ntrel phev
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
1/20
Plug-in HEV Vehicle DesignOptions and Expectations
ZEV Technology SymposiumCalifornia Air Resources Board
Sacramento, CA
September 27, 2006
Tony Markel
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
With support from
FreedomCAR and Vehicle Technologies Program
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
U.S. Department of Energy
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
2/20
2
Disclaimer and Government License
This work has been authored by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) under Contract No. DE-AC36-99GO10337 with the U.S. Department of Energy (the DOE). The United States Government (theGovernment) retains and the publisher, by accepting the work for publication, acknowledges thatthe Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish orreproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for Government purposes.
Neither MRI, the DOE, the Government, nor any other agency thereof, nor any of their employees,makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the accuracy,completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, orrepresents that its use would not infringe any privately owned rights. Reference herein to anyspecific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, orotherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the
Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of the authors and/or presentersexpressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of MRI, the DOE, the Government, orany agency thereof.
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
3/20
3
Key Messages
There are many ways to design a PHEV
the best design depends on your objective
PHEVs provide potential for petroleumdisplacement through fuel flexibility
what are the cost and emissions tradeoffs
PHEV design space has many dimensions
simulation being used for detailed exploration
Simulations using real-world travel data providesearly glimpse into in-use operation
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
4/20
4
PHEV Stakeholder Objectives
ConsumersConsumersAffordable
Fun to driveFunctional
California Gov.California Gov.
Reduced air pollution
US Gov./DOEUS Gov./DOE
Reduced petroleum use
Auto ManufacturerAuto ManufacturerSell cars
Electric UtilityElectric UtilitySell electricity
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
5/20
5
A Plug-In Hybrid-Electric Vehicle (PHEV)
ELECTRIC ACCESSORIES
ADVANCED ENGINE
ENGINE IDLE-OFF
ENGINE DOWNSIZING
REGENERATIVE BRAKING
BATTERY RECHARGE
ELECTRICITY
PETROLEUM
AND/OR
Fuel Flexibility
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
6/20
6
Some PHEV Definitions
Charge-Depleting (CD) Mode: An operating mode in which the energy storage SOCmay fluctuate but on-average decreases while driving
Charge-Sustaining (CS) Mode: An operating mode in which the energy storage SOCmay fluctuate but on-average is maintained at a certain level while driving
All-Electric Range (AER): After a full recharge, the total miles driven electrically(engine-off) before the engine turns on for the first time.
Electric Vehicle Miles (EVM): After a full recharge, the cumulative miles drivenelectrically (engine-off) before the vehicle reaches charge-sustaining mode.
Charge-Depleting Range (CDR): After a full recharge, the total miles driven before thevehicle reaches charge-sustaining mode.
Blended Strategy: A charge-depleting operating strategy in which the engine is used tosupplement battery/motor power.
PHEV20: A PHEV with useable energy storage equivalent to 20 miles of driving energyon a reference driving cycle. A PHEV20 can displace petroleum energy equivalent to20 miles of driving on the reference cycle with off-board electricity.
NOTE: PHEV20 does not imply that the vehicle will achieve 20 miles of AER, EVM orCDR on the reference cycle nor any other driving cycle. Operating characteristics alsodepend on the power ratings of components, the powertrain control strategy and the
nature of the driving cycle
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
7/20
7
Battery Definition as Key Input to Simulation
kWh/mi(from simulation)
SOC window
PHEV range
P/E ratio
Performanceconstraints
kWh usable
kWh total
kWmotor
kWengine
DOH
Benefit ofplugging-in
Benefit ofhybridization
Total MPG Benefit
mass compounding
Input parameters that define the battery in BLUE
DOH = degree of hybridization
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
8/20
8
Batteries in Current PHEVs
Johnson Controls/SAFT
Varta
Valence Technology
Kokam
A123 Systems
Electro Energy Inc.
NiMH
Co/Ni
based
Li-Ion
Iro
nphosphate
b
asedLi-Ion
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
9/20
9
Battery SOC Design Window
Battery cycle life is a strong
function of SOC swing:
In setting requirements, we must have realistic expectations for batterySOC design window because of the impacts on total battery size and life.
SOC design window is a keyfactor in battery sizing: windowSOC
kWhkWh useabletotal
=
Daily Mileage Probability Distribution
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Daily mileage (
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
10/20
10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Daily Mileage / PHEVx
Design SOC windowbased on PHEVx
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Daily Mileage / PHEVx
Average daily SOCswing based on dailymileage distribution
Battery SOC Design Window
Daily mileage probability distribution
Battery SOC design curve for 15 year cycle life
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
11/20
11
Operating Strategy OptionsAll-Electric or Blended
Engine turns on when powerexceeds battery power capability
Engine only provides load thatexceeds battery power capability
Engine turns on when batteryreaches low state of charge
Requires high power battery and
motor
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (mi)
Power(kW)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SOC(%)
engine
motor
SOC
All-Electric
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance (mi)
Power(kW)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SOC(%)
enginemotor
SOC
Blended
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
12/20
12
Real Driving Survey Data
Provides valuable insight into travel behavior GPS augmented surveys supply details needed
for vehicle simulation
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
13/20
13
St. Louis data set includes 227 vehicles from 147 households
Complete second by second driving profile for one day 8650 miles of travel St. Louis data set is a small sample of real data NPTS data is generated from mileage estimates
St. Louis Travel Data AnalysisDaily Driving Distance Similar to 1995 NPTS Data
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
00-
55-
10
10-1
5
15-2
0
20-2
5
25-3
0
30-3
5
35-4
0
40-4
5
45-5
0
50-5
5
55-6
0
60-6
5
65-7
0
70-7
5
75-8
0
80-8
5
85-9
0
90-9
5
95-1
00
Daily Distance (mi)
Frequency(%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CummulativeFrequency(%)
1995 NPTS Data
~33 mi0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2 4 6 8101214161820222426283032343638404244464850525456586062646668707274767880828486889092949698100
Daily Travel Distance (miles)
Frequency(%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CumulativeFrequenc
y(%)
Frequency (%)Cumulative Freq. (%)
~29 mi
St. Louis HHTS Data
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
14/20
14
Consumption DistributionMany PHEVs Better than Rated Values
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
Fuel Consumption (L/100km)
Percentag
eofFleet(%)
Conventional
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
Fuel Consumption (L/100km)
Percentag
eofFleet(%)
Hybrid
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40PHEV20
Fuel Consumption (L/100km)
PercentageofFleet(%)
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
30
40
Fuel Consumption (L/100km)
PercentageofFleet(%)
PHEV40
Real-world
City/HighwayComposite
39.2 mpg (6.0 L/100km)
US0633.2 mpg (7.1 L/100km)
Real-world
City/HighwayComposite
67.4 mpg (3.49 L/100km)
City/HighwayComposite
54 mpg (4.35 L/100km)
US0651.5 mpg (4.57 L/100km)
US0639.6 mpg (5.94 L/100km)
Real-worldReal-world
City/HighwayComposite
26 mpg (9.05 L/100km)
US06
24.6 mpg (9.55 L/100km)
Fleet results are based on simulations of 227 vehicle
driving profiles from St. Louis metropolitan area.
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
15/20
15
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Time of Day (hr)
PercentageofVehicle
FleetInUse(%
)
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Cumu
lativeFuelConsumed(gallons)
Conventional
Hybrid
PHEV20PHEV40
PHEVs Reduce Fuel Consumption By >50%On Real-World Driving Cycles
8647 total miles driven 100% replacement of
sample fleet
227 vehicles from St. Louis each modeled as a conventional, hybr227 vehicles from St. Louis each modeled as a conventional, hybrid and PHEVid and PHEV
26 mpg
58 mpg &
140 Wh/mi
PHEVs:
>40% reduction in energycosts
>$500 annual savings
37 mpg
76 mpg &211 Wh/mi
Assumes $2.41/gal and 9/kWh
$1.21
$1.58
$2.48
$3.45
Gas.
Average Daily Costs
$0.72
$0.48
---
---
Elec.
5.1
5.4
6.5
9.1
/mi
PHEV40
PHEV20
HEV
CV
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
16/20
16
Simulated In-Use All-Electric Range Distribution
Vehicles were designed to operate all electricallyon UDDS Power demands of real profiles exceed UDDS peak
power within the first few miles
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 250
5
10
15
20
25
30
All Electric Range (mi)
PercentageofFlee
t(%)
PHEV20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
All Electric Range (mi)
PercentageofFlee
t(%)
PHEV40
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
17/20
17
Fuel Economy and All-Electric Range Comparison
Significant difference between rated (EPA drivecycles) and real-world median values for PHEVs
Consumers likely to observe fuel economy higherthan rated value in daily driving
Vehicles designed with all-electric range likely tooperate in a blended mode to meet driver demands
** Fuel economy values do not include electrical energy consumption
Rated Median Rated Median
Conventional 26 24.4 n/a n/aHEV 39.2 35.8 n/a n/aPHEV20 54 70.2 22.3 5.6PHEV40 67.4 133.6 35.8 3.8
Fuel Economy (mpg) ** All Electric Range (mi)
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
18/20
18
PHEV20 Savings Relative to Conventional and HEV
Savings relative toconventional are
almost entirelydistance dependent
Savings relative to
HEV are distancedependent up toPHEV distance then
constant
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
19/20
19
Insights:
The PHEV20s that saved the most fuel relative to an HEV travel ~25 miles with speedsunder 60 mph and light accelerations
The PHEV20s that saved the least fuel relative to the HEV in the 20-30 mile range hadperiods of 60+ mph highway driving and the accelerations were significantly more
aggressive
Most Savings Least Savings
Deep Dive into Real-World PHEV Simulations
-
7/31/2019 NTREL PHEV
20/20
20
Summary and Conclusions
PHEVs provide petroleum displacement through fuelflexibility
Design needs to consider a spectrum of stakeholderobjectives
Analysis of real-world travel behavior providesperspective on design challenges
Vehicles designed as all-electric likely to operate as blended Whats emissions impact of real-world blended operation
In-use petroleum displacement not tied to all-electricrange
Consider energy equivalentall-electric range
PHEV benefit is strongly related to distance andaggressiveness of real-world usage