ocean wave energy regimes of the circum-polar coastal zone david e. atkinson international arctic...
TRANSCRIPT
Ocean wave energy regimes of the circum-polar coastal zoneOcean wave energy regimes of the circum-polar coastal zone
David E. Atkinson
International Arctic Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences DepartmentUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks
David E. Atkinson
International Arctic Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences DepartmentUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
ObjectiveObjective
Provide wave energy climatologies for the Arctic Coastal Dynamics Project Provide wave energy climatologies for the Arctic Coastal Dynamics Project
Photos by Julie Baltar , story in the Nome NuggetShishmaref, AK
Shishmaref, AK bluff retreatShishmaref, AK bluff retreat
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska Fairbanks
Impacts – Alaska - communitiesImpacts – Alaska - communities
AGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
Photos taken 2 hours apartPhotos taken 2 hours apart
Figure given to me by Tohru Saito, IARCFigure given to me by Tohru Saito, IARCImpacts – Alaska - communitiesImpacts – Alaska - communities
MotivationMotivation
> Wave energy principle forcing agent
> Much of the circum-polar coastal zone susceptible to erosion
> Problem is not easy
- shallow zones
- sea ice
* ice on/off dates controls wave access
* position of ice offshore controls fetch
(presence of floating ice also modifies wave energy)
> Coastal process models require wave energy input (I.e., and not wind)
> Engineering issues
> Wave energy principle forcing agent
> Much of the circum-polar coastal zone susceptible to erosion
> Problem is not easy
- shallow zones
- sea ice
* ice on/off dates controls wave access
* position of ice offshore controls fetch
(presence of floating ice also modifies wave energy)
> Coastal process models require wave energy input (I.e., and not wind)
> Engineering issues
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
Desire: develop a system that will translate winds into wave energy
> ERA is available, but
- custom development will allow tailoring
(e.g. force with winds from HIRHAM, upcoming arctic
reanalysis, even AOGCM predicted fields.)
> Generate climatological wave fields
- monthly totals
- annual totals
- period means and trends (1979-2003)
Provide to coastal dymanics researchers, but
can also assess contribution of ice
Desire: develop a system that will translate winds into wave energy
> ERA is available, but
- custom development will allow tailoring
(e.g. force with winds from HIRHAM, upcoming arctic
reanalysis, even AOGCM predicted fields.)
> Generate climatological wave fields
- monthly totals
- annual totals
- period means and trends (1979-2003)
Provide to coastal dymanics researchers, but
can also assess contribution of ice
Scope and ApproachScope and Approach
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
Wave energy calculation
- 1st order linear (Airy) approximation
> Coastal Engineering Manual and Technical
Reference for the Automated Coastal Engineering System
(USArmy Corps of Engineers)
> suitable for most applications
Full complexity of the 3-D fluid structure can not currently be described
in its entirety
Wave energy calculation
- 1st order linear (Airy) approximation
> Coastal Engineering Manual and Technical
Reference for the Automated Coastal Engineering System
(USArmy Corps of Engineers)
> suitable for most applications
Full complexity of the 3-D fluid structure can not currently be described
in its entirety
Scope and ApproachScope and Approach
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
Wind forcing:
- NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, 925 mb to overcome speed problems
- direction limited to 180° (I.e. water side)
Direct forcing approach, not distribution based
Wind forcing:
- NCEP/NCAR reanalysis, 925 mb to overcome speed problems
- direction limited to 180° (I.e. water side)
Direct forcing approach, not distribution based
Scope and ApproachScope and Approach
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
Scope and ApproachScope and Approach
Depth
- simply specified at 10m
- represents generic shelf zone
Sea ice
- NSIDC extent plots used
- coastal region divided into 12 sectors by longitude
- based on ice plots, sectors assigned a binary ice/no ice class
- turned energy on/off for that month
Depth
- simply specified at 10m
- represents generic shelf zone
Sea ice
- NSIDC extent plots used
- coastal region divided into 12 sectors by longitude
- based on ice plots, sectors assigned a binary ice/no ice class
- turned energy on/off for that month
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
ACD zones, weather station locations
Results from Arctic Coastal Dynamics projectResults from Arctic Coastal Dynamics project
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
1
23
5678
9
10
11
12
4
No depth variation
Winds do not catch all events (spatial resolution)
Ice sector approximation
Ice content (binary approach) coarse
Spatial resoution coarse
Orientation of wind energy wrt coastline crude (180 degree thing)
No depth variation
Winds do not catch all events (spatial resolution)
Ice sector approximation
Ice content (binary approach) coarse
Spatial resoution coarse
Orientation of wind energy wrt coastline crude (180 degree thing)
LimitationsLimitations
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
1979 total1979 total
ICE No ICE
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
1998 total1998 total
ICE No ICE
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
1979 – 2003 mean1979 – 2003 mean
ICE No ICE
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
1979 – 2003 trends1979 – 2003 trends
ICE No ICE
For example,For example,
> Increase wind forcing resolution
> Introduce local coastal orientation
> Variable depth
> Introduce variable ice concentrations, drop sector approach
> Comparisons with existing observed/modeled information
(e.g. Ogorodov for Pechora Sea)
> Increase wind forcing resolution
> Introduce local coastal orientation
> Variable depth
> Introduce variable ice concentrations, drop sector approach
> Comparisons with existing observed/modeled information
(e.g. Ogorodov for Pechora Sea)
Next steps/improvementsNext steps/improvements
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
David E. AtkinsonIARC/Atm. Sci., University of Alaska FairbanksAGU San Fransisco: December 13, 2004
> Influence of sea ice apparent even for this coarse approach
> Wave energy trends, not just seasonal totals, influenced by sea ice conditions
> Influence of sea ice apparent even for this coarse approach
> Wave energy trends, not just seasonal totals, influenced by sea ice conditions
ConclusionsConclusions