noise analysis technical report - virginia …€¦ · noise analysis technical report i route 58...

NOISE ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT

Route 58 – Martin Luther King Freeway

Portsmouth Virginia

May 2008

Prepared for:

Virginia Department of Transportation

NOISE ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT

Route 58 – Martin Luther King Freeway

Portsmouth, Virginia

VDOT Project: 0058-965-107, P101

UPC No. 76642

HMMH Report No. 300780.090

May 2008

Prepared for:

Virginia Department of Transportation

Prepared by: Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.

6767 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 216 Richmond, Virginia 23225

Noise Analysis Technical Report i

Route 58 MLK Portsmouth, Virginia May 2008 VDOT Project No. 0058-965-107,P101

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................1

1. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................2

2. NOISE TERMINOLOGY AND CRITERIA ........................................................3

3. MODELING AND PROJECTIONS ...................................................................5

3.1. HIGHWAY NOISE COMPUTATION MODEL...............................................5

3.2. TRAFFIC DATA FOR NOISE COMPUTATIONS.........................................5

3.3. COMPUTED EXISTING AND FUTURE NOISE LEVELS.............................5

4. NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ....................................................................20

5. NOISE ABATEMENT ....................................................................................21

5.1. Alternative Noise Abatement Measures..................................................21

5.1. Noise Barriers ...........................................................................................21

6. CONSTRUCTION NOISE...............................................................................23

REFERENCES .................................................................................................. R1

APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC DATA USED IN NOISE ANALYSIS ......................... A1

APPENDIX B. COMPUTED EXISTING 2007 AND FUTURE 2032 NOISE

LEVELS............................................................................................................. B1

Noise Analysis Technical Report ii


LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 1………………………………………………………………………………10

FIGURE 2……………………………………………………………………………... 11 FIGURE 3………………………………………………………………………………12 FIGURE 4………………………………………………………………………………13 FIGURE 5………………………………………………………………………………14 FIGURE 6………………………………………………………………………………15 FIGURE 7………………………………………………………………………………16 FIGURE 8………………………………………………………………………………17 FIGURE 9………………………………………………………………………………18 FIGURE 10……………………………………………………………………………..19 FIGURE 11……………………………………………………………………………..20

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 1. FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA……………………………….3

TABLE 2. NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY…………………………………………….20

TABLE 3. NOISE BARRIER SUMMARY…………………………………………..22

Noise Analysis Technical Report


1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Potential traffic noise impact associated with the extension of Martin Luther King Freeway (Route 58) in Portsmouth, Virginia, has been assessed in accordance with procedures and criteria approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The project involves a one-mile extension on new location of Route 58, from the existing interchange with London Boulevard to a new interchange with Interstate 264. The study area also includes the Interstate 264 corridor from east of South Street and Des Moines Avenue to the interchange with Route 337. The assessment has determined that noise impact will occur at 126 residential properties, a recreational center, and one section of a cemetery under the design year 2032 Build condition. Three single barriers and a two barrier system could be constructed to protect 103 impacted residential properties and benefit 71 additional residential properties. All are feasible but only single Barriers 3 and 4 would be reasonable due to cost. At one other location where impact will occur under the 2032 Build condition, a barrier would not be feasible. The barrier findings discussed in this report have been based on a very preliminary feasibility and reasonableness evaluation. Final barrier decisions will not be made until a detailed evaluation based on final project design has been completed. Construction activity may cause intermittent fluctuations in noise levels. During the construction phase of the project, all reasonable measures will be taken to minimize noise impact from these activities.



2

1. INTRODUCTION The objective of this analysis was to assess the potential traffic noise impact associated with the extension of the Martin Luther King Freeway (Route 58) in Portsmouth, Virginia and to evaluate noise abatement measures wherever this impact is expected to occur. The project involves a one-mile extension on new location of Route 58, from the existing interchange with London Boulevard to a new interchange with Interstate 264. The study area also includes the Interstate 264 corridor from east of South Street and Des Moines Avenue to the interchange with Route 337 Portsmouth Boulevard. Refer to Figures 1 through 11 for graphics showing more project design detail. This report presents a description of noise terminology, the applicable standards and criteria, a description of the computations of existing and future noise levels, a projection of expected future noise impact, a preliminary investigation of abatement measures in locations where impact is predicted, and a discussion of construction noise. Appendix A includes the traffic data that was used as input to the Traffic Noise Model (TNM). Appendix B includes a listing of all studied properties and their computed noise levels.



3

2. NOISE TERMINOLOGY AND CRITERIA The potential traffic noise impact related to the proposed extension of the Martin Luther King Freeway was assessed in accordance with FHWA and VDOT noise assessment guidelines. The FHWA guidelines are set forth in 23 CFR Part 772.[1] VDOT’s regulations are contained within the State Noise Abatement Policy[2], and are consistent with the FHWA guidelines. To determine the degree of impact of highway traffic noise on human activity, the Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) established by the FHWA regulation were used (see Table 1). The NAC are given in terms of the hourly, A-weighted, equivalent sound level in decibels (dBA). The A-weighted sound level is a single number measure of sound intensity with weighted frequency characteristics that corresponds to human subjective response to noise. Most environmental noise (and the A-weighted sound level) fluctuates from moment to moment, and it is common practice to characterize the fluctuating level by a single number called the equivalent sound level (Leq). The Leq is the value or level of a steady, non-fluctuating sound that represents the same sound energy as the actual time-varying sound evaluated over the same time period. For traffic noise assessment, Leq is typically evaluated over a one-hour period, and may be denoted as Leq(h). Table 1. FHWA NOISE ABATEMENT CRITERIA

Activity

Category

Leq(h)*

Description of Activity Category

A

57 (Exterior)

Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose.

B

67 (Exterior)

Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, hotels, schools, churches, libraries and hospitals

C

72 (Exterior)

Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above.

D

--

Undeveloped lands.

E

52 (Interior)

Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals and auditoriums.

* Hourly A-weighted Sound Level (dBA)

Noise-sensitive land uses potentially affected by this project are in Categories B and E and consist of exterior areas of residential properties, five churches, two



4

day care centers, a playground, a basketball court, a cemetery, and interior areas of the churches and day care centers. The project corridor also contains industrial properties, however these facilities do not include Category C exterior noise sensitive activities. Per FHWA, noise impact occurs when the predicted noise levels in the project area “approach or exceed” the NAC during the loudest hour of the day. As shown in Table 1 above, the applicable NAC for Category B exterior activities is 67 dBA Leq and for Category E interior activities is 52 dBA Leq. VDOT defines the word “approach” to mean when the loudest-hour Leq equals 1 dB less than the NAC. Therefore, noise impact occurs when future noise levels equal or exceed 66 dBA Leq for Activity Category B and 51 dBA Leq for Activity Category E. Noise impact also occurs when predicted noise levels substantially exceed existing noise levels. An increase of 10 decibels or more is considered “substantial” by VDOT. For land uses under any of the activity categories, wherever the predicted design-year build alternative noise levels during the loudest hour of the day either (1) approach or exceed the NAC, or (2) exceed existing noise levels by 10 decibels or more, then consideration of traffic-noise abatement measures is necessary. Noise abatement that will be effective in reducing noise impact will be considered reasonable and feasible unless it is found that such mitigation measures will cause adverse social, economic and environmental effects that outweigh the benefits received. Noise levels in the project study area were determined for the 2007 existing conditions, the design-year 2032 no-build conditions, and the design-year 2032 build conditions.



5

3. MODELING AND PROJECTIONS 3.1 Highway Noise Computation Model All traffic-noise computations for this study were conducted using the latest version of the FHWA Traffic Noise Model (FHWA TNM 2.5)[3]. The traffic data and engineering drawings developed for the environmental document were used as input to TNM. In general, sound propagation over acoustically “soft” ground (e.g. lawn, with an effective flow resistivity of 300 cgs Rayls) was assumed throughout the study area, except where sound propagation occurred over acoustically “hard” ground (such as asphalt or water, with an effective flow resistivity of 20,000 cgs Rayls). 3.2 Traffic Data For Noise Computations Traffic data for highway-noise computation was provided by VDOT for 2006 (Existing) and 2032 (Design-year for Build and No-build cases). A 1-percent growth factor per year was applied to the 2006 data to bring the Existing year to 2007. The traffic data included hourly vehicle volumes and vehicle classifications, directional distributions, and some operating speeds. Those speeds not provided were estimated based on posted speeds and observations made while on-site in the study area. Appendix A provides a summary of the traffic data used in the noise analysis. 3.3 Computed Existing and Future Noise Levels The project corridor includes a number of areas containing noise-sensitive properties. These areas include along both sides of Martin Luther King Freeway from south of London Boulevard to south of High Street, along both sides of Interstate 264 east of the proposed new interchange with Route 58, along the eastbound side of Interstate 264 southwest of the Route 58 interchange, at the Interstate 264 interchange with Route 17, and along both sides of Interstate 264 from the interchange with Route 17 to the interchange with Route 337. The following paragraphs include descriptions of the study areas and summaries of the associated noise levels. Appendix B includes these computed noise levels representing existing, DY2032 no-build, and DY2032 build conditions for all studied properties. Figures 1 through 11 show the study areas and study sites. These figures also show the 66 dBA noise contours developed for the DY2032 build condition.



6

3.3.1 Interstate 264 Interchange with Route 337 to Interchange with Route 17 – South of Interstate 264 Noise sensitive properties in this area are Sites 1 through 22 and 308 through 336 (see Figures 1, 2, and 3). All sites except 322 and 323 – J.F. Kennedy Rec Building and Douglas Park – are residential properties located on Trexler Avenue, Magnolia Street, Carver Circle, Manteo Street, Grand Street, Calvin Street, Killian Street, Frederick Boulevard, Neville Street, Radford Street, and Grove Street. The area includes the area south of Interstate 264 and the area in the southwest quadrant of the interchange with Route 17. Design year 2032 predictions indicate that Build and No-Build noise levels at these sites will range from 62 to 74 dBA and 62 to 73 dBA respectively. Existing levels also range from 62 to 73 dBA. Thirteen residential properties – nine in the southwest quadrant of the Interstate 264 interchange with Route 17 and four south of Interstate 264 - are predicted to be impacted as a result of noise levels approaching or exceeding the Category B NAC. 3.3.2 Interstate 264 Interchange with Route 337 to Interchange with Route 17 – North of Interstate 264 Noise sensitive properties in this area are Sites 337 through 371 (see Figures 1, 2, and 3). All sites are residential properties located on Choate Street, north of and parallel with Interstate 264. 2007 Existing noise levels in this area range from 60 to 70 dBA, while 2032 No-Build and Build levels are predicted to range from 61 to 71 dBA. Build levels will be no more than 1 decibel higher than Existing levels at any of the sites. In the 2032 design year, 38 residential properties are predicted to be impacted under the Build condition with noise levels approaching or exceeding the Category B NAC. 3.3.3 Interstate 264 Interchange with Route 58 - South This area includes Sites 23 through 95, with apartments and a playground on Dale Drive, and one residence on Columbus Avenue and another on Nashville Avenue (see Figure 5). 2007 Existing noise levels at the 73 sites range from 58 to 65 dBA. By design year 2032, No-build levels are predicted to range from 59 to 66 dBA, while Build levels are predicted to range from 58 to 62 dBA. The No-build levels are higher than Build levels at most sites due to the Route 58 interchange (which will not exist under the no-build condition) and the elevated ramps which will provide shielding from Interstate 264 traffic noise. Four of the sites are predicted to be impacted under the 2032 No-build condition with levels reaching 66 dBA. No sites in this area are predicted to be impacted under the Build condition.



7

3.3.4 Interstate 264 East of Interchange with Route 58 - South This area includes a cemetery (3 sections), a church on Piedmont Avenue, two day care facilities on Duke Street, and residential properties on Pulaski Street, Calvary Court, Deep Creek Boulevard, Piedmont Avenue, Des Moines Avenue, Lansing Avenue, Charleston Avenue, Richmond Avenue, Parker Avenue, Atlanta Avenue, Camden Avenue, and Elm Avenue. These 115 sites (96 through 210) can be found on Figures 6 – 8. Exterior noise levels at these sites range from 59 to 69 dBA under the 2007 Existing condition. Thirty-five properties including one section of the Mount Calvary Cemetery receive levels of 66 to 69 dBA. Under the 2032 No-build condition, 43 properties, including two sections of the cemetery and the Holy Trinity Church, are predicted to experience impact in exterior areas. Noise levels are predicted to range from 59 to 70 dBA. Noise levels under the 2032 Build condition, ranging from 59 to 69 dBA will result in impact at 22 properties plus one section of the cemetery. No-build noise levels are higher than Build levels at some sites due to the new Route 58 interchange, which will not exist with the No-build alternative. Interior 2032 Build levels at the church and two day care facilities under closed window conditions are below 51 dBA, ranging from 40 to 45 dBA. All three buildings are air-conditioned, allowing for closed window conditions. 3.3.5 Interstate 264 East of Interchange with Route 58 - North Sites 211 through 254 (see Figures 6, 7, and 9), which are residential properties and a basketball court, are located in this area on South Street, Rose Avenue, Columbus Avenue, and Swanson Parkway. Swanson Homes are townhomes, and each site (212 through 220 and 222 through 226) represent six first floor units. Existing noise levels in this area in 2007 range from 61 to 71 dBA and result in impact at exterior areas of 48 properties including 36 Swanson Homes units. Design year 2032 No-build predicted noise levels range from 62 to 72 dBA with impact at 57 properties including 42 units in Swanson Homes. Noise levels under the 2032 Build alternative are predicted to range from 62 to 70 dBA with impact predicted at 53 properties including 36 units in Swanson Homes. Noise levels at most sites in this area are predicted to be higher under the No-build rather than the Build alternative because of the new Route 58 interchange which will not exist under the no-build condition. The proposed new interchange ramps will be elevated, and combined with the parapets, will shield the noise sensitive properties from ramp traffic noise.



8

3.3.6 Route 58 Extension South of High Street - West All sites in this area are residential properties (Sites 255 through 267) located on Meander Street, King Street, and High Street and are shown in Figures 10 and 11. Existing noise levels at the 13 properties range from 51 to 59 dBA. Noise levels under the 2032 No-build and Build alternatives are predicted to range from 52 to 60 dBA and 57 to 63 dBA respectively. No sites in this area are predicted to be noise impacted. 3.3.7 Route 58 Extension South of High Street – East Only two sites are included in this area, Bethel Temple Church on County Street and Morning Star Church on High Street (see Figures 10 and 11). Exterior noise levels at the two churches range from 52 to 61 dBA in the existing year, and are predicted to range from 53 to 62 dBA and 59 to 62 dBA under the 2032 No-build and Build conditions respectively. Both churches are air-conditioned, allowing for closed-window conditions, resulting in 2032 levels no higher than 42 dBA. Neither of the two churches are predicted to be noise impacted. 3.3.8 Route 58 North of High Street - East Sites in this area (270 through 292) include residential properties on Queen Street, Constitution Avenue, and Liverpool Street and Soul’s Paradise Church (on High Street) and Calvary Baptist Church (on Constitution Avenue). These sites can be found in Figure 11. Existing exterior levels in 2007 at these sites range from 53 dBA to 63 dBA. During 2032, No-build levels are predicted to range from 54 to 64 dBA, while Build levels are predicted to range from 57 to 64 dBA. Interior levels at the churches (both are air-conditioned) under closed window conditions will be 44 dBA under Build conditions. No properties are predicted to be noise impacted in this area. 3.3.9 Route 58 North of High Street – West All sites in this area are residential properties on Queen Street and MacArthur Avenue (293 through 307), and are shown in Figures 11. Existing (2007) noise levels range from 55 to 61 dBA, while 2032 No-build and Build alternative levels are predicted to range from 56 to 62 and 59 to 65 dBA respectively. No properties are predicted to be noise impacted in this area.

Noise Analysis Technical Report 9

Route 58 MLK Portsmouth, Virginia May 2008 VDOT Project No. 0058-965-107, P101

Figure 1



Figure 2



Figure 3



Figure 4



Figure 5



Figure 6



Figure 7



Figure 8



Figure 9



Figure 10



Figure 11



4. NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT The projected traffic noise impact related to the Route 58 (Martin Luther King Freeway) Extension project in Portsmouth, Virginia was assessed in accordance with procedures and criteria approved by the FHWA and VDOT. The assessment identified Design Year 2032 noise impact at 125 residential properties (including 36 townhome units), a recreation center, and a section of a cemetery. All impact will be due to noise-levels approaching or exceeding the NAC, no sites are predicted to experience a substantial increase between existing and build noise levels. However, the assessment predicts that 108 residential properties (including 42 townhome units), two sections of a cemetery, and exterior areas of a church are predicted to be impacted under the 2032 No-build alternative, and that 89 residential properties (including 36 townhome units) and a section of a cemetery experience noise impact under the 2007 Existing case. As stated previously, the higher noise levels (resulting in more noise impact) predicted for the 2032 No-build alternative, and in some cases for the 2007 Existing condition, (as compared to the Build alternative) are due to the extension of Route 58. The elevated ramps at the new interchange, which do not and will not exist for the Existing and No-build cases, will provide shielding from traffic noise generated on the mainline. Table 2 is a summary of noise impact by study area. TABLE 2 – NOISE IMPACT SUMMARY

Area

Study Area

2007 Exist

Impact

2032 NBld Impact

2032 Bld Impact

1 EB I264 – Rt 337 to Rt 17 2 Res 16 Res 13 Res Rec Center

2 WB I264 – Rt 17 to Rt 337 42 Res 42 Res 38 Res 3 I264 E of Rt 58

Int - South 34 Res Cem

40 Res 1 Ch 2 Cem

22 Res Cem

4 I264 E of Rt 58 Int-North 48 Res 57 Res 53 Res 5 Rt 58 Ext S of High St-West 0 0 0 6 Rt 58 Ext S of High St-East 0 0 0 7 Rt 58 N of High St-East 0 0 0 8 Rt 58 N of High St-West 0 0 0

Total 126 Res

Cemetery 155 Res

1 Church 2 Cemetery

126 Res Cemetery

Rec Ctr



5. NOISE ABATEMENT The FHWA has identified certain noise abatement measures that may be incorporated in projects to reduce or eliminate traffic noise impact. Mitigation measures that have been considered for this project include alternative measures (traffic management and the alteration of horizontal and vertical alignment), plus the construction of noise barriers. 5.1 Alternative Noise Abatement Measures Traffic management measures normally considered for noise abatement include reduced speeds and truck restrictions. Reduced speeds will not be an effective noise mitigation measure since a substantial decrease in speed is necessary to provide a significant noise reduction. In addition, the reduction would need to be applied to Interstate 264, and part of the purpose and need for this project is to increase roadway capacity and traffic flow in the area. A speed reduction on Interstate 264 would not accomplish that. Restricting truck usage on Interstate 264 would not be practical as it is a major truck route in the area, and part of the purpose and need for the project is to remove truck traffic from local roads. The alteration of the horizontal or vertical alignment beyond what is already planned as part of the project would not be effective or practical. Elevating the extended portion of Route 58 as it crosses Interstate 264 is predicted to reduce Build case noise levels at a number of sites studied as part of this assessment. 5.2 Noise Barriers The construction of noise barriers has been considered for each of the 126 residential properties for which impact has been predicted under the 2032 Build alternative. At one location, a barrier has been determined not to be feasible due to the requirement for access (see Barrier 5 in Figure 3). At two other locations, constructing barriers has been determined to be feasible in protecting some of the impacted properties, while other sites require property access and cannot be protected (see Barriers 1 and 2 on next page). To be feasible, a barrier must be effective, that is it must reduce noise levels by at least 5 decibels. To be reasonable, a barrier cannot cost more than $30,000 per protected or benefited residential property. A residential property is “protected” if it will be exposed to future noise impact and will receive at least 5 decibels of noise reduction from a barrier. By comparison, a residential property is “benefited” if it is not exposed to future noise impact, but will still receive at least 5 decibels of noise reduction from a barrier designed to protect other properties. A barrier not found to be reasonable due to cost can still be constructed if a third party (other than FHWA or VDOT) funds the amount above $30,000 per residential property.



The five barriers or barrier systems are discussed below and are summarized in Table 4. A two barrier system (Barriers 1 and 2) would be constructed to protect impacted properties south of Eastbound Interstate 264 east of the proposed interchange with Route 58 (Figures 3 and 4). The impact assessment results for that area are in Section 3.3.3. Due to property access requirements, the barrier system could protect only 12 of the 22 impacted residences and the cemetery and would benefit 17 residential properties by providing 5 to 7 decibels of noise reduction at a cost of $41,460 per property. This cost exceeds the $30,000 per property maximum. This preliminary evaluation indicates that constructing the barrier system would be feasible but not reasonable. Constructing Barrier 3 (Figures 6 and 7) has also been determined to be feasible. The impact assessment results for that area are in Section 3.3.4. The barrier would be built to protect residential properties located north of westbound Interstate 264 east of the proposed interchange with Route 58. Barrier 3 would protect 52 of 53 impacted residential properties and would benefit 52 properties by providing 5 to 7 decibels of noise reduction at a cost of $9,511 per property, well within the $30,000 per property maximum. This barrier appears to be reasonable. Barrier 4 has been determined to be feasible and would protect 35 residential properties at a cost of $24,079 per protected property. It would be located just off the shoulder of westbound Interstate 264 (see Figures 2 and 3). Barrier 6 (Figures 2 and 3) has been determined to be feasible but not reasonable. It would protect four residential properties and a recreation center at a cost of $76,923 per protected residential property. The value to the recreation center is questionable, since there are no windows on the side of the one-story building facing Interstate 264, and outside activity areas appear to be at most on the side of the building partially shielded from the noise source. The barrier findings discussed in this section of the report have been based on a very preliminary feasibility and reasonableness evaluation. Final barrier decisions will not be made until a detailed evaluation based on final project design has been completed.



TABLE 3 – NOISE BARRIER SUMMARY Barrier Number

Barrier Location Sta Nos

Height (Feet)

Length(Feet)

SurfaceArea (sq ft)

Protected (Benefited)Properties

Barrier Cost

Cost Per

Property

1-2

I264 EB 1439+00

Ramp 110+00 I264 EB 1452+00 1467+00

9-10

12

1,724

1,501

16,549

18,001 30

$595,706

$648,088 $41,460

3 I264 WB 1471+00

Rt 58 Ramp 405+00

10-11 2,685 27,479 104 $989,133 $9,511

4

I264 WB 1399+00 1378+00

10-15 2,090 23,411 35 $842,761 $24,079

6

L264 EB 261+00 270+00

10

855

8,547

4

$307,692

$76,923

TOTALS 9-15 8,855 85,440 173 $3,383,380 $19,557 Note – Barrier costs based on unit cost of $36 per square foot for barrier materials and installation.

6. CONSTRUCTION NOISE An increase in project area noise levels will occur during the construction of the proposed project improvements. Construction noise differs from that generated by normal traffic due to differences in the spectral and temporal characteristics of the noise. The degree of noise impact during construction will be a function of the number and types of equipment being used, and the distances between the construction equipment and the noise-sensitive areas. Generally, construction activity will occur during normal working hours on weekdays. Therefore, noise impact experienced by local residents as a result of construction activities should not occur during sleeping hours. Some impact will occur in the project vicinity where outdoor recreation takes place during normal working hours. A number of measures can be utilized in order to minimize noise resulting from construction activities. Such measures include, but are not limited to, the following:



• Equip any internal combustion engine used for any purpose on or related to the job with a properly operating muffler;

• Conduct truck loading, unloading and hauling so that noise is kept to a minimum;

• Route construction equipment and vehicles in areas that will cause the least disturbance to nearby receptors where possible; and

• Place continuously operated diesel-powered equipment, such as compressors and generators, in areas as far as possible from or shielded from noise-sensitive locations.

• Wherever possible, noise barriers to be constructed as part of the project will be constructed as soon as possible to allow the barriers to protect noise-sensitive areas from construction noise.

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has developed a specification concerning construction noise that is applicable to this project. In summary, the specification requires the Contractor to limit construction noise levels to 80 decibels in noise-sensitive areas adjacent to the project area. Further, VDOT may monitor construction noise and require noise abatement where exterior noise levels from construction operations exceed 80 decibels. Also, VDOT may prohibit or Restrict work that produces objectionable noise between 10 P.M. and 6 A.M. Construction equipment cannot be altered such that noise levels will be greater than that of the original equipment. These provisions are contained in Section 107.14(b) 3 Noise[4] and are reproduced below:

• “The Contractor’s operations shall be performed so that exterior noise levels measured during a noise-sensitive activity shall be not more than 80 decibels. Noise sensitive activity is any activity for which lowered noise levels are essential if the activity is to serve its intended purpose. Such activities include, but are not limited to, those associated with Residences, hospitals, nursing homes, churches, schools, libraries, parks, and recreational areas.”

• “The Department may monitor construction-related noise. If construction noise levels exceed 80 decibels, the Contractor shall take corrective action before proceeding with operations. The Contractor shall be responsible for costs associated with the abatement of construction noise and the delay of operations attributable to noncompliance with these requirements.”

• “The Department may prohibit or restrict to certain portions of the project any work that produces objectionable noise between 10 P.M. and 6 A.M. If other hours are established by local ordinance, the local ordinance shall govern.”

• “Equipment shall in no way be altered so as to result in noise levels that are greater than those produced by the original equipment.”



• “When feasible, the Contractor shall establish haul routes that direct his vehicles away from developed areas and ensure that noise from hauling operations is kept to a minimum.”

• “These requirements are not applicable if the noise produced by sources other than the Contractor’s operation at the point of reception is greater than the noise from the Contractor’s operation at the same point.”

Noise Analysis Technical Report R-1


REFERENCES ________________ 1. Federal Highway Administration, ”23 CFR Part 772: Procedures for

Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise -- Final Rule. “ Federal Register, Vol. 47, No. 131, 8 July 1982.

2. Virginia Department of Transportation, State Noise Abatement Policy,

January 1, 1997. 3. Christopher W. Menge, Christopher F. Rossano, Grant S. Anderson,

Christopher J. Bajdek, FHWA Traffic Noise Model, Version 1.0: Technical Manual. Report No. FHWA-PD-96-010 and DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-98-2. Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Acoustics Facility, February 1998.

4. Virginia Department of Transportation, Road and Bridge Specifications, Section 107.14(b) 3 Noise, 2002.

1Noise Analysis Technical Report A1


APPENDIX A. TRAFFIC DATA USED IN NOISE ANALYSIS

Existing Year (2007) Traffic

Roadway Peak Hour

VolumeAutos Medium

Trucks Heavy Trucks

Speed mph

Rt 58 SB – N of London to London Blvd 1000 970 10 20 50 Rt 58 SB – London Blvd to High St 449 435 5 9 30 Rt 58 SB – London Ramp to Loop 707 686 7 14 40 Rt 58 NB – High St to London Blvd 409 397 4 8 30 Rt 58 NB – London Loop to Ramp 566 549 6 11 40 Rt 58 NB – London to N of London 1293 1254 13 26 50 London Blvd EB – W of Rt 58 to Rt 58 576 564 6 6 40 London Blvd EB – Rt 58 Loop to Loop 834 818 8 8 40 London Blvd EB – Rt 58 to E of Rt 58 677 663 7 7 40 London Blvd WB – E of Rt 58 to Rt 58 1480 1450 15 15 40 London Blvd WB – RT 58 Ramp to Ramp 753 737 8 8 40 London Blvd WB – Rt 58 to W of Rt 58 1045 1025 10 10 40 Rt 58 SB off Ramp to London Blvd WB 293 287 3 3 35 Rt 58 NB on Ramp from London Blvd WB 727 713 7 7 35 Rt 58 SB – off Loop to London Blvd EB 258 252 3 3 35 Rt 58 NB – on Loop from London Blvd EB 157 153 2 2 35 High St – W of Rt 58 1020 1000 10 10 30 High St – E of Rt 58 1192 1168 12 12 30 Harbor Dr SB – High St to Turnpike Rd 172 168 2 2 30 Harbor Dr NB – Turnpike Rd to High St 131 129 1 1 30 Turnpike Rd SB 217 213 2 2 30 Turnpike Rd NB 192 188 2 2 30 I264 WB – E of South St 3550 3372 36 142 60 I264 EB – E of Deep Creek Blvd 2636 2505 26 105 60 I264 WB – South St to Rt 17 3823 3632 38 153 60 I264 EB – E of Rt 17 to Deep Creek Blvd 2813 2672 28 113 60 I264 WB – E of Rt 17 to W of Rt 17 3257 3094 33 130 60 I264 EB – W of Rt 17 to E of Rt 17 1813 1722 18 73 60 I264 EB – Rt 17 Exit Ramp to Enter Ramp 1609 1524 16 69 60 I264 EB – Rt 337 to W of Rt 17 1630 1548 16 65 60 I264 WB – W of Rt 17 to Rt 337 2790 2650 28 112 60 Rt 337 SB Loop to I264 EB 183 177 2 4 50 I264 WB Ramp to Rt 337 NB 467 453 5 9 50 Rt 17 NB – S of Rt 264 to Rt 264 1257 1219 13 25 50 Rt 17 NB – Rt 264 to N of Rt 264 1424 1382 14 28 50 Rt 17 NB – North of Rt 264 1410 1368 14 28 50 Rt 17 SB – North of Rt 264 1285 1246 13 26 50 Rt 17 SB – N of Rt 264 to Rt 264 1298 1259 13 26 50 Rt 17 SB – Rt 264 to S of Rt 264 697 676 7 14 50



Roadway Peak Hour

VolumeAutos Medium

Trucks Heavy Trucks

Speed mph

Rt 17 SB – Ramp to I264 WB 340 330 3 7 50 I264 EB Ramp to Rt 17 SB 204 198 2 4 45 I264 EB Ramp from Rt 17 SB 326 317 3 6 45 I264 EB Ramp from Rt 17 NB 756 733 8 15 45 South St – E of Rt 264 to Rt 264 298 292 3 3 35 Deep Creek Blvd – S of Rt 264 773 757 8 8 35 I264 EB Ramp to Des Moines Ave 177 173 2 2 40

No-Build (2032) Traffic

Roadway Peak Hour

VolumeAutos Medium

Trucks Heavy Trucks

Speed mph

Rt 58 SB – N of London to London Blvd 1315 1276 13 26 50 Rt 58 SB – London Blvd to High St 605 587 6 12 30 Rt 58 SB – London Ramp to Loop 935 907 9 19 40 Rt 58 NB – High St to London Blvd 625 606 6 13 30 Rt 58 NB – London Loop to Ramp 830 805 8 17 40 Rt 58 NB – London to N of London 1600 1552 16 32 50 London Blvd EB – W of Rt 58 to Rt 58 645 633 6 6 40 London Blvd EB – Rt 58 Loop to Loop 975 955 10 10 40 London Blvd EB – Rt 58 to E of Rt 58 770 754 8 8 40 London Blvd WB – E of Rt 58 to Rt 58 1660 1626 17 17 40 London Blvd WB – RT 58 Ramp to Ramp 890 872 9 9 40 London Blvd WB – Rt 58 to W of Rt 58 1270 1244 13 13 40 Rt 58 SB off Ramp to London Blvd WB 380 372 4 4 35 Rt 58 NB on Ramp from London Blvd WB 770 754 8 8 35 Rt 58 SB – off Loop to London Blvd EB 330 324 3 3 35 Rt 58 NB – on Loop from London Blvd EB 205 201 2 2 35 High St – W of Rt 58 1170 1146 12 12 30 High St – E of Rt 58 1475 1445 15 15 30 Harbor Dr SB – High St to Turnpike Rd 180 176 2 2 30 Harbor Dr NB – Turnpike Rd to High St 165 161 2 2 30 Turnpike Rd SB 260 254 3 3 30 Turnpike Rd NB 230 226 2 2 30 I264 WB – E of South St 4110 3905 41 164 60 I264 EB – E of Deep Creek Blvd 3130 2974 31 125 60 I264 WB – South St to Rt 17 4390 4170 44 176 60 I264 EB – E of Rt 17 to Deep Creek Blvd 3320 3154 33 133 60 I264 WB – E of Rt 17 to W of Rt 17 3630 3449 36 145 60 I264 EB – W of Rt 17 to E of Rt 17 2230 2119 22 89 60 I264 EB – Rt 17 Ramp to Loop 1979 1880 20 79 60



Roadway Peak Hour

VolumeAutos Medium

Trucks Heavy Trucks

Speed mph

I264 EB – Rt 337 to W of Rt 17 2005 1905 20 80 60 Rt 337 SB Loop to I264 EB 225 218 2 5 50 I264 WB Ramp to Rt 337 NB 520 494 5 21 50 Rt 17 NB – S of I264 to I264 1020 990 10 20 50 Rt 17 NB – I264 to N of I264 1730 1678 17 35 50 Rt 17 SB – N of I264 to I264 1490 1445 15 30 50 Rt 17 SB – I264 to S of I264 800 776 8 16 50 Rt 17 SB – Ramp to I264 WB 145 141 1 3 50 I264 EB Ramp to Rt 17 SB 251 243 3 5 45 I264 EB Ramp from Rt 17 SB 401 389 4 8 45 I264 EB Ramp from Rt 17 NB 930 902 9 19 45 South St – E of I264 to I264 305 299 3 3 35 Deep Creek Blvd – S of I264 820 804 8 8 35 I264 EB Ramp to Des Moines Ave 190 186 2 2 40

Build (2032) Traffic

Roadway Peak Hour

VolumeAutos Medium

Trucks Heavy Trucks

Speed mph

Rt 58 SB – N of London to London Blvd 1335 1295 13 27 55 Rt 58 SB – London Blvd to High St 540 524 5 11 55 Rt 58 SB – High St to I264 860 834 9 17 55 Rt 58 NB – I264 to High St 1105 1072 11 22 55 Rt 58 NB – High St to London Blvd 590 572 6 12 55 Rt 58 NB – London Blvd to N of London 1655 1605 17 33 55 London Blvd EB – W of Rt 58 to Rt 58 1015 995 10 10 40 London Blvd EB – Rt 58 to E of Rt 58 765 749 8 8 40 London Blvd WB – E of Rt 58 to Rt 58 1550 1518 16 16 40 London Blvd WB – Rt 58 to E of Rt 58 1530 1500 15 15 40 Rt 58 SB off loop to London Blvd EB 255 249 3 3 40 London Blvd EB off loop to Rt 58 NB 505 495 5 5 40 High St – Between Rt 58 ramps 1075 1053 11 11 30 High St – W of Rt 58 to Rt 58 1395 1367 14 14 30 High St – Rt 58 to E of Rt 58 1010 990 10 10 30 High St off ramp to Rt 58 SB 320 314 3 3 35 High St on ramp from Rt 58 NB 515 505 5 5 30 Rt 58 SB off ramp to I264 WB 375 367 4 4 40 Rt 58 SB off loop to I264 EB 485 475 5 5 40 Rt 58 NB on ramp from I264 WB 840 824 8 8 40 Rt 58 NB on loop from I264 EB 265 259 3 3 40 South St E of Rt 58 and N of I264 295 289 3 3 35



Roadway Peak Hour

VolumeAutos Medium

Trucks Heavy Trucks

Speed mph

I264 WB – E of Rt 58 5050 4798 50 202 61 I264 WB – off ramp to on ramp at Rt 58 4210 4000 42 168 60 I264 WB – W of Rt 58 4585 4356 46 183 60 I264 WB – W of Rt 17 3770 3581 38 151 61 I264 WB – Rt 17 Ramp to Rt 337 Ramp 3930 3733 31 157 60 I264 WB – W of Rt 17 to Rt 337 3410 3240 34 136 60 I264 WB Ramp to Rt 337 NB 520 494 5 21 50 Rt 337 SB Loop to I264 EB 225 218 2 5 50 Rt 17 SB – N of I264 1135 1101 11 23 50 Rt 17 SB Off Ramp to I264 WB 145 141 1 3 50 Rt 17 SB – S of I264 935 907 9 19 50 Rt 17 NB – S of I264 1595 1547 16 32 50 Rt 17 NB – N of I264 1625 1576 16 33 50 I264 EB – Rt 337 to W of Rt 17 1980 1881 20 79 60 I264 EB – Rt 337 Ramp to Rt 17 Ramp 2205 2095 22 88 60 I264 EB – W of Rt 17 2305 2190 23 92 63 I264 EB – E of off ramp to Rt 17 1780 1691 18 71 59 I264 EB – off ramp to Rt 17 260 252 3 5 45 I264 EB – Rt 17 to Rt 58 3025 2874 30 121 60 I264 EB – off ramp to on ramp 2760 2622 28 110 60 I264 EB – Rt 58 to Deep Creek Blvd 3510 3335 35 140 60 I264 EB – ramp to Des Moines Ave 265 259 3 3 40 I264 EB – E of Deep Creek Blvd 3245 3083 32 130 60 I264 EB – on ramp from Rt 17 NB 960 931 10 19 50 I264 EB – on ramp from Rt 17 SB 285 276 3 6 50 Deep Creek Blvd – S of I264 1110 1088 11 11 35

1Noise Analysis Technical Report B


1

APPENDIX B. COMPUTED EXISTING 2007 and FUTURE 2032 NOISE LEVELS (DBA)

SITE LOCATION

2007 EXIST

2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

1 3333 Trexler Ave. 64 65 66 Yes 2 3329 Trexler Ave. 64 65 65 No 3 3325 Trexler Ave. 64 65 65 No 4 3321 Trexler Ave. 64 64 64 No 5 3317 Trexler Ave. 64 64 64 No 6 3313 Trexler Ave. 64 64 64 No 7 3309 Trexler Ave. 64 64 64 No 8 3305 Trexler Ave. 64 64 64 No 9 3301 Trexler Ave. 65 65 65 No 10 3232 Killian Ave. 62 63 62 No 11 3228 Killian Ave. 63 63 63 No 12 3224 Killian Ave. 63 63 63 No 13 3220 Killian Ave. 63 64 64 No 14 3216 Killian Ave. 64 64 64 No 15 3212 Killian Ave. 65 65 66 Yes 16 3208 Killian Ave. 67 67 67 Yes 17 3204 Killian Ave. 68 68 68 Yes 18 3200 Killian Ave. 72 72 73 Yes 19 2214 Frederick Blvd. 73 73 74 Yes 20 2212 Frederick Blvd. 73 73 74 Yes 21 2210 Frederick Blvd. 73 73 74 Yes 22 2208 Frederick Blvd. 72 72 72 Yes 23 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 118 62 62 62 No 24 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 117 62 62 61 No 25 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 116 61 62 61 No 26 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 115 61 61 61 No 27 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 114 62 62 61 No 28 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 113 62 62 61 No 29 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 112 63 63 62 No 30 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 111 63 63 62 No 31 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 110 64 64 62 No 32 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 109 64 65 62 No 33 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 108 65 65 61 No 34 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 107 65 65 61 No 35 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 106 64 65 62 No 36 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 105 64 64 62 No 37 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 104 63 63 62 No 38 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 103 62 62 61 No 39 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 102 62 63 61 No 40 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 101 63 63 61 No 41 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 100 64 64 62 No 42 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 99 64 64 62 No 43 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 98 65 65 61 No 44 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 97 65 66 61 No



2

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

45 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 96 65 65 62 No 46 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 95 64 65 62 No 47 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 94 63 64 62 No 48 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 93 63 63 62 No 49 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 92 62 63 61 No 50 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 91 62 62 61 No 51 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 74 61 61 61 No 52 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 73 62 62 61 No 53 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 72 62 62 61 No 54 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 71 63 63 62 No 55 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 70 63 64 62 No 56 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 69 63 63 62 No

57 2300 Dale Dr. Playground 63 63 62 No

58 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 68 62 62 62 No 59 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 67 61 62 61 No 60 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 66 61 61 61 No 61 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 65 61 61 60 No 62 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 46 60 60 60 No 63 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 45 60 61 61 No 64 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 44 61 61 61 No 65 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 43 62 62 62 No 66 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 42 62 62 62 No 67 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 41 62 63 62 No 68 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 40 62 62 62 No 69 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 39 61 61 61 No 70 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 38 61 61 61 No 71 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 37 60 61 61 No 72 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 36 60 60 60 No 73 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 35 59 59 60 No 74 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 20 59 59 59 No 75 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 19 59 59 60 No 76 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 18 60 60 60 No 77 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 17 60 61 61 No 78 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 16 61 61 61 No 79 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 15 61 61 61 No 80 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 14 60 60 61 No 81 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 13 59 59 60 No 82 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 12 59 59 59 No 83 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 11 58 59 59 No 84 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 10 59 59 59 No 85 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 9 59 59 60 No 86 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 8 60 60 60 No 87 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 7 60 60 60 No 88 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 6 59 59 60 No 89 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 5 58 58 59 No 90 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 4 58 58 59 No 91 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 3 59 59 59 No 92 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 2 59 59 60 No



3

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

93 2300 Dale Dr. Apt 1 58 59 59 No 94 1815 Columbus Ave. 58 58 59 No 95 1800 Nashville Ave. 58 58 58 No 96 Mt. Calvary Cemetery 1 65 65 65 No 97 Mt. Calvary Cemetery 2 69 69 68 Yes 98 Mt. Calvary Cemetery 3 63 63 64 No 99 1510 Pulaski St. 67 67 68 Yes

100 2205 Pulaski St. 67 67 68 Yes 101 1605 Calvary Ct. 62 62 63 No 102 2217 Calvary Ct. 62 62 63 No 103 2205 Calvary Ct. 62 62 62 No 104 2203 Calvary Ct. 62 62 62 No 105 1621 Pulaski St. 61 61 62 No 106 2244 Pulaski St. 60 60 61 No 107 2232 Pulaski St. 60 61 61 No 108 2220 Pulaski St. 61 61 61 No 109 2208 Pulaski St. 61 61 62 No 110 2204 Pulaski St. 63 63 64 No 111 1622 Deep Creek Blvd. 62 63 63 No 112 1312 Piedmont Ave. 64 64 64 No 113 1310 Piedmont Ave. 63 63 63 No 114 1306 Piedmont Ave. 63 64 64 No 115 1302 Piedmont Ave. 64 65 64 No 116 1300 Piedmont Ave. 65 66 65 No 117 1214 Piedmont Ave. 66 66 66 Yes 118 1212 Piedmont Ave. 67 68 67 Yes 119 1301 Piedmont Ave. 66 66 66 Yes

120 1305 Piedmont Ave. Holy Trinity Church 65 65 65 No

121 1430 Des Moines Ave. 66 67 67 Yes 122 1426 Des Moines Ave. 67 68 67 Yes 123 1224 Des Moines Ave. 68 68 68 Yes 124 1220 Des Moines Ave. 69 70 68 Yes 125 1411 Des Moines Ave. 69 70 66 Yes 126 1413 Des Moines Ave. 69 69 67 Yes 127 1417 Des Moines Ave. 69 70 69 Yes 128 1421 Des Moines Ave. 68 68 68 Yes 129 1425 Des Moines Ave. 67 68 67 Yes 130 1429 Des Moines Ave. 67 67 68 Yes 131 1428 Lansing Ave. 63 64 63 No 132 1416 Lansing Ave. 64 64 63 No 133 1414 Lansing Ave. 64 65 64 No 134 1410 Lansing Ave. 66 66 64 No 135 1326 Lansing Ave. 67 68 66 Yes 136 1324 Lansing Ave. 69 69 66 Yes 137 1325 Lansing Ave. 67 68 66 Yes 138 1327 Lansing Ave. 66 67 65 No 139 1331 Lansing Ave. 65 66 64 No 140 1415 Lansing Ave. 64 65 63 No



4

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

141 1431 Lansing Ave. 63 63 62 No 142 1428 Charleston Ave. 61 62 61 No 143 1420 Charleston Ave. 63 63 61 No 144 1416 Charleston Ave. 64 64 63 No 145 1414 Charleston Ave. 65 66 63 No 146 1326 Charleston Ave. 66 67 65 No 147 1324 Charleston Ave. 67 68 66 Yes 148 1323 Charleston Ave. 67 68 66 Yes 149 1401 Charleston Ave. 66 67 64 No 150 1407 Charleston Ave. 65 66 63 No 151 1411 Charleston Ave. 64 65 63 No 152 1419 Charleston Ave. 63 63 61 No 153 1421 Charleston Ave. 62 62 61 No 154 1429 Charleston Ave. 61 61 60 No 155 1426 Richmond Ave. 60 61 60 No 156 1422 Richmond Ave. 61 62 60 No 157 1420 Richmond Ave. 62 63 61 No 158 1418 Richmond Ave. 63 63 61 No 159 1416 Richmond Ave. 63 64 62 No 160 1412 Richmond Ave. 64 64 62 No 161 1328 Richmond Ave. 65 65 63 No 162 1324 Richmond Ave. 66 67 64 No 163 1216 Richmond Ave. 67 68 66 Yes 164 1301 Richmond Ave. 68 69 65 No 165 1321 Richmond Ave. 67 67 65 No 166 1325 Richmond Ave. 65 65 63 No 167 1327 Richmond Ave. 64 65 63 No 168 1409 Richmond Ave. 64 64 62 No 169 1415 Richmond Ave. 62 63 61 No 170 1421 Richmond Ave. 61 62 60 No 171 1425 Richmond Ave. 60 60 60 No 172 1430 Parker Ave. 59 60 60 No 173 1426 Parker Ave. 60 61 60 No 174 1420 Parker Ave. 61 61 61 No 175 1400 Parker Ave. 62 63 61 No 176 1314 Parker Ave. 63 64 62 No 177 1310 Parker Ave. 64 65 62 No 178 1308 Parker Ave. 65 65 63 No 179 1304 Parker Ave. 66 66 64 No 180 1302 Parker Ave. 67 67 64 No 181 1300 Parker Ave. 68 68 65 No 182 1301 Parker Ave. 67 68 65 No 183 1313 Parker Ave. 66 66 64 No 184 1317 Parker Ave. 64 65 63 No 185 1319 Parker Ave. 63 64 62 No 186 1321 Parker Ave. 63 64 62 No 187 1401 Parker Ave. 62 63 62 No 188 1423 Parker Ave. 60 60 60 No 189 1425 Parker Ave. 59 60 59 No



5

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

190 1418 Atlanta Ave. 59 59 59 No 191 1408 Atlanta Ave. 60 61 60 No 192 1400 Atlanta Ave. 61 62 61 No 193 1318 Atlanta Ave. 63 64 62 No 194 1316 Atlanta Ave. 64 64 63 No 195 1312 Atlanta Ave. 65 65 64 No 196 1300 Atlanta Ave. 66 67 65 No

197 1400 Duke St. Day Care Facility 61 62 62 No

198 1400 Duke St. Day Care Play Area 59 60 60 No

199 1419 Camden Ave. 59 60 60 No 200 1405 Camden Ave. 60 61 61 No 201 1401 Camden Ave. 61 62 62 No 202 1315 Camden Ave. 62 63 62 No 203 1311 Camden Ave. 64 64 64 No 204 1307 Camden Ave. 65 65 65 No 205 1301 Camden Ave. 66 67 66 Yes 206 1310 Elm Ave. 65 66 65 No 207 1318 Elm Ave. 64 65 64 No 208 1400 Elm Ave. 62 62 62 No 209 1412 Elm Ave. 61 61 62 No 210 1420 Elm Ave. 59 60 61 No 211 1416 South St. 69 70 70 Yes 212 Swanson Homes 6

Units 1201-1211 64 65 64 No

213 Swanson Homes 6 Units 1200-1210 65 65 65 No

214 Swanson Homes 6 Units 1701-1711 70 70 69 Yes







221 Swanson Homes Basketball Court 63 63 62 No





6

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT




227 2200 South St. 69 69 69 Yes 228 2204 South St. 69 69 69 Yes 229 2208 South St. 68 68 68 Yes 230 2212 South St. 68 68 68 Yes 231 1209 Rose Ave. 65 66 66 Yes 232 1205 Rose Ave. 64 64 65 No 233 1201 Rose Ave. 64 64 64 No 234 2209 Rose Ave. 65 65 66 Yes 235 2205 Rose Ave. 65 65 66 Yes 236 2201 Rose Ave. 65 65 65 No 237 2200 Rose Ave. 62 62 62 No 238 2204 Rose Ave. 62 62 63 No 239 2208 Rose Ave. 62 62 63 No 240 2212 Rose Ave. 62 62 63 No 241 2216 Rose Ave. 62 62 63 No 242 2300 Rose Ave. 62 62 63 No 243 2304 Rose Ave. 62 62 62 No 245 2300 South St. 63 63 64 No 246 2304 South St. 66 66 67 Yes 247 2308 South St. 65 65 66 Yes 248 2323 South St. 64 65 66 Yes 249 1301 Columbus Ave. 64 64 64 No 250 1303 Columbus Ave. 68 68 69 Yes 251 1305 Columbus Ave. 68 68 69 Yes 252 1401 Columbus Ave. 69 68 68 Yes 253 1403 Columbus Ave. 70 70 69 Yes 254 1405 Columbus Ave. 70 70 68 Yes 255 255 Meander St. 72 71 66 Yes 256 602 Meander St. 51 52 57 No 257 2215 King St. 51 52 57 No 258 2211 King St. 52 53 58 No 259 2218 King St. 52 53 59 No 260 2216 King St. 54 55 59 No 261 2214 King St. 54 55 59 No 262 2212 King St. 54 55 59 No 263 2210 King St. 55 56 59 No 264 2208 King St. 55 56 60 No 265 2204 King St. 56 56 61 No 266 2213 High St. 56 57 63 No 267 2209 High St. 58 59 61 No

268 2106 County St. Bethel Temple Church 59 60 63 No



7

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

269 2111 High St. Morning Star Church

61 Ext 41 Int

62 Ext 42 Int

62 Ext 42 Int No

270 2116 High St. Soul's Paradise Church

63 Ext 43 Int

64 Ext 44 Int

64 Ext 44 Int No

271 2125 Queen St. 61 63 61 No 272 2126 Queen St. 59 61 61 No 273 2124 Queen St. 57 59 60 No 274 2122 Queen St. 57 58 60 No 275 2120 Queen St. 56 57 60 No 276 2118 Queen St. 55 57 59 No 277 2116 Queen St. 55 56 59 No 278 2114 Queen St. 54 55 58 No 279 2104 Queen St. 53 54 57 No 280 448 Constitution Ave. 53 54 57 No 281 446 Constitution Ave. 53 54 57 No 282 444 Constitution Ave. 53 54 57 No 283 442 Constitution Ave. 53 54 57 No 284 440 Constitution Ave. 53 54 57 No 285 2117 Liverpool St. 55 56 59 No 286 2111 Liverpool St. 56 57 60 No 287 2115 Liverpool St. 57 58 61 No 288 2119 Liverpool St. 59 61 63 No 289 2125 Liverpool St. 62 63 64 No 290 2110 Liverpool St. 57 58 61 No 291 2108 Liverpool St. 56 57 60 No

292 2117 Constitution Ave. Calvary Baptist Church

59 Ext 39 Int

60 Ext 40 Int

64 Ext 44 Int No

293 2211 Queen St. 58 59 61 No 294 2213 Queen St. 57 59 61 No 295 2215 Queen St. 57 58 60 No 296 2217 Queen St. 56 58 60 No 297 2223 Queen St. 56 57 59 No 298 2225 Queen St. 55 56 59 No 299 2214 Queen St. 56 58 60 No 300 2214 Queen St. 58 59 61 No 301 2210 Queen St. 58 60 61 No 302 2208 Queen St. 60 61 62 No 303 439 MacArthur Ave. 59 60 62 No 304 446 MacArthur Ave. 56 57 60 No 305 442 MacArthur Ave. 58 59 62 No 306 438 MacArthur Ave. 59 60 63 No 307 434 MacArthur Ave. 61 62 65 No 308 3409 Trexler Ave 65 66 64 No 309 3413 Trexler Ave. 65 66 65 No 310 3417 Trexler Ave. 65 66 64 No 311 3421 Trexler Ave. 65 66 64 No 312 3425 Trexler Ave. 65 66 64 No 313 3429 Trexler Ave. 65 66 64 No



8

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

314 3433 Trexler Ave. 65 65 62 315 2616 Magnolia St. 63 64 63 316 347 Carver Circle 65 66 63 317 351 Carver Circle 63 64 63 318 354 Carver Circle 64 64 64 319 5 Manteo St. 65 66 65 320 7 Manteo St. 66 67 66 Yes 321 11 Grand St. 66 67 67 Yes 322 Douglas Park Building 65 66 67 Yes 323 Douglas Park Ball field 63 64 64 324 14 Calvin St. 64 65 64 325 47 Manteo St. 65 66 64 326 49 Manteo St. 65 66 64 327 7 Neville St. 64 65 64 328 4 Neville St. 64 65 64 329 75 Manteo St. 64 65 64 330 77 Manteo St. 64 65 64 331 21 Radford St. 64 64 63 332 22 Radford St. 64 64 63 333 39 Grove St. 64 64 64 334 32 Grove St. 64 64 64 335 50 Grove St. 62 62 62 336 46 Grove St. 62 63 63 337 305 Choate St. 66 66 67 Yes 338 301 Choate St. 66 67 67 Yes 339 299 Choate St. 66 67 67 Yes 340 293 Choate St. 66 67 67 Yes 341 289 Choate St. 67 67 67 Yes 342 287 Choate St. 67 68 68 Yes 343 281 Choate St. 69 69 69 Yes 344 269 Choate St. 69 69 69 Yes 345 265 Choate St. 69 70 70 Yes 346 261 Choate St. 69 69 70 Yes 347 257 Choate St. 70 70 71 Yes 348 255 Choate St. 69 70 70 Yes 349 249 Choate St. 70 71 71 Yes 350 247 Choate St. 69 70 70 Yes 351 241 Choate St. 70 70 70 Yes 352 229 Choate St. 68 69 68 Yes 353 227 Choate St. 68 69 67 Yes 354 225 Choate St. 68 68 66 Yes 355 223 Choate St. 68 68 66 Yes 356 221 Choate St. 67 67 65 357 219 Choate St. 67 67 65 358 217 Choate St. 66 66 65 359 213 Choate St. 66 66 65 360 207 Choate St. 64 65 63 361 205 Choate St. 63 64 63 362 195 Choate St. 63 64 62



9

SITE

LOCATION

2007

EXIST 2032 NB

2032 BUILD

2032 IMPACT

363 191 Choate St. 62 63 62 364 185 Choate St. 62 62 62 365 181 Choate St. 62 62 62 366 179 Choate St. 62 63 62 367 175 Choate St. 61 62 62 368 169 Choate St. 61 62 62 369 165 Choate St. 63 64 64 370 163 Choate St. 61 61 61 371 159 Choate St. 60 61 61

Notes – (1) NAC impact occurs when noise levels approach or exceed 67 dBA exterior (66 dBA and above). (2) Red indicates impact.

noise analysis technical report - virginia …€¦ · noise analysis technical report i route 58...

Documents