non-newtonian nature of causal hydrodynamics t. koide ( universidade federal do rio de janeiro )...
TRANSCRIPT
Non-Newtonian nature of Causal Hydrodynamics
T. Koide
(Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro)
G.S. Denicol (UFRJ),T. Kodama (UFRJ),Ph. Mota (UFRJ)
Because of causality, the relativistic dissipative fluid will bea non-Newtonian fluid. Thus1) The GKN formula should be modified.2) 1/4can be a lower bound of the shear of Newtonian fluids.3) The fluid expands to vacuum by forming a stationary wave.4) The additional viscosity is still necessary stabilize solutions.
Infinite speed in diffusion process
1 1
1 1( , ) ( , ) ( , )
2 2n n nP x t t P x t P x t
2( , ) ( , )P x t D P x tt
2ik
2
, 0limx t
xD
t
xv
t
0, 0x t
Dispersion relation
Relativistic NR equation(1+1)
22
0 02 2
k ki k
w w
02 /crik w
At , the dispersion relation is reduced to the diffusion type.crik k
>0. stable
Linear perturbation analysis
Hiscock&Lindblom(‘85)
Introduction of memory effect
( ) / ( )R
tt s
R
DJ dse n s
Equation of continuityn J
t
J D n
2n D nt
Fick’s law
Acausal (Cattaneo)Breaking sum rules (Kadanoff&Martin, T.K.)
22
20R n n D n
t t
R
DV
Landau-Lifshitz theory
0T 0N
( ) ( )T P u u g P
N nu
Equation of Continuity
heat current
bulk viscosity shear viscosity
0u 0u
Introduction of Memory Effect
1( ) 0P u
T T
u
P u
PT
( , )dsG s u
( , )P dsG s u
( , )P dsG sT
T.K.,Denicol,Mota&Kodama(2007)Entropy four current
Landau-Lifshitz
Memory effect
Causal Hydrodynamics
Dispersion relation(1+1)
0 40 80 120 160m om e n tu m
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Im w
0 40 80 120m om e n tu m
-120
-80
-40
0
40
80
120
Re
w
Stable in the sense of the linear analysis.
blue and red
Speed of light
Linear analysis of stability
LL equation CDhydro
Equilibrium
Lorentz boost
Scaling solution Stable Unstable
Stable Stable
StableUnstable
?
Hiscock& Lindblam (‘85), Kouno,Maruyama,Takagi&Saito (‘90)
The Eckert theory is more unstable than the LL theory.
u
P u
PT
( , )dsG s u
( , )P dsG s u
( , )P dsG sT
Newtonian fluid
Memory effect
Causal HydrodynamicsLandau-Lifshitz
Anomalous viscosity
Newtonian
Dilatant
ThixotropicRheopectic
Pseudoplastic
Bingham flow
Velocity gradient
Vis
cosit
y
sludge, paint,blood, ketchup
latex, paper pulp, clay solns.
quicksand, candy compounds
tars, inks, glue
Navier-Stokes
QGP ?
Common sense?
• The transport coefficients are given by the Green-Kubo-Nakano formula.
• The lower bound of the shear viscosity of the CD hydro. is given by .
• The viscosity is small correction.
• We do not need any additional viscosity in the CD hydro.
1/(4 )
Not trivial !!
Green-Kubo-Nakano formula
0
( ) ( ) ( )eq
t d A i J t
( )
( )
J tD
F t
( ) ( ) ( )t
J t ds t s F s
Exact!
In Newtonian fluid, transport coefficients are defined by
0
( ) ( )J ds s F t
We ignore the memory effect
0
( )D ds s
GKN formula
( ) ( )t
J ds t s F s
0
( )D ds s
Newtonian
( ) ( )J t DF t
Non-Newtonian
( ) /( ) ( )R
tt s
R
DJ t dse F s
D=?
( ) /( ) ( )R
tt s
R
DJ t dse F s
( ) ( ) ( )t
J t ds t s F s
0
( ) (0) ( ) ( ) ( )t sJ t F t ds s F t
1( ) ( ) ( )t
R R
DJ t J t F t
( ) (0) ( ) ( ) ( )t
t tJ t F t ds t s F s
0
(0)( ) ( ) ( ) ( )t s
GKN
J t J t ds s F tD
( ) ( )GKNJ t D F t
Markov app.
1. In the GKN formula, we need In the generalized formula, we need and 2. characterizes the deviation from the GKN formula.3. When vanishes in the low momentum limit, the new formula reproduces the GKN formula.4. The result obtained in the new formula is consistent with sum rules.
Generalization of GKN formula
1
2
T.K.&Maruyama (2004), T.K.(2005), T.K.(2007), T.K.&Kodama (2008)
1 ( );J t J
2 ( );t J
GKN formula
New formula
12
2
Lower limit of shear viscosity?
3
0
1[ ( , ), (0,0)]
2lim i txy xydtd xe T x t T
1) GKN formula
2) Absorption cross section
38( ) [ ( , ), (0,0)]i t
abs xy xy
Gdtd xe T x t T
(0)
16abs
G
G: Newton’s constant
1
4s
(0)
4abss
G
Kovtun,Son&Starinets(‘05)
Lower limit of shear viscosity?
3
0
1[ ( , ), (0,0)]
2lim i txy xydtd xe T x t T
1) GKN formula
2) Absorption cross section
38( ) [ ( , ), (0,0)]i t
abs xy xy
Gdtd xe T x t T
(0)
16abs
G
G: Newton’s constant
1
4s
(0)
4abss
G
Only for Newtonian!!
Kovtun,Son&Starinets(‘05)
Common sense?
• The transport coefficients are given by the Green-Kubo-Nakano formula.
• The lower bound of the shear viscosity of the CD hydro. is given by .
• The viscosity is small correction.1/(4 )
Universal relation between pressure and viscosity
We assume that the fluid forms a stationary wave at the boundary to vacuum. Then at the boundary,
2 00 11 01 2(1 )sc T T vT v
11 2 00T v T
P
- 8 - 4 0 4 8
0
0 . 4
0 . 8
1 . 2
pressure
(-1) * viscosity
1. The causal fluid expands as a stationary wave.
2. Viscosity can be the same order as energy density and pressure.
Common sense?
• The transport coefficients are given by the Green-Kubo-Nakano formula.
• The lower bound of the shear viscosity of the CD hydro. is given by .
• The viscosity is small correction.
• We do not need any additional viscosity in the CD hydro.
1/(4 )
Numerical oscillation
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10x
0
100
200
300
400
en
tro
py
de
nsi
ty
The frequency is the size of the grid.
unstable
-20 -10 0 10 20x
0
200
400
600
800
en
tro
py
de
nsi
ty
Usual “artificial” viscosity
2 2/u x
2/u x
/ ( / )u x u x
Navier-Stokes type:
Burnett type:
Neumann-Richtmyer type:
Generalization to relativistic cases ? Causal?
Additional causal viscosityWe need to introduce the artificial viscosity consistent with causality.
total av
av av av av
du
d
av hP
h :the size of the grid (0.01 fm)
Effect to entropy production
0 1 2 3 4 5t
4400
4410
4420
4430
4440
4450
4460
tota
l en
tro
py
The effect of the additional viscosity is
0.05%
This is the same order of the breaking of the energy conservation in our code.
Summary• The transport coefficients are given by the Green-Kubo-Nakano
formula.
• The lower bound of the shear viscosity of the CD hydro. is given by
.
• The viscosity is small correction.
• We do not need any additional viscosity in the CD hydro.
No. We need a new formula for non-Newtonian fluids
Not yet clear for causal dissipative hydro.
1/(4 )
P
We need.
No. We have a relationand forms a stationary wave.
We have to check
• Is the new formula really useful or not.
• What is the lower bound of the causal shear viscosity?
• CD hydro is a stable theory?
• Are numerical oscillations we encountered due to the problem of numerical calculation or the problem of the theory (turbulence)?
Stability and Causality(1+1)
3 2 2 2
0
10
R R R
ik i k
w
0
1
3R R
ik
w
0
Re 1limk
R
vk w
Linear perturbation analysis of the causal hydro.
Sound velocity is faster than ideal.
1Im 0
3 R
Stable, Independent of momentum
0w P
P
T.K. Denicol,Kodama&Mota (‘07)
It is difficult to cut high momentum modes to avoid unstable modes.
u uu
t x
( )ik x utu e 2 ( )i k x utu
iket
crik k 2 crik k
We need to find a new theory to satisfy causality.
Model equation of hydro
assumption
Non-linear effect