npsp – structure and function national polio surveillance project - india
TRANSCRIPT
NPSP – Structure and Function
National Polio Surveillance Project - India
Past to the Present
• 1997– NPSP created as a WHO-GoI collaboration– 57 Surveillance Medial Officers (SMOs) for
Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance
• 2012– 339 SMOs– AFP surveillance, Supplementary
Immunization Activities (SIA) assistance, Research, Routine Immunization (RI) and measles
Structure of NPSP
• National Polio Surveillance Unit (Delhi)
• Field staff (regional team leaders, sub regional team leaders, SMOs, Administrative Assistants, drivers)
• Field Volunteers and External Monitors
The National Polio Surveillance Unit
• the country HQ of the project
• provides
– technical support to the MOHFW
– technical, administrative and logistic support to the field staff
– support to the lab network
WR – India
Nata Menabde
WHO INDIANATIONAL SURVEILLANCE PROJECT
Project Manager
Hamid Jafari
Deputy Project ManagerOperations
Virginia Swezy
Deputy Project ManagerUIP
Stephen Sosler
Routine Immunization&
Measles Team
Finance&
AccountsTeam
Senior Technical Advisor
Sunil Bahl
1. Surveillance2. SIA3. Data4. Research
Polio Team
Regional Team Leaders
( 7 )
Field Units
RAFFPs
( 10 )
Planning Officer
Kudzai Chisewe
HR&
PersonnelTeam
Admin.
Team
The Field Offices
• led by the Surveillance Medical Officer (SMO)
• one administrative assistant and one driver
• typically located in government premises
• holder of imprest accounts for managing expenses
NPSP Field Staff
• Currently over 384 medical officers (SMOs plus Regional, Sub-Regional Team Leaders and Officers on Special Assignment)
• Average no of districts covered by one SMO now:
• UP and Bihar: 1 per district
• West Bengal/Jharkhand: 1 to 3 districts
• Rest of India: ~ 5 districts
(7 Regions)
Average no of districts covered by one SMO now:UP and Bihar: 1 per districtWest Bengal/Jharkhand: 1 to 3 districtsRest of India: ~ 5 districts
MO Locations, India
8Labs
339SMO’s
38SRTLs/ OSA’s
7RTL’s
Positions
274 locations
WHO / NPSP Structure
National Polio Surveillance Unit
Regional Team leader
Sub-regional Team Leader
Surveillance Medical Officer
National
Regions (1-7 states)
Sub-regions
District (<1-11 districts)
Blocks, in HR areas“Field Volunteer”
Main Functions
• High quality Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) surveillance
• Technical support to mass polio vaccinations campaigns - supplementary immunization activities (SIAs)
• Research activities for refinement of polio vaccination strategies
• Monitoring SIAs and Routine Immunization
• Measles Surveillance and SIAs
Acute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance Reporting Network
Reporting site
N=35,824
*Data as on 10 February 2012
• Reporting network consists of govt. and private hospitals, health centers, medical practitioners, traditional healers, temples etc.
• More than 151,000 visits made to these reporting sites for active case searches by the SMOs during 2011
• Nearly 2000 training workshops on surveillance conducted by SMOs in 2011 – 70,000 people trained
Kasauli
Delhi
Lucknow
Ahmedabad Kolkata
Mumbai
Bangalore
Chennai
National labs
Upgraded national labs
Reference lab
India Poliovirus Laboratory NetworkAcute Flaccid Paralysis Surveillance
Laboratory Network
•Children vaccinated: 172 million
• Houses visited: 220 million
•Vaccinators deployed: 2.3 million
•Supervisors: 150,000
National Immunization Days (NIDs)
Polio SIAs in India – a massive effort
• Developing guidelines
• Refining strategies for reaching children during campaigns – newborns, resistant families, migrants, hard to reach areas etc.
• Building capacity of government staff and vaccinators through ongoing training
• Monitoring campaigns to support corrective actions
Support to polio immunization campaigns
Some recent initiatives based on epidemiological analysis provided to the programme
> 1 million children vaccinated(April to December 2011)
Multipronged strategy for 107 high risk blocks in UP & Bihar
Overcoming challenges of access in Kosi river area of Bihar to reach the unreached Mitigating the risk of importations
Identifying, vaccinating and tracking all new borns for polio vaccination
Monitoring SIAs
• Independent monitoring system
• 3500 monitors across India (2000 of these in UP and Bihar) – SMOs and field volunteers of WHO-NPSP– Monitors hired locally by SMOs for the duration of the campaign– WHO staff
• Scope of monitoring in UP and Bihar: – 420,000 houses checked (1% of total houses) each round– 11,000 vaccination teams checked (8% of total teams) each round– 680,000 children checked (1% of total children) each round
• Daily feedback to supervisors and block medical officers at block and to CMO/DM at district during evening meetings
• Rapid survey at the end of the round to assess the overall coverage in the area
• Data generated through WHO-NPSP monitoring is used by the state, district and sub-district governments to improve quality of polio campaigns
Monitoring SIAs
% unimmunized children in field huts in Kosi riverine area
Source of data : NPSP monitoring
Coverage in field huts of Kosi area, Bihar
2008 2009
~ 3,000 children checked each round
2010 2011
Supporting Research for Polio Eradication
• Vaccine immunogenicity studies- Best vaccines • Sero-prevalence studies- Population immunity levels• Mucosal immunity study- Immunity levels & vaccines to boost it• Product development (IPV studies, vaccine delivery techniques)• Operational researches planned
Informed program decisions:• Switch from tOPVs to the use of mOPVs and bOPVs• Monitor the seroprevalence against polio in the HRAs• Strategize for polio “end game” and post eradication approach (Type of vaccines, RI schedule)
W.H.O.• Surveillance
• Operations
• Monitoring
UNICEF• Vaccine
• Communication
• Monitoring
Rotary• Advocacy
• Communication
• Fundraising
GoI Polio Partners
Expanded NPSP support to GoI and States
National-level Policy and strategic formulation, standards and norms
– Development of national guidelines – measles outbreak surveillance, RI monitoring, Hepatitis B and Hib-pentavalent vaccine introduction, AEFI surveillance, measles catch-up campaigns
– Participation in National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization meetings
Immunization curriculum development for Medical Officers and Health Workers
Operations research in key programme areas
State and district level Harmonization of polio and RI microplans Expansion of measles outbreak surveillance and laboratory
network Support for VPD surveillance introduction in select states Program monitoring, data management, analysis and feedback New vaccine introduction support and training
Improving and expanding RI monitoring
Methodology revised in 2009
Initially rolled out to UP, Bihar and Jharkhand
Expanded to West Bengal, Karnataka, Rajasthan
Data outputs– Session site:
Availability of manpower and logistics Reasons for session not held Safe injection practices and waste
disposal– Household surveys
RI coverage and gaps in community Reasons for left-outs and drop-outs
RI monitoring: January – December 2011
In 2011, more than 13,000 session sites and 100,000 children monitored per month in priority states of Bihar, UP and Jharkhand
StateSessions
monitored
Children surveyed
0 to 11 months12 to 23 months
Bihar 40,990 226,127 107,407
Jharkhand 8,646 35,519 16,913
Karnataka 526 2,136 1,242
Uttar Pradesh 112,859 591,170 244,724
West Bengal 1,426 8,238 5,627
TOTAL 164,447 863,190 375,913
<Empty Picture>
KRI
SBD
STPHDO
LLP
JNS
JAL
AHB
BAD
BJN
BRC
PIL
SHA
FTP
MZP
UNN
JNP
BNA
BRL
AZG
MZN
AGR
SHP
ALG
HMP
GNDBBK
PTG
BLS
MRD
KSN
FAI
BRP
GZP
RBL
GRPBST
BAL
KPN
MTR
MAI
CKT
KPD
SULCSN
ETA
MHB
SDN
MRT
LNO
DOR
CND
JPN
FER
FKB
RMP
MHG
ABN
ETW
KNA
AUR
KAN
GZA
SRWHTR
KSM
MAU
SKN
VRN
BGT
GBN
BDH
% Fully immunized children, Uttar Pradesh:
January – December 2011
5955
42
53
30
40
50
60
70
Jan(15,736)
Feb(17,124)
Mar(12,155)
Apr(16,217)
May(18,834)
Jun(19,136)
Jul(28,187)
Aug(22,807)
Sep(18,957)
Oct(19,874)
Nov(24,865)
Dec(30,832)
Non HR Block HR Block
N=
State: UPTotal Children (12-23) 244,724
Percent (%) of FI 56%
Dist with Minimum Coverage Jaunpur (34)
Dist with Maximum Coverage Hamirpur (85)
HR Blocks: UPTotal HR Blocks 66
Total Children (12-23) 47,193
Percent (%) of FI 49%
<=20
21-40
41-60
61-80
>80
Not MonitoredSource : RI HtH Monitoring data;
children 12-23 months of age N = No. of children monitored
BAD
BJN
PIL
SHA
BRL
MZN
AGR
SHP
ALG
BLS
MRD
MTR
MAI
ETA
MRT
JPN
FER
FKB
RMP
ETW
KAN
GZA
HTR
BGT
GBN
Availability of all vaccines and diluents, Bihar:
January – December 2011
67
80
81 78
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
J an(2,524)
Feb(2,813)
Mar(2,503)
Apr(3,078)
May(3,065)
J un(3,689)
J ul(3,929)
Aug(3,446)
Sep(2,796)
Oct(2,447)
Nov(3,042)
Dec(4,036)
Non HR Block HR Block
<=70
71-80
81-90
>90
Not Monitored
State: BiharSession held 37,368
All Vaccine available 23,840
Percent (%) 64
Dist with Minimum value Supaul (29)
Dist with Maximum value Kishangabj (89)
HR Block: BiharTotal HR blocks 41
Session held 4,232
All Vaccine available 2,927
Proportion 69
N=
tOPV Stock-out
Source: RI monitoring data
MCV2 introduction through catch-up campaigns
14 states, children 9m – 14 yrs– Approximately 130 million
Role of WHO NPSP:– Strategy formulation, guideline
and training module development
– Pre-campaign planning, training, establishment of AEFI management networks
– External monitors for RCA monitoring and feedback
RI: MCV1 > 80%
SIA: MCV1 <80%
NPSP assisted measles surveillance
Surveillance initiated
2006
2007
2010
2009
2011
Reporting of Clinical Measles cases, linked with AFP weekly reporting in these states; Weekly aggregate data shared with IDSP
One state level lab strengthened in each state for Lab testing for measles and rubella IgM.
200 outbreaks
# Outbreak confirmation for Measles: 2011 ≥ 2 cases IgM positive for measles, Similarly for Rubella@ Surveillance started from June, 2011 in Bihar and July 2011 in Assam and Jharkhand
* data as on 16th Jan, 2012
172 Measles outbreaks confirmed
15 Rubella outbreaks confirmed
13 Mixed outbreaks confirmed
Vaccinated Unvaccinated
Unknown
> 90% of measles cases are found among 1 - 10 years old
~ 70% of measles cases are unvaccinated
Serologically confirmed# measles, rubella and mixed outbreaks,
2011 India
Challenges
Ensuring that the message of polio eradication remains on the top of the agenda (we are not done yet!)
Trying to meet the increasing expectations to be involved in other areas;
Field MOs trying to balance all the priorities at the field level (increasing activities and overall work of already overloaded MOs);
Managing a level of uncertainty and anxiety from the field in the context of transition;
Maintaining donor funding over next 5 years (through certification and post eradication phase)