 22, 20-36.
Gordon, L. I., L. A. Codispoti, J. C.Jennings, F.J. Millero, J. M. Morrison and C. Sweeney (2000), Seasonal evolution of hydrographic properties in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, 1996-1997, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 47(15-16), 3095-3117, doi:10.1016/S0967-0645(00)00060-6.
Greischar L. L., J. D. Robertson, C. R. Bendey and J. W. Clough (1981), Sea-bottom topography and crustal structure below the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica, in Antarctic Geology and Geophysics, edited by C. Craddock, pp. 1083-1090, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI.
Grigg, S. B. and N. J. Holbrook (2001), The impact of polynyas on the stability of the thermohaline circulation as simulated in a coupled ocean-atmosphere-sea ice box model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 767-770.
![Page 138: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Groisman, P. Y., R. W. Knight, D. R. Easterling, T. R. Karl, G. C. Hegerl and V. A. N. Razuvaev (2005), Trends in intense precipitation in the climate record, j.Clim., 18(9), 1326-50.
Haine, T. W. N. and K. J. Richards (1995), The influence of the seasonal mixed layer on oceanic uptake of CFCs,/. Geophys. Res., 100,10727-10744.
Heath, R. A. (1981), Oceanic fronts around southern New Zealand, Deep Sea Res., Part A, 28, 547-560.
Hellmer, H. H. (2004), Impact of Antarctic ice shelf basal melting on sea ice and deep ocean properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 5/(10), GL019506, doi:doi:10.1029/2004GL019506.
Hibler, W. D. (1979), A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model,/. Phys. Oceanogr., 9, 815-846.
Hofmann E. E. and J. M. Klinck (1998), Hydrography and Circulation of the Antarctic Continental Shelf: 150 E Eastward to the Greenwich Meridian, in The Global Coastal Ocean, Regional Studies and Synthesis, The Sea: Ideas and Observations in the Study of the Seas, vol. 11, edited by A. R. Robinson and K. H. Brink, pp. 997-1042, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Holland, D. M. (1998), On the parameterization of basal heat flux for sea-ice modeling, Geophysica, 34,1-21.
Holland, D. M. (2001), Explaining the Weddell Polynya-a large ocean eddy shed at Maud Rise, Science, 292(5522), 1697-1700, doi:l0.1126/science. 1059322.
Holland, D. M., S. S. Jacobs and A. Jenkins (2003), Modelling the ocean circulation beneath the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarct. Sci., /5(1), 13-23, doi:10.1017/S0954102003001019.
Holland, D. M. and A. Jenkins (1999), Modeling thermodynamic ice-ocean interactions at the base of an ice shelf, / . Phys. Oceanogr., 29,1787-1800.
Holland, D. M. and A. Jenkins (2001), Adaptation of an isopycnic coordinate ocean model for the study of circulation beneath ice shelves, Mon. Weather Rev., 129, 1905-1927.
Holland, D. M., L. A. Mysak, D. K. Manak and J. M. Oberhuber (1993), Sensitivity study of a dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model,/. Geophys. Res., 98, 2561-2586.
Hunke, E. C. and S. F. Ackley (2001), A numerical investigation of the 1997-1998 Ronne polynya,/. Geophys. Res., 106,22373-22382.
IPCC, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Science of"Climate Change. Contribution of the Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
![Page 139: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell, C.A. Johnson (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 881 pp.
IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of the Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp.
Jacobs, S. S., A. F. Amos and P. M. Bruchhausen (1970), Ross Sea oceanogrphy and Antarctic Bottom Water formation, Deep-Sea Res., 17, 935-962.
Jacobs, S. S. and J. C. Comiso (1989), Sea Ice and oceanic processes on the Ross Sea continental shelf,/. Geophys. Res., 94, 18195-18211.
Jacobs S. S., R. Fairbanks and Y. Horibe (1985), Origin and evolution of water masses near the Antarctic continental margin: Evidence from H2
1 80/H21 60 ratios in
seawater, in Oceanology of the Antarctic Continental Shelf, Antarc. Res. Sen, vol. 43, edited by S. Jacobs, pp. 59-85, AGU, Washington, D. C.
Jacobs S. S. and C. F. Giulivi (1999), Thermohaline Data and Ocean Circulation on the Ross Sea Continental Shelf, in Oceanography of the Ross Sea Antarctica, edited by G. Spezie and G. M. R. Manzella, pp. 3-16,.
Jacobs, S. S., A. L. Gordon and J. L. Ardai Jr. (1979), Circulation and Melting Beneath the Ross Ice Shelf, Science, 203, 439-443.
Jacobs, S. S., H. H. Hellmer, C. S. M. Doake, A. Jenkins and R. M. FroHch (1992), Melting of Ice Shelves and the Mass Balance of Antarctica,/. Glaciol, 38(\2>Q), 375-387.
Jacobs, S. S., H. H. Hellmer and A. Jenkins (1996), Antarctic ice sheet melting in the Southeast Pacific, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(9), 957-960.
Jeffries, M. O. and U. Adolphs (1997), Early winter ice and snow thickness distribution, ice structure and development of the western Ross Sea pack ice between the ice edge and the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarct. Sci., 9,188-200.
Jenkins, A. and D. Holland (2007), Melting of floating ice and sea level rise, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16609, doi:10.1029/2007GL030784.
Kalnay, E., M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, Y. Zhu, M. Chelliah, W. Ebisuzaki, W. Higgins, J. Janowiak, K. C. Mo, C. Ropelewski, J. Wang, A. Leetmaa, R. Reynolds, R. Jenne and D.Joseph (1996), The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc, 77,437-471.
![Page 140: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Keys, H.J. R., S. S.Jacobs and L. W. Brigham (1998), Continued northward expansion of the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica, Annals of Glaciology, Vol27, 1998, 27, 93-98.
Killops S. K. and V. Killops (2005), Introduction to Organic Geochemistry, 393 pp., Blackwell Publishing, Maiden, MA.
Koentopp, M., O. Eisen, C. Kottmeier, L. Padman and P. Lemke (2005), Influence of tides on sea ice in the Weddell Sea: Investigations with a high-resolution dynamic-thermodynamic sea ice model,/. Geophys. Res., 110, C02014, doi: 10.1029/2004JC002405.
Lamy, F., J. Kaiser, H. W. Arz, D. Hebbeln, U. Ninnemann, O. Timm, A. Timmermann and J. R. Toggweiler (2007), Modulation of the bipolar seesaw in the Southeast Pacific during Termination 1, Earth Planet.Sci.Lett., 259(3-4), 400-13.
Lauriano, G., M. Vacchi, D. Ainley and G. Ballard (2007), Observations of top predators foraging on fish in the pack ice of the southern Ross Sea, Antarct.Sci., 19(4), 439-440.
Le Quere, C , C. Rodenbeck, E. T. Buitenhuis, T. J. Conway, R. Langenfelds, A. Gomez, C. Labuschagne, M. Ramonet, T. Nakazawa, N. Metzl, N. Gillett and M. Heimann (2007), Saturation of the Southern Ocean C02 sink due to recent climate change, Science (Washington D C), 316(5832), 1735-1738.
Legates, D. R. and C. J. Willmott (1990), Mean Seasonal and Spatial Variability in Gauge-Corrected, Global Precipitation, Int. J. Clim., 10,111-127.
Lindsay, R. W. and J. Zhang (2005), The thinning of Arctic sea ice, 1988-2003: have we passed a tipping point? J.Clim., 18(22), 4879-94.
Liss, P. S. and P. G. Slater (1974), Flux of gases across the air-sea interface, Nature, 247(5438), 181-4.
Lo Monaco, C, C. Goyet, N. Metzl, A. Poisson and F. Touratier (2005), Distribution and inventory of anthropogenic C02 in the Southern Ocean: Comparison of three data-based methods, Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 110, C09S02.
Locarnini R. A. (1994), Water Masses and Circulation in the Ross Gyre and Environs, Ph.D. thesis, 87pp., Texas A7M University, Texas, December.
Lovenduski, N. S. and N. Gruber (2005), Impact of the Southern Annular Mode on Southern Ocean circulation and biology, Geophys.Res.Lett., 32(11), 4.
Lucarini, V. and G. L. Russell (2002), Comparison of mean climate trends in the Northern Hemisphere between National Centers for Environmental Prediction and two atmosphere-ocean model forced runs, journal of Geophysical Research, 107, ACL7-1.
Lucas, L. V. and J. E. Cloern (2002), Effects of tidal shallowing and deepening on phytoplankton production dynamics: A modeling study, Estuaries, 25, 497-507.
![Page 141: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
MacAyeal, D. R. (1984), Numerical simulations of the Ross Sea tides,/. Geophys. Res., 89, 607-615.
Maqueda, M. A. M., A. J. Willmott and N. R. T. Biggs (2004), Polynya dynamics: A review of observations and modeling, Rev. Geophys., 42, RG1004, doi:10.1029/2002RG000116.
Marshall, G. J. (2003), Trends in the southern annular mode from observations and teanalyses,/.GEw., 16(24), 4134-43.
Marshall, G.J. (2007), Half-century seasonal relationships between the Southern Annular Mode and Antarctic temperatures, Int.J.Climatol, 27(3), 373-83.
Maslowski, W., D. C. Marble, W. Walczowski and A. J. Semtner (2001), On large-scale shifts in the Arctic Ocean and sea-ice conditions during 1979-98, Annals of'Glaciology, 33, 545-50.
Massom, R. A., P. T. Harris, K. J. Michael and M. J. Potter (1998), The distribution and formative processes of latent-heat polynyas in East Antarctica, Ann. GlacioL, 27, 420-426.
Massom, R. A., K. L. Hill, V. I. Lytle, A. P. Worby, M. Paget and I. Allison (2001), Effects of regional fast-ice and iceberg distributions on the behaviour of the Mertz Glacier polynya, East Antarctica, Ann. GlacioL, 33, 391-398.
McClain, C. R., K. R. Arrigo, K. S. Tai and D. Turk (1996), Observations and simulations of physical and biological processes at ocean weather station P, 1951-1980,/. Geophys. Res., 101(02), 3697-713.
McClatchie, S., R. B. Millar, F. Webster, P.J. Lester, R. Hurst and N. Bagley (1997), Demersal fish community diversity off New Zealand: Is it related to depth, latitude and regional surface phytoplankton? Deep Sea Res., Part I, 44, 647-667.
McPhee, M. G. (1980), An analysis of pack ice drift in summer, Sea Ice Processes and Models. Proceedings of the Arctic Ice Dynamics Joint Experiment International Commission on Snow and Ice Symposium, Univ. Washington Press, Seattle, Wash., 6-9 September.
McPhee, M. G. (1983), Turbulent heat and momentum transfer in the oceanic boundary layer under melting pack ice, / . Geophys. Res., 88, 2827-2835.
Mellor, G. L. and T. Yamada (1982), Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 851-875.
Michel, R. L., T. W. Linick and P. M. Williams (1979), Tritium and Carbon-14 Distributions in Seawater from Under the Ross Ice Shelf Project Ice Hole, Science, 203, AAS-AA6.
![Page 142: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
Monod J. (1942), Recherces sur la croissance des cultures bacteriennes, Herman et Cie, Paris.
Moore, M. I. and R. C. Murdoch (1993), Physical and biological observations of coastal squirts under nonupwelling conditions,/. Geophys. Res., 98, 20043-20061.
Morel, A. (1988), Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (case I waters),/. Geophys. Res., 93(C9), 10749-68.
Ohshima, K. I. and S. Nihashi (2005), A simplified ice-ocean coupled model for the Antarctic ice melt season,/. Phys. Oceanogr., 35(2), 188-201, doi:10.1175/JPO-2675.1.
Olbers, D.J., Gouretzki, V., Seiss, G. & Schroter, J. 1992. The hydrographic atlas of the Southern Ocean. Bremerhaven: Alfred Wegener Institute, http://www.awi-bremerhaven.de/Atlas/SO
Olson, R. J., H. M. Sosik, A. M. Chekalyuk and A. Shalapyonok (2000), Effects of iron enrichment on phytoplankton in the Southern Ocean during late summer: active fluorescence and flow cytometric analyses, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 47, 3181-3200.
Overland, J. E. and K. L. Davidson (1992), Geostrophic drag coefficient over sea ice, Dynam. Met. and Oceanography, 44A, 54-66.
Overland, J. E., H. O. Mofjeld and C. H. Pease (1984), Wind-Driven Ice Drift in a Shallow Sea,/. Geophys. Res., 89, 6525-6531.
Padman, L., S. Erofeeva and I. Joughin (2003), Tides of the Ross Sea and Ross Ice Shelf cavity, Antarct. Set., 15(1), 1-10, doi: 10.1017/S0954102002.
Pease, C. H. (1987), The size of wind-driven coastal polynyas,/. Geophys. Res., 92, 7049-7059.
Picco P., L. Amici, R. Meloni, L. Langone and M. Ravaioli (1999), Temporal variability of currents in the Ross Sea (Antarctica), in Oceanography of the Ross sea Antarctica, edited by G. Spezie and G. M. R. Manzella, pp. 103-117, Springer, New York.
Polito, M., S. D. Emslie and W. Walker (2002), A 1000-year record of Adelie penguin diets in the southern Ross Sea, Antarct. Sci, 14(A), 327-332, doi:10.1017/S0954102002000184.
Polyakov, I. and S. Martin (2000), Interaction of the Okhotsk Sea diurnal tides with the KashevarovBankpolynya,/. Geophys. Res., 105, 3281-3294.
Prezelin, B. B., E. E. Hofmann, C. Mengelt and J. M. Klinck (2000), The linkage between Upper Circumpolar Deep Water (UCDW) and phytoplankton assemblages on the west Antarctic Peninsula continental shelf,/. Mar. Res., 58, 165-202.
129
![Page 143: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
Reddy, T. E. and K. R. Arrigo (2006), Constraints on the extent of the Ross Sea phytoplankton bloom,/. Geophys. Res., 111, C07005, doi:10.1029/2005JC003339.
Reddy, T. E. and K. R. Arrigo (in prep), Ross Sea Primary Production and Sea Ice under Future Climatic Change Scenarios, / . Geophys. Res.
Reddy, T. E., K. R. Arrigo and D. M. Holland (2007), The Role of Thermal and Mechanical Processes in the Formation of the Ross Sea Summer Polynya,/. Geophys. Res., doi:10.1029/2006JC003874.
Reddy, T. E., D. M. Holland and K. R. Arrigo (submitted), Ross Ice Shelf Cavity Circulation, Residence Time, and Melting: Results from a Model of Oceanic Chlorofluorocarbons, Umnol. Oceanogr.
Richardson, A. J. and D. S. Schoeman (2004), Climate impact on plankton ecosystems in the Northeast Atlantic, Science, 305(5690), 1609-12.
Roberts, A., I. Allison and V. I. Lytle (2001), Sensible- and latent-heat-flux estimates over the Mertz Glacier polynya, East Antarctica, from in-flight measurements, Ann. Glaciol., 33, 377-384.
Robertson R. A., L. Padman and G. D. Egbert (1998), Tides in the Weddell Sea, in Ocean, Ice, and Atmosphere: Interactions at the Antarctic Continental, Antarct. Res. Sen, vol. 75, edited by S. S.Jacobs and R. F. Weiss, pp. 341-369, AGU, Washington, D.C.
Roman, M., X. Zhang, C. McGilliard and W. Boicourt (2005), Seasonal and annual variability in the spatial patterns of plankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, Umnol. Oceanogr., 50, 480-492.
Russell, J. L., K. W. Dixon, A. Gnanadesikan, R. J. Stouffer and J. R. Toggweiler (2006), The Southern Hemisphere westerlies in a warming world: propping open the door to the deep oce&n,J.Clim., 19(24), 6382-90.
Sarmiento, J. L., T. M. C. Hughes, R. J. Stouffer and S. Manabe (1998), Simulated response of the ocean carbon cycle to anthropogenic climate warming, Nature, 393(6682), 245-9.
Sarmiento, J. L. and C. LeQuere (1996), Oceanic carbon dioxide uptake in a model of century-scale global warming, Science, 274(5291), 1346-50.
SCAR. 1993. Antarctic Digital Database. Cambridge: Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, http://www.nercbas.ac.uk/public/magic/add.html
Semtner, A. J. and R. M. Chervin (1992), Ocean general circulation from a global eddy-resolving model,/. Geophys. Res., 97, 5493-5550.
Shillington, F. A., W. T. Peterson, L. Hutchings, T. A. Probyn, H. N. Waldron and J. J. Agenbag (1990), A cool upwelling filament off Namibia, southwest Africa:
130
![Page 144: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
preliminary measurements of physical and biological features, Deep Sea Res., Part A, 37,1753-1772.
Shimada, K., T. Kamoshida, M. Itoh, S. Nishino, E. Carmack, F. McLaughlin, S. Zimmermann and A. Proshutinsky (2006), Pacific Ocean inflow: Influence on catastrophic reduction of sea ice cover in the Arctic Ocean, Geophys.Res.Lett., 33(8), L08605.
Shindell, D. T., R. L. Miller, G. A. Schmidt and L. Pandolfo (1999), Simulation of recent northern winter climate trends by greenhouse-gas forcing, Nature, 399(6735), 452-455.
Shindell, D. T. and G. A. Schmidt (2004), Southern Hemisphere climate response to ozone changes and greenhouse gas increases, Geophys.Res.Lett., i/(18), LI8209-4.
Simmonds, I. and K. Keay (2000), Variability of Southern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone behavior, 1958-97, J.Clim., 13(3), 550-61.
Smethie, W. M. and S. S. Jacobs (2005), Circulation and melting under the Ross Ice Shelf: estimates from evolving CFC, salinity and temperature fields in the Ross Sea, Deep Sea Res. I, 52(6), 959-978, doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2004.11.016.
Smith, S. D., R. D. Muench and C. H. Pease (1990), Polynyas and leads: an overview of physical processes and environment,/. Geophys. Res., 95, 9461-9479.
Smith, W. O. and L. I. Gordon (1997), Hyperproductivity of the Ross Sea (Antarctica) polynya during austral spring, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 233-236.
Steele, M. and T. Boyd (1998), Retreat of the cold halocline layer in the Arctic Ocean, Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 10419-35.
Stewart R. H. (2004), Introduction to Physical Oceanography, 344 pp., Texas A&M University, College Station.
Stouffer, R. J., S. Manabe, K. Bryan and K. Aagaard (1989), Interhemispheric asymmetry in climate response to a gradual increase of atmospheric C0 2 , Nature, 342(6250), 660-662.
Sweeney, C , W. O. Smith, B. Hales, R. R. Bidigare, C. A. Carlson, L. A. Codispoti, L. I. Gordon, D. A. Hansell, F. J. Millero, M. O. Park and T. Takahashi (2000), Nutrient and carbon removal ratios and fluxes in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, Deep Sea Res., Part 11,47,3395-3421.
Trumbore, S. E., S. S.Jacobs and W. M. Smethie Jr (1991), Chlorofluorocarbon evidence for rapid ventilation of the Ross Sea, Deep-Sea Research, Part A (Oceanographic Research Papers), 38(1 A), 845-70.
![Page 145: OCEANOGRAPHY OF THE ROSS SEA: OCEAN ...ocean.stanford.edu/people/dissertations/reddy...LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Constraints on the Extent of the Ross](https://reader030.vdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022040612/5f04e1f97e708231d4102f11/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
Van Woert, M. L. (1999), Wintertime dynamics of the Terra Nova Bay polynya,/. Geophys. Res., 104, 7753-7769.
Van Woert M. L., E. S. Jahnson, L. Langone, D. L. Worthen, A. Monaghan, D. H. Bromwich, R. Meloni and R. B. Dunbar (2003), The Ross Sea Circulation During the 1990s, in Biogeochemistry of the Ross Sea, Antarct. Res. Ser., vol. 78, edited by G. R. DiTullio and R. B. Dunbar, pp. 5-34, AGU, Washington, D.C.
Van Woert, M. L., W. N. Meier, C. Z. Zou, A. Archer, A. Pellegrini, P. Grigioni and C. Bertola (2001), Satellite observations of upper-ocean currents in Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica, Ann. Glaciol, 33, 407-412.
Walker, S. J., R. F. Weiss and P. K. Salameh (2000), Reconstructed histories of the annual mean atmospheric mole fractions for the halocarbons CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, and carbon tetrachloride, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(C6), 14285-96.
Wanninkhof, R. (1992), Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean, Journal of'Geophysical'Research, 97(C5), 7373-7382.
Warner, M.J. and R. F. Weiss (1985), Solubilities of chlorofluorocarbons 11 and 12 in water and seawater, Deep Sea Res., 32(12A), 1485-1497.
Winton, M. (2006), Does the Arctic sea ice have a tipping point? Geophjs.Res.Lett., 33(23), 1-5.
Worthen D. L. and K. R. Arrigo (2003), A coupled ocean-ecosystem model of the Ross Sea: 1. Interannual variability of primary production and phytoplankton community structure, in Biogeochemistry of the Ross Sea, Antarct. Res. Ser., vol. 78, edited by G. R. DiTullio and R. B. Dunbar, pp. 93-105, AGU, Washington, D.C.
Wu, X. G., W. F. Budd and I. Allison (2003), Modelling the impacts of persistent Antarctic polynyas with an atmosphere-sea-ice general circulation model, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 30(8-9), 1357-1372, doi:10.1016/S0967-0645(03)00072-9.
Wu, X. G., I. Simmonds and W. F. Budd (1997), Modeling of Antarctic sea ice in a general circulation model,/. Clim., 10, 593-609.
Zheng, M., W.J. De Bruyn and E. S. Saltzman (1998), Measurements of the diffusion coefficients of CFC-11 and CFC-12 in pure water and seawater,/. Geophys. Res., 103(d), 1375-1379.
Zwally H. J., J. C. Comiso and A. L. Gordon (1985), Antarctic offshore leads and polynyas and oceanographic effects, in Oceanology of Antarctic Continental Shelf Antarct. Res. Ser., vol. 43, edited by S. S.Jacobs, pp. 203-226, AGU, Washington, D.C.
132