nsac final repair regs update 080414-final b... · the final tangible property regulations and...
TRANSCRIPT
7/18/2014
1
Implementation Issues: The Final Tangible Property Regulations and Proposed Disposition RegulationsNational Society of Accountants for Cooperatives Tax & Accounting Conference
August 4, 2014
San Diego, CA
Notice
ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG or Teresa Castanias, CPA TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYER OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTERS ADDRESSED HEREIN.
You (and your employees, representatives, or agents) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation, the tax treatment or tax structure, or both, of any
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
1
p , , , , ytransaction described in the associated materials we provide to you, including, but not limited to, any tax opinions, memoranda, or other tax analyses contained in those materials.
The information contained herein is of a general nature and based on authorities that are subject to change. Applicability of the information to specific situations should be determined through consultation with your tax adviser.
Agenda
• Status Report on Tangible Property Regulations and related guidance
• Overview of “next steps”: What you should be doing right now
• Specific Coop’s Implementation Strategies and I
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
2
Issues
• Land O’Lakes
• Darigold
• General Discussion of Common Implementation Issues
7/18/2014
2
Status Report: TangibleProperty Regulations
Long Road to Here
January 20, 2004 Notice 2004-6 announces government’s plan to develop tangibles regs
August 21, 2006 Government issues first set of proposed regulations
March 10, 2008 Government withdraws 2006 proposed regulations and issues new proposal
December 27, 2011 2008 proposed regulations withdrawn and replaced with third proposal (also issued as temporary regulations, so effective immediately)
September 19, 2013 Final regulations published for acquisition costs and for repair and maintenance costs; proposed regulations issued for dispositions
( )
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
4
January 24, 2014 Revenue Procedure 2014-16 issued (repair and maintenance)
February 28, 2014 Revenue Procedure 2014-17 issued (dispositions)
Pending Final disposition regulations; industry guidance for cable TV, natural gas, retailers
Newly opened Industry guidance for restaurants and mining
Final and Proposed Repair Regulations - Overview
The final repair regulations are effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014
Taxpayers may early adopt the final repair regulations for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.
Taxpayers may also choose to apply the 2011 temporary regulations for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012 and before January 1, 2014
Proposed dispositions regulations
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
5
When finalized, will be effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014
Taxpayers may also choose to apply the proposed or temporary dispositions regulations for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012 and before January 1, 2014.
7/18/2014
3
The tangible property regulations
Organization of regulations – three “buckets”
Acquisition costs
– Transaction costs
– De minimis rule – safe harbor election
– Materials and supplies
Repair and maintenance costs
New book conformity election or
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
6
– New book conformity election, or
– File a method change:
Unit of property
Capitalization standards
Dispositions
– Partial dispositions, including building structural components
– General asset accounts
Summary of Significant Changes
Acquisition Costs (Final)
$5000 per item book-conformity safe harbor
Materials and supplies definition includes $200 items (rather than $100)
Focus on facilitative and inherently facilitative costs
Repair and Maintenance Costs (Final)
Election to follow book capitalization policy
Routine maintenance safe harbor
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
7
– Extended to buildings (with a 10-year testing period)
– Network assets ineligible (pipelines)
Casualty loss “double dip” rule relaxed
Treatment of removal costs clarified
Dispositions/GAAs (Proposed)
Disposition rules significantly modified
Losses allowable for MACRS partial dispositions but generally not permitted for GAAs
Common method changes and elections
Election Method Change
Area of focus Item
Election made with affirmative statement
Election made by
reporting on the return
Method change with
481(a) adjustment
Method change with
limited 481(a)
AcquisitionCosts
Book de minimis policy
Materials and supplies
Election to capitalize & depreciate rotable or
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
8
ptemporary spares
Repairs andImprovements
Repairs vs. improvements
Book conformityelection
Dispositions
Partial disposition
Late partial disposition election
Complete assetdisposition
7/18/2014
4
Automatic method changes - Rev. Proc. 2014-16 and Rev. Proc. 2014-17
Changes qualify for the automatic consent procedures of Rev. Proc. 2011-14
“Scope limitations” waived temporarily (tax years beginning before 2015)
After expiration of scope limitation waiver, changes will still be eligible for automatic consent, but scope limitations will apply (i.e., if under exam must consider window periods; only one automatic change within a 5 year period; etc.)
Additional requirements
The authority for each change must be described in the Form 3115
The unit of property for repairs changes must be described in the Form 3115
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
9
Section 263A
No requirement that 263A methods be in compliance to file an automatic change
Must consider 263A in calculating the 481(a) adjustment
Adds additional changes under 263A to the automatic consent procedures
Section 481(a) adjustment
Cooperatives (within meaning of section 1381(a)) must generally take a section 481(a) adjustment into account in 1 year, whether positive or negative. See section 5.04(3)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14.
Taxpayers that are not cooperatives generally spread positive 481(a) adjustments over 4 years
Rev. Proc. 2014-16 and 2014-17 – Form 3115 Filing Requirements
Generally, a taxpayer filing an accounting method change under Rev. Proc. 2011-14 must:
Complete and file Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, in duplicate
Original application must be attached to taxpayer’s timely filed (including any extension) original federal income tax return implementing the change in method of accounting for the year of change, and
File copy of Form 3115 no earlier than the first day of the year of change and no later than the date the taxpayer files the original with the federal income tax return for the year of change with:
– IRS in Ogden UT (Ogden copy) – Single Form 3115 for two or more concurrent changes in
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
10
IRS in Ogden, UT (Ogden copy) Single Form 3115 for two or more concurrent changes in certain cases. For example,
Same identified unit of property (UOP) or, in the case of a building, the same identified building structure or building system
Citation of regulatory section that provides proposed method(s) of accounting
Changes of UOP, building structure or building system must include description of the UOP, building structure or building system under current and proposed method of accounting
Section 481(a) adjustments can be netted for adjustments related to the same identified unit of property (UOP) or, in the case of a building, the same identified building structure or building system
Overview of Next Steps: What should I be doing now?
Develop a work plan to evaluate impact of final regulations and safe harbors
Determine company’s objective – compliance, tax benefits, etc.
Review current financial accounting capitalization policies and procedures for tangible property
Review current unit of property definitions for capitalization, retirements, or IFRS readiness and application of current or pending industry specific guidance
Consider potential application and benefits of available safe harbors (de minimis book
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
11
Consider potential application and benefits of available safe harbors (de minimis, book conformity, RMSH)
Consider preferred timing of implementation – 2014, or earlier?
Begin cataloging the various method changes and annual elections that will be required to implement the regulations consistent with company’s objective
Prepare for discussions with financial auditors and IRS CAP team (if applicable)
Consider any method changes needed for 2013 tax year
7/18/2014
5
Goals and Objectives in Implementation of Regulations
Typical goals for cooperative taxpayers:
Compliance with the law
– What must be done and when? Do I have to file Form 3115’s?
Questions and concerns from external auditors
– What will be required for financial statement purposes?
Potential favorable opportunities
– Impact on patronage income and patronage computation
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
12
Addressing different approaches (e.g. acquired companies, multiple business units)
Simplicity
– What have I done for book purposes? How does it compare to the regulations?
– Many have found book is not that different , and book can be coordinated with tax
Always thoroughly consider the complexities in tracking book and tax differences, not just in depreciation methods now but in what is actually capitalized
Repair Regulations Implementation Panel
Mary Denler, Land O’Lakes, Inc.Sharon Appelt, Darigold, Inc.
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
13
Repair Study Joke
What are the most important factors to consider when undertaking the implementation of the final repair regulations?
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
14
… wait for it
…wait for it
7/18/2014
6
Repair Study Joke
Location, Location, Location
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
15
Timing, timing, timing
Land O’Lakes Implementation
• LOL had voluntarily capitalized 1.606% of repair expenses since 1999.
• The capitalization rate was an estimation of repair expenditures which should have been capitalized based on the error rate during the 1997-1998 IRS
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
16
audit.
• The conclusion to voluntarily capitalize a portion of the repair expenditures was taken after a very lengthy and contentious IRS audit of the repair expense accounts.
16
Land O’Lakes Implementation
• Effective, for the tax year 2008 the IRS issued new repair capitalization regulations Prop Reg § 1.162-4 , Prop Reg §1.263(a)-1 , Prop Reg § 1.263(a)-2 , Prop Reg § 1.263(a)-3 IR 2006-130.
• The new regulations provided that an amount paid that materially increased the value of a unit of property, or that
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
17
y p p y,restores a unit of property, is an improvement which must be capitalized.
• The proposed regulations also provided very specific rules that would determine whether a material increase or a restoration has occurred.
17
7/18/2014
7
Land O’Lakes Implementation
• LOL filed an incidental repair 3115’s for 2005, 2006, and 2007 to expense minor repairs of buildings which were capitalized.
• The UOP concept per the new regulations allowed us to expense immaterial repairs of the UOP.
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
18
• We filed two 3115’s with 2008 return.
• Consolidated 1120C, and
• PAN, LLC 1065 partnership return
18
Land O’Lakes Implementation
• Results: • More than $13 million recaptured in repair study
• More than $50,000,000 of PPE additions reviewed
• $2 million in cash tax savings in year one
• We closed our 2006 2007 2008 audit without
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
19
• We closed our 2006, 2007, 2008 audit without adjustment to our fixed assets.
• A depreciation engineer reviewed the 3115’s
19
Land O’Lakes Implementation
• Temporary regulations issued:
• Determined that we have to revisit repair study
• Reviewed the 19 talking points of temporary regulations with fixed asset staff
• Planned to wait on final regulations – too much minutia on GAA etc Hoping that the de minimis mess would be
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
20
GAA, etc. Hoping that the de minimis mess would be clarified.
• We dispensed with one 3115 in the 2012 return
• We have a second 3115 in our 2013 return for the remainder of the repairs study “claw back” and alignment with final regulations
20
7/18/2014
8
Land O’Lakes Implementation
• Final regulations issued: • Our repair study “claw back” contemplates the final
regulations
• “Claw back” approximately $3 million
• We are filing the de minimis election in all returns
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
21
g
• We are not filing book conformity elections
• We have incidental repairs and maintenance items in inventory we have to deal with in our 2014 return
• Our inventory of deferreds on all of these exercises is nil.
21
Status at Darigold on Implementation
• We are filing the de minimis election
• Most likely not filing book conformity elections
• We are filing a change in accounting method for repair parts
• Expense as supplies repair parts
El i li & d i db
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
22
• Elect to capitalize & depreciate standby emergency spare parts
• We have been expensing repairs for tax purposes for many years creating book/tax differences
• More work to be done for change in accounting method and 481 adjustment related to repairs vs. improvements
General Discussion of Major Implementation Issues
7/18/2014
9
Big Picture: Compliance
My company doesn’t care about timing. Can I just follow books?
My company is a cooperative. I know we can go back and review prior year’s repairs expense and capitalized amounts, but we don’t need additional income or expense at the cooperative level. Do I have to do anything with the old years?
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
24
Should I wait to see if the IRS issues additional guidance before doing anything?
My company is a cooperative that pays patronage on a “book basis”. Since these rules only affect the tax return, is there anything I should be concerned with for my patronage dividend?
Acquisition/De minimis Costs
1. My company’s minimum capitalization policy is higher than $5,000. Can I still elect the de minimis safe harbor?
2. We have a minimum capitalization policy and we try to follow it, but some plant managers aren’t consistent. Can we still elect the de minimis safe harbor?
3. We have different minimum capitalization policies for different categories of costs. Can I still elect the safe harbor?
4. My company currently follows specific guidance for certain costs, such as smallwares and truck tires Can I keep using these if I make the book conformity safe harbor?
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
25
truck tires. Can I keep using these if I make the book conformity safe harbor?
5. For any given part, we might repair and reuse it, or we might scrap it, depending on a particular part’s condition when it is removed. Are these “rotables”?
6. What if my financial statements are reviewed, not audited, and the coop’s policy is to expense capital items under $1,000?
7. What is the interaction of the de minimis rule with materials and supplies (for example, amounts less than $200)?
8. Can I break the unit of property into smaller, less expensive, components?
Capitalization Standards
1. Can I use a cost or percentage based standard to compute repair costs?
2. How do I treat periodic “refreshes” of our buildings, especially for non-retail space where we don’t have (and aren’t expecting) an IIR?
3. We don’t have a companywide capitalization policy – plant managers make the decisions and send the info to company HQ – so there isn’t 100% consistency. What do I do?
4. The regulations discuss a laundry with various “lines” that do specific functions of the laundry – wash, dry, press, etc. Those individual lines are considered a “unit of property” in the regulations. Can you discuss the practical implications of this?
• What if our GAAP policy does not define the capitalization of items with respect to the same “unit of
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
26
at ou G po cy does ot de e t e cap ta at o o te s t espect to t e sa e u t oproperty” as you do for tax purposes?
• What if our fixed asset system has not been set up to identify things this way?
5. Our cooperative is on the tax basis for computing its patronage income, and has a patronage net operating loss carryover (NOL). A change in accounting method will generate patronage income greater than the NOL. How should this unusual patronage income be distributed to patrons? Or can/should it be kept in the cooperative’s permanent reserves?
6. We know there are items on our fixed asset listing that could have been expensed, but we don’t want to do the analysis or make any changes to our past tax accounting for these items. Can we do that? If so, how do we let the IRS know? If not, how far back do we have to go?
7/18/2014
10
Systems Issues
My company’s fixed asset systems aren’t configured to track some of the information required by the tangibles regulations. For example, we cannot:
Track the remaining basis of building components
Match or link prior year retirement(s) with the corresponding replacement asset(s)
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
27
( )
Separately identify rotable or temporary spare parts
Distinguish between incidental and non-incidental materials and supplies
Implement changes in the fixed asset system for a large depreciation or repairs study
What are some options we should consider?
Dispositions
1. I didn't read the entire 100-page revenue procedure on method changes for dispositions. Bottom line – what do I need to know?
2. Do we need to consider the General Asset Accounts method anymore? What advantages would there be to doing that?
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
28
General Q & A
What questions do you have?
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
29
7/18/2014
11
APPENDIX -Details of Regulations and Implementation Strategies
Practical ImplementationConsiderations
Practical Implementation Considerations
Implementation Considerations
Should I adopt the temporary, proposed or final regulations?
Do I file a Form 3115 or make an election?
Will I calculate a Section 481(a) adjustment or will it be a “cutoff” method?
Elections are different from accounting method changes
No Form 3115 is required (exception for certain “late” elections)
Requirements for making elections are outlined in regulations – no one rule
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
32
Requirements for making elections are outlined in regulations no one rule
White paper statement required? – no one rule
Taxpayers following book with no prior repairs study
In general, taxpayers following book will be overcapitalizing expenditures
Analyze book capitalization policy to identify where taxpayer can accelerate expenditures for tax through current deduction or accelerated depreciation
Can book and tax be the same? What are the implications to cooperative patronage income and patronage deduction of the two being different?
7/18/2014
12
Implementation Steps
If you haven’t started, now is the time!
Steps to determining impact on your cooperative:
Get a copy of the final repair regulations and latest proposed disposition regulations and
related current Revenue Procedures
Attend a couple of webinars and go to the AICPA or large accounting firm websites for good
information on implementation
Review your GAAP policies on what is capitalized vs expensed
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
33
y p p p
Review your GAAP policies on what you do with materials and supplies and compare to the 4
options you will have for tax purposes
Review your GAAP policies on what you do with rotable and temporary spare parts and
compare to the 3 options you will have for tax purposes
Review your assets to determine what will be the Unit of Property (UOP) for an asset
Implementation Steps (continued)
Review fixed asset listing and repairs and maintenance accounts to determine if you have an
opportunity to change your method of accounting for the item under the regulations.
– Consider carefully whether you want to do that in light of your cooperative’s goals for
patronage
– Impact on patronage dividend if you are on the tax basis
– Impact on tax carryovers or carrybacks if you are on the book basis
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
34
Review your treatment of dispositions for GAAP and tax
Review elections and accounting method changes that may apply in light of what you have found
Consider preferred timing of implementation – 2014 or earlier?
Begin cataloging the various method changes and annual elections that will be required to implement the regulations consistent with your company’s objectives
Set timeline and steps to implement your decisions
The tangible property regulations
Organization of regulations – three “buckets”
Acquisition costs
– Transaction costs
– De minimis rule – safe harbor election
– Materials and supplies
Repair and maintenance costs
New book conformity election or
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
35
– New book conformity election, or
– File a method change:
Unit of property
Capitalization standards
Dispositions
– Partial dispositions, including building structural components
– General asset accounts
7/18/2014
13
Acquisition costs
Transaction costs
Tax
Facilitative Costs – an amount paid in the process of investigating or otherwise pursuing the transaction
Invoice cost
Inherently facilitative costs (partial list):
– Transportation costs
– Appraisal costs
GAAP
Historical cost – purchase price (less cash discounts); includes sales tax
Transportation charges (e.g., freight)
Installation & assembly
Testing and design
Closing costs
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
37
Appraisal costs
– Sales and transfer taxes
– Architectural
– Installation costs, etc.
Other facilitative costs
– Whether & which test applies to real property only
Employee labor excluded
g
– Attorney fees
– Title
– Recording
Land grading, filling, draining, and clearing
De minimis rule - safe harbor
2011 ceiling replaced with a safe harbor
Requirements to use the safe harbor
Taxpayer has written procedures at the beginning of the taxable year treating as an expense for non-tax purposes amounts paid for property:
– Costing less than a specified dollar amount; or
– Having an economic useful life of 12 months or less
T t t i AFS
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
38
Taxpayer treats as an expense in AFS
Amount eligible for safe harbor may not exceed $5,000 per invoice (or per item on invoice)
– Additional costs (e.g., delivery and installation) not included if not on the same invoice
Requires annual, irrevocable election
– May amend for 2012 or 2013 unless no written policy
Higher amounts allowed if clear reflection of income
7/18/2014
14
De minimis rule – FAQs
What if my book threshold is less than $5,000 per item?
What if my book threshold is more than $5,000 per item?
How are bulk purchases handled?
Can I break the unit of property into smaller, less expensive, components?
What is the interaction of the de minimis rule with materials and supplies (for example, amounts less than $200)?
Is the annual de minimis election made at the subsidiary level or at the consolidated or group
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
39
level? Can there be one written policy for the group? What if the cooperative has a taxable subsidiary, and wants a different election for the cooperative vs the taxable subsidiary?
What is the definition of an applicable financial statement?
What if my financial statements are reviewed, not audited, and the coop’s policy is to expense capital items under $1,000?
Does section 263A apply to amounts expensed under the de minimis safe harbor?
We have different minimum capitalization policies for different categories of costs. Can I still elect the safe harbor? How do I disclose this?
De minimis rule - safe harbor election
How to make the annual election
Statement attached to the timely filed original income tax return (including extensions)
The statement must be titled “Section 1.263(a)-1(f) de minimis safe harbor election” and include the following:
– taxpayer's name,
– address,
t id tifi ti b
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
40
– taxpayer identification number,
– and a statement that the taxpayer is making the de minimis safe harbor election under §1.263(a)-1(f).
Parent must list the name and identification number of each consolidated group member making the election.
40
Accounting for materials and supplies
Options for accounting for materials and supplies:
Deduct “non-incidental” materials and supplies when used or consumed, unless they are used in a capital improvement
Deduct “incidental” materials and supplies in the year purchased
Deduct any material and supply in the year
GAAP comparison:
Spare parts (replacement items such as motors) are generally capitalized as part of property
Insignificant spare parts may be treated as prepaid expense or supplies inventory
Spare parts not in use are depreciated over f f /
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
41
Deduct any material and supply in the year purchased if it qualifies under the de minimis rule
Capitalize and depreciate only materials and supplies that are rotable, temporary, or emergency standby spare parts (can’t go back!)
remaining life of equipment/property
Tools, dies, patterns, utensils, etc.
– Expense immediately
– Amortize over life of product or shorter period if short lived or subject to disappearance
7/18/2014
15
Materials and supplies
Materials and supplies defined:
1. A component acquired to maintain, repair, or improve a unit of tangible property owned, leased, or serviced by the taxpayer
2. A unit of property with an economic useful life of 12 months or less
3. A unit of property that has an acquisition or production cost of $200 or less
4. Fuel, lubricants, water and similar items that are reasonably expected to be consumed within 12 months or less, beginning when used in the taxpayer’s operations
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
42
g g p y p
5. Property identified in published guidance as M&S
6. Rotable, temporary, or emergency stand-by spare parts
Rotable and Temporary Spare Parts
Me Method 2
Capitalize and depreciate starting upon acquisition
Method 1
Deduct full basis on final disposition
Important Note
MAY deduct under de minimis rule unless optional method is used or election to capitalize and
Method 3
Optional method –exchange type treatment.
Deducting when placed in service and capitalizing repair costs of broken item
Options for accounting for spares:
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
43
depreciate is madecosts of broken item
If elected, generally applies to entire pool
REQUIRED IF USED FOR BOOKS AND RECORDS
Transition rules for Acquisitions Costs (cont.)
Method Changes
Change 186* – to deduct non-incidental materials and supplies when used or consumed
Change 187 – to deduct incidental materials and supplies when purchased
Change 188 – to deduct non-incidental rotable and temporary spare parts when disposed of
Change 189 – to the optional method for rotable and temporary spare parts
Change 192* – to capitalize acquisition or production costs (and depreciate them)
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
44
Change 193* – to the whether and which test for real property
Annual Elections
De minimis rule (as discussed, requires affirmative statement)
Capitalization of employee compensation or overhead as acquisition cost
Election to capitalize and depreciate rotable, temporary, or emergency stand by spares
*Modified 481(a) - applies to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Certain exceptions may apply (e.g., optional method for rotables)
7/18/2014
16
FAQs – Materials and supplies
My company currently follows specific guidance for certain costs, such as smallwares and truck tires. Can I keep using these if I make the book conformity safe harbor?
For any given part, we might repair and reuse it, or we might scrap it, depending on a particular part’s condition when it is removed. Are these “rotables”?
Can I use a cost or percentage based standard to compute repair costs?
How do I treat periodic “refreshes” of our buildings, especially for non-retail space where we don’t have (and aren’t expecting) an IIR?
My company’s fixed asset systems aren’t configured to track some of the information required by the tangibles regulations. For example, we cannot:
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
45
– Track the remaining basis of building components
– Match or link prior year retirement(s) with the corresponding replacement asset(s)
– Separately identify rotable or temporary spare parts
– Distinguish between incidental and non-incidental materials and supplies
– Implement changes in the fixed asset system for a large depreciation or repairs study
What are some options we should consider?
I didn't read the entire 100-page revenue procedure on method changes for dispositions. Bottom line – what do I need to know?
Repair and maintenance or capital improvements?
The Second “Bucket” – Repair and Maintenance Costs
Book capitalization election
Book typically over-capitalizes
Applies to amounts capitalized; not expensed
No 3115 required for expenses or if book always followed (IRS public statements)
File Form 3115 – alternatives:
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
47
1. Form 3115 to accelerate tax deductions for previously capitalized improvements
Requires 481(a) adjustment
Statistical sample usually required
2. Form 3115 with zero or minimal 481(a)
Practical way to follow book without filing a Form 3115
Prior method change / study
7/18/2014
17
Election to follow book capitalization policy
Taxpayer may elect to capitalize otherwise deductible repairs
If incurred in trade or business; and
Capitalized in books and records regularly used in computing income.
Must be applied to all amounts paid for repair and maintenance of tangible property that taxpayer treats as capital expenditures on its books and records in that taxable year.
Note that this doesn’t apply to amounts expensed for book purposes, including under the de minimis rule.
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
48
The annual election is irrevocable
Book capitalization election
How to make the annual election
Statement attached to the timely filed original income tax return (including extensions)
The statement must be titled “Section 1.263(a)-3(n) election” and include the following:
– taxpayer's name,
– address,
– taxpayer identification number,
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
49
– and a statement that the taxpayer is making the election to capitalize repair and maintenance costs under §1.263(a)-3(n).
Parent must list the name and identification number of each consolidated group member making the election.
File Form 3115 - unit of property
Buildings Everything Else
Default Rule Plant Property Network AssetsSingle UOP
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
50
Functional Interdependence
Discrete and major function
Facts & circumstances -industry specific
7/18/2014
18
Plant Property – Three Step Analysis
“Plant property” rules particularly important for manufacturing operations
Step one: identify “functionally interdependent” assets
Step two: identify “discrete and major functions” within the property identified in step one
Step three: identify “major components” of the UOPs identified in step two (you will need that later)
Standard is largely factual
I t i ith l t ti l i l bl
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
51
Interviews with plant operations personnel are invaluable
Publicly available information (website, tour materials, educational materials, etc.) describing “what we do” may be useful as well . . . and are likely to be considered by IRS
One more step
After identifying the “unit of property,” the taxpayer must identify any “major components” or “substantial structural parts” of that UOP
This is required for any UOP, not just plant property
Costs incurred to replace either a major component or a substantial structural part of a UOP must be capitalized as a restoration
Major component
A major component is a part or combination of parts that performs a “discrete and critical”
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
52
j p p p pfunction in the operation of the unit of property.
Example: wiring is a major component of a building’s electrical system because it performs a discrete and critical function in the operation of the electrical system
Substantial structural part
A substantial structural part is a part or combination of parts that comprises a large portion of the physical structure of the unit of property
Example: 100 windows are a substantial structural part of a building’s structure, where the building’s 300 windows represent 90% of the total surface area of the building
Plant Property – Regulations’ Examples
Electric power plant
Structure
Boiler
Turbine
Generator
Each coal pulverizer
Commercial laundry facility
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
53
Commercial laundry facility
Sorter
Boiler
Washer
Dryer
Ironer
Folder
Waste water treatment system
7/18/2014
19
Unit of property – buildings
Entire building
Determine UOPApply
Capitalization Standards
Building structure
Building systems
Capitalize Improvements
to UOP
Entire building
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
54
HVAC
Plumbing system
Electrical system
All escalators
All elevators
Fire protection
Security system
Gas distribution
GAAP capitalization standards
Costs incurred during ownership consist of additions, improvements, alterations, rehabilitations, replacements, repairs, etc.
Capitalized cost -
appreciably extend the life,
increase the capacity, or
improve the efficiency or safety of the property
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
55
Consideration of materiality is always applicable
File Form 3115 - capitalization standards - detail
1. Material condition or defect at acquisition or production
2. Material addition, including a physical enlargement, expansion, extension, or addition of a major
Betterment Restoration
1. Component loss
2. Gain/loss on sale of a component
3. Casualty loss
4. Return to former operating condition – no longer
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
56
component; or a material increase in the capacity
3. Reasonably expected to materially increase the productivity, efficiency, strength, quality, or output
Adaptation
functioning
5. Rebuild to like new condition after the class life
6. Replacement of a major component or substantial structural part
Showroom to manufacturing
Walk-in medical clinic
Grocery - sushi
Hospital emergency room
7/18/2014
20
Book Conformity Safe Harbor
Taxpayer may elect to capitalize otherwise deductible repair and maintenance costs
If incurred in trade or business; and
Capitalized in books and records regularly used in computing income.
Must be applied to all amounts paid for repair and maintenance of tangible property that taxpayer treats as capital expenditures on its books and records in that taxable year.
Not a pure “book conformity” safe harbor
D t l t t d f b k
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
57
Does not apply to amounts expensed for book purposes
– The annual election is irrevocable
– There are strategic uses, but also downsides
Would this be useful to cooperatives who want to minimize possible book/tax differences?
Exception to general capitalization standard – Routine Maintenance Safe Harbor (RMSH)
Permits a current deduction for certain otherwise capital expenditures that the taxpayer expects to perform at least twice during the unit of property’s “ADS class life”
Key is initial expectation of performing the activity at least twice – even if ultimately that does not happen
Final Regulations extend RMSH to buildings
Must use 10-year testing period rather than 40-year ADS class life for buildings
Potentially useful for planned “refreshes” expected to occur twice within 10-year period
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
58
y p p y p
Be careful not to include the cost of new equipment, furnishings, etc., in the scope of costs deducted under RMSH -- applies only to “repair and maintenance costs”
RMSH continues to be applicable to costs of replacing “major components”
Does not apply to certain types of activities or property
Betterments or adaptations of property to a new or different use
Certain types of restorations (for example, where a casualty loss was claimed)
Network assets
Example – major component or substantial structural part
Treas. Reg. 1.263(a)-3(k)(7) Examples 25, 26, and 27
300 exterior windows represent 25 percent of surface area of building
The windows represent a major component of the building structure (discrete and critical)
– Replacement of 100 of 300 windows is not a significant portion of a major component
– Replacement of 200 of 300 windows is a significant portion of a major component
Assume that 300 windows represent 90 percent of the surface area of the building
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
59
– Again, the windows represent a major component of the building structure (discrete and critical)
– The windows are also a substantial structural part of the building because they comprise a “large portion of the physical structure” of the building
Replacement of 100 of the 300 windows is considered the replacement of a substantial structural part because the windows represent 30 percent of the surface area of the building
7/18/2014
21
Building examples (cont.) – major component or substantial structural part
Not a major component or substantial structural part:
Replacement of floors in lobby of hotel (lobby represented 10% of total square footage)
Replacement of 8 of 20 sinks in retail building (restrooms on 2 of 3 floors)
Replacement of 30% of wiring in building
Replacement of a major component or substantial structural part:
Replacement of all floors in public areas of hotel (represented 40% of total square footage)
Replacement of all toilets and all sinks in retail building (restrooms on 2 of 3 floors)
Replacement of all wiring in building
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
60
Replacement of 30% of wiring in building
Replacement of 3 of 10 roof mounted HVAC units
Replacement of 1 of 3 furnaces in single HVAC system
Replacement of entire roof membrane
p g g
Replacement of one chiller unit in single HVAC system
Replacement of sprinkler system
Replacement of entire roof
Building examples – betterments
Not a betterment:
Building refresh – cosmetic & layout changes; flooring repairs, moving a wall; patching holes, repainting; repairing ceiling tiles; flooring repairs
Addition of concrete lining to prevent oil from seeping into meet processing plant
Replacement of roof membrane
Betterment:
Building remodel – replacement of large sections of walls (with windows); rebuilding interior and exterior facades; replacement ceilings and ceramic flooring; rebuilding walls, etc.
Material increase in strength – addition of expansion bolts to building foundation –regulatory requirement for earthquake safety
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
61
Replacement of roof membrane
Replacement of 2 of 10 roof mounted HVAC units (10% more energy efficient)
safety
Material increase in capacity –reinforcement of columns and girders 50% greater load carrying capacity
Material addition and increase in capacity –new stairway and mezzanine to retail building
Material increase in efficiency – addition of new insulation to building
481(a) calculations – stat sampling permitted - Rev. Proc. 2011-42
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
62
7/18/2014
22
Example 1 – Invoice documentation of HVAC repair
“Installed new compressor in Trane roof unit. Checked for
leaks and changed unit”
Acceptabledocumentation:
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
63
Example 2 – Incomplete documentation - electrical
Incomplete documentation:
Per this invoice, the drawings or an interview with facilities would be required
“Begin installation of electrical as per
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
64
pdrawings”
Transition rules for repairs and improvements (cont.)
Method Changes
Change 184 – to deduct amounts paid or incurred for repair and maintenance or a change to capitalize such amounts as improvements (including unit of property determinations)
■ Rev. Proc. 2014-16 requires that the authority for each change be described in the Form 3115
■ Rev. Proc. 2014-16 requires that the unit of property for each change b d ib d i th F 3115
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
65
be described in the Form 3115
Change 185 – to the regulatory accounting method
Annual Elections
Election to capitalize items capitalized for financial reporting purposes (book)
7/18/2014
23
FAQs and Specific Cooperative Issues
The regulations discuss a laundry with various “lines” that do the specific functions of the laundry – wash, dry, press, etc. Those individual lines are considered a “unit of property” in the regulations. Can you discuss the practical implications of this?
What if our GAAP policy does not define the capitalization of items with respect to the same “unit of property” as you do for tax purposes?
What if our fixed asset accounting system has not been set up to identify things this way?
We know there are items on our fixed asset listing that could have been expensed, but we don’t want to do the analysis or make any changes to our past tax accounting for these items. Can
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
66
we do that? If so, how do we let the IRS know? If not, how far back do we have to go?
Our cooperative makes extensive repairs/major refurbishing (called “shutdowns”) to various production lines on a regular (e.g. every 3 years) basis. For book, these shutdowns are capitalized for book purposes and amortized over 3 years. For tax, these shutdowns are expensed. Will the new regulations impact this treatment? Could we go to the book method with the same amortization period if we want?
Our cooperative is on the tax basis for computing its patronage income, and has a patronage net operating loss carryover (NOL). A change in accounting method will generate patronage income greater than the NOL. How should this unusual patronage income be distributed to patrons? Or can/should it be kept in the cooperative’s permanent reserves?
Dispositions
Dispositions
A “disposition” is a transfer of ownership of the asset or the permanent withdrawal of an asset from the trade or business.
Includes:
– Sale or exchange
– Retirement
– Physical abandonment
D t ti
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
68
– Destruction
– Transfer to a supplies, scrap, or similar account
– A portion of an asset
Including elective treatment for building structural components
– Involuntary conversion
7/18/2014
24
Completely revised disposition rules
Temporary Regulations relied heavily on general asset accounts to permit partial dispositions of building components
Taxpayers expressed various practical concerns about the GAA rules
Treasury and IRS have proposed a completely different approach
Proposed rules are designed to give taxpayers the same flexibility in recognizing (or forgoing) a loss upon the disposition of a component of a MACRS asset (a “partial disposition”) regardless whether the property is held in a GAA
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
69
Recognizing a loss upon partial dispositions generally is elective, but is mandatory in four specific circumstances (e.g., casualty loss, involuntary conversions)
Treatment of partial disposition determined on original return – not as a method change
– Limited exception where IRS disallows repair deduction related to partial disposition of asset still owned by taxpayer as of beginning of the year of change
Basis considerations
Allows use of a reasonable method, and provides non-exclusive examples
Partial Dispositions under 2013 Proposed Regulations
Default Treatment General Asset Account Election
General rule:
– Depreciation stops
– Gain or loss recognized on disposition of entire asset, or
– Partial disposition from casualty, sale certain non-recognition
General rule:
– Depreciation continues - no immediate recovery of basis
Exceptions:
Disposition of all or last asset in the
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
70
sale, certain non-recognition transactions
Partial disposition - optional annual election*
– any portion of an asset
*Amended return or method change for 2012 or 2013
– Disposition of all or last asset in the account
– Qualifying dispositions:
Casualty
Charitable Contribution
Termination or sale of business
Non-recognition transactions
Observations
Planning considerations:
Partial disposition election made on a timely filed return in the year of disposition
Limited partial dispositions for assets in GAAs (building structural components)
Simplified methods for identifying adjusted basis disposed of
Need income? Consider making the GAA election
Method change to recover stranded basis (ghost assets) available after 2013?
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
71
7/18/2014
25
Transition rules for Dispositions (cont.)
Method Changes (partial list)
Change 176 – changes (GAA or non-GAA assets) in identification or grouping
Change 177 – disposition of a building structural component or partial disposition
Change 178 – disposition of tangible depreciable assets (other than buildings)
Change 179 – disposition of tangible depreciable asset in GAA
Change 180 – late general asset account elections
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
72
Change 196 – late partial disposition election
Change 197 – revocation of general asset account election
Change 198 – Partial disposition upon IRS adjustment
Annual Elections
Partial disposition election
Example – dispositions method change
Roof replacement
X, a calendar year taxpayer, acquired and placed in service a building and its structural components in 1990
In 2000, X replaced the entire roof of the building
X did not recognize a loss on the retirement of the original roof and continues to depreciate the original roof.
X also capitalized and depreciated the cost of the replacement roof
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
73
X also capitalized and depreciated the cost of the replacement roof
X may file an automatic change to make a late partial disposition election for the original roof to recognizing a loss upon its retirement. The § 481(a) adjustment is the adjusted basis of the roof as of the beginning of the year of change.
Alternatively, X may file an automatic change under the temporary regulations to treat the building as an asset and each structural component of the building as a separate asset for disposition purposes and also to change from depreciating the original roof to recognizing a loss upon its retirement. The § 481(a) adjustment is the adjusted basis of the roof as of the beginning of the year of change.
Rev. Proc. 2014-17: GAAs
Late GAA Elections
May file a method change for 2012 or 2013 to make a late GAA election for assets that were placed in service before 2012 and that the taxpayer still owns as of the year of change
Precludes new “CBS changes” for assets no longer owned
– Does not affect existing CBS changes and related section 481 adjustments
– IRS will respect late GAA elections made under early guidance for property not owned at the time of the election
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
74
Opportunity:
– Use of GAA elections may be administratively attractive to taxpayers with large volume of small dollar assets and dispositions: park it and forget it
– Late GAA elections provides limited window to “clean up” fixed asset records to group such assets if desired
7/18/2014
26
KPMG External Website
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
75
Contact information
Eric Lucas, Principal
KPMG LLP
(202) 533-3023
Teresa Castanias, CPA
916) 761-8686
James Bell, Senior Manager
KPMG LLP
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
76
Mary Denler, Tax Manager
Land O’Lakes
(651) 375-2746
Sharon Appelt, Tax Director
Darigold, Inc.
(206) 286-6790
© 2013 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. NDPPS 142311
The KPMG name, logo and “cutting through complexity” are registered trademarks or trademarks of KPMG International.
.